Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following analysis is intended to provide the reader with a further understanding of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company and its operating subsidiaries for the periods shown. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with other sections of this Report on Form 10-K, including Part I, “Item 1. Business,” and Part II, “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” A detailed discussion comparing 2020 and 2019 results is incorporated herein by reference to Item 7 of the Company's 2020 annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 1, 2021.
Overview
Tompkins Financial Corporation (“Tompkins” or the “Company”) is headquartered in Ithaca, New York and is registered as a Financial Holding Company with the Federal Reserve Board under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. The Company is a locally oriented, community-based financial services organization that offers a full array of products and services, including commercial and consumer banking, leasing, trust and investment management, financial planning and wealth management, and insurance services.At December 31, 2021, the Company’s subsidiaries included: four wholly-owned banking subsidiaries, Tompkins Trust Company (the “Trust Company”), The Bank of Castile (DBA Tompkins Bank of Castile), Mahopac Bank (DBA Tompkins Mahopac Bank), and VIST Bank (DBA Tompkins VIST Bank). Effective January 1, 2022, the Company’s four wholly-owned banking subsidiaries were combined into one bank, with The Bank of Castile, Mahopac Bank, and VIST Bank merging with and into the Trust Company with the Trust Company as the surviving institution. Following the merger, the Trust Company changed its name to "Tompkins Community Bank." The Company also has a wholly-owned insurance agency subsidiary, Tompkins Insurance Agencies, Inc. (“Tompkins Insurance”). Tompkins Community Bank provides a full array of trust and investment services under the Tompkins Financial Advisors brand, including investment management, trust and estate, financial and tax planning as well as life, disability and long-term care insurance services. The Company’s principal offices are located at 118 E. Seneca Street, Ithaca, NY, 14850, and its telephone number is (888) 503-5753. The Company’s common stock is traded on the NYSE American under the Symbol “TMP.”
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The statements contained in this Report that are not statements of historical fact may include forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements may be identified by use of such words as "may", "will", "estimate", "intend", "continue", "believe", "expect", "plan", or "anticipate", the negative and other variations of these terms and other similar words. Examples of forward-looking statements may include statements regarding the asset quality of the Company's loan portfolios; the level of the Company's allowance for credit losses; whether, when and how borrowers will repay deferred amounts and resume scheduled payments; the sufficiency of liquidity sources; the Company's exposure to changes in interest rates, and to new, changed, or extended government/regulatory expectations; the impact of changes in accounting standards; and trends, plans, prospects, growth and strategies. Forward-looking statements are made based on management’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events impacting the Company and are subject to certain uncertainties and factors relating to the Company’s operations and economic environment, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the control of the Company, that could cause actual results of the Company to differ materially from those expressed and/or implied by forward-looking statements and historical performance. The following factors, in addition to those listed as Risk Factors in Item 1A are among those that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements: changes in general economic, market and regulatory conditions; the severity and duration of the COVID-19 outbreak and the impact of the outbreak (including the government’s response to the outbreak) on economic
28
Table of Contents
and financial markets and our borrowers, potential regulatory actions, and modifications to our operations, products, and services relating thereto; disruptions in our and our customers’ operations and loss of revenue due to pandemics, epidemics, widespread health emergencies, government-imposed travel/business restrictions, or outbreaks of infectious diseases such as the COVID-19, and the associated adverse impact on our financial position, liquidity, and our customers’ abilities or willingness to repay their obligations to us or willingness to obtain financial services products from the Company; a decision to amend or modify the terms under which our customers are obligated to repay amounts owed to us; the development of an interest rate environment that may adversely affect the Company’s interest rate spread, other income or cash flow anticipated from the Company’s operations, investment and/or lending activities; changes in laws and regulations affecting banks, bank holding companies and/or financial holding companies, such as the Dodd-Frank Act and Basel III and the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act; legislative and regulatory changes in response to COVID-19 with which we and our subsidiaries must comply, including the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (the "CARES Act") and the Appropriation Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and federal, state and local government mandates; technological developments and changes; the ability to continue to introduce competitive new products and services on a timely, cost-effective basis; governmental and public policy changes, including environmental regulation; reliance on large customers; changes in business prospects that could impact goodwill and other intangible assets; fluctuations in market interest rates; uncertainties arising from national and global events, including the potential impact of widespread protests, civil unrest, and political uncertainty on the economy and the financial services industry; and financial resources in the amounts, at the times and on the terms required to support the Company’s future businesses.
Critical Accounting Policies
The accounting and reporting policies followed by the Company conform, in all material respects, to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") and to general practices within the financial services industry. In the course of normal business activity, management must select and apply many accounting policies and methodologies and make estimates and assumptions that lead to the financial results presented in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. There are uncertainties inherent in making these estimates and assumptions, which could materially affect the Company’s results of operations and financial position.
Management considers accounting estimates to be critical to reported financial results if (i) the accounting estimates require management to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain, and (ii) different estimates that management reasonably could have used for the accounting estimate in the current period, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, could have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. Management considers the accounting policies relating to the allowance for credit losses (“allowance”, or “ACL”), and the review of the securities portfolio for other-than-temporary impairment to be critical accounting policies because of the uncertainty and subjectivity involved in these policies and the material effect that estimates related to these areas can have on the Company’s results of operations.
The Company’s methodology for estimating the allowance considers available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows, including information about past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Refer to “Allowance for Credit Losses” below, "Note 4 - Allowance for Credit Losses", and "Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.
For information on the Company's significant accounting policies and to gain a greater understanding of how the Company’s financial performance is reported, refer to "Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The Company's significant accounting policies conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") and are described in Note 1 of Notes to Financial Statements. In applying those accounting policies, management of the Company is required to exercise judgment in determining many of the methodologies, assumptions and estimates to be utilized. Certain critical accounting estimates are more dependent on such judgment and in some cases may contribute to volatility in the Company's reported financial performance should the assumptions and estimates used change over time due to changes in circumstances. The more significant area in which management of the Company apply critical assumptions and estimates include the following:
29
Table of Contents
•Accounting for credit losses - Effective January 1, 2020 the Company adopted amended accounting guidance that impacts how the allowance for credit losses is determined. Under the new accounting guidance, the allowance for credit losses represents a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of certain financial assets, including loans and leases, to present the net amount expected to be collected at the balance sheet date. A provision for credit losses is recorded to adjust the level of the allowance as deemed necessary by management. In estimating expected losses in the loan and lease portfolio, borrower-specific financial data and macro-economic assumptions are utilized to project losses over a reasonable and supportable forecast period. For certain loan pools that share similar risk characteristics, the Company utilizes statistically developed models to estimate amounts and timing of expected future cash flows, collateral values and other factors used to determine the borrowers' abilities to repay obligations. Such models consider historical correlations of credit losses with various macroeconomic assumptions including unemployment and gross domestic product. These forecasts may be adjusted for inherent limitations or biases of the models. Subsequent to the forecast period, the Company utilizes longer-term historical loss experience to estimate losses over the remaining contractual life of the loans. Prior to 2020, the allowance for credit losses represented the amount that in management's judgment reflected incurred credit losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio as of the balance sheet date. The estimation of the allowance for credit losses prior to 2020 did not consider reasonable and supportable forecasts that could have affected the collectability of the reported amounts. Changes in the circumstances considered when determining management's estimates and assumptions could result in changes in those estimates and assumptions, which could result in adjustment of the allowance for credit losses in future periods. A discussion of facts and circumstances considered by management in determining the allowance for credit losses is included herein in Note 4 of Notes to Financial Statements.
COVID-19 Pandemic and Recent Events
The COVID-19 global pandemic continued to present health and economic challenges in 2021. During the year, the Company continued to focus on the health and well-being of its workforce, meeting its clients' needs, and supporting its communities. During the initial phases of the pandemic, the Company designated a Pandemic Planning Committee, which includes key individuals across the Company as well as members of Senior Management, to oversee the Company’s response to COVID-19, and implemented a number of risk mitigation measures designed to protect our employees and customers while maintaining services for our customers and community. These measures included restrictions on business travel, establishment of a hybrid work environment for most non-customer facing employees, and social distancing restrictions for those employees working at our offices and branch locations. In September 2021, New York State activated the HERO Act and the Company has adopted business practices consistent with the changing regulations there under.
Tompkins continues to offer, on a limited basis, assistance to its customers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic by implementing a payment deferral program to assist both consumer and business borrowers that may be experiencing financial hardship due to COVID-19. Our standard program allowed for the deferral of loan payments for up to 90 days; in certain cases we extended additional deferrals or other accommodations. As part of this program, the Company deferred approximately 3,800 loans totaling $1.6 billion. As of December 31, 2020, loans totaling about $1.4 billion had moved out of the deferral status and returned to payment status. As of December 31, 2021, total loans that continued in a deferral status amounted to approximately $4.5 million, representing 0.09% of total loans. Loans in the deferral program continue to accrue interest during the deferral period unless otherwise classified as nonperforming. The provisions of the CARES Act and the interagency guidance issued by Federal banking regulators provided clarification related to modifications and deferral programs to assist borrowers who are negatively impacted by the COVID-19 national emergency. The guidance and clarifications detail certain provisions whereby banks are permitted to make deferrals and modifications to the terms of a loan which would not require the loan to be reported as a troubled debt restructuring ("TDR"). In accordance with the CARES Act and the interagency guidance, the Company elected to adopt the provisions to not report qualified loan modifications as TDRs. The relief related to TDRs under the CARES Act was extended by the Appropriation Act. Under the Appropriations Act, relief under the CARES Act continued until January 1, 2022.
Management continues to monitor credit conditions carefully at the individual borrower level, as well as by industry segment, in order to be responsive to changing credit conditions. It is difficult to assess whether a customer that continues to experience COVID-19 related financial hardship will be able to perform under the original terms of the loan once the deferral period ends. Any such inability to perform may result in increases in past due and nonperforming loans. The balance of loans in deferral as of December 31, 2021 reflects a continued decrease, resulting in immaterial industry concentrations as a percentage of each loan segment.
The Company also participated in the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”). This program provides borrower guarantees for lenders, and envisions a certain amount of loan forgiveness for loan recipients
30
Table of Contents
who properly utilize funds, all in accordance with the rules and regulations established by the SBA for the PPP. The Company began accepting applications for PPP loans on April 3, 2020, and had funded 2,998 loans totaling about $465.6 million when the initial program ended. On January 19, 2021, the Company began accepting both first draw and second draw applications for the reopening of the PPP program. The 2021 PPP program funding closed for new applications on May 12, 2021. The Company funded 2,142 PPP loan applications totaling $228.5 million in 2021.
Out of the total $694.1 million of PPP loans that the Company had funded through January 14, 2022, approximately $620.2 million had been forgiven by the SBA under the terms of the program. Total net deferred fees on the remaining balance of PPP loans amounted to $3.0 million at December 31, 2021.
Results of Operations
(Comparison of December 31, 2021 and 2020 results)
General
The Company reported diluted earnings per share of $6.05 in 2021, an increase of 16.4% compared to diluted earnings per share of $5.20 in 2020. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2021, was $89.3 million, an increase of 15.1% compared to $77.6 million in 2020. Earnings performance in 2021 compared to 2020 benefited from growth in noninterest income sources, including insurance, wealth management and card services income and lower provisions for credit losses. Provision expense for the year ended December 31, 2021 was a credit of $2.2 million, compared to an expense of $17.2 million for 2020. The provision for credit losses in 2020 included a provision expense of $16.8 million in the first quarter related to the impact of the economic condition related to COVID-19. Earnings in 2021 also included a $1.9 million ($0.10 per share) purchase accounting charge related to the redemption of $15.2 million in trust preferred securities and $2.9 million ($0.15 per share) in penalties related to the prepayment of $135.0 million in FHLB fixed rate advances.
In addition to earnings per share, key performance measurements for the Company include return on average shareholders’ equity (ROE) and return on average assets (ROA). ROE was 12.32% in 2021, compared to 11.09% in 2020, while ROA was 1.12% in 2021 and 1.05% in 2020. Tompkins’ 2021 ROE compared favorably with peer ratios of 12.18% for ROE, while ROA trailed by 15 basis points when compared to peer ROA of 1.27%. The peer group data is derived from the FRB's "Bank Holding Company Performance Report", which covers banks and bank holding companies with assets between $3.0 billion and $10.0 billion as of September 30, 2021 (the most recent report available). Although the peer group data is presented based upon financial information that is one fiscal quarter behind the financial information included in this report, the Company believes that it is relevant to include certain peer group information for comparison to current period numbers.
