Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

REX US Equity

REX AMERICAN RESOURCES CorpMaterials · Industrial Organic Chemicals · CIK 744187 · FY ends Jan 31
$44.67
+0.28 (+0.63%)
USD · as of 2026-08-21 · marketstack

REX · 10-K · period ended 2023-01-31

← all REX documents
filed 2023-03-30 · EDGAR original ↗

Our rendering of the filing — original pagination and typography are not reproduced, and tables are reduced to their short label cells (the figures live on FA). Nothing is summarized: every line below is the filing's own text.

blocks 1600 of 2,065180k characters rendered

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2023 COMMISSION FILE NO. 001-09097

REX AMERICAN RESOURCES CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including

area code (937) 276-3931

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b)

of the Act:

Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $.01 par value REX New York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned

issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐No☑

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not

required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐No☑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant

(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months

(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements

for the past 90 days. Yes☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant

has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during

the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes☑

No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant

is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.

See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”

and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one):

Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer☑ Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller

reporting company ☐Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check

mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting

standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant

has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial

reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or

issued its audit report. Yes ☑ No ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section

12(b) of the Act, indicated by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction

of an error to previous issued financial statements. Yes ☐ No ☑

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error

corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s

executive offices during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). Yes ☐ No ☑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant

is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes ☐ No ☑

At the close of business on July 31, 2022, the

aggregate market value of the registrant’s outstanding Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant (for purposes of this

calculation, 2,124,645 shares beneficially owned by directors and executive officers of the registrant were treated as being held by affiliates

of the registrant), was $493,699,933.

There were 17,390,019 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of March 29, 2023

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Portions of REX American Resources Corporation’s

definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders on June 15, 2023 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this

Form 10-K.

Forward-Looking

Statements

This Form 10-K contains or may contain forward-looking

statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements can be identified by use of forward-looking

terminology such as “may,” “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate” or

“continue” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. Readers are cautioned that there

are risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those referred to in such forward-looking

statements. These risks and uncertainties include the risk factors set forth from time to time in the Company’s filings with the

Securities and Exchange Commission and include among other things: the effect of pandemics such as COVID-19 on the Company’s business

operations, including impacts on supplies, demand, personnel and other factors, the impact of legislative and regulatory changes, the

price volatility and availability of corn, distillers grains, ethanol, non-food grade corn oil, gasoline and natural gas, commodity market

risk, ethanol plants operating efficiently and according to forecasts and projections, logistical interruptions, changes in the international,

national or regional economies, the impact of inflation, the ability to attract employees, weather, results of income tax audits, changes

in income tax laws or regulations, the impact of U.S. foreign trade policy, changes in foreign currency exchange rates and the effects

of terrorism or acts of war. The Company does not intend to update publicly any forward-looking statements except as required by law.

Other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements are set forth in Item

1A.

Available

Information

REX makes available free of charge on its Internet

website its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports as

soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. REX’s Internet website

address is www.rexamerican.com. The contents of the Company’s website are not a part of this

report.

PART

I

Item 1. Business

References to “we”, “us”,

“our”, “REX” or “the Company” refer to REX American Resources Corporation and its majority owned subsidiaries.

Fiscal Year

All references in this report to a particular

fiscal year are to REX’s fiscal year ended January 31. We refer to our fiscal year by reference to the year immediately preceding

the January 31 fiscal year end date. For example, “fiscal year 2022” means the period February 1, 2022 to January 31, 2023.

Corporate History and Background

REX was incorporated in Delaware in 1984 as a

holding company. Our principal offices are located at 7720 Paragon Road, Dayton, Ohio 45459. Our telephone number is (937) 276-3931.

In 2006, we started investing in ethanol production

facilities. We are currently invested in three ethanol production entities – One Earth Energy, LLC (“One Earth”), NuGen

Energy, LLC (“NuGen”), and Big River Resources, LLC (“Big River”). We own a majority interest in One Earth and

NuGen. We also own a majority interest in an entity that owned and, until November 18, 2021, operated a refined coal facility. As we have

ceased operating the refined coal facility, we began classifying the financial results of the operating segment as discontinued operations.

We now have one reportable segment, ethanol and by-products.

General Overview

We reported net income attributable to REX common

shareholders of $27.7 million in fiscal 2022 compared to approximately $52.4 million in fiscal 2021. Our ethanol business had reduced

profits in fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021 as a result of lower crush spreads in fiscal 2022. The two largest drivers of ethanol profitability

are corn and ethanol pricing, both of which experienced significant volatility within the year. Chicago Board of Trade corn prices per

bushel ranged from a low of $5.64 in July 2022 to a high of $8.18 in April 2022. S&P Global Platts ethanol pricing per gallon ranged

from a low of $1.99 in February 2022 to a high of $2.88 in June 2022.

The form and structure of our ethanol investments

are tailored to the specific needs and goals of each project and the local farmer group or investor with whom we partner. We generally

participate in the oversight of our projects through our membership on the board of managers of the limited liability companies that own

the plants. We provide management oversight and direction with respect to most aspects of plant operations for our consolidated ethanol

companies. We have equity investments in three entities engaged in the production of ethanol as of January 31, 2023. The following table

is a summary of our ethanol entity ownership interests at January 31, 2023:

Entity REX’s Current Ownership Interest

One Earth Energy, LLC 75.8%

NuGen Energy, LLC 99.7%

The three entities own a total of six ethanol

production facilities, which in aggregate shipped approximately 691 millions gallons of ethanol over the twelve-month period ended January

31, 2023. REX’s effective ownership of gallons shipped, for the twelve-month period ended January 31, 2023, by the ethanol production

facilities in which we have ownership interests was approximately 271 million gallons.

