Item 1A.Risk Factors
Please consider this section along with the description of our business in Item 1, the competition section immediately above and AB’s financial information contained in Items 6, 7 and 8. The majority of the risk factors discussed below directly affect AB. These risk factors also affect AB Holding because AB Holding’s principal source of income and cash flow is attributable to its investment in AB. See also “Cautions Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in Item 7.
Business-related Risks, including risks relating to COVID-19
Our revenues and results of operations depend on the market value and composition of our AUM, which can fluctuate significantly based on various factors, including many factors outside of our control.
We derive most of our revenues from investment advisory and services fees, which typically are calculated as a percentage of the value of AUM as of a specified date, or as a percentage of the value of average AUM for the applicable billing period, and vary with the type of investment service, the size of the account and the total amount of assets we manage for a particular client. The value and composition of our AUM can be adversely affected by several factors, including:
•Market Factors. The dramatic securities market declines experienced during March 2020, which resulted from the global effects of COVID-19, caused a significant reduction in our AUM. Markets and AUM levels have since recovered to new highs following unprecedented, coordinated monetary and fiscal policy support and, more recently, the approval of vaccines to help remedy the global pandemic. However, we recognize that, due to continued uncertainty associated with these circumstances, markets may remain volatile and, accordingly, there remains risk of a significant reduction in our revenues and net income in future periods, particularly if the negative effects on the global economy from COVID accelerate.
Global economies and financial markets are increasingly interconnected, which increases the probability that conditions in one country or region might adversely impact a different country or region. Conditions affecting the general economy, including political, social or economic instability at the local, regional or global level, such as the civil unrest centered around racial inequity experienced across the U.S. during the second, third and fourth quarters of 2020, and the riot experienced in Washington D.C. in January 2021 surrounding the transition to a new Presidential administration, may also affect the market value of our AUM. Health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as other incidents that interrupt the expected course of events, such as natural disasters, war or civil disturbance, acts of terrorism (whether foreign or domestic), power outages and other unforeseeable and external events, and the public response to or fear of such diseases or events, have had and may in the future have a significant adverse effect on financial markets and our AUM, revenues and net income. Furthermore, the preventative and protective health-related actions, such as business activity suspensions and population lock-downs, that governments have taken, and may continue to take, in response to COVID-19 have resulted, and may continue to result, in periods of business interruption, inability to obtain raw materials, supplies and component parts, and reduced or disrupted operations. These circumstances have caused, and may continue to cause, significant economic disruption and high levels of unemployment, which will adversely affect the financial condition and results of operations of many of the companies in which we invest, and likely reduce the market value of their securities and thus our AUM and revenues. Furthermore, the significant market volatility and uncertainty, and reductions in the availability of margin financing, we experienced during the first quarter of 2020 severely limited the liquidity of certain asset backed and other securities, making it at times impossible to sell these securities at prices reflecting their true economic value. While liquidity conditions have improved considerably since the first quarter following the stimulus programs announced by the U.S. Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury, we recognize the possibility that conditions could deteriorate in the future. Lack of liquidity makes it more difficult for our funds to meet redemption requests. If liquidity were to worsen, this may have a significant adverse effect on our AUM, revenues and net income in the future.
•Client Preferences. Generally, our clients may withdraw their assets at any time and on short notice. Also, changing market dynamics and investment trends, particularly with respect to sponsors of defined benefit plans choosing to invest in less risky investments and the ongoing shift to lower-fee passive services described below, may continue to reduce interest in some of the investment products we offer, and/or clients and prospects may continue to seek investment products that we may not currently offer. Loss of, or decreases in, AUM reduces our investment advisory and services fees and revenues.
•Our Investment Performance. Our ability to achieve investment returns for clients that meet or exceed investment returns for comparable asset classes and competing investment services is a key consideration when clients decide to keep their assets with us or invest additional assets, and when a prospective client is deciding whether to invest with
17
Table of Contents
us. Poor investment performance, both in absolute terms and/or relative to peers and stated benchmarks, may result in clients withdrawing assets and prospective clients choosing to invest with competitors.
•Investing Trends. Our fee rates can vary significantly among the various investment products and services we offer to our clients (see “Net Revenues” in Item 7 for additional information regarding our fee rates); our fee realization rate fluctuates as clients shift assets between accounts or products with different fee structures.
•Service Changes. We may be required to reduce our fee levels, restructure the fees we charge and/or adjust the services we offer to our clients because of, among other things, regulatory initiatives (whether industry-wide or specifically targeted), changing technology in the asset management business (including algorithmic strategies and emerging financial technology), court decisions and competitive considerations. A reduction in fee levels would reduce our revenues.
A decrease in the value of our AUM, a decrease in the amount of AUM we manage, an adverse mix shift in our AUM and/or a reduction in the level of fees we charge would adversely affect our investment advisory fees and revenues. A reduction in revenues, without a commensurate reduction in expenses, adversely affects our results of operations.
The industry-wide shift from actively-managed investment services to passive services has adversely affected our investment advisory and services fees, revenues and results of operations, and this trend may continue.
Our competitive environment has become increasingly difficult over the past decade, as active managers, which invest based on individual security selection, have, on average, consistently underperformed passive services, which invest based on market indices. Active performance relative to benchmarks in the first half of 2020 remained mixed, with 51% of active managers outperforming their passive benchmarks for the six months ended June 30, 2020 (latest data available). Non-U.S. stock active funds fared better with 60% outperforming benchmarks, while 48% of U.S. stock active funds outperformed and just 40% of active bond funds outperformed their benchmarks. Also, results varied among growth, value and core managers.
Demand for passive strategies persisted, and while active equity managers continued to struggle to attract new assets, flows to active fixed income managers remained positive. In the U.S., total industry-wide active mutual fund outflows of $196 billion in 2020 increased from net outflows of $12 billion in 2019. Active equity U.S. mutual fund outflows of $338 billion in 2020 increased by 23% year-over-year. Active fixed income U.S. mutual funds showed continued strength with inflows of $246 billion in 2020, though they decreased 9% from $271 billion in 2019. Fixed income active flows were positive in each quarter in 2020 following the sell-off in March 2020. Total industry-wide passive mutual fund inflows of $361 billion declined by 20% from last year's inflows of $450 billion. In this environment, organic growth through positive net inflows is difficult to achieve for active managers, such as AB, and requires taking market share from other active managers.
The significant shift from active services to passive services adversely affects Bernstein Research Services revenues as well. While global market trading volumes increased in 2020 due to higher market volatility, predominantly relating to COVID, the broader trend in recent years has been declines, which we would expect to continue, fueled by persistent active equity outflows and passive equity inflows. As a result, portfolio turnover has declined and investors hold fewer shares that are actively traded by managers.
Our reputation could suffer if we are unable to deliver consistent, competitive investment performance.
Our business is based on the trust and confidence of our clients. Damage to our reputation, resulting from poor or inconsistent investment performance, among other factors, can reduce substantially our AUM and impair our ability to maintain or grow our business.
EQH and its subsidiaries, and to a lesser extent AXA and its subsidiaries, provide a significant amount of our AUM and fund a significant portion of our seed investments, and if our agreements with them terminate or they withdraw capital support, whether as a result of EQH's public offerings since 2018 or another factor, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and/or financial condition.
EQH (our parent company) and its subsidiaries is our largest client. Our EQH affiliates represented approximately 19%, of our AUM as of December 31, 2020, and we earned approximately 3% of our net revenues from services we provided to them in 2020. Also, AXA and its subsidiaries represented approximately 3% of our AUM as of December 31, 2020, and we earned approximately 2% of our net revenues from services we provided to them in 2020. Our related investment management agreements are terminable at any time or on short notice by either party, and neither EQH nor AXA is under any obligation to maintain any level of AUM with us. A material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and/or financial condition could result if EQH were to terminate its investment management agreements with us.
18
Table of Contents
During the second quarter of 2018, AXA completed the sale of a minority stake in EQH through an initial public offering ("IPO"). Since then, AXA has completed additional offerings and taken other steps, most recently during the fourth quarter of 2019. As a result, AXA owned less than 10% of the outstanding common stock of EQH as of December 31, 2020.
While we cannot at this time predict the full impact on AB of this transaction, such impact has included a reduction in the support AXA provided to AB in the past with respect to AB's investment management business, resulting in a modest decrease in our revenues and ability to initiate new investment services. Also, AB relies on AXA, including its subsidiary, AXA Business Services, for several significant services, and AB has benefited from its affiliation with AXA in certain common vendor relationships. Some of these arrangements have changed, and others are expected to change, with immaterial financial implications for AB.
Our business is dependent on investment advisory agreements with clients, and selling and distribution agreements with various financial intermediaries and consultants, which generally are subject to termination or non-renewal on short notice.
We derive most of our revenues pursuant to written investment management agreements (or other arrangements) with institutional investors, mutual funds and private wealth clients, and selling and distribution agreements with financial intermediaries that distribute AB Funds. Generally, the investment management agreements (and other arrangements), including our agreements with EQH and its subsidiaries, are terminable at any time or upon relatively short notice by either party. The investment management agreements pursuant to which we manage the U.S. Funds must be renewed and approved by the Funds’ boards of directors annually. A significant majority of the directors are independent. Consequently, there can be no assurance that the board of directors of each fund will approve the fund’s investment management agreement each year, or will not condition its approval on revised terms that may be adverse to us. In addition, investors in AB Funds can redeem their investments without notice. Any termination of, or failure to renew, a significant number of these agreements, or a significant increase in redemption rates, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and business prospects.
Similarly, the selling and distribution agreements with securities firms, brokers, banks and other financial intermediaries are terminable by either party upon notice (generally 30 days) and do not obligate the financial intermediary to sell any specific amount of fund shares. These intermediaries generally offer their clients investment products that compete with our products. In addition, certain institutional investors rely on consultants to advise them about choosing an investment adviser and some of our services may not be considered among the best choices by these consultants. As a result, investment consultants may advise their clients to move their assets invested with us to other investment advisers, which could result in significant net outflows.
Lastly, our Private Wealth Services rely on referrals from financial planners, registered investment advisers and other professionals. We cannot be certain that we will continue to have access to, or receive referrals from, these third parties. Loss of such access or referrals could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and business prospects.
Performance-based fee arrangements with our clients may cause greater fluctuations in our net revenues.
We sometimes charge our clients performance-based fees, whereby we charge a base advisory fee and are eligible to earn an additional performance-based fee or incentive allocation that is calculated as either a percentage of absolute investment results or a percentage of investment results in excess of a stated benchmark over a specified period of time. Some performance-based fees include a high-watermark provision, which generally provides that if a client account under-performs relative to its performance target (whether in absolute terms or relative to a specified benchmark), it must gain back such under-performance before we can collect future performance-based fees. Therefore, if we fail to achieve the performance target for a particular period, we will not earn a performance-based fee for that period and, for accounts with a high-watermark provision, our ability to earn future performance-based fees will be impaired.
We are eligible to earn performance-based fees on 6.0%, 8.5% and 0.8% of the assets we manage for institutional clients, private wealth clients and retail clients, respectively (in total, 4.4% of our AUM). If the percentage of our AUM subject to performance-based fees increases, seasonality and volatility of revenue and earnings are likely to become more significant. Our performance-based fees were $132.6 million, $99.6 million and $118.1 million in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
The revenues generated by Bernstein Research Services may be adversely affected by circumstances beyond our control, including declines in brokerage transaction rates, declines in global market volumes, failure to settle our trades by significant counterparties and the effects of MiFID II.
Electronic, or “low-touch,” trading represents a significant percentage of buy-side trading activity and typically produces transaction fees that are significantly lower than the price of traditional full service fee rates. As a result, blended pricing throughout our industry is lower now than it was historically, and price declines may continue. In addition, fee rates we charge
19
Table of Contents
and charged by other brokers for brokerage services have historically experienced price pressure, and we expect these trends to continue. Also, while increases in transaction volume and market share often can offset decreases in rates, this may not continue.
In addition, the failure or inability of any of our broker-dealer's significant counterparties to perform could expose us to substantial expenditures and adversely affect our revenues. For example, SCB LLC, as a member of clearing and settlement organizations, would be required to settle open trades of any non-performing counterparty. This exposes us to the mark-to-market adjustment on the trades between trade date and settlement date, which could be significant, especially during periods of severe market volatility. Also, our ability to access liquidity in such situations may be limited by what our funding relationships are able to offer us at such times.
We discuss the risks associated with the second installment of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (“MiFID II”) below in "Legal and Regulatory-related Risks" in this Item 1A.
Fluctuations in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and various other currencies can adversely affect our AUM, revenues and results of operations.