Segment Reporting
The Company operates in three business segments: banking, insurance and wealth management. Insurance is comprised of property and casualty insurance services and employee benefit consulting operated under the Tompkins Insurance, subsidiary. Wealth management activities include the results of the Company’s trust, financial planning, and wealth management services provided by Tompkins Financial Advisors, a division of Tompkins Community Bank. All other activities are considered banking. For additional financial information on the Company’s segments, refer to “Note 22 Segment and Related Information“ in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report.
Banking Segment
The banking segment reported net income of $77.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, representing an $8.7 million or 12.5%, increase compared to 2020. The increase in net income in 2021 compared to 2020 was largely driven by a decrease in the provision for credit losses. Net interest income decreased $1.6 million or 0.7% in 2021 compared to 2020. Net interest income in 2021 included a $1.9 million purchase accounting charge related to the redemption of $15.2 million in trust preferred securities. Interest income decreased $13.0 million or 5.1% compared to 2020, while interest expense decreased $11.5 million or 39.5%.
31
Table of Contents
The provision for credit loss expense was a credit of $2.2 million in 2021, compared to provision expense of $17.2 million in the prior year. The first quarter of 2020 included provision expense of $16.8 million related to the impact of the economic conditions due to COVID-19 on economic forecasts and other model assumptions relied upon by management in determining the allowance, and reflects the calculation of the allowance for credit losses in accordance with ASU 2016-13 Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326 ): Measurement of Credit Losses on financial Instruments, and its related amendments. Improved credit quality and improving macroeconomic trends in 2021 compared to 2020 contributed to a lower allowance for credit losses at year-end 2021 compared to year-end 2020. For additional information, see the section titled "The Allowance for Credit Losses" below.
Noninterest income of $25.9 million in 2021 was flat compared to 2020. Noninterest expense of $152.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, increased $4.9 million or 3.3% from 2020. The year-to-date increase in noninterest expense was mainly attributed to $2.9 million in penalties related to a prepayment of $135.0 million in FHLB advances, merger related expenses, and salary and wages and employee benefits reflecting normal annual merit adjustments.
Insurance Segment
The insurance segment reported net income of $6.3 million, an increase of $1.9 million or 43.3% when compared to 2020, as a $3.5 million or 11.0% increase in noninterest revenue was only partially offset by a $916,000 or 3.5% increase in expenses. The increase in revenue included $1.9 million or 8.8% growth in property and casualty commissions and a $1.1 million or 34.6% increase in contingency revenue over 2020. Health and voluntary benefits were $97,000 or 1.3% less than 2020 while life, financial services and other revenue was $53,000 or 17.0% more than 2020. Revenue growth in 2021 benefited from business development efforts and generally higher policy premium levels.
Noninterest revenue for 2021 included a non-recurring receipt from the proceeds of an officer life insurance policy in the amount of $140.000. The increase in expenses was mainly attributable to an increase in wages reflecting normal annual merit increases along with commissions and incentives related to the increase in commission revenue partially offset by an overall decrease in health insurance costs. Certain expenses such as auto, travel, entertainment and marketing which have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic resulting in reductions during 2020 increased slightly in 2021.
Wealth Management Segment
The wealth management segment reported net income of $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, an increase of $1.1 million or 28.4% compared to 2020. Revenue of $19.7 million increased $1.6 million or 8.8% compared to 2020, mainly a result of increased assets under management and advisory revenue. We saw strong market performance throughout the year which helped revenue year over year. Noninterest expenses remained relatively flat year over year increasing by 1.1%. Increases in salary and wages were mostly offset by small savings in various other operating expenses. The fair value of assets under management or in custody at December 31, 2021 totaled $5.1 billion, an increase of 13.6% compared to year-end 2020. This figure included $1.7 billion at year-end 2021, of Company-owned securities from which no income was recognized as the Trust Company was serving as custodian.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is the Company’s largest source of revenue, representing 74.0% of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2021, and 75.3% of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2020. Net interest income is dependent on the volume and composition of interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the level of market interest rates. Table 1 – Average Statements of Condition and Net Interest Analysis shows average interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and the corresponding yield or cost associated with each.
Tax-equivalent net interest income for 2021 decreased by $2.0 million or 0.9% from 2020. The decrease resulted mainly from the decrease in average asset yields more than offsetting the growth in average earning assets and lower average funding costs. Funding costs benefited from lower market rates in 2021 compared to 2020 as well the mix of funding sources, including an increase in average noninterest bearing deposits. Average total deposits represented 94.5% of average total liabilities in 2021 compared to 91.7% in 2020, while total average borrowings represented 3.0% of average total liabilities in 2021 and 5.5% in 2020. Average earning assets in 2021 increased 11.0% over 2020, while average asset yields for 2021 decreased 54 basis points compared to 2020. The net interest margin for 2021 was 2.96% compared to 3.31% for 2020. The decline in net interest margin for 2021 when compared to 2020 was mainly due to lower securities yields as well as a slight shift in the composition of average earning assets, with a greater mix of lower yielding securities and interest bearing balances, and a decrease in average loan balances reflecting lower PPP loan balances.
32
Table of Contents
Tax-equivalent interest income decreased $13.5 million or 5.3% in 2021 from 2020. The decrease in tax-equivalent interest income was mainly due to lower asset yields, partially offset by an increase in the volume of average earning assets. Average asset yields for 2021 decreased 54 basis points compared to 2020, mainly driven by the decrease in market interest rates as well as the growth in lower yielding securities and interest bearing balances. Average loans and leases decreased $43.6 million or 0.8% in 2021 compared to 2020, and represented 68.0% of average earning assets in 2021 compared to 76.1% in 2020. As a result of its participation in the SBA's PPP, the Company recorded net deferred loan fees of $11.2 million in 2021 and $9.2 million in 2020, which are included in interest income. The average yield on loans was 4.16% in 2021, a decrease of 22 basis points compared to 4.38% in 2020. Average balances on securities increased $693.5 million or 48.6% in 2021 compared to 2020, while the average yield on the securities portfolio decreased 60 basis points or 32.8% compared to 2020 due to lower market interest rates.
Interest expense for 2021 decreased $11.5 million or 39.6% compared to 2020, driven mainly by lower funding costs and decreases in average balances on borrowings. Interest expense in 2021 included a $1.9 million purchase accounting charge related to the redemption of $15.2 million in trust preferred securities in 2021. The average cost of interest bearing deposits was 0.23% in 2021, a decrease of 23 basis points from 0.46% in 2020, while the average cost of interest bearing liabilities decreased to 0.35% in 2021 from 0.60% in 2020. Average interest bearing deposits in 2021 increased $392.0 million or 9.0% compared to 2020. Average noninterest bearing deposit balances in 2021 increased $343.3 million or 19.6% over 2020 and represented 30.6% of average total deposits in 2021 compared to 28.7% in 2020. Average total deposits were up $735.3 million or 12.0% in 2021 over 2020. Average deposit balances continue to benefit from the PPP loan program, as the majority of the proceeds of the PPP loans funded by Tompkins during 2020 and the first half of 2021 were deposited in Tompkins checking accounts. Additionally, consumer deposit balances benefited from other government stimulus programs. Average other borrowings decreased by $147.9 million or 40.5% in 2021 from 2020. The decrease in borrowings was due to continued strong deposit growth during 2021 which allowed for reductions in FHLB borrowings. In September 2021, the Company prepaid $135.0 million of fixed rate FHLB advances, incurring prepayment penalties of $2.9 million. The advances carried a weighted average rate of 2.26% and had a weighted average maturity of 1.25 years.
33
Table of Contents
Table 1 - Average Statements of Condition and Net Interest Analysis
For the year ended December 31,
ASSETS
Interest-earning assets
Securities1
LIABILITIES & EQUITY
Deposits
Interest-bearing deposits
1 Average balances and yields on available-for-sale debt securities are based on historical amortized cost.
2 Interest income includes the tax effects of tax-equivalent adjustments using the Federal income tax rate of 21.0% in 2021, 2020, and 2019 to increase tax exempt interest income to tax-equivalent basis.
3 Nonaccrual loans are included in the average asset totals presented above. Payments received on nonaccrual loans have been recognized as disclosed in Note 1 of the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in Part 1 of this annual report on Form 10-K.
34
Table of Contents
Table 2 - Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income
(In thousands)(tax-equivalent) Volume Yield/Rate Total Volume Yield/Rate Total
INTEREST INCOME:
Investments1
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Interest-bearing deposits:
1 Interest income includes the tax effects of tax-equivalent adjustments using the Federal income tax rate of 21.0% in 2021, 2020 and 2019 to increase tax exempt interest income to tax-equivalent basis.
Changes in net interest income occur from a combination of changes in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and in the rate of interest earned or paid on them. The above table illustrates changes in interest income and interest expense attributable to changes in volume (change in average balance multiplied by prior year rate), changes in rate (change in rate multiplied by prior year volume), and the net change in net interest income. The net change attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate has been allocated to each in proportion to the absolute dollar amounts of the change. In 2021, net interest income decreased by $2.0 million, resulting from a $11.5 million decrease in interest expense, offset by a $13.5 million decrease in interest income. Lower yields on average earning assets reduced interest income by $21.0 million, while the increase in average balances on interest-earning assets increased interest income by $7.5 million. The decrease in interest expense reflects lower rates paid on interest bearing liabilities, both deposits and other borrowings and a decrease in average borrowings. Lower rates on deposits and borrowing, reduced interest expense by $8.5 million, while lower balances reduced interest expense by $2.9 million.
Provision for Credit Loss Expense
The provision for credit loss expense represents management’s estimate of the expense necessary to maintain the allowance for credit losses at an appropriate level. Relatively stable credit conditions and improving macroeconomic trends contributed to a lower allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2021 when compared to December 31, 2020. The ratio of total allowance to total loans and leases decreased to 0.84% at December 31, 2021 from 0.98% at December 31, 2020. The provision for credit loss expense was a credit of $2.2 million in 2021, compared to provision expense of $17.2 million in 2020. The provision for credit losses for 2021 included a provision of $586,000 related to off-balance sheet credit exposures compared to a provision of $1.1 million, respectively, for 2020. The first quarter of 2020 included a provision expense of $16.8 million related to the impact of COVID-19 on economic forecasts and other model assumptions relied upon by management in determining the allowance, and reflects the calculation of the allowance for credit losses in accordance with ASU 2016-13. The fourth quarter of 2021 included a $7.0 million charge-off of a commercial real estate relationship consisting of two loans that were previously reported as nonperforming loans. The section captioned “Financial Condition – The Allowance for Credit Losses” below has further details on the allowance for credit losses and asset quality metrics.
35
Table of Contents
Noninterest Income
Year ended December 31,
Net gain on securities transactions 249 443 645
Noninterest income of $78.8 million in 2021 increased $5.0 million or 6.8% over 2020, reflecting growth in insurance commissions and fees, investment services and card services income. Noninterest income represented 26.1% of total revenues in 2021, and 24.7% in 2020.
Insurance commissions and fees of $34.8 million increased $3.3 million or 10.6% compared to $31.5 million for 2020. The increase in insurance commissions and fees in 2021 over 2020 was due to $1.9 million or 8.8% of organic growth in property and casualty commissions, and an increase of $1.1 million or 35.0% in contingency revenue over 2020.
Investment services income of $19.4 million increased $1.9 million or 10.7% in 2021 compared to 2020, mainly due to an increase in advisory fee income resulting from the growth in assets under management, driven by new business and an increase in fair value due to favorable market conditions. Investment services income includes trust services, financial planning, wealth management services, and brokerage related services. The fair value of assets managed by, or in custody of, Tompkins was $5.1 billion at December 31, 2021, an increase from $4.4 billion at December 31, 2020. The fair value of assets in custody at December 31, 2021 and 2020 includes $1.7 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively, of Company-owned securities where the Trust Company is custodian.
Service charges on deposit accounts in 2021 were in line with prior year. Net overdraft fees are the largest component of service charges on deposit accounts, and decreased $120,000 or 3.4% in 2021 compared to 2020. The decreases in overdraft/insufficient funds charges during 2021 were primarily related to a decrease in the volume of overdrafts relative to 2020. Service fees on personal and business accounts, increased $77,000 or 3.1% in 2021 over 2020.
Card services income increased $1.6 million or 16.9% over 2020. The primary components of card services income are fees related to interchange income and transactions fees for debit card transactions, credit card transactions and ATM usage. The increase in card services income in 2021, when compared to 2020, is s result of higher transaction volumes, which benefited from the easement of pandemic-related travel and business restrictions in 2021.
Other income of $7.2 million decreased $1.6 million or 18.3% compared to 2020. The decrease was largely due to gains on sales of residential mortgage loans of $2.0 million in 2020, compared to gains of $943,000 in 2021, due to a higher volume of loans sold and higher premiums paid on loans sold in 2020.
