Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

AB US Equity

Alliancebernstein Holding L.P.Financials · Investment Advice · CIK 825313 · FY ends Dec 31
$36.26
+0.24 (+0.67%)
USD · as of 2026-08-21 · marketstack

AB · 10-K · period ended 2025-12-31

← all AB documents
filed 2026-02-12 · EDGAR original ↗

Our rendering of the filing — original pagination and typography are not reproduced, and tables are reduced to their short label cells (the figures live on FA). Nothing is summarized: every line below is the filing's own text.

blocks 1600 of 2,724506k characters rendered

ab-20251231

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2025

OR

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 001-09818

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN HOLDING L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (615) 622-0000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class Trading Symbol Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant's executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).☐

The aggregate market value of the units representing assignments of beneficial ownership of limited partnership interests held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which such units were last sold on the New York Stock Exchange as of June 30, 2025 was approximately $4.5 billion.

The number of units representing assignments of beneficial ownership of limited partnership interests outstanding as of December 31, 2025 was 92,284,367. (This figure includes 100,000 general partnership units having economic interests equivalent to the economic interests of the units representing assignments of beneficial ownership of limited partnership interests.)

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

This Form 10-K does not incorporate any document by reference.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Glossary of Certain Defined Terms ii

Part I

Item 1. Business 1

Item 1A. Risk Factors 15

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 24

Item 1C. Cybersecurity 24

Item 2. Properties 25

Item 3. Legal Proceedings 25

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 25

Part II

Item 6. Reserved 28

Executive Overview 28

Market Environment 28

AB Holding 30

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 56

AB Holding 56

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 58

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 123

Item 9B. Other Information 124

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections 124

Part III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 125

Item 11. Executive Compensation 139

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services 170

Part IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules 171

Table of Contents

Glossary of Certain Defined Terms

AB Holding AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (Delaware limited partnership).

AB Units units of limited partnership interest in AB.

AUM AB's assets under management.

Exchange Act the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

ERISA the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

GAAP U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

Investment Advisers Act the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended.

Investment Company Act the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.

NYSE the New York Stock Exchange, Inc.

Partnerships AB and AB Holding together.

SEC the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

Securities Act the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

ii AllianceBernstein

Table of Contents

Part I

Item 1. Business

The words “we” and “our” in this Form 10-K refer collectively to AB Holding and AB and its subsidiaries, or to their officers and employees. Similarly, the words “company” and “firm” refer to both AB Holding and AB. Where the context requires distinguishing between AB Holding and AB, we identify which company is being discussed. Cross-references are in italics.

We use “global” in this Form 10-K to refer to all nations, including the United States; we use “international” or “non-U.S.” to refer to nations other than the United States.

We use “emerging markets” in this Form 10-K to refer to countries included in the Morgan Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) emerging markets index, which include, as of December 31, 2025: Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, Egypt, Greece, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand and Turkey.

Clients

We provide diversified investment management and related services globally to a broad range of clients through our three distribution channels: Institutions, Retail and Private Wealth Management. See “Distribution Channels” in this Item 1 for additional information.

As of December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, our AUM were approximately $867 billion, $792 billion and $725 billion, respectively, and our net revenues were approximately $4.5 billion, $4.5 billion and $4.2 billion, respectively.EQH (our parent company) and its subsidiaries, whose AUM consist primarily of fixed income investments, is our largest client. Our EQH affiliates represented approximately 16%, 17% and 16% of our AUM as of December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, and we earned approximately 4% of our net revenues from services we provided to them in each of 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Assets Under Management (AUM)($ billions) Net Revenues($ billions)

See “Distribution Channels” below and “Assets Under Management” and “Net Revenues” in Item 7 for additional information regarding our AUM and net revenues.

Generally, we are compensated for our investment services on the basis of investment advisory and services fees calculated as a percentage of AUM. For additional information about our investment advisory and services fees, including performance-based fees, see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A and “Net Revenues – Investment Advisory and Services Fees” in Item 7.

Research

Our high-quality, in-depth research is the foundation of our asset management and private wealth management businesses. We believe that our global team of research professionals, whose disciplines include economic, equity, fixed income and quantitative research, gives us a competitive advantage in achieving investment success for our clients. We also have experts focused on multi-asset strategies, wealth management, sustainability and impact strategies, and alternative investments.

Table of Contents

Part I

Purpose and Values

To AllianceBernstein, being a responsible firm means delivering better outcomes for our clients while upholding high ethical standards, building a strong culture, and promoting the future viability of our business.

Our purpose and values describe the employee behaviors and actions that support these goals, and we work diligently across our business to bring them to life.

Purpose — Pursue insight that unlocks opportunity.

Our Values:

•We invest in one another, meaning that we have a strong organizational culture where community and belonging is celebrated and mentorship is critical to our success.

•We strive for distinctive knowledge, meaning that we collaboratively identify creative solutions to clients' investment challenges through our expertise in a wide range of investment disciplines.

•We speak with courage and conviction, which informs how we engage with our AB colleagues, clients and other stakeholders.

•We act with integrity — always, which is the bedrock of our relationships and drives us to avoid activities that could create potential conflicts of interest or distract us from our singular focus to provide high value asset management to our clients.

We describe our firm's governance structure, including our Board and its committees, in Item 10 of this Form 10-K.

Investment Philosophy

We believe that strong long-term investment outcomes are achieved through disciplined portfolio construction, differentiated research, and active risk management across market environments. Our investment approach integrates fundamental and quantitative insights, rigorous valuation and risk frameworks, and active portfolio oversight to deliver a range of client objectives, including alpha generation, total return, income, diversification, and downside mitigation.

Our global research platform emphasizes depth of expertise, collaboration across asset classes, and continuous challenge of investment decisions. We focus not only on identifying attractive opportunities, but also on managing risk, liquidity, and concentration as integral components of portfolio construction in advancing clients’ investment objectives.

Our investment services include expertise in:

•Equities, including actively managed strategies across global and regional markets and capitalization ranges, spanning growth, value, core, defensive, thematic, and sustainable approaches, with varying degrees of active risk, concentration, and benchmark sensitivity;

•Fixed Income, including actively managed traditional and unconstrained strategies across taxable and tax-exempt markets, encompassing government, corporate, securitized, emerging market, and municipal securities, with a focus on income generation, risk management, liquidity, and diversification;

•Multi-Asset Solutions, including outcome-oriented and asset-allocation strategies such as target-date, target-risk, income, and total-return portfolios, as well as customized multi-asset solutions designed to meet specific client objectives;

•Hedge Fund Strategies, including fundamental and systematic hedge funds, equity market neutral, event-driven, macro, and fund-of-funds strategies, focused on delivering diversified, idiosyncratic return streams with controlled market exposure;

•Private Alternatives, including private credit, asset-based finance, real assets, real estate debt, and specialty finance strategies, where returns are driven by underwriting discipline, structure, selectivity, and active portfolio management rather than public market beta; and

•Systematic Strategies, including alpha-seeking and risk-controlled approaches that apply quantitative research, data-driven signals, and disciplined portfolio construction across equity and fixed income markets, as well as passive index, ESG index, and enhanced index solutions designed to provide efficient market exposure.

2 AllianceBernstein

Table of Contents

Part I

Our AUM by client domicile and investment service as of December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 are as follows:

AUM by Client Domicile($ in billions) AUM by Investment Service($ in billions)

Distribution Channels

Institutions

We offer to our institutional clients, which include private and public pension plans, foundations and endowments, insurance companies, central banks and governments worldwide, and EQH and its subsidiaries, separately managed accounts, sub-advisory relationships, structured products, collective investment trusts, mutual funds, hedge funds and other investment vehicles (“Institutional Services”).

We manage the assets of our institutional clients pursuant to written investment management agreements or other arrangements, which generally are terminable at any time or upon relatively short notice by either party. In general, our written investment management agreements may not be assigned without the client's consent. For information about our institutional investment advisory and services fees, including performance-based fees, see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A and “Net Revenues – Investment Advisory and Services Fees” in Item 7.

EQH and its subsidiaries constitute our largest institutional client. EQH and its subsidiaries combined AUM accounted for approximately 26%, 27% and 25% of our institutional AUM as of December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and approximately 26%, 22% and 22% of our institutional revenues for 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. No single institutional client other than EQH and its respective subsidiaries accounted for more than approximately 1% of our net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2025.

Table of Contents

Part I

As of December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, Institutional Services represented approximately 41%, 41% and 44%, respectively, of our AUM, and the fees we earned from providing these services represented approximately 15%, 16% and 16% of our net revenues for each of those years, respectively. Our AUM and revenues are as follows:

Institutional Services Assets Under Management(by Investment Service)

Years Ended December 31 % Change

(in millions)

Equity:

Fixed Income:

Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions(2):

Total:

(1)Includes index and enhanced index services.

(2)Includes certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity or fixed income services.

4 AllianceBernstein

Table of Contents

Part I

Revenues from Institutional Services(by Investment Service)

Years Ended December 31 % Change

(in thousands)

Equity:

Fixed Income:

Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions(3):

Total Investment Advisory and Services Fees:

(1)Includes index and enhanced index services.

(2)Fixed Income Servicing includes advisory-related services fees that are not based on AUM, including derivative transaction fees and other fixed income advisory services.

(3)Includes certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity or fixed income services.

Table of Contents

Part I

Retail

We provide investment management and related services to a wide variety of individual retail investors globally through retail mutual funds we sponsor, mutual fund sub-advisory relationships, separately-managed account programs (see below), and other investment vehicles (“Retail Products and Services”).

We distribute our Retail Products and Services through financial intermediaries, including broker-dealers, insurance sales representatives, banks, registered investment advisers and financial planners. These products and services include open-end and closed-end funds that are either (i) registered as investment companies under the Investment Company Act (“U.S. Funds”), or (ii) not registered under the Investment Company Act and generally not offered to U.S. persons (“Non-U.S. Funds” and collectively with the U.S. Funds, “AB Funds”). They also include separately-managed account programs, which are sponsored by financial intermediaries and generally charge an all-inclusive fee covering investment management, trade execution, asset allocation, and custodial and administrative services. In addition, we provide distribution, shareholder servicing, transfer agency services and administrative services for our Retail Products and Services. See “Net Revenues – Investment Advisory and Services Fees” in Item 7 for information about our retail investment advisory and services fees. See Note 2 to AB’s consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for a discussion of the commissions we pay to financial intermediaries in connection with the sale of open-end AB Funds.

Fees paid by the U.S. Funds are reflected in the applicable investment management agreement, which generally must be approved annually by the board of directors or trustees of those funds, by a majority vote of the independent directors or trustees. Increases in these fees must be approved by fund shareholders; decreases need not be, including any decreases implemented by a fund’s directors or trustees. In general, each investment management agreement with the U.S. Funds provides for termination by either party, at any time, upon 60 days’ notice.

Fees paid by Non-U.S. Funds are reflected in management agreements that continue until they are terminated. Increases in these fees generally must be approved by the relevant regulatory authority, depending on the domicile and structure of the fund, and Non-U.S. Fund shareholders must be given advance notice of any fee increases.

