Item 1A. Risk Factors
Please consider this section along with the description of our business in Item 1, the competition section immediately above and AB’s financial information contained in Items 7 and 8. The majority of the risk factors discussed below directly affect AB. These risk factors also affect AB Holding because AB Holding’s principal source of income and cash flow is attributable to its investment in AB. See also “Cautions Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in Item 7.
Business-related Risks
Our revenues and results of operations depend on the market value and composition of our AUM, which can fluctuate significantly based on various factors, including many factors outside of our control.
We derive most of our revenues from investment advisory and services fees, which typically are calculated as a percentage of the value of AUM as of a specified date, or as a percentage of the value of average AUM for the applicable billing period, and vary with the type of investment service, the size of the account and the total amount of assets we manage for a particular client. The value and composition of our AUM can be adversely affected by several factors, including:
•Market Factors. Our AUM remain sensitive to the volatility associated with global financial market conditions. For example, the heightened global inflationary pressures that resulted in sizable interest rate increases and associated market volatility in 2022 and 2023. We recognize that, due to continued uncertainty associated with the global response to heightened global inflationary pressures, markets may remain volatile and, accordingly, there remains risk of a significant reduction in our revenues and net income in future periods. Global economies and financial markets are increasingly interconnected, which increases the probability that conditions in one country or region might adversely impact a different country or region. Conditions affecting the general economy, including political, social or economic instability at the local, regional or global level may also affect the market value of our AUM. War, such as the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the middle east, or civil disturbance, acts of terrorism (whether foreign or domestic), health crises (such as the COVID-19 pandemic), as well as other incidents that interrupt the expected course of events, such as natural disasters, power outages and other unforeseeable and external events, and the public response to or fear of such diseases or events, have had and may in the future have a significant adverse effect on financial markets and our AUM, revenues and net income. Also, significant market volatility and uncertainty, and reductions in the availability of margin financing, can significantly limit the liquidity of certain asset backed and other securities, making it at times impossible to sell these securities at prices reflecting their true economic value. While liquidity conditions were relatively stable in 2023 despite market volatility, we recognize the possibility that conditions could deteriorate in the future. Lack of liquidity makes it more difficult for our funds to meet redemption requests. If liquidity were to worsen, this may have a significant adverse effect on our AUM, revenues and net income in the future.
•Client Preferences. Generally, our clients may withdraw their assets at any time and on short notice. Also, changing market dynamics and investment trends, particularly with respect to sponsors of defined benefit plans choosing to invest in less risky investments and the ongoing shift to lower-fee passive services described below, may continue to reduce interest in some of the investment products we offer, and/or clients and prospects may continue to seek investment products that we may not currently offer. Loss of, or decreases in, AUM reduces our investment advisory and services fees and revenues.
Table of Contents
Part I
•Our Investment Performance. Our ability to achieve investment returns for clients that meet or exceed investment returns for comparable asset classes and competing investment services is a key consideration when clients decide to keep their assets with us or invest additional assets, and when a prospective client is deciding whether to invest with us. Poor investment performance, both in absolute terms and/or relative to peers and stated benchmarks, may result in clients withdrawing assets and prospective clients choosing to invest with competitors.
•Investing Trends. Our fee rates can vary significantly among the various investment products and services we offer to our clients (see “Net Revenues” in Item 7 for additional information regarding our fee rates); our fee realization rate fluctuates as clients shift assets between accounts or products with different fee structures.
•Service Changes. We may be required to reduce our fee levels, restructure the fees we charge and/or adjust the services we offer to our clients because of, among other things, regulatory initiatives (whether industry-wide or specifically targeted), changing technology in the asset management business (including algorithmic strategies and emerging financial technology), court decisions and competitive considerations. A reduction in fee levels would reduce our revenues.
•Interest Rate Changes. Investor interest in and the valuation of our fixed income and multi-asset investment portfolios can be adversely affected by changes in interest rates, particularly if interest rates increase substantially and quickly.
A decrease in the value of our AUM, a decrease in the amount of AUM we manage, an adverse mix shift in our AUM and/or a reduction in the level of fees we charge would adversely affect our investment advisory fees and revenues. A reduction in revenues, without a commensurate reduction in expenses, adversely affects our results of operations.
The industry-wide shift from actively managed investment services to passive services has adversely affected our investment advisory and services fees, revenues and results of operations, and this trend may continue.
Our competitive environment has become increasingly difficult, as active managers, which invest based on individual security selection, have, on average, consistently underperformed passive services, which invest based on market indices. In the most recent period this trend reversed, as active performance relative to benchmarks improved, with 57% of active managers outperforming their passive benchmarks for the 12 months ended June 30, 2023 (latest data available), compared to 43% for the prior 12-month period. 57% of active US stock funds outperformed, up from 48% the prior year, while 63% of active non-U.S. stock funds outperformed their benchmarks, up from just 33% the prior period. Performance of actively managed bond funds also improved in 2023, with 55% outperforming benchmarks, up from just 30% in the prior-year period.
Flows into actively managed funds substantially improved industry-wide in 2023, with U.S. industry-wide active mutual fund inflows of $549 billion in 2023, compared with outflows of $931 billion in 2022. The improvement was led by $927 billion in inflows to Money Market funds, as investors responded to the higher interest rate environment. Active fixed income U.S. mutual funds also experienced improvement, with inflows of $16 billion in 2023, compared with outflows of $465 billion in 2022. Active equity U.S. mutual fund outflows were $246 billion in 2023, compared to outflows of $235 billion in 2022. Demand for passive strategies in the U.S. continued to grow, though at a reduced rate from the prior year, as industry-wide total passive mutual fund net inflows of $489 billion in 2023 compared to $540 billion in 2022. Organic growth through net inflows continues to be difficult to achieve for active managers, such as AB, and requires taking market share from other active managers.
The significant shift from active services to passive services adversely affects Bernstein Research Services revenues as well. Institutional global market trading volumes continue to be pressured by persistent active equity outflows and passive equity inflows. As a result, portfolio turnover has declined and investors hold fewer shares that are actively traded by managers.
Our reputation could suffer if we are unable to deliver consistent, competitive investment performance.
Our business is based on the trust and confidence of our clients. Damage to our reputation, resulting from poor or inconsistent investment performance, among other factors, can reduce substantially our AUM and impair our ability to maintain or grow our business.
EQH and its subsidiaries provide a significant amount of our AUM and fund a significant portion of our seed investments, and if our agreements with them terminate or they withdraw capital support it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and/or financial condition.
EQH (our parent company) and its subsidiaries constitute our largest client. Our EQH affiliates represented approximately 16% of our AUM as of December 31, 2023, and we earned approximately 5% of our net revenues from services we provided to them. Our related investment management agreements are terminable at any time or on short notice by either party, and EQH is not under any obligation to maintain any level of AUM with us. A material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and/or financial condition could result if EQH were to terminate its investment management agreements with us.
18 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part I
Our business is dependent on investment advisory agreements with clients, and selling and distribution agreements with various financial intermediaries and consultants, which generally are subject to termination or non-renewal on short notice.
We derive most of our revenues pursuant to written investment management agreements (or other arrangements) with institutional investors, mutual funds and private wealth clients, and selling and distribution agreements with financial intermediaries that distribute AB Funds. Generally, the investment management agreements (and other arrangements), including our agreements with EQH and its subsidiaries, are terminable at any time or upon relatively short notice by either party. The investment management agreements pursuant to which we manage the U.S. Funds must be renewed and approved by the Funds’ boards of directors annually. A significant majority of the directors are independent. Consequently, there can be no assurance that the board of directors of each fund will approve the fund’s investment management agreement each year, or will not condition its approval on revised terms that may be adverse to us. In addition, investors in AB Funds can redeem their investments without notice. Any termination of, or failure to renew, a significant number of these agreements, or a significant increase in redemption rates, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and business prospects.
Similarly, the selling and distribution agreements with securities firms, brokers, banks and other financial intermediaries are terminable by either party upon notice (generally 30 days) and do not obligate the financial intermediary to sell any specific amount of fund shares. These intermediaries generally offer their clients investment products that compete with our products. In addition, certain institutional investors rely on consultants to advise them about choosing an investment adviser and some of our services may not be considered among the best choices by these consultants. As a result, investment consultants may advise their clients to move their assets invested with us to other investment advisers, which could result in significant net outflows.
Lastly, our Private Wealth Services rely on referrals from financial planners, registered investment advisers and other professionals. We cannot be certain that we will continue to have access to, or receive referrals from, these third parties. Loss of such access or referrals could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and business prospects.
Performance-based fee arrangements with our clients may cause greater fluctuations in our net revenues.
We sometimes charge our clients performance-based fees, whereby we charge a base advisory fee and are eligible to earn an additional performance-based fee or incentive allocation that is calculated as either a percentage of absolute investment results or a percentage of investment results in excess of a stated benchmark over a specified period of time. Some performance-based fees include a high-watermark provision, which generally provides that if a client account under-performs relative to its performance target (whether in absolute terms or relative to a specified benchmark), it must gain back such under-performance before we can collect future performance-based fees. Therefore, if we fail to achieve the performance target for a particular period, we will not earn a performance-based fee for that period and, for accounts with a high-watermark provision, our ability to earn future performance-based fees will be impaired.
We are eligible to earn performance-based fees on 9.3%, 8.3% and 0.4% of the assets we manage for institutional clients, private wealth clients and retail clients, respectively (in total, 5.6% of our AUM). If the percentage of our AUM subject to performance-based fees increases, seasonality and volatility of revenue and earnings are likely to become more significant. Our performance-based fees were $144.9 million, $145.2 million and $245.1 million in 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
The revenues generated by Bernstein Research Services may be adversely affected by circumstances beyond our control, including declines in brokerage transaction rates, declines in global market volumes, failure to settle our trades by significant counterparties.
Electronic, or “low-touch,” trading represents a significant percentage of buy-side trading activity and typically produces transaction fees that are significantly lower than traditional full-service fee rates. As a result, blended pricing throughout our industry is lower now than it was historically, and price declines may continue. In addition, fee rates we charge and charged by other brokers for brokerage services have historically experienced price pressure, and we expect these trends to continue. Also, while increases in transaction volume and market share often can offset decreases in rates, this may not continue.
In addition, the failure or inability of any of our broker-dealer's significant counterparties to perform could expose us to substantial expenditures and adversely affect our revenues. For example, SCB LLC, as a member of clearing and settlement organizations, would be required to settle open trades of any non-performing counterparty. This exposes us to the mark-to-market adjustment on the trades between trade date and settlement date, which could be significant, especially during periods of severe market volatility. Also, our ability to access liquidity in such situations may be limited by what our funding relationships are able to offer us at such times.
Lastly, extensive changes proposed by the SEC to the equity market structure, including Regulation Best Execution, the proposed Order Competition Rule, the proposed volume-based exchange transaction pricing rule and proposed changes to Regulation NMS establishing, among other things, minimum pricing increments and required disclosures by larger broker-dealers and specified trading platforms, if adopted as proposed, could substantially increase the cost of conducting our buy-side and broker-dealer operations and, possibly, adversely impact trade execution quality.
Table of Contents
Part I
We may be unable to develop new products and services, and the development of new products and services may expose us to reputational harm, additional costs or operational risk.
Our financial performance depends, in part, on our ability to react nimbly to changes in the asset management industry, respond to evolving client needs, and develop, market and manage new investment products and services. Conversely, the development and introduction of new products and services, including the creation of products with concentrations in industries or sectors specific to individual client criteria, or with a focus on ESG, requires continuous innovative effort on our part and may require significant time and resources as well as ongoing support and investment. Substantial risk and uncertainties are associated with the introduction of new products and services, including the implementation of new and appropriate operational controls and procedures, shifting client and market preferences, the introduction of competing products or services, and compliance with regulatory and disclosure requirements. We can make no assurance that we will be able to develop new products and services that successfully address the needs of clients within needed timeframes. Any failure to successfully develop new products and services, or effectively manage associated operational risks, could harm our reputation and expose us to additional costs, which could adversely affect our AUM, revenues and operating income.
Fluctuations in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and various other currencies can adversely affect our AUM, revenues and results of operations.
Although significant portions of our net revenues and expenses, as well as our AUM, presently are denominated in U.S. dollars, we have subsidiaries and clients outside of the United States with functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Weakening of these currencies relative to the U.S. dollar adversely affects the value in U.S. dollar terms of our revenues and our AUM denominated in these other currencies. Accordingly, fluctuations in U.S. dollar exchange rates affect our AUM, revenues and reported financial results from one period to the next.
We may not be successful in our efforts to hedge our exposure to such fluctuations, which could negatively impact our revenues and reported financial results.
Our seed capital investments are subject to market risk. While we enter into various futures, forwards, swap and option contracts to economically hedge many of these investments, we also may be exposed to market risk and credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to these derivative instruments.
We have a seed investment program for the purpose of building track records and assisting with the marketing initiatives pertaining to our firm's new products. These seed capital investments are subject to market risk. Our risk management team oversees a seed hedging program that attempts to minimize this risk, subject to practical and cost considerations. Also, not all seed investments are deemed appropriate to hedge, and in those cases we are exposed to market risk. In addition, we may be subject to basis risk in that we cannot always hedge with precision our market exposure and, as a result, we may be subject to relative spreads between market sectors. As a result, volatility in the capital markets may cause significant changes in our period-to-period financial and operating results.
We use various derivative instruments, including futures, forwards, swaps and option contracts, in conjunction with our seed hedging program. While in most cases broad market risks are hedged, our hedges are imperfect and some market risk remains. In addition, our use of derivatives results in counterparty risk (i.e., the risk that we may be exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to these derivative instruments), regulatory risk (e.g., short selling restrictions) and cash/synthetic basis risk (i.e., the risk that the underlying positions do not move identically to the related derivative instruments).