Although significant portions of our net revenues and expenses, as well as our AUM, presently are denominated in U.S. dollars, we have subsidiaries and clients outside of the United States with functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Weakening of these currencies relative to the U.S. dollar adversely affects the value in U.S. dollar terms of our revenues and our AUM denominated in these other currencies. Accordingly, fluctuations in U.S. dollar exchange rates affect our AUM, revenues and reported financial results from one period to the next.
We may not be successful in our efforts to hedge our exposure to such fluctuations, which could negatively impact our revenues and reported financial results.
Our seed capital investments are subject to market risk. While we enter into various futures, forwards, swap and option contracts to economically hedge many of these investments, we also may be exposed to market risk and credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to these derivative instruments.
We have a seed investment program for the purpose of building track records and assisting with the marketing initiatives pertaining to our firm's new products. These seed capital investments are subject to market risk. Our risk management team oversees a seed hedging program that attempts to minimize this risk, subject to practical and cost considerations. Also, not all seed investments are deemed appropriate to hedge, and in those cases we are exposed to market risk. In addition, we may be subject to basis risk in that we cannot always hedge with precision our market exposure and, as a result, we may be subject to relative spreads between market sectors. As a result, volatility in the capital markets may cause significant changes in our period-to-period financial and operating results.
We use various derivative instruments, including futures, forwards, swap and option contracts, in conjunction with our seed hedging program. While in most cases broad market risks are hedged, our hedges are imperfect and some market risk remains. In addition, our use of derivatives results in counterparty risk (i.e., the risk that we may be exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to these derivative instruments), regulatory risk (e.g., short selling restrictions) and cash/synthetic basis risk (i.e., the risk that the underlying positions do not move identically to the related derivative instruments).
We may engage in strategic transactions that could pose risks.
As part of our business strategy, we consider potential strategic transactions, including acquisitions, dispositions, mergers, consolidations, joint venture partnerships and similar transactions, some of which may be material. These transactions, if undertaken, may involve various risks and present financial, managerial and operational challenges, including:.
•adverse effects on our earnings if acquired intangible assets or goodwill become impaired;
•existence of unknown liabilities or contingencies that arise after closing;
•potential disputes with counterparties; and
•the possible need for us to increase our firm's leverage or, if we fund the purchase price of a transaction with AB Units or AB Holding Units, likely dilution to our existing unitholders.
20
Table of Contents
Acquisitions also pose the risk that any business we acquire may lose customers or employees or could under-perform relative to expectations. Additionally, the loss of investment personnel poses the risk that we may lose the AUM we expected to manage, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
We may not accurately value the securities we hold on behalf of our clients or our company investments.
In accordance with applicable regulatory requirements, contractual obligations or client direction, we employ procedures for the pricing and valuation of securities and other positions held in client accounts or for company investments. We have established a Valuation Committee, consisting of senior officers and employees, which oversees pricing controls and valuation processes. If market quotations for a security are not readily available, the Valuation Committee determines a fair value for the security.
Extraordinary volatility in financial markets, significant liquidity constraints or our failure to adequately consider one or more factors when determining the fair value of a security based on information with limited market observability could result in our failing to properly value securities we hold for our clients or investments accounted for on our balance sheet. Improper valuation likely would result in our basing fee calculations on inaccurate AUM figures, our striking incorrect net asset values for company-sponsored mutual funds or hedge funds or, in the case of company investments, our inaccurately calculating and reporting our financial condition and operating results. Although the overall percentage of our AUM that we fair value based on information with limited market observability is not significant, inaccurate fair value determinations can harm our clients, create regulatory issues and damage our reputation.
We may not have sufficient information to confirm or review the accuracy of valuations provided to us by underlying external managers for the funds in which certain of our alternative investment products invest.
Certain of our alternative investment services invest in funds managed by external managers (“External Managers”) rather than investing directly in securities and other instruments. As a result, our abilities will be limited with regard to (i) monitoring such investments, (ii) regularly obtaining complete, accurate and current information with respect to such investments and (iii) exercising control over such investments. Accordingly, we may not have sufficient information to confirm or review the accuracy of valuations provided to us by External Managers. In addition, we will be required to rely on External Managers’ compliance with any applicable investment guidelines and restrictions. Any failure of an External Manager to operate within such guidelines or to provide accurate information with respect to the investment could subject our alternative investment products to losses and cause damage to our reputation.
The quantitative models we use in certain of our investment services may contain errors, resulting in imprecise risk assessments and unintended output.
We use quantitative models in a variety of our investment services, generally in combination with fundamental research. These models are developed by senior quantitative professionals and typically are implemented by IT professionals. Our Model Risk Oversight Committee oversees the model governance framework and associated model review activities, which are then executed by our Model Risk Team. However, due to the complexity and large data dependency of such models, it is possible that errors in the models could exist and our controls could fail to detect such errors. Failure to detect errors could result in client losses and reputational damage.
The financial services industry is intensely competitive.
We compete on the basis of a number of factors, including our investment performance for our clients, our array of investment services, innovation, reputation and price. By having a global presence, we often face competitors with more experience and more established relationships with clients, regulators and industry participants in the relevant market, which could adversely affect our ability to expand. Furthermore, if we are unable to maintain and/or continue to improve our investment performance, our client flows may be adversely affected, which may make it more difficult for us to compete effectively.
Also, increased competition could reduce the demand for our products and services, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and business prospects. For additional information regarding competitive factors, see “Competition” in Item 1.
21
Table of Contents
Human Capital-related Risks
We may be unable to continue to attract, motivate and retain key personnel, and the cost to retain key personnel could put pressure on our adjusted operating margin.
Our business depends on our ability to attract, motivate and retain highly skilled, and often highly specialized, technical, investment, managerial and executive personnel, and there is no assurance that we will be able to do so.
The market for these professionals is extremely competitive. They often maintain strong, personal relationships with investors in our products and other members of the business community so their departure may cause us to lose client accounts or result in fewer opportunities to win new business, either of which factors could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and business prospects.
Additionally, a decline in revenues may limit our ability to pay our employees at competitive levels, and maintaining (or increasing) compensation without a revenue increase, in order to retain key personnel, may adversely affect our adjusted operating margin. As a result, we remain vigilant about aligning our cost structure (including headcount) with our revenue base. For additional information regarding our compensation practices, see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" in Item 11.
Our process of relocating our headquarters may not be executed as we envision.
We have announced that we will establish our corporate headquarters in and relocate approximately 1,250 jobs located in the New York metropolitan area to Nashville, Tennessee (for additional information, see “Relocation Strategy” in Item 7). Although the eventual impact on AB from this process is not yet known, the uncertainty created by these circumstances could have a significant adverse effect on AB’s ability to motivate and retain current employees. Further significant managerial and operational challenges could arise, such as ineffective transfer of institutional knowledge from current employees to newly-hired employees, if AB experiences significantly greater attrition among current employees than the firm anticipates in connection with the relocation and/or if the firm encounters more difficulty than expected in hiring qualified employees to help staff our Nashville headquarters.
Additionally, our estimates for both the transition costs and the corresponding expense savings relating to our headquarters relocation, which we discuss in more detail in “Relocation Strategy” in Item 7, are based on our current assumptions of employee relocation costs, severance, and overlapping compensation and occupancy costs. If our assumptions turn out to be inaccurate, our adjusted net revenues and adjusted operating income could be adversely affected.
Operational, Technology and Cyber-related Risks
Technology failures and disruptions, including failures to properly safeguard confidential information, can significantly constrain our operations and result in significant time and expense to remediate, which could result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations and business prospects.
We are highly dependent on software and related technologies throughout our business, including both proprietary systems and those provided by third-party vendors. We use our technology to, among other things, obtain securities pricing information, process client transactions, store and maintain data, and provide reports and other services to our clients. Despite our protective measures, including measures designed to effectively secure information through system security technology and established and tested business continuity plans, we may still experience system delays and interruptions as a result of natural disasters, hardware failures, software defects, power outages, acts of war and third-party failures. We cannot predict with certainty all of the adverse effects that could result from our failure, or the failure of a third party, to efficiently address and resolve these delays and interruptions. These adverse effects could include the inability to perform critical business functions or failure to comply with financial reporting and other regulatory requirements, which could lead to loss of client confidence, reputational damage, exposure to disciplinary action and liability to our clients.
Many of the software applications that we use in our business are licensed from, and supported, upgraded and maintained by, third-party vendors. A suspension or termination of certain of these licenses or the related support, upgrades and maintenance could cause temporary system delays or interruption. Additionally, technology rapidly evolves and we cannot guarantee that our competitors may not implement more advanced technology platforms for their products and services, which may place us at a competitive disadvantage and adversely affect our results of operations and business prospects.
Also, we could be subject to losses if we fail to properly safeguard sensitive and confidential information. As part of our normal operations, we maintain and transmit confidential information about our clients as well as proprietary information relating to
22
Table of Contents
our business operations. Although we take protective measures, our systems still could be vulnerable to cyber attack or other forms of unauthorized access (including computer viruses) that have a security impact, such as an authorized employee or vendor inadvertently or intentionally causing us to release confidential or proprietary information. Such disclosure could, among other things, allow competitors access to our proprietary business information and require significant time and expense to investigate and remediate the breach. Moreover, loss of confidential client information could harm our reputation and subject us to liability under laws that protect confidential personal data, resulting in increased costs or loss of revenues.
Any significant security breach of our information and cyber security infrastructure, as well as our failure to properly escalate and respond to such an incident, may significantly harm our operations and reputation.
It is critical that we ensure the continuity and effectiveness of our information and cyber security infrastructure, policies, procedures and capabilities to protect our computer and telecommunications systems and the data that reside on or are transmitted through them and contracted third-party systems. Although we take protective measures, including measures to effectively secure information through system security technology, our technology systems may still be vulnerable to unauthorized access, supply chain attacks, computer viruses or other events that have a security impact, such as an external attack by one or more cyber criminals (including phishing attacks attempting to obtain confidential information and ransomware attacks attempting to block access to a computer system until a sum of money is paid), which could materially harm our operations and reputation. Additionally, while we take precautions to password protect and encrypt our laptops and sensitive information on our other mobile electronic devices, if such devices are stolen, misplaced or left unattended, they may become vulnerable to hacking or other unauthorized use, creating a possible security risk and resulting in potentially costly actions by us.
Furthermore, although we maintain a robust cyber security infrastructure and incident preparedness strategy, which we test periodically, we may be unable to respond, both internally and externally, to a cyber incident in a sufficiently expeditious manner. Any such failure could cause significant harm to our reputation and result in litigation, regulatory scrutiny and/or significant remediation costs.
Unpredictable events, including climate change, outbreak of infectious disease, natural disaster, dangerous weather conditions, technology failure, terrorist attack and political unrest, may adversely affect our ability to conduct business.
War, terrorist attack, political unrest, power failure, climate change, natural disaster and rapid spread of infectious disease (such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic) could interrupt our operations by:
•causing disruptions in global economic conditions, thereby decreasing investor confidence and making investment products generally less attractive;
•inflicting loss of life;
•triggering large-scale technology failures or delays;
•breaching our information and cyber security infrastructure; and
•requiring substantial capital expenditures and operating expenses to remediate damage and restore operations.
Despite the contingency plans and facilities we have in place, including system security measures, information back-up and disaster recovery processes, our ability to conduct business, including in key business centers where we have significant operations, such as New York City, London, England, and Nashville, Tennessee, may be adversely affected by a disruption in the infrastructure that supports our operations and the communities in which they are located. This may include a disruption involving electrical, communications, transportation or other services we may use or third parties with which we conduct business. If a disruption occurs in one location and our employees in that location are unable to occupy our offices or communicate with or travel to other locations, our ability to conduct business with and on behalf of our clients may suffer, and we may not be able to successfully implement contingency plans that depend on communication or travel. Furthermore, unauthorized access to our systems as a result of a security breach, the failure of our systems, or the loss of data could give rise to legal proceedings or regulatory penalties under laws protecting the privacy of personal information, disrupt operations, and damage our reputation.
Our operations require experienced, professional staff. Loss of a substantial number of such persons or an inability to provide properly equipped places for them to work may, by disrupting our operations, adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and business prospects. In addition, our property and business interruption insurance may not be adequate to compensate us for all losses, failures or breaches that may occur.
23
Table of Contents
Our own operational failures or those of third parties on which we rely, including failures arising out of human error, could disrupt our business, damage our reputation and reduce our revenues.
Weaknesses or failures in our internal processes or systems could lead to disruption of our operations, liability to clients, exposure to disciplinary action or harm to our reputation. Our business is highly dependent on our ability to process, on a daily basis, large numbers of transactions, many of which are highly complex, across numerous and diverse markets. These transactions generally must comply with client investment guidelines, as well as stringent legal and regulatory standards.
