Item 1A. Risk Factors
Please consider this section along with the description of our business in Item 1, the competition section immediately above and AB’s financial information contained in Items 7 and 8. The majority of the risk factors discussed below directly affect AB. These risk factors also affect AB Holding because AB Holding’s principal source of income and cash flow is attributable to its investment in AB. See also “Cautions Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in Item 7.
Business-related Risks
Our revenues and results of operations depend on the market value and composition of our AUM, which can fluctuate significantly based on various factors, including many factors outside of our control.
We derive most of our revenues from investment advisory and services fees, typically calculated as a percentage of the value of AUM on a specified date or as an average over a billing period. These fees vary based on the type of service, account size, and total assets managed for a client. Several factors can adversely affect our AUM and composition, including:
•Market Factors: Our AUM remain sensitive to global financial market volatility, such as the inflationary pressures and interest rate increases in 2022 and 2023, followed by interest rate decreases and renewed inflationary concerns in 2024. Continued global economic uncertainty may lead to market volatility, potentially reducing our revenues and net income. Interconnected global economies mean that instability in one region can impact others. Political, social, or economic instability, wars (e.g., Ukraine and the Middle East), terrorism, health crises (e.g., COVID-19), natural disasters, and other unforeseen events can significantly affect financial markets and our AUM, revenues, and net income. Market volatility and reduced margin financing availability can limit liquidity, making it difficult to sell certain securities at their true value. While liquidity was stable in 2024, future deterioration could adversely affect our AUM, revenues, and net income.
•Geographic and Geopolitical Factors: Our clients and our AUM are geographically diverse as approximately 27% of our clients’ domicile is outside the US (primarily Europe, Asia, and the Americas) and approximately 38% of our AUM by Investment Services are non-US. Local or regional events including political, social, or economic instability, wars (e.g., Ukraine and the Middle East), challenges to currently recognized international borders (such as those made by China toward Taiwan), terrorism, health crises (e.g., COVID-19), natural disasters, and other unforeseen events can significantly affect our clients’ demand for our services, local and regional financial markets, and our AUM, revenues, and net income. Specifically, our clients and the investment funds we manage in mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong, as well as any of our investment services with a regional investment focus in this geographic area, may be significantly impacted by a China/Taiwan conflict. The disputed status of Taiwan and the possibility of military conflict with China is a significant geopolitical risk that could materially impact our business in Taiwan.
•Client Preferences: Clients can withdraw their assets at any time with short notice. Shifts in market dynamics and investment trends, such as a move towards less risky investments by defined benefit plan sponsors and a shift to lower-fee passive services, may reduce interest in our investment products. Loss or decrease in AUM reduces our advisory and services fees and revenues.
•Our Investment Performance: Our success in achieving investment returns that match or exceed those of similar asset classes and competing services is crucial for retaining clients and attracting new ones. If our investment performance is poor, either in absolute terms or compared to peers and benchmarks, clients may redeem their assets, and potential clients might choose other investment firms.
•Investing Trends: The fees we charge for our various investment products and services can vary widely. Our overall fee income changes as clients move their assets between accounts or products with different fee structures. For more details on our fee rates, see “Net Revenues” in Item 7).
•Service Changes: We might need to lower our fees, change our fee structures, or adjust the services we offer due to factors like new regulations, advancements in asset management technology (such as algorithmic strategies and new financial technologies), court rulings, and competitive pressures. Lowering our fees would decrease our revenue.
•Interest Rate Changes: Changes in interest rates, especially rapid and significant increases, can negatively impact investor interest in and the value of our fixed income and multi-asset investment portfolios.
Table of Contents
Part I
A decrease in the value or amount of our AUM, an adverse mix shift in our AUM, or a reduction in our fee levels would negatively impact our investment advisory fees and revenues. Reduced revenues, without a corresponding decrease in expenses, would adversely affect our operating results.
The shift from actively managed investment services to passive services has negatively impacted our investment advisory and services fees, revenues and results of operations, and this trend may continue.
The competitive landscape has become tougher as active managers, who select individual securities, have generally underperformed compared to passive services, which follow market indices. This general underperformance has reduced the flows into actively managed funds, and increased the flows into passive strategies. Achieving organic growth through net inflows remains challenging for active managers like us and requires gaining market share from other active managers.
Our reputation could suffer if we are unable to deliver consistent, competitive investment performance.
Our business relies on the trust and confidence of our clients. Damage to our reputation, such as from poor or inconsistent investment performance, can significantly reduce our AUM and hinder our ability to maintain or grow our business.
EQH and its subsidiaries provide a significant amount of our AUM and fund a significant portion of our new product initiatives, and if our agreements with them terminate or they withdraw capital support it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and/or financial condition.
EQH, our parent company, and its subsidiaries are our largest client, representing about 17% of our AUM as of December 31, 2024, and contributing approximately 4% of our net revenues. Our investment management agreements with EQH can be terminated at any time or on short notice by either party, and EQH is not obligated to maintain any level of AUM with us. Termination of these agreements by EQH could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Our business is dependent on investment advisory agreements with clients, and selling and distribution agreements with various financial intermediaries and consultants, which generally are subject to termination or non-renewal on short notice.
We generate most of our revenue through written investment management agreements with institutional investors, mutual funds, private wealth clients, and selling and distribution agreements with financial intermediaries that distribute AB Funds, including our active ETFs. These agreements, including those with EQH and its subsidiaries, can generally be terminated at any time or with short notice by either party. The investment management agreements for U.S. Funds must be reviewed and approved annually by the Funds’ boards of directors, most of whom are independent. There is no guarantee that these boards will approve the agreements each year or that they won't impose unfavorable terms. Additionally, investors in AB Funds can redeem their investments without notice. Termination or non-renewal of a significant number of these agreements, or a substantial increase in redemption rates, could negatively impact our operations and business prospects.
Similarly, our selling and distribution agreements with securities firms, brokers, banks, and other financial intermediaries can be terminated by either party with notice (usually 30 days) and do not require the intermediaries to sell a specific amount of fund shares. These intermediaries often offer competing investment products. Some institutional investors rely on consultants to choose investment advisers, and our services may not always be recommended by these consultants. This could lead to clients moving their assets to other advisers, resulting in significant net outflows.
Lastly, our Private Wealth Services depend on referrals from financial planners, registered investment advisers, and other professionals. We cannot be certain that we will continue to receive these referrals. Losing access to these referrals could adversely affect our operations and business prospects.
Performance-based fee arrangements with our clients may cause greater fluctuations in our net revenues.
We sometimes charge performance-based fees, which include a base advisory fee plus an additional fee based on investment results, either in absolute terms or relative to a benchmark. Some of these fees have a high-watermark provision, meaning if a client account underperforms, it must recover losses before we can earn future performance-based fees. Failure to meet performance targets means no performance-based fee for that period, and high-watermark provisions can impair future fee earnings.
We earn performance-based fees on 7.4%, 8.0% and 0.3% of the assets we manage for institutional clients, private wealth clients and retail clients, respectively (in total, 4.5% of our AUM). An increase in AUM subject to performance-based fees could lead to greater revenue and earnings volatility. Our performance-based fees were $271.0 million, $144.9 million and $145.2 million in 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
We may be unable to develop new products and services, and the development of new products and services may expose us to reputational harm, additional costs or operational risk.
Our financial performance relies on our ability to quickly adapt to changes in the asset management industry, meet evolving client needs, and develop, market, and manage new investment products and services. Creating new products, including those focused on specific industries, sectors, or criteria like ESG, requires continuous innovation, significant time, resources, and ongoing support.
18 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part I
Introducing new products and services involves substantial risks and uncertainties, such as establishing appropriate operational controls, adapting to shifting client and market preferences, facing competition, and complying with regulatory requirements. We cannot guarantee that we will successfully develop new products and services within the necessary timeframes. Failure to do so, or to manage the associated operational risks effectively, could damage our reputation, increase costs, and negatively impact our AUM, revenues, and operating income.
Fluctuations in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and various other currencies can adversely affect our AUM, revenues and results of operations.
Although much of our net revenues, expenses, and AUM are currently denominated in U.S. dollars, we have subsidiaries and clients outside the U.S. with different functional currencies. A weakening of these currencies relative to the U.S. dollar reduces the U.S. dollar value of our revenues and AUM denominated in those currencies. Consequently, fluctuations in U.S. dollar exchange rates impact our AUM, revenues, and reported financial results. Our efforts to hedge against these fluctuations may not be successful, potentially negatively affecting our revenues and financial results.
Our seed capital investments are subject to market risk. While we enter into various futures, forwards, swap and option contracts to economically hedge many of these investments, we also may be exposed to market risk and credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to these derivative instruments.
We have a seed investment program to build track records and support marketing for our new products. These investments are subject to market risk. Our risk management team oversees a seed hedging program to minimize this risk, considering practical and cost factors. However, not all seed investments are hedged, exposing us to market risk. Additionally, we may face basis risk, as we cannot always precisely hedge our market exposure, leading to potential relative spreads between market sectors. Consequently, capital market volatility can significantly impact our financial and operating results.
We use various derivative instruments, such as futures, forwards, swaps, and options, in our seed hedging program. While we hedge broad market risks, our hedges are imperfect, leaving some market risk. Furthermore, using derivatives introduces counterparty risk (the risk of credit-related losses if counterparties fail to perform), regulatory risk (e.g., short selling restrictions), and cash/synthetic basis risk (the risk that underlying positions do not move identically to related derivatives).
We may engage in strategic transactions that could pose risks.
As part of our business strategy, we consider strategic transactions (such as our insurance sidecar transaction with Ruby Reinsurance Company), including acquisitions (e.g., CarVal Investors in 2022), dispositions, mergers, consolidations, and joint ventures (e.g., our partnership with SocGen). These transactions may involve significant risks and challenges, including:
•adverse effects on our earnings if acquired intangible assets or goodwill become impaired;
•unknown liabilities or contingencies that arise post-closing;
•exposure to a new regulatory regime;
•potential disputes with counterparties; and
•increased leverage or dilution of existing Unitholders if transactions are funded with AB Units or AB Holding Units.
Acquisitions also pose the risk of losing customers or employees and underperforming relative to expectations. Additionally, losing investment personnel may result in losing expected AUM, adversely affecting our results of operations.
We carry non-controlling interests of joint ventures on our balance sheet that impact our financial performance.
Our business includes non-controlling interests in joint ventures, which pose several risks to our financial condition and results. As a non-controlling partner, we have limited influence over operations and strategic decisions, which may not align with our objectives. Each joint venture's actions could impact its profitability and our share of earnings. Financial difficulties or operational challenges may require us to impair the investment's value in our financial statements. Disputes with partners could lead to costly litigation or dissolution of the joint venture. These factors could reduce our investment returns and negatively impact our financial performance.
We are the guarantor of certain guarantees and credit lines of our consolidated and unconsolidated affiliates, over which we may have limited influence.
As guarantor for certain guarantees and credit lines of our subsidiaries, we face significant financial risks if any subsidiary experiences financial distress or defaults. In such cases, we may need to fulfill these commitments, which could affect our liquidity and financial condition. For unconsolidated affiliates, these risks may be heightened due to lack of control over those entities' operations.
We may not accurately value the securities we hold on behalf of our clients or our company investments.
In accordance with applicable regulatory requirements, contractual obligations or client direction, we have procedures for pricing and valuing securities and other positions in client accounts or company investments. Our Valuation Committee and sub-committees, comprising senior officers and employees, oversee a consistent framework of pricing controls and valuation processes for the firm and its advisory affiliates. If market quotations for a security are unavailable, the Valuation Committee determines its fair value.
Table of Contents
Part I
Extraordinary market volatility, liquidity constraints, or failure to consider all factors when determining fair value could lead to improper valuation of securities. This could result in inaccurate AUM figures, incorrect net asset values for company-sponsored funds, and inaccurate financial reporting. Although the percentage of our AUM based on limited market observability is not significant, inaccurate valuations can harm clients, create regulatory issues, and damage our reputation.
The quantitative and systematic models we use in certain of our investment services may contain errors, resulting in imprecise risk assessments and unintended output.
We use quantitative and systematic models in many of our investment services, often alongside fundamental research. These models are developed by senior quantitative professionals and implemented by IT professionals. Our Model Risk Oversight Committee, supported by the Model Risk Team, oversees the model governance framework and review activities. However, due to the complexity and data dependency of these models, errors may occur, and our controls might fail to detect them. Undetected errors could lead to client losses and reputational damage.
The financial services industry is intensely competitive.
We compete based on factors such as investment performance, range of services, innovation, reputation, and price. Our global presence means we often face competitors with more experience and established relationships in local markets, potentially hindering our expansion. If we fail to maintain or improve our investment performance, client flows may suffer, making competition more challenging.
Increased competition could reduce the demand for our products and services, adversely affecting on our financial condition, results of operations and business prospects. For more information regarding competitive factors, see “Competition” in Item 1.
