Mind Technology, Inc MIND US Equity
Mind Technology, Inc (Nasdaq: MIND), an SEC filer in Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical Sys, closed at $4.34, -2.5%, on 2026-08-28, with a market cap of $40M as of 2026-08-27, a trailing P/E of 49.4, a return on equity of 2.2%, a net margin of 1.8% and 3-year sales growth of 17.9%. Institutional ownership, earnings history and filed financials are on the tabs below.
Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-31 | 2026-04-20 | none stated | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · From time to time, we are a party to legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment, our management, including our principal executive officers and principal financial officer, concluded that, as of January 31, 2026, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our current disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of January 31, 2026, at the reasonable assurance level. | ||||||
| 2025-01-31 | 2025-04-25 | none stated | not extracted | not extracted | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · From time to time, we are a party to legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our current disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of January 31, 2025, at the reasonable assurance level. Item 9A · material weakness · As disclosed in Part II Item 9A Controls and Procedures in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2024, we had a material weakness in our controls over financial reporting because the Company performed less-than-complete physical inventory at year-end because it placed reliance on other compensating controls during the year, including cycle counts and controls involving receipt and disbursement of inventory. | ||||||
| 2024-01-31 | 2024-04-30 | none stated | NOT effective | not extracted | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · From time to time, we are a party to legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. Item 9A · ICFR · Solely as a result of such material weakness, the Company’s executive officers determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective at the reasonable assurance level as of January 31, 2024. Item 9A · material weakness · Management has identified a material weakness involving the Company’s controls over the existence of inventory at its subsidiary location in Singapore. | ||||||
| 2023-01-31 | 2023-05-01 | none stated | NOT effective | not extracted | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · From time to time, we are a party to legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. Item 9A · ICFR · Solely as a result of such material weakness, the Company’s executive officers determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective at the reasonable assurance level as of January 31, 2023. Item 9A · material weakness · Management has identified a material weakness involving the Company’s review controls over the review of significant technical accounting matters. | ||||||
| 2022-01-31 | 2022-04-29 | none stated | NOT effective | not extracted | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · From time to time, we are a party to legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. Item 9A · ICFR · Solely as a result of such material weakness, the Company’s executive officers determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective at the reasonable assurance level as of January 31, 2022. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our current disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of January 31, 2022,at the reasonable assurance level. Item 9A · material weakness · Notwithstanding the material weakness described above, the Company's management, including our principal executive officers and principal financial officer, have concluded that the financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K present fairly, in all material respects, the Company's financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.