Our ethanol operations are highly dependent on

commodity prices, especially prices for corn, ethanol, distillers grains, non-food grade corn oil and natural gas, and availability of

corn. As a result of price volatility for these commodities, our operating results can fluctuate substantially. The price and availability

of corn is subject to significant fluctuations depending upon several factors that affect commodity prices in general, including crop

conditions, the amount of corn stored on farms, weather, federal policy, foreign trade and international disruptions caused by wars or

conflicts. Because the market prices of ethanol and distillers grains are not always directly related to corn prices (for

example, demand for crude and other energy and related prices, the export market demand for ethanol and distillers grains, soybean meal

prices, and the results of federal policy decisions and trade negotiations), at times ethanol and distillers grains prices may

not follow movements in corn prices. In an environment of higher corn prices or lower ethanol or distillers grains prices, the overall

margin structure at the plants could be reduced. As a result, at times, we may operate our plants at negative or minimally positive operating

margins.

We expect our ethanol plants to produce approximately

2.9 gallons of denatured ethanol for each bushel of grain processed in the production cycle. We refer to the actual gallons of denatured

ethanol produced per bushel of grain processed as the realized yield. We refer to the difference between the price per gallon of ethanol

and the price per bushel of grain (divided by the realized yield) as the “crush spread.” Should the crush

spread decline,

it is possible that our ethanol plants will generate operating results that do not provide adequate cash flows for sustained periods of

time. In such cases, production at the ethanol plants may be reduced or stopped altogether in order to minimize variable costs at individual

plants.

We attempt to manage the risk related to the volatility

of commodity prices by utilizing forward grain and natural gas purchase contracts, forward ethanol, distillers grains and non-food grade

corn oil sale contracts, and commodity futures agreements, as management deems appropriate. We attempt to match quantities of these sales

contracts with an appropriate quantity of grain purchase contracts over a given period of time when we can obtain an adequate gross margin

resulting from the crush spread inherent in the contracts we have executed. However, the market for future ethanol sales contracts generally

lags the spot market with respect to ethanol prices. Consequently, we generally execute fixed price contracts for no more than four months

into the future at any given time and we may lock in our corn or ethanol price without having a corresponding locked in ethanol or corn

price for short durations of time. As a result of the relatively short period of time our fixed price contracts cover, we generally cannot

predict the future movements in our realized crush spread for more than four months; thus, we are unable to predict the likelihood or

amounts of future income or loss from the operations of our ethanol facilities.

On August 10, 2017, we purchased, through a 95.35%

owned subsidiary, for approximately $12.0 million, the entire ownership interest of an entity that owned a refined coal facility. We began

operating the refined coal facility immediately after the acquisition. As the plant was no longer eligible to receive federal production

tax credits beginning on November 18, 2021, we ceased operations on that date and subsequently sold the facility. We began classifying

this operation as discontinued operations in the third quarter of fiscal 2021.

Through our affiliate, One Earth Energy, LLC,

we are in the exploratory stage of a carbon sequestration project near the One Earth Energy ethanol plant. A test well has been drilled

to a total depth of approximately 7,100 feet, in which almost 2,000 feet of Mt. Simon Sandstone was encountered, which represents the

region’s primary carbon storage resource. Three-dimensional seismic testing has been performed, as well as geological modeling for

predicting the movement of injected carbon and the plume area to determine maximum injection pressure, reservoir quality and storage capacity

for the potential wells. We have applied for a Class VI injection well permit for three wells with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

(“EPA”). In addition, we have signed a construction contract to capture, dehydrate, and compress carbon to a state suitable

for sequestration for the One Earth Energy ethanol plant. We are currently working on an engineering design study for a short pipeline

to deliver carbon from the ethanol plant to the sequestration site. Although we have made meaningful progress, we continue to complete

documents required from various government agencies and obtain other approvals with no assurances of ultimate success. If successful,

we believe we would qualify for tax credits under section 45Q of the Internal Revenue Code (“45Q”) and section 45Z of the

Internal Revenue Code (“45Z”) as outlined in the Inflation Reduction Act.

During fiscal year 2013, we entered into a joint

venture to file and defend patents for eSteam technology. The patented technology is an enhanced method of heavy oil recovery involving

zero emissions downhole steam generation. To date, we have not successfully had a field operation nor demonstrated that the technology

is commercially feasible. We own 60% and our partner owns 40% of the entity named Future Energy, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company.

We have no current plans to operate this technology and are maintaining patents in limited countries.

We plan to seek and evaluate various investment

opportunities including energy related, carbon sequestration, agricultural and other ventures we believe fit our investment criteria.

We can make no assurances that we will be successful in our efforts to find such opportunities.

Ethanol Industry

Ethanol is a renewable fuel produced by processing

corn and other biomass through a fermentation process that creates combustible alcohol that can be used as a fuel additive to reduce vehicle

emissions from gasoline, as an octane enhancer to improve the octane rating of gasoline with which it is blended and, to a lesser extent,

as a gasoline substitute. The majority of ethanol produced in the United States is made from corn because of its wide availability and

ease of convertibility from large amounts of carbohydrates into glucose, the key ingredient in the fermentation process that is used in

producing alcohol. Ethanol production can also use feedstocks such as grain sorghum, switchgrass, wheat, barley, potatoes and sugarcane

as carbohydrate sources. Most ethanol plants have been located near large corn production areas, such as Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Minnesota,

Nebraska, Ohio and South Dakota. Railway access and interstate access are vital for ethanol facilities due to the large amount of raw

materials and finished goods required to be shipped to and from the facilities. An adequate supply of natural gas is key to maintaining

optimal operating levels.

