Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-31 | 2026-03-16 | described here | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · The Company’s current contract with DLA expires in July 2026. In October 2025, the DLA awarded a new five-year contract with a five-year renewal option to the Company (the “2025 DLA Contract”). Following issuance of the new contract, a competitor filed a bid protest at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, challenging the DLA’s evaluation of proposals and the contract award to the Company. As the recipient of the 2025 DLA Contract, the Company is a party to the bid protest. In response, the DLA is reviewing its evaluation to determine whether corrective action is necessary and has rescinded the 2025 DLA Contract award during this process. While the bid protest and corrective action is pending, the Company will continue providing logistics support under its existing contract which runs through July 2026. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on our assessment, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer believe that, as of December 31, 2025, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective and provided reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. | ||||||
| 2024-12-31 | 2025-03-12 | none stated | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · None. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on our assessment, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer believe that, as of December 31, 2024, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective and provided reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. | ||||||
| 2023-12-31 | 2024-03-14 | none stated | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · None. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on our assessment, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer believe that, as of December 31, 2023, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective and provided reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. | ||||||
| 2022-12-31 | 2023-03-14 | none stated | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · None. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on our assessment, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer believe that, as of December 31, 2022, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective and provided reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. | ||||||
| 2021-12-31 | 2022-03-24 | none stated | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · None. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on our assessment, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer believe that, as of December 31, 2021, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective and provided reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.