Century Casinos Inc /Co/ CNTY US Equity
Century Casinos Inc /Co/ (Nasdaq: CNTY), an SEC filer in Hotels & Motels, closed at $1.27, +3.3%, on 2026-08-28, with a market cap of $35M as of 2026-08-27, a net margin of -10.7% and 3-year sales growth of 10.0%. Institutional ownership, earnings history and filed financials are on the tabs below.
Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-31 | 2026-03-18 | described here | NOT effective | NOT effective | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are not a party to any pending litigation that, in management’s opinion, could have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations except as disclosed in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this report. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment, our management believes that, as of December 31, 2025, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective based on those criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officers and principal financial officer have concluded that as of December 31, 2025, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to the material weakness described below. | ||||||
| 2024-12-31 | 2025-03-13 | described here | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are not a party to any pending litigation that, in management’s opinion, could have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations except as disclosed in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this report. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment, our management believes that, as of December 31, 2024, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officers and principal financial officer have concluded that as of December 31, 2024, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. | ||||||
| 2023-12-31 | 2024-03-14 | described here | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are not a party to any pending litigation that, in management’s opinion, could have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations except as disclosed in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this report. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment, our management believes that, as of December 31, 2023, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officers and principal financial officer have concluded that as of December 31, 2023, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. | ||||||
| 2022-12-31 | 2023-03-10 | described here | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are not a party to any pending litigation that, in management’s opinion, could have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations except as disclosed in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this report. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment, our management believes that, as of December 31, 2022, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officers and principal financial officer have concluded that as of December 31, 2022, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. | ||||||
| 2021-12-31 | 2022-03-08 | described here | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We are not a party to any pending litigation that, in management’s opinion, could have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations except as disclosed in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this report. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment, our management believes that, as of December 31, 2021, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officers and principal financial officer have concluded that as of December 31, 2021, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.