According to the Renewable Fuels Association (“RFA”),

the United States ethanol industry produced an estimated 15.4 billion gallons of ethanol in 2022, compared to 15.0 billion gallons in

2021. Approximately 1.4 billion gallons were exported from the United States in 2022. According to the RFA, the United States ethanol

industry consists of 199 plants in 25 states with an annual capacity of approximately 17.9 billion gallons of ethanol production.

Domestic demand for ethanol is highly dependent

upon federal and state legislation and regulations. On December 19, 2007, the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (the “Energy

Act of 2007”) was enacted. The Energy Act of 2007 established new levels of renewable fuel mandates, including two different categories

of renewable fuels: conventional biofuels and advanced biofuels. The federal government mandates the use of renewable fuels under Renewable

Fuel Standard II (“RFS II”), established in October 2010. Corn-based ethanol is considered a conventional biofuel. There were

mandated volumes established as part of the RFS II for conventional and advanced biofuels through the year 2022. After 2022, RFS volumes

are to be determined by the EPA in coordination with the Secretaries of Energy and Agriculture. The mandated volumes for conventional

biofuel were to reach 15.0 billion gallons in 2015 and maintain that level until 2022.

The EPA has proposed conventional renewable fuel

volumes of 15.0 billion gallons for 2023 and 15.25 billion gallons for both 2024 and 2025. Additionally, the proposal for 2023 also restores

the remaining 250 million gallons previously waived in 2016.

Under RFS II, a small refiner that processes less

than 75,000 barrels of oil per day can petition the EPA for a waiver of their requirement to acquire and submit renewable identification

numbers (“RINs”). The EPA, through consultation with the Department of Energy and the Department of Agriculture, can grant

the refiner a full or partial waiver, or deny the waiver. The EPA issued 88 refinery exemptions for 2016-2018 compliance years, undercutting

the statutory renewable fuel volumes by a total of 4.3 billion gallons. The EPA has not granted any small refinery waivers for 2019-2022

and has continued that stance in the proposed volumes for 2023-2025. There remain multiple ongoing legal challenges on how the EPA has

handled the small refinery waivers.

Ethanol Production

The plants we

have invested in are designed to use the dry milling method of producing ethanol. In the dry milling process, the entire corn kernel is

first ground into flour, which is referred to as “meal,” and processed without separating out the various component parts

of the grain. The meal is processed with enzymes, chemicals and water, and then placed in a high-temperature cooker. It is then transferred

to fermenters where yeast is added and the conversion of sugar to ethanol begins. After fermentation, the resulting liquid is transferred

to distillation columns where the ethanol is separated from the remaining “stillage” for fuel uses.

The anhydrous ethanol

is then blended with a denaturant, such as natural gasoline, to render it undrinkable and thus not subject to beverage alcohol tax. With

the starch elements of the corn consumed in the above-described process, the principal by-product produced by the dry milling process

is dry distillers grains with solubles, or DDGS. DDGS is sold as a protein used in animal feed, which recovers a portion of the corn value

not absorbed in ethanol production. Depending on market and operating conditions, we may also sell modified distillers grains, or wet

distillers grains, by removing less liquid content compared to DDGS. We also generate revenues from the sale of non-food grade corn oil

produced at our facilities. Non-food grade corn oil is sold to the animal feed market, as well as biodiesel and other chemical markets.

The Primary Uses of Ethanol

Blend component. Today,

much of the ethanol blending in the U.S. is done to meet the RFS. Most regular gasoline is produced using blendstock with an octane rating

of 84, which is then increased to 87 (the minimum octane rating required in most states) by adding 10% ethanol according to the RFA. The

industry is attempting to expand ethanol blending above the current 10% for most vehicles in use. The EPA has approved the use of 15%

ethanol (“E-15”), which has an octane rating of 88, in gasoline for cars, SUV’s and light duty trucks made in 2001 and

later. Previously, the EPA had not granted E-15 the same Reid vapor pressure (“RVP”) waiver as E-10 so it could only be sold

from September 16 through May 31 for those vehicles in most markets. In May 2019, the EPA finalized regulatory changes to allow the same

RVP waiver for E-15 for the summer months that it allows for E-10. However, in July 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

overturned the EPA ruling and stated the EPA had exceeded its authority. Then in April 2022, the EPA issued an emergency waiver to allow

the sale of E-15 through May 20, 2022, and ultimately extended the waiver multiple times to allow for E-15 to be used throughout the remainder

of the 2022 summer months. Certain Midwest states petitioned the EPA to allow year round sales of E-15 in their states. On March 1, 2023,

the EPA proposed a rule to allow this to occur in eight states beginning in 2024. A public comment period on the proposed rule will be

open for 45 days.

Clean air additive. Ethanol

is employed by the refining industry as a fuel oxygenate, which when blended with gasoline, allows engines to combust fuel more completely

than gasoline that has not been oxygenated and thus reduce emissions from motor vehicles. Ethanol contains 35% oxygen, which results in

more complete combustion of the fuel in the engine cylinder. Oxygenated gasoline is used to help meet certain federal and air emission

standards.