Our obligations to clients require us to exercise skill, care and prudence in performing our services. Despite our employees being highly trained and skilled, the large number of transactions we process makes it highly likely that errors will occasionally occur. If we make a mistake in performing our services that causes financial harm to a client, we have a duty to act promptly to put the client in the position the client would have been in had we not made the error. The occurrence of mistakes, particularly significant ones, can have a material adverse effect on our reputation, results of operations and business prospects.
The individuals, third-party vendors or issuers on whom we rely to perform services for us or our clients may be unable or unwilling to honor their contractual obligations to us.
We rely on various counterparties and other third-party vendors to augment our existing investment, operational, financial and technological capabilities, but the use of a third-party vendor does not diminish AB's responsibility to ensure that client and regulatory obligations are met. Default rates, credit downgrades and disputes with counterparties as to the valuation of collateral increase significantly in times of market stress. Disruptions in the financial markets and other economic challenges may cause our counterparties and other third-party vendors to experience significant cash flow problems or even render them insolvent, which may expose us to significant costs and impair our ability to conduct business.
Weaknesses or failures within a third-party vendor's internal processes or systems, or inadequate business continuity plans, can materially disrupt our business operations. Also, third-party vendors may lack the necessary infrastructure or resources to effectively safeguard our confidential data. If we are unable to effectively manage the risks associated with such third-party relationships, we may suffer fines, disciplinary action and reputational damage.
We may not always successfully manage actual and potential conflicts of interest that arise in our business.
Increasingly, we must manage actual and potential conflicts of interest, including situations where our services to a particular client conflict, or are perceived to conflict, with the interests of another client. Failure to adequately address potential conflicts of interest could adversely affect our reputation, results of operations and business prospects.
We have procedures and controls that are designed to identify and mitigate conflicts of interest, including those designed to prevent the improper sharing of information. However, appropriately managing conflicts of interest is complex. Our reputation could be damaged and the willingness of clients to enter into transactions in which such a conflict might arise may be affected if we fail, or appear to fail, to deal appropriately with actual or perceived conflicts of interest. In addition, potential or perceived conflicts could give rise to litigation or regulatory enforcement actions.
Maintaining adequate liquidity for our general business needs depends on certain factors, including operating cash flows and our access to credit on reasonable terms.
Our financial condition is dependent on our cash flow from operations, which is subject to the performance of the capital markets, our ability to maintain and grow AUM and other factors beyond our control. Our ability to issue public or private debt on reasonable terms may be limited by adverse market conditions, our profitability, our creditworthiness as perceived by lenders and changes in government regulations, including tax rates and interest rates. Furthermore, our access to credit on reasonable terms is partially dependent on our firm’s credit ratings.
Both Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor's Rating Service affirmed AB’s long-term and short-term credit ratings and indicated a stable outlook in 2020. Future changes in our credit ratings are possible and any downgrade to our ratings is likely to increase our borrowing costs and limit our access to the capital markets. If this occurs, we may be forced to incur unanticipated costs or revise our strategic plans, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.
24
Table of Contents
An impairment of goodwill may occur.
Determining whether an impairment of the goodwill asset exists requires management to exercise a substantial amount of judgment. In addition, to the extent that securities valuations are depressed for prolonged periods of time and/or market conditions deteriorate, or if we experience significant net redemptions, our AUM, revenues, profitability and unit price will be adversely affected. Although the price of an AB Holding Unit is just one factor in the calculation of fair value, if AB Holding Unit price levels decline significantly, reaching the conclusion that fair value exceeds carrying value will, over time, become more difficult. In addition, control premiums, industry earnings multiples and discount rates are impacted by economic conditions. As a result, subsequent impairment tests may occur more frequently and be based on more negative assumptions and future cash flow projections, and may result in an impairment of goodwill. An impairment may result in a material charge to our earnings. For additional information about our impairment testing, see Item 7.
The insurance that we maintain may not fully cover all potential exposures.
We maintain professional liability, fidelity, cyber, property, casualty, business interruption and other types of insurance, but such insurance may not cover all risks associated with the operation of our business. Our coverage is subject to exclusions and limitations, including high self-insured retentions or deductibles and maximum limits and liabilities covered. In addition, from time to time, various types of insurance may not be available on commercially acceptable terms or, in some cases, at all. We can make no assurance that a claim or claims will be covered by our insurance policies or, if covered, will not exceed our available insurance coverage, or that our insurers will remain solvent and meet their obligations.
In the future, we may not be able to obtain coverage at current levels, if at all, and our premiums may increase significantly on coverage that we maintain. Also, we currently are party to certain joint insurance arrangements with subsidiaries of EQH. If our affiliates choose not to include us as insured parties under any such policies, we may need to obtain stand-alone insurance coverage, which could have coverage terms that are less beneficial to us and/or cost more.
Legal and Regulatory-related Risks
Our business is subject to pervasive, complex and continuously evolving global regulation, compliance with which involves substantial expenditures of time and money, and violation of which may result in material adverse consequences.
Virtually all aspects of our business are subject to federal and state laws and regulations, rules of securities regulators and exchanges, and laws and regulations in the foreign jurisdictions in which our subsidiaries conduct business. If we violate these laws or regulations, we could be subject to civil liability, criminal liability or sanction, including restriction or revocation of our and our subsidiaries’ professional licenses or registrations, revocation of the licenses of our employees, censures, fines, or temporary suspension or permanent bar from conducting business. Any such liability or sanction could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and business prospects. A regulatory proceeding, even if it does not result in a finding of wrongdoing or sanction, could require substantial expenditures of time and money and could potentially damage our reputation.
In recent years, global regulators have substantially increased their oversight of financial services. Some of the newly-adopted and proposed regulations are focused on investment management services. Others, while more broadly focused, nonetheless impact our business. Moreover, the adoption of new laws, regulations or standards and changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws, regulations or standards have directly affected, and will continue to affect, our business, including making our efforts to comply more expensive and time-consuming.
For example, in 2015 the Financial Supervisory Commission in Taiwan (the “FSC”) implemented new limits on the degree to which local investors can own an offshore investment product. While certain exemptions have been available to us, should we not continue to qualify, the FSC’s rules could force some of our local resident investors to redeem their investments in our funds sold in Taiwan (and/or prevent further sales of those funds in Taiwan), some of which funds have local ownership levels substantially above the FSC limits. This could lead to significant declines in our investment advisory and services fees and revenues earned from these funds.
In Europe, MiFID II, which became effective in January 2018, makes significant modifications to the manner in which European broker-dealers can be compensated for research. These modifications have reduced, and are believed to have significantly reduced, the overall research spend by European buy-side firms, which has decreased the revenues we derive from our European clients. Our European clients may continue to reduce their research budgets, which could result in a significant decline in our sell-side revenues.
25
Table of Contents
Also, while MiFID II is not applicable to firms operating outside of Europe, competitive and client pressures increasingly may force buy-side firms operating outside of Europe to pay for research from their own resources instead of through bundled trading commissions. To the extent that occurs, we expect that research budgets from those clients will decrease further, which could result in an additional significant decline in our sell-side revenues. Additionally, these competitive and client pressures may result in our buy-side operation paying for research out of our own resources instead of through bundled trading commissions, which could increase our firm's expenses and decrease our operating income.
Additionally, in July 2017 the Chief Executive of the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”), which regulates the London Interbank Offered Rate, or “LIBOR,” as a “benchmark” or “reference rate” for various interest rate calculations, announced that the FCA will no longer persuade or compel banks to submit rates for the calculation of the LIBOR benchmark after 2021. In November 2020, the ICE Benchmark Administration Limited announced a plan to extend the date as of which most U.S. LIBOR values would cease being computed from December 31, 2021 to June 30, 2023. Although financial regulators and industry working groups have suggested alternative reference rates, global consensus on alternative rates is lacking and the process for amending existing contracts or instruments to transition away from LIBOR remains unclear. The elimination of LIBOR or changes to other reference rates or any other changes or reforms to the determination or supervision of reference rates may adversely affect the amount of interest payable or interest receivable on certain of our firm's portfolio investments. These changes may also impact the market liquidity and market value of these portfolio investments. We are finalizing our global assessment of exposure in relation to funds utilizing LIBOR based instruments and benchmarks. Further, we are prioritizing the mitigation of risks associated with the forecast changes to financial instruments and performance benchmarks referencing existing LIBOR rates, and concurrently any impact on AB portfolios and investment strategies.
Lastly, it also is uncertain how regulatory trends will further evolve, both in the U.S. and abroad. For example, following the Brexit referendum in June 2016, the U.K.'s departure from the European Union (the "EU") resulted in the U.K. leaving the EU Single Market on December 31, 2020. While the U.K. and the EU have agreed to a trade deal, which took effect on January 1, 2021, this deal does not include specific arrangements for financial services. Accordingly, since the start of 2021, our U.K.-based buy-side and sell-side subsidiaries have implemented alternative arrangements in EU jurisdictions (utilizing AB's EU-based subsidiaries) to ensure continued operations in the EU Single Market. These arrangements are subject to potential change due to ongoing negotiations between the U.K. and the EU on future regulatory cooperation, and it is difficult to ascertain how any such changes may impact the ability of our U.K.-based subsidiaries to provide services to EU-based clients in the future.
We are involved in various legal proceedings and regulatory matters and may be involved in such proceedings in the future, any one or combination of which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.
We may be involved in various matters, including regulatory inquiries, administrative proceedings and litigation, some of which allege significant damages, and we may be involved in additional matters in the future. Litigation is subject to significant uncertainties, particularly when plaintiffs allege substantial or indeterminate damages, the litigation is in its early stages, or when the litigation is highly complex or broad in scope.
Structure-related Risks
The partnership structure of AB Holding and AB limits Unitholders’ abilities to influence the management and operation of AB’s business and is highly likely to prevent a change in control of AB Holding and AB.
The General Partner, as general partner of both AB Holding and AB, generally has the exclusive right and full authority and responsibility to manage, conduct, control and operate their respective businesses, except as otherwise expressly stated in their respective Amended and Restated Agreements of Limited Partnership. AB Holding and AB Unitholders have more limited voting rights on matters affecting AB than do holders of common stock in a corporation. Both Amended and Restated Agreements of Limited Partnership provide that Unitholders do not have any right to vote for directors of the General Partner and that Unitholders only can vote on certain extraordinary matters (including removal of the General Partner under certain extraordinary circumstances). Additionally, the AB Partnership Agreement includes significant restrictions on the transfer of AB Units and provisions that have the practical effect of preventing the removal of the General Partner, which provisions are highly likely to prevent a change in control of AB’s management.
AB Units are illiquid and subject to significant transfer restrictions.
There is no public trading market for AB Units and we do not anticipate that a public trading market will develop. The AB Partnership Agreement restricts our ability to participate in a public trading market or anything substantially equivalent to one by providing that any transfer that may cause AB to be classified as a “publicly traded partnership” (“PTP”) as defined in
26
Table of Contents
Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), shall be deemed void and shall not be recognized by AB. In addition, AB Units are subject to significant restrictions on transfer, such as obtaining the written consent of EQH and the General Partner pursuant to the AB Partnership Agreement. Generally, neither EQH nor the General Partner will permit any transfer that it believes would create a risk that AB would be treated as a corporation for tax purposes. EQH and the General Partner have implemented a transfer program that requires a seller to locate a purchaser and imposes annual volume restrictions on transfers. You may request a copy of the transfer program from our Corporate Secretary (corporate_secretary@alliancebernstein.com). Also, we have filed the transfer program as Exhibit 10.07 to this Form 10-K.
Changes in the partnership structure of AB Holding and AB and/or changes in the tax law governing partnerships would have significant tax ramifications.
AB Holding, having elected under Section 7704(g) of the Code to be subject to a 3.5% federal tax on partnership gross income from the active conduct of a trade or business, is a “grandfathered” PTP for federal income tax purposes. AB Holding is also subject to the 4.0% New York City unincorporated business tax (“UBT”), net of credits for UBT paid by AB. In order to preserve AB Holding’s status as a “grandfathered” PTP for federal income tax purposes, management seeks to ensure that AB Holding does not directly or indirectly (through AB) enter into a substantial new line of business. A “new line of business” includes any business that is not closely related to AB’s historical business of providing research and diversified investment management and related services to its clients. A new line of business is “substantial” when a partnership derives more than 15% of its gross income from, or uses more than 15% of its total assets in, the new line of business.
AB is a private partnership for federal income tax purposes and, accordingly, is not subject to federal and state corporate income taxes. However, AB is subject to the 4.0% UBT. Domestic corporate subsidiaries of AB, which are subject to federal, state and local income taxes, generally are included in the filing of a consolidated federal income tax return with separate state and local income tax returns being filed. Each of AB's non-U.S. corporate subsidiaries generally is subject to taxes in the foreign jurisdiction where it is located. If our business increasingly operates in countries other than the U.S., AB’s effective tax rate will increase as our international subsidiaries are subject to corporate taxes in the jurisdictions where they are located.
