Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-31 | 2026-03-31 | none stated | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · None. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of January 31, 2026. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of January 31, 2026, the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide such reasonable assurance. | ||||||
| 2025-02-01 | 2025-04-01 | described here | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · On December 19, 2024, the Paul Berger Revocable Trust, a purported stockholder of J.Jill, (“Plaintiff”) filed a putative class action and derivative complaint (“Complaint”) in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (“Court”), captioned The Paul Berger Revocable Trust v. Rahamim, et al., C.A. No. 2024-1318-JTL (Del. Ch.). The Complaint alleged that certain members of the Company’s board of directors breached their fiduciary duties in connection with approving a stock repurchase program in December 2024 that authorized the use of up to $25 million to repurchase J.Jill stock. The Complaint also asserted a claim against TowerBrook Capital Partners L.P. (“TowerBrook”) for aiding and abetting the individual defendants’ alleged breaches of fiduciary duty. Plaintiff alleged that the repurchase program could have transferred majority voting control of J.Jill to TowerBrook. The individual defendants and TowerBrook believe that the allegations of the Complaint were meritless, denied and continue to deny those allegations, and deny that any violation of applicable law has occurred. However, solely to minimize expenses and distraction and to avoid the uncertainty of any litigation, on F… Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of February 1, 2025. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of February 1, 2025, the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide such reasonable assurance. | ||||||
| 2024-02-03 | 2024-04-04 | described here | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are not presently party to any legal proceedings the resolution of which we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results or cash flows. We establish reserves for specific legal matters when we determine that the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is probable and the loss is reasonably estimable. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of February 3, 2024. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of February 3, 2024, the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide such reasonable assurance. | ||||||
| 2023-01-28 | 2023-03-30 | described here | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are not presently party to any legal proceedings the resolution of which we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results or cash flows. We establish reserves for specific legal matters when we determine that the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is probable and the loss is reasonably estimable. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of January 28, 2023. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of January 28, 2023, the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide such reasonable assurance. | ||||||
| 2022-01-29 | 2022-04-13 | described here | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are not presently party to any legal proceedings the resolution of which we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results or cash flows. We establish reserves for specific legal matters when we determine that the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is probable and the loss is reasonably estimable. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that the company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of January 29, 2022. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of January 29, 2022, the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form-10-K, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide such reasonable assurance. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.