Octane enhancer. Ethanol

increases the octane rating of gasoline with which it is blended. Octane is a measure of fuel performance. Ethanol is used by gasoline

suppliers as an octane enhancer both for producing regular grade gasoline from lower octane blending stocks and for upgrading regular

gasoline to premium grades.

Legislation

The United States ethanol industry is highly dependent

upon federal and state legislation. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for a discussion of legislation affecting the U.S. ethanol industry.

Refined Coal Facility

On August 10, 2017, we purchased, through a 95.35%

owned subsidiary, the entire ownership interest of an entity that owned a refined coal facility. We began operating the refined coal facility

immediately after the acquisition. Using licensed technology, our plant applied two separate chemicals to convert feedstock coal into

refined coal, which was sold to the end user of the refined coal. The refined coal operating results were subsidized by federal production

tax credits through November 18, 2021, subject to meeting qualified emissions reductions as governed by Section 45 of the IRC. We ceased

operating the facility on November 18,

2021 and subsequently sold the facility. We began to report these results as discontinued operations

in the third quarter of 2021.

Section 45 of the IRC was created by Congress

to encourage the development and use of environmentally sound solutions to control harmful emissions during energy production and to facilitate

and move the United States towards better compliance with global environmental energy standards. The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004

amended Section 45 of the IRC by adding provisions to incentivize the production of emission reducing refined coal. To qualify for tax

credits under Section 45 of the IRC, a process must reduce coal emissions of nitrogen oxide by 20% and either sulfur dioxide or mercury

by 40%.

Facilities

As of our fiscal year end, our consolidated ethanol

entities owned a combined 1,342 acres of land and two facilities that shipped a combined quantity of approximately 266 million gallons

of ethanol in fiscal year 2022. We also own our corporate headquarters office building, consisting of approximately 7,500 square feet,

located in Dayton, Ohio.

Human Capital Resources

The

attraction, retention and development of employees is critical to our success. We accomplish these objectives through a variety of actions,

including our competitive compensation policies, training initiatives and growth opportunities within our Company. At January 31, 2023,

we had 122 employees at our two consolidated ethanol plants and at our corporate headquarters. None of our employees are represented by

a labor union. We expect this employment level to remain relatively stable. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good.

We took measures to protect

the health and safety of our employees during the COVID-19 pandemic while continuing to meet the needs of our customers. We continue to

monitor the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, including our employees, and take appropriate actions to mitigate the impact,

including emphasizing CDC guidelines.

We conduct regularly scheduled

safety meetings and require all employees to go through safety training. We evaluate employee safety incidents monthly and investigate

such incidents promptly. In addition, we conduct periodic safety audits performed by an independent third party. A portion of our incentive

compensation plan rewards employees for attaining certain safety goals.

We believe we offer market competitive

compensation and benefit programs for our employees. In addition to competitive base wages, all employees are eligible for an incentive

compensation program, a Company matched 401(k) plan, healthcare benefits, and paid time off.

Service Marks

We have registered the service marks “REX”

and “Farmer’s Energy” with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. We are not aware of any adverse claims concerning

our service marks.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We encourage you to carefully consider the risks

described below and other information contained in this report when considering an investment decision in REX common stock. Any of the

events discussed in the risk factors below may occur. If one or more of these events do occur, our results of operations, financial condition

or cash flows could be materially adversely affected. In this instance, the trading price of REX stock could decline, and investors might

lose all or part of their investment.

Risks Related to our Ethanol and By-Products

Business

The ethanol industry is changing rapidly which

could result in unexpected developments that could negatively impact our operations.

According to the RFA, the ethanol industry grew

from approximately 1.5 billion gallons of domestic annual ethanol production in 1999 to a peak of approximately 16.1 billion gallons in

2018. In 2022 and 2021, the industry produced approximately 15.4 and 15.0 billion gallons, respectively, with the reduction from the peak

year reflecting industry conditions and reduced demand. Thus, there have been significant changes in the supply and demand of ethanol

over a relatively short period of time which could lead to difficulty in maintaining profitable operations at our ethanol plants.

The financial returns on our ethanol investments

are highly dependent on commodity prices, which are subject to significant volatility, uncertainty and regional supply shortages, so our

results could fluctuate substantially.

The financial returns on our

ethanol investments are highly dependent on commodity prices, especially prices for corn, natural gas, ethanol, dried distillers grains,

non-food grade corn oil and unleaded gasoline. As a result of the volatility of the prices for these items, our returns may fluctuate

substantially and our investments could experience periods of declining prices for their products and increasing costs for their raw materials,

which could result in operating losses at our ethanol plants.

Our returns on ethanol

investments are highly sensitive to grain prices.

Corn is the principal raw material

our ethanol plants use to produce ethanol and by-products. As a result, changes in the price of corn can significantly affect our businesses.

Rising corn prices result in higher production costs of ethanol and by-products. Because ethanol competes with non-corn-based fuels, our

ethanol plants may not be able to pass along increased grain costs to our customers. At certain levels, grain prices may make ethanol

uneconomical to produce.