In order to preserve AB’s status as a private partnership for federal income tax purposes, AB Units must not be considered publicly traded. If such units were to be considered readily tradable, AB would be subject to federal and state corporate income tax on its net income. Furthermore, as noted above, should AB enter into a substantial new line of business, AB Holding, by virtue of its ownership of AB, would lose its status as a grandfathered PTP and would become subject to corporate income tax as set forth above. If AB and AB Holding were to become subject to corporate income tax as set forth above, their net income and quarterly distributions to Unitholders would be materially reduced. For information about the significant restrictions on transfer of AB Units, see the risk factor immediately above.
If, pursuant to the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 ("2015 Act"), any audit by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") of our income tax returns for any of our taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 results in any adjustments, the IRS may collect any resulting taxes, including any applicable penalties and interest, directly from us, in which case our net income and the cash available for quarterly Unitholder distributions may be substantially reduced.
Although the IRS, under current law, generally determines tax adjustments at the partnership level when it audits the income tax return of a partnership, the IRS, with respect to taxable years beginning on or before December 31, 2017, is required to collect any additional taxes, interest and penalties from the partnership's individual partners. The 2015 Act modifies this procedure for audits of a partnership’s taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and, if a partnership meets certain requirements and makes a proper election, for audits of a partnership’s taxable years beginning before January 1, 2018. We may choose to make such an election if we receive a written notice of selection for examination for an eligible taxable year or if we file, on or after January 1, 2018, an administrative adjustment request for an eligible taxable year and otherwise qualify to make such an election.
Generally, we will have the ability to collect tax liability from our Unitholders in accordance with their percentage interests during the year under audit, but there can be no assurance that we will elect to do so or be able to do so under all circumstances. If we do not collect such tax liability from our Unitholders in accordance with their percentage interests in the tax year under audit, our net income and the available cash for quarterly distributions to current Unitholders may be substantially reduced. Accordingly, our current Unitholders may bear some or all of the tax liability resulting from such audit adjustment, even if such Unitholders did not own Units during the tax year under audit. In particular, as a publicly traded partnership, our Partnership Representative (as defined below) may, in certain instances, request that any “imputed underpayment” resulting from an audit be adjusted by amounts of certain of our passive losses. If we successfully make such a request, we would have to reduce suspended passive loss carryovers in a manner which is binding on the partners.
27
Table of Contents
For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, a "partnership representative" that we designate (a “Partnership Representative”) will have the sole authority to act on our behalf for purposes of, among other things, U.S. federal income tax audits and judicial review of administrative adjustments by the IRS. If we do not make such a designation, the IRS can select any person as the Partnership Representative. Any actions taken by us or by the Partnership Representative on our behalf with respect to, among other things, U.S. federal income tax audits and judicial review of administrative adjustments by the IRS, will be binding on us and our Unitholders.
In addition, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, we may, but are not required to, make an election to require our Unitholders to take into account on their income tax returns an audit adjustment made to our income tax items, also known as a “push-out” election. Also, a partnership that is a partner of another partnership may elect to have its unitholders take an audit adjustment of the lower-tier partnership into account (i.e., the upper-tier partnership may push adjustments received from the lower-tier partnership through to the partners of the upper-tier partnership). The upper-tier partnership must timely complete the “push-out” of the adjustment in order for it to be effective. Such election must be made by the extended due date for the return for the adjustment year of the audited partnership, regardless of whether the audited partnership is required to file a return for the adjustment year or timely files a request for an extension for its return. There are a number of requirements to make a “push-out” election and we may be unable or unwilling to comply with such requirements. If we do not make a “push-out” election, we would be required to pay any tax resulting from the adjustments to our income tax items, and the cash available for distribution to unitholders would be substantially reduced.
Non-U.S. unitholders may be subject to a 10% withholding tax on the sale of their AB Units or AB Holding Units, which could reduce the value of such Units.
Gain or loss from the sale or exchange of partnership units after November 27, 2017 by a non-U.S. unitholder are treated as effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business to the extent that the non-U.S. unitholder would have had effectively connected gain or loss on a hypothetical sale by the partnership of all of its assets at fair market value as of the date of the sale or exchange of the partnership units. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act also imposed certain withholding requirements for the sale of partnership units by a non-U.S. unitholder and authorized the IRS to issue regulations to carry out the withholding rules in the case of publicly traded partnerships. The requirement to withhold on amounts realized in connection with the sale, exchange or disposition of certain interests in a publicly traded partnership (including by brokers) is suspended under Notice 2018-08 for transfers that occur before January 1, 2022, and therefore no withholding will apply. On November 30, 2020, the IRS published final regulations (the "1446 Final Regulations") that address withholding tax and information reporting with respect to interests in publicly traded partnerships engaged in a U.S. trade or business. The 1446 Final Regulations end the suspension of withholding on the sale, exchange or disposition of certain interests in a publicly traded partnership, effective January 1, 2022, but place the primary responsibility for such withholding obligations for transfers effected through brokers on the broker, and not the publicly trade partnership. However, a publicly traded partnership may be liable for any under-withholding by a broker that relies on a qualified notice for which the publicly traded partnership failed to make a reasonable estimate of the amounts required for determining the applicability of the "ten percent exception." The "ten percent exception" applies if, either (1) the publicly traded partnership was not engaged in a U.S. trade or business during a specified period of time, or (2) upon a hypothetical sale of the publicly traded partnership's assets at fair market value, (i) the amount of net gain that would have been effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States would be less than 10 percent of the total net gain, or (ii) no gain would have been effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States.
We may be liable for any under-withholding by nominees on our Unitholder distributions after January 1, 2022.
Under the 1446 Final Regulations, for distributions made after January 1, 2022, a publicly traded partnership must post on its primary public website (and keep accessible for 10 years), and deliver to any registered holder that is a nominee, a qualified notice that states the amount of a distribution that is attributable to each type of income group specified in the 1446 Final Regulations. If the qualified notice is incorrect such that it causes a broker to under-withhold with respect to an amount in excess of cumulative net income, the publicly traded partnership is liable for any under-withholding on such amount.
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments
Neither AB nor AB Holding has unresolved comments from the staff of the SEC to report.
28
Table of Contents
Item 2.Properties
Our principal executive offices located at 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York are occupied pursuant to a lease expiring in 2024. At this location, we currently lease 999,963 square feet of space, within which we currently occupy approximately 512,284 square feet of space and have sub-let (or are seeking to sub-let) approximately 487,679 square feet of space.
In addition, we lease approximately 229,147 square feet of space at One North Lexington, White Plains, New York under a lease expiring in 2021. At this location, we currently do not occupy any space and have sub-let (or are seeking to sub-let) the full 229,147 square feet of space.
We entered into a 20-year lease agreement in New York, New York, at 66 Hudson Boulevard, for 190,000 square feet that is expected to commence in 2024. During the fourth quarter of 2020, we exercised an option whereby we were able to reduce our committed footprint by half a floor, reducing our square feet commitment from 190,000 square feet to approximately 166,000 square feet.
We entered into short-term leases for office space in Nashville, Tennessee during the construction of our new corporate headquarters at 501 Commerce Street, which we will vacate upon completion of 501 Commerce Street.
We entered into a 15-year lease agreement in Nashville, Tennessee, at 501 Commerce Street, for 218,976 square feet that commenced in the fourth quarter of 2020.
We also lease 50,792 square feet of space in San Antonio, Texas under a lease expiring April 30, 2029 with options to extend through 2039.
In addition, we lease less significant amounts of space in 23 other cities in the United States.
Our subsidiaries lease space in 30 cities outside the United States, the most significant of which are in London, England, under a lease expiring in 2022, and in Hong Kong, China, under a lease expiring in 2027. In London, we currently lease 65,488 square feet of space, within which we currently occupy approximately 54,746 square feet of space and have sub-let approximately 10,742 square feet of space. In Hong Kong, we currently lease and occupy 35,878 square feet of space.
Item 3.Legal Proceedings
With respect to all significant litigation matters, we consider the likelihood of a negative outcome. If we determine the likelihood of a negative outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, we record an estimated loss for the expected outcome of the litigation. If the likelihood of a negative outcome is reasonably possible and we are able to determine an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss in excess of amounts already accrued, if any, we disclose that fact together with the estimate of the possible loss or range of loss. However, it is often difficult to predict the outcome or estimate a possible loss or range of loss because litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, particularly when plaintiffs allege substantial or indeterminate damages. Such is also the case when the litigation is in its early stages or when the litigation is highly complex or broad in scope. In these cases, we disclose that we are unable to predict the outcome or estimate a possible loss or range of loss.
AB may be involved in various matters, including regulatory inquiries, administrative proceedings and litigation, some of which may allege significant damages. It is reasonably possible that we could incur losses pertaining to these matters, but we cannot currently estimate any such losses.
Management, after consultation with legal counsel, currently believes that the outcome of any individual matter that is pending or threatened, or all of them combined, will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity. However, any inquiry, proceeding or litigation has an element of uncertainty; management cannot determine whether further developments relating to any individual matter that is pending or threatened, or all of them combined, will have a material adverse effect on our results of operation, financial condition or liquidity in any future reporting period.
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
29
Table of Contents
PART II
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market for AB Holding Units and AB Units; Cash Distributions
AB Holding Units are listed on the NYSE and trade publicly under the ticker symbol “AB.” There is no established public trading market for AB Units, which are subject to significant restrictions on transfer. For information about these transfer restrictions, see “Structure-related Risks” in Item 1A.
AB Holding’s principal source of income and cash flow is attributable to its limited partnership interests in AB.
Each of AB Holding and AB distributes on a quarterly basis all of its Available Cash Flow, as defined in the AB Holding Partnership Agreement and the AB Partnership Agreement, respectively, to its Unitholders and the General Partner. For additional information concerning distribution of Available Cash Flow by AB Holding, see Note 2 to AB Holding’s financial statements in Item 8. For additional information concerning distribution of Available Cash Flow by AB, see Note 2 to AB’s consolidated financial statements in Item 8.
On December 31, 2020, the closing price of an AB Holding Unit on the NYSE was $33.77 per Unit. On December 31, 2020, there were (i) 974 AB Holding Unitholders of record for approximately 81,000 beneficial owners, and (ii) 378 AB Unitholders of record (we do not believe there are substantial additional beneficial owners).
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities
We did not engage in any unregistered sales of our securities during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
Each quarter since the third quarter of 2011, AB has implemented plans to repurchase AB Holding Units pursuant to Rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the Exchange Act. The plan adopted during the fourth quarter of 2020 expired at the close of business on February 10, 2021. AB may adopt additional plans in the future to engage in open-market purchases of AB Holding Units to help fund anticipated obligations under the firm’s incentive compensation award program and for other corporate purposes. For additional information about Rule 10b5-1 plans, see “Units Outstanding” in Item 7.
30
Table of Contents
AB Holding Units bought by us or one of our affiliates during the fourth quarter of 2020 are as follows:
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(1)During the fourth quarter of 2020, we purchased 2,221,913 AB Holding Units from employees to allow them to fulfill statutory withholding tax requirements at the time of distribution of long-term incentive compensation awards.
(2)During the fourth quarter of 2020, we purchased 721,615 AB Holding Units on the open market pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan to help fund anticipated obligations under our incentive compensation award program.
AB Units bought by us or one of our affiliates during the fourth quarter of 2020 are as follows:
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
(1)During December 2020, we purchased 800 AB Units in a private transaction.
31
Table of Contents
Item 6.Selected Financial Data
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
The following selected financial data is derived from the consolidated financial statements of AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. and provides summary historical financial information for the periods ended and as of the dates indicated:
Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per unit amounts)
Income statement data:
Balance sheet data at period end:
________________________
(1)AB Holding is required to distribute all of its Available Cash Flow, as defined in the AB Holding Partnership Agreement, to its Unitholders; for all years presented, the cash distributions per unit reflect the impact of AB’s non-GAAP adjustments.
32
Table of Contents
AllianceBernstein L.P.
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per unit amounts and unless otherwise indicated)
INCOME STATEMENT DATA:
Revenues:
Expenses:
Employee compensation and benefits:
Promotion and servicing:
General and administrative:
33
Table of Contents
Years Ended December 31,
BALANCE SHEET DATA AT PERIOD END:
(1)Operating income excluding net (loss) income attributable to non-controlling interests as a percentage of net revenues.
(2) Cash distributions per AB Unit reflect the impact of AB's non-GAAP adjustments. Refer to Item 7 for additional information concerning our non-GAAP adjustments.
