SolarWindow Technologies, Inc. WNDW US Equity
SolarWindow Technologies, Inc. (OTC: WNDW), an SEC filer in Industrial Organic Chemicals, closed at $1.31, -28.8%, on 2026-08-28, with a market cap of $121M as of 2026-08-27 and a return on equity of -40.6%. Institutional ownership, earnings history and filed financials are on the tabs below.
Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-31 | 2025-11-13 | as filed | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are not party to nor are we aware of any material pending lawsuit, litigation or proceeding. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment, Management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of August 31, 2025. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, Management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of August 31, 2025. | ||||||
| 2024-08-31 | 2024-11-20 | as filed | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are not party to nor are we aware of any material pending lawsuit, litigation or proceeding. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment, Management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of August 31, 2024. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, Management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of August 31, 2024. | ||||||
| 2023-08-31 | 2023-11-21 | as filed | not extracted | not extracted | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are not party to nor are we aware of any material pending lawsuit, litigation or proceeding. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment, Management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of August 31, 2023. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, Management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of August 31, 2023. Item 9A · material weakness · Background As of our fiscal year ended August 31, 2022, and through our third quarter ended May 31, 2023, Management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was ineffective due to control deficiencies at the subsidiary level that constituted material weaknesses. | ||||||
| 2022-08-31 | 2023-08-30 | as filed | NOT effective | NOT effective | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are not party to nor are we aware of any material pending lawsuit, litigation or proceeding. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective on August 31, 2022 because of the material weaknesses described below. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, our Acting Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures at the subsidiary level were not effective at a reasonable assurance level as of August 31, 2022, as discussed and defined in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting referred to below. | ||||||
| 2021-08-31 | 2021-11-04 | as filed | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are not party to nor are we aware of any material pending lawsuit, litigation or proceeding. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria as of August 31, 2021. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of August 31, 2021. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.