The mutual funds we sub-advise for a subsidiary of EQH constitute our largest retail clients. These assets accounted for approximately 13%, 13% and 14% of our retail AUM as of December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and approximately 1% of our retail net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023.

Most open-end U.S. Funds have adopted a plan under Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act that allows the fund to pay, out of assets of the fund, distribution and service fees, for the distribution and sale of its shares. The open-end U.S. Funds have entered into such agreements with us, and we have entered into selling and distribution agreements pursuant to which we pay sales commissions to the financial intermediaries that distribute our open-end U.S. Funds. These agreements are terminable by either party upon notice (generally 30 days) and do not obligate the financial intermediary to sell any specific amount of fund shares.

As of December 31, 2025, retail U.S. Fund AUM was approximately $75 billion, or 21% of retail AUM, as compared to $74 billion, or 22%, as of December 31, 2024, and $66 billion, or 23%, as of December 31, 2023. Retail non-U.S. Fund AUM, as of December 31, 2025, totaled $131 billion, or 37% of retail AUM, as compared to $127 billion, or 38%, as of December 31, 2024, and $107 billion, or 37%, as of December 31, 2023.

6 AllianceBernstein

Table of Contents

Part I

Our Retail Services represented approximately 41%, 42% and 39% of our AUM as of December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and the fees we earned from providing these services represented approximately 55%, 52% and 46% of our net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Our AUM and revenues are as follows:

Retail Services Assets Under Management(by Investment Service)

Years Ended December 31 % Change

(in millions)

Equity:

Fixed Income:

Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions(2):

Total:

(1)Includes index and enhanced index services.

(2)Includes certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity or fixed income services

Table of Contents

Part I

Revenues from Retail Services(by Investment Service)

Years Ended December 31 % Change

(in thousands)

Equity:

Fixed Income:

Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions(2):

Total Investment Advisory and Services Fees:

Consolidated company-sponsored investment funds 484 486 836 (0.4) (41.9)

(1)Includes index and enhanced index services.

(2)Includes certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity or fixed income services.

8 AllianceBernstein

Table of Contents

Part I

Private Wealth Management

We partner with our clients, embracing innovation and research to address increasingly complex challenges. Our clients include high-net-worth individuals and families who have created generational wealth as successful business owners, athletes, entertainers, corporate executives and private practice owners. We also provide investment and wealth advice to foundations and endowments, family offices and other entities. Our flexible and extensive investment platform offers a range of solutions, including separately-managed accounts, hedge funds, mutual funds and other investment vehicles, tailored to meet each distinct client's needs. Our investment platform is complemented with a wealth platform that includes complex tax and estate planning, pre-IPO and pre-transaction planning, multi-generational family engagement, and philanthropic advice in addition to tailored approaches to meeting the unique needs of emerging wealth and multi-cultural demographics ("Private Wealth Services").

We manage accounts pursuant to written investment advisory agreements, which generally are terminable at any time or upon relatively short notice by any authorized party, and may not be assigned without the client's consent. For information about our investment advisory and services fees, including performance-based fees, see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A and “Net Revenues – Investment Advisory and Services Fees” in Item 7.

Our Private Wealth Services represented approximately 18%, 17% and 17% of our AUM as of December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The fees we earned from providing these services represented approximately 28%, 28% and 25% of our net revenues for 2025, 2024 and 2023. Our AUM and revenues are as follows:

Private Wealth Services Assets Under Management(by Investment Service)

Years Ended December 31 % Change

(in millions)

Equity:

Fixed Income:

Fixed Income Passively Managed(1) — — 2 n/m (100.0)

Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions(2):

Total:

(1)Includes index and enhanced index services.

(2)Includes certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity or fixed income services.

Table of Contents

Part I

Revenues from Private Wealth Services(by Investment Service)

Years Ended December 31 % Change

(in thousands)

Equity:

Fixed Income:

Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions(2):

Total Investment Advisory and Services Fees:

(1)Includes index and enhanced index services.

(2)Includes certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity or fixed income services.

10 AllianceBernstein

Table of Contents

Part I

Bernstein Research Services

On April 1, 2024, AB and Societe Generale ("SocGen") completed their previously announced transaction forming a global joint venture with two joint venture holding companies, one outside of North America ("ROW JV") and one within North America ("NA JV", and together the "JVs"). As of December 31, 2025, AB owned a majority interest in the NA JV while SocGen owned a majority interest in the ROW JV. AB deconsolidated the Bernstein Research Services business ("Bernstein Research Services" or "BRS") and retained the Bernstein Private Wealth Management business within its existing U.S. broker dealer Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., LLC.

On January 1, 2026, AB entered into an Amended and Restated Shareholder agreement with SocGen (the "Amendment Agreement") and exercised our option to deliver a 17.7% interest in the NA JV to SocGen resulting in AB owning a 49% interest in the NA JV. Subsequent to the Amendment Agreement, on January 1, 2026, AB and SocGen contributed their respective interests in the NA JV for an equal interest in ROW JV resulting in a single joint venture (the "AB/SG JV"). AB now owns a 49% interest in the AB/SG JV and SocGen owns a 51% majority interest. SeeNote 24 Divestitures to AB's consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for further discussion.

Prior to the deconsolidation of the BRS business, we earned revenues for providing investment research to, and executing brokerage transactions for, institutional clients. These clients compensated us principally by directing us to execute brokerage transactions on their behalf, for which we earned commissions, and to a lesser extent, by paying us directly for research through commission sharing agreements or cash payments. Bernstein Research Services accounted for approximately zero, 2% and 9% of our net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

For information regarding trends in fee rates charged for brokerage transactions, see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A.

Our Bernstein Research Services revenues are as follows:

Revenues from Bernstein Research Services

Years Ended December 31 % Change

(in thousands)

Custody

Our U.S. based broker-dealer subsidiary acts as custodian for substantially all of our Private Wealth Management AUM and some of our Institutional AUM. Other custodian arrangements, directed by clients, or where clients authorize or instruct us to appoint a custodian on their behalf, include banks, trust companies, brokerage firms and other financial institutions.

People Management

As a leading global investment management firm, we bring together a wide range of insights, expertise, and innovation to advance the interests of our clients around the world. The intellectual capital and distinctive knowledge of our employees are collectively the most important assets of our firm, so the long-term sustainability and success of our firm is heavily dependent on our people. Our People team plays a central role in supporting our employees and advancing their work experience. We are keenly focused on fostering a culture of meritocracy; encouraging innovation; sourcing, developing, and retaining top performing talent; and consistently aligning employees’ incentives and risk taking with those of the firm.

As a result, we have a robust firm culture that helps us to elevate performance and drive excellence. Further, our firm’s role as a fiduciary is embedded in our culture and our day-to-day practices. As a fiduciary, our firm’s primary objective is to act in our clients' best interests and help them reach their financial goals.

Also, our Board of Directors (the "Board") and committees of the Board, particularly our Compensation and Workplace Practices Committee, provide oversight into various matters affecting our people, including emerging people management risks and strategies to mitigate our exposure to those risks. These collaborative efforts contribute to the overall framework that guides how AB oversees a workforce that supports our values and drives our strategic initiatives.

Table of Contents

Part I

Talent Acquisition and Development

AB seeks to excel as an organization, in investment performance, client service, and being defined as an employer of choice. Across our global offices, we recruit and hire a workforce with diverse perspectives, backgrounds, and experiences. Our talent acquisition strategy helps us serve both our clients and our workforce, hand in hand, at an optimal level. We engage external organizations, including search firms and partnerships to assist in attracting and recruiting top talent at all levels. We also leverage technology tools to source and evaluate candidates against our needs and we continue to prioritize attracting the best talent throughout our search activities. Outside of traditional recruiting, we believe investing in emerging talent is key to our future planning. Both our internship and associate programs serve as robust pipelines for future leadership. The talent acquisition process is our firm’s first impression to future employees, and we strive to provide all candidates with a unique and compelling experience. We continue to enhance the firm’s recruiting efforts to include talent with a nontraditional path to financial services has been a focus area this year. We recognize that traditional recruitment efforts may not always provide access to the full range of top talent available in the marketplace. Therefore, we remain committed to implementing a recruiting strategy that is broad and includes partnering with community organizations, exploring alternative education and training programs, while more effectively leveraging the networks of our existing top performing talent leading to a valuable expansion of the pool of qualified applicants available to the firm.

We focus heavily on high candidate engagement, an efficient offer process and sound onboarding to support success. Learning and continued development are central to our talent strategy. In addition to an established culture of mentoring, we leverage technology to develop and deploy relevant coursework. Internal mobility is championed throughout the firm and progressing assignments of responsibility offer employees career growth and new opportunities. We remain highly committed to a culture of meritocracy and employee development, and believe that top performers expect and deserve this ongoing investment.

Employee Engagement and Fostering an Inclusive Culture

We believe a workforce is most engaged when employees feel connected to our culture. We seek to create a workplace where our people recognize the high importance of the work they do and enjoy the environment where the work gets done. By creating a culture of both high performance and accountability, we see employees thrive and contribute at their highest levels. It is important that our employees are not only connected to our business but also to the communities in which we operate. We offer many opportunities to volunteer, including our firm-wide philanthropic initiative, AB Gives Back. We prioritize the well-being of our staff through our global wellness programming, employee wellness groups, and our hybrid work schedule. Measuring engagement is key to understanding the views and perspectives of the organization. We utilize AB Voice, a periodic engagement survey designed to measure employee sentiment, to identify and address gaps that could impact productivity and retention.

AB is committed to promoting an inclusive workplace because we believe it has had a positive impact on our people, clients, and communities. In 2025, the workplace continued to undergo changes driven by various factors including rapid technological advances, evolving employee expectations, nuanced global needs and broader societal shifts. We have navigated the current dynamic environment by fostering a culture of continuous learning with a focus on employee engagement, exploring nontraditional recruiting sources, and locally driven inclusion initiatives.

We have prioritized initiatives and events that allow for learning, employee development and healthy discourse to cultivate an environment centered on inclusion. Our Employee Resource Groups hosted over 70 events which aimed to not only foster an inclusive work environment, but also contribute to business opportunities and the professional development of employees worldwide. Additionally, we leveraged data from our annual engagement survey to inform our decision-making process and gain a deeper understanding of the ever-changing needs of our diverse workforce across the globe.

Compensation and Benefits

We recognize the role that a competitive total reward offering plays in attracting and retaining top talent. Our pay practices include base salaries, annual cash bonuses, and, for employees with total compensation over $300,000 annually, a long-term incentive compensation award. These awards are generally denominated in restricted AB Holding Units. We utilize this structure with intentionality to foster a stronger sense of ownership by employees, aligning their interests with the interests of our Unitholders and our clients. We are a meritocracy and pay for performance under the auspices of providing compensation that is competitive and consistent with employee positions, skill levels, performance, experience, knowledge, and geographic location. Annually, we engage a compensation consulting firm to independently evaluate the accuracy of our executive compensation and to provide benchmarking against our industry peers. We also use these insights to make pay decisions for the broader organization. Periodically, we engage outside counsel to conduct privileged pay equity reviews. Pay is evaluated on an annual basis, with the firm providing merit-based and cost of living annual base salary increases, as well as incentive compensation. This information is communicated to employees at year-end. On occasion, pay is adjusted off-cycle due to internal transfer and/or promotion. Based on unique geographies, the firm makes benefits available to all eligible employees, including health insurance, paid and unpaid leaves, a self-directed retirement plan, and life and disability/accident coverage. We also offer a variety of voluntary benefits, ranging from adoption and surrogacy assistance to tuition reimbursement, which allows employees to select the offerings that meet their individual needs.

