Coffee Holding Co Inc JVA US Equity
Coffee Holding Co Inc (Nasdaq: JVA), an SEC filer in Miscellaneous Food Preparations & Kindred Products, closed at $3.43, -0.9%, on 2026-08-28, with a market cap of $20M as of 2026-08-27, a trailing P/E of 13.8, a net margin of 1.5% and 3-year sales growth of 13.6%. Institutional ownership, earnings history and filed financials are on the tabs below.
Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-31 | 2026-01-28 | as filed | NOT effective | NOT effective | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · To the knowledge of our management team, there is no litigation currently pending or contemplated against us, any of our officers or directors in their capacity as such, or against any of our property. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment, our management has determined that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of October 31, 2025 and the periods covered under this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based upon that evaluation, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to the existence of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. | ||||||
| 2024-10-31 | 2025-01-31 | none stated | NOT effective | NOT effective | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · None. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment, our management has determined that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of October 31, 2024 and the periods covered under this Annual Report on Form 10-K due to the material weaknesses described below. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based upon that evaluation, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. | ||||||
| 2023-10-31 | 2024-02-09 | none stated | NOT effective | NOT effective | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment, our management has determined that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of October 31, 2023 and the periods covered under this Annual Report on Form 10-K due to the material weaknesses described below. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based upon that evaluation, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. | ||||||
| 2022-10-31 | 2023-03-29 | described here | NOT effective | NOT effective | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · The Company was named as a defendant in a putative class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (the “Court”) on or about December 21, 2020. The plaintiffs, Eileen Brodsky and Rhonda Diamond, purported to represent a class of individuals who purchased coffee products at Aldi, Inc. (“Aldi”), a supermarket chain, generally allege that Aldi sold private label coffee products manufactured by us and by Pan American Coffee Co., LLC (“Pan American”), which falsely described the number of cups of coffee that could be made from the amount of product purchased. Aldi and Pan American were also named as defendants in the action. The complaint asserted a variety of claims under New York and California consumer protection laws, and sought unspecified monetary damages, including disgorgement and restitution, as well as other forms of relief including class certification, declaratory and injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees, and interest. On September 28, 2021, the Court entered an order granting the Company’s motion to dismiss with prejudice (the “Dismissal Order”). In the Dismissal Order, the Court stated that no reasonable coffee drinker wou… Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment, our management has determined that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of October 31, 2022 and the periods covered under this Annual Report on Form 10-K due to the material weaknesses described below. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based upon that evaluation, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. | ||||||
| 2021-10-31 | 2022-01-31 | described here | NOT effective | not extracted | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We were named as a defendant in a putative class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (the “Court”) on or about December 21, 2020. The plaintiffs, Eileen Brodsky and Rhonda Diamond, purporting to represent a class of individuals who purchased coffee products at one of our supermarket customers, generally allege that such client sold private label coffee products manufactured by us and one of our partners, which falsely described the number of cups of coffee that could be made from the amount of product purchased. These parties are also named as defendants in the action. The complaint asserts a variety of claims under New York and California consumer protection laws, and seeks unspecified monetary damages, including disgorgement and restitution, as well as other forms of relief including class certification, declaratory and injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees, and interest. We believe the allegations in the complaint are wholly without merit and that the claims asserted are legally deficient, and the company intends to vigorously defend the action. On September 28, 2021, the Court entered an order granting our motion to dismis… Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment, our management has determined that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of October 31, 2021 and the periods covered under this Annual Report on Form 10-K due to the material weaknesses described below. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based upon that evaluation, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.