We may engage in strategic transactions that could pose risks.
As part of our business strategy, we consider potential strategic transactions, including acquisitions (such as our purchase of CarVal Investors in 2022), dispositions, mergers, consolidations, joint venture partnerships (such as our planned joint venture partnership with SocGen) and similar transactions, some of which may be material. These transactions, if undertaken, may involve various risks and present financial, managerial and operational challenges, including:
•adverse effects on our earnings if acquired intangible assets or goodwill become impaired;
•existence of unknown liabilities or contingencies that arise after closing;
•potential disputes with counterparties; and
•the possible need for us to increase our firm's leverage or, if we fund the purchase price of a transaction with AB Units or AB Holding Units, likely dilution to our existing unitholders.
Acquisitions also pose the risk that any business we acquire may lose customers or employees or could under-perform relative to expectations. Additionally, the loss of investment personnel poses the risk that we may lose the AUM we expected to manage, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
20 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part I
We may not accurately value the securities we hold on behalf of our clients or our company investments.
In accordance with applicable regulatory requirements, contractual obligations or client direction, we employ procedures for the pricing and valuation of securities and other positions held in client accounts or for company investments. We have established a Valuation Committee and sub-committees, consisting of senior officers and employees, which oversee a consistent framework of pricing controls and valuation processes for the firm and each of its advisory affiliates. If market quotations for a security are not readily available, the Valuation Committee determines a fair value for the security.
Extraordinary volatility in financial markets, significant liquidity constraints or our failure to adequately consider one or more factors when determining the fair value of a security based on information with limited market observability could result in our failing to properly value securities we hold for our clients or investments accounted for on our balance sheet. Improper valuation likely would result in our basing fee calculations on inaccurate AUM figures, our striking incorrect net asset values for company-sponsored mutual funds or hedge funds or, in the case of company investments, our inaccurately calculating and reporting our financial condition and operating results. Although the overall percentage of our AUM that we fair value based on information with limited market observability is not significant, inaccurate fair value determinations can harm our clients, create regulatory issues and damage our reputation.
The quantitative and systematic models we use in certain of our investment services may contain errors, resulting in imprecise risk assessments and unintended output.
We use quantitative and systematic models in a variety of our investment services, usually in combination with fundamental research. These models are developed by senior quantitative professionals and typically are implemented by IT professionals. Our Model Risk Oversight Committee oversees the model governance framework and associated model review activities, which are then executed by our Model Risk Team. However, due to the complexity and large data dependency of such models, it is possible that errors in the models could exist and our controls could fail to detect such errors. Failure to detect errors could result in client losses and reputational damage.
The financial services industry is intensely competitive.
We compete on the basis of a number of factors, including our investment performance for our clients, our array of investment services, innovation, reputation and price. By having a global presence, we often face competitors with more experience and more established relationships with clients, regulators and industry participants in the relevant market, which could adversely affect our ability to expand. Furthermore, if we are unable to maintain and/or continue to improve our investment performance, our client flows may be adversely affected, which may make it more difficult for us to compete effectively.
Also, increased competition could reduce the demand for our products and services, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and business prospects. For additional information regarding competitive factors, see “Competition” in Item 1.
People-related Risks
We may be unable to continue to attract, motivate and retain key personnel, and the cost to retain key personnel could put pressure on our adjusted operating margin.
Our business depends on our ability to attract, motivate and retain highly skilled, and often highly specialized, technical, investment, managerial and executive personnel, and there is no assurance that we will be able to continue to do so.
The market for these professionals is extremely competitive. Certain of these professionals often maintain strong, personal relationships with investors in our products and other members of the business community so their departure may cause us to lose client accounts or result in fewer opportunities to win new business, either of which factors could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and business prospects.
Additionally, a decline in revenues may limit our ability to pay our employees at competitive levels, and maintaining (or increasing) compensation without a revenue increase, in order to retain key personnel, may adversely affect our operating margin. For additional information regarding our compensation practices, see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" in Item 11.
Our process of relocating our headquarters may not be executed as we have envisioned.
We have established our corporate headquarters in and have relocated a large number of the positions jobs previously located in the New York metropolitan area to Nashville, Tennessee (for additional information, see “Relocation Strategy” in Item 7). Although the ongoing impact on AB from this process is not yet known, the uncertainty created by these circumstances could adversely affect AB’s ability to motivate and retain current employees and hire qualified employees in our Nashville headquarters.
Additionally, our estimates for both the transition costs and the corresponding expense savings relating to our headquarters relocation are based on our current assumptions of employee relocation costs, severance, and overlapping compensation and occupancy costs. If our assumptions turn out to be inaccurate, our expenses and operating income could be adversely affected.
Table of Contents
Part I
Employee misconduct, which can be difficult to detect and deter, could harm us by impairing our ability to attract and retain clients and subjecting us to significant regulatory scrutiny, legal liability and reputational harm.
There have been several highly publicized cases involving fraud or other misconduct by employees in the financial services industry generally, and we are not immune. Misconduct by employees could involve the improper use or disclosure of confidential information, which could result in legal action, regulatory sanctions, and reputational or financial harm. Further, fraud, payment or solicitation of bribes and other deceptive practices or other misconduct by our employees could similarly subject us to regulatory scrutiny, legal liability and reputational damage.
Operational, Technology and Cyber-related Risks
Technology failures and disruptions, including failures to properly safeguard confidential information, can significantly constrain our operations and result in significant time and expense to remediate, which could result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations and business prospects.
We are highly dependent on software and related technologies throughout our business, including both proprietary systems and those provided by third-party vendors. We use our technology to, among other things, obtain securities pricing information, process client transactions, store and maintain data, and provide reports and other services to our clients. Despite our protective measures, including measures designed to effectively secure information through system security technology and established and tested business continuity plans, we may still experience system delays and interruptions as a result of natural disasters, hardware failures, software defects, power outages, acts of war and third-party failures. We cannot predict with certainty all of the adverse effects that could result from our failure, or the failure of a third party, to efficiently address and resolve these delays and interruptions. These adverse effects could include the inability to perform critical business functions or failure to comply with financial reporting and other regulatory requirements, which could lead to loss of client confidence, reputational damage, exposure to disciplinary action and liability to our clients.
Many of the software applications that we use in our business are licensed from, and supported, upgraded and maintained by, third-party vendors. A suspension or termination of certain of these licenses or the related support, upgrades and maintenance could cause temporary system delays or interruption. Additionally, technology rapidly evolves and we cannot guarantee that our competitors may not implement more advanced technology platforms for their products and services, which may place us at a competitive disadvantage and adversely affect our results of operations and business prospects.
Also, we could be subject to losses if we fail to properly safeguard sensitive and confidential information. As part of our normal operations, we maintain and transmit confidential information about our clients as well as proprietary information relating to our business operations. Although we take protective measures, our systems still could be vulnerable to cyber attack or other forms of unauthorized access (including computer viruses) that have a security impact, such as an authorized employee or vendor inadvertently or intentionally causing us to release confidential or proprietary information. Such disclosure could, among other things, allow competitors access to our proprietary business information and require significant time and expense to investigate and remediate the breach. Moreover, loss of confidential client information could harm our reputation and subject us to liability under laws that protect confidential personal data, resulting in increased costs or loss of revenues.
Any significant security breach of our information and cyber security infrastructure, as well as our failure to properly escalate and respond to such an incident, may significantly harm our operations and reputation.
It is critical that we ensure the continuity and effectiveness of our information and cyber security infrastructure, policies, procedures and capabilities to protect our computer and telecommunications systems and the data that reside on or are transmitted through them and contracted third-party systems. Although we take protective measures, including measures to effectively secure information through system security technology, our technology systems may still be vulnerable to unauthorized access, supply chain attacks, computer viruses or other events that have a security impact, such as an external attack by one or more cyber criminals (including phishing attacks attempting to obtain confidential information and ransomware attacks attempting to block access to a computer system until a sum of money is paid), which could materially harm our operations and reputation. Additionally, while we take precautions to password protect and encrypt our laptops and sensitive information on our other mobile electronic devices, if such devices are stolen, misplaced or left unattended, they may become vulnerable to hacking or other unauthorized use, creating a possible security risk and resulting in potentially costly actions by us.
Furthermore, although we maintain a robust cyber security infrastructure and incident preparedness strategy, which we test frequently, we may be unable to respond, both internally and externally, to a cyber incident in a sufficiently expeditious manner. Any such failure could cause significant harm to our reputation and result in litigation, regulatory scrutiny and/or significant remediation costs, see "Cybersecurity" in Item 1C.
22 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part I
Climate change and other unpredictable events, including outbreak of infectious disease, natural disaster, dangerous weather conditions, technology failure, terrorist attack and political unrest, may adversely affect our ability to conduct business.
War, terrorist attack, political unrest, power failure, climate change, natural disaster and rapid spread of infectious disease (such as the COVID-19 pandemic) could interrupt our operations by:
•causing disruptions in global economic conditions, thereby decreasing investor confidence and making investment products generally less attractive;
•inflicting loss of life;
•triggering large-scale technology failures or delays;
•breaching our information and cyber security infrastructure; and
•requiring substantial capital expenditures and operating expenses to remediate damage and restore operations.
Furthermore, climate change may increase the severity and frequency of catastrophes, or adversely affect our investment portfolio or investor sentiment. Climate change may also increase the frequency and severity of weather-related disasters and pandemics. And, climate change regulation may affect the prospects of companies and other entities whose securities in which we invest, or our willingness to continue to invest in such securities.
Despite the contingency plans and facilities we have in place, including system security measures, information back-up and disaster recovery processes, our ability to conduct business, including in key business centers where we have significant operations, such as Nashville, Tennessee, New York City, San Antonio, Texas, London, England, Hong Kong, and India, may be adversely affected by a disruption in the infrastructure that supports our operations and the communities in which they are located. This may include a disruption involving electrical, communications, transportation or other services we may use or third parties with which we conduct business. If a disruption occurs in one location and our employees in that location are unable to occupy our offices or communicate with or travel to other locations, our ability to conduct business with and on behalf of our clients may suffer, and we may not be able to successfully implement contingency plans that depend on communication or travel. Furthermore, unauthorized access to our systems as a result of a security breach, the failure of our systems, or the loss of data could give rise to legal proceedings or regulatory penalties under laws protecting the privacy of personal information, disrupt operations, and damage our reputation.
Our operations require experienced, professional staff. Loss of a substantial number of such persons or an inability to provide properly equipped places for them to work may, by disrupting our operations, adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and business prospects. In addition, our property and business interruption insurance may not be adequate to compensate us for all losses, failures or breaches that may occur.
Our own operational failures or those of third parties on which we rely, including failures arising out of human error, could disrupt our business, damage our reputation and reduce our revenues.
Weaknesses or failures in our internal processes or systems could lead to disruption of our operations, liability to clients, exposure to disciplinary action or harm to our reputation. Our business is highly dependent on our ability to process, on a daily basis, large numbers of transactions, many of which are highly complex, across numerous and diverse markets. These transactions generally must comply with client investment guidelines, as well as stringent legal and regulatory standards.
Our obligations to clients require us to exercise skill, care and prudence in performing our services. Despite our employees being highly trained and skilled, the large number of transactions we process makes it highly likely that errors will occasionally occur. If we make a mistake in performing our services that causes financial harm to a client, we have a duty to act promptly to put the client in the position the client would have been in had we not made the error. The occurrence of mistakes, particularly significant ones, can have a material adverse effect on our reputation, results of operations and business prospects.
The individuals and third-party vendors on whom we rely to perform services for us or our clients may be unable or unwilling to honor their contractual obligations to us.
We rely on various counterparties and other third-party vendors to augment our existing investment, operational, financial and technological capabilities, but the use of a third-party vendor does not diminish AB's responsibility to ensure that client and regulatory obligations are met. Default rates, credit downgrades and disputes with counterparties as to the valuation of collateral increase significantly in times of market stress. Disruptions in the financial markets and other economic challenges may cause our counterparties and other third-party vendors to experience significant cash flow problems or even render them insolvent, which may expose us to significant costs and impair our ability to conduct business.
Weaknesses or failures within a third-party vendor's internal processes or systems, or inadequate business continuity plans, can materially disrupt our business operations. Also, third-party vendors may lack the necessary infrastructure or resources to effectively safeguard our confidential data. If we are unable to effectively manage the risks associated with such third-party relationships, we may suffer fines, disciplinary action and reputational damage.
Table of Contents
Part I
We may not always successfully manage actual and potential conflicts of interest that arise in our business.
Increasingly, we must manage actual and potential conflicts of interest, including situations where our services to a particular client conflict, or are perceived to conflict, with the interests of another client. Failure to adequately address potential conflicts of interest could adversely affect our reputation, results of operations and business prospects.
We have procedures and controls that are designed to identify and mitigate conflicts of interest, including those designed to prevent the improper sharing of information. However, appropriately managing conflicts of interest is complex. Our reputation could be damaged and the willingness of clients to enter into transactions in which such a conflict might arise may be affected if we fail, or appear to fail, to deal appropriately with actual or perceived conflicts of interest. In addition, potential or perceived conflicts could give rise to litigation or regulatory enforcement actions.
Maintaining adequate liquidity for our general business needs depends on certain factors, including operating cash flows and our access to credit on reasonable terms.
Our financial condition is dependent on our cash flow from operations, which is subject to the performance of the capital markets, our ability to maintain and grow AUM and other factors beyond our control. Our ability to issue public or private debt on reasonable terms may be limited by adverse market conditions, our profitability, our creditworthiness as perceived by lenders and changes in government regulations, including tax rates and interest rates. Furthermore, our access to credit on reasonable terms is partially dependent on our firm’s credit ratings.
