Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-31 | 2026-02-26 | described here | not extracted | NOT effective | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · From time to time, we may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently aware of any such proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on these unremediated material weaknesses, the Company’s management concluded that at December 31, 2025, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2025, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of such date due to material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, as described below. | ||||||
| 2024-12-31 | 2025-03-14 | described here | NOT effective | NOT effective | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · From time to time, we may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently aware of any such proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Item 9A · ICFR · In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses described below on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, Repligen Corporation (the Company) has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on the COSO criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2024, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of such date due to material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, as described below. | ||||||
| 2023-12-31 | 2024-02-22 | described here | NOT effective | NOT effective | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · From time to time, we may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently aware of any such proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Item 9A · ICFR · In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described below on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, Repligen Corporation (the Company) has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on the COSO criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2023, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of such date due to a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, as described below. | ||||||
| 2022-12-31 | 2023-02-22 | described here | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · From time to time, we may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently aware of any such proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Item 9A · ICFR · Subject to the foregoing, based on this assessment, our management concluded that, as of December 31, 2022, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level. | ||||||
| 2021-12-31 | 2022-02-17 | described here | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · From time to time, we may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently aware of any such proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Item 9A · ICFR · Subject to the foregoing, based on this assessment, our management concluded that, as of December 31, 2021, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.