Noninterest Expense
Year ended December 31,
36
Table of Contents
Noninterest expense as a percentage of total revenue was 62.9% in 2021, compared to 61.6% in 2020.
Expenses associated with salaries and wages and employee benefits are the largest component of total noninterest expense. In 2021, these expenses increased $2.9 million or 2.5% compared to 2021. Salaries and wages increased $3.5 million or 3.8% in 2021 over the prior year, mainly as a result of annual merit pay increases. Other employee benefits decreased $640,000 or 2.6% over 2020, mainly in health insurance, which was down $1.1 million or 10.7% in 2021 over 2020. The number of employees as measured by average full time equivalents (FTEs) for 2021 were 1,032, decreased from 1,057 for 2020.
Other operating expenses of $44.5 million increased by $2.2 million or 5.1% compared to 2020. The primary components of other operating expenses in 2021 were technology expense ($11.7 million), professional fees ($6.9 million), marketing expense ($4.3 million), and cardholder expense ($3.5 million). The increase in other operating expenses in 2021 compared to 2020 included a nonrecurring $2.9 million prepayment penalty, related to pay down of $135.0 million of FHLB fixed rate advances, along with professional fees (up $855,000 or 14.1%), and cardholder expense (up $280,000 or 8.6%). These increases were partially offset by decreases in marketing related expenses in 2021 over 2020 (down $431,000 or 9.1%). The FHLB advances, which were paid off in September 2021, carried a weighted average interest rate of 2.26% and had a weighted average maturity of 1.25 years.
Noncontrolling Interests
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests represents the portion of net income in consolidated majority-owned subsidiaries that is attributable to the minority owners of a subsidiary. The Company had net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $127,000 in 2021, down $27,000 from 2020. The noncontrolling interests relate to three real estate investment trusts, which are substantially owned by the Company’s New York banking subsidiaries.
Income Tax Expense
The provision for income taxes provides for Federal, New York State, Pennsylvania and other miscellaneous state income taxes. The 2021 provision was $25.2 million, which increased $5.3 million or 26.4% compared to the 2020 provision. The effective tax rate for the Company was 22.0% in 2021, up from 20.4% in 2020. The effective rates for 2021 and 2020 differed from the U.S. statutory rate of 21.0% during those periods due to the effect of tax-exempt income from loans, securities, and life insurance assets, investments in tax credits, and excess tax benefits of stock based compensation. The increase in the effective tax rate for 2021 over 2020 was due to a higher level of taxable income to total income.
The Company's banking subsidiary has an investment in a real estate investment trust that provides certain benefits on its New York State tax return for qualifying entities. A condition to claim the benefit is that the consolidated company has average assets of no more than $8 billion for the taxable year. As of December 31, 2021, the Company's consolidated average assets, as defined by New York tax law, were under the $8.0 billion threshold. The Company will continue to monitor the consolidated average assets during 2022 to determine future eligibility.
Financial Condition
Total assets were $7.8 billion at December 31, 2021, increasing by 2.6% or $197.8 million from the previous year end. The increase in total assets was mainly due to increases in securities. Total securities increased $701.3 million or 43.1% over December 31, 2020. Total deposits at year-end 2021 increased $353.7 million or 5.5% over year-end 2020.
Loans and leases were 64.9% of total assets at December 31, 2021, compared to 69.0% of total assets at December 31, 2020. Total loan balances were $5.1 billion at December 31, 2021, a decrease of $184.9 million or 3.5% compared to the $5.2 billion reported at year-end 2020. The decrease is mainly due to PPP loan balances being forgiven as part of the SBA program. PPP loan balances totaled $71.3 million at year-end 2021, compared to $291.3 million at year-end 2020. A more detailed discussion of the loan portfolio is provided below in this section under the caption “Loans and Leases”.
As of December 31, 2021, total securities comprised 29.8% of total assets, compared to 21.4% of total assets at year-end 2020. Securities increased $701.3 million or 43.1% at December 31, 2021, compared to December 31, 2020. The increase in securities from year-end 2020 was largely due to the investment of excess liquidity into securities. A detailed discussion of the securities portfolio is provided below in this section under the caption “Securities”.
37
Table of Contents
Total deposits at year-end 2021 increased by $353.7 million or 5.5% compared to December 31, 2020. At December 31, 2021 noninterest bearing deposits increased by $206.2 million or 10.7%, time deposit balances decreased $106.6 million or 14.3% and checking, savings and money market accounts increased $254.1 million or 6.8% when compared to December 31, 2020. Other borrowings, consisting mainly of short term advances with the FHLB, decreased $141.0 million or 53.2% from December 31, 2020, as growth in deposits were used to reduce borrowings. A more detailed discussion of deposits and borrowings is provided below in this section under the caption “Deposits and Other Liabilities”.
Shareholders’ Equity
The Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity included in the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company contained in Part II, Item 8. of this Report, detail changes in equity capital over prior year end. Total shareholders’ equity increased $11.3 million or 1.6% to $728.9 million at December 31, 2021, from $717.7 million at December 31, 2020. Additional paid-in capital decreased by $21.4 million, from $334.0 million at December 31, 2020, to $312.5 million at December 31, 2021. The $21.4 million decrease included the following: a $23.8 million aggregate purchase price related to the Company's repurchase and retirement of 304,513 shares of its common stock in connection with Board-approved repurchase plans, and $3.1 million related to the exercise of stock options and restricted stock activity. These were partially offset by $5.1 million attributed to stock based compensation expense, and $257,000 related to shares issued for the Company's director deferred compensation plan. Retained earnings increased by $56.8 million, reflecting net income of $89.3 million, less dividends paid of $32.4 million for year-ended December 31, 2021.
Accumulated other comprehensive loss increased from $32.1 million at December 31, 2020 to $56.0 million at December 31, 2021, reflecting a $35.2 million increase in unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities due to market interest rates, partially offset by a $11.3 million actuarial gain associated with employee benefit plans. Under regulatory requirements, amounts reported as accumulated other comprehensive income/loss related to net unrealized gain or loss on available-for-sale debt securities and the funded status of the Company’s defined benefit post-retirement benefit plans do not increase or reduce regulatory capital and are not included in the calculation of risk-based capital and leverage capital ratios.
Total shareholders’ equity increased $54.6 million or 8.2% to $717.7 million at December 31, 2020, from $663.1 million at December 31, 2019. Additional paid-in capital decreased by $4.5 million, from $338.5 million at December 31, 2019, to $334.0 million at December 31, 2020. The $4.5 million decrease included the following: $9.4 million aggregate purchase price related to the Company's repurchase and retirement of 127,690 shares of its common stock in connection with the 2020 Repurchase Plan and $1.9 million related to the exercise of stock options and restricted stock activity. These were partially offset by $4.7 million attributed to stock based compensation expense, $1.8 million related to shares issued in connection with the Company's dividend reinvestment program, and $255,000 related to shares issued for the Company's director deferred compensation plan. Retained earnings increased by $47.9 million, reflecting net income of $77.6 million, less dividends paid of $31.4 million and the net cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption of ASU 2016-13 of $1.7 million.
Accumulated other comprehensive loss decreased from $43.6 million at December 31, 2019 to $32.1 million at December 31, 2020; reflecting a $16.6 million increase in unrealized gains on available-for-sale debt securities due to market interest rates, and a $5.1 million increase in actuarial loss associated with employee benefit plans.
The Company continued its long history of increasing cash dividends with a per share increase of 4.3% in 2021, which followed an increase of 4.0% in 2020. Dividends per share were $2.19 in 2021, compared to $2.10 in 2020, and $2.02 in 2019. Cash dividends paid represented 36.3%, 40.4%, and 37.5% of after-tax net income in 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.
On January 30, 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase plan (the "2020 Repurchase Plan") for the Company to repurchase up to 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock over the 24 months following adoption of the plan. In the third quarter of 2021, the Company reached the 400,000 share limit under the 2020 Repurchase Plan; the 400,000 shares were purchased at an average price of $75.99.
On October 22, 2021, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase plan (the “2021 Repurchase Plan”) for the repurchase of up to 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock over the 24 months following adoption of the plan. Shares may be repurchased from time to time under the 2021 Repurchase Plan in open market transactions at prevailing market prices, in privately negotiated transactions, or by other means in accordance with federal securities laws, and the repurchase program may be suspended, modified or terminated by the Board of Directors at any time for any reason. Under the 2021 Repurchase Plan, the Company repurchased 32,203 shares through December 31, 2021, at an average cost of $80.65.
38
Table of Contents
The Company and its subsidiary bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal bank regulatory agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operation and financial condition. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action (PCA), banks must meet specific guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications of the Company and its subsidiary bank are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators concerning components, risk weightings, and other factors. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the maintenance of minimum amounts and ratios of common equity Tier 1 capital, Total capital and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets. Management believes that the Company and its subsidiary bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
In addition to setting higher minimum capital ratios, the Basel III Capital Rules introduced a capital conservation buffer, which must be added to each of the minimum capital ratios and is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. The capital conservation buffer was phased-in over a three year period that began on January 1, 2016, and was fully phased-in on January 1, 2019 at 2.5%.
As of December 31, 2021, the capital ratios for the Company’s four subsidiary banks exceeded the minimum levels required to be considered well capitalized. Effective January 1, 2022, the Company's four wholly-owned banking subsidiaries were combined into one bank, with the Bank of Castile, Mahopac Bank, and VIST Bank merging with and into Tompkins Trust Company. Immediately following the merger, Tompkins Trust Company changed its name to Tompkins Community Bank. Additional information on the Company’s capital ratios and regulatory requirements is provided in “Note 20 - Regulations and Supervision” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report on Form 10-K.
Securities
The Company maintains a portfolio of securities such as U.S. Treasuries, U.S. government sponsored entities securities, U.S. government agencies, non-U.S. Government agencies or sponsored entities mortgage-backed securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions thereof and equity securities. Management typically invests in securities with short to intermediate average lives in order to better match the interest rate sensitivities of its assets and liabilities. Investment decisions are made within policy guidelines established by the Company’s Board of Directors. The investment policy established by the Company’s Board of Directors is based on the asset/liability management goals of the Company, and is monitored by the Company’s Asset/Liability Management Committee. The intent of the policy is to establish a portfolio of high quality diversified securities, which optimizes net interest income within safety and liquidity limits deemed acceptable by the Asset/Liability Management Committee.
The Company classifies its securities at date of purchase as available-for-sale, held-to-maturity or trading. Securities, other than certain obligations of states and political subdivisions thereof, are generally classified as available-for-sale. Securities available-for-sale may be used to enhance total return, provide additional liquidity, or reduce interest rate risk. Securities in the held-to-maturity portfolio would consists of obligations of the U.S. Government, U.S. Government sponsored entities and obligations of state and political subdivisions. Securities in the trading portfolio would reflect those securities that the Company elects to account for at fair value, with the adoption of ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments.
The Company’s total securities portfolio at December 31, 2021 was $2.3 billion compared to $1.6 billion at December 31, 2020. The table below shows the composition of the available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities portfolios as of year-end 2021, 2020 and 2019. The increase in the available-for-sale portfolio at year-end 2021 over year-end 2020 reflects the reinvestment of excess liquidity. The Company purchased approximately $1.4 billion of securities in 2021, which were partially offset by $452.9 million of payments, maturities and calls and $142.7 million of sales of available-for-sale securities. In 2021, fair values were unfavorably impacted by changes in market interest rates.
Additional information on the securities portfolio is available in “Note 2 Securities” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report, which details the types of securities held, the carrying and fair values, and the contractual maturities as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.
39
Table of Contents
As of December 31,
Mortgage-backed securities-residential, issued by
As of December 31,
The Company evaluates available-for-sale debt securities for expected credit losses (“ECL”) in unrealized loss positions at each
measurement date to determine whether the decline in the fair value below the amortized cost basis (impairment) is due to
credit-related factors or noncredit-related factors.
Factors that may be indicative of ECL include, but are not limited to, the following:
•Extent to which the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis.
•Adverse conditions specifically related to the security, an industry, or geographic area (changes in technology, business practice).
•Payment structure of the debt security with respect to underlying issuer or obligor.
•Failure of the issuer to make scheduled payment of principal and/or interest.
•Changes to the rating of a security or issuer by a NRSRO.
•Changes in tax or regulatory guidelines that impact a security or underlying issuer.
For available-for-sale debt securities in an unrealized loss position, the Company evaluates the securities to determine whether the decline in the fair value below the amortized cost basis (technical impairment) is the result of changes in interest rates or reflects a fundamental change in the credit worthiness of the underlying issuer. Any impairment that is not credit related is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. Credit-related impairment is recognized as an allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) on the Statement of Condition, limited to the amount by which the amortized cost basis exceeds the fair value, with a corresponding adjustment to earnings. Both the ACL and the adjustment to net income may be reversed if conditions change.
