Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-25 | 2026-08-19 | in the notes | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are a party to various lawsuits, proceedings and other matters arising out of the conduct of our business. Currently, it is management’s opinion that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition, results of operation or cash flows. For a discussion of legal proceedings, investigations, settlements and other contingencies, see Note 9 — “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 25, 2026. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of June 25, 2026, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and is accumulated and reported to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. | ||||||
| 2025-06-26 | 2025-08-20 | in the notes | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are a party to various lawsuits, proceedings and other matters arising out of the conduct of our business. Currently, it is management’s opinion that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition, results of operation or cash flows. For a discussion of legal proceedings, investigations, settlements and other contingencies, see Note 10 — “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 26, 2025. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of June 26, 2025, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and is accumulated and reported to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. | ||||||
| 2024-06-27 | 2024-08-21 | in the notes | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are a party to various lawsuits, proceedings and other matters arising out of the conduct of our business. Currently, it is management’s opinion that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition, results of operation or cash flows. For a discussion of legal proceedings, investigations, settlements and other contingencies, see Note 10 — “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 27, 2024. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of June 27, 2024, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and is accumulated and reported to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. | ||||||
| 2023-06-29 | 2023-08-23 | in the notes | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are a party to various lawsuits, proceedings and other matters arising out of the conduct of our business. Currently, it is management’s opinion that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition, results of operation or cash flows. For a discussion of legal proceedings, investigations, settlements and other contingencies, see Note 10 — “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 29, 2023. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of June 29, 2023, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and is accumulated and reported to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. | ||||||
| 2022-06-30 | 2022-08-24 | in the notes | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are a party to various lawsuits, proceedings and other matters arising out of the conduct of our business. Currently, it is management’s opinion that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition, results of operation or cash flows. For a discussion of legal proceedings, investigations, settlements and other contingencies, see Note 9 — “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2022. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of June 30, 2022, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and is accumulated and reported to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.