34
Table of Contents
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Impact of COVID-19
General Economic Conditions
During the first quarter of 2020, COVID-19 significantly impacted the global economy. The impact has been profound, has continued through the fourth quarter of 2020 and is likely to persist for months to come. While many businesses have re-opened, vaccinations have begun and leading economic indicators are showing signs of improvement, the overall extent and duration of COVID-19's impact on businesses and economic activity generally remains unclear. A recession in the near term remains possible. Economic effects from COVID-19, which have impacted virtually all countries and industries, include:
•Many small and large businesses being forced to interrupt their operations and as a result, lay off employees or even close;
•The re-opening and subsequent shuttering again of certain businesses in various countries around the world;
•Temporary large-scale population lock-downs, domestic and international travel restrictions and social-distancing measures were implemented, driving sharp declines in consumer and business spending. Further, while many businesses have re-opened, some are only allowing limited capacity, imposing social distancing restrictions and providing limited hours of operation, and while consumer spending has improved during the second half of 2020, uncertainty remains;
•Schools, many of which were shuttered during the first quarter, have allowed students to return to in-person instruction, but the constant concern and uncertainty of whether an outbreak may occur, have forced many schools to re-implement remote instruction, creating significant strain and uncertainty for working parents, which may slow or reverse the economicrecovery;
•Significant declines and increased volatility impacted global financial markets during the first quarter, including 23.2% and 20.0% declines in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (“Dow”) and S&P 500 Index (“S&P”), respectively. Although the financial markets recovered their first quarter losses to new highs in the months since, the prospect of continued volatility remains, especially given the uncertainty surrounding the continued economic effects of the virus (please see "Market Environment" below for additional details).
•The initial distribution of multiple COVID-19 vaccinations was initiated in the later part of the fourth quarter, but the speed, selective nature and logistical challenges of distribution, and the concerns in some communities around the safety and efficacy of the vaccine, have caused turmoil for many, further heightening the anxiety around the virus.
Governments around the world have responded to COVID-19 with economic stimulus measures, including a $2 trillion emergency relief bill passed in the U.S during the first quarter of 2020 and an additional $900 billion in aid passed during the fourth quarter of 2020. Similar fiscal stimulus was passed by many governments around the world. These measures and possible additional stimulus and aid measures are intended to steady businesses and consumers until economic activity meaningfully recovers. The timing and magnitude of any such recovery, however, remains uncertain.
Various countries around the world have continued to experience surges in the rates of COVID-19 infections, which are likely the result of greatly increased social interactions, including at colleges and universities, after re-opening of economies, as well as more contagious strains of the virus. As a result, several countries have paused the continued progression of their re-openings or re-imposed closing mandates on certain businesses, such as bars, restaurants and entertainment venues. These circumstances may adversely affect consumer sentiment and the pace of business re-openings, and they also may delay any economic recovery.
AB Impact
At the initial onset of COVID-19 during the first quarter of 2020, we quickly responded in the various jurisdictions where we operate, including the U.S., the U.K., Hong Kong, Shanghai, Singapore and Taiwan. We implemented business continuity measures, including travel restrictions and a work-from-home requirement for almost all personnel (other than a relatively small number of employees whose physical presence in our offices was considered critical), which has remained in place (except in our Asia offices, most of which have reopened) throughout the second, third and fourth quarters, to ensure operating continuity for all critical functions. We also instituted a notification process for any employee who tests positive for COVID-19 or has been exposed to someone else who has tested positive. As the COVID-19 crisis has continued to evolve since the lockdown in the first quarter, certain key functions of the business, such as Risk Management, Business Continuity, Finance and Human Capital, have maintained constant communication and monitored the evolution of the pandemic to keep our employees safe and advise of key developments. Additionally, we continue to monitor communications from the World Health Organization and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to ensure we have current information.
35
Table of Contents
We have continued to enhance our technology, which has increased the effectiveness of our remote work force. We have also continued to enhance our virtual programs to support business functions, such as training on cybersecurity and enhancements to our existing technology platforms. There has been a heightened focus on the emotional well-being of our employees, and we have provided regular touch points with employees through virtual town halls and management communications. Additionally, we have maintained regular communications and updates on the virus and the Company's response, which are posted on the Company's internal website, to ensure transparent communication with our employees. If any of our employees test positive for COVID-19 or interact with someone who has the virus, they are required to contact AB immediately for support and contact-tracing.
We continue to consider, and in some cases methodically implement, return to office programs for our U.S., European and Asia offices. However, we continue to monitor the daily evolution of the crisis in order to ensure the health and safety of our employees remains our top priority. We will modify our return to office plans, as needed, to ensure the safety of our employees and to ensure that the highest safety and cleanliness protocols are followed. We believe that our business continuity plan and technology platform will continue to support the effectiveness of our employees working remotely.
Asset managers, such as AB, rely heavily on the performance of the financial markets largely to determine assets under management (“AUM”) and revenues. Our results during the first quarter of 2020 were strong, which was primarily a reflection of financial market conditions during January and February, which were not adversely affected by COVID-19. Market conditions deteriorated dramatically during March, which negatively impacted our performance in that month. Financial markets, and hence our performance, rebounded during the ensuing months, primarily due to a U.S. Federal Government stimulus package and U.S. Treasury programs, which were instituted during March 2020 and throughout the second quarter. These programs renewed confidence in the financial markets by introducing liquidity through government purchasing of financial instruments. As various states and countries around the world eased restrictions on business and lockdown protocols during the second quarter and increasingly throughout the third and fourth quarters, increases in consumer spending, decreases in the unemployment rate and improvement in other leading economic indicators have stimulated domestic and global financial market performance. As a result of these developments, our AUM has increased in the second, third and fourth quarters. However, as U.S. states and countries globally have continued to ease restrictions, there has been a resurgence in the spread of the virus, causing certain states and countries to, among other things, shutter some businesses again or impose new social distancing restrictions. As a result, market volatility continues.
The economic impact of COVID-19 and any additional declines in the financial markets could have a significant adverse effect on our AUM and revenues, particularly if economic activity does not continue to recover. Although countries throughout the world continue to grapple with re-opening their economies, this will continue to be a gradual process, and there is a significant risk that the opening process may be further interrupted if infection rates increase. Also, although unemployment rates have declined, they are still considered high and any reluctance of consumers to resume spending will do long-term damage to the global economy, which would have an adverse effect on our business. Additionally, as most of our workforce is working remotely, we are mindful of increased risk related to cybersecurity, which could significantly disrupt our business functions.
Ultimately, the return to normal business and economic activity will likely require the broad application of effective vaccines. Although the distribution of multiple vaccines was initiated towards the end of the fourth quarter, the speed, selective nature of those who are eligible to receive the vaccination, as well as logistical challenges regarding availability and distribution of the vaccines, could mean many months until the general population has been vaccinated.
Executive Overview
Percentage change figures are calculated using assets under management rounded to the nearest million and financial statement amounts rounded to the nearest thousand.
Our total assets under management ("AUM") as of December 31, 2020 were $685.9 billion, up $63.0 billion, or 10.1%, during 2020. The increase was driven primarily by market appreciation of $65.4 billion, partially offset by net outflows of $2.6 billion (due to Private Wealth Management net outflows of $2.0 billion and Retail net outflows of $1.6 billion, offset by Institutional net inflows of $1.0 billion). Excluding AXA's redemption of low-fee fixed income mandates of $11.8 billion, the firm generated net inflows of $9.2 billion in 2020.
Institutional AUM increased $32.9 billion, or 11.6%, to $315.6 billion during 2020, primarily due to market appreciation of $30.5 billion and net inflows of $1.0 billion. Gross sales increased $13.8 billion, from $17.1 billion in 2019 to $30.9 billion in 2020. Redemptions and terminations increased $11.3 billion, from $12.0 billion in 2019 to $23.3 billion in 2020. Excluding AXA's redemption of low-fee fixed income mandates of $11.8 billion, institutional net inflows were $12.8 billion in 2020.
Retail AUM increased $26.1 billion, or 10.9%, to $265.3 billion during 2020, primarily due to market appreciation of $28.1 billion, partially offset by net outflows of $1.6 billion. Gross sales increased $3.6 billion, from $75.3 billion in 2019 to $78.9
36
Table of Contents
billion in 2020. Redemptions and terminations increased $25.5 billion, from $44.0 billion in 2019 to $69.5 billion in 2020, due to record first quarter 2020 redemptions, reflecting the financial market sell-off in March amidst the onset of COVID-19.
Private Wealth Management AUM increased $4.0 billion, or 3.9%, to $105.0 billion during 2020, primarily due to market appreciation of $6.8 billion, partially offset by net outflows of $2.0 billion. Gross sales increased $3.0 billion, from $11.3 billion in 2019 to $14.3 billion in 2020. Redemptions and terminations increased $4.1 billion, from $12.4 billion in 2019 to $16.5 billion in 2020.
Bernstein Research Services revenue increased $51.8 million, or 12.7%, in 2020. The increase was due to higher market volatility, particularly between March and June 2020, primarily as a result of COVID-19, which led to higher customer activity and greater global trading volumes. We expect customer activity and trading volumes to gradually decrease in 2021 and to normalize in 2022, as the volatility surrounding COVID-19 begins to decline. Any decreases in customer activity and trading volumes will have a corresponding effect on Bernstein Research services revenue. Furthermore, all of 2020 reflects the inclusion of revenues from our acquisition of Autonomous Research ("Autonomous"), which closed on April 1, 2019.
Our 2020 net revenues of $3.7 billion increased $190.1 million, or 5.4%, compared to the prior year's net revenues. The most significant contributors to the increase were higher base advisory fees of $90.4 million, higher distribution revenues of $74.7 million, higher Bernstein Research Services revenue of $51.8 million and higher performance-based fees of $33.0 million, partially offset by higher investment losses of $55.1 million and lower net dividend and interest income of $11.9 million. Our operating expenses of $2.8 billion increased $106.1 million, or 3.9%, compared to the prior year's expenses. The increase primarily was due to higher promotion and servicing expenses of $63.6 million, higher employee compensation and benefits of $51.4 million and higher general and administrative expenses (including real estate charges) of $3.0 million, partially offset by lower amortization of intangible assets of $7.4 million and lower interest on borrowings of $6.9 million. Our operating income increased $84.0 million, or 10.2%, to $907.4 million from $823.4 million in 2019 and our operating margin increased from 22.6% in 2019 to 24.6% in 2020.
Market Environment
Despite 2020 being a year marked by a global pandemic, record-breaking recession and unemployment levels, and a contentious U.S. presidential election, equity markets closed the year with solid gains. The S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq each rallied for most of the fourth quarter, finishing the year in positive territory. In the U.S., the presidential election passed with a market-friendly outcome, the distribution of multiple COVID-19 vaccines was initiated and the unemployment rate continued to decline. Meanwhile, after months of deadlock, a COVID-19 relief package was passed in the fourth quarter, consisting of direct payments, unemployment benefits and small business aid. However, even with the increasing likelihood of COVID-19 vaccines potentially boosting activity in 2021, significant slack in the economy and labor market by the end of this year are likely. As a result, the U.S. Federal Reserve will likely keep interest rates near zero as the economy improves.
In the U.K., COVID-19 and Brexit uncertainty resulted in the worst performing year for its equity market since the 2008 financial crisis. However, with a Brexit deal reached in the final days of 2020 between the U.K. and the E.U. and the distribution of a COVID-19 vaccine, the U.K. economy may rebound in 2021. The Bank of England is likely to keep rates on hold during the recovery phase. In China, the economy has returned to almost pre-pandemic output levels. Chinese efforts to re-center the economy on a consumer-led model are expected to continue and fiscal policy will likely remain supportive through 2021. More stimulus may be announced in the first quarter of 2021 as the government continues to support consumption. While the economic outlook for China in 2021 appears positive, one big unknown is the future of the relationship between China and the new U.S. administration.
MiFID II
In Europe, MiFID II, which became effective on January 3, 2018, has made significant modifications to the manner in which European broker-dealers can be compensated for research. These modifications are believed to have significantly reduced the overall research spend by European buy-side firms, which has decreased the revenues we derive from our European clients. Our European clients may continue to reduce their research budgets, which could result in a significant decline in our sell-side revenues.
Also, while MiFID II is not applicable to firms operating outside of Europe, competitive and client pressures may force buy-side firms operating outside of Europe to pay for research from their own resources instead of through bundled trading commissions. If that occurs, we would expect that research budgets from those clients will decrease further, which could result in an additional significant decline in our sell-side revenues. Additionally, these competitive and client pressures may result in our buy-side operation paying for research out of our own resources instead of through bundled trading commissions, which could increase our firm's expenses and decrease our operating income.
37
Table of Contents
The ultimate impact of MiFID II on payments for research globally remains uncertain.