12 AllianceBernstein

Table of Contents

Part I

Employees

As of December 31, 2025, our firm had 4,468 full-time employees as compared to 4,341 employees as of December 31, 2024.

Information about our Executive Officers

Please refer to "Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance" below for information relating to our firm's executive officers.

Service Marks

We have registered a number of service marks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and various foreign trademark offices, including the mark “AllianceBernstein.” The logo set forth below is a service mark of AB:

In 2015, we established a new brand identity by prominently incorporating “AB” into our brand architecture, while maintaining the legal names of our corporate entities. With this and other related refinements, our company and each of its subsidiaries, including our Institutional and Retail businesses, are referred to as “AllianceBernstein (AB)” or simply “AB.” Private Wealth Management is referred to as “AB Bernstein.”

Service marks are generally valid and may be renewed indefinitely, as long as they are in use and/or their registrations are properly maintained.

Regulation

Virtually all aspects of our business are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations, rules of various securities regulators and exchanges, and laws in the foreign countries in which our subsidiaries conduct business. These laws and regulations primarily are intended to protect clients and fund shareholders and generally grant supervisory agencies broad administrative powers, including the power to limit or restrict the carrying on of business for failure to comply with such laws and regulations. Possible sanctions that may be imposed on us include the suspension of individual employees, limitations on engaging in business for specific periods, the revocation of the registration as an investment adviser or broker-dealer, censures and fines.

AB, AB Holding, the General Partner and five of our subsidiaries (Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., LLC (“SCB LLC”), AB Broadly Syndicated Loan Manager LLC, AB Custom Alternative Solutions LLC ("AB CAS"), AB Private Credit Investors LLC, and AB CarVal Investors, L.P.) are registered with the SEC as investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act. Additionally, AB Holding is an NYSE-listed company and, accordingly, is subject to applicable regulations promulgated by the NYSE. Also, AB, SCB LLC and AB CAS are registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”). AB is registered with the CFTC as a commodity pool operator ("CPO") and commodity trading adviser ("CTA"); SCB LLC is registered with the CFTC as a CPO, CTA, and commodities introducing broker; and AB CAS is registered with the CFTC as a CPO.

Each U.S. Fund is registered with the SEC under the Investment Company Act and each Non-U.S. Fund is subject to the laws in the jurisdiction in which the fund is registered. For example, our platform of Luxembourg-based funds operates pursuant to Luxembourg laws and regulations, including Undertakings for the Collective Investment in Transferable Securities Directives, and is authorized and supervised by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (“CSSF”), the primary regulator in Luxembourg. AllianceBernstein Investor Services, Inc., one of our subsidiaries, is registered with the SEC as a transfer and servicing agent.

SCB LLC and another of our subsidiaries, AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc., are registered with the SEC as broker-dealers, and both are members of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. AB Trust Company, LLC ("ABTC") is registered with the New Hampshire Banking Department as a state chartered trust bank. ABTC serves as the trustee for our collective investment trusts.

Table of Contents

Part I

Many of our subsidiaries are subject to the oversight of regulatory authorities in the jurisdictions outside the United States in which they operate, including the Ontario Securities Commission, the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada, the European Securities and Markets Authority, the Financial Conduct Authority in the U.K., the CSSF in Luxembourg, the Financial Services Agency in Japan, the Securities & Futures Commission in Hong Kong, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, the Financial Services Commission in South Korea, and the Financial Supervisory Commission in Taiwan. While these regulatory requirements often may be comparable to the requirements of the SEC and other U.S. regulators, they are sometimes more restrictive and may cause us to incur substantial expenditures of time and money related to our compliance efforts. For additional information relating to the regulations that impact our business, please refer to "Risk Factors" in Item 1A.

History and Structure

We have been in the investment research and management business for more than 50 years. Sanford C. Bernstein was founded in 1967. Alliance Capital was founded in 1971 when the investment management department of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc. (since November 2000, a part of Credit Suisse Group) merged with the investment advisory business of Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.

In April 1988, AB Holding “went public” as a master limited partnership. AB Holding Units, which trade under the ticker symbol “AB,” have been listed on the NYSE since that time.

In October 1999, AB Holding reorganized by transferring its business and assets to AB, a newly-formed operating partnership, in exchange for all of the AB Units (the “Reorganization”). Since the date of the Reorganization, AB has conducted the business formerly conducted by AB Holding and AB Holding’s activities have consisted of owning AB Units and engaging in related activities. Unlike AB Holding Units, AB Units do not trade publicly and are subject to significant restrictions on transfer. The General Partner is the general partner of both AB and AB Holding.

In October 2000, our two legacy firms, Alliance Capital and Sanford C. Bernstein, combined, bringing together Alliance Capital’s expertise in growth equity and corporate fixed income investing and its family of retail mutual funds, with Sanford C. Bernstein’s expertise in value equity investing, tax-exempt fixed income management, and Private Wealth Management.

As of December 31, 2025, the condensed ownership structure of AB is as follows (for a more complete description of our ownership structure, see “Principal Security Holders” in Item 12):

The General Partner owns 100,000 general partnership units in AB Holding and a 1.0% general partnership interest in AB. Including these general partnership interests, EQH, directly and through certain of its subsidiaries (see “Principal Security Holders” in Item 12), had an approximate 68.3% economic interest in AB as of December 31, 2025.

Competition

We compete in all aspects of our business with numerous investment management firms, mutual fund sponsors, brokerage and investment banking firms, insurance companies, banks and other financial institutions that often provide investment products with similar features and objectives as those we offer. Our competitors offer a wide range of financial services to the same customers that we seek to serve. Some of our competitors are larger, have a broader range of product choices and investment capabilities, conduct business in more markets, and have substantially greater resources than we do. These factors may place us at a competitive disadvantage, and we can give no assurance that our strategies and efforts to maintain and enhance our current client relationships, and create new ones, will be successful.

14 AllianceBernstein

Table of Contents

Part I

In addition, EQH and its subsidiaries provide financial services, some of which compete with those we offer. The AB Partnership Agreement specifically allows EQH and its subsidiaries (other than the General Partner) to compete with AB and to pursue opportunities that may be available to us. EQH and certain of its subsidiaries have substantially greater financial resources than we do and are not obligated to provide resources to us.

To grow our business, we believe we must be able to compete effectively for AUM. Key competitive factors include:

•our investment performance for clients;

•our commitment to place the interests of our clients first;

•the quality of our research;

•our ability to attract, motivate and retain highly skilled, and often highly specialized, personnel;

•the array of investment products we offer;

•the fees we charge;

•Morningstar/Lipper rankings for the AB Funds;

•our ability to sell our actively-managed investment services despite the fact that many investors favor passive services;

•our operational effectiveness;

•our ability to further develop and market our brand; and

•our global presence.

Competition is an important risk that our business faces and should be considered along with the other factors we discuss in “Risk Factors” in Item 1A.

Available Information

AB and AB Holding file or furnish annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, amendments to such reports, and other reports (and amendments thereto) required to comply with federal securities laws, including Section 16 beneficial ownership reports on Forms 3, 4 and 5, registration statements and proxy statements. We maintain an Internet site (http://www.alliancebernstein.com) where the public can view these reports, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after each report is filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Please consider this section along with the description of our business in Item 1, the competition section immediately above and AB’s financial information contained in Items 7 and 8. The majority of the risk factors discussed below directly affect AB. These risk factors also affect AB Holding because AB Holding’s principal source of income and cash flow is attributable to its investment in AB. See also “Cautions Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in Item 7.

Business-related Risks

Our revenues and results of operations depend on the market value and composition of our AUM, which can fluctuate significantly based on various factors, including many factors outside of our control.

We derive most of our revenues from investment advisory and services fees, typically calculated as a percentage of the value of AUM on a specified date or as an average over a billing period. These fees vary based on the type of service, account size, and total assets managed for a client. Several factors can adversely affect our AUM and composition, including:

•Market Factors: Our AUM remain sensitive to global financial market volatility, such as the inflationary pressures and interest rate increases in 2022 and 2023, followed by interest rate decreases and renewed inflationary concerns in 2024, and the imposition of trade tariffs in 2025. Continued global economic uncertainty may lead to market volatility, potentially reducing our revenues and net income. Interconnected global economies mean that instability in one region can impact others. Political, social, or economic instability, wars (e.g., Ukraine and the Middle East), terrorism, health crises (e.g., COVID-19), natural disasters, and other unforeseen events can significantly affect financial markets and our AUM, revenues, and net income. Market volatility and reduced margin financing availability can limit liquidity, making it difficult to sell certain securities at their true value. While liquidity was stable in 2025, future deterioration could adversely affect our AUM, revenues, and net income.

Table of Contents

Part I

•Geographic and Geopolitical Factors: Our clients and our AUM are geographically diverse as approximately 25% of our clients are domiciled outside the US (primarily Europe, Asia, and the Americas) and approximately 37% of our AUM by Investment Services are non-US. Local or regional events including political, social, or economic instability, wars (e.g., Ukraine and the Middle East), challenges to currently recognized international borders (such as those made by China toward Taiwan), terrorism, health crises (e.g., COVID-19), natural disasters, and other unforeseen events can significantly affect our clients’ demand for our services, local and regional financial markets, and our AUM, revenues, and net income. Specifically, our clients and the investment funds we manage in mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong, as well as any of our investment services with a regional investment focus in this geographic area, may be significantly impacted by a China/Taiwan conflict. The disputed status of Taiwan and the possibility of military conflict with China is a significant geopolitical risk that could materially impact our business in Taiwan.

•Client Preferences: Clients can withdraw their assets at any time with short notice. Shifts in market dynamics and investment trends, such as a move towards less risky investments by defined benefit plan sponsors and a shift to lower-fee passive services, may reduce interest in our investment products. Loss or decrease in AUM reduces our advisory and services fees and revenues.

•Our Investment Performance: Our success in achieving investment returns that match or exceed those of similar asset classes and competing services is crucial for retaining clients and attracting new ones. If our investment performance is poor, either in absolute terms or compared to peers and benchmarks, clients may redeem their assets, and potential clients might choose other investment firms.

•Investing Trends: The fees we charge for our various investment products and services can vary widely. Our overall fee income changes as clients move their assets between accounts or products with different fee structures. For more details on our fee rates, see “Net Revenues” in Item 7).

•Service Changes: We might need to lower our fees, change our fee structures, or adjust the services we offer due to factors like new regulations, advancements in asset management technology (such as algorithmic strategies and new financial technologies), court rulings, and competitive pressures. Lowering our fees would decrease our revenue.

•Interest Rate Changes: Changes in interest rates, especially rapid and significant increases, can negatively impact investor interest in and the value of our fixed income and multi-asset investment portfolios.

