Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-31 | 2026-02-25 | in the notes | effective | not extracted | remediated (prior year) | EDGAR |
Item 3 · Please refer to Note 9—Commitments and Contingencies for discussion around our legal proceedings. Item 9A · ICFR · In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO. Item 9A · material weakness · As previously reported in Item 9A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, management identified a material weakness in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. | ||||||
| 2024-12-31 | 2025-02-26 | in the notes | NOT effective | NOT effective | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · Please refer to Note 10—Commitments and Contingencies for discussion around our legal proceedings. Item 9A · ICFR · In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness identified below on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of such date, due to the material weakness described below, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2024. | ||||||
| 2023-12-31 | 2024-02-22 | in the notes | effective | not extracted | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · Please refer to Note 10—Commitments and Contingencies for discussion around our legal proceedings. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on the results of its assessment, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2023. | ||||||
| 2022-12-31 | 2023-02-27 | in the notes | effective | not extracted | remediated (prior year) | EDGAR |
Item 3 · Please refer to Note 10—Commitments and Contingencies for discussion around our legal proceedings. Item 9A · ICFR · In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO. Item 9A · material weakness · As previously reported in Item 9A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, management identified material weaknesses in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. | ||||||
| 2021-12-31 | 2022-03-01 | in the notes | NOT effective | NOT effective | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · Please refer to Note 10—Commitments and Contingencies for discussion around our legal proceedings. Item 9A · ICFR · In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses identified below on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2021, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of such date, due to the material weaknesses described below, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2021. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.