Both Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor's Rating Service affirmed AB’s long-term and short-term credit ratings and indicated a stable outlook in 2023. Future changes in our credit ratings are possible and any downgrade to our ratings is likely to increase our borrowing costs and limit our access to the capital markets. If this occurs, we may be forced to incur unanticipated costs or revise our strategic plans, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.
An impairment of goodwill may occur.
Determining whether an impairment of the goodwill asset exists requires management to exercise a substantial amount of judgment. In addition, to the extent that securities valuations are depressed for prolonged periods of time and/or market conditions deteriorate, or if we experience significant net redemptions, our AUM, revenues, profitability and unit price will be adversely affected. Although the price of an AB Holding Unit is just one factor in the calculation of fair value, if AB Holding Unit price levels decline significantly, reaching the conclusion that fair value exceeds carrying value will, over time, become more difficult. In addition, control premiums, industry earnings multiples and discount rates are impacted by economic conditions. As a result, subsequent impairment tests may occur more frequently and be based on more negative assumptions and future cash flow projections, and may result in an impairment of goodwill. An impairment may result in a material charge to our earnings. For additional information about our impairment testing, see Item 7.
The insurance that we purchase may not fully cover all potential exposures.
We maintain professional liability, errors & omissions, fidelity, cyber, property, casualty, business interruption and other types of insurance, but such insurance may not cover all risks associated with the operation of our business. Our coverage is subject to exclusions and limitations, including high self-insured retentions or deductibles and maximum limits and liabilities covered. In addition, from time to time, various types of insurance may not be available on commercially acceptable terms or, in some cases, at all. We can make no assurance that a claim or claims will be covered by our insurance policies or, if covered, will not exceed our available insurance coverage, or that our insurers will remain solvent and meet their obligations.
In the future, we may not be able to obtain coverage at current levels, if at all, and our premiums may increase significantly on coverage that we maintain. Also, we currently are party to certain joint insurance arrangements with subsidiaries of EQH. If our affiliates choose not to include us as insured parties under any such policies, we may need to obtain stand-alone insurance coverage, which could have coverage terms that are less beneficial to us and/or cost more.
Legal and Regulatory-related Risks
Our business is subject to pervasive, complex and continuously evolving global regulation, compliance with which involves substantial expenditures of time and money, and violation of which may result in material adverse consequences.
Virtually all aspects of our business are subject to federal and state laws and regulations, rules of securities regulators and exchanges, and laws and regulations in the foreign jurisdictions in which our subsidiaries conduct business. If we violate these laws or regulations, we could be subject to civil liability, criminal liability or sanction, including restriction or revocation of our and our subsidiaries’ professional licenses or registrations, revocation of the licenses of our employees, censures, fines, or temporary suspension or permanent bar from conducting business. Any such liability or sanction could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and business prospects. A regulatory proceeding, even if it does not result in a finding of wrongdoing or sanction, could require substantial expenditures of time and money and could potentially damage our reputation.
24 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part I
In recent years, global regulators have substantially increased their oversight of financial services. Some of the newly-adopted and proposed regulations are focused on investment management services. Others, while more broadly focused, nonetheless impact our business. Moreover, the adoption of new laws, regulations or standards and changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws, regulations or standards have directly affected, and will continue to affect, our business, including making our efforts to comply more expensive and time-consuming.
For example, there has been increasing regulatory focus on ESG-related practices by investment managers. In 2023, the State of California passed two climate disclosure laws that will impose significant reporting obligations on companies doing business in California. Additionally, the SEC is poised in 2024 to issue a rule enhancing and standardizing climate disclosures by U.S. public companies, including investment managers. The SEC also has focused on the labeling by investment funds of their activities or investments as "sustainable" and has examined the methodology used by funds for determining ESG investments, with a keen focus on whether such labeling may be misleading. Outside the U.S., the European Commission has adopted an action plan on financing sustainable growth, as well as initiatives at the European Union (the "EU") level, such as the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (the "SFDR"). Compliance with the SFDR and other ESG-related regulations may subject us to increased restrictions, disclosure obligations, and compliance and other associated costs, as well as potential reputational harm.
Also, in 2015 the Financial Supervisory Commission in Taiwan (the “FSC”) implemented new limits on the degree to which local investors can own an offshore investment product. While certain exemptions have been available to us, should we not continue to qualify, the FSC’s rules could force some of our local resident investors to redeem their investments in our funds sold in Taiwan (and/or prevent further sales of those funds in Taiwan), some of which funds have local ownership levels substantially above the FSC limits. This could lead to significant declines in our investment advisory and services fees and revenues earned from these funds.
We are involved in various legal proceedings and regulatory matters and may be involved in such proceedings in the future, any one or combination of which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.
We are involved in various matters, including regulatory inquiries, administrative proceedings and litigation, some of which allege significant damages, and we may be involved in additional matters in the future. Litigation is subject to significant uncertainties, particularly when plaintiffs allege substantial or indeterminate damages, the litigation is in its early stages, or when the litigation is highly complex or broad in scope.
Structure-related Risks
The partnership structure of AB Holding and AB limits Unitholders’ abilities to influence the management and operation of AB’s business and is highly likely to prevent a change in control of AB Holding and AB.
The General Partner, as general partner of both AB Holding and AB, generally has the exclusive right and full authority and responsibility to manage, conduct, control and operate their respective businesses, except as otherwise expressly stated in their respective Amended and Restated Agreements of Limited Partnership. AB Holding and AB Unitholders have more limited voting rights on matters affecting AB than do holders of common stock in a corporation. Both Amended and Restated Agreements of Limited Partnership provide that Unitholders do not have any right to vote for directors of the General Partner and that Unitholders only can vote on certain extraordinary matters (including removal of the General Partner under certain extraordinary circumstances). Additionally, the AB Partnership Agreement includes significant restrictions on the transfer of AB Units and provisions that have the practical effect of preventing the removal of the General Partner, which provisions are highly likely to prevent a change in control of AB’s management.
AB Units are illiquid and subject to significant transfer restrictions.
There is no public trading market for AB Units and we do not anticipate that a public trading market will develop. The AB Partnership Agreement restricts our ability to participate in a public trading market or anything substantially equivalent to one by providing that any transfer that may cause AB to be classified as a “publicly traded partnership” (“PTP”) as defined in Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), shall be deemed void and shall not be recognized by AB. In addition, AB Units are subject to significant restrictions on transfer, such as obtaining the written consent of EQH and the General Partner pursuant to the AB Partnership Agreement. Generally, neither EQH nor the General Partner will permit any transfer that it believes would create a risk that AB would be treated as a corporation for tax purposes. EQH and the General Partner have implemented a transfer program that requires a seller to locate a purchaser and imposes annual volume restrictions on transfers. You may request a copy of the transfer program from our Corporate Secretary (corporate_secretary@alliancebernstein.com). Also, we have filed the transfer program as Exhibit 10.07 to this Form 10-K.
Changes in the treatment of AB Holding and AB as partnerships for tax purposes would have significant tax ramifications.
Having elected under Section 7704(g) of the Code to be subject to a 3.5% federal tax on partnership gross income from the active conduct of a trade or business, AB Holding is a PTP that is taxable as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. To preserve AB Holding's status as a PTP that is taxed as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, AB Holding must not directly or indirectly (through AB) enter into a substantial new line of business. A “new line of business” includes any business
Table of Contents
Part I
that is not closely related to AB’s historical business of providing research and diversified investment management and related services to its clients. A new line of business is “substantial” when a partnership derives more than 15% of its gross income from, or uses more than 15% (by value) of its total assets in, the new line of business.
To preserve AB’s status as a private partnership for federal income tax purposes, AB Units must not be considered publicly traded.
If either or both AB Holding and AB were taxable as a corporation, the return on investment to Unitholders generally would be reduced because distributions to Unitholders generally would be subject to two layers of taxation: first, amounts available for distribution would be subject to federal (and applicable state and local) taxes at the corporate entity level; and second, Unitholders generally would be subject to federal (and applicable state and local) taxes upon receipt of dividends.
AB Holding and AB are subject to the 4.0% New York City unincorporated business tax (“UBT”). AB Holding may net credits for UBT paid by AB.
Changes in tax law governing us or an increase in business activities outside the U.S. could have a material impact on us.
Legislative proposals have been or may be introduced that, if enacted, could have a material adverse effect on us. We cannot predict the outcome of such legislative proposals. AB management continues to monitor and assess how any new legislation could affect AB.
Each of AB's non-U.S. corporate subsidiaries generally is subject to taxes in the foreign jurisdiction where it is located. If our business increasingly operates in countries other than the U.S., or if there are changes in tax law or rates of taxation in foreign jurisdictions where our corporate subsidiaries operate, AB's effective tax rate could increase.
If any audit by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") of our income tax returns for any of our taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 results in any adjustments, the IRS may collect any resulting taxes, including any applicable penalties and interest, directly from us, in which case our net income and the cash available for quarterly Unitholder distributions may be substantially reduced.
For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, a "partnership representative" that we designate (a “Partnership Representative”) will have the sole authority to act on our behalf for purposes of, among other things, IRS audits and related proceedings (and any similar state or local audits and proceedings). Any actions taken by us or by the Partnership Representative on our behalf in connection with such audits or proceedings will be binding on us and our Unitholders.
For an audit of a partnership's taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, the IRS, absent an election by the partnership to the contrary (see discussion below), generally determines adjustments at the partnership level in the year in which the audit is resolved.
Generally, we will have the ability to collect any resulting tax liability (and any related interest and penalties) from our Unitholders in accordance with their percentage interests during the year under audit, but there can be no assurance that we will elect to do so or be able to do so under all circumstances. If we do not collect such tax liability from our Unitholders in accordance with their percentage interests in the tax year under audit, our net income and the available cash for quarterly distributions to current Unitholders may be substantially reduced. Accordingly, our current Unitholders may bear some or all of the tax liability resulting from such audit adjustment, even if such Unitholders did not own Units during the tax year under audit. In particular, with respect to AB Holding, our Partnership Representative may, in certain instances, request that any “imputed under-payment” resulting from an audit be adjusted by amounts of certain of our passive losses. If we successfully make such a request, we would have to reduce suspended passive loss carryovers in a manner which is binding on the partners.
In addition, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, we may, but are not required to, make an election to require our Unitholders to take into account on their income tax returns an audit adjustment made to our income tax items, also known as a “push-out” election. This may also require Unitholders to provide certain information to us (possibly including information about the beneficial owners of our Unitholders). Also, a partnership that is a partner of another partnership (such as AB Holding with respect to AB) may elect to have its unitholders take an audit adjustment of the lower-tier partnership into account (i.e., the upper-tier partnership may push adjustments received from the lower-tier partnership through to the partners of the upper-tier partnership). There are several requirements to make a “push-out” election and we may be unable or unwilling to comply with such requirements. If we do not make a “push-out” election, we would be required to pay any tax resulting from the adjustments to our income tax items, and the cash available for distribution to unitholders would be substantially reduced.
Non-U.S. unitholders may be subject to withholding tax on the sale of their AB Units or AB Holding Units, as well as on distributions, and we may be liable for any under-withholding.
Gain or loss from the sale or exchange of a partnership unit by a non-U.S. unitholder is treated as effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business and is subject to U.S. federal income tax to the extent that the non-U.S. unitholder would have had effectively connected gain or loss on a hypothetical sale by the partnership of all of its assets at fair market value as of the date of the sale or exchange of the partnership units. In furtherance of the foregoing, a transferee of a partnership unit is required to withhold a tax equal to 10% of the amount realized on any transfer of such a partnership unit unless an exception applies.
26 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part I
Distributions by a PTP to a non-U.S. unitholder also are subject to U.S. withholding tax if the PTP has effectively connected gross income, gain or loss.
A transferee is not required to withhold tax if it relies on a certification issued by the transferor or the underlying partnership establishing that an exception to withholding applies. If a transferee of AB Units is required to withhold and failed to properly do so, AB would be required to withhold on distributions to the transferee to satisfy that liability.
A broker is not required to withhold on the transfer of an interest in a PTP or on a distribution by a PTP if the PTP certifies that the "10% exception" applies. This exception applies if, either (1) the PTP was not engaged in a U.S. trade or business during a specified time period, or (2) upon a hypothetical sale of the PTP's assets at fair market value, (i) the amount of net gain that would have been effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the U.S. would be less than 10% of the total net gain, or (ii) no gain would have been effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the U.S.
To make this certification, the PTP must issue a "qualified notice" indicating that it qualifies for this exception, which we have done and intend to continue to do. The qualified notice must state the amount of a distribution that is attributable to each type of income group specified in the Treasury Regulations. The PTP must post each qualified notice on its primary public website (and keep it accessible for 10 years) and deliver it to any registered holder that is a nominee. A broker may not rely on such a certification if it has actual knowledge that the certification is incorrect or unreliable.
As a PTP, AB Holding may be liable for any under-withholding by a broker that relies on a qualified notice for which we failed to make a reasonable estimate of the amounts required for determining the applicability of the 10% exception.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Neither AB nor AB Holding has unresolved comments from the staff of the SEC to report.
Item 1C. Cybersecurity
Cyber Risk Management and Strategy
We rely on digital technology to conduct our business operations and engage with our clients, business partners and employees. The technology that we, our clients, business partners and employees rely upon becomes more complex over time as do threats to our business operations from cyber intrusions, denial of service attacks, manipulation and other cyber misconduct. Information Security is an ongoing process of exercising the due care necessary to protect corporate, client and employee information and systems from unauthorized access, destruction, disclosure, disruption and modification of use.
Through a combination of security, risk and compliance resources, AB implements Information Security through a dedicated Information Security Program ("ISP") that is intended to identify, assess and manage material risks from cybersecurity threats and which includes a focus on safeguarding information and assets from cyber threats, engaging in cyber threat monitoring and responding to actual or potential cyber incidents. Our ISP is led by our Chief Information Security Officer ("CISO") who actively partners with our Chief Compliance Officer ("CCO") and Chief Risk Officer "("CRO"). Ultimately, our ISP is part of our full enterprise risk framework, which includes information technology, business continuity and resiliency, in addition to cybersecurity risk. Our ISP is coordinated with our broader risk management team, including our Chief Security Officer. Enterprise risk, including cybersecurity risk, is overseen by the Audit and Risk Committee on behalf of the Board.
