| Size & multiples | |||
| Market Cap | $59.20B | Enterprise Value | $90.02B |
| P/E (TTM) | 32.93× | PEG (trailing) | — |
| P/S | 4.37× | P/FCF | — |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.96× | EV/EBIT | 25.91× |
| EV/Sales | 6.64× | EV/FCF | — |
| FCF Yield | −9.87% | Buyback Yield | 0.04% |
| Owner Earnings (TTM) | $1.96B | Owner Earnings Yield | 3.31% |
| Shareholder Yield | 2.79% | ||
| Cost of capital & EVAmethodology → | |||
| Beta (5y monthly) | 0.57 | Risk-free (assumed) | 4.00% |
| Equity risk premium (assumed) | 5.00% | Cost of Equity | 6.85% |
| After-tax Cost of Debt | 2.92% | Synthetic credit rating | BB+ |
| Cost of Debt · embedded (pre-tax) | 4.80% | Cost of Debt · marginal (synthetic) | 5.38% |
| WACC | 5.50% | ROIC | 2.89% |
| EVA Spread (ROIC−WACC) | −2.61% | EVA | -$1.82B |
FCF sits 399% below owner earnings — spending above maintenance (growth capex) or absorbing working capital, so FCF understates the steady-state cash the business throws off.
Synthetic rating = ICR-based credit-quality read (Damodaran), not an agency rating.
Flows TTM (last 4 quarters); latest annual for: EPS (Diluted) · EPS TTM $2.75 · revenue TTM $13.55B · FCF TTM -$5.84B
Output of a disclosed model whose assumptions may be wrong — research information, not investment advice. See the Disclaimer.
Rich vs Utilities on P/E
P/E 88th percentile in the Utilities pool — placement read per multiple; the API emits no single blended figure, so none is shown.
Compared against all 161 Utilities names we cover — one sector-wide pool, so the median skews toward smaller (often unprofitable) companies. Try the Size band for a cap-matched read.
| Metric | This (FY) | Peer median | IQR (25–75) | %ile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 32.9x | 20.0x | 15.1x–25.2x | 88 ↑rich |
| FCF Yield | -10.2% | -1.5% | -6.4%–2.7% | 15 ↓weak |
| Dividend Yield | 2.7% | 2.9% | 2.3%–3.7% | 43 ↓weak |
| Net Margin | 13.4% | 12.5% | 6.4%–18.2% | 54 ↑strong |
| ROE | 5.8% | 9.3% | 6.9%–12.3% | 23 ↓weak |