People-related Risks
We may be unable to continue to attract, motivate and retain key personnel, and the cost to retain key personnel could put pressure on our adjusted operating margin.
Our business relies on attracting, motivating, and retaining highly skilled technical, investment, managerial, and executive personnel. The market for these professionals is extremely competitive, and their departure could lead to losing client accounts or fewer new business opportunities, adversely affecting our operations and prospects.
A decline in revenues may limit our ability to offer competitive compensation, and maintaining or increasing pay without a revenue increase could negatively impact our operating margin. For additional information regarding our compensation practices, see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" in Item 11.
Our process of relocating our headquarters may not be executed as we have envisioned.
We have relocated many positions from the New York metropolitan area to our new corporate headquarters in Nashville, Tennessee (see “Relocation Strategy” in Item 7 for more details). While the transition period has been completed, and the associated transition costs and favorable EPU impact have been in line with our estimates, the ongoing long term impact of this move is uncertain and may affect our ability to motivate and retain current employees and hire qualified staff in Nashville.
Employee misconduct, which can be difficult to detect and deter, could harm us by impairing our ability to attract and retain clients and subjecting us to significant regulatory scrutiny, legal liability and reputational harm.
The financial services industry has seen several high-profile cases of employee fraud and misconduct, and we are not immune. Misconduct could involve the improper use or disclosure of confidential information, leading to legal action, regulatory sanctions, and reputational or financial harm. Additionally, fraud, bribery, and other deceptive practices by our employees could result in regulatory scrutiny, legal liability, and reputational damage.
Operational, Technology and Cyber-related Risks
Technology failures and disruptions, including failures to properly safeguard confidential information, can significantly constrain our operations and result in significant time and expense to remediate, which could result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations and business prospects.
We heavily rely on software and related technologies, both proprietary and from third-party vendors, for various business functions such as obtaining securities pricing, processing client transactions, storing data, and providing client reports. Despite our security measures and business continuity plans, we may still face system delays and interruptions due to natural disasters, hardware failures, software defects, power outages, acts of war, cyber attack or third-party failures. These issues could prevent us from performing critical business functions or complying with regulatory requirements, leading to loss of client confidence, reputational damage, disciplinary action, and liability.
Many of our software applications are licensed from third-party vendors who also provide support, upgrades, and maintenance. Suspension or termination of these licenses or services could cause temporary system delays or interruptions. Additionally, rapid technological advancements may allow competitors to implement more advanced platforms, putting us at a competitive disadvantage and negatively impacting our operations and business prospects.
20 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part I
We also risk losses if we fail to protect sensitive and confidential information. We handle and transmit confidential client and employee information and proprietary business data. Despite our protective measures, our systems could be vulnerable to cyber attacks or unauthorized access, including from insiders. Such breaches could expose our proprietary information to competitors, require significant resources to address, harm our reputation, and result in liability under data protection laws, increasing costs or reducing revenues.
Any significant security breach of our information and cyber security infrastructure, as well as our failure to properly escalate and respond to such an incident, may significantly harm our operations and reputation.
Ensuring the continuity and effectiveness of our information and cyber security infrastructure, policies, procedures, and capabilities is crucial to protect our systems and data. Despite our protective measures, including advanced security technology, our systems may still be vulnerable to unauthorized access, supply chain attacks, computer viruses, and other security threats, such as cybercriminal attacks (e.g., phishing and ransomware). These threats could significantly harm our operations, our ability to service our clients and our reputation.
We also take precautions to password-protect and encrypt our laptops and other mobile devices. However, if these devices are stolen, misplaced, or left unattended, they could be hacked or used without authorization, posing a security risk and potentially leading to costly consequences.
Although we have a robust cybersecurity infrastructure and incident preparedness strategy that we test frequently, we may not always respond quickly enough to a cyber incident. Any delay in response could damage our reputation, lead to litigation and regulatory scrutiny, and incur significant remediation costs. For more details see "Cybersecurity" in Item 1C.
Climate change and other unpredictable events, including outbreak of infectious disease, natural disaster, dangerous weather conditions, technology failure, terrorist attack and political unrest, may adversely affect our ability to conduct business.
War, terrorist attacks, political unrest, power failures, climate change, natural disasters, and pandemics (such as COVID-19) could disrupt our operations by:
•decreasing investor confidence and making investment products less attractive;
•causing loss of life;
•triggering technology failures or delays;
•breaching our information and cyber security infrastructure; and
•requiring substantial capital expenditures and operating expenses to remediate damage and restore operations.
Climate change may increase the severity and frequency of disasters, affect our investment portfolio, and influence investor sentiment. It may also lead to regulatory changes impacting the companies in which we invest.
Despite our contingency plans, including system security measures, information backup, and disaster recovery processes, disruptions in infrastructure (electrical, communications, transportation) in key business centers (Nashville, New York City, San Antonio, London, Hong Kong, and India) could adversely affect our operations. If employees cannot access offices or communicate and travel, our business with clients may suffer, and contingency plans may fail.
Unauthorized access, system failures, or data loss could lead to legal proceedings, regulatory penalties, operational disruptions, and reputational damage. Loss of experienced staff or inadequate work facilities could also disrupt operations, affecting our financial condition and business prospects. Our property and business interruption insurance may not cover all potential losses.
Our own operational failures or those of third parties on which we rely, including failures arising out of human error, could disrupt our business, damage our reputation and reduce our revenues.
Weaknesses or failures in our internal processes or systems could disrupt operations, lead to client liability, disciplinary action, or harm our reputation. Our business relies on processing large, complex transactions daily across diverse markets, adhering to client guidelines and regulatory standards.
We must exercise skill, care, and prudence in our services. Despite our highly trained employees, the volume of transactions makes occasional errors likely. If a mistake causes financial harm to a client, we must promptly rectify it. Significant errors can materially affect our reputation, operations, and business prospects.
The individuals and third-party vendors on whom we rely to perform services for us or our clients may be unable or unwilling to honor their contractual obligations to us.
We rely on various counterparties and third-party vendors to enhance our investment, operational, financial, and technological capabilities. However, using third-party vendors does not diminish our responsibility to meet client and regulatory obligations. During market stress, default rates, credit downgrades, and collateral valuation disputes can increase significantly.
Table of Contents
Part I
Financial market disruptions and economic challenges may cause our counterparties and vendors to face cash flow problems or insolvency, leading to significant costs and impairing our business operations. Weaknesses or failures in a vendor's processes, systems, or business continuity plans can disrupt our operations.
Additionally, vendors may lack the infrastructure to safeguard our confidential data effectively. If we cannot manage the risks associated with third-party relationships, we may face fines, disciplinary action, and reputational damage.
We may not always successfully manage actual and potential conflicts of interest that arise in our business.
We must increasingly manage actual and potential conflicts of interest, including situations where our services to one client may conflict with another's interests. Failure to address these conflicts adequately could harm our reputation, operations, and business prospects. We have procedures and controls to identify and mitigate conflicts, including preventing improper information sharing. However, managing conflicts is complex. If we fail, or appear to fail, in handling conflicts appropriately, our reputation could suffer, and clients may be less willing to engage with us. Additionally, potential or perceived conflicts could lead to litigation or regulatory enforcement actions.
Maintaining adequate liquidity for our general business needs depends on certain factors, including operating cash flows and our access to credit on reasonable terms.
Our financial condition depends on cash flow from operations, which is influenced by capital market performance, our ability to maintain and grow AUM, and other factors beyond our control. Adverse market conditions, profitability, perceived creditworthiness, and changes in government regulations, including tax and interest rates, may limit our ability to issue debt on reasonable terms. Our access to credit also depends on our firm's credit ratings.
In 2024, Moody’s and Standard & Poor's affirmed our long-term and short-term credit ratings with a stable outlook. However, future downgrades could increase borrowing costs and limit capital market access, potentially leading to unanticipated costs or revised strategic plans, adversely affecting our financial condition, operations, and business prospects.
An impairment of goodwill may occur.
Determining goodwill impairment requires significant management judgment. Prolonged depressed securities valuations, deteriorating market conditions, or significant net redemptions can adversely affect our AUM, revenues, profitability, and unit price. Although the AB Holding Unit price is one factor in fair value calculation, significant declines make it harder to conclude that fair value exceeds carrying value.
Economic conditions also impact control premiums, industry earnings multiples, and discount rates, potentially leading to more frequent impairment tests based on negative assumptions and future cash flow projections. This could result in a material charge to our earnings. For more information on our impairment testing, see Item 7.
The insurance that we purchase may not fully cover all potential exposures.
We maintain various types of insurance, including professional liability, errors & omissions, fidelity, cyber, property, casualty, and business interruption. However, this insurance may not cover all business risks and is subject to exclusions, limitations, high deductibles, and maximum limits. Some types of insurance may not always be available on commercially acceptable terms or at all. We cannot guarantee that claims will be covered by our policies, will not exceed our coverage, or that insurers will remain solvent. Future coverage may not be obtainable at current levels, and premiums may increase significantly. Additionally, if our affiliates exclude us from joint insurance arrangements, we may need to secure stand-alone coverage with potentially less favorable terms and higher costs.
Legal and Regulatory-related Risks
Our business is subject to pervasive, complex and continuously evolving global regulation, compliance with which involves substantial expenditures of time and money, and violation of which may result in material adverse consequences.
Our business is subject to federal and state laws, securities regulations, exchange rules, and foreign jurisdiction laws. Violations could result in civil or criminal liability, sanctions, license or registration revocation, fines, or business suspension. Such outcomes could materially affect our financial condition, operations, and business prospects. Even without a finding of wrongdoing, regulatory proceedings could require significant time and money and potentially damage our reputation.
Global regulators have increased oversight of financial services, impacting our business with new and proposed regulations, especially in investment management. Compliance has also become more expensive and time-consuming. For example, regulatory focus on ESG practices remains significant. The SEC continues to scrutinize ESG investment labeling to prevent misleading claims. Privacy regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") in Europe have strengthened privacy rules for organizations handling personal data, granting individuals more rights and control over the use of their personal data, and greatly increasing penalties for noncompliance. In many other jurisdictions in which our subsidiaries operate, there is ongoing change to update and strengthen privacy regulations in a manner similar to GDPR, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act and California Privacy Rights Act, and India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act.
22 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part I
The European Commission's (the "EU") action plan and the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation also impose increased restrictions, disclosure obligations, and compliance costs, with potential reputational risks. In Taiwan, the Financial Supervisory Commission implemented limits on local ownership of offshore investment products in 2015. While we have had exemptions, losing them could force local investors to redeem their investments in our funds, significantly reducing our advisory fees and revenues.
Our fund management company (“FMC”) operations in China are subject to a number of regulatory risks, created by an opaque political system evolving regulatory environment and complex data security and data transfer regulations. Foreign governments like China could retaliate against businesses like ours for decisions made by the US government in areas like sanctions and tariffs. China's cybersecurity laws and regulations can be complex and may require companies to store data locally. Restrictions on transfers of certain types of onshore entity business information also may limit our ability to aggregate, report, and monitor such data on our global platform. These factors may increase compliance risk and costs, including the possibility that a breach of local regulation could result in penalties, fines and the revocation of our FMC license.
We are involved in various legal proceedings and regulatory matters and may be involved in such proceedings in the future, any one or combination of which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.
We are involved in various regulatory inquiries, administrative proceedings, and litigation, some alleging significant damages, with potential for future involvement in additional matters. Litigation carries significant uncertainties, particularly when plaintiffs allege substantial or indeterminate damages, the litigation is in its early stages, or when the litigation is highly complex or broad in scope.
Structure-related Risks
The partnership structure of AB Holding and AB limits Unitholders’ abilities to influence the management and operation of AB’s business and is highly likely to prevent a change in control of AB Holding and AB.
The General Partner has exclusive authority to manage and operate AB Holding and AB, unless otherwise stated in their Amended and Restated Partnership Agreements. AB Holding and AB Unitholders have limited voting rights compared to corporate common stockholders. Unitholders cannot vote for directors of the General Partner and can only vote on certain extraordinary matters, including the removal of the General Partner under specific circumstances. The AB Partnership Agreement also restricts the transfer of AB Units and effectively prevents the removal of the General Partner, making a change in control of AB’s management highly unlikely.
AB Units are illiquid and subject to significant transfer restrictions.
There is no public trading market for AB Units, and we do not expect one to develop. The AB Partnership Agreement restricts participation in a public trading market to avoid classification as a "publicly traded partnership" (“PTP”) under Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), rendering any such transfer void. AB Units also face significant transfer restrictions, requiring written consent from EQH and the General Partner. Transfers that risk AB being treated as a corporation for tax purposes are generally not permitted. EQH and the General Partner have a transfer program that requires sellers to find buyers and imposes annual volume restrictions. You can request a copy of the transfer program from our Corporate Secretary or find it as Exhibit 10.07 in this Form 10-K.
Changes in the treatment of AB Holding and AB as partnerships for tax purposes would have significant tax ramifications.