The price of corn is influenced

by weather conditions and other factors affecting crop yields, transportation costs, farmer planting decisions, exports, foreign production,

the value of the U.S. dollar, and general domestic and foreign economic, market and regulatory factors, including, but not limited to,

the impacts from the Russian-Ukraine conflict. These factors include government policies and subsidies with respect to agriculture and

international trade and global and local demand and supply. The significance and relative effect of these factors on the price of corn

is difficult to predict. Any event that tends to negatively affect the production and/or supply of corn, such as adverse weather or crop

disease, could increase corn prices and potentially harm the business of our ethanol plants, to include intermittent production slowdowns

or stoppages. Increasing domestic ethanol production could boost the demand for corn and result in increased corn prices. International

demand for corn could also result in higher corn prices. Our ethanol plants may also have difficulty, from time to time, in physically

sourcing corn on economic terms due to regional supply shortages, transportation issues, delays in farmer marketing decisions or unfavorable

local pricing. The corn harvest near our NuGen facility

for 2022 was negatively impacted by dry weather and we expect will impact the

supply of corn until the 2023 harvest. Such a shortage or price impact could require our ethanol plants to suspend operations which would

have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations.

The spread between ethanol

and corn prices can vary significantly.

The gross margin at our ethanol

plants depends principally on the spread between ethanol and corn prices. Fluctuations in the spread are likely to continue to occur.

A sustained narrow or negative spread, whether as a result of sustained high or increased corn prices or sustained low or decreased ethanol

prices, would adversely affect the results of operations at our ethanol plants.

Our risk management strategies

may be ineffective and may expose us to decreased profitability and liquidity.

In an attempt to partially offset

the impact of volatility of commodity prices, we enter into: i) forward contracts to sell a portion of our ethanol, distillers grains,

and non-food grade corn oil production and to purchase a portion of our corn and natural gas requirements and; ii) commodity futures and

swap agreements. The financial impact of these risk management activities is dependent upon, among other items, the prices involved and

our ability to receive or deliver the commodities involved. Risk management activities can result in financial loss when positions are

purchased in a declining market or when positions are sold in an increasing market. In addition, we may not be able to match the appropriate

quantity of corn contracts with quantities of ethanol, distillers grains and non-food grade corn oil contracts. Further, our

results may be impacted by a mismatch of gains or losses associated with the positions during a reporting period when the physical commodity

purchase or sale has not yet occurred. We vary the amount and type of risk management techniques we utilize, and we may choose

not to engage in any risk management activities. Should we fail to properly manage the inherent volatility of commodity prices, our results

of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

The market for natural

gas is subject to market conditions that create uncertainty in the price and availability of the natural gas that our ethanol plants use

in their manufacturing process.

Our ethanol plants rely upon

third parties for their supply of natural gas, which is consumed as fuel in the production process. The prices for and availability of

natural gas are subject to volatile market conditions. These market conditions often are affected by factors beyond the ethanol plants’

control, such as weather conditions, overall economic conditions, governmental regulation and foreign and domestic relations, including,

but not limited to, the impacts from the Russian-Ukraine conflict. Significant disruptions in the supply of natural gas could impair or

completely prevent the ethanol plants’ ability to economically manufacture ethanol for their customers. Furthermore, increases in

natural gas prices may adversely affect results of operations and financial position at our ethanol plants.

Fluctuations in the selling price of commodities

may reduce profit margins at our ethanol plants.

Ethanol is marketed as a fuel additive to reduce

vehicle emissions from gasoline, as an octane enhancer to improve the octane rating of gasoline with which it is blended and, to a lesser

extent, as a gasoline substitute. As a result, ethanol prices are influenced by the supply and demand for gasoline, and our ethanol plants’

results of operations and financial position may be materially adversely affected if gasoline demand decreases or the price of gasoline

declines making ethanol less economical.

Distillers grains compete with other protein-based

animal feed products. The price of distillers grains may decrease when the prices of competing feed products decrease. The prices of competing

animal feed products

are based in part on the prices of the commodities from which these products are made. Historically, sales prices

for distillers grains have tracked along with the price of corn. However, there have been instances when the price increase for distillers

grains has lagged increases in corn prices.

The production of distillers grains has increased

as a result of increases in dry mill ethanol production in the United States. This could lead to price declines in what we can sell our

distillers grains for in the future. Such declines could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Increased ethanol production

or decreases in demand for ethanol may result in excess production capacity in the ethanol industry, which may cause the price of ethanol,

distillers grains and non-food grade corn oil to decrease.

According to the RFA, domestic

ethanol production capacity is approximately 17.9 billion gallons per year. Under RFS II, there were mandated volumes through 2022 for

conventional and advanced biofuels. After 2022, RFS volumes are to be determined by the EPA in coordination with the Secretaries of Energy

and Agriculture. The EPA has proposed conventional renewable fuel volumes of 15.0 billion gallons for 2023 and 15.25 billion gallons for

2024 and 2025. In addition, the proposal for 2023 also restores the remaining 250 million gallons previously waived in 2016. The implied

excess capacity over the EPA proposed volumes could have an adverse effect on the results of our operations. In a manufacturing industry

with excess capacity, producers have an incentive to manufacture additional products for so long as the price exceeds the marginal cost

of production (i.e., the cost of producing only the next unit, without regard for interest, overhead or fixed costs). This incentive could

result in the reduction of the market price of ethanol to a level that is inadequate to generate sufficient cash flow to cover costs.

Excess capacity may also result

from decreases in the demand for ethanol, which could result from a number of factors, including, but not limited to, regulatory developments

and reduced U.S. gasoline consumption. Reduced gasoline consumption could occur as a result of increased prices for gasoline or crude

oil, which could cause businesses and consumers to reduce driving or acquire vehicles with more favorable gasoline mileage or acquire

non-gasoline powered vehicles. In addition, decreased overall economic activity could also lead to reduced gasoline consumption.