Our CISO, with assistance from internal and external resources, is responsible for implementing and providing oversight of our ISP. The ISP employs a defense-in-depth strategy: an information assurance concept in which multiple layers of security controls are distributed throughout an operating environment. The concept manages risk with diverse defensive strategies, so that if one layer of defense fails, another later of defense will attempt to compensate. Our ISP features cybersecurity policies, standards and guidelines, committee governance, training, access controls and data controls. We periodically execute table top exercises as a part of our ISP program.
Table of Contents
Part I
Our ISP, together with our risk and compliance resources, proactively manage the risk of threat from cybersecurity incidents through (i) implementing protocols to take cybersecurity considerations into account in adopting and onboarding our technology resources, (ii) monitoring IT controls to better ensure compliance with cybersecurity and other related legal and regulatory requirements, (iii) assessing adherence by critical and material third parties we partner with to ensure that the appropriate risk management standards are met, (iv) ensuring essential business functions remain available during a business disruption, and (v) regularly developing and updating response plans to address potential IT or cyber incidents should they occur. Our security, risk and compliance resources are designed to prioritize IT and cybersecurity risk areas, identify solutions that minimize such risks, pursue optimal outcomes and maintain compliance standards. We also maintain an operational security function that has a real time response capability that triages potential incidents and triggers impact mitigation protocols. Additionally, we utilize third parties to conduct periodic cybersecurity assessments and our internal audit function includes certain cyber risk audits as part of its overall risk audit. We review the recommendations and findings from those assessments and audits and implement corrective and other measures as appropriate. Our cybersecurity processes rely predominantly on internal resources, but also include important third party resources for certain matters, including the aforementioned assessments as well as our continuous cybersecurity threat monitoring and initial incident reporting system.
As part of our ISP, we also perform cyber risk assessments on our critical and material third party vendors during onboarding, then periodically thereafter.
We have not had a cybersecurity incident that has materially affected, or was reasonably likely to, materially affect our business strategy, results of operations or financial condition. There are risks from cybersecurity threats that if they were to occur could materially affect our business strategy, results of operations or financial condition, including those discussed in Item 1A Risk Factors - Operations, Technology and Cyber-Related Risks although we do not currently believe that such a result is reasonably likely.
Cyber Risk Governance
The Audit and Risk Committee is responsible for assisting the Board with oversight of our enterprise risk framework, including cybersecurity, information security, information technology and business continuity and resiliency. Our CISO and other members of senior management including our General Counsel, CCO and CRO report quarterly to the Audit and Risk Committee at its regular meetings on the status of the Company's cybersecurity risk, risk management policies and risk assessment initiatives. the full Board is updated on an as needed basis. In the event of an immediate cyber threat to our business operations, our ISP would involve our General Counsel, who would promptly notify the Chairperson of the Audit and Risk Committee, as to the nature, timing and extent of the threat and our applicable contingency plans would go into effect. Our CRO, in collaboration with our CISO, is responsible for notifying the Audit and Risk Committee of world events or of other significant external events that may pose cybersecurity threats or material risks to our business continuity.
While our Board provides oversight of our cybersecurity risk environment, the ultimate responsibility for our processes for identifying, assessing and managing cybersecurity risks resides with management. Our CISO, with assistance from internal and external resources, is responsible for the implementation and providing oversight to our ISP within the organization and maintaining the appropriate level of expertise to manage and implement cybersecurity policies, programs and strategies. Our CISO has years of applied experience in actively managing cybersecurity and information security programs for large global publicly traded companies with complex and evolving information systems. Management oversight of our ISP is provided by various governance committees including the Operational Risk Oversight Committee, the Information Security Risk Oversight Subcommittee and the Financial Crimes Control Oversight Subcommittee.
Item 2. Properties
Our headquarters is located at 501 Commerce Street, Nashville, Tennessee. We occupy 218,976 square feet of space at this location under a 15-year lease agreement that commenced in the fourth quarter of 2020.
We lease space at our other principal location, 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York pursuant to a lease expiring in 2024. At this location, we currently lease 999,963 square feet of space, within which we currently occupy approximately 512,284 square feet of space and have sub-let approximately 487,679 square feet of space.
Also, we entered into a 20-year lease agreement in New York, New York, at 66 Hudson Boulevard, for 166,015 square feet that commenced in January 2024.
We also lease 50,792 square feet of space in San Antonio, Texas under a lease expiring in 2029.
Additionally, we lease 100,000 square feet of space in Pune, India under a lease expiring in 2033.
We lease more modest amounts of space in 27 other cities in the United States.
28 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part I
Our subsidiaries lease space in 32 cities outside the United States, the most significant of which is a lease in London, England, expiring in 2031, and in Hong Kong, China, under a lease expiring in 2027. In London we currently lease 60,732 square feet of space. In Hong Kong, we currently lease and occupy 35,878 square feet of space.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
With respect to all significant litigation matters, we consider the likelihood of a negative outcome. If we determine the likelihood of a negative outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, we record an estimated loss for the expected outcome of the litigation. Any such accruals are adjusted thereafter as appropriate to reflect changed circumstances. When we are able to do so, we also determine estimates of reasonably possible losses or ranges of reasonably possible losses for such matters, whether in excess of any related accrued liability or where there is no accrued liability, and disclose an estimate of the possible loss or range of losses. However, it is often difficult to predict the outcome or estimate a possible loss or range of loss because litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, particularly when plaintiffs allege substantial or indeterminate damages. Such is particularly the case when the litigation is in its early stages or when the litigation is highly complex or broad in scope. In these cases, we disclose that we are unable to predict the outcome or estimate a possible loss or range of loss. As a result of these types of factors, we are unable, at this time, to estimate the losses that are reasonably possible to be incurred or ranges of such losses with respect to our significant litigation matters.
On December 14, 2022, four individual participants in the Profit Sharing Plan for Employees of AB (the "AB Profit Sharing Plan") filed a class action complaint (the "Complaint") in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against AB, current and former members of the Compensation and Workplace Practices Committee of the Board of Directors, and the Investment and Administrative Committees under the AB Profit Sharing Plan. Plaintiffs, who seek to represent a class of all participants in the AB Profit Sharing Plan from December 14, 2016 to the present, allege that defendants violated their fiduciary duties and engaged in prohibited transactions under ERISA by including proprietary collective investment trusts as investment options offered in the AB Profit Sharing Plan. The Complaint seeks unspecified damages, disgorgement and other equitable relief. AB is prepared to defend itself vigorously against these claims and filed a motion to dismiss on February 24, 2023. While the outcome of this matter currently is not determinable given the matter remains in its early stages, we do not believe this litigation will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
AB may be involved in various other matters, including regulatory inquiries, administrative proceedings and litigation, some of which may allege significant damages. It is reasonably possible that we could incur losses pertaining to these matters, but we cannot currently estimate any such losses.
Management, after consultation with legal counsel, currently believes that the outcome of any individual matter that is pending or threatened, or all of them combined, will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity. However, any inquiry, proceeding or litigation has an element of uncertainty; management cannot determine whether further developments relating to any individual matter that is pending or threatened, or all of them combined, will have a material adverse effect on our results of operation, financial condition or liquidity in any future reporting period.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Table of Contents
Part II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market for AB Holding Units and AB Units; Cash Distributions
AB Holding Units are listed on the NYSE and trade publicly under the ticker symbol “AB". There is no established public trading market for AB Units, which are subject to significant restrictions on transfer. For information about these transfer restrictions, see “Structure-related Risks” in Item 1A.
AB Holding’s principal source of income and cash flow is attributable to its limited partnership interests in AB.
Each of AB Holding and AB distributes on a quarterly basis all of its Available Cash Flow, as defined in the AB Holding Partnership Agreement and the AB Partnership Agreement, respectively, to its Unitholders and the General Partner. For additional information concerning distribution of Available Cash Flow by AB Holding, see Note 2 to AB Holding’s financial statements in Item 8. For additional information concerning distribution of Available Cash Flow by AB, see Note 2 to AB’s consolidated financial statements in Item 8.
On December 29, 2023 (the last trading day of the year), the closing price of an AB Holding Unit on the NYSE was $31.03 per Unit. On December 31, 2023, there were (i) 871 AB Holding Unitholders of record for approximately 112,000 beneficial owners, and (ii) 359 AB Unitholders of record (we do not believe there are substantial additional beneficial owners).
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities
We did not engage in any unregistered sales of our securities during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, except as previously disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 1, 2022 in connection with the acquisition of CarVal Investors L.P.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
Each quarter, AB considers whether to implement a plan to repurchase AB Holding Units pursuant to Rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the Exchange Act. We did not adopt a plan during the fourth quarter of 2023. AB may adopt additional plans in the future to engage in open-market purchases of AB Holding Units to help fund anticipated obligations under the firm’s incentive compensation award program and for other corporate purposes. For additional information about Rule 10b5-1 plans, see “Units Outstanding” in Item 7.
30 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
AB Holding Units bought by us or one of our affiliates during the fourth quarter of 2023 are as follows:
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(1)During the fourth quarter of 2023, AB retained from employees 2,166,396 AB Holding Units to allow them to fulfill statutory withholding tax requirements at the time of distribution of long-term incentive compensation awards.
(2)During the fourth quarter of 2023, AB purchased 186,111 AB Holding Units on the open market pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan to help fund anticipated obligations under our incentive compensation award program.
Table of Contents
Part II
Item 6. [Reserved]
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Executive Overview(1)
Our total Assets Under Management ("AUM") as of December 31, 2023 were $725.2 billion, up $78.8 billion, or 12.2%, during 2023. The increase was driven by market appreciation of $85.8 billion, offset by net outflows of $7.0 billion (reflecting Institutional net outflows of $11.8 billion, offset by Retail net inflows of $3.7 billion and Private Wealth Management net inflows of $1.1 billion).
Institutional AUM increased $19.8 billion, or 6.7%, to $317.1 billion during 2023, primarily due to market appreciation of $31.5 billion, partially offset by net outflows of $11.8 billion. Gross sales decreased $20.4 billion, from $32.2 billion in 2022 to $11.8 billion in 2023. Redemptions and terminations decreased $0.7 billion, from $13.3 billion in 2022 to $12.6 billion in 2023.
Retail AUM increased $43.9 billion, or 18.1%, to $286.8 billion during 2023, primarily due to market appreciation of $40.3 billion and net inflows of $3.7 billion. Gross sales increased $5.2 billion, from $65.9 billion in 2022 to $71.1 billion in 2023. Redemptions and terminations decreased $8.2 billion, from $66.3 billion in 2022 to $58.1 billion in 2023.
Private Wealth Management AUM increased $15.1 billion, or 14.1%, to $121.3 billion during 2023, due to market appreciation of $14.0 billion and net inflows of $1.1 billion. Gross sales increased $1.1 billion, from $17.5 billion in 2022 to $18.6 billion in 2023. Redemptions and terminations increased $1.7 billion, from $15.8 billion in 2022 to $17.5 billion in 2023.
Bernstein Research Services ("BRS") revenue decreased $30.1 million, or 7.2%, in 2023. The decrease was primarily driven by significantly lower global customer trading activity due to the prevailing macro-economic environment. In the fourth quarter of 2022, AB and Société Générale (EURONEXT: GLE, “SocGen”), a leading European bank, announced plans to form a joint venture combining their respective cash equities and research businesses. As a result, the BRS business has been classified as held for sale. For further discussion, see Note 24 Acquisitions and Divestitures to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8.
Our 2023 net revenues of $4.2 billion increased $101.0 million, or 2.5%, compared to net revenues of $4.1 billion in the prior year. The increase was primarily driven by investment gains in the current year compared to investment losses in the prior year (impact of $116.6 million), higher net dividend and interest income of $35.2 million and higher base advisory fees of $4.8 million, partially offset by lower Bernstein Research Services revenue of $30.1 million and lower distribution revenues of $20.9 million.
Our operating expenses of $3.3 billion increased $98.5 million, or 3.0%, compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily driven by higher employee compensation and benefits expenses of $102.5 million, higher interest on borrowings of $36.5 million, higher amortization of intangibles of $20.3 million and higher contingent payment arrangements of $16.3 million, partially offset by lower general and administrative expenses of $60.1 million and lower promotion and servicing expenses of $17.1 million. Our operating income increased $2.6 million, or 0.3%, to $817.7 million from $815.1 million in 2022 and our operating margin decreased to 19.1% in 2023 from 21.5% in 2022.
Market Environment
U.S. Equities
U.S. Equity markets registered strong gains in the final quarter of 2023, buoyed by slowing inflation data and expectations that the U.S. Federal Reserve (the "Fed") has finished its rate hiking cycle and will move towards cuts in 2024. Market breadth improved in the fourth quarter, with share price appreciation moving beyond mega-cap technology stocks. Both the cap-weighted S&P 500 and the equal-weighted S&P 500 returned positive 12% in the fourth quarter (including dividends). Previously lagging segments of the market rebounded, with Small-Caps (market capitalization ranges between $250 million to $2 billion) and Mid-Caps (market capitalization ranges between $2 billion to $10 billion) outperforming Large-Caps (market capitalization above $10 billion) with the Russell 2000 index posting a positive 14% return in the fourth quarter and Value stocks outperforming Growth stocks in the fourth quarter.
1 Percentage change figures are calculated using assets under management rounded to the nearest million, while financial statement amounts are rounded to the nearest hundred thousand.
