Marimed Inc. MRMD US Equity
Marimed Inc. (OTC: MRMD), an SEC filer in Medicinal Chemicals & Botanical Products, closed at $0.09, -3.2%, on 2026-08-28, with a market cap of $36M as of 2026-08-27, a net margin of -9.1% and 3-year sales growth of 5.1%. Institutional ownership, earnings history and filed financials are on the tabs below.
Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-31 | 2026-03-12 | described here | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · There has been no material change to the status of the Company’s previously reported legal proceedings. From time to time, the Company may become involved in litigation or regulatory proceedings in the ordinary course of its business, including litigation or regulatory proceedings that could become more material to the Company's business. The cannabis industry is highly regulated, and many aspects of the Company's business involve substantial risk of liability. Further, in past years, there has been an increasing incidence of litigation involving the cannabis industry including class action suits that generally seek substantial damages, and in some cases, punitive damages. Compliance problems that are reported to federal/state regulatory authorities, by dissatisfied customers are often investigated by such regulatory bodies, and, if pursued by a regulatory body or customer, may rise to the level of litigation or disciplinary action. Further, as a significant employer of full- and part-time employees, from time to time in the ordinary course of business, the Company faces claims and threatened claims from former employees alleging wrongful termination and other similar alleged wrong… Item 9A · ICFR · Based on that assessment and using the COSO criteria, our management concluded that, as of December 31, 2025, our internal control over financial reporting was effective. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based upon that evaluation, our management concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) are accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. | ||||||
| 2024-12-31 | 2025-03-06 | described here | NOT effective | NOT effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · Bankruptcy Claim In 2019, MariMed Hemp, Inc. ("MMH"), a subsidiary of the Company, sold hemp seed inventory to GenCanna Global Inc. ("GenCanna"), recording a related party receivable of approximately $29 million, which was fully reserved at December 31, 2019. In early 2020, GenCanna entered into a Chapter 11 bankruptcy, leading to a liquidating plan that remains ongoing. In 2022, the Plan Administrator filed a complaint against MMH for alleged preferential transfers, which was settled in 2023 by reducing MMH's general unsecured claims to $15.5 million. In 2024, MMH received a liquidation distribution of $116,250. As of the date of this filing, there is insufficient information to determine the amount of further liquidation distributions, if any, that MMH may receive on account of its general unsecured claim. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on that assessment and using the COSO criteria, our management concluded that, as of December 31, 2024, our internal control over financial reporting was ineffective. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based upon that evaluation, our management concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures are ineffective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) are accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. | ||||||
| 2023-12-31 | 2024-03-07 | described here | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · Bankruptcy Claim During 2019, the Company’s subsidiary, MariMed Hemp, Inc. ("MHI") sold and delivered hemp seed inventory to GenCanna Global Inc., a Kentucky-based cultivator, producer, and distributor of hemp (“GenCanna”). At the time of sale, the Company owned a 33.5% ownership interest in GenCanna. The Company recorded a related party receivable of approximately $29 million from the sale, which was fully reserved at December 31, 2019. On January 24, 2020, an involuntary bankruptcy proceeding under Chapter 11 was filed against GenCanna and its wholly-owned subsidiary, OGGUSA Inc. (f/k/a GenCanna Global US, Inc.) ("OGGUSA" and together with GenCanna, the "OGGUSA Debtors") in the United States Bankruptcy Court in the Eastern District of Kentucky (the "Bankruptcy Court"). In February 2020, the OGGUSA Debtors, agreed to convert the involuntary bankruptcy proceeding into a voluntary Chapter 11 proceeding. The OGGUSA Debtors' subsidiary, Hemp Kentucky LLC, also filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11 in the Bankruptcy Court. In May 2020, after an abbreviated solicitation/bid/sale process, the Bankruptcy Court, over numerous objections by creditors and shareholders of the OGGUSA Debt… Item 9A · ICFR · Based on that assessment and using the COSO criteria, our management have concluded that, as of December 31, 2023, our internal control over financial reporting was effective. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based upon that evaluation, our management concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) are accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive and interim chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. | ||||||
| 2022-12-31 | 2023-03-03 | described here | NOT effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · Bankruptcy Claim During 2019, the Company’s MMH subsidiary sold and delivered hemp seed inventory to OGG, Inc. (f/k/a GenCanna Global Inc.), a Kentucky-based cultivator, producer, and distributor of hemp (“GenCanna”). At the time of sale, the Company owned a 33.5% ownership interest in GenCanna. The Company recorded a related party receivable of approximately $29 million from the sale, which was fully reserved at December 31, 2019. On January 24, 2020, an involuntary bankruptcy proceeding under Chapter 11 was filed against GenCanna and its wholly-owned subsidiary, OGGUSA Inc. (f/k/a GenCanna Global US, Inc.) ("OGGUSA" and together with GenCanna, the "OGGUSA Debtors") in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Eastern District of Kentucky (the "Bankruptcy Court"). In February 2020, the OGGUSA Debtors, under pressure from certain of its creditors including its senior lender MGG Investment Group LP (MGG"), agreed to convert the involuntary bankruptcy proceeding into a voluntary Chapter 11 proceeding. The OGGUSA Debtors' subsidiary, Hemp Kentucky LLC, also filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11 in the Bankruptcy Court. In May 2020, after an abbreviated solicitation/bid/sale process, the B… Item 9A · ICFR · Based on that assessment and using the COSO criteria, our CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of December 31, 2022, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective due to the lack of a formalized and complete set of policy and procedure documentation evidencing our Company’s system of internal controls over financial reporting (“Lack of Formal Documentation”). Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) are accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. | ||||||
| 2021-12-31 | 2022-03-16 | described here | NOT effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · Terminated Employment Agreement In July 2019, Thomas Kidrin, the former chief executive officer and a former director of the Company, filed a complaint in the Massachusetts Superior Court which alleged the Company failed to pay all wages owed to him and breached his employment agreement, and requested multiple damages, attorney fees, costs, and interest. The Company moved to dismiss certain counts of the complaint and asserted counterclaims against Mr. Kidrin which alleged breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, money had and received, and unjust enrichment. While the Company’s motion to dismiss was pending, the parties entered into a settlement agreement and general release in August 2021 whereby, among other conditions, (i) Mr. Kidrin’s complaint was dismissed with prejudice, (ii) the Company issued to Mr. Kidrin five-year warrants to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share, (iii) the Company irrevocably transferred intangible assets relating to the online virtual worlds business the Company had conducted in early 2014, prior to its pivot into the legal cannabis industry (such assets had zero carrying value on th… Item 9A · ICFR · Based on that assessment and using the COSO criteria, the CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of December 31, 2021, its internal control over financial reporting was not effective due to the lack of a formalized and complete set of policy and procedure documentation evidencing the Company’s system of internal controls over financial reporting (“Lack of Formal Documentation”). Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act (i) are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) are accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.