Equitable Holdings IPO
During the second quarter of 2018, AXA S.A. ("AXA") completed the sale of a minority stake in Equitable Holdings, Inc. (“EQH”) through an initial public offering ("IPO"). Since then, AXA has completed additional offerings and taken other steps, most recently during the fourth quarter of 2019. As a result, AXA owned less than 10% of the outstanding common stock of EQH as of December 31, 2020.
While we cannot at this time predict the full impact on AB of this transaction, such impact has included a reduction in the support AXA provided to AB in the past with respect to AB's investment management business, resulting in a modest decrease in our revenues and ability to initiate new investment services. Also, AB relies on AXA, including its subsidiary, AXA Business Services, for several significant services and AB has benefited from its affiliation with AXA in certain common vendor relationships. Some of these arrangements have changed, and others are expected to change, with immaterial financial implications for AB.
Our ending AUM at December 31, 2020 reflects $11.8 billion in 2020 outflows resulting from AXA's redemption of certain low-fee fixed income mandates. We expect these redemptions to total approximately $14 billion, with the remaining redemptions expected to be completed during the first half of 2021. The revenue we earn from the management of these assets is not significant.
Relocation Strategy
On May 2, 2018, we announced that we would establish our corporate headquarters in, and relocate approximately 1,050 jobs located in the New York metro area to, Nashville, TN. Subsequently, on January 14, 2020, we announced our plans to relocate an additional 200 jobs to Nashville thereby increasing the total relocated jobs to 1,250. The decision to add the additional jobs was the result of the growth in our business, select investments we are making, and the in-sourcing of roles typically performed by consultants. Our Nashville headquarters will house Finance, IT, Operations, Legal, Compliance, Internal Audit, Human Capital, and Sales and Marketing. We have been actively relocating jobs and expect this transition to take several years. We will continue to maintain a principal location in New York City, which will house our Portfolio Management, Sell-Side Research and Trading, and New York-based Private Wealth Management businesses.
We believe relocating our corporate headquarters to Nashville will afford us the opportunity to provide an improved quality of life alternative for our employees and enable us to attract and recruit new talented employees to a highly desirable location while improving the long-term cost structure of the firm.
During the transition period, which began in 2018 and is expected to continue through 2024, we currently estimate we will incur transition costs of approximately $145 million to $155 million, which is less than our previous estimate of $155 million to $165 million. These costs include employee relocation, severance, recruitment, and overlapping compensation and occupancy costs. Over this same period, we expect to realize total expense savings of approximately $205 million to $215 million, which is greater than our previous estimate of $185 million to $195 million, and is an amount greater than the total transition costs. However, we did incur some transition costs before we began to realize expense savings. For the period beginning in 2018 and ending in 2020, we incurred $70 million of cumulative transition costs compared to $46 million of cumulative savings. In 2020, expense savings of $30 million were greater than transition costs of $26 million, resulting in a net increase of $0.01 in net income per unit (“EPU”). We currently anticipate an EPU increase in 2021 of approximately $0.02 and expect to achieve increasing EPU accretion in each year thereafter. Beginning in 2025, once the transition period has been completed, we estimate ongoing annual expense savings towards the upper end of the range of $75 million to $80 million, which will result from a combination of occupancy and compensation-related savings. Our estimates for both the transition costs and the corresponding expense savings are based upon our current assumptions of employee relocation costs, severance, and overlapping compensation and occupancy costs. In addition, our estimates for both the timing of when we incur transition costs and realize the related expense savings are based on our current relocation implementation plan and the timing for execution of each phase. The actual total charges we eventually record, the related expense savings we realize, and timing of EPU impact may differ from our current estimates as we implement each phase of our headquarters relocation.
During October 2018, we signed a lease, which commenced in the fourth quarter of 2020, relating to 218,976 square feet of space at our new Nashville headquarters. Our estimated total base rent obligation (excluding taxes, operating expenses and utilities) over the 15-year initial lease term is $134 million.
38
Table of Contents
Although we have presented our transition costs and annual expense savings with numerical specificity, and we believe these targets to be reasonable as of the date of this report, the uncertainties surrounding the assumptions we discuss above create a significant risk that these targets may not be achieved. Accordingly, the expenses we actually incur and the savings we actually realize may differ from our targets, particularly if actual events adversely differ from one or more of our key assumptions. The transition costs and expense savings, together with their underlying assumptions, are Forward-Looking Statements and can be affected by any of the factors discussed in “Risk Factors” and “Cautions Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in this 10-K. We strongly caution investors not to place undue reliance on any of these assumptions or our cost and expense targets. Except as may be required by applicable securities laws, we are not under any obligation, and we expressly disclaim any obligation, to update or alter any assumptions, estimates, financial goals, targets, projections or other related statements that we may make.
Adjusted Operating Margin Target
We previously adopted a goal of increasing our adjusted operating margin to a target of 30% by 2020 (the “2020 Margin Target”), subject to the assumptions, factors and contingencies described as part of our initial disclosure of this target. Our adjusted operating margin, which was 27.5% for 2019, increased to 30.1% for 2020, achieving our target. We do not currently expect to set a new adjusted operating margin target going forward.
Our AUM and, therefore, our investment advisory revenues, including performance-based fee revenues, are heavily dependent on the level and volatility of the financial markets, which ended 2020 favorably. Despite the challenges faced from the COVID-19 pandemic (please refer to “Impact of COVID-19” above and “Risk Factors” in Item 1A), we benefited from certain of our adjusted operating expenses declining significantly, such as costs associated with travel and entertainment and client meetings during 2020. We do not anticipate the COVID-19-related cost-savings or market tailwinds to be indicative of future performance. We also expect continued investments in growth initiatives for our firm. Considering these factors, our adjusted operating margin may be less favorable in future periods, although we will continue to strive for improvement over the long-term.
AB Holding
AB Holding’s principal source of income and cash flow is attributable to its investment in AB Units. The AB Holding financial statements, notes to the financial statements and and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with those of AB.
Results of Operations
Years Ended December 31, % Change
(in thousands, except per unit amounts)
Weighted average equity ownership interest 35.6 % 35.4 % 35.7 %
________________________
(1)Distributions reflect the impact of AB’s non-GAAP adjustments.
AB Holding had net income of $279.4 million in 2020 compared to $238.6 million in 2019, reflecting higher net income attributable to AB Unitholders. AB Holding had net income of $238.6 million in 2019 compared to $242.4 million in 2018, reflecting lower net income attributable to AB Unitholders and lower weighted average equity ownership interest.
AB Holding's partnership gross income is derived from its interest in AB. AB Holding’s income taxes, which reflect a 3.5% federal tax on its partnership gross income from the active conduct of a trade or business, are computed by multiplying certain AB qualifying revenues (primarily U.S. investment advisory fees, brokerage commissions and direct payments for research services) by AB Holding’s ownership interest in AB, multiplied by the 3.5% tax rate. AB Holding’s effective tax rate was 9.4% in 2020, 10.4% in 2019 and 10.4% in 2018. See Note 6 to AB Holding’s financial statements in Item 8for a further description.
39
Table of Contents
As supplemental information, AB provides the performance measures “adjusted net revenues,” “adjusted operating income” and “adjusted operating margin,” which are the principal metrics management uses in evaluating and comparing the period-to-period operating performance of AB. Management principally uses these metrics in evaluating performance because they present a clearer picture of AB's operating performance and allow management to see long-term trends without the distortion primarily caused by long-term incentive compensation-related mark-to-market adjustments, real estate charges (discussed below in Adjusted Operating Income) and other adjustment items. Similarly, management believes that these management operating metrics help investors better understand the underlying trends in AB's results and, accordingly, provide a valuable perspective for investors. Such measures are not based on generally accepted accounting principles (“non-GAAP measures”). These non-GAAP measures are provided in addition to, and not as substitutes for, net revenues, operating income and operating margin, and they may not be comparable to non-GAAP measures presented by other companies. Management uses both GAAP and non-GAAP measures in evaluating the company’s financial performance. The non-GAAP measures alone may pose limitations because they do not include all of AB’s revenues and expenses. Further, adjusted diluted net income per AB Holding Unit is not a liquidity measure and should not be used in place of cash flow measures. See “Management Operating Metrics” in this Item 7.
The impact of these adjustments on AB Holding’s net income and diluted net income per AB Holding Unit are as follows:
Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per unit amounts)
AB Income tax benefit (expense) on non-GAAP adjustments (523) 1,070 (1,473)
Impact on AB Holding’s net income of AB non-GAAP adjustments 2,090 3,441 16,856
Diluted net income per AB Holding Unit, GAAP basis $ 2.88 $ 2.49 $ 2.50
Impact of AB non-GAAP adjustments 0.03 0.03 0.17
Adjusted diluted net income per AB Holding Unit $ 2.91 $ 2.52 $ 2.67
The degree to which AB’s non-GAAP adjustments impact AB Holding’s net income fluctuates based on AB Holding's ownership percentage in AB.
Tax Legislation
For a discussion of tax legislation, see “Risk Factors - Structure-related Risks” in Item 1A.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
During the year ended December 31, 2020, net cash provided by operating activities was $270.0 million, compared to $222.8 million during the corresponding 2019 period. The increase primarily resulted from higher cash distributions received from AB of $49.5 million. During the year ended December 31, 2019, net cash provided by operating activities was $222.8 million, compared to $279.3 million during the corresponding 2018 period. The decrease primarily resulted from lower cash distributions received from AB of $58.6 million.
During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, net cash used in investing activities was $0.1 million, $11.5 million and $16.6 million, respectively, reflecting investments in AB with proceeds from exercises of compensatory options to buy AB Holding Units.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, net cash used in financing activities was $269.9 million, compared to $211.2 million during the corresponding 2019 period. The increase primarily was due to higher cash distributions to Unitholders of $48.4
40
Table of Contents
million and lower proceeds from exercise of compensatory options to buy AB Holding Units of $11.4 million. During the year ended December 31, 2019, net cash used in financing activities was $211.2 million, compared to $262.7 million during the corresponding 2018 period. The decrease primarily was due to lower cash distributions to Unitholders of $58.2 million, partially offset by lower proceeds from exercise of compensatory options to buy AB Holding Units of $5.1 million.
Management believes that AB Holding will have the resources it needs to meet its financial obligations as a result of the cash flow AB Holding realizes from its investment in AB.
Cash Distributions
AB Holding is required to distribute all of its Available Cash Flow, as defined in the AB Holding Partnership Agreement, to its Unitholders (including the General Partner). Available Cash Flow typically is the adjusted diluted net income per unit for the quarter multiplied by the number of units outstanding at the end of the quarter. Management anticipates that Available Cash Flow will continue to be based on adjusted diluted net income per unit, unless management determines, with concurrence of the Board of Directors, that one or more adjustments made to adjusted net income should not be made with respect to the Available Cash Flow calculation. See Note 2 to AB Holding’s financial statements in Item 8 for a description of Available Cash Flow.
Commitments and Contingencies
For a discussion of commitments and contingencies, see Note 7 to AB Holding’s financial statements in Item 8.
41
Table of Contents
AB
Assets Under Management
Assets under management by distribution channel are as follows:
As of December 31, % Change
(in billions)
Assets under management by investment service are as follows:
As of December 31, % Change
(in billions)
Equity
Fixed Income
Actively Managed
Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions(2)
(1)Includes index and enhanced index services.
(2)Includes certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity or fixed income services.
42
Table of Contents
Changes in assets under management during 2020 and 2019 are as follows:
Distribution Channel
Institutions Retail PrivateWealthManagement Total
(in billions)
Long-term flows:
Cash flow/unreinvested dividends (6.6) (11.0) 0.2 (17.4)
Net long-term inflows (outflows)(2) 1.0 (1.6) (2.0) (2.6)
Acquisitions — 0.2 — 0.2
Long-term flows:
Cash flow/unreinvested dividends (2.7) (7.5) 0.1 (10.1)
Net long-term inflows (outflows) 2.4 23.8 (1.0) 25.2
Adjustments(1) — — (0.9) (0.9)
Transfers — 0.1 (0.1) —
(1)Approximately $900 million of non-investment management fee earning taxable and tax-exempt money market assets
were removed from assets under management during the second quarter of 2019.
(2)Institutional net flows for 2020 include $11.8 billion of AXA redemptions of certain low-fee fixed income mandates.
43
Table of Contents
Investment Service
(in billions)
Long-term flows:
Acquisition — — — — — 0.2 0.2
Long-term flows:
Adjustments(4) — — (0.4) (0.5) — — (0.9)
(1)Includes index and enhanced index services.
(2)Includes certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity or fixed income services.
(3)Fixed income – taxable investment service net flows for 2020 include $11.8 billion of AXA redemptions of certain low-fee fixed income mandates.
(4)Approximately $900 million of non-investment management fee earning taxable and tax-exempt money market assets
were removed from assets under management during the second quarter of 2019.