•The AI Trade: A significant change in AI adoption rates in the global economy and investments in the companies that provide the AI infrastructure could have a meaningful impact on US equity market returns.

A decrease in the value or amount of our AUM, an adverse mix shift in our AUM, or a reduction in our fee levels would negatively impact our investment advisory fees and revenues. Reduced revenues, without a corresponding decrease in expenses, would adversely affect our operating results.

The shift from actively managed investment services to passive services has negatively impacted our investment advisory and services fees, revenues and results of operations, and this trend may continue.

The competitive landscape has become tougher as active managers, who select individual securities, have generally underperformed compared to passive services, which follow market indices. This general underperformance has reduced the flows into actively managed funds, and increased the flows into passive strategies. Achieving organic growth through net inflows remains challenging for active managers like us and requires gaining market share from other active managers.

Our reputation could suffer if we are unable to deliver consistent, competitive investment performance.

Our business relies on the trust and confidence of our clients. Damage to our reputation, such as from poor or inconsistent investment performance, can significantly reduce our AUM and hinder our ability to maintain or grow our business.

EQH and its subsidiaries provide a significant amount of our AUM and fund a significant portion of our new product initiatives, and if our agreements with them terminate or they withdraw capital support it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and/or financial condition.

EQH, our parent company, and its subsidiaries are our largest client, representing about 16% of our AUM as of December 31, 2025, and contributing approximately 4% of our net revenues. Our investment management agreements with EQH can be terminated at any time or on short notice by either party, and EQH is not obligated to maintain any level of AUM with us. Termination of these agreements by EQH could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Our business is dependent on investment advisory agreements with clients, and selling and distribution agreements with various financial intermediaries and consultants, which generally are subject to termination or non-renewal on short notice.

We generate most of our revenue through written investment management agreements with institutional investors, mutual funds, private wealth clients, and selling and distribution agreements with financial intermediaries that distribute AB Funds, including our active ETFs. These agreements, including those with EQH and its subsidiaries, can generally be terminated at any time or with short notice by either party. The investment management agreements for U.S. Funds must be reviewed and

16 AllianceBernstein

Table of Contents

Part I

approved annually by the Funds’ boards of directors, most of whom are independent. There is no guarantee that these boards will approve the agreements each year or that they won't impose unfavorable terms. Additionally, investors in AB Funds can redeem their investments without notice. Termination or non-renewal of a significant number of these agreements, or a substantial increase in redemption rates, could negatively impact our operations and business prospects.

Similarly, our selling and distribution agreements with securities firms, brokers, banks, and other financial intermediaries can be terminated by either party with notice (usually 30 days) and do not require the intermediaries to sell a specific amount of fund shares. These intermediaries often offer competing investment products. Some institutional investors rely on consultants to choose investment advisers, and our services may not always be recommended by these consultants. This could lead to clients moving their assets to other advisers, resulting in significant net outflows.

Lastly, our Private Wealth Services depend on referrals from financial planners, registered investment advisers, and other professionals. We cannot be certain that we will continue to receive these referrals. Losing access to these referrals could adversely affect our operations and business prospects.

Performance-based fee arrangements with our clients may cause greater fluctuations in our net revenues.

We sometimes charge performance-based fees, which include a base advisory fee plus an additional fee based on investment results, either in absolute terms or relative to a benchmark. Some of these fees have a high-watermark provision, meaning if a client account underperforms, it must recover losses before we can earn future performance-based fees. Failure to meet performance targets means no performance-based fee for that period, and high-watermark provisions can impair future fee earnings.

We earn performance-based fees on 7.3%, 7.6% and 0.4% of the assets we manage for institutional clients, private wealth clients and retail clients, respectively (in total, 4.5% of our AUM). An increase in AUM subject to performance-based fees could lead to greater revenue and earnings volatility. Our performance-based fees were $185.3 million, $271.0 million and $144.9 million in 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

We may be unable to develop new products and services, and the development of new products and services may expose us to reputational harm, additional costs or operational risk.

Our financial performance relies on our ability to quickly adapt to changes in the asset management industry, meet evolving client needs, and develop, market, and manage new investment products and services. Creating new products, including those focused on specific industries, sectors, or criteria like ESG, requires continuous innovation, significant time, resources, and ongoing support.

Introducing new products and services involves substantial risks and uncertainties, such as establishing appropriate operational controls, adapting to shifting client and market preferences, facing competition, and complying with regulatory requirements. We cannot guarantee that we will successfully develop new products and services within the necessary timeframes. Failure to do so, or to manage the associated operational risks effectively, could damage our reputation, increase costs, and negatively impact our AUM, revenues, and operating income.

Fluctuations in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and various other currencies can adversely affect our AUM, revenues and results of operations.

Although much of our net revenues, expenses, and AUM are currently denominated in U.S. dollars, we have subsidiaries and clients outside the U.S. with different functional currencies. A weakening of these currencies relative to the U.S. dollar reduces the U.S. dollar value of our revenues and AUM denominated in those currencies. Consequently, fluctuations in U.S. dollar exchange rates impact our AUM, revenues, and reported financial results. Our efforts to hedge against these fluctuations may not be successful, potentially negatively affecting our revenues and financial results.

Our seed capital investments are subject to market risk. While we enter into various futures, forwards, swap and option contracts to economically hedge many of these investments, we also may be exposed to market risk and credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to these derivative instruments.

We have a seed investment program to build track records and support marketing for our new products. These investments are subject to market risk. Our risk management team oversees a seed hedging program to minimize this risk, considering practical and cost factors. However, not all seed investments are hedged, exposing us to market risk. Additionally, we may face basis risk, as we cannot always precisely hedge our market exposure, leading to potential relative spreads between market sectors. Consequently, capital market volatility can significantly impact our financial and operating results.

We use various derivative instruments, such as futures, forwards, swaps, and options, in our seed hedging program. While we hedge broad market risks, our hedges are imperfect, leaving some market risk. Furthermore, using derivatives introduces counterparty risk (the risk of credit-related losses if counterparties fail to perform), regulatory risk (e.g., short selling restrictions), and cash/synthetic basis risk (the risk that underlying positions do not move identically to related derivatives).

Table of Contents

Part I

We may engage in strategic transactions that could pose risks.

As part of our business strategy, we consider strategic transactions (such as our insurance sidecar transactions with Ruby Reinsurance Company and Fortitude Carlyle Asia Reinsurance, Ltd), including acquisitions (e.g., CarVal Investors in 2022), dispositions, mergers, consolidations, and joint ventures (e.g., our partnership with SocGen). These transactions may involve significant risks and challenges, including:

•adverse effects on our earnings if acquired intangible assets or goodwill become impaired;

•unknown liabilities or contingencies that arise post-closing;

•exposure to a new regulatory regime;

•potential disputes with counterparties; and

•increased leverage or dilution of existing Unitholders if transactions are funded with AB Units or AB Holding Units.

Acquisitions also pose the risk of losing customers or employees and underperforming relative to expectations. Additionally, losing investment personnel may result in losing expected AUM, adversely affecting our results of operations.

We carry non-controlling interests of joint ventures on our balance sheet that impact our financial performance.

Our business includes non-controlling interests in joint ventures, which pose several risks to our financial condition and results. As a non-controlling partner, we have limited influence over operations and strategic decisions, which may not align with our objectives. Each joint venture's actions could impact its profitability and our share of earnings. Financial difficulties or operational challenges may require us to impair the investment's value in our financial statements. Disputes with partners could lead to costly litigation or dissolution of the joint venture. These factors could reduce our investment returns and negatively impact our financial performance.

We are the guarantor of certain guarantees and credit lines of our consolidated and unconsolidated affiliates, over which we may have limited influence.

As guarantor for certain guarantees and credit lines of our subsidiaries, we face significant financial risks if any subsidiary experiences financial distress or defaults. In such cases, we may need to fulfill these commitments, which could affect our liquidity and financial condition.

We may not accurately value the securities we hold on behalf of our clients or our company investments.

In accordance with applicable regulatory requirements, contractual obligations or client direction, we have procedures for pricing and valuing securities and other positions in client accounts or company investments. Our Valuation Committee and sub-committees, comprising senior officers and employees, oversee a consistent framework of pricing controls and valuation processes for the firm and its advisory affiliates. If market quotations for a security are unavailable, the Valuation Committee determines its fair value.

Extraordinary market volatility, liquidity constraints, or failure to consider all factors when determining fair value could lead to improper valuation of securities. This could result in inaccurate AUM figures, incorrect net asset values for company-sponsored funds, and inaccurate financial reporting. Although the percentage of our AUM based on limited market observability is not significant, inaccurate valuations can harm clients, create regulatory issues, and damage our reputation.

The quantitative and systematic models we use in certain of our investment services may contain errors, resulting in imprecise risk assessments and unintended output.

We use quantitative and systematic models in many of our investment services, often alongside fundamental research. These models are developed by senior quantitative professionals and implemented by IT professionals. Our Model Risk Oversight Committee, supported by the Model Risk Team, oversees the model governance framework and review activities. However, due to the complexity and data dependency of these models, errors may occur, and our controls might fail to detect them. Undetected errors could lead to client losses and reputational damage.

The financial services industry is intensely competitive.

We compete based on factors such as investment performance, range of services, innovation, reputation, and price. Our global presence means we often face competitors with more experience and established relationships in local markets, potentially hindering our expansion. If we fail to maintain or improve our investment performance, client flows may suffer, making competition more challenging.

Increased competition could reduce the demand for our products and services, adversely affecting our financial condition, results of operations and business prospects. For more information regarding competitive factors, see “Competition” in Item 1.

18 AllianceBernstein

Table of Contents

Part I

People-related Risks

We may be unable to continue to attract, motivate and retain key personnel, and the cost to retain key personnel could put pressure on our adjusted operating margin.

Our business relies on attracting, motivating, and retaining highly skilled technical, investment, managerial, and executive personnel. The market for these professionals is extremely competitive, and their departure could lead to losing client accounts or fewer new business opportunities, adversely affecting our operations and prospects.

A decline in revenues may limit our ability to offer competitive compensation, and maintaining or increasing pay without a revenue increase could negatively impact our operating margin. For additional information regarding our compensation practices, see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" in Item 11.

The relocation of our headquarters may present issues that were not initially envisioned.

We have relocated many positions from the New York metropolitan area to our new corporate headquarters in Nashville, Tennessee (see “Relocation Strategy” in Item 7 for more details). While the transition period has been completed, and the associated transition costs and favorable EPU impact have been in line with our estimates, the ongoing long term impact of this move is uncertain and may affect our ability to motivate and retain current employees and hire qualified staff in Nashville.

Employee misconduct, which can be difficult to detect and deter, could harm us by impairing our ability to attract and retain clients and subjecting us to significant regulatory scrutiny, legal liability and reputational harm.

The financial services industry has seen several high-profile cases of employee fraud and misconduct, and we are not immune. Misconduct could involve the improper use or disclosure of confidential information, leading to legal action, regulatory sanctions, and reputational or financial harm. Additionally, fraud, bribery, and other deceptive practices by our employees could result in regulatory scrutiny, legal liability, and reputational damage.

