Cash-flow figures use the latest fiscal year: this filer tags quarterly cash flows year-to-date only and the missing discrete quarters could not be derived (irregular fiscal quarters or a tagging change), so no four consecutive quarters exist to sum.
full derived coverage requires a plan
Output of a disclosed model — assumptions may be wrong. Research, not investment advice. See the Disclaimer.
— Months · distinct values (the real sample size).
Metric
Today
Own median
Own range
%ile
z
Sector med.
mo · distinct
P/E (FY)
—
P/E history suppressed for this name — pe: per-share basis changed ~2.0x since the reported FY (stock split) — P/E rebased to market cap ÷ net income. The historical pass re-bases per-share facts from the SEC split calendar and has no equivalent guard, so its multiples are on the stale basis; a band over them would be a wrong number.
1.7%
1.1%
no band (54 mo · 5 distinct)
—
—
4.1%
54 · 5
13.4%
13.6%
no band (29 mo · 4 distinct)
—
—
4.8%
29 · 4
16.5%
10.1%
no band (54 mo · 5 distinct)
—
—
1.6%
54 · 5
−9.0%
11.8%
17th
−0.88σ
2.4%
141 · 141
−69.2% (2026-02)
—
no band (23 mo · 2 distinct)
—
—
11.5%
23 · 2
43.7% (2026-02)
—
no band (23 mo · 2 distinct)
—
—
5.5%
23 · 2
Market Cap
$95.86M
not reconstructed — market cap was removed from the historical pass (never a ranking factor, and a reconstructed share count carries look-ahead risk). The single stored value is the forward-captured snapshot, not a series.
ROE (point-in-time)Information Technology median, same monthshaded = own p10–p90 · dashed = own median · right-edge tick = today
shown for reference only — the reconstructed distribution did not clear the band gate, so no rank is quoted.
Multiple-implied price ladder · Full
Filed earnings only.
No ladder — P/E history suppressed for this name — pe: per-share basis changed ~2.0x since the reported FY (stock split) — P/E rebased to market cap ÷ net income. The historical pass re-bases per-share facts from the SEC split calendar and has no equivalent guard, so its multiples are on the stale basis; a band over them would be a wrong number.
Ladder not drawn for this name — the reason is above.ⓘ
Not a forecast: each row re-prices today's filed earnings at a multiple this company itself once traded at. It abstains rather than guess on a loss year or a broken per-share basis.
Every month uses only what was filed by then, split-adjusted. Delisted names are absent and a trough year can throw one huge reading, so read the median, not the edges.
Percentile through time (point-in-time cohort)
Loading the monthly cohort placement…
▸Comp setname your own peers — pick a pool or add tickers
Covered pool$757.45B +13.8%/yr 2020→2025Concentration1,066 of 10,000fragmented · top 3 hold 43.9% · +458 pts since 2020LGL0.0% · rank 109 of 118 · −0.0pp over 5y· CV 1.44 · σ 0.0pp
Who holds the poolCY2025 · bars scaled to the largest member
Growth, restated as sharewhere each pace has to END UP, by 2030
Its own realised pace— No growth rate was supplied to restate.
The pace the price requires— The growth today's price requires (our reverse-DCF) is a Pro metric — the realized-pace runway above is free.
LGL share over time5 published years
Calendar year
2020
2021
2023
2024
2025
Share of covered pool
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
newer year pending · coverage: 118 of the 130 members that…
Share of covered industry revenue · n=118 in Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment · CY2025 pool · built 2026-08-22 not market shareⓘ
Covered filers only, not market share — private and uncovered companies are missing, so every share here reads high. Years are FX-converted and published only once most of the pool has filed.
