| Size & multiples | |||
| Market Cap | $2.61B | Enterprise Value | $95.3M |
| P/E (TTM) | 1.20× | PEG (trailing) | — |
| P/S | 0.65× | P/FCF | 11.52× |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.29× | EV/EBIT | 1.09× |
| EV/Sales | 0.02× | EV/FCF | 0.42× |
| FCF Yield | 8.68% | Buyback Yield | — |
| Owner Earnings (TTM) | $7.19B | Owner Earnings Yield | 275.93% |
| Shareholder Yield | — | ||
| Cost of capital & EVAmethodology → | |||
| Beta (5y monthly) | — | Risk-free (assumed) | 4.00% |
| Equity risk premium (assumed) | 5.00% | Cost of Equity | — |
| After-tax Cost of Debt | — | Synthetic credit rating | D |
| Cost of Debt · embedded (pre-tax) | — | Cost of Debt · marginal (synthetic) | 23.00% |
| WACC | — | ROIC | 0.88% |
| EVA Spread (ROIC−WACC) | — | EVA | — |
FCF sits 97% below owner earnings — spending above maintenance (growth capex) or absorbing working capital, so FCF understates the steady-state cash the business throws off.
Synthetic rating = ICR-based credit-quality read (Damodaran), not an agency rating.
Flows TTM (last 4 quarters); latest annual for: EPS (Diluted) · EPS TTM $9.63 · revenue TTM $4.00B · FCF TTM $226.2M
Output of a disclosed model whose assumptions may be wrong — research information, not investment advice. See the Disclaimer.
Cheap vs Information Technology on P/E; rich on EV/EBITDA
P/E 1st · EV/EBITDA 67th percentile in the Information Technology pool — placement read per multiple; the API emits no single blended figure, so none is shown.
Compared against all 842 Information Technology names we cover — one sector-wide pool, so the median skews toward smaller (often unprofitable) companies. Try the Size band for a cap-matched read.
| Metric | This (FY) | Peer median | IQR (25–75) | %ile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 1.2x | 32.8x | 17.9x–61.7x | 1 ↓cheap |
| EV/EBITDA | 28.1x | 18.6x | 9.6x–33.8x | 67 ↑rich |
| FCF Yield | 9.7% | 2.5% | -3.1%–6.0% | 87 ↑strong |
| Net Margin | 118.2% | 1.6% | -21.8%–12.7% | 99 ↑strong |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | 1.6% | -23.3%–13.0% | 52 ↑strong |
