Imperial Oil Ltd IMO US Equity
Imperial Oil Ltd (NYSE: IMO), an SEC filer in Petroleum Refining, closed at $130.51, -1.3%, on 2026-08-28, with a market cap of $63.9B as of 2026-08-27. Institutional ownership, earnings history and filed financials are on the tabs below.
Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-31 | 2026-02-18 | in the notes | not extracted | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · Refer to the relevant portions of note 9. "Litigation and other contingencies" of the "Financial section" of this report for additional information on legal proceedings. Imperial has elected to use a US $1 million threshold for disclosing environmental proceedings. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, these officers have concluded that the company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to them in a manner that allows for timely decisions regarding required disclosures and are effective in ensuring that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. | ||||||
| 2024-12-31 | 2025-02-19 | in the notes | not extracted | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · Refer to the relevant portions of note 9. "Litigation and other contingencies" of the "Financial section" of this report for additional information on legal proceedings. Imperial has elected to use a US $1 million threshold for disclosing environmental proceedings. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, these officers have concluded that the company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to them in a manner that allows for timely decisions regarding required disclosures and are effective in ensuring that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. | ||||||
| 2023-12-31 | 2024-02-28 | in the notes | not extracted | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · Refer to the relevant portions of note 9. "Litigation and other contingencies" of the "Financial section" of this report for additional information on legal proceedings. Imperial has elected to use a US $1 million threshold for disclosing environmental proceedings. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, these officers have concluded that the company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to them in a manner that allows for timely decisions regarding required disclosures and are effective in ensuring that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. | ||||||
| 2022-12-31 | 2023-02-22 | in the notes | not extracted | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · Refer to the relevant portions of note 9. "Litigation and other contingencies" of the “Financial section” of this report for additional information on legal proceedings. Imperial has elected to use a US $1 million threshold for disclosing environmental proceedings. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, these officers have concluded that the company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to them in a manner that allows for timely decisions regarding required disclosures and are effective in ensuring that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. | ||||||
| 2021-12-31 | 2022-02-23 | described here | not extracted | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · On October 8, 2021, Imperial was charged by the Ontario Crown in the Ontario Court of Justice with committing the offences, at Imperial’s refinery in Nanticoke, Ontario, of: (a) discharging or causing or permitting the discharge of a petroleum product into a watercourse contrary to section 30(1) of the Ontario Water Resources Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O. 40, as amended (the “OWRA”); (b) failing to forthwith notify the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks of the discharge contrary to section 30(2) of the OWRA; and (c) discharging or causing or permitting the discharge of a petroleum product into the natural environment contrary to section 14(1) of the Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.19, as amended. These offences were alleged to have occurred between May 31, 2019 and June 3, 2019. No determination of impact can be made at this time. Refer to the relevant portions of note 9. Litigation and other contingencies of the “Financial section” of this report for additional information on legal proceedings. Imperial has elected to use a $1 million threshold for disclosing environmental proceedings. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, these officers have concluded that the company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to them in a manner that allows for timely decisions regarding required disclosures and are effective in ensuring that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.