Operational, Technology and Cyber-related Risks

Technology failures and disruptions, including failures to properly safeguard confidential information, can significantly constrain our operations and result in significant time and expense to remediate, which could result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations and business prospects.

We heavily rely on software and related technologies, both proprietary and from third-party vendors, for various business functions such as obtaining securities pricing, processing client transactions, storing data, and providing client reports. Despite our security measures and business continuity plans, we may still face system delays and interruptions due to natural disasters, hardware failures, software defects, power outages, acts of war, cyber attack or third-party failures. These issues could prevent us from performing critical business functions or complying with regulatory requirements, leading to loss of client confidence, reputational damage, disciplinary action, and liability.

Many of our software applications are licensed from third-party vendors who also provide support, upgrades, and maintenance. Suspension or termination of these licenses or services could cause temporary system delays or interruptions. Additionally, rapid technological advancements may allow competitors to implement more advanced platforms, putting us at a competitive disadvantage and negatively impacting our operations and business prospects.

We also risk losses if we fail to protect sensitive and confidential information. We handle and transmit confidential client and employee information and proprietary business data. Despite our protective measures, our systems could be vulnerable to cyber attacks or unauthorized access, including from insiders. Such breaches could expose our proprietary information to competitors, require significant resources to address, harm our reputation, and result in liability under data protection laws, increasing costs or reducing revenues.

We have recently transitioned to a new third-party financial accounting system.

At the start of the current fiscal year, we migrated our core financial accounting systems and corporate books and records to a third-party platform, resulting in significant changes to our operational processes and financial reporting workflows. Every component of this transition was carefully managed and a diligent testing plan was executed in preparation for this migration, but any project of this size exposes us to several risks, including increased reliance on the third-party service provider for the availability, security, and integrity of our financial data. Any service interruptions, cybersecurity incidents, or failures by the vendor to meet contractual obligations could impair our ability to process transactions or prepare accurate and timely financial statements. Additionally, the implementation of new internal controls over financial reporting may result in material weaknesses or significant deficiencies if not properly designed or executed. Furthermore, if the new system does not adequately support our regulatory record-keeping obligations, we could face regulatory scrutiny or enforcement actions.

Table of Contents

Part I

We are undergoing a multi-year transition to replace our core investment management technology systems, which subjects us to significant operational, financial, and strategic risks.

We have commenced a multi-year, phased initiative to replace our existing investment management technology suite with a new set of integrated systems that we expect to improve our ability to manage client assets while reducing our operating expenses. This transition is complex and involves significant risks, including potential operational disruptions, data integrity and security issues. Material failures in the implementation process could impair our ability to manage client assets, execute trades, or fulfill regulatory reporting obligations. In addition, the migration process increases the risk of data loss, corruption, or compromise of sensitive information could result in regulatory fines, legal claims, and reputational harm. While we have implemented project management protocols, data validation and security measures, and vendor oversight procedures, there can be no assurance that these controls will be effective or that the new systems will deliver the anticipated efficiencies or cost savings. Any of these factors, alone or in combination, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our increasing integration of artificial intelligence ("AI") and machine learning into our investment processes and business operations subject us to potential legal, financial and reputational risks.

We are increasingly integrating artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning tools into our investment research, portfolio management, back-office operations, client services and corporate functions. The use of these technologies introduces the potential for certain new risks, including lack of transparency in AI-driven outputs, potential data inaccuracies, model hallucinations and increased exposure to cybersecurity threats. While the firm has made significant investment in the oversight and management of the firm's employees' use of AI, we may not prevent all improper uses of AI by our staff. If employees of the firm use these tools in ways that are inconsistent with firm policy and training or we are unable to identify flawed or biased outputs, we could face regulatory scrutiny, legal claims, or reputational harm. Additionally, the regulatory environment for AI is rapidly evolving, and a material failure to comply with new laws or SEC rules could result in fines or enforcement actions.

Any significant security breach of our information and cyber security infrastructure, as well as our failure to properly escalate and respond to such an incident, may significantly harm our operations and reputation.

Ensuring the continuity and effectiveness of our information and cyber security infrastructure, policies, procedures, and capabilities is crucial to protect our systems and data. Although we have a robust cybersecurity infrastructure and incident preparedness strategy that we test frequently, we may not always be able to prevent or properly respond to a cyber incident. Despite our protective measures, including advanced security technology, our systems may still be vulnerable to unauthorized access, supply chain attacks, computer viruses, and other security threats, such as cybercriminal attacks (e.g., phishing and ransomware). These threats could significantly harm our operations, reduce our ability to service our clients and could damage our reputation. The impacts of which could lead to litigation, regulatory scrutiny, and cause us to incur significant remediation costs. For more details see "Cybersecurity" in Item 1C.

Climate change and other unpredictable events, including outbreak of infectious disease, natural disaster, dangerous weather conditions, technology failure, terrorist attack and political unrest, may adversely affect our ability to conduct business.

War, terrorist attacks, political unrest, power failures, climate change, natural disasters, and pandemics (such as COVID-19) could disrupt our operations by:

•decreasing investor confidence and making investment products less attractive;

•causing loss of life;

•triggering technology failures or delays;

•breaching our information and cyber security infrastructure; and

•requiring substantial capital expenditures and operating expenses to remediate damage and restore operations.

Climate change may increase the severity and frequency of disasters, affect our investment portfolio, and influence investor sentiment. It may also lead to regulatory changes impacting the companies in which we invest.

Despite our contingency plans, including system security measures, information backup, and disaster recovery processes, disruptions in infrastructure (electrical, communications, transportation) in key business centers (Nashville, New York City, San Antonio, London, Hong Kong, and India) could adversely affect our operations. If employees cannot access offices or communicate and travel, our business with clients may suffer, and contingency plans may fail.

Unauthorized access, system failures, or data loss could lead to legal proceedings, regulatory penalties, operational disruptions, and reputational damage. Loss of experienced staff or inadequate work facilities could also disrupt operations, affecting our financial condition and business prospects. Our property and business interruption insurance may not cover all potential losses.

20 AllianceBernstein

Table of Contents

Part I

Our own operational failures or those of third parties on which we rely, including failures arising out of human error, could disrupt our business, damage our reputation and reduce our revenues.

Weaknesses or failures in our internal processes or systems could disrupt operations, lead to client liability, disciplinary action, or harm our reputation. Our business relies on processing large, complex transactions daily across diverse markets, adhering to client guidelines and regulatory standards.

We must exercise skill, care, and prudence in our services. Despite our highly trained employees, the volume of transactions makes occasional errors likely. If a mistake causes financial harm to a client, we must promptly rectify it. Significant errors can materially affect our reputation, operations, and business prospects.

The individuals and third-party vendors on whom we rely to perform services for us or our clients may be unable or unwilling to honor their contractual obligations to us.

We rely on various counterparties and third-party vendors to enhance our investment, operational, financial, and technological capabilities. However, using third-party vendors does not diminish our responsibility to meet client and regulatory obligations. During market stress, default rates, credit downgrades, and collateral valuation disputes can increase significantly.

Financial market disruptions and economic challenges may cause our counterparties and vendors to face cash flow problems or insolvency, leading to significant costs and impairing our business operations. Weaknesses or failures in a vendor's processes, systems, or business continuity plans can disrupt our operations.

Additionally, vendors may lack the infrastructure to safeguard our confidential data effectively. If we cannot manage the risks associated with third-party relationships, we may face fines, disciplinary action, and reputational damage.

We may not always successfully manage actual and potential conflicts of interest that arise in our business.

We must increasingly manage actual and potential conflicts of interest, including situations where our services to one client may conflict with another's interests. Failure to address these conflicts adequately could harm our reputation, operations, and business prospects. We have procedures and controls to identify and mitigate conflicts, including preventing improper information sharing. However, managing conflicts is complex. If we fail, or appear to fail, in handling conflicts appropriately, our reputation could suffer, and clients may be less willing to engage with us. Additionally, potential or perceived conflicts could lead to litigation or regulatory enforcement actions.

Maintaining adequate liquidity for our general business needs depends on certain factors, including operating cash flows and our access to credit on reasonable terms.

Our financial condition depends on cash flow from operations, which is influenced by capital market performance, our ability to maintain and grow AUM, and other factors beyond our control. Adverse market conditions, profitability, perceived creditworthiness, and changes in government regulations, including tax and interest rates, may limit our ability to issue debt or borrow on reasonable terms. Our access to credit also depends on our firm's credit ratings.

In 2025, Moody’s and Standard & Poor's affirmed our long-term and short-term credit ratings with a stable outlook. However, future downgrades could increase borrowing costs and limit capital market access, potentially leading to unanticipated costs or revised strategic plans, adversely affecting our financial condition, operations, and business prospects.

An impairment of goodwill may occur.

Determining goodwill impairment requires significant management judgment. Prolonged depressed securities valuations, deteriorating market conditions, or significant net redemptions can adversely affect our AUM, revenues, profitability, and unit price. Although the AB Holding Unit price is one factor in fair value calculation, significant declines make it harder to conclude that fair value exceeds carrying value.

Economic conditions also impact control premiums, industry earnings multiples, and discount rates, potentially leading to more frequent impairment tests based on negative assumptions and future cash flow projections. This could result in a material charge to our earnings. For more information on our impairment testing, see Item 7.

The insurance that we purchase may not fully cover all potential exposures.

We maintain various types of insurance, including professional liability, errors & omissions, fidelity, cyber, property, casualty, and business interruption. However, this insurance may not cover all business risks and is subject to exclusions, limitations, high deductibles, and maximum limits. Some types of insurance may not always be available on commercially acceptable terms or at all. We cannot guarantee that claims will be covered by our policies, will not exceed our coverage, or that insurers will remain solvent. Future coverage may not be obtainable at current levels, and premiums may increase significantly. Additionally, if our affiliates exclude us from joint insurance arrangements, we may need to secure stand-alone coverage with potentially less favorable terms and higher costs.

Table of Contents

Part I

Legal and Regulatory-related Risks

Our business is subject to pervasive, complex and continuously evolving global regulation, compliance with which involves substantial expenditures of time and money, and violation of which may result in material adverse consequences.

Our business is subject to federal and state laws, securities regulations, exchange rules, and foreign jurisdiction laws. Violations could result in civil or criminal liability, sanctions, license or registration revocation, fines, or business suspension. Such outcomes could materially affect our financial condition, operations, and business prospects. Even without a finding of wrongdoing, regulatory proceedings could require significant time and money and potentially damage our reputation.

Global regulators have increased oversight of financial services, impacting our business with new and proposed regulations, especially in investment management. Compliance has also become more expensive and time-consuming. For example, regulatory focus on ESG practices remains significant. The SEC continues to scrutinize ESG investment labeling to prevent misleading claims. Privacy regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") in Europe have strengthened privacy rules for organizations handling personal data, granting individuals more rights and control over the use of their personal data, and greatly increasing penalties for noncompliance. In many other jurisdictions in which our subsidiaries operate, there is ongoing change to update and strengthen privacy regulations in a manner similar to GDPR. The European Commission's (the "EU") action plan and the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation also impose increased restrictions, disclosure obligations, and compliance costs, with potential reputational risks.