AB Holding has elected to be taxed as a PTP under Section 7704(g) of the Internal Revenue Code, with a 3.5% federal tax on its gross income from active business. To maintain its PTP status, AB Holding cannot directly or indirectly (through AB) enter into a substantial new line of business. A new line of business is defined as one not closely related to AB’s historical activities, and it becomes substantial if it generates more than 15% of the partnership's gross income or uses more than 15% of its assets (by value).
Additionally, AB Units must not be considered publicly traded to maintain AB’s status as a private partnership for tax purposes. If AB Holding or AB were taxed as a corporation, Unitholders would face double taxation: first at the corporate level, then on dividends received.
Both AB Holding and AB are subject to a 4.0% New York City unincorporated business tax ("UBT"), with AB Holding able to offset UBT credits paid by AB. There are no assurances that AB Holding will remain a PTP or continue to receive the current tax benefits associated with being a PTP.
Changes in tax law governing us or an increase in business activities outside the U.S. could have a material impact on us.
Legislative proposals, if enacted, could materially affect us, but their outcomes are unpredictable. AB management is monitoring potential impacts of new legislation. AB's non-U.S. subsidiaries are subject to local taxes. Increased operations abroad or changes in foreign tax laws or rates could raise AB's effective tax rate.
Table of Contents
Part I
If any audit by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") of our income tax returns for any of our taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 results in any adjustments, the IRS may collect any resulting taxes, including any applicable penalties and interest, directly from us, in which case our net income and the cash available for quarterly Unitholder distributions may be substantially reduced.
For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, a "partnership representative" that we designate (a “Partnership Representative”) has sole authority to act on our behalf in IRS audits and similar state or local audits. Actions taken by the Partnership Representative will be binding on us and our Unitholders.
In an audit of a partnership's taxable years starting after December 31, 2017, the IRS typically adjusts at the partnership level in the year the audit is resolved. We may collect any resulting tax liability (and related interest or penalties) from Unitholders based on their percentage interests, but there is no guarantee we will do so. If we do not collect this tax liability from our Unitholders, our net income and available cash for quarterly distributions could decrease. As a result, current Unitholders may bear some or all of the tax liability, even if they did not own Units during the audited year.
Additionally, we may request adjustments to passive losses from certain audits, which could reduce suspended passive loss carryovers.
We may also make a “push-out” election, which would require our Unitholders to account for audit adjustments on their tax returns. This may require Unitholders to provide certain information to us, including details about beneficial owners. However, we are not required to make this election and may be unable or unwilling to do so. If we do not make the push-out election, we would have to pay any taxes resulting from the adjustments, which would reduce the cash available for distribution to Unitholders.
Non-U.S. unitholders may be subject to withholding tax on the sale of their AB Units or AB Holding Units, as well as on distributions, and we may be liable for any under-withholding.
Gain or loss from the sale or exchange of a partnership unit by a non-U.S. unitholder is treated as effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business and subject to U.S. federal income tax if the non-U.S. unitholder would have had effectively connected gain or loss on a hypothetical sale of the partnership's assets at fair market value. A transferee must withhold 10% of the amount realized on the transfer unless an exception applies.
Distributions by a PTP to a non-U.S. unitholder are also subject to U.S. withholding tax if the PTP has effectively connected gross income, gain, or loss. A transferee is not required to withhold tax if it relies on a certification from the transferor or the partnership that an exception applies. If a transferee fails to withhold when required, AB must withhold on distributions to the transferee to cover the liability.
A broker is not required to withhold on the transfer of a PTP interest or on a PTP distribution if the PTP certifies that the "10% exception" applies. This exception applies if the PTP was not engaged in a U.S. trade or business during a specified period, or if a hypothetical sale of the PTP's assets would result in less than 10% of the total net gain being effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business, or no gain would be effectively connected. To certify this, the PTP must issue a "qualified notice" indicating it qualifies for the exception, which we have done and will continue to do. The notice must state the distribution amounts attributable to each income group specified in the Treasury Regulations, be posted on the PTP's primary public website for 10 years, and be delivered to any registered nominee holder. A broker cannot rely on the certification if it knows it is incorrect or unreliable.
As a PTP, AB Holding may be liable for any under-withholding by a broker relying on a qualified notice if we fail to make a reasonable estimate of the amounts required for the 10% exception.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Neither AB nor AB Holding has unresolved comments from the staff of the SEC to report.
Item 1C. Cybersecurity
Cyber Risk Management and Strategy
Through a combination of security, risk and compliance resources, AB implements information security through a dedicated Information Security Program ("ISP") that is intended to identify, assess and manage material risks from cybersecurity threats and which includes a focus on safeguarding information and assets from cyber threats, engaging in cyber threat monitoring and responding to actual or potential cyber incidents. Our ISP is led by our Chief Information Security Officer ("CISO") who actively partners with our Chief Compliance Officer ("CCO") and Chief Risk Officer "("CRO"). Ultimately, our ISP is part of our full enterprise risk framework, which includes information technology, business continuity and resiliency, in addition to cybersecurity risk. Our ISP is coordinated with our broader risk management team, including our Chief Security Officer. Enterprise risk, including cybersecurity risk, is overseen by the Audit and Risk Committee on behalf of the Board.
24 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part I
Our CISO, with assistance from internal and external resources, is responsible for implementing and providing oversight of our ISP. The ISP employs a defense-in-depth strategy: an information assurance concept in which multiple layers of security controls are distributed throughout an operating environment. The defense-in-depth strategy manages risk with diverse defensive strategies, so that if one layer of defense fails, another layer of defense will attempt to compensate. Our ISP features cybersecurity policies, standards and guidelines, committee governance, training, access controls and data controls. We periodically execute table top exercises as a part of our ISP program.
Our ISP, together with our risk and compliance resources, proactively manage the risk of threat from cybersecurity incidents through (i) implementing protocols to take cybersecurity considerations into account in adopting and onboarding our technology resources, (ii) monitoring IT controls to better ensure compliance with cybersecurity and other related legal and regulatory requirements, (iii) periodically assessing adherence by critical and material third parties we partner with to ensure that the appropriate risk management standards are met, (iv) essential business functions remaining available during a business disruption, and (v) regularly developing and updating response plans to address potential IT or cyber incidents should they occur. We also maintain an operational security function that has a real time response capability that triages potential incidents and triggers, as appropriate, impact mitigation protocols. Additionally, we utilize third parties to conduct periodic cybersecurity assessments to identify, assess, manage, and as appropriate, mitigate and respond to cybersecurity risks, and our internal audit function includes certain cyber risk audits as part of its overall risk audit. Our cybersecurity processes rely predominantly on internal resources, but also include important third party resources for certain matters, including the aforementioned assessments as well as our continuous cybersecurity threat monitoring and initial incident reporting system.
As part of our ISP, we also perform cyber risk assessments on our third party vendors where we deem appropriate based on our risk assessment of such vendors, then periodically thereafter.
As of the date of this report, the Company is not aware of any cybersecurity threats that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be materially affected by such risks. See Item 1A Risk Factors - Operations, Technology and Cyber-Related Risks for a discussion of cybersecurity risks.
Cyber Risk Governance
The Audit and Risk Committee is responsible for assisting the Board with oversight of our enterprise risk framework, including cybersecurity, information security, information technology and business continuity and resiliency. Our CISO and other members of senior management including our General Counsel, CCO and CRO report quarterly to the Audit and Risk Committee at its regular meetings on the status of the Company's cybersecurity risk, risk management policies and risk assessment initiatives. The full Board is updated on an as needed basis. In addition, management updates the Audit and Risk Committee, as appropriate, regarding any material cybersecurity threats or incidents, as well as any incidents with lesser impact potential.
While our Board provides oversight of our cybersecurity risk environment, the ultimate responsibility for our processes for identifying, assessing and managing cybersecurity risks resides with management.Our CISO, with assistance from internal and external resources, is responsible for the implementation and providing oversight to our ISP within the organization and maintaining the appropriate level of expertise to manage and implement cybersecurity policies, programs and strategies. Our CISO has years of applied experience in actively managing cybersecurity and information security programs for large global publicly traded companies with complex and evolving information systems. Management oversight of our ISP is provided by various governance committees including the Operational Risk Oversight Committee, the Information Security Risk Oversight Subcommittee and the Financial Crimes Control Oversight Subcommittee.
Table of Contents
Part I
Item 2. Properties
Our headquarters is located at 501 Commerce Street, Nashville, Tennessee. We occupy approximately 219,000 square feet of space under a 15-year lease expiring in 2036.
During the second half of 2024, our lease at our other principal location, 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York expired. At this location, we leased approximately 1,000,000 square feet of space, within which we occupied approximately fifty percent of the space and sublet the other fifty percent. Also, we entered into a 20-year lease agreement in New York, New York, at 66 Hudson Boulevard, for approximately 166,000 square feet that commenced in January 2024 which is now our other principal location in New York.
We also lease approximately 51,000 square feet of space in San Antonio, Texas under a lease expiring in 2029.
Additionally, we lease approximately 100,000 square feet of space in Pune, India. Approximately 48,000 square feet is under a lease expiring in 2032 with the remaining 52,000 square feet under a lease expiring in 2033.
We lease more modest amounts of space in 27 other cities in the United States.
Our subsidiaries lease space in 32 cities outside the United States, the most significant of which is a lease in London, England, expiring in 2031, and in Hong Kong, China, under a lease expiring in 2027. In London we currently lease approximately 68,000 square feet of space of which 28,000 is sublet to our unconsolidated joint venture. In Hong Kong, we currently lease and occupy approximately 36,000 square feet of space.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Legal Proceedings
For significant litigation matters, we assess the likelihood of a negative outcome. If a negative outcome is probable and the loss can be reasonably estimated, we record an estimated loss. If a negative outcome is reasonably possible and we can estimate the potential loss or range of loss beyond any amounts already accrued, we disclose this information. However, predicting outcomes or estimating losses is often challenging due to litigation uncertainties, especially in early stages or complex cases. In such instances, we disclose our inability to predict the outcome or estimate losses.
AB may face regulatory inquiries, administrative proceedings, and litigation, some alleging significant damages. While it is possible we could incur losses from these matters, we cannot currently estimate such losses or their range. Management, after consulting with legal counsel, believes that the outcome of any individual or combined matters will not materially affect our operations, financial condition, or liquidity. However, due to inherent uncertainties, future developments could potentially have a material adverse effect on our results, financial condition, or liquidity in future reporting periods.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
26 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market for AB Holding Units and AB Units; Cash Distributions
AB Holding Units are listed on the NYSE and trade publicly under the ticker symbol “AB". There is no established public trading market for AB Units, which are subject to significant restrictions on transfer. For information about these transfer restrictions, see “Structure-related Risks” in Item 1A.
AB Holding’s principal source of income and cash flow is attributable to its limited partnership interests in AB.
Each of AB Holding and AB distributes on a quarterly basis all of its Available Cash Flow, as defined in the AB Holding Partnership Agreement and the AB Partnership Agreement, respectively, to its Unitholders and the General Partner. For additional information concerning distribution of Available Cash Flow by AB Holding, see Note 2 to AB Holding’s financial statements in Item 8. For additional information concerning distribution of Available Cash Flow by AB, see Note 2 to AB’s consolidated financial statements in Item 8.
On December 31, 2024 (the last trading day of the year), the closing price of an AB Holding Unit on the NYSE was $37.09 per Unit. On December 31, 2024, there were (i) 822 AB Holding Unitholders of record for approximately 110,000 beneficial owners, and (ii) 362 AB Unitholders of record (we do not believe there are substantial additional beneficial owners).
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities
We did not engage in any unregistered sales of our securities during the year ended December 31, 2024, except as previously disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 19, 2024 in connection with the master exchange agreement and purchase agreement entered into with EQH.
We did not engage in any unregistered sales of our equity securities during the year ended December 31, 2023.
We did not engage in any unregistered sales of our securities during the year ended December 31, 2022 except as previously disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 1, 2022 in connection with the acquisition of CarVal Investors L.P.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
Each quarter, AB considers whether to implement a plan to repurchase AB Holding Units pursuant to Rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the Exchange Act. We did not adopt a plan during the fourth quarter of 2024. AB may adopt additional plans in the future to engage in open-market purchases of AB Holding Units to help fund anticipated obligations under the firm’s incentive compensation award program and for other corporate purposes. For additional information about Rule 10b5-1 plans, see “Units Outstanding” in Item 7.
Table of Contents
Part II
AB Holding Units bought by us or one of our affiliates during the fourth quarter of 2024 are as follows:
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(1)During the fourth quarter of 2024, AB retained from employees 2,329,963 AB Holding Units to allow them to fulfill statutory withholding tax requirements at the time of distribution of long-term incentive compensation awards.
(2)Includes 5,211,194 AB Holding Units retired in connection with a master exchange agreement entered into with EQH on December 19, 2024. As the exchange was undertaken on a unit for unit basis and not for cash consideration, there is no purchase price reflected. See Exhibit 10.32 to this Form 10-K.
