Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-27 | 2025-11-26 | none stated | not extracted | not extracted | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · The Company has no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party or of which any of their property is subject. Item 9A · ICFR · Management concluded that, as of September 28, 2024, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective. Item 9A · material weakness · Based on our assessment as of September 28, 2024, our management identified a material weakness related to ineffective information technology general controls (ITGCs), including certain controls over logical access and change management. | ||||||
| 2024-09-28 | 2024-11-26 | none stated | NOT effective | NOT effective | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · The Company has no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party or of which any of their property is subject. Item 9A · ICFR · Management has therefore concluded that, as of September 28, 2024, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as a result of a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as described below. | ||||||
| 2023-09-30 | 2023-11-28 | none stated | effective | not extracted | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · The Company has no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party or of which any of their property is subject. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on our assessment, our management believes that, as of September 30, 2023, our internal control over financial reporting is effective. | ||||||
| 2022-09-24 | 2022-11-22 | none stated | effective | not extracted | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · The Company has no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party or of which any of their property is subject. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on our assessment, our management believes that, as of September 24, 2022, our internal control over financial reporting is effective. | ||||||
| 2021-09-25 | 2021-11-23 | none stated | effective | not extracted | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · The Company has no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a party or of which any of their property is subject. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on our assessment, our management believes that, as of September 25, 2021, our internal control over financial reporting is effective. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.