32 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
Despite the broadening rally in late 2023, annual index returns were largely concentrated within the "Magnificent-7" companies: a term coined for Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, NVIDIA and Tesla which were perceived as the main beneficiaries of the Artificial Intelligence revolution. These seven companies boast the largest market capitalization values in the S&P 500 and account for more than a quarter of the index, disproportionally driving the capitalization-weighted S&P 500's 2023 total return of positive 26% versus positive 14% for the equal-weighted version.
Global and Non-U.S. Equities
Moderating inflation data and peaking interest rates drove nearly unilateral gains beyond U.S. equity markets (MSCI World Index was positive 11.4% in the fourth quarter). Within the Eurozone, annual inflation fell to 2.4% (as of November 2023) from 10.1% a year ago, sending the MSCI European Economic and Monetary Union index 7.8% higher in the fourth quarter. In the U.K., gains were led by Small-Cap and Mid-Cap indices while Large-Cap lagged on account of a strengthening GBP (sterling). Japan's TOPIX trading index posted a positive 2.0% total return despite a volatile quarter and overall Emerging Market equities were strong in the fourth quarter, albeit lagging Developed Markets. All markets in the MSCI Asia (ex Japan) index ended the quarter positively, apart from China, where lackluster growth continues to be a drag on asset prices.
Global Bonds
Fixed income markets experienced their strongest quarterly performance in over 20 years, as indicated by the Bloomberg Global Aggregate indices. This was primarily driven by a perceived shift in monetary policy direction, with expectations of rate cuts replacing the previous "higher-for-longer" narrative. As a result, government bond yields fell significantly, and credit markets outperformed government bonds. The Fed maintained its rates throughout the quarter, but a more dovish tone in December accelerated the market rally. The revised dot plot, which plots the Federal Open Market Committee's ("FOMC") projections for the federal funds rate, now anticipates three rate cuts in 2024, up from the previous expectation of two. The FOMC appears more comfortable with the progress made in bringing inflation back towards the target, as indicated by positive news on the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index, which is the Fed's most closely watched measure.
Relationship with EQH and its Subsidiaries
EQH (our parent company) and its subsidiaries are our largest client. EQH is collaborating with AB in order to improve the risk-adjusted yield for the General Accounts of EQH's insurance subsidiaries by investing additional assets at AB, including the utilization of AB's higher-fee, longer-duration alternative offerings. In mid-2021, Equitable Financial Life Insurance Company, a subsidiary of EQH ("Equitable Financial"), agreed to provide an initial $10 billion in permanent capital to build out AB's private illiquid offerings, including private alternatives and private placements. Deployment of this capital commitment is approximately 90% completed and is expected to continue over the next year. In addition, during the second quarter of 2023, EQH committed to provide an additional $10 billion in permanent capital, which will begin following the completion of the initial $10 billion commitment. We expect this anticipated capital from Equitable Financial will continue to accelerate both organic and inorganic growth in our private alternatives business, allowing us to continue to deliver for our clients, employees, unitholders and other stakeholders. For example, included in the initial $10 billion commitment by EQH is $750 million in capital to be deployed through AB CarVal.
Permanent capital means investment capital of indefinite duration, for which commitments may be withdrawn under certain conditions. Such conditions primarily include potential regulatory restrictions, lacking sufficient liquidity to fund the capital commitments to AB and AB's inability to identify attractive investment opportunities which align with the investment strategy. Although EQH’s insurance subsidiaries have indicated their intention over time to provide this investment capital to AB, they have no binding commitment to do so. While the withdrawal of their commitment could potentially slow down our introduction of certain products, the impact to our overall operations would not be material.
Relocation Strategy
As previously announced, we have established our corporate headquarters in Nashville, TN, at 501 Commerce Street. Our Nashville headquarters houses Finance, IT, Operations, Legal, Compliance, Internal Audit, Human Capital, and Sales and Marketing, and at year-end 2023 we had 1,048 employees in Nashville. We will continue to maintain a principal location in New York City, which houses our Portfolio Management, Sell-Side Research and Trading, and New York-based Private Wealth Management businesses.
We believe relocating our corporate headquarters to Nashville affords us the opportunity to provide an improved quality of life alternative for our employees and enables us to attract and recruit new talented employees to a highly desirable location while improving the long-term cost structure of the firm.
During the transition period, which began in 2018 and is expected to continue through 2024, we currently estimate that we will incur transition costs of between $145 million to $155 million. These costs include employee relocation, severance, recruitment, and overlapping compensation and occupancy costs. Over this same period, we expect to realize total expense savings of between $205 million to $215 million. However, we did incur some transition costs before we began to realize
Table of Contents
Part II
expense savings. For the period beginning in 2018 and ending in the fourth quarter of 2023, we incurred $140 million of cumulative transition costs compared to $175 million of cumulative savings. We incurred $20 million of transition costs for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023, compared to $43 million of expense savings, resulting in an overall net savings of $23 million for the period. In 2023, our net income per unit ("EPU") increased $0.08 as a result of our relocation strategy, which compares to the $0.07 EPU increase that occurred in 2022. We also expect to achieve EPU accretion in each future year. Beginning in 2025, once the transition period has been completed, we estimate ongoing annual expense savings of approximately $75 million, which will result from a combination of occupancy and compensation-related savings. Our estimates for both the transition costs and the corresponding expense savings are based on our current assumptions of employee relocation costs, severance, and overlapping compensation and occupancy costs. In addition, our estimates for both the timing of when we incur transition costs and realize the related expense savings are based on our current relocation implementation plan and the timing for execution of each phase. The actual total charges we eventually record, the related expense savings we realize, and the timing of EPU impact may differ from our current estimates as we implement each phase of our headquarters relocation.
During October 2018, we signed a lease, which commenced in the fourth quarter of 2020, relating to 218,976 square feet of space at our new Nashville headquarters. Our estimated total base rent obligation (excluding taxes, operating expenses and utilities) over the 15-year initial lease term is $134 million.
Although we have presented many of our transition costs and annual expense savings with numerical specificity, and we believe these targets to be reasonable as of the date of this report, the uncertainties surrounding the assumptions we discuss above create a significant risk that these targets may not be achieved. Accordingly, the expenses we actually incur and the savings we actually realize may differ from our targets, particularly if actual events adversely differ from one or more of our key assumptions. The transition costs and expense savings, together with their underlying assumptions, are Forward-Looking Statements and can be affected by any of the factors discussed in “Risk Factors” and “Cautions Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in this 2023 10-K. We strongly caution investors not to place undue reliance on any of these assumptions or our cost and expense targets. Except as may be required by applicable securities laws, we are not under any obligation, and we expressly disclaim any obligation, to update or alter any assumptions, estimates, financial goals, targets, projections or other related statements that we may make.
AB Holding
AB Holding’s principal source of income and cash flow is attributable to its investment in AB Units. The AB Holding financial statements, notes to the financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with those of AB.
Results of Operations
Years Ended December 31 % Change
(in thousands, except per unit amounts)
Weighted average equity ownership interest 39.2 % 36.7 % 36.2 %
(1)Distributions reflect the impact of AB’s non-GAAP adjustments.
AB Holding had net income of $264.2 million in 2023 compared to $274.2 million in 2022, reflecting lower net income attributable to AB Unitholders, partially offset by higher weighted average equity ownership interest. AB Holding had net income of $274.2 million in 2022 compared to $385.8 million in 2021, reflecting lower net income attributable to AB Unitholders, partially offset by higher weighted average equity ownership interest.
AB Holding's partnership gross income is derived from its interest in AB. AB Holding’s income taxes, which reflect a 3.5% federal tax on its partnership gross income from the active conduct of a trade or business, are computed by multiplying certain AB qualifying revenues by AB Holding’s ownership interest in AB, multiplied by the 3.5% tax rate. Certain AB qualifying revenues are primarily U.S. investment advisory fees, research payments and brokerage commissions. AB Holding’s effective tax rate was 11.9% in 2023, 10.3% in 2022 and 7.3% in 2021. The increase in AB Holdings effective tax rate is primarily due to the
34 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
increase in the weighted average equity ownership interest. See Note 6 to AB Holding’s financial statements in Item 8for a further description.
As supplemental information, AB provides the performance measures “adjusted net revenues,” “adjusted operating income” and “adjusted operating margin,” which are the principal metrics management uses in evaluating and comparing the period-to-period operating performance of AB. Management principally uses these metrics in evaluating performance because they present a clearer picture of AB's operating performance and allow management to see long-term trends without the distortion primarily caused by long-term incentive compensation-related mark-to-market adjustments, acquisition-related expenses, interest expense and other adjustment items. Similarly, management believes that these management operating metrics help investors better understand the underlying trends in AB's results and, accordingly, provide a valuable perspective for investors. Such measures are not based on generally accepted accounting principles (“non-GAAP measures”).
We provide the non-GAAP measures "adjusted net income" and "adjusted diluted net income per unit" because our quarterly distribution per unit is typically our adjusted diluted net income per unit (which is derived from adjusted net income).
These non-GAAP measures are provided in addition to, and not as substitutes for, net revenues, operating income and operating margin, and they may not be comparable to non-GAAP measures presented by other companies. Management uses both GAAP and non-GAAP measures in evaluating the company’s financial performance. The non-GAAP measures alone may pose limitations because they do not include all of AB’s revenues and expenses. Further, adjusted diluted net income per AB Holding Unit is not a liquidity measure and should not be used in place of cash flow measures. See “Management Operating Metrics” in this Item 7.
The impact of these adjustments on AB Holding’s net income and diluted net income per AB Holding Unit are as follows:
Years Ended December 31
(in thousands, except per unit amounts)
AB Income tax (expense) benefit on non-GAAP adjustments (2,786) (6,395) 71
Impact on AB Holding’s net income of AB non-GAAP adjustments 39,355 25,468 1,098
Diluted net income per AB Holding Unit, GAAP basis $ 2.34 $ 2.69 $ 3.88
Impact of AB non-GAAP adjustments 0.35 0.25 0.01
Adjusted diluted net income per AB Holding Unit $ 2.69 $ 2.94 $ 3.89
The degree to which AB’s non-GAAP adjustments impact AB Holding’s net income fluctuates based on AB Holding's ownership percentage in AB.
Tax Legislation
For a discussion of tax legislation, see “Risk Factors - Structure-related Risks” in Item 1A.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
During the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash provided by operating activities was $294.0 million, compared to $362.6 million during the corresponding 2022 period. The decrease primarily resulted from lower cash distributions received from AB of $64.6 million. During the year ended December 31, 2022, net cash provided by operating activities was $362.6 million, compared to $355.1 million during the corresponding 2021 period. The increase primarily resulted from higher cash distributions received from AB of $9.3 million.
During the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, net cash used in investing activities was zero, $1.8 million and $3.4 million, respectively, reflecting investments in AB with proceeds from exercises of compensatory options to buy AB Holding Units and capital contributions to AB.
2 Includes all AB non-GAAP adjustments to pre-tax income.
Table of Contents
Part II
During the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash used in financing activities was $294.0 million, compared to $360.8 million during the corresponding 2022 period. The decrease was primarily due to lower cash distributions to Unitholders of $64.9 million and higher capital contributions from AB of $2.2 million. During the year ended December 31, 2022, net cash used in financing activities was $360.8 million, compared to $351.7 million during the corresponding 2021 period. The increase was due to cash distributions to Unitholders of $3.5 million and proceeds from exercise of compensatory options to buy AB Holding Units of $3.2 million, offset by lower capital contributions from AB of $2.3 million.
Management believes that AB Holding will have the resources it needs to meet its financial obligations as a result of the cash flow AB Holding realizes from its investment in AB. AB Holding’s cash inflow is comprised entirely of distributions from AB. These distributions are subsequently distributed (net of taxes paid) in their entirety to AB Holding’s Unitholders. As a result, AB Holding has no liquidity risk as it only pays distributions to AB Holding’s Unitholders to the extent of distributions received from AB (net of taxes paid).
Cash Distributions
AB Holding is required to distribute all of its Available Cash Flow, as defined in the AB Holding Partnership Agreement, to its Unitholders (including the General Partner). Available Cash Flow typically is the adjusted diluted net income per unit for the quarter multiplied by the number of units outstanding at the end of the quarter. Management anticipates that Available Cash Flow will continue to be based on adjusted diluted net income per unit, unless management determines, with concurrence of the Board of Directors, that one or more adjustments made to adjusted net income should not be made with respect to the Available Cash Flow calculation. See Note 2 to AB Holding’s financial statements in Item 8 for a description of Available Cash Flow.
Commitments and Contingencies
For a discussion of commitments and contingencies, see Note 7 to AB Holding’s financial statements in Item 8.
AB
Assets Under Management
Assets under management by distribution channel are as follows:
As of December 31 % Change
(in billions)
36 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
Assets under management by investment service are as follows:
As of December 31 % Change
(in billions)
Equity
Fixed Income
Actively Managed
Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions(2)
(1)Includes index and enhanced index services.
(2)Includes certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity or fixed income services.
Table of Contents
Part II
Changes in assets under management during 2023 and 2022 are as follows:
Distribution Channel
Institutions Retail PrivateWealthManagement Total
(in billions)
Long-term flows:
Cash flow/unreinvested dividends (11.0) (9.3) — (20.3)
Net long-term (outflows) inflows (11.8) 3.7 1.1 (7.0)
Transfers 0.1 (0.1) — —
Long-term flows:
Cash flow/unreinvested dividends (12.6) (11.2) — (23.8)
Net long-term inflows (outflows)(1) 6.3 (11.6) 1.7 (3.6)
Adjustments(2) (0.4) — — (0.4)
Transfers (0.1) 0.1 — —
(1)Net flows include $4.5 billion of AXA redemptions for 2022.
(2)Approximately $0.4 billion of Institutional AUM was removed from our total assets under management during the second quarter of 2022 due to a change in the fee structure.