28 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
Item 6. [Reserved]
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Executive Overview(1)
Our total Assets Under Management ("AUM") as of December 31, 2024 were $792.2 billion, up $67.0 billion, or 9.2%, during 2024. The increase was primarily driven by market appreciation of $68.5 billion, partially offset by net outflows of $2.2 billion (reflecting Institutional net outflows of $16.5 billion, offset by Retail net inflows of $13.4 billion and Private Wealth Management net inflows of $0.9 billion).
Institutional AUM increased $4.3 billion, or 1.3%, to $321.4 billion during 2024, primarily due to market appreciation of $20.7 billion, partially offset by net outflows of $16.5 billion. Gross sales increased $1.2 billion, from $11.8 billion in 2023 to $13.0 billion in 2024. Redemptions and terminations increased $2.3 billion, from $12.6 billion in 2023 to $14.9 billion in 2024.
Retail AUM increased $47.5 billion, or 16.6%, to $334.3 billion during 2024, primarily due to market appreciation of $34.2 billion and net inflows of $13.4 billion. Gross sales increased $28.8 billion, from $71.1 billion in 2023 to $99.9 billion in 2024. Redemptions and terminations increased $13.6 billion, from $58.1 billion in 2023 to $71.7 billion in 2024.
Private Wealth Management AUM increased $15.2 billion, or 12.6%, to $136.5 billion during 2024, primarily due to market appreciation of $13.6 billion and net inflows of $0.9 billion. Gross sales increased $2.2 billion, from $18.6 billion in 2023 to $20.8 billion in 2024. Redemptions and terminations increased $2.4 billion, from $17.5 billion in 2023 to $19.9 billion in 2024.
Bernstein Research Services ("BRS") revenue decreased $289.9 million, or 75.1%, during 2024. The decrease was due to the deconsolidation of the BRS business and contribution of the business to the joint ventures, effective April 1, 2024. For further discussion, see Note 24 Divestitures to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8.
Our 2024 net revenues of $4.5 billion increased $319.8 million, or 7.7%, compared to net revenues of $4.2 billion in the prior year. The increase was primarily due to higher investment advisory base fees of $340.6 million, higher distribution revenues of $140.4 million, higher performance-based fees of $126.1 million and higher other revenues of $41.6 million primarily due certain reimbursements for services provided to the joint ventures, partially offset by lower Bernstein Research Services revenue of $289.9 million due to the deconsolidation of the BRS business, investment losses as compared to gains in the prior year of $27.7 million and lower net dividend and interest income of $11.1 million.
Our operating expenses of $3.4 billion increased $13.4 million, or 0.4%, compared to operating expenses of $3.3 billion in the prior year. The increase was primarily due to higher promotion and servicing expense of $119.7 million, higher employee compensation and benefits expense of $32.6 million and higher general and administrative expenses of $17.6 million, partially offset by higher gain on contingent payment arrangements of $144.7 million and lower interest on borrowings of $10.9 million. The change in contingent payment arrangements was primarily due to the recognition of a gain of $128.5 million related to a fair value remeasurement of the contingent payment liability associated with our acquisition of AB CarVal in 2022.
Our operating income increased $306.4 million, or 37.5%, to $1.1 billion from $817.7 million in 2023 and our operating margin increased to 24.7% in 2024 from 19.1% in 2023.
Market Environment
U.S. Equities
Despite a volatile quarter for U.S. Equities, the S&P 500 ended 2% higher in the fourth quarter of 2024, rounding out a 25% total annual return. Shares were buoyed by expectations that the new federal administration’s policies will lift growth, lower taxes, and ease regulation over the next four years. The Federal Reserve ("Fed") lowered interest rates in both November and December. However, in December the Fed scaled back expectations for rate cuts in 2025, on account of persistent inflation and a robust labor market, triggering a market sell-off particularly in Small Cap (market capitalization between $250 million and $2 billion) with the Russell 2000 giving up earlier gains to end flat in the fourth quarter of 2024. Large Cap growth companies (market capitalization above $10 billion) continued to outperform throughout the quarter and the year. The S&P 500 Growth index returned 36% in 2024 vs. 12% for the S&P 500 Value and 12% for the Russell 2000.
1 Percentage change figures are calculated using assets under management rounded to the nearest million, while financial statement amounts are rounded to the nearest hundred thousand.
Table of Contents
Part II
Global and Non-U.S. Equities
Eurozone equities declined in the fourth quarter of 2024, with the MSCI European Economic and Monetary Union Index returning negative 1.8% (gross returns, in local-currency terms) amid fears of a recession and political turmoil in France and Germany. The European Central Bank signaled more cuts to come in 2025, as the single currency area wrestles with lackluster growth. The UK MSCI Index was roughly flat in local currency terms and returned negative 7% in USD terms, reflecting rapid GBP depreciation amid a rise in long-term bond yields and growing concerns about the U.K. macro-economic outlook. In Japan, equity markets gained in the fourth quarter with the TOPIX returning 5.4%. The Bank of Japan decided not to raise interest rates at its December policy meeting. MSCI Asia ex-Japan ended negative 7% (USD terms) during the fourth quarter of 2024, reflecting investor concerns around the impact of proposed tariffs, particularly on China. Emerging Markets underperformed Developed Markets in the fourth quarter.
Global Bonds
Fixed income markets experienced considerable volatility in the fourth quarter of 2024, primarily driven by geopolitical tensions, central bank decisions, and fluctuating inflation rates. The Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond index ended 5.0% lower (USD terms, unhedged) in the fourth quarter of 2024. Major government bonds sold off, driven by persistent inflation, political instability, and budgetary concerns. The 10-year Treasury yield experienced a notable rise, finishing the year at 4.6%, indicating market uncertainty regarding the Fed's future actions amidst rising expectations over potential inflationary policies implemented by the new federal administration. On the credit front, high yield bonds outperformed their investment-grade counterparts during the fourth quarter, driven by expectations of pro-business policies under the new federal administration.
Relationship with EQH and its Subsidiaries
EQH (our parent company) and its subsidiaries are our largest client. EQH is collaborating with AB in order to improve the risk-adjusted yield for the General Accounts of EQH's insurance subsidiaries by investing additional assets at AB, including the utilization of AB's higher-fee, longer-duration alternative offerings. In mid-2021, Equitable Financial Life Insurance Company, a subsidiary of EQH ("Equitable Financial"), agreed to provide an initial $10 billion in permanent capital to build out AB's private illiquid offerings, including private alternatives and private placements. Deployment of the initial $10 billion in permanent capital is now complete. In addition, during the second quarter of 2023, EQH committed to provide an additional $10 billion in permanent capital, deployment of which is approximately 20% complete. We expect this anticipated capital from EQH's insurance subsidiaries will continue to accelerate both organic and inorganic growth in our private alternatives business, allowing us to continue to deliver for our clients, employees, unitholders and other stakeholders. For example, included in the initial $10 billion commitment by EQH is $750 million in capital deployed through AB CarVal.
Permanent capital means investment capital of indefinite duration, for which commitments may be withdrawn under certain conditions. Such conditions primarily include potential regulatory restrictions, lacking sufficient liquidity to fund the capital commitments to AB and AB's inability to identify attractive investment opportunities which align with the investment strategy. Although EQH’s insurance subsidiaries have indicated their intention over time to provide this investment capital to AB, they have no binding commitment to do so. While the withdrawal of their commitment could potentially slow down our introduction of certain products, the impact to our overall operations would not be material.
Joint Venture with Societe Generale
Effective April 1, 2024, AB and Societe Generale ("SocGen") completed their previously announced transaction to form a global joint venture with two joint venture holding companies, one outside of North America and one within North America ("NA JV", and together the "JVs"). AB owns a majority interest in the NA JV while SocGen owns a majority interest in the joint venture outside of North America. AB has deconsolidated the BRS business and retained the Bernstein Private Wealth Management business within its existing U.S. broker dealer Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., LLC. For further discussion, see Note 24 Divestitures to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8.
Relocation Strategy
As previously announced, we have established our corporate headquarters in Nashville, TN, at 501 Commerce Street. Our Nashville headquarters houses Finance, IT, Operations, Legal, Compliance, Internal Audit, Human Capital, and Sales and Marketing and at year-end 2024, we had 1,063 employees in Nashville. We will continue to maintain a principal location in New York City, which houses our Portfolio Management and Trading, and New York-based Private Wealth Management businesses.
We believe relocating our corporate headquarters to Nashville affords us the opportunity to provide an improved quality of life alternative for our employees and enables us to attract and recruit new talented employees to a highly desirable location while improving the long-term cost structure of the firm.
As of December 31, 2024, we have successfully completed the relocation of our corporate headquarters to Nashville, TN.
During the transition period, which began in 2018 and was completed in the fourth quarter of 2024, we incurred $160 million of cumulative transition costs. These costs include employee relocation, severance, recruitment, and overlapping compensation and occupancy costs. Over this same period, we realized total cumulative expense savings of $218 million, resulting in an overall net savings of $58 million for the period.
30 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
We incurred $20 million of transition costs for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, compared to $43 million of expense savings, resulting in an overall net savings of $23 million for the period. In 2024, our net income per unit ("EPU") increased $0.08 as a result of our relocation strategy, which compares to the $0.08 EPU increase that occurred in 2023. We also expect to achieve EPU accretion in each future year. Beginning in 2025, as the transition period has now been completed, we estimate ongoing annual expense savings of approximately $75 million, which will result from a combination of occupancy and compensation-related savings.
During October 2018, we signed a lease, which commenced in the fourth quarter of 2020, relating to 218,976 square feet of space at our new Nashville headquarters. Our estimated total base rent obligation (excluding taxes, operating expenses and utilities) over the 15-year initial lease term is $134 million.
While we have completed the transition period associated with our headquarter relocation to Nashville and our transition costs, expense savings and favorable EPU impact were in line with our estimates, there are several remaining positions to be relocated. We believe that any additional transition costs and expense savings will be immaterial. The actual outcomes may differ due to deviations in one or more of our key assumptions. The remaining transition costs and expense savings, along with their underlying assumptions, are considered Forward-Looking Statements. These statements were subject to various factors discussed in the "Risk Factors" and "Cautions Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" sections of this 2024 10-K.
AB Holding
AB Holding’s principal source of income and cash flow is attributable to its investment in AB Units. The AB Holding financial statements, notes to the financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with those of AB.
Results of Operations
Years Ended December 31 % Change
(in thousands, except per unit amounts)
Weighted average equity ownership interest 39.4 % 39.2 % 36.7 %
(1)Distributions reflect the impact of AB’s non-GAAP adjustments.
AB Holding had net income of $423.4 million in 2024 compared to $264.2 million in 2023, reflecting higher net income attributable to AB Unitholders and higher weighted average equity ownership interest. AB Holding had net income of $264.2 million in 2023 compared to $274.2 million in 2022, reflecting lower net income attributable to AB Unitholders, partially offset by higher weighted average equity ownership interest.
AB Holding's partnership gross income is derived from its interest in AB. AB Holding’s income taxes, which reflect a 3.5% federal tax on its partnership gross income from the active conduct of a trade or business, are computed by multiplying certain AB qualifying revenues by AB Holding’s ownership interest in AB, multiplied by the 3.5% tax rate. Certain AB qualifying revenues are primarily U.S. investment advisory fees, research payments and brokerage commissions. AB Holding’s effective tax rate was 8.4% in 2024, 11.9% in 2023 and 10.3% in 2022. The decrease in AB Holdings effective tax rate is primarily driven by one-time items not subject to the gross revenue tax. See Note 6 to AB Holding’s financial statements in Item 8for a further description.
As supplemental information, AB provides the performance measures “adjusted net revenues,” “adjusted operating income” and “adjusted operating margin,” which are additional metrics management uses in evaluating and comparing the period-to-period operating performance of AB. Management uses these additional metrics in evaluating performance because they present a clearer picture of AB's operating performance and allow management to see long-term trends without the distortion primarily caused by long-term incentive compensation-related mark-to-market adjustments, acquisition-related expenses, interest expense and other adjustment items. Similarly, management believes that these management operating metrics help investors better understand the underlying trends in AB's results and, accordingly, provide a valuable perspective for investors. Such measures are not based on generally accepted accounting principles (“non-GAAP measures”).
Table of Contents
Part II
We provide the non-GAAP measures "adjusted net income" and "adjusted diluted net income per unit" because our quarterly distribution per unit is typically our adjusted diluted net income per unit (which is derived from adjusted net income).
These non-GAAP measures are provided in addition to, and not as substitutes for, net revenues, operating income and operating margin, and they may not be comparable to non-GAAP measures presented by other companies. Management uses both GAAP and non-GAAP measures in evaluating the company’s financial performance. The non-GAAP measures alone may pose limitations because they do not include all of AB’s revenues and expenses. Further, adjusted diluted net income per AB Holding Unit is not a liquidity measure and should not be used in place of cash flow measures. See “Management Operating Metrics” in this Item 7.
