Richardson Electronics, Ltd. RELL US Equity
Richardson Electronics, Ltd. (Nasdaq: RELL), an SEC filer in Wholesale-Electronic Parts & Equipment, NEC, closed at $17.71, -1.6%, on 2026-08-28, with a market cap of $194M as of 2026-08-27, a return on equity of -0.7%, a net margin of -0.5% and 3-year sales growth of -2.4%. Institutional ownership, earnings history and filed financials are on the tabs below.
Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-30 | 2026-08-03 | none stated | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · None. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on that assessment, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of May 30, 2026. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of May 30, 2026, at a reasonable assurance level. | ||||||
| 2025-05-31 | 2025-08-04 | none stated | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · None. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on that assessment, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of May 31, 2025. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of May 31, 2025, at a reasonable assurance level. | ||||||
| 2024-06-01 | 2024-08-05 | none stated | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · None. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on that assessment, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 1, 2024. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 1, 2024, at a reasonable assurance level. | ||||||
| 2023-05-27 | 2023-07-31 | none stated | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · None. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on that assessment, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of May 27, 2023. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of May 27, 2023 at a reasonable assurance level. | ||||||
| 2022-05-28 | 2022-08-01 | described here | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · On April 2, 2021, as part of a settlement where the Company did not admit liability, Richardson agreed to pay Varex Imaging Corporation (“Varex”) $1.6 million to settle alleged counts of patent infringement and claims of trade secret misappropriation. This settlement was recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses within the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the third quarter of fiscal 2021. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on that assessment, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of May 28, 2022. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of May 28, 2022 at a reasonable assurance level. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.