| Size & multiples | |||
| Market Cap | $11.74B | Enterprise Value | $11.92B |
| P/E (TTM) | 44.65× | PEG (trailing) | — |
| P/S | 12.38× | P/FCF | 63.36× |
| EV/EBITDA | 38.50× | EV/EBIT | 76.45× |
| EV/Sales | 12.57× | EV/FCF | 64.32× |
| FCF Yield | 1.58% | Buyback Yield | 0.20% |
| Owner Earnings (TTM) | $283.4M | Owner Earnings Yield | 2.41% |
| Shareholder Yield | — | ||
| Cost of capital & EVAmethodology → | |||
| Beta (5y monthly) | 1.79 | Risk-free (assumed) | 4.00% |
| Equity risk premium (assumed) | 5.00% | Cost of Equity | 12.94% |
| After-tax Cost of Debt | 2.86% | Synthetic credit rating | A+ |
| Cost of Debt · embedded (pre-tax) | 2.86% | Cost of Debt · marginal (synthetic) | 4.70% |
| WACC | 12.21% | ROIC | 16.82% |
| EVA Spread (ROIC−WACC) | 4.61% | EVA | $46.7M |
FCF sits 35% below owner earnings — spending above maintenance (growth capex) or absorbing working capital, so FCF understates the steady-state cash the business throws off.
Synthetic rating = ICR-based credit-quality read (Damodaran), not an agency rating.
Flows TTM (last 4 quarters); latest annual for: EPS (Diluted) · EPS TTM $2.52 · revenue TTM $948.6M · FCF TTM $185.3M
Output of a disclosed model whose assumptions may be wrong — research information, not investment advice. See the Disclaimer.
Rich vs Information Technology on P/E, EV/EBITDA
P/E 62nd · EV/EBITDA 82nd percentile in the Information Technology pool — placement read per multiple; the API emits no single blended figure, so none is shown.
Compared against all 842 Information Technology names we cover — one sector-wide pool, so the median skews toward smaller (often unprofitable) companies. Try the Size band for a cap-matched read.
| Metric | This (FY) | Peer median | IQR (25–75) | %ile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 44.6x | 34.1x | 17.5x–62.7x | 62 ↑rich |
| EV/EBITDA | 43.4x | 19.2x | 10.0x–35.3x | 82 ↑rich |
| FCF Yield | 1.5% | 2.4% | -2.9%–6.0% | 43 ↓weak |
| Net Margin | 28.8% | 1.6% | -21.8%–12.7% | 91 ↑strong |
| Operating Margin | 17.4% | 1.6% | -23.3%–13.0% | 82 ↑strong |