The gross unrealized losses reported for residential mortgage-backed securities relate to investment securities issued by U.S. government sponsored entities such as Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("FHLMC"), and U.S. government agencies such as Government National Mortgage Association. The total gross unrealized losses, shown in the tables above, were primarily attributable to changes in interest rates and levels of market liquidity, relative to when the investment securities were purchased, and not due to the credit-related quality of the investment securities. The
40
Table of Contents
Company does not have the intent to sell these securities and does not believe it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these securities before a recovery of amortized cost.
Management measures expected credit losses on held-to-maturity debt securities on a collective basis by major security type with each type sharing similar risk characteristics and considers historical credit loss information that is adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Management has made the accounting policy election to exclude accrued interest receivable on held-to-maturity debt securities from the estimate of credit losses. As of December 31, 2021, the held-to- maturity portfolio consisted of U.S. Treasury securities and securities issued by U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, including The Federal National Mortgage Agency and the Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation. U.S. Treasury securities are backed by the full faith and credit of and/or guaranteed by the U.S. government, and it is expected that the securities will not be settled at prices less than the amortized cost bases of the securities. Securities issued by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises carry the explicit and/or implicit guarantee of the U.S. government, are widely recognized as “risk-free,” and have a long history of zero credit loss. As such, the Company did not record an allowance for credit losses for these securities as of December 31, 2021.
The Company also holds non-marketable Federal Home Loan Bank New York (“FHLBNY”) stock, non-marketable Federal Home Loan Bank Pittsburgh (“FHLBPITT”) stock and non-marketable Atlantic Community Bankers Bank (“ACBB”) stock, all of which are required to be held for regulatory purposes and for borrowing availability. The required investment in FHLB stock is tied to the Company’s borrowing levels with the FHLB. Holdings of FHLBNY stock, FHLBPITT stock and ACBB stock totaled $9.9 million, $1.0 million and $95,000 at December 31, 2021, respectively. These securities are carried at par, which is also cost. The FHLBNY and FHLBPITT continue to pay dividends and repurchase stock. As such, the Company has not recognized any impairment on its holdings of FHLBNY and FHLBPITT stock. At December 31, 2020, the Company’s holdings of FHLBNY stock, FHLBPITT stock, and ACBB stock totaled $11.0 million, $5.2 million, and $95,000, respectively.
Management’s policy is to purchase investment grade securities that, on average, have relatively short expected durations. This policy helps mitigate interest rate risk and provides sources of liquidity without significant risk to capital. The contractual maturity distribution of debt securities and mortgage-backed securities as of December 31, 2021, along with the weighted average yield of each category, is presented in Table 3-Maturity Distribution below. Balances are shown at amortized cost and weighted average yields are calculated on a fully tax-equivalent basis. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities presented in Table 3-Maturity Distribution below, because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalty and mortgage-backed securities will pay throughout the periods prior to contractual maturity.
41
Table of Contents
Table 3 - Maturity Distribution
Securities Available-for-Sale1 Securities Held-to-Maturity
(dollar amounts in thousands) Amount Yield2 Amount Yield2
U.S. Treasury
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities
Obligations of U.S. state and political subdivisions
Mortgage-backed securities - residential
Other securities
Total securities
1 Balances of available-for-sale debt securities are shown at amortized cost.
2 Interest income includes the tax effects of tax-equivalent adjustments using a combined New York State and Federal effective income tax rate of 24.5% to increase tax exempt interest income to tax-equivalent basis.
The average tax-equivalent yield on the securities portfolio was 1.23% in 2021, 1.83% in 2020 and 2.30% in 2019.
At December 31, 2021, there were no holdings of any one issuer, other than the U.S. Government sponsored entities, in an amount greater than 10% of the Company’s shareholders’ equity.
42
Table of Contents
Loans and Leases
Table 4 - Composition of Loan and Lease Portfolio
Loans and Leases As of December 31,
Commercial and industrial
Commercial real estate
Residential real estate
Consumer and other
Total loans and leases of $5.1 billion at December 31, 2021 decreased $184.9 million or 3.5% from December 31, 2020. The decrease was mainly in PPP loans, which totaled $71.3 million at year end 2021, and $291.3 million at year-end 2020. The decrease in PPP loans is due to the PPP loan forgiveness program and pay downs made in 2021. In total, the Company funded approximately $694.1 million in PPP loans, of which $620.2 million had been forgiven by the SBA under the terms of the program as of January 14, 2022. As of December 31, 2021, total loans and leases represented 64.9% of total assets compared to 69.0% of total assets at December 31, 2020.
Residential real estate loans, including home equity loans, were $1.5 billion at December 31, 2021, an increase of $37.6 million or 2.6% compared to the $1.4 billion reported at year-end 2020. Residential real estate loans comprised 29.0% of total loans and leases at December 31, 2021 compared to 27.3% at December 31, 2020. Growth in residential loan balances is impacted by the Company’s decision to retain these loans or sell them in the secondary market due to interest rate considerations. The Company’s Asset/Liability Committee meets regularly and establishes standards for selling and retaining residential real estate mortgage originations.
The Company may sell residential real estate loans in the secondary market based on interest rate considerations. These residential real estate loans are generally sold to FHLMC or State of New York Mortgage Agency (“SONYMA”) without recourse in accordance with standard secondary market loan sale agreements. These residential real estate loans also are subject to customary representations and warranties made by the Company, including representations and warranties related to gross incompetence and fraud. The Company has not had to repurchase any loans as a result of these representations and warranties.
During 2021, 2020, and 2019, the Company sold residential mortgage loans totaling $31.5 million, $51.7 million, and $16.9 million, respectively, and realized net gains on these sales of $943,000, $2.1 million, and $227,000, respectively. When residential mortgage loans are sold to FHLMC or SONYMA, the Company typically retains all servicing rights, which provides
43
Table of Contents
the Company with a source of fee income. In connection with the sales in 2021, 2020, and 2019, the Company recorded mortgage-servicing assets of $236,000, $388,000, and $127,000, respectively.
The Company originates fixed rate and adjustable rate residential mortgage loans, including loans that have characteristics of both, such as a 7/1 adjustable rate mortgage, which has a fixed rate for the first seven years and then adjusts annually thereafter. The majority of residential mortgage loans originated over the last several years have been fixed rate given the low interest rate environment. Adjustable rate residential real estate loans may be underwritten based upon an initial rate which is below the fully indexed rate; however, the initial rate is generally less than 100 basis points below the fully indexed rate. As such, the Company does not believe that this practice creates any significant credit risk.
Commercial real estate loans totaled $2.7 billion at December 31, 2021, an increase of $84.0 million or 3.3% compared to December 31, 2020, and represented 52.3% of total loans and leases at December 31, 2021, compared to 48.8% at December 31, 2020.
Commercial and industrial loans totaled $869.6 million at December 31, 2021, which is a decrease of $309.2 million or 26.2% from December 31, 2020. Commercial and industrial loans represented 17.1% of total loans at December 31, 2021 compared to 22.4% at December 31, 2020. The decrease at year-end 2021 from year-end 2020 was mainly due to PPP loans forgiven by the SBA. At December 31, 2021 the total outstanding balances of PPP loans was $71.3 million compared to $291.3 million at December 31, 2020.
As of December 31, 2021, agriculturally-related loans totaled $295.1 million or 5.8% of total loans and leases compared to $296.4 million or 5.6% of total loans and leases at December 31, 2020. Agriculturally-related loans include loans to dairy farms and cash and vegetable crop farms. Agriculturally related loans are primarily made based on identified cash flows of the borrower with consideration given to underlying collateral, personal guarantees, and government related guarantees. Agriculturally-related loans are generally secured by the assets or property being financed or other business assets such as accounts receivable, livestock, equipment or commodities/crops.
The consumer loan portfolio includes personal installment loans, indirect automobile financing, and overdraft lines of credit. Consumer and other loans were $72.1 million at December 31, 2021, compared to $69.8 million at December 31, 2020.
The lease portfolio decreased by 1.8% to $13.9 million at December 31, 2021 from $14.2 million at December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2021, commercial leases and municipal leases represented 100.0% of total leases.
The Company has adopted comprehensive lending policies, underwriting standards and loan review procedures. There were no significant changes to the Company’s existing policies, underwriting standards and loan review during 2021. The Company’s Board of Directors approves the lending policies at least annually. The Company recognizes that exceptions to policy guidelines may occasionally occur and has established procedures for approving exceptions to these policy guidelines. Management has also implemented reporting systems to monitor loan originations, loan quality, concentrations of credit, loan delinquencies and nonperforming loans and potential problem loans.
The Company’s loan and lease customers are located primarily in the New York and Pennsylvania communities served by its four subsidiary banks. Although operating in numerous communities in New York State and Pennsylvania, the Company is still dependent on the general economic conditions of these states. As a result, the economic consequences of the pandemic on our market area generally and on the Company in particular continue to be difficult to quantify. Other than geographic and general economic risks, management is not aware of any material concentrations of credit risk to any industry or individual borrower.
44
Table of Contents
Analysis of Past Due and Nonperforming Loans
As of December 31,
Loans 90 days past due and accruing1
Consumer and other $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 44
Total loans 90 days past due and accruing 0 0 0 0 44
Nonaccrual loans
1 The 2019, 2018 and 2017 columns in the above table exclude $794,000, $1.3 million, and $1.1 million, respectively, of acquired loans that are 90 days past due and accruing interest. These loans were originally recorded at fair value on the acquisition date of August 1, 2012. These loans are considered to be accruing as the Company can reasonably estimate future cash flows on these acquired loans and the Company expects to fully collect the carrying value of these loans. Therefore, the Company is accreting the difference between the carrying value of these loans and their expected cash flows into interest income.
The level of nonperforming assets as of the past five year-ends is illustrated in the table above. The Company’s total nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets was 0.40% at December 31, 2021, a decrease from 0.60% at December 31, 2020, and compares to its peer group's most recent ratio of 0.54% at September 30, 2021. The peer data is from the Federal Reserve Board and represents banks or bank holding companies with assets between $3.0 billion and $10.0 billion.
Nonperforming loans and leases totaled $31.2 million at December 31, 2021 and decreased 31.9% from December 31, 2020. Nonperforming loans and leases represented 0.61% of total loans at December 31, 2021, compared to 0.87% of total loans at December 31, 2020, and 0.64% of total loans at December 31, 2019. Nonperforming loans and leases in the commercial real estate portfolio at year-end 2021 decreased by $9.7 million compared to 2020; the decrease was mainly due to one credit totaling approximately $11.8 million in the hospitality industry that paid off in the fourth quarter of 2021.
The Company implemented a payment deferral program to assist both consumer and business borrowers that may be experiencing financial hardship due to COVID-19. As of December 31, 2021, total loans that continued in a deferral status amounted to approximately $4.5 million, representing 0.09% of total loans and $212.2 million at December 31, 2020.
Loans are considered modified in a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) when, due to a borrower’s financial difficulties, the Company makes a concession(s) to the borrower that the Company would not otherwise consider. When modifications are provided for reasons other than as a result of the financial distress of the borrower, these loans are not classified as TDRs or impaired. These modifications may include, among others, an extension of the term of the loan, and granting a period when interest-only payments can be made, with the principal payments made over the remaining term of the loan or at maturity. TDRs are included in the above table within the following categories: “loans 90 days past due and accruing”, “nonaccrual loans”, or “troubled debt restructurings not included above”. Loans in the latter category include loans that meet the definition of a TDR but are performing in accordance with the modified terms and have shown a satisfactory period of repayment (generally six consecutive months) and where full collection of all is reasonably assured. At December 31, 2021, the Company had $6.8 million in TDR balances, which are included in the above table, of which $5.1 million are included in the line captioned “Troubled debt restructurings not included above” and the remainder are included within nonaccrual loans.
45
Table of Contents
In general, the Company places a loan on nonaccrual status if principal or interest payments become 90 days or more past due and/or management deems the collectability of the principal and/or interest to be in question, as well as when called for by regulatory requirements. Although in nonaccrual status, the Company may continue to receive payments on these loans. These payments are generally recorded as a reduction to principal and interest income is recorded only after principal recovery is reasonably assured. For additional financial information on the difference between the interest income that would have been recorded if these loans and leases had been paid in accordance with their original terms and the interest income that was recorded, refer to “Note 3 – Loans and Leases” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report.
The Company’s recorded investment in loans and leases that are individually evaluated totaled $20.5 million at December 31, 2021, and $32.2 million at December 31, 2020. A loan is individually evaluated when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Individually evaluated loans consist of our non-homogenous nonaccrual loans and loans that are 90 days or more past due. Specific reserves on individually evaluated loans that are not collateral dependent are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the original effective interest rate of each loan. For loans that are collateral dependent, impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs, and such impaired amounts are generally charged off.