(3)The CarVal acquisition added approximately $12.2 billion of Institutional AUM in the third quarter of 2022.
38 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
Investment Service
(in billions)
Long-term flows:
Long-term flows:
Adjustments(4) — — — — — (0.4) (0.4)
(1)Includes index and enhanced index services.
(2)Includes certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity or fixed income services.
(3)Net flows include $4.5 billion of AXA redemptions for 2022.
(4)Approximately $0.4 billion of Institutional AUM was removed from our total assets under management during the second quarter of 2022 due to a change in the fee structure.
(5)The CarVal acquisition added approximately $12.2 billion of Institutional AUM in the third quarter of 2022.
Table of Contents
Part II
Net long-term (outflows) inflows for actively managed investment services as compared to passively managed investment services during 2023 and 2022 are as follows:
Years Ended December 31
(in billions)
Actively Managed
Alternatives/Multi- Asset Solutions (2.0) 20.9
Passively Managed
Fixed Income 1.5 (1.3)
Alternatives/Multi- Asset Solutions 0.7 2.1
Total net long-term (outflows) $ (7.0) $ (3.6)
Average assets under management by distribution channel and investment service are as follows:
Years Ended December 31 % Change
(in billions)
Distribution Channel:
Investment Service:
(1)Includes index and enhanced index services.
(2)Includes certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity or fixed income services.
40 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
During 2023, our Institutional channel average AUM of $304.6 billion decreased $3.8 billion, or 1.2%, compared to 2022, while ending AUM increased $19.8 billion, or 6.7%, to $317.1 billion from December 31, 2022. The $19.8 billion increase in AUM resulted primarily from market appreciation of $31.5 billion (with $22.7 billion of market appreciation occurring in the fourth quarter of 2023), partially offset by net outflows of $11.8 billion. During 2022, our Institutional channel average AUM of $308.4 billion decreased $17.3 billion, or 5.3%, compared to 2021, primarily due to this AUM decreasing $39.8 billion, or 11.8%, to $297.3 billion from December 31, 2021. The $39.8 billion decrease in AUM resulted primarily from market depreciation of $57.8 billion, partially offset by an addition of $12.2 billion due to the acquisition of CarVal and net inflows of $6.3 billion.
During 2023, our Retail channel average AUM of $262.0 billion decreased $5.8 billion, or 2.1%, compared to 2022, while ending AUM increased $43.9 billion, or 18.1%, to $286.8 billion from December 31, 2022. The $43.9 billion increase in AUM resulted primarily from market appreciation of $40.3 billion (with $26.3 billion of market appreciation occurring in the fourth quarter of 2023) and net inflows of $3.7 billion. During 2022, our Retail channel average AUM of $267.8 billion decreased $23.2 billion, or 8.0%, compared to 2021, primarily due to this AUM decreasing $77.0 billion, or 24.1%, to $242.9 billion from December 31, 2021. The $77.0 billion decrease in AUM resulted primarily from market depreciation of $65.5 billion and net outflows of $11.6 billion.
During 2023, our Private Wealth Management channel average AUM of $113.7 billion increased $3.4 billion, or 3.0%, compared to 2022, primarily due to this AUM increasing $15.1 billion, or 14.1%, to $121.3 billion from December 31, 2022. The $15.1 billion increase in AUM resulted from market appreciation of $14.0 billion (with $9.0 billion of market appreciation occurring in the fourth quarter of 2023) and net inflows of $1.1 billion. During 2022, our Private Wealth Management channel average AUM of $110.3 billion decreased $3.8 billion, or 3.3%, compared to 2021, primarily due to this AUM decreasing $15.4 billion, or 12.6%, to $106.2 billion from December 31, 2021. The $15.4 billion decrease in AUM resulted from market depreciation of $17.1 billion, offset by net inflows of $1.7 billion.
Absolute investment composite returns, gross of fees, and relative performance as of December 31, 2023 compared to benchmarks for certain representative Institutional equity and fixed income services are as follows:
1-Year 3-Year(1) 5-Year(1)
Income - Hedged (fixed income)
Absolute return 9.7% (0.8%) 3.3%
High Income (fixed income)
Relative return (vs. Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index) 1.4 1.1 0.6
Global Plus - Hedged (fixed income)
Intermediate Municipal Bonds (fixed income)
Relative return (vs. Lipper Short/Int. Blended Muni Fund Avg) 0.9 0.7 0.8
U.S. Strategic Core Plus (fixed income)
Relative return (vs. Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index) 0.6 0.4 0.5
Emerging Market Debt (fixed income)
Relative return (vs. JPM EMBI Global/JPM EMBI) 2.2 (0.3) 0.3
Table of Contents
Part II
1-Year 3-Year(1) 5-Year(1)
Sustainable Global Thematic
Relative return (vs. MSCI ACWI Index) (5.2) (3.6) 2.7
International Strategic Core Equity
Relative return (vs. MSCI EAFE Index) (1.6) (0.4) (0.9)
U.S. Small & Mid Cap Value
Relative return (vs. Russell 2500 Value Index) 2.0 2.3 0.9
U.S. Strategic Value
Relative return (vs. Russell 1000 Value Index) 8.2 4.1 1.2
U.S. Small Cap Growth
Relative return (vs. Russell 2000 Growth Index) 0.5 (3.2) 2.4
U.S. Large Cap Growth
Relative return (vs. Russell 1000 Growth Index) (6.8) (0.9) (1.3)
U.S. Small & Mid Cap Growth
Relative return (vs. Russell 2500 Growth Index) 0.8 (2.1) (0.5)
Concentrated U.S. Growth
Relative return (vs. S&P 500 Index) (6.9) (3.4) —
Select U.S. Equity
Relative return (vs. S&P 500 Index) (6.2) 1.1 0.1
Strategic Equities
Relative return (vs. Russell 3000 Index) (0.2) 0.9 (0.2)
Global Core Equity
Relative return (vs. MSCI ACWI Index) (1.2) (0.6) (1.0)
U.S. Strategic Core Equity
Relative return (vs. S&P 500 Index) (5.2) 1.2 (1.2)
Select U.S. Equity Long/Short
Relative return (vs. S&P 500 Index) (13.6) (2.9) (5.4)
Global Strategic Core Equity
Relative return (vs. S&P 500 Index) (4.0) 1.7 (0.9)
(1)Reflects annualized returns.
42 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
Consolidated Results of Operations
Years Ended December 31 % Change
(in thousands, except per unit amounts)
(1)Operating income excluding net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests as a percentage of net revenues.
Net income attributable to AB Unitholders for the year ended December 31, 2023 decreased $67.2 million from the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease primarily is due to (in millions):
Higher employee compensation and benefits $ (102.5)
Higher interest on borrowings (36.5)
Lower Bernstein Research Services revenue (30.1)
Lower distribution revenues (20.9)
Higher amortization of intangible assets (20.3)
Higher contingent payment arrangements (16.3)
Higher investment gains 116.6
Lower general and administrative expenses 60.1
Higher net dividend and interest income 35.2
Lower promotion and servicing expenses 17.1
Lower income taxes 10.6
Table of Contents
Part II
Net income attributable to AB Unitholders for the year ended December 31, 2022 decreased $316.8 million from the year ended December 31, 2021. The decrease primarily was due to (in millions):
Lower base advisory fees $ (123.6)
Higher investment losses (101.8)
Lower performance-based fees (99.9)
Higher general and administrative expenses (86.0)
Lower distribution revenues (45.0)
Lower Bernstein Research Services revenue (35.7)
Lower promotion and servicing expenses 60.1
Lower employee compensation and benefits 49.4
Units Outstanding
Each quarter, we consider whether to implement a plan to repurchase AB Holding Units pursuant to Rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). A plan of this type allows a company to repurchase its shares at times when it otherwise might be prevented from doing so because of self-imposed trading blackout periods or because it possesses material non-public information. Each broker we select has the authority to repurchase AB Holding Units on our behalf in accordance with the terms and limitations specified in the plan. Repurchases are subject to regulations promulgated by the SEC, as well as certain price, market volume and timing constraints specified in the plan. There was no plan adopted during the fourth quarter of 2023. We may adopt additional plans in the future to engage in open-market purchases of AB Holding Units to help fund anticipated obligations under our incentive compensation award program and for other corporate purposes.
Cash Distributions
We are required to distribute all of our Available Cash Flow, as defined in the AB Partnership Agreement, to our Unitholders and the General Partner. Available Cash Flow typically is the adjusted diluted net income per unit for the quarter multiplied by the number of general and limited partnership interests at the end of the quarter. In future periods, management anticipates that Available Cash Flow will continue to be based on adjusted diluted net income per unit, unless management determines, with concurrence of the Board of Directors, that one or more adjustments that are made for adjusted net income should not be made with respect to the Available Cash Flow calculation. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements contained in Item 8 for a description of Available Cash Flow.
Management Operating Metrics
We are providing the non-GAAP measures “adjusted net revenues,” “adjusted operating income” and “adjusted operating margin” because they are the principal operating metrics management uses in evaluating and comparing period-to-period operating performance. Management principally uses these metrics in evaluating performance because they present a clearer picture of our operating performance and allow management to see long-term trends without the distortion primarily caused by long-term incentive compensation-related mark-to-market adjustments, acquisition-related expenses, interest expense and other adjustment items. Similarly, we believe that these management operating metrics help investors better understand the underlying trends in our results and, accordingly, provide a valuable perspective for investors.
These non-GAAP measures are provided in addition to, and not as substitutes for, net revenues, operating income and operating margin, and they may not be comparable to non-GAAP measures presented by other companies. Management uses both accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("US GAAP") and non-GAAP measures in evaluating our financial performance. The non-GAAP measures alone may pose limitations because they do not include all of our revenues and expenses.
44 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
Years Ended December 31
(in thousands)
Adjustments:
Distribution-related adjustments:
Pass-through adjustments:
Write-down of investment — — 1,880
Adjustments:
Write-down of investment — — 1,880
Diluted net income per AB Unit, GAAP basis $ 2.65 $ 3.01 $ 4.18
Adjusted diluted net income per AB Unit $ 3.00 $ 3.26 $ 4.20
Operating margin, GAAP basis 19.1% 21.5% 27.3%
Impact of non-GAAP adjustments 9.1 7.4 6.5
1.During the second quarter of 2023, we revised adjusted operating income to exclude interest on borrowings in order to align with our industry peer group. We have recast prior periods presentation to align with the current period presentation.
Adjusted operating income for the year ended December 31, 2023 decreased $13.9 million, or 1.4%, from the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily due to higher employee compensation and benefits expense of $39.3 million, lower Bernstein Research Services revenue of $30.1 million, lower investment advisory base fees of $25.1 million and higher general and administrative expenses of $6.2 million, partially offset by higher net dividend and interest income of $51.6 million and higher performance-based fees of $35.5 million.
Adjusted operating income for the year ended December 31, 2022 decreased $254.4 million, or 20.9%, from the year ended December 31, 2021, primarily due to lower performance-based fees of $130.9 million, lower investment advisory base fees of
Table of Contents
Part II
$99.1 million, lower Bernstein Research Services revenue of $35.7 million and higher general and administrative expenses of $32.3 million, partially offset by lower employee compensation and benefits expense of $58.4 million.
Adjusted Net Revenues
Net Revenue, as adjusted, is reduced to exclude all of the company's distribution revenues, which are recorded as a separate line item on the consolidated statement of income, as well as a portion of investment advisory services fees received that is used to pay distribution and servicing costs. For certain products, based on the distinct arrangements, certain distribution fees are collected by us and passed through to third-party client intermediaries, while for certain other products, we collect investment advisory services fees and a portion is passed through to third-party client intermediaries. In both arrangements, the third-party client intermediary owns the relationship with the client and is responsible for performing services and distributing the product to the client on our behalf. We believe offsetting distribution revenues and certain investment advisory services fees is useful for our investors and other users of our financial statements because such presentation appropriately reflects the nature of these costs as pass-through payments to third parties that perform functions on behalf of our sponsored mutual funds and/or shareholders of these funds. Distribution-related adjustments fluctuate each period based on the type of investment products sold, as well as the average AUM over the period. Also, we adjust distribution revenues for the amortization of deferred sales commissions as these costs, over time, will offset such revenues.
We adjust investment advisory and services fees and other revenues for pass through costs, primarily related to our transfer agent and shareholder servicing fees. Also, we adjust for certain performance-based fees passed through to our investment advisors. These fees do not affect operating income, as such, we exclude these fees from adjusted net revenues.
We adjust for the revenue impact of consolidating company-sponsored investment funds by eliminating the consolidated company-sponsored investment funds' revenues and including AB's fees from such consolidated company-sponsored investment funds and AB's investment gains and losses on its investments in such consolidated company-sponsored investment funds that were eliminated in consolidation.
Adjusted net revenues exclude investment gains and losses and dividends and interest on employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments. Also, we adjust for certain acquisition-related pass-through performance-based fees and performance related compensation.
During the fourth quarter of 2021, we wrote down an equity method investment; this write-down brought the investment balance to zero.
Adjusted Operating Income
Adjusted operating income represents operating income on a US GAAP basis excluding (1) real estate charges (credits), (2) the impact on net revenues and compensation expense of the investment gains and losses (as well as the dividends and interest) associated with employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments, (3) the equity compensation paid by EQH to certain AB executives, as discussed below, (4) the write-down of investments (discussed immediately above), (5) acquisition-related expenses, (6) interest on borrowings and (7) the impact of consolidated company-sponsored investment funds.
Real estate charges (credits) incurred during the fourth quarter of 2019 through the fourth quarter of 2020, while excluded in the period in which the charges (credits) were recorded, are included ratably over the remaining applicable lease term.
