Cyberloq Technologies, Inc. CLOQ US Equity
Cyberloq Technologies, Inc. (OTC: CLOQ), an SEC filer in Services-Prepackaged Software, closed at $0.15, +8.1%, on 2026-08-28, with a market cap of $20M as of 2026-08-27. Institutional ownership, earnings history and filed financials are on the tabs below.
Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-31 | 2026-03-13 | described here | not extracted | NOT effective | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · The Company is not currently a party to any legal proceedings, nor is the Company a party to any administrative proceedings. In addition, the Company’s officers and directors have not been convicted in any criminal proceedings nor have they been permanently or temporarily enjoined, barred, suspended or otherwise limited from involvement in any type of securities or banking activities. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of such date to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. Item 9A · material weakness · Material weaknesses have previously been identified, including lack of segregation of duties and lack of formal written policies and procedures surrounding financial close and reporting. | ||||||
| 2024-12-31 | 2025-03-28 | described here | not extracted | NOT effective | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · The Company is not currently a party to any legal proceedings, nor is the Company a party to any administrative proceedings. On February 13, 2024, the Superior Court of New Jersey entered an order granting the request of Cyberloq Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) to dismiss the matter of Mark Carten v. Cyberloq Technologies, Inc. (UNN-L-3456-22). The litigation has now been dismissed without prejudice and is no longer pending. In addition, the Company’s officers and directors have not been convicted in any criminal proceedings nor have they been permanently or temporarily enjoined, barred, suspended or otherwise limited from involvement in any type of securities or banking activities. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of such date to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. Item 9A · material weakness · Material weaknesses have previously been identified, including lack of segregation of duties and lack of formal written policies and procedures surrounding financial close and reporting. | ||||||
| 2023-12-31 | 2024-03-29 | described here | not extracted | NOT effective | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · The Company is not currently a party to any legal proceedings, nor is the Company a party to any administrative proceedings. On February 13, 2024, the Superior Court of New Jersey entered an order granting the request of Cyberloq Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) to dismiss the matter of Mark Carten v. Cyberloq Technologies, Inc. (UNN-L-3456-22). The litigation has now been dismissed without prejudice and is no longer pending. In addition, the Company’s officers and directors have not been convicted in any criminal proceedings nor have they been permanently or temporarily enjoined, barred, suspended or otherwise limited from involvement in any type of securities or banking activities. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of such date to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. Item 9A · material weakness · Material weaknesses have previously been identified, including lack of segregation of duties and lack of formal written policies and procedures surrounding financial close and reporting. | ||||||
| 2022-12-31 | 2023-03-29 | described here | not extracted | NOT effective | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · The Company is currently a party to one legal proceeding pending in the Superior Court of New Jersey entitled Mark Carten v. Cyberloq Technologies, Inc. (UNN-L-3456-22). The Plaintiff is the Company’s former Chief Technology Officer, and the employee’ complaint alleges that the Company breached the February 28, 2022 separation and common stock redemption agreements, seeking an unspecified amount of monetary damages as well as a judgment of specific performance for the company to purchase the remaining shares of common stock owned by the employee. The Company believes that the employee’s claims have no merit and intends to defend itself vigorously. The Company is not currently a party to any other legal proceedings, nor is the Company a party to any administrative proceedings. In addition, the Company’s officers and directors have not been convicted in any criminal proceedings nor have they been permanently or temporarily enjoined, barred, suspended or otherwise limited from involvement in any type of securities or banking activities. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of such date to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. Item 9A · material weakness · Material weaknesses have previously been identified, including lack of segregation of duties and lack of formal written policies and procedures surrounding financial close and reporting. | ||||||
| 2021-12-31 | 2022-03-31 | described here | not extracted | NOT effective | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · The Company is not currently a party to any legal proceedings, nor is the Company a party to any administrative proceedings. In addition, the Company’s officers and directors have not been convicted in any criminal proceedings nor have they been permanently or temporarily enjoined, barred, suspended or otherwise limited from involvement in any type of securities or banking activities. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of such date to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. Item 9A · material weakness · Material weaknesses have previously been identified, including lack of segregation of duties and lack of formal written policies and procedures surrounding financial close and reporting. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.