44
Table of Contents
Net long-term inflows (outflows) for actively managed investment services as compared to passively managed investment services during 2020 and 2019 are as follows:
Years Ended December 31,
(in billions)
Actively Managed
Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions 4.5 4.0
Passively Managed
Fixed Income (1.6) (0.9)
Alternatives/Multi-Asset Solutions 0.5 0.5
Total net long-term (outflows) inflows $ (2.6) $ 25.2
Average assets under management by distribution channel and investment service are as follows:
Years Ended December 31, % Change
(in billions)
Distribution Channel:
Investment Service:
(1)Includes index and enhanced index services.
(2)Includes certain multi-asset solutions and services not included in equity or fixed income services.
During 2020, our Institutional channel average AUM of $285.9 billion increased $20.5 billion, or 7.7%, compared to 2019, primarily due to this AUM increasing $32.9 billion, or 11.6%, to $315.6 billion over the last twelve months. The $32.9 billion increase in AUM resulted primarily from market appreciation of $30.5 billion and net inflows of $1.0 billion. During 2019, our Institutional channel average AUM of $265.4 billion increased $7.3 billion, or 2.8%, compared to 2018, primarily due to this AUM increasing $36.4 billion, or 14.8%, to $282.7 billion during 2019. The $36.4 billion increase in AUM resulted from market appreciation of $34.0 billion and net inflows of $2.4 billion.
45
Table of Contents
During 2020, our Retail channel average AUM of $236.5 billion increased $24.2 billion, or 11.4%, compared to 2019, primarily due to this AUM increasing $26.1 billion, or 10.9%, to $265.3 billion over the last twelve months. The $26.1 billion increase in AUM resulted primarily from market appreciation of $28.1 billion, partially offset by net outflows of $1.6 billion. During 2019, our Retail channel average AUM of $212.3 billion increased $20.5 billion, or 10.7%, compared to 2018, primarily due to this AUM increasing $58.4 billion, or 32.3%, to $239.2 billion during 2019. The $58.4 billion increase in AUM resulted primarily from market appreciation of $34.5 billion and net inflows of $23.8 billion.
During 2020, our Private Wealth Management channel average AUM of $97.1 billion increased $0.6 billion, or 0.7%, compared to 2019, primarily due to this AUM increasing $4.0 billion, or 3.9%, to $105.0 billion over the last twelve months. The $4.0 billion increase in AUM resulted primarily from market appreciation of $6.8 billion, partially offset by net outflows of $2.0 billion. During 2019, our Private Wealth Management channel average AUM of $96.5 billion increased $2.2 billion, or 2.3%, compared to 2018, primarily due to this AUM increasing $11.7 billion, or 13.2%, to $101.0 billion during 2019. The $11.7 billion increase in AUM resulted from market appreciation of $13.7 billion, partially offset by net outflows of $1.0 billion and an adjustment of $0.9 billion in the second quarter of 2019 relating to the removal of non-investment management fee earning assets.
Absolute investment composite returns, gross of fees, and relative performance as of December 31, 2020 compared to benchmarks for certain representative Institutional equity and fixed income services are as follows:
1-Year 3-Year 5-Year
Global High Income - Hedged (fixed income)
Absolute return 3.6 % 4.7 % 7.8 %
Global Plus - Hedged (fixed income)
Intermediate Municipal Bonds (fixed income)
Relative return (vs. Lipper Short/Int. Blended Muni Fund Avg) 0.9 0.8 0.7
U.S. Strategic Core Plus (fixed income)
Relative return (vs. Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index) 0.5 0.4 0.8
Emerging Market Debt (fixed income)
Relative return (vs. JPM EMBI Global/JPM EMBI) 2.4 0.3 1.2
Sustainable Global Thematic
Relative return (vs. MSCI ACWI Index) 24.6 8.9 6.1
International Strategic Core Equity
Relative return (vs. MSCI EAFE Index) (0.9) 1.2 0.9
U.S. Small & Mid Cap Value
Relative return (vs. Russell 2500 Value Index) (0.3) (1.6) (0.1)
U.S. Strategic Value
Relative return (vs. Russell 1000 Value Index) (1.0) (4.0) (3.3)
46
Table of Contents
1-Year 3-Year 5-Year
U.S. Small Cap Growth
Relative return (vs. Russell 2000 Growth Index) 20.9 12.6 9.3
U.S. Large Cap Growth
Relative return (vs. Russell 1000 Growth Index) (3.1) 0.4 —
U.S. Small & Mid Cap Growth
Relative return (vs. Russell 2500 Growth Index) 13.5 5.2 3.8
Concentrated U.S. Growth
Relative return (vs. S&P 500 Index) 3.2 6.3 3.2
Select U.S. Equity
Relative return (vs. S&P 500 Index) (1.9) (0.8) (0.6)
Strategic Equities
Relative return (vs. Russell 3000 Index) (2.6) (0.8) (1.2)
Global Core Equity
Relative return (vs. MSCI ACWI Index) (5.0) 1.0 1.2
U.S. Strategic Core Equity
Relative return (vs. S&P 500 Index) (10.2) (2.1) (2.7)
Select U.S. Equity Long/Short
Relative return (vs. S&P 500 Index) (6.8) (4.4) (5.2)
47
Table of Contents
Consolidated Results of Operations
Years Ended December 31, % Change
(in thousands, except per unit amounts)
(1)Operating income excluding net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests as a percentage of net revenues.
Net income attributable to AB Unitholders for the year ended December 31, 2020 increased $113.9 million from the year ended December 31, 2019. The increase primarily is due to (in millions):
Higher base advisory fees $ 90.4
Higher distribution revenues 74.7
Higher Bernstein Research Services revenue 51.8
Higher performance-based fees 33.0
Lower amortization of intangible assets 7.4
Lower interest on borrowings 6.9
Higher promotion and servicing expenses (63.6)
Higher investment losses (55.1)
Higher employee compensation and benefits (51.4)
Lower net dividend and interest income (11.9)
Higher general and administrative expenses (including real estate charges) (3.0)
48
Table of Contents
Net income attributable to AB Unitholders for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased $5.5 million from the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease primarily was due to (in millions):
Higher employee compensation and benefits $ (64.0)
Higher promotion and servicing expenses (51.7)
Lower Bernstein Research Services revenue (31.5)
Lower performance-based fees (18.5)
Higher base advisory fees 128.4
Higher distribution revenues 36.5
Higher investment gains 36.0
Other (1.1)
Units Outstanding
Each quarter, we consider whether to implement a plan to repurchase AB Holding Units pursuant to Rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). A plan of this type allows a company to repurchase its shares at times when it otherwise might be prevented from doing so because of self-imposed trading blackout periods or because it possesses material non-public information. Each broker we select has the authority to repurchase AB Holding Units on our behalf in accordance with the terms and limitations specified in the plan. Repurchases are subject to regulations promulgated by the SEC, as well as certain price, market volume and timing constraints specified in the plan. The plan adopted during the fourth quarter of 2020 expired at the close of business on February 10, 2021. We may adopt additional plans in the future to engage in open-market purchases of AB Holding Units to help fund anticipated obligations under our incentive compensation award program and for other corporate purposes.
Cash Distributions
We are required to distribute all of our Available Cash Flow, as defined in the AB Partnership Agreement, to our Unitholders and the General Partner. Available Cash Flow typically is the adjusted diluted net income per unit for the quarter multiplied by the number of general and limited partnership interests at the end of the quarter. In future periods, management anticipates that Available Cash Flow will continue to be based on adjusted diluted net income per unit, unless management determines, with concurrence of the Board of Directors, that one or more adjustments that are made for adjusted net income should not be made with respect to the Available Cash Flow calculation. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements contained in Item 8 for a description of Available Cash Flow.
Management Operating Metrics
We are providing the non-GAAP measures “adjusted net revenues,” “adjusted operating income” and “adjusted operating margin” because they are the principal operating metrics management uses in evaluating and comparing period-to-period operating performance. Management principally uses these metrics in evaluating performance because they present a clearer picture of our operating performance and allow management to see long-term trends without the distortion primarily caused by long-term incentive compensation-related mark-to-market adjustments, real estate charges and other adjustment items. Similarly, we believe that these management operating metrics help investors better understand the underlying trends in our results and, accordingly, provide a valuable perspective for investors.
These non-GAAP measures are provided in addition to, and not as substitutes for, net revenues, operating income and operating margin, and they may not be comparable to non-GAAP measures presented by other companies. Management uses both accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("US GAAP") and non-GAAP measures in evaluating our financial performance. The non-GAAP measures alone may pose limitations because they do not include all of our revenues and expenses.
49
Table of Contents
Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands)
Adjustments:
Distribution-related adjustments:
Pass through adjustments:
Impact of consolidated company-sponsored funds 954 (33,044) (38,142)
Write-down on investment 859 — 3,733
Impact of adoption of revenue recognition standard ASC 606 — — 77,844
Other — — 47
Adjustments:
Long-term incentive compensation-related items (83) 1,217 3,064
CEO's EQH award compensation 802 1,125 —
Write-down of investment 859 — 3,733
Impact of adoption of revenue recognition standard ASC 606 — — 35,156
Other — — 47
Diluted net income per AB Unit, GAAP basis $ 3.19 $ 2.78 $ 2.78
Adjusted diluted net income per AB Unit $ 3.21 $ 2.81 $ 2.96
Adjusted operating margin 30.1 % 27.5 % 29.1 %
Adjusted operating income for the year ended December 31, 2020 increased $115.6 million, or 14.4%, from the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to higher investment advisory base fees of $74.1 million, higher Bernstein Research Services revenue of $51.8 million, lower promotion and servicing expenses of $33.4 million, higher performance-based fees of $33.2 million, lower amortization of intangibles of $7.4 million and lower interest on borrowings of $6.9 million, partially offset by higher employee compensation expenses (excluding the impact of long-term incentive compensation-related items) of $56.1 million, higher net investment losses of $22.8 million, lower net dividend and interest income of $8.5 million and higher general and administrative expenses of $8.2 million.
50
Table of Contents
Adjusted operating income for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased $49.6 million, or 5.8%, from the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to lower performance-based fees of $99.3 million, lower Bernstein Research Services revenue of $31.5 million, higher general and administrative expenses of $29.3 million and higher employee compensation expenses (excluding the impact of long-term incentive compensation-related items) of $8.3 million, offset by higher investment advisory base fees of $95.5 million and higher investments gains and losses revenue of $22.4 million.
On January 1, 2018, as a result of our adoption of ASC 606, we recorded a cumulative effect adjustment, net of tax, of $35.0 million to partners’ capital in the consolidated statement of financial condition. This amount represented carried interest distributions of $77.9 million previously received, net of revenue sharing payments to investment team members, of $42.7 million, with respect to which it was probable that significant reversal would not occur. These amounts were included in adjusted net revenues and adjusted operating income in the first quarter of 2018.
Adjusted Net Revenues
Net Revenue, as adjusted, is reduced to exclude all of the company's distribution revenues, which are recorded as a separate line item on the consolidated statement of income, as well as a portion of investment advisory services fees received that is used to pay distribution and servicing costs. For certain products, based on the distinct arrangements, certain distribution fees are collected by us and passed through to third-party client intermediaries, while for certain other products, we collect investment advisory services fees and a portion is passed through to third-party client intermediaries. In both arrangements, the third-party client intermediary owns the relationship with the client and is responsible for performing services and distributing the product to the client on our behalf. We believe offsetting distribution revenues and certain investment advisory services fees is useful for our investors and other users of our financial statements because such presentation appropriately reflects the nature of these costs as pass-through payments to third parties that perform functions on behalf of our sponsored mutual funds and/or shareholders of these funds. Distribution-related adjustments fluctuate each period based on the type of investment products sold, as well as the average AUM over the period. Also, we adjust distribution revenues for the amortization of deferred sales commissions as these costs, over time, will offset such revenues.
We adjust investment advisory and services fees and other revenues for pass through costs, primarily related to our transfer agent and shareholder servicing fees. These fees do not affect operating income, but they do affect our operating margin. As such, we exclude these fees from adjusted net revenues.
We adjust for the revenue impact of consolidating company-sponsored investment funds by eliminating the consolidated company-sponsored investment funds' revenues and including AB's fees from such consolidated company-sponsored investment funds and AB's investment gains and losses on its investments in such consolidated company-sponsored investment funds that were eliminated in consolidation.
Also, adjusted net revenues exclude investment gains and losses and dividends and interest on employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments.
During the first quarter of 2020, we wrote-off an investment that had been received in exchange for the sale of software technology, bringing the balance to zero. Previously, we had been excluding the value of this investment from adjusted net revenues.
Lastly, adjusted net revenues include the impact of our adoption of revenue recognition standard ASC 606 during the first quarter of 2018, asdiscussed above.
