Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-31 | 2026-03-12 | described here | effective | effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · There are no actions, suits, proceedings, inquiries or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our Company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our Company, our Common Stock, any of our officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this assessment, management has determined that our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025 was effective. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2025, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level. | ||||||
| 2024-12-31 | 2025-03-13 | described here | not extracted | effective | remediated (prior year) | EDGAR |
Item 3 · There are no actions, suits, proceedings, inquiries or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our Company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our Company, our Common Stock, any of our officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2024, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level. Item 9A · material weakness · Previously Identified Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting We identified a material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting in prior years. | ||||||
| 2023-12-31 | 2024-03-20 | described here | not extracted | not extracted | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · There are no actions, suits, proceedings, inquiries or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our Common Stock, any of our officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect. Item 9A · material weakness · As required under Exchange Act Rule 13a-15, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (our principal executive and accounting officer) after evaluating the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. | ||||||
| 2022-12-31 | 2023-03-16 | described here | not extracted | not extracted | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · There are no actions, suits, proceedings, inquiries or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our Common Stock, any of our officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect. Item 9A · material weakness · As required under Exchange Act Rule 13a-15, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (our principal executive officer) and our Chief Financial Officer (our principal financial officer), after evaluating the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. | ||||||
| 2021-12-31 | 2022-03-24 | described here | not extracted | not extracted | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · There are no actions, suits, proceedings, inquiries or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our Common Stock, any of our officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect. Item 9A · material weakness · As required under Exchange Act Rule 13a-15, the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer (our principal executive officer) and our Chief Financial Officer (our principal financial officer), after evaluating the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.