Our fund management company (“FMC”) operations in China are subject to a number of regulatory risks, created by an opaque political system, evolving regulatory environment and complex data security and data transfer regulations. Foreign governments like China could retaliate against businesses like ours for decisions made by the US government in areas like sanctions and tariffs. China's cybersecurity laws and regulations can be complex and may require companies to store data locally. Restrictions on transfers of certain types of onshore entity business information also may limit our ability to aggregate, report, and monitor such data on our global platform. These factors may increase compliance risk and costs, including the possibility that a breach of local regulation could result in penalties, fines and the revocation of our FMC license.

We are involved in various legal proceedings and regulatory matters and may be involved in such proceedings in the future, any one or combination of which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.

We are involved in various regulatory inquiries, administrative proceedings, and litigation, some alleging significant damages, with potential for future involvement in additional matters. Litigation carries significant uncertainties, particularly when plaintiffs allege substantial or indeterminate damages, the litigation is in its early stages, or when the litigation is highly complex or broad in scope.

Structure-related Risks

The partnership structure of AB Holding and AB limits Unitholders’ abilities to influence the management and operation of AB’s business and is highly likely to prevent a change in control of AB Holding and AB.

The General Partner has exclusive authority to manage and operate AB Holding and AB, unless otherwise stated in their Amended and Restated Partnership Agreements. AB Holding and AB Unitholders have limited voting rights compared to corporate common stockholders. Unitholders cannot vote for directors of the General Partner and can only vote on certain extraordinary matters, including the removal of the General Partner under specific circumstances. The AB Partnership Agreement also restricts the transfer of AB Units and effectively prevents the removal of the General Partner, making a change in control of AB’s management highly unlikely.

AB Units are illiquid and subject to significant transfer restrictions.

There is no public trading market for AB Units, and we do not expect one to develop. The AB Partnership Agreement restricts participation in a public trading market to avoid classification as a "publicly traded partnership" (“PTP”) under Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), rendering any such transfer void. AB Units also face significant transfer restrictions, requiring written consent from EQH and the General Partner. Transfers that risk AB being treated as a corporation for tax purposes are generally not permitted. EQH and the General Partner have a transfer program that requires sellers to find buyers and imposes annual volume restrictions. You can request a copy of the transfer program from our Corporate Secretary or find it as Exhibit 10.07 in this Form 10-K.

Changes in the treatment of AB Holding and AB as partnerships for tax purposes would have significant tax ramifications.

AB Holding has elected to be taxed as a PTP under Section 7704(g) of the Internal Revenue Code, with a 3.5% federal tax on its gross income from active business. To maintain its PTP status, AB Holding cannot directly or indirectly (through AB) enter into a substantial new line of business. A new line of business is defined as one not closely related to AB’s historical activities, and it becomes substantial if it generates more than 15% of the partnership's gross income or uses more than 15% of its assets (by value).

22 AllianceBernstein

Table of Contents

Part I

Additionally, AB Units must not be considered publicly traded to maintain AB’s status as a private partnership for tax purposes. If AB Holding or AB were taxed as a corporation, Unitholders would face double taxation: first at the corporate level, then on dividends received.

Both AB Holding and AB are subject to a 4.0% New York City unincorporated business tax ("UBT"), with AB Holding able to offset UBT credits paid by AB. There are no assurances that AB Holding will remain a PTP or continue to receive the current tax benefits associated with being a PTP.

Changes in tax law governing us or an increase in business activities outside the U.S. could have a material impact on us.

Legislative proposals, if enacted when proposed, could materially affect us, but their outcomes are unpredictable. AB management is monitoring potential impacts of new legislation. AB's non-U.S. subsidiaries are subject to local taxes. Increased operations abroad or changes in foreign tax laws or rates could raise AB's effective tax rate.

If any audit by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") of our income tax returns for any of our taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 results in any adjustments, the IRS may collect any resulting taxes, including any applicable penalties and interest, directly from us, in which case our net income and the cash available for quarterly Unitholder distributions may be substantially reduced.

For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, a "partnership representative" that we designate (a “Partnership Representative”) has sole authority to act on our behalf in IRS audits and similar state or local audits. Actions taken by the Partnership Representative will be binding on us and our Unitholders.

In an audit of a partnership's taxable years starting after December 31, 2017, the IRS typically adjusts at the partnership level in the year the audit is resolved. We may collect any resulting tax liability (and related interest or penalties) from Unitholders based on their percentage interests, but there is no guarantee we will do so. If we do not collect this tax liability from our Unitholders, our net income and available cash for quarterly distributions could decrease. As a result, current Unitholders may bear some or all of the tax liability, even if they did not own Units during the audited year.

Additionally, we may request adjustments to passive losses from certain audits, which could reduce suspended passive loss carryovers.

We may also make a “push-out” election, which would require our Unitholders to account for audit adjustments on their tax returns. This may require Unitholders to provide certain information to us, including details about beneficial owners. However, we are not required to make this election and may be unable or unwilling to do so. If we do not make the push-out election, we would have to pay any taxes resulting from the adjustments, which would reduce the cash available for distribution to Unitholders.

Non-U.S. unitholders may be subject to withholding tax on the sale of their AB Units or AB Holding Units, as well as on distributions, and we may be liable for any under-withholding.

Gain or loss from the sale or exchange of a partnership unit by a non-U.S. unitholder is treated as effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business and subject to U.S. federal income tax if the non-U.S. unitholder would have had effectively connected gain or loss on a hypothetical sale of the partnership's assets at fair market value. A transferee must withhold 10% of the amount realized on the transfer unless an exception applies.

Distributions by a PTP to a non-U.S. unitholder are also subject to U.S. withholding tax if the PTP has effectively connected gross income, gain, or loss. A transferee is not required to withhold tax if it relies on a certification from the transferor or the partnership that an exception applies. If a transferee fails to withhold when required, AB must withhold on distributions to the transferee to cover the liability.

A broker is not required to withhold on the transfer of a PTP interest or on a PTP distribution if the PTP certifies that the "10% exception" applies. This exception applies if the PTP was not engaged in a U.S. trade or business during a specified period, or if a hypothetical sale of the PTP's assets would result in less than 10% of the total net gain being effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business, or no gain would be effectively connected. To certify this, the PTP must issue a "qualified notice" indicating it qualifies for the exception, which we have done and will continue to do. The notice must state the distribution amounts attributable to each income group specified in the Treasury Regulations, be posted on the PTP's primary public website for 10 years, and be delivered to any registered nominee holder. A broker cannot rely on the certification if it knows it is incorrect or unreliable.

As a PTP, AB Holding may be liable for any under-withholding by a broker relying on a qualified notice if we fail to make a reasonable estimate of the amounts required for the 10% exception.

Table of Contents

Part I

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Neither AB nor AB Holding has unresolved comments from the staff of the SEC to report.

Item 1C. Cybersecurity

Cyber Risk Management and Strategy

Through a combination of security, risk and compliance resources, AB implements information security through a dedicated Information Security Program ("ISP") that is intended to identify, assess and manage material risks from cybersecurity threats and which includes a focus on safeguarding information and assets from cyber threats, engaging in cyber threat monitoring and responding to actual or potential cyber incidents. Our ISP is led by our Chief Information Security Officer ("CISO") who actively partners with our Chief Compliance Officer ("CCO") and Chief Risk Officer "("CRO"). Ultimately, our ISP is part of our full enterprise risk framework, which includes information technology, business continuity and resiliency, in addition to cybersecurity risk. Enterprise risk, including cybersecurity risk, is overseen by the Audit and Risk Committee ("Audit Committee") on behalf of the Board.

Our CISO, with assistance from internal and external resources, is responsible for implementing and providing oversight of our ISP. The ISP employs a defense-in-depth strategy: an information assurance concept in which multiple layers of security controls are distributed throughout an operating environment. The defense-in-depth strategy manages risk with diverse defensive strategies, so that if one layer of defense fails, another layer of defense will attempt to compensate. Our ISP features cybersecurity policies, standards and guidelines, committee governance, training, access controls and data controls. We periodically execute table top exercises as a part of our ISP program.

Our ISP, together with our risk and compliance resources, proactively manage the risk of threat from cybersecurity incidents through (i) implementing protocols to take cybersecurity considerations into account in adopting and onboarding our technology resources, (ii) monitoring IT controls to better ensure compliance with cybersecurity and other related legal and regulatory requirements, (iii) periodically assessing adherence by critical and material third parties we partner with to ensure that the appropriate risk management standards are met, (iv) essential business functions remaining available during a business disruption, and (v) regularly developing and updating response plans to address potential IT or cyber incidents should they occur. We also maintain an operational security function that has a real time response capability that triages potential incidents and triggers, as appropriate, impact mitigation protocols. Additionally, we utilize third parties to conduct periodic cybersecurity assessments to identify, assess, manage, and as appropriate, mitigate and respond to cybersecurity risks, and our internal audit function includes certain cyber risk audits as part of its overall risk audit. Our cybersecurity processes rely predominantly on internal resources, but also include important third party resources for certain matters, including the aforementioned assessments as well as our continuous cybersecurity threat monitoring and initial incident reporting system.

As part of our ISP, we also perform cyber risk assessments on our third party vendors where we deem appropriate based on our risk assessment of such vendors, then periodically thereafter.

As of the date of this report, the Company is not aware of any cybersecurity threats that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be materially affected by such risks. See Item 1A Risk Factors - Operations, Technology and Cyber-Related Risks for a discussion of cybersecurity risks.

Cyber Risk Governance

The Audit Committee is responsible for assisting the Board with oversight of our enterprise risk framework, including cybersecurity, information security, information technology and business continuity and resiliency. Our CISO and other members of senior management including our General Counsel, CCO and CRO report quarterly to the Audit Committee at its regular meetings on the status of the Company's cybersecurity risk, risk management policies and risk assessment initiatives. The full Board is updated on an as needed basis. In addition, management updates the Audit Committee, as appropriate, regarding any material cybersecurity threats or incidents, as well as any incidents with lesser impact potential.

While our Board provides oversight of our cybersecurity risk environment, the ultimate responsibility for our processes for identifying, assessing and managing cybersecurity risks resides with management.Our CISO, with assistance from internal and external resources, is responsible for the implementation and providing oversight to our ISP within the organization and maintaining the appropriate level of expertise to manage and implement cybersecurity policies, programs and strategies. Our CISO has years of applied experience in actively managing cybersecurity and information security programs for large global publicly traded companies with complex and evolving information systems. Management oversight of our ISP is provided by various governance committees including the Operational Risk Oversight Committee, the Information Security Risk Oversight Subcommittee and the Financial Crimes Control Oversight Subcommittee.

24 AllianceBernstein

Table of Contents

Part I

Item 2. Properties

Our headquarters is located at 501 Commerce Street, Nashville, Tennessee. We lease approximately 219,000 square feet of space under a 15-year lease expiring in 2036. We occupy approximately 192,000 square feet of this space and have subleased approximately 27,000 square feet of this space under a sublease expiring in 2036.