In addition, because ethanol

production produces distillers grains and non-food grade corn oil as by-products, increased ethanol production will also lead to increased

supplies of distillers grains and non-food grade corn oil. An increase in the supply of distillers grains and non-food grade corn oil,

without corresponding increases in demand, could lead to lower prices or an inability to sell our ethanol plants’ distillers grains

and non-food grade corn oil production. A decline in the price of distillers grains or non-food grade corn oil could have a material adverse

effect on the results of our ethanol operations.

The price of ethanol and distillers grains

may decline as a result of trade restrictions or duties on ethanol and distillers grains exports from the United States or from unfavorable

foreign currency exchange rates.

If the United States were to withdraw from or

materially modify certain international trade agreements, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially

adversely affected. Ethanol and other products that we produce are sold into various other countries with trade agreements with the United

States. If tariffs were raised on the foreign-sourced goods that lead to retaliatory actions, it could have material adverse effect on

our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The United States exported approximately 1.4 billion

gallons of ethanol in 2022, up from approximately 1.2 and approximately 1.3 billion gallons in 2021 and 2020, respectively. In 2022 and

2021, approximately 11.4

and 11.6 million metric tons, respectively, of distillers grains were exported, which represented approximately

34% and 36%, respectively, of U.S production. If producers and exporters of ethanol and distillers grains are subject to trade restrictions,

or additional duties are imposed on exports, it may make it uneconomical to export these products. The industry has experienced various

trade policy disputes, tariffs and investigations in foreign countries that have adversely impacted the international demand for our products.

Reduced international demand could lead to further oversupply and reduce pricing.

Future demand for ethanol is uncertain and

changes in overall consumer demand for transportation fuel could affect demand.

There are limited markets for ethanol other than

what is federally mandated. Increased consumer acceptance of E15 and E85 fuel is likely necessary in order for ethanol to achieve significant

market share growth beyond federal mandate levels.

Consumer demand for gasoline may be impacted by

emerging transportation trends, such as electric vehicles. Most automobile manufacturers have made varying levels of commitments to phase

out internal combustion engine production, such as General Motors with a target date of 2035 to phase out the production of gasoline and

diesel-powered vehicles and Nissan targeting the early 2030s to convert their entire fleet to electric vehicles. There also have been

pledges to ban the sale of internal combustion engines in countries such as Japan and the United Kingdom by 2035, as well as a statewide

ban in California, which several states are imitating. If realized, these bans would accelerate the decline of liquid fuel demand and

by extension demand for ethanol, biodiesel and renewable diesel. Recent federal legislation seeks to address the ever-increasing demand

for electric vehicle infrastructure. Reduced demand for ethanol could cause our results of operations to be materially impacted.

We depend on our partners to operate certain

of our ethanol investments.

Our investments currently represent both majority

and minority equity positions. Day-to-day operating control of minority owned plants generally remains with the local investor group.

We do not have the ability to directly modify the operations of these plants in response to changes in the business environment or in

response to any deficiencies in local operations of the plants. In addition, local plant operators, who also represent the primary suppliers

of corn and other crops to the plants, may have interests, such as the price and sourcing of corn and other crops, that may differ from

our interest, which is based solely on the operating profit of the plant. The limitations on our ability to control day-to-day plant operations

could adversely affect plant results of operations.

We may not successfully acquire or develop

additional ethanol investments.

The growth of our ethanol business

depends on our ability to identify and develop new ethanol investments. Our ethanol development strategy depends on referrals, and introductions,

to new investment opportunities from industry participants, such as ethanol plant builders and owners, financial institutions, marketing

agents and others. We must continue to maintain favorable relationships with these industry participants, and a material disruption in

these sources of referrals would adversely affect our ability to expand our ethanol investments.

Any expansion strategy will

depend on prevailing market conditions for the price of ethanol and the cost of corn and natural gas and the expectations of future market

conditions. Additional financing may also be necessary to implement any expansion strategy, which may not be accessible or available on

acceptable terms. In addition, failure to adequately manage the risks associated with additional ethanol investments could have a material

adverse effect on our business.

We may not successfully develop our planned

carbon sequestration facility near the One Earth Energy ethanol plant.

The Company has committed significant time and

resources towards a carbon sequestration project near the One Earth Energy ethanol plant. The completion of this project requires numerous

government and landowner approvals. If we are not successful in obtaining all these approvals, we may not be able to complete this project

and could result in a write off of our commitments and investments.

If we are not successful on this project, our

ethanol plant could be at a disadvantage in the industry as our inability to sequester our carbon could result in a higher carbon intensity

(CI) score than our competitors if they are able to sequester their carbon. If we are unable to reduce our CI score, we may not be able

to participate in the state and federal clean fuel programs, including federal tax credits outlined in the Inflation Reduction Act.

Our ethanol plants may be adversely affected

by technological advances and efforts to anticipate and employ such technological advances may prove unsuccessful.

The development and implementation of new technologies

may result in a significant reduction in the costs of ethanol production. For instance, any technological advances in the efficiency or

cost to produce ethanol from inexpensive cellulosic sources such as corn stalk, wheat, oat or barley straw could have an adverse effect

on our ethanol plants, because our plants are designed to produce ethanol from corn, which is, by comparison, a raw material with other

high value uses. We cannot predict when, or if, new technologies may become available, the rate of acceptance of new technologies by competitors

or the costs associated with new technologies. In addition, advances in the development of alternatives to ethanol could significantly

reduce demand for or eliminate the need for ethanol.

Any advances in technology which require significant

unanticipated capital expenditures to remain competitive or which reduce demand or prices for ethanol would have a material adverse effect

on the results of our ethanol operations.

