Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-30 | 2025-11-25 | as filed | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · There are no pending legal proceedings against or involving the Company for which the outcome is likely to have a material adverse effect upon its financial position or results of operations. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on that evaluation, management concluded that, as of September 30, 2025, our internal control over financial reporting was effective. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective. | ||||||
| 2024-09-30 | 2024-11-15 | as filed | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · There are no pending legal proceedings against or involving the Company for which the outcome is likely to have a material adverse effect upon its financial position or results of operations. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on that evaluation, management concluded that, as of September 30, 2024, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on the COSO internal control criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective. | ||||||
| 2023-09-30 | 2023-11-29 | as filed | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · There are no pending legal proceedings against or involving the Company for which the outcome is likely to have a material adverse effect upon its financial position or results of operations. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on that evaluation, management concluded that, as of September 30, 2023, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on the COSO internal control criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective. | ||||||
| 2022-09-30 | 2022-11-23 | as filed | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · There are no pending legal proceedings against or involving the Company for which the outcome is likely to have a material adverse effect upon its financial position or results of operations. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on that evaluation, management concluded that, as of September 30, 2022, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on the COSO internal control criteria. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective. | ||||||
| 2021-09-30 | 2021-11-10 | as filed | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · There are no pending legal proceedings against or involving the Company for which the outcome is likely to have a material adverse effect upon its financial position or results of operations. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on that evaluation, management concluded that, as of September 30, 2021, our internal control over financial reporting was effective. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.