We have a 20-year lease agreement in New York, New York, at 66 Hudson Boulevard, for approximately 186,000 square feet that commenced in January 2024 and expires in December 2044.

We also lease approximately 51,000 square feet of space in San Antonio, Texas under a lease expiring in 2029.

Additionally, we lease approximately 156,000 square feet of space in Pune, India. Approximately 48,000 square feet is under a lease expiring in 2032 with the remaining 108,000 square feet under a lease expiring in 2033.

We lease more modest amounts of space in 27 other cities in the United States.

Our subsidiaries lease space in 32 cities outside the United States, the most significant of which is a lease in London, England, expiring in 2031, and in Hong Kong, China, under a lease expiring in 2027. In London we currently lease approximately 68,000 square feet of space of which 28,000 is sublet to our unconsolidated joint venture. In Hong Kong, we currently lease and occupy approximately 36,000 square feet of space.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Legal Proceedings

For significant litigation matters, we assess the likelihood of a negative outcome. If a negative outcome is probable and the loss can be reasonably estimated, we record an estimated loss. If a negative outcome is reasonably possible and we can estimate the potential loss or range of loss beyond any amounts already accrued, we disclose this information. However, predicting outcomes or estimating losses is often challenging due to litigation uncertainties, especially in early stages or complex cases. In such instances, we disclose our inability to predict the outcome or estimate losses.

AB may face regulatory inquiries, administrative proceedings, and litigation, some alleging significant damages. While it is possible we could incur losses from these matters, we cannot currently estimate such losses or their range. Management, after consulting with legal counsel, believes that the outcome of any individual or combined matters will not materially affect our operations, financial condition, or liquidity. However, due to inherent uncertainties, future developments could potentially have a material adverse effect on our results, financial condition, or liquidity in future reporting periods.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

Part II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market for AB Holding Units and AB Units; Cash Distributions

AB Holding Units are listed on the NYSE and trade publicly under the ticker symbol “AB". There is no established public trading market for AB Units, which are subject to significant restrictions on transfer. For information about these transfer restrictions, see “Structure-related Risks” in Item 1A.

AB Holding’s principal source of income and cash flow is attributable to its limited partnership interests in AB.

Each of AB Holding and AB distributes on a quarterly basis all of its Available Cash Flow, as defined in the AB Holding Partnership Agreement and the AB Partnership Agreement, respectively, to its Unitholders and the General Partner. For additional information concerning distribution of Available Cash Flow by AB Holding, see Note 2 to AB Holding’s financial statements in Item 8. For additional information concerning distribution of Available Cash Flow by AB, see Note 2 to AB’s consolidated financial statements in Item 8.

On December 31, 2025 (the last trading day of the year), the closing price of an AB Holding Unit on the NYSE was $38.48 per Unit. On December 31, 2025, there were (i) 802 AB Holding Unitholders of record for approximately 105,000 beneficial owners, and (ii) 361 AB Unitholders of record (we do not believe there are substantial additional beneficial owners).

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities

We did not engage in any unregistered sales of our securities during the year ended December 31, 2025, except as previously disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 14, 2025, in connection with the amended and restated exchange agreement entered into with EQH on July 10, 2025.

We did not engage in any unregistered sales of our equity securities during the year ended December 31, 2024, except as previously disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 19, 2024, in connection with the master exchange agreement and purchase agreement entered into with EQH.

We did not engage in any unregistered sales of our securities during the year ended December 31, 2023.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

Each quarter, AB considers whether to implement a plan to repurchase AB Holding Units pursuant to Rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the Exchange Act. The plan adopted during the fourth quarter expired at the close of business on December 26, 2025. AB may adopt additional plans in the future to engage in open-market purchases of AB Holding Units to help fund anticipated obligations under the firm’s incentive compensation award program and for other corporate purposes. For additional information about Rule 10b5-1 plans, see “Units Outstanding” in Item 7.

26 AllianceBernstein

Table of Contents

Part II

AB Holding Units bought by us or one of our affiliates during the fourth quarter of 2025 are as follows:

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

(1)During the fourth quarter of 2025, AB purchased 740,598 AB Holding Units on the open market pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan to help fund anticipated obligations under our incentive compensation award program.

(2)During the fourth quarter of 2025, AB retained from employees 2,040,086 AB Holding Units to allow them to fulfill statutory withholding tax requirements at the time of distribution of long-term incentive compensation awards.

Table of Contents

Part II

Item 6. [Reserved]

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Executive Overview(1)

Our total Assets Under Management ("AUM") as of December 31, 2025 were $866.9 billion, up $74.7 billion, or 9.4%, during 2025. The increase was primarily driven by market appreciation of $86.0 billion, partially offset by net outflows of $11.3 billion (reflecting Institutional net outflows of $4.6 billion and Retail net outflows of $9.1 billion, offset by Private Wealth Management net inflows of $2.4 billion).

Institutional AUM increased $32.8 billion, or 10.2%, to $354.2 billion during 2025, primarily due to market appreciation of $37.0 billion, partially offset by net outflows of $4.6 billion. Gross sales increased $13.7 billion, from $13.0 billion in 2024 to $26.7 billion in 2025. Redemptions and terminations decreased $2.3 billion, from $14.9 billion in 2024 to $12.6 billion in 2025.

Retail AUM increased $22.1 billion, or 6.6%, to $356.4 billion during 2025, primarily due to market appreciation of $31.3 billion, partially offset by net outflows of $9.1 billion. Gross sales decreased $9.7 billion, from $99.9 billion in 2024 to $90.2 billion in 2025. Redemptions and terminations increased $15.8 billion, from $71.7 billion in 2024 to $87.5 billion in 2025.

Private Wealth Management AUM increased $19.8 billion, or 14.4%, to $156.3 billion during 2025, primarily due to market appreciation of $17.7 billion and net inflows of $2.4 billion. Gross sales increased $2.3 billion, from $20.8 billion in 2024 to $23.1 billion in 2025. Redemptions and terminations increased $0.8 billion, from $19.9 billion in 2024 to $20.7 billion in 2025.

Bernstein Research Services ("BRS") revenue decreased $96.2 million, or 100.0%, during 2025. The decrease was due to the deconsolidation of the BRS business and contribution of the business to the joint ventures, on April 1, 2024. For further discussion, see Note 24 Divestitures to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8.

Our 2025 net revenues of $4.5 billion increased $55.5 million, or 1.2%, compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily due to higher investment advisory base fees of $175.1 million and higher distribution revenues of $91.8 million, partially offset by lower Bernstein Research Services revenue of $96.2 million due to the deconsolidation of the BRS business, lower performance-based fees of $85.7 million, higher investment losses of $17.4 million and lower other revenues of $8.6 million.

Our operating expenses of $3.5 billion increased $129.1 million, or 3.9%, compared to operating expenses of $3.4 billion in the prior year. The increase was primarily due to the recognition of a gain on contingent payment arrangements of $121.0 million in the prior year and higher promotion and servicing expense of $76.8 million, partially offset by lower general and administrative expenses of $42.2 million, lower employee compensation and benefits expense of $11.3 million and lower interest on borrowings of $15.2 million. The change in contingent payment arrangements was primarily due to the recognition of a gain of $128.5 million in 2024 related to a fair value remeasurement of the contingent payment liability associated with our acquisition of AB CarVal in 2022.

Our operating income decreased $73.6 million, or 6.5%, to $1.1 billion compared to 2024 and our operating margin decreased to 23.0% in 2025 from 24.7% in 2024.

Market Environment

U.S. Equities

U.S. stocks finished higher in the fourth quarter of 2025, despite a long government shutdown and signs of a cooling labor market. The S&P 500 gained 2.7% for the quarter and delivered about 18% for the year, its third straight year of double‐digit returns. Small‐cap stocks, represented by the Russell 2000, rose 2.2% in the fourth quarter and ended the year up 13%. Value stocks outpaced growth late in the year, and sectors such as health care and other defensive areas outperformed. Energy stocks lagged as oil prices softened, while utilities saw mixed results. The Federal Reserve cut interest rates by 0.25% in December, its third cut of the year, and signaled a more cautious approach for 2026. This added some late‐year volatility and profit‐taking, especially in smaller companies.

(1) Percentage change figures are calculated using assets under management rounded to the nearest million, while financial statement amounts are rounded to the nearest hundred thousand.

28 AllianceBernstein

Table of Contents

Part II

Global and Non-U.S. Equities

International stocks outperformed U.S. stocks in the fourth quarter of 2025 and posted stronger full‐year returns for the first time in several years. A weaker U.S. dollar, more attractive valuations, and investors shifting away from U.S. mega‐cap technology companies all helped performance. Eurozone markets ended near multi‐year highs, rising 41% for the year (USD, gross), with financials benefiting from lower interest rates and improving loan quality. The U.K. market also finished near multi‐year highs, gaining 35% in 2025 (USD, gross), supported by globally focused financials, mining, defense, and commodity‐related companies; domestic‐focused businesses lagged due to softer consumer demand. In Japan, stocks continued to climb as expectations for fiscal support grew and the Bank of Japan took initial steps toward normalizing policy. Emerging markets also posted positive fourth‐quarter results and beat developed markets for the year, helped by strong performance in Korea and Taiwan, as well as gains in Chile, South Africa, Brazil, Mexico, and India. China declined late in the year amid profit‐taking and property‐market concerns, and Saudi Arabia trailed.

Global Bonds

Bond markets moved through shifting interest‐rate expectations in the fourth quarter of 2025. Cooling inflation and a 0.25% rate cut by the Federal Reserve helped shorter‐term yields fall. Ten‐year U.S. Treasury yields ended the year near 4.2%, and the yield curve steepened as longer‐term rates held steady. Core bonds posted positive returns; mortgage‐backed securities outperformed Treasuries, and municipal bonds benefited from seasonal demand. Corporate credit also held up well, with investment‐grade spreads tightening slightly and high‐yield and emerging‐market debt supported by stronger risk appetite. Outside the U.S., bond performance was mixed as markets in the U.K., Germany, and Japan reacted to changing fiscal and monetary signals. For 2025 overall, the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Index returned 8.2% (USD, unhedged), and the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index returned 7.3%, thanks largely to declining short‐term rates.

Relationship with EQH and its Subsidiaries

EQH (our parent company) and its subsidiaries are our largest client. EQH is collaborating with AB in order to improve the risk-adjusted yield for the General Accounts of EQH's insurance subsidiaries by investing additional assets at AB, including the utilization of AB's higher-fee, longer-duration alternative offerings. In mid-2021, Equitable Financial Life Insurance Company, a subsidiary of EQH ("Equitable Financial"), agreed to provide an initial $10 billion in permanent capital to build out AB's private illiquid offerings, including private alternatives and private placements. Deployment of the initial $10 billion in permanent capital is now complete. In addition, during the second quarter of 2023, EQH committed to provide an additional $10 billion in permanent capital, deployment of which is substantially complete. We expect this anticipated capital from EQH's insurance subsidiaries will continue to accelerate both organic and inorganic growth in our private alternatives business, allowing us to continue to deliver for our clients, employees, unitholders and other stakeholders.