At December 31, 2021, there were specific reserves of $67,000, mainly related to one commercial real estate loan and one commercial loan compared to $308,000 of specific reserves on four commercial real estate loans and five commercial loans at December 31, 2020. The majority of the individually evaluated loans are collateral dependent loans that have limited exposure or require limited specific reserves because of the amount of collateral support with respect to these loans or the loans have been written down to fair value. Interest payments on individually evaluated loans are typically applied to principal unless collectability of the principal amount is reasonably assured. In these cases, interest is recognized on a cash basis. There was no interest income recognized on individually evaluated loans and leases for 2021, 2020 and 2019.
The ratio of the allowance to nonperforming loans (loans past due 90 days and accruing, nonaccrual loans and restructured troubled debt) was 137.5% at December 31, 2021, compared to 112.9% at December 31, 2020. The Company’s nonperforming loans are mostly made up of collateral dependent loans requiring little to no specific allowance due to the level of collateral available with respect to these loans and/or previous charge-offs.
Management reviews the loan portfolio for evidence of potential problem loans and leases. Potential problem loans and leases are loans and leases that are currently performing in accordance with contractual terms, but where known information about possible credit problems of the related borrowers causes management to have doubt as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the present loan payment terms and may result in such loans and leases becoming nonperforming at some time in the future. Management considers loans and leases classified as Substandard, which continue to accrue interest, to be potential problem loans and leases. The Company, through its credit administration function, identified 25 commercial relationships totaling $36.5 million at December 31, 2021 that were potential problem loans. At December 31, 2020, there were 35 relationships totaling $40.8 million in the loan portfolio that were considered potential problem loans. Of the 25 commercial relationships from the portfolio that were classified as potential problem loans at December 31, 2021, there were 9 relationships that equaled or exceeded $1.0 million, which in aggregate totaled $32.1 million. The potential problem loans remain in a performing status due to a variety of factors, including payment history, the value of collateral supporting the credits, and personal or government guarantees. These factors, when considered in the aggregate, give management reason to believe that the current risk exposure on these loans does not warrant accounting for these loans as nonperforming. However, these loans do exhibit certain risk factors, which have the potential to cause them to become nonperforming. Accordingly, management’s attention is focused on these credits, which are reviewed on at least a quarterly basis.
The Allowance for Credit Losses
Management reviews the appropriateness of the ACL on a regular basis. Management considers the accounting policy relating to the allowance to be a critical accounting policy, given the inherent uncertainty in evaluating the levels of the allowance required to cover credit losses in the portfolio and the material effect that assumptions could have on the Company’s results of operations. The Company has developed a methodology to measure the amount of estimated credit loss exposure inherent in the loan portfolio to assure that an appropriate allowance is maintained. The Company’s methodology is based upon guidance provided in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 119, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments ("CECL"), and Financial Instruments - Credit Losses and ASC Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses.
46
Table of Contents
The Company uses a discounted cash flow ("DCF") method to estimate expected credit losses for all loan segments excluding the leasing segment. For each of these loan segments, the Company generates cash flow projections at the instrument level wherein payment expectations are adjusted for estimated prepayment speeds, curtailments, recovery lag probability of default, and loss given default. The modeling of expected prepayment speeds, curtailment rates, and time to recovery are based on internal historical data.
The Company uses regression analysis of historical internal and peer data to determine suitable loss drivers to utilize when modeling lifetime probability of default and loss given default. This analysis also determines how expected probability of default and loss given default will react to forecasted levels of the loss drivers. For all loans utilizing the DCF method, management utilizes and forecasts national unemployment and a one year percentage change in national gross domestic product as loss drivers in the model.
For all DCF models, management has determined that four quarters represents a reasonable and supportable forecast period and reverts back to a historical loss rate over eight quarters on a straight-line basis. Management leverages economic projections from a reputable and independent third party to inform its loss driver forecasts over the four-quarter forecast period. Other internal and external indicators of economic forecasts, and scenario weightings, are also considered by management when developing the forecast metrics.
Due to the size and characteristics of the leasing portfolio, the Company uses the remaining life method, using the historical loss rate of the commercial and industrial segment, to determine the allowance for credit losses.
The combination of adjustments for credit expectations and timing expectations produces an expected cash flow stream at the instrument level. Instrument effective yield is calculated, net of the impacts of prepayment assumptions, and the instrument expected cash flows are then discounted at that effective yield to produce a net present value of expected cash flows ("NPV"). An ACL is established for the difference between the NPV and amortized cost basis.
The Company adopted Accounting Standard Update ("ASU") 2016-13 on January 1, 2020, using the prospective transition approach for financial assets purchased with credit deterioration ("PCD") that were previously classified as purchased credit impaired ("PCI") and accounted for under ASC 310-30. In accordance with the standard, the Company did not reassess whether PCI assets met the criteria of PCD assets as of the date of adoption. The remaining discount on the PCD assets will be accreted into interest income on a level-yield method over the life of the loans.
Since the methodology is based upon historical experience and trends, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts, as well as management’s judgment, factors may arise that result in different estimates. While management’s evaluation of the allowance as of December 31, 2021, considers the allowance to be appropriate, under adversely different conditions or assumptions, the Company would need to increase or decrease the allowance. In addition, various federal and State regulatory agencies, as part of their examination process, review the Company's allowance and may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance bases on their judgements and information available to them at the time of their examinations.
Loan Commitments and Allowance for Credit Losses on Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures
Financial instruments include off-balance sheet credit instruments, such as commitments to make loans, and commercial letters of credit. The Company's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for off-balance sheet loan commitments is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded. The Company records an allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures, unless the commitments to extend credit are unconditionally cancelable, through a charge to credit loss expense for off-balance sheet credit exposures included in other noninterest expense in the Company's consolidated statements of income. As of December 31, 2021, the Company's reserve for off-balance sheet credit exposures was $2.5 million, compared to $1.9 million at December 31, 2020. As a result of the adoption of ASC 326, the Company recorded a net cumulative-effect adjustment increasing the allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures by $381,000 from $477,000 at December 31, 2019, to $858,000 at January 1, 2020.
47
Table of Contents
The allocation of the Company’s allowance as of December 31, 2021, and each of the previous four years is illustrated in Table 5- Allocation of the Allowance for Credit Losses, below. The table represents the allowance for credit losses calculated under the new accounting guidance as of December 31, 2020, and the prior periods show amounts calculated under the incurred loss methodology calculation used prior to adoption. The table provides an allocation of the allowance for credit losses for inherent loan losses by type. The allocation is neither indicative of the specific amounts or the loan categories in which future charge-offs may occur, nor is it an indicator of future loss trends. The allocation of the allowance for credit losses to each category does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in any category.
Table 5 - Allocation of the Allowance for Credit Losses
As of December 31,
Allocation of the ACL by loan type:
Allocation of the ACL as a percentage of total allowance:
Consumer and other 3 % 3 % 3 % 3 % 3 %
Leases 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 %
Loan and lease types as a percentage of total loans and leases:
Consumer and other 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 %
Leases 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 % 0 %
As a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-13, the Company recorded a net cumulative-effect adjustment reducing the allowance for credit losses by $2.5 million from $39.9 million at December 31, 2019 to $37.4 million at January 1, 2020. Also in 2020 was a $14.9 million increase in provision expense driven by changes in economic conditions and forecasts related to the impact of COVID-19, including forecasts of significantly slower economic growth and higher unemployment. Improved forecasts for unemployment and economic growth contributed to the decrease in the allowance between year-end 2021 and year-end 2020.
As of December 31, 2021, the total allowance for credit losses was $42.8 million, a decrease of $8.8 million or 17.1% from year-end 2020. The decrease reflects net charge-offs of $6.0 million and a credit to provision expense of $2.8 million. The fourth quarter of 2021 included a $7.0 million charge-off of a commercial real estate relationship in the hospitality industry that was moved to nonaccrual in the second quarter of 2021. The lower allowance at December 31, 2021 compared to December 31, 2020 was mainly driven by improvement in forecasts for both unemployment and the gross domestic product used in our model at year-end 2021 compared to year-end 2020. Qualitative reserves are down from year-end 2020. Qualitative reserves for loans within the hospitality and certain other industries that may have an elevated level of risk due to the adverse economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and for loans that were part of the Company's payment deferral program implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic decreased over the course of the 2021 as pandemic restrictions eased and the economy started to reopen and loans exited the deferral program and returned to repayment status. Estimates of future delinquency and credit loss performance is extremely difficult given the uncertainties centering around the evolution of the virus, including the
48
Table of Contents
spread of the Delta variant, the efficacy of vaccination programs, the related pace of the full resumption of business activities, and the strength of the economic recovery as government assistance programs are phased out. The decrease in these qualitative reserves were partially offset by qualitative reserves for local (county) unemployment trends and changes in commercial real estate and residential real estate indices. The qualitative reserves were added to all portfolio segments, with the majority of the impact resulting in the commercial real estate portfolio, followed by residential real estate and commercial and industrial portfolios.
Total loans were $5.1 billion at December 31, 2021, a decrease of $184.9 million or 3.5% from December 31, 2020. The decrease from year-end 2021 was mainly due to the pay down of guaranteed PPP loans which were down $220.0 million compared to the same period prior year. Since the PPP loans are guaranteed by the SBA, there are no reserves allocated to these loans. Credit quality metrics at December 31, 2021, were improved when compared to year-end 2020. Nonperforming assets represented 0.40% of total assets at December 31, 2021, compared to 0.60% at December 31, 2020. Nonperforming loans and leases decreased $14.6 million or 31.9% from year end 2020 and represented 0.61% of total loans at December 31, 2021 compared to 0.87% at December 31, 2020. Loans internally-classified Special Mention or Substandard decreased $52.3 million or 27.6% compared to December 31, 2020. The improvement over December 31, 2020, were mainly due to improved economic conditions as pandemic-related restrictions are being lifted and businesses are reopening.
Table 6 - Analysis of the Allowance for Credit Losses
December 31,
Loans charged-off:
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off:
The above table shows the activity in the allowance for credit losses over the past five years. The allowance at December 31, 2021 was $42.8 million, a decrease of $8.8 million from year-end 2020, reflecting net charge-offs of $6.0 million and a credit to provision expense of $2.8 million. The year-over-year decrease is mainly due to one commercial real estate relationship that included included two loans and was charged off in the fourth quarter of 2021. For 2019, favorable trends in certain qualitative factors, lower historical loss rates in all loan portfolios except for commercial real estate at year-end 2019 compared to year-end
49
Table of Contents
2018, and lower specific reserves for impaired loans contributed to the lower allowance level at December 31, 2019 compared to December 31, 2018 and a decrease in provision expense in 2019 compared to 2018. As mentioned above, the $16.2 million provision expense in 2020 was driven by changes in economic conditions and forecasts related to the impact of COVID-19, including forecasts of significantly slower economic growth and higher unemployment. The majority of the increase in the allowance and provision expense in 2020 was in the first quarter of 2020. Provision expense decreased in 2021, as businesses opened and economic conditions continued to improve, resulting in the ability to reverse some of the provision expense booked in the first quarter of 2020 related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The ratio of the allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans was 0.84% at year-end 2021 compared to 0.98% at year-end 2020. The allowance coverage to nonperforming loans and leases was 137.50% at December 31, 2021 compared to 112.87% at December 31, 2020. Management believes that, based upon its evaluation as of December 31, 2021, the allowance is appropriate.
Deposits and Other Liabilities
Total deposits were $6.8 billion at December 31, 2021, an increase of $353.7 million or 5.5% compared to year-end 2020. The increase from year-end 2020 consisted of savings and money market balances, and noninterest bearing deposits up $254.1 million, and $206.1 million, respectively. This was partially offset by a reduction in time deposits, which decreased $106.6 million. Deposit balances have benefited from PPP loan originations and government stimulus payments related to COVID-19. The majority of the Company's PPP loan originations were deposited in Tompkins checking accounts.
The most significant source of funding for the Company is core deposits. The Company defines core deposits as total deposits less time deposits of $250,000 or more, brokered deposits, municipal money market deposits and reciprocal deposit relationships with municipalities. Core deposits increased by $626.4 million or 12.2% to $5.8 billion at year-end 2021 from $5.2 billion at year-end 2020. Core deposits represented 85.1% of total deposits at December 31, 2021, compared to 80.1% of total deposits at December 31, 2020.