The impact of these adjustments on AB Holding’s net income and diluted net income per AB Holding Unit are as follows:
Years Ended December 31
(in thousands, except per unit amounts)
AB Income tax (expense) benefit on non-GAAP adjustments 8,338 (2,786) (6,395)
Diluted net income per AB Holding Unit, GAAP basis $ 3.71 $ 2.34 $ 2.69
Impact of AB non-GAAP adjustments (0.46) 0.35 0.25
Adjusted diluted net income per AB Holding Unit $ 3.25 $ 2.69 $ 2.94
(2)Includes all AB non-GAAP adjustments to pre-tax income.
The degree to which AB’s non-GAAP adjustments impact AB Holding’s net income fluctuates based on AB Holding's ownership percentage in AB.
Tax Legislation
For a discussion of tax legislation, see “Risk Factors - Structure-related Risks” in Item 1A.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
During the year ended December 31, 2024, net cash provided by operating activities was $340.5 million, compared to $294.0 million during the corresponding 2023 period. The increase primarily resulted from higher cash distributions received from AB of $47.7 million. During the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash provided by operating activities was $294.0 million, compared to $362.6 million during the corresponding 2022 period. The decrease primarily resulted from lower cash distributions received from AB of $64.6 million.
During the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, net cash used in investing activities was zero, zero and $1.8 million, respectively. In 2022, net cash used in investing activities reflected investments in AB with proceeds from exercises of compensatory options to buy AB Holding Units and capital contributions to AB.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, net cash used in financing activities was $340.5 million, compared to $294.0 million during the corresponding 2023 period. The increase was primarily due to higher cash distributions to Unitholders of $45.1 million and lower capital contributions from AB of $1.4 million. During the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash used in financing activities was $294.0 million, compared to $360.8 million during the corresponding 2022 period. The decrease was primarily due to lower cash distributions to Unitholders of $64.9 million and higher capital contributions from AB of $2.2 million.
Management believes that AB Holding will have the resources it needs to meet its financial obligations as a result of the cash flow AB Holding realizes from its investment in AB. AB Holding’s cash inflow is comprised entirely of distributions from AB. These distributions are subsequently distributed (net of taxes paid) in their entirety to AB Holding’s Unitholders. As a result, AB Holding has no liquidity risk as it only pays distributions to AB Holding’s Unitholders to the extent of distributions received from AB (net of taxes paid).
32 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
Cash Distributions
AB Holding is required to distribute all of its Available Cash Flow, as defined in the AB Holding Partnership Agreement, to its Unitholders (including the General Partner). Available Cash Flow typically is the adjusted diluted net income per unit for the quarter multiplied by the number of units outstanding at the end of the quarter. Management anticipates that Available Cash Flow will continue to be based on adjusted diluted net income per unit, unless management determines, with concurrence of the Board of Directors, that one or more adjustments made to adjusted net income should not be made with respect to the Available Cash Flow calculation. See Note 2 to AB Holding’s financial statements in Item 8 for a description of Available Cash Flow.
Commitments and Contingencies
For a discussion of commitments and contingencies, see Note 7 to AB Holding’s financial statements in Item 8.
AB
Assets Under Management
Assets under management by distribution channel are as follows:
As of December 31 % Change
(in billions)
Assets under management by investment service are as follows:
As of December 31 % Change
(in billions)
Equity
Fixed Income
Actively Managed
Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions(2)(3)
(1)Includes index and enhanced index services.
(2)Includes certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity or fixed income services.
(3)Approximately $12.1 billion of private placements was transferred from Taxable Fixed Income into Alternatives/Multi-Asset during 2024 to better align with standard industry practice for asset class reporting purposes.
Table of Contents
Part II
Changes in assets under management during 2024 and 2023 are as follows:
Distribution Channel
Institutions Retail PrivateWealthManagement Total
(in billions)
Long-term flows:
Cash flow/unreinvested dividends (14.6) (14.8) — (29.4)
Net long-term (outflows) inflows (16.5) 13.4 0.9 (2.2)
Adjustments(1) — — 0.7 0.7
Transfers 0.1 (0.1) — —
Long-term flows:
Cash flow/unreinvested dividends (11.0) (9.3) — (20.3)
Net long-term (outflows) inflows (11.8) 3.7 1.1 (7.0)
Transfers 0.1 (0.1) — —
(1)This adjustment is due to a change in fee policy related to certain fixed income assets effective October 1, 2024.
34 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
Investment Service
(in billions)
Long-term flows:
Long-term flows:
(1)Includes index and enhanced index services.
(2)Includes certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity or fixed income services.
(3)This adjustment is due to a change in fee policy related to certain fixed income assets effective October 1, 2024.
(4)Approximately $12.1 billion of private placements was transferred from Taxable Fixed Income into Alternatives/Multi-Asset during 2024 to better align with standard industry practice for asset class reporting purposes.
Table of Contents
Part II
Net long-term (outflows) inflows for actively managed investment services as compared to passively managed investment services during 2024 and 2023 are as follows:
Years Ended December 31
(in billions)
Actively Managed
Alternatives/Multi- Asset Solutions 3.8 (2.0)
Passively Managed
Fixed Income (1.0) 1.5
Alternatives/Multi- Asset Solutions 1.1 0.7
Total net long-term (outflows) $ (2.2) $ (7.0)
Average assets under management by distribution channel and investment service are as follows:
Years Ended December 31 % Change
(in billions)
Distribution Channel:
Investment Service:
(1)Includes index and enhanced index services.
(2)Includes certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity or fixed income services.
36 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
During 2024, our Institutional channel average AUM of $322.9 billion increased $18.3 billion, or 6.0%, compared to 2023, while ending AUM increased $4.3 billion, or 1.3%, to $321.4 billion from December 31, 2023. The $4.3 billion increase in AUM resulted primarily from market appreciation of $20.7 billion, partially offset by net outflows of $16.5 billion. Market depreciation of $7.6 billion in the fourth quarter of 2024 drove the ending AUM balance down as compared to our average AUM for 2024. During 2023, our Institutional channel average AUM of $304.6 billion decreased $3.8 billion, or 1.2%, compared to 2022, while ending AUM increased $19.8 billion, or 6.7%, to $317.1 billion from December 31, 2022. The $19.8 billion increase in AUM resulted primarily from market appreciation of $31.5 billion (with $22.7 billion of market appreciation occurring in the fourth quarter of 2023), partially offset by net outflows of $11.8 billion.
During 2024, our Retail channel average AUM of $315.3 billion increased $53.3 billion, or 20.4%, compared to 2023, primarily due to this AUM increasing $47.5 billion, or 16.6%, to $334.3 billion from December 31, 2023. The $47.5 billion increase in AUM resulted primarily from market appreciation of $34.2 billion and net inflows of $13.4 billion. During 2023, our Retail channel average AUM of $262.0 billion decreased $5.8 billion, or 2.1%, compared to 2022, while ending AUM increased $43.9 billion, or 18.1%, to $286.8 billion from December 31, 2022. The $43.9 billion increase in AUM resulted primarily from market appreciation of $40.3 billion and net outflows of $3.7 billion.
During 2024, our Private Wealth Management channel average AUM of $130.3 billion increased $16.6 billion, or 14.6%, compared to 2023, primarily due to this AUM increasing $15.2 billion, or 12.6%, to $136.5 billion from December 31, 2023. The $15.2 billion increase in AUM resulted from market appreciation of $13.6 billion, net inflows of $0.9 billion and an adjustment of $0.7 billion. During 2023, our Private Wealth Management channel average AUM of $113.7 billion increased $3.4 billion, or 3.0%, compared to 2022, primarily due to this AUM increasing $15.1 billion, or 14.1%, to $121.3 billion from December 31, 2022. The $15.1 billion increase in AUM resulted from market appreciation of $14.0 billion, and net inflows of $1.1 billion.
Absolute investment composite returns, gross of fees, and relative performance as of December 31, 2024 compared to benchmarks for certain representative Institutional equity and fixed income services are as follows:
1-Year 3-Year(1) 5-Year(1)
Income (fixed income)
Relative return (vs. Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index) 3.01 2.63 1.83
High Income (fixed income)
Global Plus - Hedged (fixed income)
Intermediate Municipal Bonds (fixed income)
Relative return (vs. Lipper Short/Int. Blended Muni Fund Avg) 0.49 0.51 0.67
U.S. Core Plus (fixed income)
Relative return (vs. Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index) 1.49 0.57 0.65
Emerging Market Debt (fixed income)
Relative return (vs. JPM EMBI Global/JPM EMBI) 2.76 0.73 0.78
Table of Contents
Part II
1-Year 3-Year(1) 5-Year(1)
Sustainable Global Thematic
Relative return (vs. MSCI ACWI Index) (10.42) (8.13) (0.13)
International Strategic Core Equity
Relative return (vs. MSCI EAFE Index) 6.00 1.68 0.78
U.S. Small & Mid Cap Value
U.S. Large Cap Value
U.S. Small Cap Growth
U.S. Large Cap Growth
Relative return (vs. Russell 1000 Growth Index) (7.46) (3.45) (2.46)
U.S. Small & Mid Cap Growth
Concentrated U.S. Growth
Select U.S. Equity
Strategic Equities
Global Core Equity
Relative return (vs. MSCI ACWI Index) (6.43) (2.80) (2.56)
U.S. Strategic Core Equity
Select U.S. Equity Long/Short
Global Strategic Core Equity
(1)Reflects annualized returns.
38 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
Consolidated Results of Operations
Years Ended December 31 % Change
(in thousands, except per unit amounts)
Non-operating income 134,555 — — n/m n/m
(1)Operating income excluding net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests as a percentage of net revenues.
Net income attributable to AB Unitholders for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased $408.6 million from the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase primarily is due to (in millions):
Higher base advisory fees $ 340.6
Higher distribution revenues 140.4
Higher gain on divestiture 134.6
Higher gain on contingent payment arrangements (1) 144.7
Higher performance-based fees 126.1
Higher other revenues 41.5
Lower interest expense 10.9
Lower Bernstein Services Research revenues (2) (289.9)
Higher promotion and servicing expenses (119.7)
Higher income tax expense (36.1)
Higher employee compensation and benefits expense (32.6)
Higher investment losses (27.7)
Higher general and administrative expenses (17.6)
Lower net dividend and interest income (11.1)
(1)During 2024, we recognized a gain of $128.5 million in contingent payment arrangements in the consolidated statements of income related to a fair value remeasurement of the contingent payment liability associated with our acquisition of AB Carval in 2022.
(2)On April 1, 2024, AB and SocGen, a leading European bank, completed their transaction to form a jointly owned equity research provider and cash equity trading partner for institutional investors. AB has deconsolidated the BRS business and contributed the business to the JVs. For further discussion, see Note 24 Divestiture to our consolidated financial statements contained in Item 8.
Table of Contents
Part II
Net income attributable to AB Unitholders for the year ended December 31, 2023 decreased $67.2 million from the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease primarily was due to (in millions):
Higher employee compensation and benefits $ (102.5)
Higher interest on borrowings (36.5)
Lower Bernstein Research Services revenue (30.1)
Lower distribution revenues (20.9)
Higher amortization of intangible assets (20.3)
Higher contingent payment arrangements (16.3)
Higher investment gains 116.6
Lower general and administrative expenses 60.1
Higher net dividend and interest income 35.2
Lower promotion and servicing expenses 17.1
Lower income taxes 10.6
Units Outstanding
Each quarter, we consider whether to implement a plan to repurchase AB Holding Units pursuant to Rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). A plan of this type allows a company to repurchase its shares at times when it otherwise might be prevented from doing so because of self-imposed trading blackout periods or because it possesses material non-public information. Each broker we select has the authority to repurchase AB Holding Units on our behalf in accordance with the terms and limitations specified in the plan. Repurchases are subject to regulations promulgated by the SEC, as well as certain price, market volume and timing constraints specified in the plan. We did not adopt a plan during the fourth quarter of 2024. We may adopt additional plans in the future to engage in open-market purchases of AB Holding Units to help fund anticipated obligations under our incentive compensation award program and for other corporate purposes.
Cash Distributions
We are required to distribute all of our Available Cash Flow, as defined in the AB Partnership Agreement, to our Unitholders and the General Partner. Available Cash Flow typically is the adjusted diluted net income per unit for the quarter multiplied by the number of general and limited partnership interests at the end of the quarter. In future periods, management anticipates that Available Cash Flow will continue to be based on adjusted diluted net income per unit, unless management determines, with concurrence of the Board of Directors, that one or more adjustments that are made for adjusted net income should not be made with respect to the Available Cash Flow calculation. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements contained in Item 8 for a description of Available Cash Flow.
