Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-31 | 2026-03-24 | in the notes | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · The matters included in Part II, Item 8, Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 16, "Commitments and Contingencies - Legal Proceedings" included in this Form 10-K are incorporated by reference. Item 9A · ICFR · Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as of January 31, 2026, based on the Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, known as "COSO." Based on such evaluation, the Company’s management concluded that as of January 31, 2026, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective at a reasonable assurance level. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level. | ||||||
| 2025-02-01 | 2025-03-25 | in the notes | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · The matters included in Part II, Item 8, Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 15, "Commitments and Contingencies - Legal Proceedings" included in this Form 10-K are incorporated by reference. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on such evaluation, the Company’s management concluded that as of February 1, 2025, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective at a reasonable assurance level. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level. | ||||||
| 2024-02-03 | 2024-03-26 | in the notes | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · The matters included in Part II, Item 8, Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 16, "Commitments and Contingencies - Legal Proceedings" included in this Form 10-K are incorporated by reference. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on such evaluation, the Company’s management concluded that as of February 3, 2024, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective at a reasonable assurance level. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level. | ||||||
| 2023-01-28 | 2023-03-28 | in the notes | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · The matters included in Part II, Item 8, Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 16, "Commitments and Contingencies - Legal Proceedings" included in this Form 10-K are incorporated by reference. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on such evaluation, the Company’s management concluded that as of January 28, 2023, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective at a reasonable assurance level. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level. | ||||||
| 2022-01-29 | 2022-03-17 | in the notes | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · The matters included in Part II, Item 8, Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 16, "Commitments and Contingencies - Legal Proceedings" included in this Form 10-K are incorporated by reference. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on such evaluation, the Company’s management concluded that as of January 29, 2022, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective at a reasonable assurance level. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.