In addition, alternative fuels, additives and

oxygenates are continually under development. Alternative fuel additives that can replace ethanol may be developed, which may decrease

the demand for ethanol. It is also possible that technological advances in engine and exhaust system design and performance could reduce

the use of oxygenates, which would lower the demand for ethanol. Reduced demand for ethanol could cause our results of operations to be

materially adversely affected.

The U.S. ethanol industry is highly dependent

upon a myriad of federal and state legislation and regulation and any changes in legislation or regulation could materially and adversely

affect our results of operations and financial position.

The renewable fuel standard program was authorized

under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and was expanded under the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA). EISA increased the

amount of renewable fuel required to be blended into gasoline with RFS II and required a minimum usage of corn-derived renewable fuels

of 12.0 billion gallons in 2010, increasing annually by 600 million gallons to 15.0 billion gallons in 2015 through 2022, with no specified

volume subsequent to 2022. After 2022, RFS volumes are to be determined by the EPA in coordination with the Secretaries of Energy and

Agriculture. The EPA has the authority to assign the mandated amounts of renewable fuels to be blended into transportation fuel to individual

fuel blenders. RFS II has been a primary factor in the growth of ethanol usage. Over the past several years various pieces of legislation

have been introduced to the U.S. Congress that were intended to reduce or eliminate ethanol

blending requirements. To date, none of the

bills have been successful but they are an indication of the continued effort to undermine the EISA.

The EPA has proposed conventional renewable fuel

volumes of 15.0 billion gallons for 2023 and 15.25 billion gallons for both 2024 and 2025. Additionally, the proposal for 2023 also restores

the remaining 250 million gallons previously waived in 2016.

Obligated parties use RINs to show compliance

with RFS-mandated volumes. RINs are attached to renewable fuels by producers and detached when the renewable fuel is blended with transportation

fuel or traded in the open market. The market price of detached RINs affects the price of ethanol in certain markets and influences the

purchasing decisions by obligated parties. As a result of fluctuations in RINs pricing, certain obligated parties have petitioned the

EPA and filed court actions to change the point of obligation or to seek relief from their obligation. The EPA granted 88 total Small

Refinery Exemptions (“SREs”) for 2016 through 2018 totaling approximately 4.3 billion gallons. This action led to reduced

values for RINs, and further action could decrease RIN values and ethanol pricing.

In January 2020, the U.S Court of Appeals for

the 10th Circuit overturned the EPA’s granting of refinery exemptions to three refineries on two separate grounds. The

Court ruled refineries are eligible for SREs only if such waivers are extensions of waivers granted in previous years. The refineries

did not qualify for waivers in the year prior to the year the EPA granted them. The Court also stated the disproportionate economic hardship

of SREs should be based solely on whether compliance with RFS II creates such hardship, not whether compliance and other issues create

the hardship. Two of the refiners appealed the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, and on January 25, 2021, the Supreme Court partially

ruled in favor of the small refiners, but only as to the interpretation of “extension” of a waiver.

Flexible fuel vehicles (“FFVs”) receive

preferential treatment in meeting federally mandated corporate average fuel economy (“CAFE”) standards for automobiles manufactured

by car makers. High blend ethanol fuels such as E-85 result in lower fuel efficiencies. Absent the CAFE preferences, car makers would

not likely build flexible-fuel vehicles. In recent years, automobile manufactures have backtracked in the production of FFVs for the U.S.

Any change in CAFE preferences could reduce the growth of E-85 markets and result in lower ethanol prices.

Unfavorable changes in legislation or regulations

could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.

The inability to generate or obtain RINs could

adversely affect our operating results.

Virtually all our ethanol is sold with RINs that

are used by customers to comply with RFS II. If our production does not meet EPA requirements for RIN generation, as an efficient producer,

in the future, we would have to purchase RINs in the open market or sell our ethanol at substantially lower prices to adjust for the absence

of RINs. The price of RINs varies based on many factors and cannot be predicted. Failure to obtain sufficient RINs or reliance on invalid

RINs could subject us to fines and penalties imposed by the EPA.

Various studies have criticized the efficiency

of ethanol, in general, and corn-based ethanol in particular, which could lead to the reduction or repeal of incentives and tariffs that

promote the use and domestic production of ethanol or otherwise negatively impact public perception and acceptance of ethanol as an alternative

fuel.

Although many trade groups, academics and governmental

agencies have supported ethanol as a fuel additive that promotes a cleaner environment, others have criticized ethanol production as consuming

considerably

more energy and emitting more greenhouse gases than other biofuels and as potentially depleting water resources. Other studies

have suggested that corn-based ethanol negatively impacts consumers by causing prices to increase for dairy, meat and other foodstuffs.

If these views gain acceptance, support for existing

measures promoting use and domestic production of corn-based ethanol could decline, leading to reduction or repeal of these measures.

These views could also negatively impact public perception of the ethanol industry and acceptance of ethanol as an alternative fuel.

Federal support of cellulosic ethanol may result

in reduced incentives to corn-derived ethanol producers.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of

2009 and EISA provide funding opportunities in support of cellulosic ethanol obtained from biomass sources such as switchgrass and poplar

trees. These federal policies may suggest a long-term political preference for cellulosic processes using alternative feedstocks such

as switchgrass, silage or wood chips. Cellulosic ethanol has a smaller carbon footprint than corn-derived ethanol and is unlikely to divert

foodstuff from the market. Our plants are designed as single-feedstock facilities, located in corn production areas with limited alternative

feedstock nearby, and would require significant additional investment to convert to the production of cellulosic ethanol. The adoption

of cellulosic ethanol as the preferred form of ethanol could have a significant adverse effect on our ethanol business.