Management Operating Metrics
We are providing the non-GAAP measures “adjusted net revenues,” “adjusted operating income” and “adjusted operating margin” because they are additional operating metrics management uses in evaluating and comparing period-to-period operating performance. Management uses these additional metrics in evaluating performance because they present a clearer picture of our operating performance and allow management to see long-term trends without the distortion primarily caused by long-term incentive compensation-related mark-to-market adjustments, acquisition-related expenses, interest expense and other adjustment items. Similarly, we believe that these management operating metrics help investors better understand the underlying trends in our results and, accordingly, provide a valuable perspective for investors.
40 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
These non-GAAP measures are provided in addition to, and not as substitutes for, net revenues, operating income and operating margin, and they may not be comparable to non-GAAP measures presented by other companies. Management uses both accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("US GAAP") and non-GAAP measures in evaluating our financial performance. The non-GAAP measures alone may pose limitations because they do not include all of our revenues and expenses.
Years Ended December 31
(in thousands)
Adjustments:
Distribution-related adjustments:
Pass-through adjustments:
Equity loss on JV 36,611 — —
Adjustments:
Retirement plan settlement loss 13,130 — —
Equity loss on JV 36,611 — —
Non-operating income, US GAAP basis $ 134,555 $ — $ —
Less: Gain on divestiture 134,555 — —
Diluted net income per AB Unit, GAAP basis $ 4.05 $ 2.65 $ 3.01
Impact of non-GAAP adjustments (0.46) 0.35 0.25
Adjusted diluted net income per AB Unit $ 3.59 $ 3.00 $ 3.26
Operating margin, GAAP basis 24.7 % 19.1 % 21.5 %
Impact of non-GAAP adjustments 7.6 9.1 7.4
Adjusted operating margin 32.3 % 28.2 % 28.9 %
Table of Contents
Part II
Adjusted operating income for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased $188.9 million, or 19.9%, from the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to higher investment advisory base fees of $332.6 million, higher performance-based fees of $101.3 million, lower general and administrative expenses of $37.9 million, lower promotion and servicing expenses of $32.5 million, higher investment gains of $10.7 million and higher other revenues of $8.1 million, partially offset by lower Bernstein Research Services revenue of $289.9 million due to the deconsolidation of the BRS business, higher employee compensation and benefits expense of $37.7 million and lower net dividends and interest income of $6.2 million.
Adjusted operating income for the year ended December 31, 2023 decreased $13.9 million, or 1.4%, from the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily due to higher employee compensation and benefits expense of $39.3 million, lower Bernstein Research Services revenue of $30.1 million, lower investment advisory base fees of $25.1 million and higher general and administrative expenses of $6.2 million, partially offset by higher net dividend and interest income of $51.6 million and higher performance-based fees of $35.5 million.
Adjusted Net Revenues
Net Revenue, as adjusted, is reduced to exclude all of the company's distribution revenues, which are recorded as a separate line item on the consolidated statement of income, as well as a portion of investment advisory services fees received that is used to pay distribution and servicing costs. For certain products, based on the distinct arrangements, certain distribution fees are collected by us and passed through to third-party client intermediaries, while for certain other products, we collect investment advisory services fees and a portion is passed through to third-party client intermediaries. In both arrangements, the third-party client intermediary owns the relationship with the client and is responsible for performing services and distributing the product to the client on our behalf. We believe offsetting distribution revenues and certain investment advisory services fees is useful for our investors and other users of our financial statements because such presentation appropriately reflects the nature of these costs as pass-through payments to third parties that perform functions on behalf of our sponsored mutual funds and/or shareholders of these funds. Distribution-related adjustments fluctuate each period based on the type of investment products sold, as well as the average AUM over the period. Also, we adjust distribution revenues for the amortization of deferred sales commissions as these costs, over time, will offset such revenues.
We adjust investment advisory and services fees and other revenues for pass through costs, primarily related to our transfer agent and shareholder servicing fees. Also, we adjust for certain performance-based fees passed through to our investment advisors. These fees do not affect operating income, as such, we exclude these fees from adjusted net revenues. We also adjust for certain pass through costs associated with the transition of services to the JVs entered into with SocGen. These amounts are expensed by us and passed to the JVs for reimbursement. These fees do not affect operating income, as such, we exclude these fees from adjusted net revenues.
We adjust for the revenue impact of consolidating company-sponsored investment funds by eliminating the consolidated company-sponsored investment funds' revenues and including AB's fees from such consolidated company-sponsored investment funds and AB's investment gains and losses on its investments in such consolidated company-sponsored investment funds that were eliminated in consolidation.
We also adjust net revenues to exclude our portion of the equity income or loss associated with our investment in the JVs. Effective April 1, 2024 following the close of the transaction with SocGen, we record all income or loss associated with the JVs as an equity method investment income (loss). As we no longer consider this activity part of our core business operations and our intent is to fully divest from both joint ventures, we consider these amounts temporary, and as such, we exclude these amounts from our adjusted net revenues.
Adjusted net revenues exclude investment gains and losses and dividends and interest on employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments. Also, we adjust for certain acquisition-related pass-through performance-based fees and performance related compensation.
Adjusted Operating Income
Adjusted operating income represents operating income on a US GAAP basis excluding (1) real estate charges (credits), (2) the impact on net revenues and compensation expense of the investment gains and losses (as well as the dividends and interest) associated with employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments, (3) retirement plan settlement loss, (4) the equity compensation paid by EQH to certain AB executives, (5) acquisition-related expenses, (6) equity (income) loss on JVs, (7) interest on borrowings and (8) the impact of consolidated company-sponsored investment funds.
Real estate charges (credits) incurred during the fourth quarter of 2019 through the fourth quarter of 2020, while excluded in the period in which the charges (credits) were recorded, are included ratably over the remaining applicable lease term.
Prior to 2009, a significant portion of employee compensation was in the form of long-term incentive compensation awards that were notionally invested in AB investment services and generally vested over a period of four years. AB economically hedged the exposure to market movements by purchasing and holding these investments on its balance sheet. All such
42 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
investments had vested as of year-end 2012 and the investments have been delivered to the participants, except for those investments with respect to which the participant elected a long-term deferral. Fluctuation in the value of these investments, which also impacts compensation expense, is recorded within investment gains and losses on the income statement. Management believes it is useful to reflect the offset achieved from economically hedging the market exposure of these investments in the calculation of adjusted operating income and adjusted operating margin. The non-GAAP measures exclude gains and losses and dividends and interest on employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments included in revenues and compensation expense.
The losses associated with the termination of our defined benefit retirement plan are non-cash, short term in nature and not considered a part of our core operating results when comparing financial results from period to period.
The board of directors of EQH granted to Seth Bernstein, our CEO, equity awards in connection with EQH's IPO. Additionally, equity awards were granted to Mr. Bernstein and other AB executivesfor their membership on the EQH Management Committee. These individuals may receive additional equity or cash compensation from EQH in the future related to their service on the Management Committee. Any awards granted to these individuals by EQH are recorded as compensation expense in AB’s consolidated statement of income. The compensation expense associated with these awards has been excluded from our non-GAAP measures because they are non-cash and are based upon EQH's, and not AB's, financial performance.
Acquisition-related expenses have been excluded because they are not considered part of our core operating results when comparing financial results from period to period and to industry peers. Acquisition-related expenses include professional fees, the recording of changes in estimates or fair value remeasurements to, and accretion expense related to, our contingent payment arrangements associated with our acquisitions, certain compensation-related expenses and amortization of intangible assets for contracts acquired. During 2024, we recognized a gain of $128.5 million in contingent payment arrangements in the consolidated statement of income related to a fair value remeasurement of the contingent payment liability associated with our acquisition of AB Carval in 2022. The fair value remeasurement was due to updated assumptions of future performance associated with the liability. We also recorded an impairment of $2.5 million of the contingent consideration payable associated with a small acquisition made in 2020 due to the loss of investment management contracts. In addition, we recorded an intangible asset impairment charge of $4.4 million associated with various historical acquisitions. During 2023, we recorded an expense of $28.4 million due to a change in estimate related to the contingent consideration associated with the acquisition of Autonomous LLC in 2019. The change in estimate was based upon better than expected revenues during the 2023 performance evaluation period. We recorded $14.1 million as contingent payment arrangement expense and $14.3 million as compensation and benefits expense in the consolidated statement of income. The charges to compensation and benefits expense are due to certain service conditions and special awards included in the acquisition agreement. During 2022, acquisition related expenses included an intangible asset impairment charge of $5.6 million related to various historical acquisitions.
We also adjust operating income to exclude our portion of the equity income or loss associated with our investment in the JVs. Effective April 1, 2024 following the close of the transaction with SocGen, we record all income or loss associated with the JVs as an equity method investment (income) loss. As we no longer consider this activity part of our core business operations and our intent is to fully divest from both joint ventures, we consider these amounts temporary, and as such, we exclude these amounts from our adjusted operating income.
We adjust operating income to exclude interest on borrowings in order to align with our industry peer group.
Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Diluted Net Income per AB Unit
As previously discussed, our quarterly distribution is typically our adjusted diluted net income per unit (which is derived from adjusted net income) for the quarter multiplied by the number of general and limited partnership interests outstanding at the end of the quarter. Adjusted net income is derived from adjusted operating income less interest expense, gain on divestiture and adjusted income taxes. The gain on divestiture is not considered part of our core operating results and, accordingly has been excluded from our adjusted net income. Adjusted income taxes, used in calculating adjusted net income, are calculated using the GAAP effective tax rate adjusted for non-GAAP income tax adjustments.
Adjusted Operating Margin
Adjusted operating margin allows us to monitor our financial performance and efficiency from period to period without the volatility noted above in our discussion of adjusted operating income and to compare our performance to industry peers on a basis that better reflects our performance in our core business. Adjusted operating margin is derived by dividing adjusted operating income by adjusted net revenues.
Table of Contents
Part II
Net Revenues
The components of net revenues are as follows:
Years Ended December 31 % Change
(in thousands)
Investment advisory and services fees:
Institutions:
Retail:
Private Wealth Management:
Total:
(1)On April 1, 2024, AB and SocGen, a leading European bank, completed their transaction to form a jointly owned equity research provider and cash equity trading partner for institutional investors. AB has deconsolidated the BRS business and contributed the business to the JVs. For further discussion, see Note 24 Divestiture to our consolidated financial statements contained in Item 8.
Investment Advisory and Services Fees
Investment advisory and services fees are the largest component of our revenues. These fees generally are calculated as a percentage of the value of AUM as of a specified date, or as a percentage of the value of average AUM for the applicable billing period, and vary with the type of investment service, the size of account and the total amount of assets we manage for a particular client. Accordingly, fee income generally increases or decreases as AUM increase or decrease and is affected by market appreciation or depreciation, the addition of new client accounts or client contributions of additional assets to existing accounts, withdrawals of assets from and termination of client accounts, purchases and redemptions of mutual fund shares, shifts of assets between accounts or products with different fee structures, and acquisitions. Our average basis points realized (investment advisory and services fees divided by average AUM) generally approximate 30 to 105 basis points for actively managed equity services, 10 to 65 basis points for actively managed fixed income services and 1 to 50 basis points for passively managed services. Average basis points realized for other services could range from 3 basis points for certain Institutional third party managed services to 190 basis points for certain Private Wealth Management alternative services. These ranges include all-inclusive fee arrangements (covering investment management, trade execution and other services) for our Private Wealth Management clients.
44 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
We calculate AUM using established market-based valuation methods and fair valuation (non-observable market) methods. Market-based valuation methods include: last sale/settle prices from an exchange for actively-traded listed equities, options and futures; evaluated bid prices from recognized pricing vendors for fixed income, asset-backed or mortgage-backed issues; mid prices from recognized pricing vendors and brokers for credit default swaps; and quoted bids or spreads from pricing vendors and brokers for other derivative products. Fair valuation methods include: discounted cash flow models or any other methodology that is validated and approved by our Valuation Committee and sub-committee (the "Valuation Committee") (see paragraph immediately below for more information regarding our Valuation Committee). Fair valuation methods are used only where AUM cannot be valued using market-based valuation methods, such as in the case of private equity or illiquid securities.
The Valuation Committee, consists of senior officers and employees, which oversees a consistent framework of pricing and valuation of all investments held in client and AB portfolios. The Valuation Committee has adopted a Statement of Pricing Policies describing principles and policies that apply to pricing and valuing investments held in these portfolios. We also have a Pricing Group, which is overseen by the Valuation Committee and is responsible for managing the pricing process for all investments.
We sometimes charge our clients performance-based fees. In these situations, we charge a base advisory fee and are eligible to earn an additional performance-based fee or incentive allocation that is calculated as either a percentage of absolute investment results or a percentage of investment results in excess of a stated benchmark over a specified period of time. Some performance-based fees include a high-watermark provision, which generally provides that if a client account underperforms relative to its performance target (whether absolute or relative to a specified benchmark), it must gain back such underperformance before we can collect future performance-based fees. Therefore, if we fail to achieve our performance target for a particular period, we will not earn a performance-based fee for that period and, for accounts with a high-watermark provision, our ability to earn future performance-based fees will be impaired. We are eligible to earn performance-based fees on 7.4%, 8.0% and 0.3% of the assets we manage for institutional clients, private wealth clients and retail clients, respectively (in total, 4.5% of our AUM).
