Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-31 | 2025-06-26 | described here | not extracted | not extracted | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · Fromtimetotime,Starzisinvolvedincertainclaimsandlegalproceedingsarisinginthe normalcourseofbusiness.Whiletheresolutionofthesematterscannotbepredictedwithcertainty,Starzdoes notbelieve,basedoncurrentknowledge,thattheoutcomeofanycurrentlypendinglegalproceedingsinwhich Starziscurrentlyinvolvedwillhave a materialadverseeffecton Starz’sconsolidatedfinancialposition,results of operationsor cash flow. For additional information regarding certain legal proceedings in which Starz is involved, see “Risk Factors—Purported noteholders have instituted suit against Starz claiming that it breached the indenture governing certain 5.5% senior notes due 2029 by virtue of an amendment executed in connection with an exchange by certain noteholders for new notes.” | ||||||
| 2024-03-31 | 2024-05-30 | in the notes | effective | not extracted | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · From time to time, the Company is involved in certain claims and legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe, based on current knowledge, that the outcome of any currently pending legal proceedings in which the Company is currently involved will have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flow. For a discussion of certain claims and legal proceedings, see Note 17 - Commitments and Contingencies to our consolidated financial statements, which discussion is incorporated by reference into this Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment, our management has concluded that, as of March 31, 2024, the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting. | ||||||
| 2023-03-31 | 2023-05-25 | in the notes | effective | not extracted | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · From time to time, the Company is involved in certain claims and legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe, based on current knowledge, that the outcome of any currently pending legal proceedings in which the Company is currently involved will have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flow. For a discussion of certain claims and legal proceedings, see Note 17 - Commitments and Contingencies to our consolidated financial statements, which discussion is incorporated by reference into this Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment, our management has concluded that, as of March 31, 2023, the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting. | ||||||
| 2022-03-31 | 2022-05-26 | in the notes | effective | not extracted | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · From time to time, the Company is involved in certain claims and legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe, based on current knowledge, that the outcome of any currently pending legal proceedings in which the Company is currently involved will have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flow. For a discussion of certain claims and legal proceedings, see Note 17 - Commitments and Contingencies to our consolidated financial statements, which discussion is incorporated by reference into this Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment, our management has concluded that, as of March 31, 2022, the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting. | ||||||
| 2021-03-31 | 2021-05-28 | in the notes | effective | not extracted | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · From time to time, the Company is involved in certain claims and legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe, based on current knowledge, that the outcome of any currently pending legal proceedings in which the Company is currently involved will have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flow. For a discussion of certain claims and legal proceedings, see Note 18- Commitments and Contingencies to our consolidated financial statements, which discussion is incorporated by reference into this Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment, our management has concluded that, as of March 31, 2021, the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.