Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-31 | 2026-03-12 | none stated | NOT effective | NOT effective | remediated (prior year) | EDGAR |
Item 3 · From time to time, we may become involved in legal proceedings or be subject to claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. We are currently not a party to any material legal or administrative proceedings, and we are not aware of any pending or threatened material legal or administrative proceedings against us. Item 9A · ICFR · As a result, based on the COSO criteria, the Company’s management has concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e), were not effective at the reasonable assurance level due to a previously identified material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to controls ensuring data received from third-party service organizations were complete and accurate. | ||||||
| 2024-12-31 | 2025-03-20 | none stated | NOT effective | NOT effective | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · From time to time, we may become involved in legal proceedings or be subject to claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. We are currently not a party to any material legal or administrative proceedings, and we are not aware of any pending or threatened material legal or administrative proceedings against us. Item 9A · ICFR · As a result, based on the COSO criteria, the Company’s management has concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, due to a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e), were not effective at the reasonable assurance level. | ||||||
| 2023-12-31 | 2024-04-15 | none stated | NOT effective | NOT effective | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · From time to time, we may become involved in legal proceedings or be subject to claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. We are currently not a party to any material legal or administrative proceedings, and we are not aware of any pending or threatened material legal or administrative proceedings against us. Item 9A · ICFR · As a result, based on the COSO criteria, the Company’s management has concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, due to a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e), were not effective at the reasonable assurance level. | ||||||
| 2022-12-31 | 2023-03-10 | as filed | NOT effective | NOT effective | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We have no current legal proceedings. Item 9A · ICFR · As a result, based on the COSO criteria, the Company’s management has concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, due to a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e), were not effective at the reasonable assurance level. | ||||||
| 2021-12-31 | 2022-02-28 | as filed | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We have no current legal proceedings. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment using those criteria, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2021. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e), were effective at the reasonable assurance level. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.