Our investment advisory and services fees increased by $466.7 million, or 15.7%, in 2024, due to a $340.6 million, or 12.0%, increase in base fees and a $126.1 million increase in performance-based fees. The increase in base fees is primarily due to a 13.0% increase in average AUM. Our investment advisory and services fees increased by $4.4 million, or 0.1%, in 2023, due to a $4.8 million, or 0.2%, increase in base fees, offset by a $0.3 million decrease in performance-based fees. The increase in base fees was primarily due to slight shift in product mix to alternatives, which generally earn higher fees, partially offset by a 0.9% decrease in average AUM.
Performance-based fees increased $126.1 million, or 87.0%, in 2024, primarily due to higher performance-based fees earned on Financial Services Opportunities fund, Global Opportunistic Credit fund, Global Multi-Strategy fund and US Select Equity Long/Short fund, partially offset by lower performance-based fees earned on International Small Cap fund. Performance-based fees decreased $0.3 million, or 0.2%, in 2023, primarily due to lower performance-based fees earned on U.S. Real Estate fund and Emerging Markets Opportunistic Credit fund, partially offset by higher performance-based fees earned on Private Credit fund, Global Opportunistic Credit fund, Global Multi-Strategy fund and Securitized Assets fund.
Institutional base fees increased $6.9 million, or 1.1%, in 2024, primarily due to a a 6.0% increase in average AUM, partially offset by a lower portfolio fee rate. Retail base fees increased $228.4 million, or 17.9%, in 2024, primarily due to a 20.4% increase in average AUM, partially offset by a lower portfolio fee rate. Private Wealth base fees increased $105.3 million, or 11.2%, in 2024, primarily due to a 14.6% increase in average AUM, partially offset by a lower portfolio fee rate. Institutional base fees increased $30.4 million, or 5.2%, in 2023, primarily due to a higher portfolio fee rate, partially offset by a 1.2% decrease in average AUM. Retail base fees decreased $45.7 million, or 3.5%, in 2023, primarily due to a 2.1% decrease in average AUM. Private Wealth base fees increased $20.1 million, or 2.2%, in 2023, primarily due to a 3.0% increase in average AUM.
Bernstein Research Services
Effective April 1, 2024, AB deconsolidated the BRS business. For further discussion, see Note 24 Divestitures to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8.
Prior to the deconsolidation of the BRS business, we earned revenues for providing investment research to, and executing brokerage transactions for, institutional clients. These clients compensated us principally by directing us to execute brokerage transactions on their behalf, for which we earned commissions, and to a lesser extent, by paying us directly for research through commission sharing agreements or cash payments.
Revenues from Bernstein Research Services decreased $289.9 million, or 75.1%, in 2024. The decrease was driven by the deconsolidation of the BRS business.
Revenues from Bernstein Research Services decreased $30.1 million, or 7.2%, in 2023. The decrease was primarily driven by significantly lower global customer trading activity due to the prevailing macro-economic environment.
Table of Contents
Part II
Distribution Revenues
Two of our subsidiaries act as distributors and/or placement agents of company-sponsored mutual funds and receive distribution services fees from certain of those funds as full or partial reimbursement of the distribution expenses they incur. Period-over-period fluctuations of distribution revenues typically are in line with fluctuations of the corresponding average AUM of these mutual funds.
Distribution revenues increased $140.4 million, or 23.9%, in 2024, primarily due to a 20.0% increase in the corresponding average AUM of these mutual funds. Distribution revenues decreased $20.9 million, or 3.4%, in 2023, primarily due to a shift in product mix from mutual funds with higher distribution rates to mutual funds with lower distribution rates, as well as a 1.4% decrease in the corresponding average AUM of these mutual funds.
Dividend and Interest Income and Broker-Dealer Related Interest Expense
Dividend and interest income consists primarily of investment income and interest earned on customer margin balances and U.S. Treasury Bills as well as dividend and interest income in our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds. Broker-dealer related interest expense principally reflects interest accrued on cash balances in customers’ brokerage accounts.
Dividend and interest income decreased $34.1 million, or 17.1%, in 2024, primarily due to lower interest earned on U.S. Treasury Bills and customer margin balances. Broker-dealer related interest expense decreased $23.0 million, or 21.4%, in 2024, primarily due to lower interest paid on cash balances in customers' brokerage accounts.
Dividend and interest income increased $76.4 million, or 62.0%, in 2023, primarily due to higher interest earned on customer margin balances and higher interest earned on U.S. Treasury Bills. Broker-dealer related interest expense increased $41.1 million, or 61.9%, in 2023, primarily due to higher interest paid on cash balances in customers' brokerage accounts.
46 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
Investment (Losses) Gains
Investment (losses) gains consist primarily of realized and unrealized investment gains or losses on: (i) employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments, (ii) U.S. Treasury Bills, (iii) market-making in exchange-traded options and equities, (iv) seed capital investments, (v) derivatives and (vi) investments in our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds. Investment gains (losses) also include equity in earnings of proprietary investments in limited partnership hedge funds that we sponsor and manage and equity gains (losses) related to our equity investments in JVs.
Investment (losses) gains are as follows:
Years Ended December 31
(in thousands)
Long-term incentive compensation-related investments:
Investments held by consolidated company-sponsored investment funds:
Seed capital investments:
Realized gains (losses)
Unrealized gains (losses)
Brokerage-related investments:
Equity investment in JVs:
Equity (loss) (36,611) — —
Other Revenues
Other revenues consist of fees earned for transfer agency services provided to company-sponsored mutual funds, fees earned for administration and recordkeeping services provided to company-sponsored mutual funds and the General Accounts of EQH and its subsidiaries, and other miscellaneous revenues. Other revenues increased $41.5 million, or 40.9%, in 2024, primarily due to certain reimbursements for services provided to the JVs. Other revenues decreased $4.2 million, or 4.0%, in 2023, primarily due to lower shareholder servicing fees and lower brokerage income, partially offset by higher mutual fund reimbursements.
Table of Contents
Part II
Expenses
The components of expenses are as follows:
Years Ended December 31 % Change
(in thousands)
Promotion and servicing:
Employee Compensation and Benefits
Employee compensation and benefits consist of base compensation (including salaries and severance), annual short-term incentive compensation awards (cash bonuses), annual long-term incentive compensation awards, commissions, fringe benefits and other employment costs (including recruitment, training, temporary help and meals).
Compensation expense as a percentage of net revenues was 40.3%, 42.6% and 41.1% for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Compensation expense generally is determined on a discretionary basis and is primarily a function of our firm’s current-year financial performance. The amounts of incentive compensation we award are designed to motivate, reward and retain top talent while aligning our executives' interests with the interests of our Unitholders. Senior management, together with the Compensation and Workplace Practices Committee of the Board of Directors of AllianceBernstein Corporation (“Compensation Committee”), continue to believe that the appropriate metric to consider in determining the amount of incentive compensation is the ratio of adjusted employee compensation and benefits expense to adjusted net revenues. Adjusted net revenues used in the adjusted compensation ratio are the same as the adjusted net revenues presented as a non-GAAP measure (discussed earlier in this Item 7). Adjusted employee compensation and benefits expense is total employee compensation and benefits expense minus other employment costs such as recruitment, training, temporary help and meals (which were 1.0%, 1.1% and 1.1% of adjusted net revenues for 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively), and excludes the impact of mark-to-market vesting expense, as well as dividends and interest expense, associated with employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments and the amortization expense associated with the awards issued by EQH to some of our firm's executives relating to their roles as members of the EQH Management Committee. Senior management, with the approval of the Compensation Committee, has established as an objective that adjusted employee compensation and benefits expense, excluding the impact of performance-based fees, generally should not exceed 50% of our adjusted net revenues in any year, except in unexpected or unusual circumstances. Our ratios of adjusted compensation expense as a percentage of adjusted net revenues were 47.9%, 49.0% and 48.4%, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.
In 2024, employee compensation and benefits expense increased $32.6 million, or 1.8%, primarily due to higher incentive compensation of $92.9 million and higher commissions of $27.9 million, partially offset by lower base compensation of $87.8 million primarily driven by the Bernstein Research Services deconsolidation. In 2023, employee compensation and benefits expense increased $102.5 million, or 6.2% primarily due to higher base compensation of $72.2 million, higher incentive compensation of $51.7 million and higher fringes of $7.8 million, partially offset by lower commissions of $29.0 million.
Promotion and Servicing
Promotion and servicing expenses include distribution-related payments to financial intermediaries for distribution of AB mutual funds and amortization of deferred sales commissions paid to financial intermediaries for the sale of back-end load shares of AB mutual funds. Also included in this expense category are costs related to trade execution and clearance, travel and entertainment, advertising and promotional materials.
48 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
Promotion and servicing expenses increased $119.7 million, or 13.9%, in 2024. The increase was due to higher distribution-related payments of $132.1 million, higher amortization of deferred sales commissions of $21.2 million and higher transfer fees of $11.1 million, partially offset by lower trade execution and clearance expenses of $47.1 million primarily driven by the Bernstein Research Services deconsolidation. Promotion and servicing expenses decreased $17.1 million, or 1.9%, in 2023. The decrease was due to lower distribution-related payments of $19.2 million, lower trade execution and clearance expenses of $9.0 million and lower transfer fees of $3.0 million, offset by higher travel and entertainment expenses of $8.5 million, higher marketing and communication expenses of $3.5 million and higher amortization of deferred sales commissions of $2.1 million.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses include portfolio services fees, technology fees, professional fees and office-related expenses (occupancy, communications and similar expenses). General and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues were 13.4%, 14.0% and 15.8% for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. General and administrative expenses increased $17.6 million, or 3.0%, in 2024. The increase was primarily due to higher office and related expenses of $13.3 million, losses related to the settlement of the retirement plan in 2024 of $13.1 million, higher portfolio services expenses of $7.3 million, higher other state income taxes of $6.3 million and higher charitable contributions of $5.3 million, partially offset by the recognition of a $20.8 million government incentive grant received in connection with our headquarters relocation to Nashville, Tennessee and lower errors of $3.3 million. General and administrative expenses decreased $60.1 million, or 9.4%, in 2023. The decrease was primarily due to lower portfolio services fees of $43.7 million, lower professional fees of $18.0 million, lower valuation adjustments related to the classification of Bernstein Research Services as held for sale of $6.0 million and a favorable foreign exchange translation impact of $5.7 million, partially offset by higher office-related expenses of $7.4 million.
Contingent Payment Arrangements
Contingent payment arrangements reflect changes in estimates of contingent payment liabilities associated with acquisitions in current and previous periods, as well as accretion expense of these liabilities. During 2024, we recognized a gain of $128.5 million in contingent payment arrangements in the consolidated statement of income related to a fair value remeasurement of the contingent payment liability associated with our acquisition of AB CarVal ( the "CarVal Acquisition") in 2022. The fair value remeasurement was due to updated assumptions of future performance associated with the liability. In December 2024, the company agreed to finalize its contingent consideration liability with AB CarVal for a value of $134.0 million. This liability will be paid predominantly in AB Units issued within 10 days of December 31, 2027. Given the liability is no longer contingent, the liability of approximately $118.8 million is now recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the consolidated statements of financial condition. We will accrete the present value of the liability of $118.8 million up to $134.0 million through December 31, 2027 and recognize this expense as general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of income on a prospective basis. As of December 31, 2023, the contingent consideration payable associated with the Carval Acquisition was $238.5 million.
During 2023, we recorded a change in estimate related to the contingent consideration liability associated with the acquisition of Autonomous LLC in 2019 of $14.1 million. The change in estimate was based upon better than expected revenues during the 2023 performance evaluation period. There were no changes in our estimates during the year ended December 31, 2022. These expenses resulting from changes to expected payments and the accretion of these obligations to their expected payment amounts are reflected within contingent payment arrangements in our consolidated statements of income.
For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, we recognized $9.0 million, $8.8 million and $6.6 million, respectively, in accretion expense related to our contingent considerations payable.
Interest on Borrowings
Interest expense decreased $10.9 million in 2024, primarily due to lower weighted average borrowings, partially offset by a slightly higher weighted average interest rate. Average daily borrowings for the EQH facilities and commercial paper were $762.4 million at a weighted average interest rate of 5.3% during 2024 compared to $1.0 billion and 5.1% during 2023.
Interest expense increased $36.5 million in 2023, reflecting higher interest rates on borrowings and higher weighted average borrowings. Average daily borrowings for the EQH facilities and commercial paper were $1.0 billion at a weighted average interest rate of 5.1% during 2023 compared to $845.5 million and 1.7% during 2022.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Amortization of intangible assets reflects our amortization of costs assigned to acquired investment management contracts with a finite life. These assets are recognized at fair value and generally are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful life. Amortization of intangible assets decreased by $0.9 million in 2024. During 2024, we wrote off approximately $4.4 million of intangible assets associated with various historical acquisitions.