Municipal money market accounts and reciprocal deposit relationships with municipalities totaled $802.1 million at year-end 2021, which increased 17.0% over year-end 2020. In general, there is a seasonal pattern to municipal deposits starting with a low point during July and August. Account balances tend to increase throughout the fall and into the winter months from tax deposits and receive an additional inflow at the end of March from the electronic deposit of state funds.
The Company uses both retail and wholesale repurchase agreements. Retail repurchase agreements are arrangements with local customers of the Company, in which the Company agrees to sell securities to the customer with an agreement to repurchase those securities at a specified later date. Retail repurchase agreements totaled $66.8 million at December 31, 2021, and $65.8 million at December 31, 2020. Management generally views local repurchase agreements as an alternative to large time deposits. Refer to “Note 8 Federal Funds Purchased and Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report for further details on the Company’s repurchase agreements.
The Company’s other borrowings totaled $124.0 million at year-end 2021, which was $141.0 million below prior year end. The decrease in borrowings was due to deposit growth from year-end 2020. In the third quarter of 2021, the Company prepaid $135.0 million of FHLB fixed rate advances and incurred prepayment penalties of $2.9 million, recorded in noninterest expense. The advances, which were paid off in September 2021, carried a weighted average rate of 2.26% and had a weighted average maturity of 1.25 years. The $124.0 million in borrowings at December 31, 2021, represented $14.0 million in overnight advances from the FHLB and $110.0 million in term advances from the FHLB. Borrowings of $265.0 million at year-end 2020 represented FHLB term advances. Of the $110.0 million in FHLB term advances at year-end 2021, $100.0 million are due in over one year. Refer to “Note 9 - Other Borrowings” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report for further details on the Company’s term borrowings with the FHLB.
Liquidity Management
As of December 31, 2021, the Company had not experienced any significant impact to our liquidity or funding capabilities as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Company has a long-standing liquidity plan in place that is designed to ensure that appropriate liquidity resources are available to fund the balance sheet. Additionally, given the uncertainties related to the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on liquidity, the Company has confirmed the availability of funds at the FHLB of NY, completed actions required to activate participation in the Federal Reserve Bank PPP lending facility, and confirmed availability of Federal Fund lines with correspondent bank partners.
50
Table of Contents
The objective of liquidity management is to ensure the availability of adequate funding sources to satisfy the demand for credit, deposit withdrawals, operating expenses, and business investment opportunities. The Company’s large, stable core deposit base and strong capital position are the foundation for the Company’s liquidity position. The Company uses a variety of resources to meet its liquidity needs, which include deposits, cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, cash flow from lending and investing activities, repurchase agreements, and borrowings. The Company may also use borrowings as part of a growth strategy. Asset and liability positions are monitored primarily through the Asset/Liability Management Committee of the Company’s subsidiary banks. This Committee reviews periodic reports on the liquidity and interest rate sensitivity positions. Comparisons with industry and peer groups are also monitored. The Company’s strong reputation in the communities it serves, along with its strong financial condition, provides access to numerous sources of liquidity as described below. Management believes these diverse liquidity sources provide sufficient means to meet all demands on the Company’s liquidity that are reasonably likely to occur.
Core deposits, discussed above under “Deposits and Other Liabilities”, are a primary and low cost funding source obtained primarily through the Company’s branch network. In addition to core deposits, the Company uses non-core funding sources to support asset growth. These non-core funding sources include time deposits of $250,000 or more, brokered time deposits, municipal money market deposits, reciprocal deposits, bank borrowings, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, overnight borrowings and term advances from the FHLB and other funding sources. Rates and terms are the primary determinants of the mix of these funding sources.
Non-core funding sources totaled $1.2 billion at December 31, 2021, a decrease of $412.8 million or 25.6% from $1.6 billion at December 31, 2020. The decrease was driven mainly by the repayment of $200.0 million of brokered time deposits that matured during the second quarter of 2021 and the prepayment of $135.0 million of FHLB term borrowings during the third quarter of 2021. Non-core funding sources decreased year-over-year as the Company experienced sufficient growth in core deposits to fund earning asset growth. Non-core funding sources as a percentage of total liabilities decreased from 23.4% at year-end 2020 to 17.0% at year-end 2021.
Non-core funding sources may require securities to be pledged against the underlying liability. Securities carried at $1.4 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020, were either pledged or sold under agreements to repurchase. Pledged securities or securities sold under agreements to repurchase represented 59.4% of total securities at December 31, 2021, compared to 75.3% of total securities at December 31, 2020.
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $63.1 million as of December 31, 2021, a decrease from $388.5 million at December 31, 2020. Short-term investments, consisting of securities due in one year or less, increased from $55.0 million at December 31, 2020, to $77.9 million at December 31, 2021.
Cash flow from the loan and investment portfolios provides a significant source of liquidity. These assets may have stated maturities in excess of one year, but they have monthly principal reductions. Total mortgage-backed securities, at fair value, were $947.7 million at December 31, 2021 compared with $887.6 million at December 31, 2020. Outstanding principal balances of residential mortgage loans, consumer loans, and leases totaled approximately $1.6 billion at December 31, 2021 compared to $1.5 billion at December 31, 2020. Aggregate amortization from monthly payments on these assets provides significant additional cash flow to the Company.
Liquidity is enhanced by ready access to national and regional wholesale funding sources including Federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements, brokered certificates of deposit, and FHLB advances. Through its subsidiary banks, the Company has borrowing relationships with the FHLB and correspondent banks, which provide secured and unsecured borrowing capacity. At December 31, 2021, the unused borrowing capacity on established lines with the FHLB was $2.3 billion.
As members of the FHLB, the Company’s subsidiary banks can use certain unencumbered mortgage-related assets and securities to secure additional borrowings from the FHLB. At December 31, 2021, total unencumbered mortgage loans and securities of the Company were $1.6 billion. Additional assets may also qualify as collateral for FHLB advances upon approval of the FHLB.
The Company has not identified any trends or circumstances that are reasonably likely to result in material increases or decreases in liquidity in the near term.
51
Table of Contents
Table 7 - Loan Maturity
Remaining maturity of loans December 31, 2021
Of the loan amounts shown above in Table 7 - Loan Maturity, maturing over 1 year, $2.1 billion have fixed rates and $2.6 billion have adjustable rates.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of business, the Company is party to certain financial instruments, which in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, are not included in its Consolidated Statements of Condition. These transactions include commitments under standby letters of credit, unused portions of lines of credit, and commitments to fund new loans and are undertaken to accommodate the financing needs of the Company’s customers. Loan commitments are agreements by the Company to lend monies at a future date. These loan and letter of credit commitments are subject to the same credit policies and reviews as the Company’s loans. Because most of these loan commitments expire within one year from the date of issue, the total amount of these loan commitments as of December 31, 2021, are not necessarily indicative of future cash requirements. Further information on these commitments and contingent liabilities is provided in “Note 17 Commitments and Contingent Liabilities” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report.
Contractual Obligations
The Company leases land, buildings, and equipment under operating lease arrangements extending to the year 2090. Most leases include options to renew for periods ranging from 5 to 20 years. In addition, the Company has a software contract for its core banking application through June 30, 2024 along with contracts for more specialized software programs through 2021. Further information on the Company’s lease arrangements is provided in “Note 6 Premises and Equipment” in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. of this Report. The Company’s contractual obligations as of December 31, 2021, are shown in Table 8-Contractual Obligations and Commitments below.
Table 8 - Contractual Obligations and Commitments
Contractual cash obligations At December 31, 2021Payments due within
(In thousands) Total 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years After 5 years
1 Operating leases include renewals the Company considers reasonably certain to exercise.
52
Table of Contents
Non-GAAP Disclosure
The following table summarizes the Company’s results of operations on a GAAP basis and on an operating (non-GAAP) basis for the periods indicated. The non-GAAP financial measures adjust GAAP measures to exclude the effects of non-operating items, such as acquisition related intangible amortization expense, and significant nonrecurring income or expense on earnings, equity, and capital. The Company believes the non-GAAP measures provide meaningful comparisons of our underlying operational performance and facilitate management's and investors' assessments of business and performance trends in comparison to others in the financial services industry. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation or as a measure of the Company's profitability or liquidity; they are in addition to, and are not a substitute for, financial measures under GAAP. The non-GAAP financial measures presented herein may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies, and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. In the future, the Company may utilize other measures to illustrate performance. Non-GAAP financial measures have limitations since they do not reflect all of the amounts associated with the Company's results of operations as determined in accordance with GAAP.
53
Table of Contents
For the year ended December 31,
Adjustments for non-operating income and expense:
Penalties on prepayment of FHLB borrowings 2,929 0 0 0 0
Gain on sale of real estate 0 0 0 (2,950) 0
Write-down of impaired leases 0 0 0 2,536 0
Remeasurement of deferred taxes 0 0 0 0 14,944
Write-down of real estate pending sale 0 673 0 0 0
Newly Adopted Accounting Standards
ASU No 2019-12, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes.” ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 in Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. ASU 2019-12 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2021, and did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
54
Table of Contents
Accounting Standards Pending Adoption
ASU No. 2021-08, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers. This ASU update improves the accounting for acquired revenue contracts with customers in a business combination by addressing diversity in practice and inconsistency related to recognition of an acquired contract liability and payment terms and their effect on subsequent revenue recognized by the acquirer. OR This ASU update require that an entity (acquirer) recognize and measure contract assets and contract liabilities acquired in a business combination in accordance with Topic 606. At the acquisition date, an acquirer should account for the related revenue contracts in accordance with Topic 606. The update is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022,including interim periods within those fiscal years.
ASU No. 2021-10, Government Assistance (Topic 832): Disclosures by Business Entities about Government Assistance. This ASU requires business entities to make annual disclosures about transactions with a government they account for by analogizing to a grant or contribution accounting model under ASC 958-605. We have evaluated the effect that this guidance will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements and determined it will not have a material impact.
The Company reviewed new accounting standards as issued. Management has not identified any other new standards that it believes will have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market Risk
Interest rate risk is the primary market risk category associated with the Company’s operations. Interest rate risk refers to the volatility of earnings caused by changes in interest rates. The Company manages interest rate risk using income simulation to measure interest rate risk inherent in its on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet financial instruments at a given point in time. The simulation models are used to estimate the potential effect of interest rate shifts on net interest income for future periods. Each quarter the Company’s Asset/Liability Management Committee reviews the simulation results to determine whether the exposure of net interest income to changes in interest rates remains within Board-approved levels. The Committee also considers strategies to manage this exposure and incorporates these strategies into the investment and funding decisions of the Company. The Company does not currently use derivatives, such as interest rate swaps, to manage its interest rate risk exposure, but may consider such instruments in the future.
The Company’s Board of Directors has set a policy that interest rate risk exposure will remain within a range whereby net interest income will not decline by more than 10% in one year as a result of a 100 basis point parallel change in rates. Based upon the simulation analysis performed as of November 30, 2021, a 200 basis point parallel upward change in interest rates over a one-year time frame would result in a one-year decrease in net interest income of approximately 3.5% from the base case, while a 100 basis point parallel decline in interest rates over a one-year period would result in a one-year decrease in net interest income of approximately 1.9% from the base case. The simulation assumes no balance sheet growth and no management action to address balance sheet mismatches.
The decrease in net interest income in the rising rate scenario is a result of the balance sheet showing a more liability sensitive position over a one year time horizon. As such, in the short-term net interest income is expected to trend slightly below the base assumption, as upward adjustments to rate sensitive deposits and short-term funding outpace increases to asset yields which are concentrated in intermediate to longer-term products. As intermediate and longer-term assets continue to reprice/adjust into higher rate environment and funding costs stabilize, net interest income is expected to trend upwards.
The down 100 basis point scenario decreases net income slightly in the first year as a result of the Company's assets repricing downward to a greater degree than the rates on the Company's interest-bearing liabilities, mainly deposits and overnight borrowings. Rates on savings and money market accounts have moved down and are at or near historically low levels, allowing for minimal interest expense relief in the first year of a declining rate scenario. In addition, the model assumes that prepayments accelerate in the lower interest rate environment resulting in additional pressure on asset yields as proceeds are reinvested at lower rates.
The most recent simulation of a base case scenario, which assumes interest rates remain unchanged from the date of the simulation, reflects a net interest margin that is declining slightly over the next 12 to 18 months.
55
Table of Contents
Although the simulation model is useful in identifying potential exposure to interest rate movements, actual results may differ from those modeled as the repricing, maturity, and prepayment characteristics of financial instruments may change to a different degree than modeled. In addition, the model does not reflect actions that management may employ to manage its interest rate risk exposure. The Company’s current liquidity profile, capital position, and growth prospects, offer a level of flexibility for management to take actions that could offset some of the negative effects of unfavorable movements in interest rates. Management believes the current exposure to changes in interest rates is not significant in relation to the earnings and capital strength of the Company.