Permanent capital means investment capital of indefinite duration, for which commitments may be withdrawn under certain conditions. Such conditions primarily include potential regulatory restrictions, lacking sufficient liquidity to fund the capital commitments to AB and AB's inability to identify attractive investment opportunities which align with the investment strategy. Although EQH’s insurance subsidiaries have indicated their intention over time to provide this investment capital to AB, they have no binding commitment to do so. While the withdrawal of their commitment could potentially slow down our introduction of certain products, the impact to our overall operations would not be material.

Joint Venture with Societe Generale

On April 1, 2024, AB and Societe Generale ("SocGen") formed a global joint venture with two joint venture holding companies, one outside of North America (the "ROW JV") and one within North America ("NA JV", and together the "JVs"). As of December 31, 2025, AB owned a majority interest in the NA JV while SocGen owned a majority interest in ROW JV. AB deconsolidated the BRS business and retained the Bernstein Private Wealth Management business within its existing U.S. broker dealer Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., LLC.

As a result of the greater value of the business AB contributed to the JVs, SocGen paid AB $304.0 million in cash to equalize the value of the contributions by AB and SocGen to the JVs. The cash payment of $304.0 million included $102.6 million of prepaid consideration for an option, exercisable by AB during the next five years, that would result in SocGen having a 51% ownership of the NA JV (the "AB option") and bringing the transaction ownership terms back in line with the Initial Plan. AB's option could only be exercised upon receipt of appropriate regulatory approvals.

During the third quarter of 2025, appropriate regulatory approval for SocGen to increase its ownership to 51% was received and AB issued formal notice of its intent to exercise the AB option. On January 1, 2026 AB entered into an Amended and Restated Shareholder agreement with SocGen (the "Amendment Agreement") and exercised the AB option to deliver a 17.7% interest in the NA JV to SocGen resulting in AB owning a 49% interest in the NA JV and SocGen having a majority interest of 51%. The prepaid consideration received was in excess of the carrying value of the 17.7% equity in the NA JV resulting in an estimated gain of $48.4 million recognized in the first quarter of 2026.

Table of Contents

Part II

Subsequent to the Amendment Agreement, on January 1, 2026, AB entered into a Contribution Agreement (the "Contribution Agreement") with SocGen, to bring the ownership back in line with the intent of the Initial Plan. Prior to the Contribution Agreement, SocGen and AB had a 51% and 49% interest in both JVs, respectively. Under the Contribution Agreement AB contributed its 49% interest in NA JV, and SocGen contributed its 51% interest in NA JV, for an equal interest in newly issued shares of ROW JV resulting in a single JV comprised of the operations and interest of both JVs (the "AB/SG JV"). AB still maintains its additional option to sell its ownership interests in the AB/SG JV to SocGen after five years from the Initial Close, at the fair market value of AB’s interests in the AB/SG JV, subject to regulatory approval. The ultimate objective of SocGen and AB is for SocGen to eventually own 100% of the AB/SG JV after five years.

For further discussion, see Note 24 Divestitures to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8.

AB Holding

AB Holding’s principal source of income and cash flow is attributable to its investment in AB Units. The AB Holding financial statements, notes to the financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with those of AB.

Results of Operations

Years Ended December 31 % Change

(in thousands, except per unit amounts)

Weighted average equity ownership interest 33.9 % 39.4 % 39.2 %

(1)Distributions reflect the impact of AB’s non-GAAP adjustments.

AB Holding had net income of $299.8 million in 2025 compared to $423.4 million in 2024, reflecting lower net income attributable to AB Unitholders and lower weighted average equity ownership interest. AB Holding had net income of $423.4 million in 2024 compared to $264.2 million in 2023, reflecting higher net income attributable to AB Unitholders and higher weighted average equity ownership interest.

AB Holding's partnership gross income is derived from its interest in AB. AB Holding’s income taxes, which reflect a 3.5% federal tax on its partnership gross income from the active conduct of a trade or business, are computed by multiplying certain AB qualifying revenues by AB Holding’s ownership interest in AB, multiplied by the 3.5% tax rate. Certain AB qualifying revenues are primarily U.S. investment advisory fees. AB Holding’s effective tax rate was 9.9%, 8.4% and 11.9% in 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The increase in AB Holdings effective tax rate in 2025 is primarily driven by one-time items in the prior year not subject to the gross revenue tax. See Note 6 to AB Holding’s financial statements in Item 8for a further description.

As supplemental information, AB provides the performance measures “adjusted net revenues,” “adjusted operating income” and “adjusted operating margin,” which are additional metrics management uses in evaluating and comparing the period-to-period operating performance of AB. Management uses these additional metrics in evaluating performance because they present a clearer picture of AB's operating performance and allow management to see long-term trends without the distortion primarily caused by long-term incentive compensation-related mark-to-market adjustments, acquisition-related expenses, interest expense and other adjustment items. Similarly, management believes that these management operating metrics help investors better understand the underlying trends in AB's results and, accordingly, provide a valuable perspective for investors. Such measures are not based on generally accepted accounting principles (“non-GAAP measures”).

We provide the non-GAAP measures "adjusted net income" and "adjusted net income per Unit" because our quarterly distribution per unit is typically our adjusted net income per unit (which is derived from adjusted net income).

30 AllianceBernstein

Table of Contents

Part II

These non-GAAP measures are provided in addition to, and not as substitutes for, net revenues, operating income and operating margin, and they may not be comparable to non-GAAP measures presented by other companies. Management uses both GAAP and non-GAAP measures in evaluating the company’s financial performance. The non-GAAP measures alone may pose limitations because they do not include all of AB’s revenues and expenses. Further, adjusted net income per AB Holding Unit is not a liquidity measure and should not be used in place of cash flow measures. See “Management Operating Metrics” in this Item 7.

The impact of these adjustments on AB Holding’s net income and net income per AB Holding Unit are as follows:

Years Ended December 31

(in thousands, except per unit amounts)

AB Income tax (expense) benefit on non-GAAP adjustments (6,362) 8,338 (2,786)

Net income per AB Holding Unit, GAAP basis $ 2.97 $ 3.71 $ 2.34

Impact of AB non-GAAP adjustments 0.36 (0.46) 0.35

Adjusted net income per AB Holding Unit $ 3.33 $ 3.25 $ 2.69

(2)Includes all AB non-GAAP adjustments to pre-tax income.

The degree to which AB’s non-GAAP adjustments impact AB Holding’s net income fluctuates based on AB Holding's ownership percentage in AB.

Tax Legislation

For a discussion of tax legislation, see “Risk Factors - Structure-related Risks” in Item 1A.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

During the year ended December 31, 2025, net cash provided by operating activities was $352.4 million, compared to $340.5 million during the corresponding 2024 period. The increase primarily resulted from higher cash distributions received from AB of $8.8 million. During the year ended December 31, 2024, net cash provided by operating activities was $340.5 million, compared to $294.0 million during the corresponding 2023 period. The increase primarily resulted from higher cash distributions received from AB of $47.7 million.

There was no cash used in or provided by investing activities during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023.

During the year ended December 31, 2025, net cash used in financing activities was $352.4 million, compared to $340.5 million during the corresponding 2024 period. The increase was primarily due to higher cash distributions to Unitholders of $11.2 million. During the year ended December 31, 2024, net cash used in financing activities was $340.5 million, compared to $294.0 million during the corresponding 2023 period. The increase was primarily due to higher cash distributions to Unitholders of $45.1 million and lower capital contributions from AB of $1.4 million.

Management believes that AB Holding will have the resources it needs to meet its financial obligations as a result of the cash flow AB Holding realizes from its investment in AB. AB Holding’s cash inflow is comprised entirely of distributions from AB. These distributions are subsequently distributed (net of taxes paid) in their entirety to AB Holding’s Unitholders. As a result, AB Holding has no liquidity risk as it only pays distributions to AB Holding’s Unitholders to the extent of distributions received from AB (net of taxes paid).

Table of Contents

Part II

Cash Distributions

AB Holding is required to distribute all of its Available Cash Flow, as defined in the AB Holding Partnership Agreement, to its Unitholders (including the General Partner). Available Cash Flow typically is the adjusted net income per Unit for the quarter multiplied by the number of units outstanding at the end of the quarter. Management anticipates that Available Cash Flow will continue to be based on adjusted net income per Unit. If management determines, with the concurrence of the Board of Directors, that certain adjustments to Available Cash Flow are necessary or unnecessary, such adjustments will be made in future periods. See Note 2 to AB Holding’s financial statements in Item 8 for a description of Available Cash Flow.

Commitments and Contingencies

For a discussion of commitments and contingencies, see Note 7 to AB Holding’s financial statements in Item 8.

AB

Assets Under Management

Assets under management by distribution channel are as follows:

As of December 31 % Change

(in billions)

Assets under management by investment service are as follows:

As of December 31 % Change

(in billions)

Equity

Fixed Income

Actively Managed

Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions(2)(3)

(1)Includes index and enhanced index services.

(2)Includes certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity or fixed income services.

(3)Approximately $12.1 billion of private placements was transferred from Taxable Fixed Income into Alternatives/Multi-Asset during 2024 to better align with standard industry practice for asset class reporting purposes.

32 AllianceBernstein

Table of Contents

Part II

Changes in assets under management during 2025 and 2024 are as follows:

Distribution Channel

Institutions Retail PrivateWealthManagement Total

(in billions)

Long-term flows:

Cash flow/unreinvested dividends (18.7) (11.8) — (30.5)

Net long-term (outflows) inflows (4.6) (9.1) 2.4 (11.3)

Long-term flows:

Cash flow/unreinvested dividends (14.6) (14.8) — (29.4)

Net long-term (outflows) inflows (16.5) 13.4 0.9 (2.2)

Adjustments (1) — — 0.7 0.7

Transfers 0.1 (0.1) — —

(1)This adjustment is due to a change in fee policy related to certain fixed income assets effective October 1, 2024.

Table of Contents

Part II

Investment Service

(in billions)

Long-term flows:

Transfers 0.5 (0.5) — — — — —

Long-term flows:

(1)Includes index and enhanced index services.

(2)Includes certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity or fixed income services.

Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain) · 10-K for the period ended 2025-12-31, filed 2026-02-12 · accession 0000825313-26-000020

Filing HTML rendered to line-structured narrative text by the shipped reducer (datafeeds.edgar_fulltext.visible_text, keep_table_headers=True): scripts and inline-XBRL headers are dropped, and table content is reduced to its short label cells — numeric table data is not rendered and is therefore not counted. The same rendering is used for every year, so a year-over-year comparison is like for like.

The text is our rendering of the filing, not a facsimile: original pagination, typography and tables are not reproduced, and the numbers live in the financial statements (FA).

The outline locates item HEADINGS in this document. Only Items 1A and 7 have certified boundaries elsewhere in the terminal (the redline and the narrative-overlap number); every span here runs from one heading found to the next heading found.

How the outline was chosen. It is the longest chain of item headings that runs forward through both the document and the standard item order: 23 headings are on that chain and 17 further heading-shaped lines are not — the table-of-contents echo of every item, cross-references and exhibit-list mentions. Each entry's length is measured from its heading to the next heading on the chain.