Prior to 2009, a significant portion of employee compensation was in the form of long-term incentive compensation awards that were notionally invested in AB investment services and generally vested over a period of four years. AB economically hedged the exposure to market movements by purchasing and holding these investments on its balance sheet. All such investments had vested as of year-end 2012 and the investments have been delivered to the participants, except for those investments with respect to which the participant elected a long-term deferral. Fluctuation in the value of these investments, which also impacts compensation expense, is recorded within investment gains and losses on the income statement. Management believes it is useful to reflect the offset achieved from economically hedging the market exposure of these investments in the calculation of adjusted operating income and adjusted operating margin. The non-GAAP measures exclude gains and losses and dividends and interest on employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments included in revenues and compensation expense.
The board of directors of EQH granted to Seth Bernstein, our CEO, equity awards in connection with EQH's IPO. Additionally, equity awards were granted to Mr. Bernstein and other AB executivesfor their membership on the EQH Management Committee. These individuals may receive additional equity or cash compensation from EQH in the future related to their service on the Management Committee. Any awards granted to these individuals by EQH are recorded as compensation expense in AB’s consolidated statement of income. The compensation expense associated with these awards has been excluded from our non-GAAP measures because they are non-cash and are based upon EQH's, and not AB's, financial performance.
46 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
The write-down of investments discussed above in Adjusted Net Revenues have been excluded due to their non-recurring nature and because they are not part of our core operating results.
Acquisition-related expenses have been excluded because they are not considered part of our core operating results when comparing financial results from period to period and to industry peers. Acquisition-related expenses include professional fees and the recording of changes in estimates to contingent payment arrangements associated with our acquisitions. Beginning in the first quarter of 2022, acquisition-related expenses also include certain compensation-related expenses, amortization of intangible assets for contracts acquired and accretion expense with respect to contingent payment arrangements. During 2023, 2022 and 2021, acquisition related expenses included an intangible asset impairment charge of zero, $5.6 million and $1.0 million, respectively, related to various historical acquisitions.
The recording of changes in estimates of contingent consideration payable with respect to contingent payment arrangements associated with our acquisitions are not considered part of our core operating results and, accordingly, have been excluded. During 2023, we recorded an expense of $28.4 million due to a change in estimate related to the contingent consideration associated with the acquisition of Autonomous LLC in 2019. The change in estimate was based upon better than expected revenues during the 2023 performance evaluation period. We recorded $14.1 million as contingent payment arrangement expense and $14.3 million as compensation and benefits expense in the condensed consolidated statement of income. The charges to compensation and benefits expense are due to certain service conditions and special awards included in the acquisition agreement.
We adjust operating income to exclude interest on borrowings in order to align with our industry peer group.
We adjusted for the operating income impact of consolidating certain company-sponsored investment funds by eliminating the consolidated company-sponsored funds' revenues and expenses and including AB's revenues and expenses that were eliminated in consolidation. We also excluded the limited partner interests we do not own.
Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Diluted Net Income per AB Unit
As previously discussed, our quarterly distribution is typically our adjusted diluted net income per unit (which is derived from adjusted net income) for the quarter multiplied by the number of general and limited partnership interests at the end of the quarter. Adjusted income taxes, used in calculating adjusted net income, are calculated using the GAAP effective tax rate adjusted for non-GAAP income tax adjustments.
Adjusted Operating Margin
Adjusted operating margin allows us to monitor our financial performance and efficiency from period to period without the volatility noted above in our discussion of adjusted operating income and to compare our performance to industry peers on a basis that better reflects our performance in our core business. Adjusted operating margin is derived by dividing adjusted operating income by adjusted net revenues.
Table of Contents
Part II
Net Revenues
The components of net revenues are as follows:
Years Ended December 31 % Change
(in thousands)
Investment advisory and services fees:
Institutions:
Retail:
Private Wealth Management:
Total:
Investment Advisory and Services Fees
Investment advisory and services fees are the largest component of our revenues. These fees generally are calculated as a percentage of the value of AUM as of a specified date, or as a percentage of the value of average AUM for the applicable billing period, and vary with the type of investment service, the size of account and the total amount of assets we manage for a particular client. Accordingly, fee income generally increases or decreases as AUM increase or decrease and is affected by market appreciation or depreciation, the addition of new client accounts or client contributions of additional assets to existing accounts, withdrawals of assets from and termination of client accounts, purchases and redemptions of mutual fund shares, shifts of assets between accounts or products with different fee structures, and acquisitions. Our average basis points realized (investment advisory and services fees divided by average AUM) generally approximate 30 to 105 basis points for actively managed equity services, 10 to 65 basis points for actively-managed fixed income services and 1 to 50 basis points for passively managed services. Average basis points realized for other services could range from 3 basis points for certain Institutional third party managed services to over 190 basis points for certain Retail and Private Wealth Management alternative services. These ranges include all-inclusive fee arrangements (covering investment management, trade execution and other services) for our Private Wealth Management clients.
We calculate AUM using established market-based valuation methods and fair valuation (non-observable market) methods. Market-based valuation methods include: last sale/settle prices from an exchange for actively-traded listed equities, options and futures; evaluated bid prices from recognized pricing vendors for fixed income, asset-backed or mortgage-backed issues; mid prices from recognized pricing vendors and brokers for credit default swaps; and quoted bids or spreads from pricing
48 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
vendors and brokers for other derivative products. Fair valuation methods include: discounted cash flow models or any other methodology that is validated and approved by our Valuation Committee and sub-committee (the "Valuation Committee") (see paragraph immediately below for more information regarding our Valuation Committee). Fair valuation methods are used only where AUM cannot be valued using market-based valuation methods, such as in the case of private equity or illiquid securities.
The Valuation Committee, consists of senior officers and employees, which oversees a consistent framework of pricing and valuation of all investments held in client and AB portfolios. The Valuation Committee has adopted a Statement of Pricing Policies describing principles and policies that apply to pricing and valuing investments held in these portfolios. We also have a Pricing Group, which is overseen by the Valuation Committee and is responsible for managing the pricing process for all investments.
We sometimes charge our clients performance-based fees. In these situations, we charge a base advisory fee and are eligible to earn an additional performance-based fee or incentive allocation that is calculated as either a percentage of absolute investment results or a percentage of investment results in excess of a stated benchmark over a specified period of time. Some performance-based fees include a high-watermark provision, which generally provides that if a client account underperforms relative to its performance target (whether absolute or relative to a specified benchmark), it must gain back such underperformance before we can collect future performance-based fees. Therefore, if we fail to achieve our performance target for a particular period, we will not earn a performance-based fee for that period and, for accounts with a high-watermark provision, our ability to earn future performance-based fees will be impaired. We are eligible to earn performance-based fees on 9.3%, 8.3% and 0.4% of the assets we manage for institutional clients, private wealth clients and retail clients, respectively (in total, 5.6% of our AUM).
Our investment advisory and services fees increased by $4.4 million, or 0.1%, in 2023, due to a $4.8 million, or 0.2%, increase in base fees, offset by a $0.3 million decrease in performance-based fees. The increase in base fees is primarily due to slight shift in product mix to alternatives, which generally earn higher fees, partially offset by a 0.9% decrease in average AUM. Our investment advisory and services fees decreased by $223.5 million, or 7.0%, in 2022, due to a $123.6 million, or 4.2%, decrease in base fees and a $99.9 million decrease in performance-based fees. The decrease in base fees was primarily due to a 6.1% decrease in average AUM, partially offset by a slight increase in our portfolio fee rate.
Performance-based fees decreased $0.3 million, or 0.2%, in 2023, primarily due to lower performance-based fees earned on U.S. Real Estate fund and Emerging Markets Opportunistic Credit fund, partially offset by higher performance-based fees earned on Private Credit fund, Global Opportunistic Credit fund, Global Multi-Strategy fund and Securitized Assets fund. Performance-based fees decreased $99.9 million, or 40.7%, in 2022, primarily due to lower performance-based fees earned on Financial Services Opportunities fund, U.S. Select Equity fund, Arya Partners fund and Private Credit Services fund, partially offset by higher U.S. Real Estate fund fees.
Institutional base fees increased $30.4 million, or 5.2%, in 2023, primarily due to a higher portfolio fee rate, partially offset by a 1.2% decrease in average AUM. Retail base fees decreased $45.7 million, or 3.5%, in 2023, primarily due to a 2.1% decrease in average AUM. Private Wealth base fees increased $20.1 million, or 2.2%, in 2023, primarily due to a 3.0% increase in average AUM. Institutional base fees increased $41.5 million, or 7.7%, in 2022, primarily due to a higher portfolio fee rate, partially offset by a 5.3% decrease in average AUM. Retail base fees decreased $120.5 million, or 8.4%, in 2022, primarily due to an 8.0% decrease in average AUM. Private Wealth base fees decreased $44.6 million, or 4.6%, in 2022, primarily due to a 3.3% decrease in average AUM.
Bernstein Research Services
We earn revenues for providing investment research to, and executing brokerage transactions for, institutional clients. These clients compensate us principally by directing us to execute brokerage transactions on their behalf, for which we earn commissions, and to a lesser extent, but increasingly, by paying us directly for research through commission sharing agreements or cash payments. In the fourth quarter of 2022, AB and SocGen, a leading European bank, announced plans to form a joint venture combining their respective cash equities and research businesses. As a result, the BRSbusiness has been classified as held for sale. For further discussion, see Note 24 Acquisitions and Divestitures to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8.
Revenues from Bernstein Research Services decreased $30.1 million, or 7.2%, in 2023. The decrease was primarily driven by significantly lower global customer trading activity due to the prevailing macro-economic environment.
Revenues from Bernstein Research Services decreased $35.7 million, or 7.9%, in 2022. The decrease was driven by significantly lower customer trading activity in Europe and Asia due to local market conditions.
Distribution Revenues
Two of our subsidiaries act as distributors and/or placement agents of company-sponsored mutual funds and receive distribution services fees from certain of those funds as full or partial reimbursement of the distribution expenses they incur. Period-over-period fluctuations of distribution revenues typically are in line with fluctuations of the corresponding average AUM of these mutual funds.
Table of Contents
Part II
Distribution revenues decreased $20.9 million, or 3.4%, in 2023, primarily due to a shift in product mix from mutual funds with higher distribution rates to mutual funds with lower distribution rates, as well as a 1.4% decrease in the corresponding average AUM of these mutual funds. Distribution revenues decreased $45.0 million, or 6.9%, in 2022, primarily due to the corresponding average AUM of these mutual funds decreasing 12.4%, partially offset by a shift in product mix from mutual funds with lower distribution rates to mutual funds with higher distribution rates.
Dividend and Interest Income and Interest Expense
Dividend and interest income consists primarily of investment income and interest earned on customer margin balances and U.S. Treasury Bills as well as dividend and interest income in our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds. Interest expense principally reflects interest accrued on cash balances in customers’ brokerage accounts.
Dividend and interest income increased $76.4 million, or 62.0%, in 2023, primarily due to higher interest earned on customer margin balances and higher interest earned on U.S. Treasury Bills. Interest expense increased $41.1 million in 2023, due to higher interest paid on cash balances in customers' brokerage accounts.
Dividend and interest income increased $84.4 million in 2022, primarily due to higher interest earned on customer margin balances, higher interest earned on U.S. Treasury Bills as well as higher dividend and interest income in our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds. Interest expense increased $62.8 million, in 2022, due to higher interest paid on cash balances in customers' brokerage accounts.
50 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
Investment Gains (Losses)
Investment gains (losses) consist primarily of realized and unrealized investment gains or losses on: (i) employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments, (ii) U.S. Treasury Bills, (iii) market-making in exchange-traded options and equities, (iv) seed capital investments, (v) derivatives and (vi) investments in our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds. Investment gains (losses) also include equity in earnings of proprietary investments in limited partnership hedge funds that we sponsor and manage.
Investment gains (losses) are as follows:
Years Ended December 31
(in thousands)
Long-term incentive compensation-related investments:
Investments held by consolidated company-sponsored investment funds:
Seed capital investments:
Realized (losses) gains
Unrealized gains (losses)
Brokerage-related investments:
Other Revenues
Other revenues consist of fees earned for transfer agency services provided to company-sponsored mutual funds, fees earned for administration and recordkeeping services provided to company-sponsored mutual funds and the General Accounts of EQH and its subsidiaries, and other miscellaneous revenues. Other revenues decreased $4.2 million, or 4.0%, in 2023, primarily due to lower shareholder servicing fees and lower brokerage income, partially offset by higher mutual fund reimbursements. Other revenues decreased $2.9 million, or 2.6%, in 2022, primarily due to lower shareholder servicing fees.
Table of Contents
Part II
Expenses
The components of expenses are as follows:
Years Ended December 31 % Change
(in thousands)
Promotion and servicing:
Employee Compensation and Benefits
Employee compensation and benefits consist of base compensation (including salaries and severance), annual short-term incentive compensation awards (cash bonuses), annual long-term incentive compensation awards, commissions, fringe benefits and other employment costs (including recruitment, training, temporary help and meals).
Compensation expense as a percentage of net revenues was 42.6%, 41.1% and 38.6% for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Compensation expense generally is determined on a discretionary basis and is primarily a function of our firm’s current-year financial performance. The amounts of incentive compensation we award are designed to motivate, reward and retain top talent while aligning our executives' interests with the interests of our Unitholders. Senior management, together with the Compensation and Workplace Practices Committee of the Board of Directors of AllianceBernstein Corporation (“Compensation Committee”), continue to believe that the appropriate metric to consider in determining the amount of incentive compensation is the ratio of adjusted employee compensation and benefits expense to adjusted net revenues. Adjusted net revenues used in the adjusted compensation ratio are the same as the adjusted net revenues presented as a non-GAAP measure (discussed earlier in this Item 7). Adjusted employee compensation and benefits expense is total employee compensation and benefits expense minus other employment costs such as recruitment, training, temporary help and meals (which were 1.1%, 1.1% and 0.9% of adjusted net revenues for 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively), and excludes the impact of mark-to-market vesting expense, as well as dividends and interest expense, associated with employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments and the amortization expense associated with the awards issued by EQH to some of our firm's executives relating to their roles as members of the EQH Management Committee. Senior management, with the approval of the Compensation Committee, has established as an objective that adjusted employee compensation and benefits expense, excluding the impact of performance-based fees, generally should not exceed 50% of our adjusted net revenues in any year, except in unexpected or unusual circumstances. Our ratios of adjusted compensation expense as a percentage of adjusted net revenues were 49.0%, 48.4% and 46.5%, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.