In addition to the simulation analysis, management uses an interest rate gap measure. Table 9-Interest Rate Risk Analysis below is a Condensed Static Gap Report, which illustrates the anticipated repricing intervals of assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2021. The Company’s one-year interest rate gap was a negative $331.5 million or 4.24% of total assets at December 31, 2021, compared with a positive $58.9 million or 0.77% of total assets at December 31, 2020. The change from year-end 2020 to year-end 2021 is mainly due to deposit growth and PPP loan paydowns, which resulted in a decrease in borrowings with the FHLB. A negative gap position exists when the amount of interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing exceeds the amount of interest-earning assets maturing or repricing within a particular time period. This analysis suggests that the Company’s net interest income is moderately at risk in an increasing rate environment over the next 12 months. An interest rate gap measure could be significantly affected by external factors such as a rise or decline in interest rates, loan or securities prepayments, and deposit withdrawals.
Table 9 - Interest Rate Risk Analysis
Condensed Static Gap - December 31, 2021
(In thousands) Total 0-3 months 3-6 months 6-12 months 12 months
1Balances of available-for-sale debt securities are shown at amortized cost.
56
Table of Contents
[This Page Intentionally Left Blank]
57
Table of Contents
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data consist of the consolidated financial statements and the unaudited quarterly financial data as indexed and presented below.
Index to Financial Statements Page
Management’s Statement of Responsibility 59
Consolidated Statements of Condition – December 31, 2021 and 2020 64
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 71
Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data 129
58
Table of Contents
Management’s Statement of Responsibility
Management is responsible for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and related financial information contained in all sections of this annual report, including the determination of amounts that must necessarily be based on judgments and estimates. It is the belief of management that the consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Management establishes and monitors the Company’s system of internal accounting controls to meet its responsibility for reliable financial statements. The system is designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded, and that transactions are executed in accordance with management’s authorization and are properly recorded.
The Audit/Examining Committee of the board of directors, composed solely of outside directors, meets periodically and privately with management, internal auditors, and the independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, to review matters relating to the quality of financial reporting, internal accounting control, and the nature, extent, and results of audit efforts. The independent registered public accounting firm and internal auditors have unlimited access to the Audit/Examining Committee to discuss all such matters. The consolidated financial statements have been audited by KPMG LLP for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the consolidated financial statements. In addition, KPMG LLP has audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting, as of December 31, 2021.
/s/ Stephen S. Romaine /s/ Francis M. Fetsko Date: March 1, 2022
Stephen S. Romaine Francis M. Fetsko
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
Chief Operating Officer
59
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Tompkins Financial Corporation:
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Tompkins Financial Corporation and subsidiaries' (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated statements of condition of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows, and changes in shareholders’ equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated March 1, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Rochester, New York
60
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Tompkins Financial Corporation:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of condition of Tompkins Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows, and changes in shareholders’ equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated March 1, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for the recognition and measurement of credit losses as of January 1, 2020 due to the adoption of ASU 2016-13 Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, and its related amendments.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Allowance for Credit Losses – Loans evaluated on a Collective Basis
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (ASC Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, and its related amendments as of January 1, 2020. As discussed in Notes 1 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s allowance for credit losses on loans evaluated on a collective basis (the collective ACL on loans) was
61
Table of Contents
$42.7 million out of a total allowance for credit losses on loans of $42.8 million as of December 31, 2021. The collective ACL on loans includes the measure of expected credit losses on a collective (pooled) basis for those loans that share similar risk characteristics. The methodologies apply historical loss information, adjusted for asset-specific characteristics, economic conditions at the measurement date, and forecasts about future economic conditions expected to exist through the contractual lives of the financial assets that are reasonable and supportable. The Company uses a discounted cash flow methodology (DCF methodology) where the respective cash flows for each segment are developed using the assumptions of probability of default (PD), loss given default (LGD), estimated prepayment speeds, and exposure at default. The DCF methodology is calculated at the loan level and aggregated at the segment level, and expected credit losses are estimated over the effective life of the loans by measuring the difference between the net present value of modeled cash flows and the amortized cost basis. The Company uses models to develop the PD and LGD, which are derived from internal and selected peer groups’ historical default and loss experience, that incorporate probability weighted economic scenarios and macroeconomic assumptions over a reasonable and supportable forecast period. In order to capture the unique risks of the loan segments within the PD and LGD models, the Company measures expected credit losses at the loan level by segment, by pooling loans when the financial assets share similar risk characteristics. After the reasonable and supportable forecast period, the Company reverts back to a historical loss rate over eight quarters on a straight-line basis. A portion of the collective ACL on loans is comprised of adjustments to historical loss information. These adjustments are based on qualitative factors not reflected in the quantitative model but are likely to impact the measurement of estimated credit losses.
We identified the assessment of the collective ACL on loans as a critical audit matter. A high degree of audit effort, including specialized skills and knowledge, and subjective and complex auditor judgment was involved in the assessment of the collective ACL on loans due to significant measurement uncertainty. Specifically, the assessment encompassed the evaluation of the collective ACL on loans methodology, including the methods and models used to estimate the PD, LGD and their significant assumptions, including portfolio segmentation, estimated prepayment speeds, the economic forecast scenarios and scenario weightings, macroeconomic assumptions, the reasonable and supportable forecast period, the composition of the peer group data, and the historical observation period. The assessment also included the evaluation of the qualitative factors and their significant assumptions, including the effects of limitations inherent in the quantitative model and an evaluation of the conceptual soundness and performance of the PD and LGD models. In addition, auditor judgment was required to evaluate the sufficiency of audit evidence obtained.
The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to the measurement of the collective ACL on loans, including controls over the:
–development of the collective ACL on loans methodology
–continued use and appropriateness of changes made to PD and LGD models
–performance monitoring of the PD and LGD models
–Identification and determination and measurement of the significant assumptions used in the PD and LGD models, including prepayment assumptions
–development of the qualitative factors including the significant assumptions used in the measurement of the qualitative factors; and
–analysis of the collective ACL on loans results, trends, and ratios.
We evaluated the Company’s process to develop the collective ACL on loans estimate by testing certain sources of data, factors, and assumptions that the Company used, and considered the relevance and reliability of such data, factors, and assumptions. In addition, we involved credit risk professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:
–evaluating the Company’s collective ACL on loans methodology for compliance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
–evaluating judgments made by the Company relative to the development and performance testing of the PD and LGD models, and other significant assumptions such as prepayment speeds by comparing them to relevant Company-specific metrics and trends and the applicable industry and regulatory practices
–assessing the conceptual soundness and performance testing of the PD and LGD models, by inspecting the model documentation to determine whether the models are suitable for their intended use
–evaluating the economic forecast scenarios and weightings, by comparing them to the Company's business environment and relevant industry practices
62
Table of Contents
–evaluating the length of the historical observation and reasonable and supportable forecast period by comparing them to specific portfolio risk characteristics and trends
–assessing the composition of the peer group by comparing to specific portfolio characteristics and
–evaluating the methodology used to develop the qualitative factors and the effect of those factors on the collective ACL on loans compared with relevant credit risk factors and consistency with credit trends and identified limitations of the underlying quantitative model.
We also assessed the sufficiency of the audit evidence obtained related to the collective ACL on loans by evaluating the:
–cumulative results of the audit procedures
–qualitative aspects of the Company’s accounting practices
–potential bias in the accounting estimate.
/s/ KPMG LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 1995.
Rochester, New York
63
Table of Contents
TOMPKINS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
(In thousands, except share and per share data) As of As of
Cash and noninterest bearing balances due from banks $ 23,078 $ 21,245
Federal Home Loan Bank and other stock 10,996 16,382
LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Interest bearing:
Trust preferred debentures 0 13,220
EQUITY
Tompkins Financial Corporation shareholders' equity:
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (55,950) (32,074)
Total Tompkins Financial Corporation Shareholders’ Equity 727,529 716,277
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
64
Table of Contents
TOMPKINS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Year ended December 31,
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME
Federal Home Loan Bank stock and Federal Reserve Bank stock 776 1,373 3,003
INTEREST EXPENSE
Less: (Credit) provision for Credit Loss Expense (2,219) 17,213 1,366
NONINTEREST INCOME
Net gain on securities transactions 249 443 645
NONINTEREST EXPENSES
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 127 154 127
Diluted Earnings Per Share $ 6.05 $ 5.20 $ 5.37
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
65
Table of Contents
TOMPKINS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Year ended December 31,
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Available-for-sale debt securities:
Change in net unrealized gain (loss) during the period (34,961) 16,894 25,241
Unrealized gains on HTM securities transferred to AFS securities 0 0 2,852
Employee benefit plans:
Net actuarial gain due to curtailment 0 0 (302)
Net retirement plan prior service (credit) cost 0 0 (1,373)
Amortization of net retirement plan actuarial gain 2,228 1,786 1,266
Amortization of net retirement plan prior service cost 167 162 24
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
66
Table of Contents
TOMPKINS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year ended December 31,
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Accretion related to purchase accounting (912) (1,066) (1,448)
Earnings from corporate owned life insurance, net (1,879) (2,188) (2,164)
Net (gain) loss on sale of securities transactions (249) (443) (645)
Loss on redemption of trust preferred debentures 1,845 139 0
Penalties on prepayment of FHLB borrowings 2,929 0 0
Net gain on sale of bank premises and equipment (21) (3) (98)
Net excess tax benefit from stock based compensation 609 118 944
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable 9,428 (12,732) 1,629
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable (826) (759) 78
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities (283,992) 0 (7,589)
Purchases of Federal Home Loan Bank and other stock (3,796) (25,393) (108,188)
Proceeds from sale of bank premises and equipment 95 22 448
Purchases of bank premises, equipment and software (4,741) (4,551) (6,014)
Redemption of corporate owned life insurance 169 446 1,370
Net cash used in acquisitions 0 0 (436)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Redemption of trust preferred debentures (15,150) (4,124) 0
Net shares issued related to restricted stock awards (2,292) (1,682) (1,875)
Shares issued for dividend reinvestment plan 2 1,825 0
Net proceeds from exercise of stock options (803) (253) (992)
67
Table of Contents
TOMPKINS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Year ended December 31,
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned 46 192 803
Transfer of securities from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale 0 0 138,206
Initial recognition of operating lease right-of-use assets 0 0 35,783
Initial recognition of operating lease liabilities 0 0 38,119
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
68
Table of Contents
TOMPKINS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Total Comprehensive Income 101,446
Stock-based compensation expense 4,235 4,235
Directors deferred compensation plan (1,729 shares) 377 (377) 0
Dividend to noncontrolling interests (127) (127)
Total Comprehensive Income 89,232
Net exercise of stock options (3,775 shares) 1 (254) (253)
Stock-based compensation expense 4,733 4,733
Shares issued for dividend reinvestment plan (29,842 shares) 3 1,822 1,825
Directors deferred compensation plan (893 shares) 255 (255) 0
Partial repurchase of noncontrolling interest (6) (6)
Dividend to noncontrolling interests (148) (148)
69
Table of Contents
TOMPKINS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)
Total Comprehensive Income 65,515
Stock-based compensation expense 5,145 5,145
Shares issued for dividend reinvestment plan (32 shares) 2 2
Directors deferred compensation plan (140 shares) 257 (257) 0
Partial repurchase of noncontrolling interest (2) (2)
Dividend to noncontrolling interests (125) (125)
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
70
Table of Contents
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis Of Presentation
Tompkins Financial Corporation (“Tompkins” or “the Company”) is a registered Financial Holding Company with the Federal Reserve Board pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, organized under the laws of New York State, and is the parent company of Tompkins Community Bank, and Tompkins Insurance Agencies, Inc. (“Tompkins Insurance”). Tompkins Community Bank provides a full array of trust and investment services under the Tompkins Financial Advisors brand. Unless the context otherwise requires, the term “Company” refers to Tompkins Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries.
The consolidated financial information included herein combines the results of operations, the assets, liabilities, and shareholders’ equity (including comprehensive income or loss) of the Company and all entities in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
The Company determines whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity by first evaluating whether the entity is a voting interest entity or a variable interest entity under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Voting interest entities are entities in which the total equity investment at risk is sufficient to enable the entity to finance itself independently and provides the equity holders with the obligation to absorb losses, the right to receive residual returns and the right to make decisions about the entity’s activities. The Company consolidates voting interest entities in which it has all, or at least a majority of, the voting interest. As defined in applicable accounting standards, variable interest entities (VIEs) are entities that lack one or more of the characteristics of a voting interest entity. A controlling financial interest in a VIE is present when the Company has both the power and ability to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclose contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the allowance for credit losses, valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, deferred income tax assets, and obligations related to employee benefits.
