META vs ZM
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) and Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM) are both filed with the SEC under Services-Computer Programming, Data Processing, Etc.. META is 47.5× ZM's size by market cap ($1.46T against $30.8B); META trades at the higher fiscal-year P/E (24.3× against 16.2×); ZM reports the higher net margin (39.0% against 30.1%); META grew sales faster over three years (+19.9% against +3.5%); and over the past year ZM returned +21.8% against META's -22.8%.
| META | ZM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $578.02 | $98.43 |
| Market cap | $1.46T | $30.8B |
| P/E (FY) | 24.3× | 16.2× |
| P/S | 7.3× | 6.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.1× | — |
| Gross margin | — | 77.0% |
| Operating margin | 41.4% | 23.1% |
| Net margin | 30.1% | 39.0% |
| Return on equity | 30.2% | 20.3% |
| Sales growth (3y) | +19.9% | +3.5% |
| EPS growth (3y) | +39.8% | +162.9% |
| Dividend yield | 0.4% | — |
| 1-year return | -22.8% | +21.8% |
Screener snapshot — prices as of 2026-08-28. Each side's last close is the most recent session the snapshot holds for that company, which can be an earlier one, and its 1-year return is measured to that close. Market caps struck on 2026-08-27. Last close, market cap and the 1-year return are price figures; every other row is computed over the company's latest filed fiscal year, and the two differ: META FY2025 (ended 2025-12-31); ZM FY2026 (ended 2026-01-31). — not published for this company. A ratio goes unpublished for more than one reason: a component the calculation needs is not on file, the filing does not tag the line it is read from, or the calculation is not defined on the filed basis — EV/EBITDA is not printed on non-positive EBITDA, and return on equity is not computed on a zero or negative equity base.
Who holds them, and who has traded them
| META | ZM | |
|---|---|---|
| Institutional holders (13F) | 5,023 | 812 |
| Insider buyers − sellers (180d) | -5 | -5 |
| Congressional trades disclosed (180d) | 9 | 0 |
| Executive-branch officials on file — trades disclosed (180d) | 24 | 2 |
Counts only. The congressional figures count transactions dated in the trailing 180 days and disclosed in STOCK Act periodic transaction reports; amounts are filed as ranges and are never summed. The executive-branch figures count the same window of transactions, and they are scoped to one roster. The officials OGE posts for direct download. Insider buyers − sellers counts distinct people filing open-market Form 4 purchases minus distinct people filing open-market sales over the trailing 180 days, capped at ±5.
META vs ZM: common questions
- Is META bigger than ZM?
- META carries the larger market cap — $1.46T against $30.8B, both struck on 2026-08-27.
- Which trades at a higher P/E, META or ZM?
- META, at a fiscal-year 24.3× against 16.2× for ZM. Both are price ÷ latest full-year diluted earnings per share, not a trailing-twelve-month P/E.
- How have META and ZM performed over the past year?
- ZM returned +21.8% and META -22.8%, measured on the trailing calendar year to the last close.
- How many institutions hold META and ZM?
- 5,023 13F filers report a position in META and 812 in ZM, on the latest quarter in the panel.
- Are META and ZM in the same industry?
- Both are filed with the SEC under Services-Computer Programming, Data Processing, Etc., which is the classification this pairing is built on.
META overview → · ZM overview → · META institutional ownership → · ZM institutional ownership → · Congress and META → · Executive branch and META → · Executive branch and ZM →
More in Services-Computer Programming, Data Processing, Etc.: APP vs GOOG · APP vs GOOGL · APP vs META · APP vs PINS
Stock comparisons lists every pair this site publishes.
Source: SPZCO — https://spzco.com/vs/meta-vs-zm