In 2023, employee compensation and benefits expense increased $102.5 million, or 6.2%, primarily due to higher base compensation of $72.2 million, higher incentive compensation of $51.7 million and higher fringes of $7.8 million, partially offset by lower commissions of $29.0 million. In 2022, employee compensation and benefits expense decreased $49.4 million, or 2.9%, primarily due to lower incentive compensation of $107.7 million, partially offset by higher base compensation of $39.8 million, higher commissions of $12.7 million and higher other employment costs of $5.3 million.
Promotion and Servicing
Promotion and servicing expenses include distribution-related payments to financial intermediaries for distribution of AB mutual funds and amortization of deferred sales commissions paid to financial intermediaries for the sale of back-end load shares of AB mutual funds. Also included in this expense category are costs related to trade execution and clearance, travel and entertainment, advertising and promotional materials.
52 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
Promotion and servicing expenses decreased $17.1 million, or 1.9%, in 2023. The decrease was due to lower distribution-related payments of $19.2 million, lower trade execution and clearance expenses of $9.0 million and lower transfer fees of $3.0 million, offset by higher travel and entertainment expenses of $8.5 million, higher marketing and communication expenses of $3.5 million and higher amortization of deferred sales commissions of $2.1 million. Promotion and servicing expenses decreased $60.1 million, or 6.4%, in 2022. The decrease was primarily due to lower distribution-related payments of $78.5 million, lower transfer fees of $4.9 million and lower trade execution and clearance expenses of $3.1 million, partially offset by higher travel and entertainment expenses of $15.4 million and higher firm meeting expenses of $8.8 million.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses include portfolio services fees, technology fees, professional fees and office-related expenses (occupancy, communications and similar expenses). General and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues were 14.0%, 15.8% and 12.5% for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. General and administrative expenses decreased $60.1 million, or 9.4%, in 2023. The decrease was primarily due to lower portfolio services fees of $43.7 million, lower professional fees of $18.0 million, lower valuation adjustments related to the classification of Bernstein Research Services as held for sale of $6.0 million and a favorable foreign exchange translation impact of $5.7 million, partially offset by higher office-related expenses of $7.4 million. General and administrative expenses increased $86.0 million, or 15.5%, in 2022. The increase was primarily due to higher professional fees of $27.3 million, higher portfolio services fees of $21.3 million, higher technology fees of $19.1 million, a valuation adjustment of $7.4 million associated with the classification of BRS as held for sale, higher office-related expenses of $6.9 million and a $5.6 million impairment of certain acquisition related intangible assets.
Contingent Payment Arrangements
Contingent payment arrangements reflect changes in estimates of contingent payment liabilities associated with acquisitions in current and previous periods, as well as accretion expense of these liabilities. For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, we recognized $8.8 million, $6.6 million and $3.3 million, respectively, in accretion expense related to our contingent considerations payable. During 2023, we recorded a change in estimate related to the contingent consideration liability associated with the acquisition of Autonomous LLC in 2019 of $14.1 million. The change in estimate was based upon better than expected revenues during the 2023 performance evaluation period. There were no changes in our estimates during the year ended December 31, 2022. During 2021, we recorded a change in estimate related to the contingent consideration liability associated with the acquisition of Ramius Alternative Solutions LLC of $0.6 million. Due to the loss of acquired investment management contracts, the carrying value of the finite-lived intangible assets exceeded the fair value of the contracts. These expenses resulting from changes to expected payments and the accretion of these obligations to their expected payment amounts are reflected within contingent payment arrangements in our consolidated statements of income.
Interest on Borrowings
Interest expense increased $36.5 million in 2023, reflecting higher interest rates on borrowings and higher weighted average borrowings. Average daily borrowings for the EQH facilities and commercial paper were $1,014 million at a weighted average interest rate of 5.1% during 2023 compared to $845.5 million and 1.7% during 2022.
Interest expense increased $12.8 million in 2022, reflecting higher interest rates on borrowings and higher weighted average borrowings. Average daily borrowings for the EQH facilities and commercial paper were $845.5 million at a weighted average interest rate of 1.7% during 2022 compared to $561.6 million and 0.2% during 2021.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Amortization of intangible assets reflects our amortization of costs assigned to acquired investment management contracts with a finite life. These assets are recognized at fair value and generally are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful life. On July 1, 2022, AB acquired CarVal Investors L.P. ("CarVal"), which resulted in recording of $303.0 million of finite-lived intangible assets primarily relating to investment management contracts and investor relationships with useful lives ranging from 5 to 10 years (see Note 24 Acquisitions and Divestitures to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8). Amortization of intangible assets increased $20.3 million in 2023. The increase was primarily due to the acquired intangible assets associated with the CarVal acquisition. Amortization of intangible assets increased $20.9 million in 2022. The increase was primarily due to the acquired intangible assets associated with the CarVal acquisition.
Income Taxes
AB, a private limited partnership, is not subject to federal or state corporate income taxes. However, AB is subject to a 4.0% New York City unincorporated business tax (“UBT”). Our domestic corporate subsidiaries are subject to federal, state and local income taxes, and generally are included in the filing of a consolidated federal income tax return. Separate state and local
Table of Contents
Part II
income tax returns also are filed. Foreign corporate subsidiaries generally are subject to taxes in the jurisdictions where they are located.
Income tax expense decreased $10.6 million, or 26.7%, in 2023 compared to 2022. This decrease is primarily driven by a one time tax benefit of $22.4 million resulting from the release of a valuation allowance on a capital loss tax asset due to a tax planning action identified in the fourth quarter of 2023, due to a future restructuring of certain foreign subsidiaries that would not have a material impact on AB operations. This resulted in a lower effective tax rate in 2023 of 3.6% compared to 4.9% in 2022.
Income tax expense decreased $23.1 million, or 36.8%, in 2022 compared to 2021. This decrease is due to lower pre-tax book income and one-time discrete items which resulted in a lower effective tax rate in 2022 of 4.9% compared to 5.2% in 2021.
Net Income (Loss) of Consolidated Entities Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests
Net income (loss) of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests primarily consists of limited partner interests owned by other investors in our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds. In 2023, we had $24.0 million of net income of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests, primarily due to gains on investments held by our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds. In 2022, we had $56.4 million of net loss of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests, primarily due to losses on investments held by our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds. In 2021 we had $5.1 million of net income of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests, primarily due to gains on investments held by our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Cash flows from operating activities primarily include the receipt of investment advisory and services fees and other revenues offset by the payment of operating expenses incurred in the normal course of business. Our cash flows from operating activities have historically been positive and sufficient to support our operations. We do not anticipate this to change in the foreseeable future. Cash flows from investing activities generally consist of small capital expenditures and, when applicable, business acquisitions. Cash flows from financing activities primarily consist of issuance and repayment of debt and the repurchase of AB Holding units to fund our long-term deferred compensation plans. We are required to distribute all of our Available Cash Flow to our Unitholders and the General Partner.
During 2023, net cash provided by operating activities was $0.9 billion, compared to $1.1 billion during 2022. The change primarily was due to an increase in fees receivable of $161.1 million, lower earnings of $159.9 million (after non-cash reconciling items), a decrease in broker-dealer related payables (net of receivable and segregated U.S. Treasury Bills activity) of $133.3 million and an increase in deferred sales commissions of $59.8 million, partially offset by net activity of our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds of $166.0 million and an increase in accrued compensation of $127.4 million.During 2022, net cash provided by operating activities was $1.1 billion, compared to $1.3 billion during 2021. The change primarily was due to lower earnings of $265.1 million (after non-cash reconciling items), a decrease in accrued compensation of $200.8 million and a decrease in broker-dealer related payables (net of receivable and segregated U.S. Treasury Bills activity) of $169.2 million, partially offset by net activity of our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds of $252.0 million and an increase in fees receivable of $193.3 million.
During 2023, net cash used in investing activities was $33.6 million, compared to $22.0 million during 2022. The change is due to the acquisition of CarVal, net cash acquired of $40.3 million in 2022, partially offset by lower purchases of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements of $28.7 million. During 2022, net cash used in investing activities was $22.0 million, compared to $65.7 million during 2021. The change is primarily due to the acquisition of CarVal, net cash acquired of $40.3 million in 2022.
During 2023, net cash used in financing activities was $1.0 billion, compared to $1.1 billion during 2022. The change reflects lower cash distributions to Unitholders of $230.6 million, a decrease in the net purchases of AB Holding Units to fund long-term incentive compensation plans of $66.5 million and the repayment of CarVal debt of $42.7 million, partially offset by higher net purchases of non-controlling interests of consolidated company-sponsored investment funds of $187.1 million and lower net borrowings of debt of $70.7 million. During 2022, net cash used in financing activities was $1.1 billion, compared to $0.9 billion during 2021. The change reflects lower net purchases of non-controlling interests of consolidated company-sponsored investment funds in 2022 of $309.9 million, repayment of CarVal debt of $42.7 million and a decrease in overdrafts payable of $41.6 million, partially offset by higher net borrowings of debt of $155.0 million and a decrease in the net purchases of AB Holding Units to fund long-term incentive compensation plans of $51.3 million.
As of December 31, 2023, AB had $1.0 billion of cash and cash equivalents (excluding cash and cash equivalents of consolidated company-sponsored investment funds and cash held-for-sale), all of which is available for liquidity but consist primarily of cash on deposit for our broker-dealers related to various customer clearing activities and cash held by foreign subsidiaries of $585.8 million.
54 AllianceBernstein
Table of Contents
Part II
See Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for disclosures relating to our debt and credit facilities. We use our debt and credit facilities to seed certain new investment products which may expose us to market risk, credit risk and material gains and losses. To reduce our exposure, we enter into various futures, forwards, options and swaps primarily to economically hedge certain of our seed money investments. While in most cases broad market risks are hedged and are effective in reducing our exposure, our hedgers are imperfect and we may remain exposed to some market risk and credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties on these derivative instruments.
Our financial condition and access to public and private debt markets should provide adequate liquidity for our general business needs. Management believes that cash flow from operations and the issuance of debt and AB Units or AB Holding Units will provide us with the resources we need to meet our financial obligations. See “Risk Factors” in Item 1A and “Cautions Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in this Item 7 for a discussion of credit markets and our ability to renew our credit facilities at expiration.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations
Guarantees
Under various circumstances, AB guarantees the obligations of its consolidated subsidiaries.
AB maintains a guarantee in connection with an $800 million committed, unsecured senior revolving credit facility (the "Credit Facility"). If SCB LLC is unable to meet its obligations, AB will pay the obligations when due or on demand. SCB LLC currently has five uncommitted lines of credit with five financial institutions. Four of these lines of credit permit us to borrow up to an aggregate of approximately $315.0 million, with AB named as an additional borrower, while the other line has no stated limit. AB has guaranteed the obligations of SCB LLC under these lines of credit. AB maintains guarantees totaling $415.0 million for SCB LLC’s five uncommitted lines of credit.
AB maintains a guarantee with a commercial bank, under which we guarantee the obligations in the ordinary course of business of each of SCB LLC, our U.K.-based broker-dealer and our Cayman subsidiary. We also maintain three additional guarantees with other commercial banks under which we guarantee approximately $270.9 million of obligations for our U.K.-based broker-dealer and $99.0 million of obligations for our India-based broker-dealer. In the event that any of these three entities is unable to meet its obligations, AB will pay the obligations when due or on demand.
We also have two smaller guarantees with a commercial bank totaling approximately $1.9 million, under which we guarantee certain obligations in the ordinary course of business of one of our foreign subsidiaries.
We have not been required to perform under any of the above agreements and currently have no liability in connection with these agreements.
Aggregate Contractual Obligations
We have various compensation and benefit obligations, including accrued salaries and fringes, commissions, payroll taxes, incentive payments and deferred compensation arrangements. The majority of our compensation and benefits obligations are paid out in less than one year, while the deferred compensation obligations are payable over various periods, with the majority payable over periods of up to three years. Accrued compensation and benefits as of December 31, 2023 totaled $354.5 million. This amount excludes our accrued pension obligation. Offsetting our accrued compensation obligations are long-term incentive compensation-related investments and money market investments we funded totaling $41.1 million, which are included in our consolidated statement of financial condition. Any amounts reflected on the consolidated statement of financial condition as payables (to broker-dealers, brokerage clients and company-sponsored mutual funds) and accounts payable and accrued expenses are excluded from the aforementioned accrued compensation and benefits obligation amount.
We expect to make contributions to our qualified profit sharing plan of approximately $19.0 million in each of the next four years. We do not currently anticipate that we will contribute to the Retirement Plan during 2024.
The 2017 Tax Act (enacted in the U.S. on December 22, 2017) imposed a federal transition tax on mandatory deemed repatriation of certain deferred foreign earnings. Management elected to pay the transition tax in installments over an eight-year period from 2018 to 2025. The federal transition tax obligation as of December 31, 2023 totaled $8.7 million and is recorded to income tax payable on our consolidated statement of financial condition. See Note 21 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for further discussion of our taxes.
See Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for discussion of our leases.
See Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for a discussion of our debt.
Table of Contents
Part II
Contingencies
See Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for a discussion of our commitments and contingencies.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.