Abundia Global Impact Group, Inc. AGIG US Equity
Abundia Global Impact Group, Inc. (NYSE: AGIG), an SEC filer in Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas, closed at $0.97, +2.1%, on 2026-08-27, with a market cap of $43M, a net margin of -7172.4% and 3-year sales growth of -37.0%. Institutional ownership, earnings history and filed financials are on the tabs below.
Legal & controls
Item 3 and Item 9A as filed · every verdict is the registrant’s own sentence, printed below it · a filing that fails an extraction gate reads “not extracted”
| Fiscal year | Filed | Item 3 | ICFR | disclosure controls | material weakness | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-31 | 2026-03-23 | as filed | not extracted | not extracted | disclosed | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We may from time to time be a party to lawsuits incidental to our business. As of March 20, 2026, we were not aware of any current, pending or threatened litigation or proceedings that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2025. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2025. Item 9A · material weakness · This conclusion reflects the presence of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, including deficiencies in the formal control environment and control activities, such as incomplete risk assessments relating to segregation of duties and the risk of material misstatement. | ||||||
| 2024-12-31 | 2025-02-24 | as filed | NOT effective | NOT effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We may from time to time be a party to lawsuits incidental to our business. As of February 20, 2025, we were not aware of any current, pending or threatened litigation or proceedings that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this evaluation under the COSO Framework, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2024. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2024. | ||||||
| 2023-12-31 | 2024-04-02 | as filed | NOT effective | NOT effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We may from time to time be a party to lawsuits incidental to our business. As of April 1, 2024, we were not aware of any current, pending or threatened litigation or proceedings that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this evaluation under the COSO Framework, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2023. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2023. | ||||||
| 2022-12-31 | 2023-03-31 | as filed | NOT effective | NOT effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We may from time to time be a party to lawsuits incidental to our business. As of March 29, 2023, we were not aware of any current, pending or threatened litigation or proceedings that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this evaluation under the COSO Framework, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2022. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2022. | ||||||
| 2021-12-31 | 2022-03-31 | as filed | NOT effective | NOT effective | none in Item 9A | EDGAR |
Item 3 · We may from time to time be a party to lawsuits incidental to our business. As of March 22, 2022, we were not aware of any current, pending or threatened litigation or proceedings that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. Item 9A · ICFR · Based on this evaluation under the COSO Framework, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2021. Item 9A · disclosure controls · Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2021. | ||||||
5 of 5 annual reports on record have their filing text cached on this host; the rest are listed with their EDGAR link and no extraction, because this surface never fetches from SEC on a page load.
- Item 3 and Item 9A are located in the filing HTML already cached on this host and read with the same line-anchored item matcher and largest-gap body disambiguation the filing-narrative pass uses for Item 1A and Item 7 — no fetch, no model, no summarization.
- A heading is accepted as a section only when it is not a table-of-contents row (a trailing page number), not a quoted reference in prose, and names its own section; the span must then clear a per-item length band and carry readable text after the heading. Anything that fails a gate is served as 'not extracted' with the reason — never as a default value.
- An effectiveness conclusion is read only from a sentence that names its own control set (disclosure controls and procedures, or internal control over financial reporting) and states an outcome. Conditional sentences — the standard limitations paragraph and forward-looking remediation language — are excluded, because they are hypotheses rather than conclusions.
- When a filing's own sentences disagree — an effective conclusion beside an unremediated material-weakness disclosure, or two conclusions of opposite sign — no verdict is asserted. A wrong 'controls were effective' reading is worse than no reading.
- Every verdict is shown beside the verbatim sentence it was read from. The excerpt is the filing's own words, capped at 1,200 characters; the filing itself is one link away.