The consolidated financial information included herein combines the results of operations, the assets, liabilities, and shareholders’ equity of the Company and its subsidiaries. Amounts in the prior periods’ unaudited consolidated financial statements are reclassified when necessary to conform to the current periods’ presentation.
The Company has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and/or disclosure and determined that no further disclosures were required.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows include cash and noninterest bearing balances due from banks, interest-bearing balances due from banks, Federal funds sold, and money market funds. Management regularly evaluates the credit risk associated with the counterparties to these transactions and believes that the Company is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents. Historically, each bank subsidiary is required to maintain reserve balances by the Federal Reserve Bank. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Federal Reserve Board reduced reserve requirement ratios to zero percent effective March 26, 2020. The Federal Reserve Board has stated that it has no plans to re-impose reserve requirements, but that it may adjust reserve requirements ratios in the future if conditions warrant. At both December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the reserve requirements for the Company’s banking subsidiaries totaled $0.0.
Securities
Management determines the appropriate classification of debt securities at the time of purchase. Securities are classified as held-to-maturity when the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Held-to-maturity securities are stated at amortized cost. Debt securities not classified as held-to-maturity securities are classified as either available-for-sale or trading. Available-for-sale debt securities are stated at fair value with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of accumulated comprehensive income or loss, in shareholders’ equity. Trading securities are stated at fair value, with unrealized gains or losses included in earnings.
71
Table of Contents
Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted over the expected life or call date of the related security as an adjustment to yield using the interest method. Dividend and interest income are recognized when earned. Realized gains and losses on the sale of securities are included in net gain (loss) on securities transactions. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.
Beginning January 1, 2020, for available-for-sale debt securities in an unrealized loss position, at least quarterly, the Company evaluates the securities to determine whether the decline in the fair value below the amortized cost basis (impairment) is due to credit-related factors or noncredit-related factors. Any impairment that is not credit-related is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. Credit-related impairment is recognized as an allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) on the Statements of Condition, limited to the amount by which the amortized cost basis exceeds the fair value, with a corresponding adjustment to earnings. Both the ACL and the adjustment to net income may be reversed if conditions change. However, if the Company intends to sell an impaired available-for-sale debt security or more likely than not will be required to sell such a security before recovering its amortized cost basis, the entire impairment amount must be recognized in earnings with a corresponding adjustment to the security’s amortized cost basis. Because the security’s amortized cost basis is adjusted to fair value, there is no ACL in this situation. Changes in the allowance for credit losses are recorded as provision (credit) for credit loss expense. Losses are charged against the ACL when management believes the uncollectability of an available-for-sale debt security is confirmed or when either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met.
Management measures expected credit losses on held-to-maturity debt securities on a collective basis by major security type with each type sharing similar risk characteristics and considers historical credit loss information that is adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. As of December 31, 2021, the held-to-maturity portfolio consisted of U.S. Treasury securities and securities issued by U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, including the Federal National Mortgage Agency and the Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation. U.S. Treasury securities are backed by the full faith and credit of and/or guaranteed by the U.S. government, and it is expected that the securities will not be settled at prices less than the amortized cost basis of the securities. Securities issued by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises carry the explicit and/or implicit guarantee of the U.S. government, are widely recognized as "risk-free," and have a long history of zero credit loss.
Prior to January 1, 2020, we regularly evaluated our debt securities to determine whether there have been any events or economic circumstances indicating that a security with an unrealized loss has suffered other-than-temporary impairment. A debt security is considered impaired if the fair value is less than its amortized cost basis at the reporting date. If impaired, the Company then assesses whether the unrealized loss is other-than-temporary. An unrealized loss on a debt security is generally deemed to be other-than-temporary and a credit loss is deemed to exist if the present value, discounted at the security’s effective rate, of the expected future cash flows is less than the amortized cost basis of the debt security. As a result, the credit loss component of an other-than-temporary impairment write-down for debt securities is recorded in earnings while the remaining portion of the impairment loss is recognized, net of tax, in other comprehensive income provided that the Company does not intend to sell the underlying debt security and it is more-likely-than not that the Company would not have to sell the debt security prior to recovery of the unrealized loss, which may be to maturity. If the Company intended to sell any securities with an unrealized loss or it is more-likely-than not that the Company would be required to sell the investment securities, before recovery of their amortized cost basis, then the entire unrealized loss would be recorded in earnings.
Accrued interest receivable on securities is excluded from the estimate of credit losses.
Loans and Leases
Loans are reported at their principal outstanding balance, net of deferred loan origination fees and costs, and unearned income. The Company has the ability and intent to hold its loans for the foreseeable future, except for certain residential real estate loans held-for-sale. The Company provides motor vehicle and equipment financing to its customers through direct financing leases. These leases are carried at the aggregate of lease payments receivable, plus estimated residual values, less unearned income. Unearned income on direct financing leases is amortized over the lease terms, resulting in a level rate of return.
72
Table of Contents
Residential real estate loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or estimated fair value. Fair value is determined on the basis of the rates quoted in the secondary market. Net unrealized losses attributable to changes in market interest rates are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges to income. Loans are generally sold on a non-recourse basis with servicing retained. Any gain or loss on the sale of loans is recognized at the time of sale as the difference between the recorded basis in the loan and the net proceeds from the sale. The Company may use commitments at the time loans are originated or identified for sale to mitigate interest rate risk. The commitments to sell loans and the commitments to originate loans held-for-sale at a set interest rate, if originated, are considered derivatives under Account Standard Codification ("ASC") Topic 815 Derivatives and Hedging. The impact of the estimated fair value adjustment was not significant to the consolidated financial statements.
Interest income on loans is accrued and credited to income based upon the principal amount outstanding. Loan origination fees and costs are deferred and recognized over the life of the loan as an adjustment to yield. Loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments are due. Loans and leases, including impaired loans, are generally classified as nonaccrual if they are past due as to maturity or payment of principal or interest for a period of more than 90 days, unless such loans are well secured and in the process of collection. Loans that are past due less than 90 days may also be classified as nonaccrual if repayment in full of principal or interest is in doubt.
Loans may be returned to accrual status when all principal and interest amounts contractually due (including arrearages) are reasonably assured of repayment within an acceptable time period, and there is a sustained period (generally six consecutive months) of repayment performance by the borrower in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Payments received on loans on nonaccrual are generally applied to reduce the principal balance of the loan.
In general, the principal balance of a loan is charged off in full or in part when management concludes, based on the available facts and circumstances, that collection of principal in full is not probable. For commercial and commercial real estate loans, this conclusion is generally based upon a review of the borrower’s financial condition and cash flow, payment history, economic conditions, and the conditions in the various markets in which the collateral, if any, may be liquidated. In general, consumer loans are charged-off in accordance with regulatory guidelines which provides that such loans be charged-off when the Company becomes aware of the loss, such as from a triggering event that may include new information about a borrower’s intent/ability to repay the loan, bankruptcy, fraud or death, among other things, but in no case will the charge-off exceed specified delinquency timeframes. Such delinquency timeframes state that closed-end retail loans (loans with pre-defined maturity dates, such as real estate mortgages, home equity loans and consumer installment loans) that become past due 120 cumulative days and open-end retail loans (loans that roll-over at the end of each term, such as home equity lines of credit) that become past due 180 cumulative days should be classified as a loss and charged-off. For residential real estate loans, charge-off decisions are based upon past due status, current assessment of collateral value, and general market conditions in the areas where the properties are located.
Acquired Loans
Acquired loans are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition based on a discounted cash flow methodology that considers various factors including the type of loan and related collateral, classification status, fixed or variable interest rate, term of loan and whether or not the loan was amortizing, and a discount rate reflecting the Company’s assessment of risk inherent in the cash flow estimates. Certain larger purchased loans are individually evaluated while other purchased loans are grouped together according to similar risk characteristics and are treated in the aggregate when applying various valuation techniques. These cash flow evaluations are inherently subjective as they require material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change.
Prior to January 1, 2020, loans acquired in a business combination that had evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination and for which it was probable, at acquisition, that the Company would be unable to collect all contractually required payments receivable were considered purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) loans. PCI loans were individually evaluated and recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition with no initial valuation allowance based on a discounted cash flow methodology that considered various factors including the type of loan and related collateral, classification status, fixed or variable interest rate, term of loan and whether or not the loan was amortizing, and a discount rate reflecting the Company’s assessment of risk inherent in the cash flow estimates. The difference between the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition and the investment in the loan, or the “accretable yield,” was recognized as interest income on a level-yield method over the life of the loan. Contractually required payments for interest and principal that exceeded the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition, or the “non-accretable difference,” were not recognized on the Statement of Condition and did not result in any yield adjustments, loss accruals or valuation allowances. Increases in expected cash flows, including prepayments, subsequent to the initial investment were recognized prospectively through adjustment of the yield on the loan over its
73
Table of Contents
remaining life. Decreases in expected cash flows were recognized as impairment. Valuation allowances on PCI loans reflected only losses incurred after the acquisition (meaning the present value of all cash flows expected at acquisition that ultimately were not to be received).
Commencing January 1, 2020, in connection with the Company's adoption of ASU 2016-13 Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, and its related amendments, loans acquired in a business combination that have experienced more-than-insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination are considered purchased credit deteriorated (“PCD”) loans. At the acquisition date, an estimate of expected credit losses is made for groups of PCD loans with similar risk characteristics and individual PCD loans without similar risk characteristics. This initial allowance for credit losses is allocated to individual PCD loans and added to the purchase price or acquisition date fair values to establish the initial amortized cost basis of the PCD loans. As the initial allowance for credit losses is added to the purchase price, there is no credit loss expense recognized upon acquisition of a PCD loan. Any difference between the unpaid principal balance of PCD loans and the amortized cost basis is considered to relate to noncredit factors and results in a discount or premium. Discounts and premiums are recognized through interest income on a level-yield method over the life of the loans. All loans considered to be PCI prior to January 1, 2020 were converted to PCD on that date.
The subsequent measurement of expected credit losses for all acquired loans is the same as the subsequent measurement of expected credit losses for originated loans.
Allowance for Credit Losses – Loans
The Company adopted ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2020 using the modified retrospective approach. The Company recorded a net increase to retained earnings of $1.7 million, upon adoption. The transition adjustment includes a decrease in the allowance for credit losses on loans of $2.5 million, and an increase in the allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures of $400,000, net of the corresponding decrease in deferred tax assets of $0.4 million. Results for the periods beginning after January 1, 2020 are presented under ASC 326 and follows the current expected credit loss methodology. Prior periods continue to be reported in accordance with previously applicable U.S. GAAP, which followed the incurred credit losses methodology. The following policies noted are under the current expected credit losses methodology. A summary of the Company's previous policies under the incurred credit losses methodology follows at the end of this section. Under the current expected credit loss model, the ACL on loans is a valuation allowance estimated at the balance sheet date in accordance with U.S. GAAP that is deducted from the loans’ amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loans.
The Company estimates the ACL on loans based on the underlying assets’ amortized cost basis, which is the amount at which the financing receivable is originated or acquired, adjusted for applicable accretion or amortization of premium, discount, collection of cash, and charge-offs. In the event that collection of principal becomes uncertain, the Company has policies in place to reverse accrued interest in a timely manner. Therefore, the Company has made a policy election to exclude accrued interest from the amortized cost basis.
Expected credit losses are reflected in the ACL through a charge to the provision for credit loss expense. When the Company deems all or a portion of a financial asset to be uncollectible, the appropriate amount is written off and the ACL is reduced by the same amount. In general, the principal balance of a loan is charged off in full or in part when management concludes, based on the available facts and circumstances, that collection of principal in full is not probable. In addition, the Company has reserves for expected recoveries where the Company reviews the prior four quarter charge offs and applies a recovery rate based on the Company’s historical experience. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the ACL when received.
The Company measures expected credit losses of financial assets at the loan level by segment, by pooling loans when the financial assets share similar risk characteristics. Depending on the nature of the pool of financial assets with similar risk characteristics, the Company uses a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) method to estimate the expected credit losses. Allowance on loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis. The Company assigns a credit risk rating to all commercial and commercial real estate loans. The Company reviews commercial and commercial real estate loans rated Substandard or worse, on nonaccrual, and greater than $250,000 for loss potential and when deemed appropriate, assigns an allowance based on an individual evaluation.
The Company’s methodologies for estimating the ACL consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows, including information about past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The methodologies apply historical loss information, adjusted for asset-specific characteristics, economic conditions at the measurement date, and forecasts about future economic conditions expected to exist through the contractual lives of the financial assets that are reasonable and supportable, to the identified pools of financial assets with similar risk characteristics for
74
Table of Contents