Our ethanol business is affected by environmental and other regulations

which could impede or prohibit our ability to successfully operate our plants.

Our ethanol production facilities are subject

to extensive air, water and other environmental regulations. We have had to obtain numerous permits to construct and operate our plants.

Regulatory agencies could impose conditions or other restrictions in the permits that are detrimental, or which increase our costs. More

stringent federal or state environmental regulations could be adopted which could significantly increase our operating costs or require

us to expend considerable resources.

Our ethanol plants emit various airborne pollutants

as by-products of the ethanol production process, including carbon dioxide (a greenhouse gas). In 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court classified

carbon dioxide as an air pollutant under the Clean Air Act in a case seeking to require the EPA to regulate carbon dioxide in vehicle

emissions. In February 2010, the EPA released its final regulations on the Renewable Fuel Standard program. We believe our plants are

grandfathered up to certain operating capacity, but plant expansion requires us to meet a 20% threshold reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG)

emissions from a 2005 baseline measurement to produce ethanol eligible for the RFS II mandate. To further expand our plant capacity, we

may be required to obtain additional permits, install advanced technology equipment, or reduce drying of certain amounts of distillers

grains. We may also be required to install carbon dioxide mitigation equipment or take other steps in order to comply with future laws

or regulations. Compliance with future laws or regulations with respect to emissions of carbon dioxide, or if we choose to expand capacity

at certain of our plants, compliance with then-current regulations of carbon dioxide, could be costly and may prevent us from operating

our plants as profitably, which may have a negative impact on our financial performance. We also face the risk of ethanol production above

our grandfathered capacity not qualifying for RINs if the plants do not meet certain emission requirements.

The California Air Resources Board (“CARB”)

adopted a Low Carbon Fuel Standard (“LCFS”) requiring a 10% reduction in GHG emissions from transportation fuels. An Indirect

Land Use Charge is included in this lifecycle GHG emission calculation. This standard could have an adverse impact on the market for corn-based

ethanol in California if corn-based ethanol fails to achieve lifecycle GHG emission reductions and in other states if they adopt similar

standards. This could have a negative impact on our financial performance.

Our ethanol business may become subject to

various environmental and health and safety and property damage claims and liabilities.

Operation of our ethanol business exposes the

business to the risk of environmental and health and safety claims and property damage claims, such as failure to comply with environmental

regulations. These types of claims could also be made against our ethanol business based upon the acts or omissions of other persons.

Serious claims could have a material negative impact on our results of operations, financial position and future cash flows.

During the early months of 2020, a new strain

of COVID-19 spread into the United States and other countries.

In an effort to contain the spread of this virus,

there were various government mandated restrictions, in addition to voluntary privately implemented restrictions, including limiting public

gatherings, retail store closures, restrictions on employees working and the quarantining of people who may have been exposed to the virus.

The above actions led to reduced demand for ethanol. Although most restrictions have been lifted, if in the future the virus continues

to mutate or other viruses surface, it could lead to prolonged production stoppages at our ethanol plants and could result in an adverse

material impact on the results of operations and on our financial position. We idled our NuGen and One Earth ethanol plants for portions

of fiscal year 2020, largely due to the impact of the pandemic.

Our business is not diversified.

Our financial results depend heavily on our ability

to operate our ethanol plants profitably. Our lack of diversification could have a material negative impact on our results of operations,

financial position and future cash flows should our ethanol plants operate unprofitably.

We may not be able to meet commitments to produce

and sell ethanol.

We may, at times, sell our products with forward

contracts. If we are unable to produce the products due to economic conditions, business interruption, or other factors, we may incur

additional costs or have to obtain commodities at unfavorable prices to meet our contractual commitments. This could have a material adverse

effect on our results of operations.

We may not be able to meet commitments to purchase

commodities.

We may, at times, purchase certain commodities

with forward contracts without a corresponding quantity of ethanol sold via forward contracts at known prices. Should ethanol and by-product

prices decline to levels that would lead to significant unprofitable results of operations, we may incur additional costs and/or losses

to meet our contractual commitments. This could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our revenue from the sale of distillers grains

depends upon its continued market acceptance as an animal feed.

Distillers grains is a by-product from the fermentation

Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain) · 10-K for the period ended 2023-01-31, filed 2023-03-30 · accession 0000930413-23-001143

Filing HTML rendered to line-structured narrative text by the shipped reducer (datafeeds.edgar_fulltext.visible_text, keep_table_headers=True): scripts and inline-XBRL headers are dropped, and table content is reduced to its short label cells — numeric table data is not rendered and is therefore not counted. The same rendering is used for every year, so a year-over-year comparison is like for like.

The text is our rendering of the filing, not a facsimile: original pagination, typography and tables are not reproduced, and the numbers live in the financial statements (FA).

The outline locates item HEADINGS in this document. Only Items 1A and 7 have certified boundaries elsewhere in the terminal (the redline and the narrative-overlap number); every span here runs from one heading found to the next heading found.

How the outline was chosen. It is the longest chain of item headings that runs forward through both the document and the standard item order: 17 headings are on that chain and 0 further heading-shaped lines are not — the table-of-contents echo of every item, cross-references and exhibit-list mentions. Each entry's length is measured from its heading to the next heading on the chain.