Table of Contents
Part II
Amortization of intangible assets increased $20.3 million in 2023. The increase was primarily due to the acquired intangible assets associated with the CarVal acquisition. On July 1, 2022, AB acquired CarVal Investors L.P. ("CarVal"), which resulted in recording of $303.0 million of finite-lived intangible assets primarily relating to investment management contracts and investor relationships with useful lives ranging from 5 to 10 years.
Income Taxes
AB, a private limited partnership, is not subject to federal or state corporate income taxes. However, AB is subject to a 4.0% New York City unincorporated business tax (“UBT”). Our domestic corporate subsidiaries are subject to federal, state and local income taxes, and generally are included in the filing of a consolidated federal income tax return. Separate state and local income tax returns also are filed. Foreign corporate subsidiaries generally are subject to taxes in the jurisdictions where they are located.
Income tax expense increased $36.1 million, or 124.2%, in 2024 compared to 2023. This resulted in a higher effective tax rate in 2024 of 5.2% compared to 3.6% in 2023. Income tax expense decreased $10.6 million, or 26.7%, in 2023 compared to 2022. This resulted in a lower effective tax rate in 2023 of 3.6% compared to 4.9% in 2022.
The respective increase in 2024 and decrease in 2023 were primarily driven by a one time tax benefit of $22.4 million resulting from the release of a valuation allowance on a capital loss tax asset due to a 2023 tax planning action. The fluctuation for both comparative periods presented was primarily driven by this one time tax benefit in 2023.
Net Income (Loss) of Consolidated Entities Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests
Net income (loss) of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests primarily consists of limited partner interests owned by other investors in our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds. In 2024, we had $20.2 million of net income of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests, primarily due to gains on investments held by our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds. In 2023, we had $24.0 million of net income of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests, primarily due to gains on investments held by our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds. In 2022 we had $56.4 million of net loss of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests, primarily due to losses on investments held by our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Cash flows from operating activities primarily include the receipt of investment advisory and services fees and other revenues offset by the payment of operating expenses incurred in the normal course of business. Our cash flows from operating activities have historically been positive and sufficient to support our operations. We do not anticipate this to change in the foreseeable future. Cash flows from investing activities generally consist of small capital expenditures and, when applicable, divestitures, capital activity related to our equity method investments and business acquisitions. Cash flows from financing activities primarily consist of issuance and repayment of debt and the repurchase of AB Holding units to fund our long-term deferred compensation plans. We are required to distribute all of our Available Cash Flow to our Unitholders and the General Partner.
During 2024, net cash provided by operating activities was $1.4 billion, compared to $0.9 billion during 2023. The change was primarily due to higher earnings of $312.5 million (after non-cash reconciling items), the net activity of our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds of $128.1 million, an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $94.0 million and an increase in broker-dealer related payables (net of receivable and segregated U.S. Treasury Bills activity) of $87.9 million, partially offset by an increase in fees receivable of $140.8 million. During 2023, net cash provided by operating activities was $0.9 billion, compared to $1.1 billion during 2022. The change primarily was due to an increase in fees receivable of $161.1 million, lower earnings of $159.9 million (after non-cash reconciling items), a decrease in broker-dealer related payables (net of receivable and segregated U.S. Treasury Bills activity) of $133.3 million and an increase in deferred sales commissions of $59.8 million, partially offset by net activity of our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds of $166.0 million and an increase in accrued compensation of $127.4 million.
During 2024, net cash used in investing activities was $115.7 million, compared to $33.6 million during 2023. The change was primarily due to higher purchases of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements of $88.7 million and cash used related to the divestiture of the BRS business of $40.2 million. The cash used in the divestiture included $304.0 million in cash proceeds received from SocGen offset by $338.2 million in cash contributed from the transferring balance sheet and $6.0 million in direct costs to sell. In addition, there was an increase in debt repayment from equity method investments of $86.2 million offset by capital contributions to equity method investments of $39.4 million. During 2023, net cash used in investing activities was $33.6 million, compared to $22.0 million during 2022. The change is due to the acquisition of CarVal, net cash acquired of $40.3 million in 2022, partially offset by lower purchases of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements of $28.7 million.
50 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
During 2024, net cash used in financing activities was $1.6 billion, compared to $1.0 billion during 2023. The change is primarily due to higher repayments of debt of $608.6 million and higher cash distributions to Unitholders of $115.2 million, partially offset by proceeds from the issuance of private units to EQH of $150.0 million. During 2023, net cash used in financing activities was $1.0 billion, compared to $1.1 billion during 2022. The change reflects lower cash distributions to Unitholders of $230.6 million, a decrease in the net purchases of AB Holding Units to fund long-term incentive compensation plans of $66.5 million and the repayment of CarVal debt of $42.7 million, partially offset by higher net purchases of non-controlling interests of consolidated company-sponsored investment funds of $187.1 million and lower net borrowings of debt of $70.7 million.
As of December 31, 2024, AB had $832.0 million of cash and cash equivalents (excluding cash and cash equivalents of consolidated company-sponsored investment funds), all of which is available for liquidity but consist primarily of cash on deposit for our broker-dealers related to various customer clearing activities and cash held by foreign subsidiaries of $460.1 million.
See Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for disclosures relating to our debt and credit facilities. We use our debt and credit facilities to seed certain new investment products which may expose us to market risk, credit risk and material gains and losses. To reduce our exposure, we enter into various futures, forwards, options and swaps primarily to economically hedge certain of our seed money investments. While in most cases broad market risks are hedged and are effective in reducing our exposure, our hedges are imperfect and we may remain exposed to some market risk and credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties on these derivative instruments.
Our financial condition and access to public and private debt markets should provide adequate liquidity for our general business needs. Management believes that cash flow from operations and the issuance of debt and AB Units or AB Holding Units will provide us with the resources we need to meet our financial obligations. See “Risk Factors” in Item 1A and “Cautions Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in this Item 7 for a discussion of credit markets and our ability to renew our credit facilities at expiration.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations
Guarantees
Under various circumstances, AB guarantees the obligations of its consolidated subsidiaries.
AB maintains a guarantee in connection with an $800 million committed, unsecured senior revolving credit facility (the "Credit Facility"). If SCB LLC is unable to meet its obligations, AB will pay the obligations when due or on demand. SCB LLC currently has three uncommitted lines of credit with three financial institutions. Two of these lines of credit permit us to borrow up to an aggregate of approximately $150.0 million, with AB named as an additional borrower, while the other line has no stated limit. AB has guaranteed the obligations of SCB LLC under these lines of credit. AB maintains guarantees totaling $150.0 million for SCB LLC’s three uncommitted lines of credit.
AB maintains a guarantee with a commercial bank, under which we guarantee the obligations in the ordinary course of business for SCB LLC, one of our U.S. based broker-dealer. In the event this entity is unable to meet its obligations, AB will pay the obligation when due or on demand.
We also have two smaller guarantees with a commercial bank totaling approximately $1.8 million, under which we guarantee certain obligations in the ordinary course of business of one of our foreign subsidiaries.
Effective April 1, 2024 AB and SocGen completed their previously announced transaction to form the JVs. At the time of closing, Bernstein Institutional Services LLC (“BIS”), the U.S. broker-dealer subsidiary of the NA JV, entered into a credit facility agreement with SocGen, as lender, providing for up to $60.0 million of working capital. As a condition of the credit facility and until SocGen’s ownership exceeds 50% of NA JV, AB will provide a limited guarantee under which AB will guarantee up to its percentage ownership, currently 66.7%, of any unpaid obligations of BIS. As of December 31, 2024 there were no unpaid obligations under this facility requiring a guarantee by AB.
In addition, in connection with the close of the transaction, AB will indemnify SG Canada for certain obligations and liabilities in relation to SCB Canada until such time as SocGen exceeds 50% ownership of NA JV (the “Canadian Regulatory Guarantee”). Under the terms of the Canadian Regulatory Guarantee, SG Canada must guarantee the customer liabilities of SCB Canada to the full extent of its regulatory capital which fluctuates based upon business activity. AB has agreed to indemnify SG Canada for 66.7% of any amounts paid by SG Canada under the Canadian Regulatory Guarantee. As of December 31, 2024, there were no unpaid obligations requiring a guarantee by AB.
We have not been required to perform under any of the above agreements and currently have no outstanding liability in connection with these agreements.
Table of Contents
Part II
Aggregate Contractual Obligations
We have various compensation and benefit obligations, including accrued salaries and fringes, commissions, payroll taxes, incentive payments and deferred compensation arrangements. The majority of our compensation and benefits obligations are paid out in less than one year, while the deferred compensation obligations are payable over various periods, with the majority payable over periods of up to three years. Accrued compensation and benefits as of December 31, 2024 totaled $372.6 million. This amount excludes our accrued pension obligation. Offsetting our accrued compensation obligations are long-term incentive compensation-related investments and money market investments we funded totaling $43.5 million, which are included in our consolidated statement of financial condition. Any amounts reflected on the consolidated statement of financial condition as payables (to broker-dealers, brokerage clients and company-sponsored mutual funds) and accounts payable and accrued expenses are excluded from the aforementioned accrued compensation and benefits obligation amount.
We expect to make contributions to our qualified profit sharing plan of approximately $19.0 million in each of the next four years. Effective May 22, 2024, the Compensation Committee of the AB Board of Directors approved the termination of the retirement plan. Net assets available under the Plan will be distributed to the selected insurer and participants through the first quarter of 2025. We expect to make a contribution of approximately $5.3 million in 2025 to fully fund the retirement plan, purchase the group annuity contract and settle the remaining termination costs associated with the retirement plan.
The 2017 Tax Act (enacted in the U.S. on December 22, 2017) imposed a federal transition tax on mandatory deemed repatriation of certain deferred foreign earnings. Management elected to pay the transition tax in installments over an eight-year period from 2018 to 2025. The federal transition tax obligation as of December 31, 2024 totaled $4.7 million and is recorded to income tax payable on our consolidated statement of financial condition. See Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for further discussion of our taxes.
During the fourth quarter of 2024, we entered into a non-exclusive partnership with Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (“RGA”) under which we committed to invest $100.0 million in a reinsurance sidecar vehicle sponsored by RGA and focused on the U.S. asset-intensive reinsurance market. AB intends to manage private alternative assets for RGA’s general account as part of a separate transaction. As of December 31, 2024, we have funded $0.1 million of this commitment. The remaining commitment of up to $100.0 million can be called upon short notice at any future point.
See Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for discussion of our leases.
See Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for a discussion of our debt.
Contingencies
See Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for a discussion of our commitments and contingencies.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.
Management believes that the critical accounting policies and estimates discussed below involve significant management judgment due to the sensitivity of the methods and assumptions used.
Goodwill
Our acquisitions are accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting, where the cost of the acquisition is allocated on the basis of the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired, net of liabilities assumed, results in the recognition of goodwill.
As of December 31, 2024, we had goodwill of $3.6 billion on the consolidated statement of financial condition, which included $666.1 million as a result of the CarVal Investors L.P. ("CarVal") acquisition in 2022, $2.6 billion as a result of the Sanford C. Bernstein Inc. (“Bernstein”) acquisition in 2000 and $291.9 million in regard to various smaller acquisitions. As a result of the BRS deconsolidation, approximately $159.8 million of goodwill has been contributed to the JVs.
We have determined that AB has only one reporting segment and reporting unit. We test our goodwill annually, as of September 30, for impairment or if certain events or changes in circumstances occur and trigger an interim impairment test. The carrying value of goodwill is also reviewed if facts and circumstances occur that suggest possible impairment, such as, but not limited to significant transactions including acquisitions or divestitures and significant declines in AUM, revenues, earnings or the price of an AB Holding Unit. Any of these changes in circumstances could suggest the possibility that goodwill is
52 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
impaired, but none of these events or circumstances by itself would indicate that it is more likely than not that goodwill is impaired. Instead, they are merely recognized as triggering events for the consideration of impairment and must be viewed in combination with any mitigating or positive factors. A holistic evaluation of all events since the most recent quantitative impairment test must be done to determine whether it is more likely than not that the reporting unit is impaired.
For our annual impairment test, we utilize the market approach where the fair value of the reporting unit is based on its unadjusted market valuation (AB Units outstanding multiplied by AB Holding's Unit price) and earnings multiples. A goodwill impairment would be the amount by which a reporting unit's carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. The goodwill impairment test does not include a determination by management of whether a decline in fair value is temporary and it is important that management's determination of fair value reflect the impact of changing market conditions, including the severity and anticipated duration of any such changes. The price of a publicly traded AB Holding Unit serves as a reasonable starting point for valuing an AB Unit because each represents the same fractional interest in our underlying business. Our market approach analysis also includes comparable industry earnings multiples applied to our earnings forecast and assumes a control premium (when applicable).