Adjusted Operating Income
Adjusted operating income represents operating income on a US GAAP basis excluding (1) real estate charges (credits), (2) the impact on net revenues and compensation expense of the investment gains and losses (as well as the dividends and interest) associated with employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments, (3) our CEO's EQH award compensation, as discussed below, (4) the write-down of an investment (discussed immediately above), (5) acquisition-related expenses, (6) adjustments to contingent payment arrangements, and (7) the impact of consolidated company-sponsored investment funds; provided, however, that adjusted operating income includes the revenues and expenses associated with our implementation of ASC 606 during the first quarter of 2018 discussed above.
Real estate charges (credits) have been excluded because they are not considered part of our core operating results when comparing financial results from period to period and to industry peers. However, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2019, real estate charges (credits), while excluded in the period in which the charges (credits) are recorded, are included ratably over the remaining applicable lease term.
51
Table of Contents
Prior to 2009, a significant portion of employee compensation was in the form of long-term incentive compensation awards that were notionally invested in AB investment services and generally vested over a period of four years. AB economically hedged the exposure to market movements by purchasing and holding these investments on its balance sheet. All such investments had vested as of year-end 2012 and the investments have been delivered to the participants, except for those investments with respect to which the participant elected a long-term deferral. Fluctuation in the value of these investments, which also impacts compensation expense, is recorded within investment gains and losses on the income statement. Management believes it is useful to reflect the offset achieved from economically hedging the market exposure of these investments in the calculation of adjusted operating income and adjusted operating margin. The non-GAAP measures exclude gains and losses and dividends and interest on employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments included in revenues and compensation expense.
The board of directors of EQH granted to Seth P. Bernstein (“CEO”), our President and Chief Executive Officer, equity awards in connection with EQH's IPO and Mr. Bernstein's membership on the EQH Management Committee. Mr. Bernstein may receive additional equity or cash compensation from EQH in the future related to his service on the Management Committee. Any awards granted to Mr. Bernstein by EQH are recorded as compensation expense in AB’s consolidated statement of income. The compensation expense associated with these awards has been excluded from our non-GAAP measures because they are non-cash and are based upon EQH's, and not AB's, financial performance.
The write-off of the investment discussed above in Adjusted Net Revenues has been excluded due to its non-recurring nature and because it is not part of our core operating results.
Acquisition-related expenses have been excluded because they are not considered part of our core operating results when comparing financial results from period to period and to industry peers. During 2020, these expenses included an intangible asset impairment charge of $1.5 million relating to our 2016 acquisition.
The recording of changes in estimates of contingent consideration payable with respect to contingent payment arrangements associated with our acquisitions are not considered part of our core operating results and, accordingly, have been excluded.
Adjusted net revenues include the impact of our adoption of revenue recognition standard ASC 606 during the first quarter of 2018, as discussed above.
We adjusted for the operating income impact of consolidating certain company-sponsored investment funds by eliminating the consolidated company-sponsored funds' revenues and expenses and including AB's revenues and expenses that were eliminated in consolidation. We also excluded the limited partner interests we do not own.
Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Diluted Net Income per AB Unit
As previously discussed, our quarterly distribution is typically our adjusted diluted net income per unit (which is derived from adjusted net income) for the quarter multiplied by the number of general and limited partnership interests at the end of the quarter. Adjusted income taxes, used in calculating adjusted net income, are calculated using the GAAP effective tax rate adjusted for non-GAAP income tax adjustments.
Adjusted Operating Margin
Adjusted operating margin allows us to monitor our financial performance and efficiency from period to period without the volatility noted above in our discussion of adjusted operating income and to compare our performance to industry peers on a basis that better reflects our performance in our core business. Adjusted operating margin is derived by dividing adjusted operating income by adjusted net revenues.
52
Table of Contents
Net Revenues
The components of net revenues are as follows:
Years Ended December 31, % Change
(in thousands)
Investment advisory and services fees:
Institutions:
Retail:
Private Wealth Management:
Total:
Investment Advisory and Services Fees
Investment advisory and services fees are the largest component of our revenues. These fees generally are calculated as a percentage of the value of AUM as of a specified date, or as a percentage of the value of average AUM for the applicable billing period, and vary with the type of investment service, the size of account and the total amount of assets we manage for a particular client. Accordingly, fee income generally increases or decreases as AUM increase or decrease and is affected by market appreciation or depreciation, the addition of new client accounts or client contributions of additional assets to existing accounts, withdrawals of assets from and termination of client accounts, purchases and redemptions of mutual fund shares, shifts of assets between accounts or products with different fee structures, and acquisitions. Our average basis points realized (investment advisory and services fees divided by average AUM) generally approximate 30 to 110 basis points for actively-managed equity services, 10 to 75 basis points for actively-managed fixed income services and 2 to 20 basis points for passively-managed services. Average basis points realized for other services could range from 4 basis points for certain Institutional third party managed services to over 100 basis points for certain Retail and Private Wealth Management alternative services. These ranges include all-inclusive fee arrangements (covering investment management, trade execution and other services) for our Private Wealth Management clients.
We calculate AUM using established market-based valuation methods and fair valuation (non-observable market) methods. Market-based valuation methods include: last sale/settle prices from an exchange for actively-traded listed equities, options and futures; evaluated bid prices from recognized pricing vendors for fixed income, asset-backed or mortgage-backed issues; mid prices from recognized pricing vendors and brokers for credit default swaps; and quoted bids or spreads from pricing vendors and brokers for other derivative products. Fair valuation methods include: discounted cash flow models or any other
53
Table of Contents
methodology that is validated and approved by our Valuation Committee (see paragraph immediately below for more information regarding our Valuation Committee). Fair valuation methods are used only where AUM cannot be valued using market-based valuation methods, such as in the case of private equity or illiquid securities.
The Valuation Committee, which consists of senior officers and employees, is responsible for overseeing the pricing and valuation of all investments held in client and AB portfolios. The Valuation Committee has adopted a Statement of Pricing Policies describing principles and policies that apply to pricing and valuing investments held in these portfolios. We also have a Pricing Group, which reports to the Valuation Committee and is responsible for overseeing the pricing process for all investments.
We sometimes charge our clients performance-based fees. In these situations, we charge a base advisory fee and are eligible to earn an additional performance-based fee or incentive allocation that is calculated as either a percentage of absolute investment results or a percentage of investment results in excess of a stated benchmark over a specified period of time. Some performance-based fees include a high-watermark provision, which generally provides that if a client account underperforms relative to its performance target (whether absolute or relative to a specified benchmark), it must gain back such underperformance before we can collect future performance-based fees. Therefore, if we fail to achieve our performance target for a particular period, we will not earn a performance-based fee for that period and, for accounts with a high-watermark provision, our ability to earn future performance-based fees will be impaired. We are eligible to earn performance-based fees on 6.0%, 8.5% and 0.8% of the assets we manage for institutional clients, private wealth clients and retail clients, respectively (in total, 4.4% of our AUM).
Our investment advisory and services fees increased by $123.4 million, or 5.0%, in 2020, due to a $90.4 million, or 3.8%, increase in base fees and a $33.0 million increase in performance-based fees. The increase in base fees is primarily due to an 7.9% increase in average AUM, partially offset by a lower portfolio fee rate. Our investment advisory and services fees increased by $109.8 million, or 4.6%, in 2019, due to a $128.4 million, or 5.7%, increase in base fees, which primarily resulted from a 5.5% increase in average AUM and the impact of a slight shift in product mix from fixed income to equities, which generally have higher fees. This increase was partially offset by an $18.5 million decrease in performance-based fees.
Institutional investment advisory and services fees increased $32.8 million, or 6.9%, in 2020, due to an increase in performance-based fees of $25.5 million and an increase in base fees of $7.3 million, or 1.6%. The increase in base fees is primarily due to an 7.7% increase in average AUM, partially offset by a lower portfolio fee rate. Institutional investment advisory and services fees increased $1.2 million, or 0.2%, in 2019, due to an increase in base fees of $6.2 million, or 1.4%, partially offset by a decrease in performance-based fees of $5.0 million. The increase in base fees was primarily due to a 2.8% increase in average AUM, partially offset by the impact of lower fee realization from active equities.
Retail investment advisory and services fees increased $112.0 million, or 10.2%, in 2020, due to an increase in base fees of $110.1 million, or 10.2%, and a $1.9 million increase in performance-based fees. The increase in base fees is primarily due to a 11.4% increase in average AUM, partially offset by a lower portfolio fee rate. Retail investment advisory and services fees increased $88.7 million, or 8.8%, in 2019, due to an increase in base fees of $84.5 million, or 8.5%, and a $4.2 million increase in base fees. The increase in base fees was primarily due to a 10.7% increase in average AUM, partially offset by the impact of lower fee realization from active equities.
Private Wealth Management investment advisory and services fees decreased by $21.4 million, or 2.4%, in 2020, due to a decrease in base fees of $27.0 million, or 3.2%, partially offset by a $5.6 million increase in performance-based fees. The decrease in base fees is primarily due to the impact of a lower portfolio fee rate, as well as a product mix shift with high fee value equity strategies now representing a lower percentage of our total AUM than in prior periods. Private Wealth Management investment advisory and services fees increased $20.0 million, or 2.3%, in 2019, due to an increase in base fees of $37.7 million, or 4.7%, partially offset by a decrease in performance-based fees of $17.7 million. The increase in base fees was primarily due to a 2.3% increase in average AUM and the impact of a shift in product mix to alternatives, which generally have higher fees.
Bernstein Research Services
We earn revenues for providing investment research to, and executing brokerage transactions for, institutional clients. These clients compensate us principally by directing us to execute brokerage transactions on their behalf, for which we earn commissions, and to a lesser extent, but increasingly, by paying us directly for research through commission sharing agreements or cash payments.
Revenues from Bernstein Research Services increased $51.8 million, or 12.7%, in 2020. The increase was due to higher market volatility in 2020, particularly between March and June 2020, primarily as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which led to
54
Table of Contents
higher customer activity and greater global trading volumes. We expect customer activity and trading volumes to gradually decrease in 2021 and to normalize in 2022, as the volatility surrounding COVID-19 begins to decline. Any decreases in customer activity and trading volumes will have a corresponding effect on Bernstein Research services revenue. Furthermore, all of 2020 reflects the inclusion of revenues from our acquisition of Autonomous (which closed on April 1, 2019).
Revenues from Bernstein Research Services decreased $31.5 million, or 7.2%, in 2019. The decrease was due to lower global customer activity and trading commissions, partially offset by the inclusion of revenues from our acquisition of Autonomous (which closed on April 1, 2019).
Distribution Revenues
Two of our subsidiaries act as distributors and/or placement agents of company-sponsored mutual funds and receive distribution services fees from certain of those funds as partial reimbursement of the distribution expenses they incur. Period-over-period fluctuations of distribution revenues typically are in line with fluctuations of the corresponding average AUM of these mutual funds.
Distribution revenues increased $74.7 million, or 16.4%, in 2020, primarily due to the corresponding average AUM of these mutual funds increasing 13.2%. Distribution revenues increased $36.5 million, or 8.7%, in 2019, primarily due to the corresponding average AUM of these mutual funds increasing 10.0%, offset by the impact of a shift in product mix from mutual funds that have higher distribution rates to mutual funds with lower distribution rates.
Dividend and Interest Income and Interest Expense
Dividend and interest income consists primarily of investment income and interest earned on customer margin balances and U.S. Treasury Bills as well as dividend and interest income in our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds. Interest expense principally reflects interest accrued on cash balances in customers’ brokerage accounts.
Dividend and interest income decreased $53.5 million, or 51.2%, in 2020, primarily due to lower interest earned on customer margin balances and U.S. Treasury Bills, as well as lower dividend and interest income in our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds. Interest expense decreased $41.6 million, or 72.6%, in 2020, due to lower interest paid on cash balances in customers' brokerage accounts.
Dividend and interest income increased $6.2 million, or 6.3%, in 2019, primarily due to higher interest earned on customer margin balances and U.S. Treasury Bills, offset by lower dividend and interest income in our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds. Interest expense increased $4.8 million, or 9.2%, in 2019, due to higher interest paid on cash balances in customers' brokerage accounts.
Investment Gains (Losses)
Investment gains (losses) consist primarily of realized and unrealized investment gains or losses on: (i) employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments, (ii) U.S. Treasury Bills, (iii) market-making in exchange-traded options and equities, (iv) seed capital investments, (v) derivatives and (vi) investments in our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds. Investment gains (losses) also include equity in earnings of proprietary investments in limited partnership hedge funds that we sponsor and manage.
55
Table of Contents
Investment gains (losses) are as follows:
Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands)
Long-term incentive compensation-related investments:
Investments held by consolidated company-sponsored investment funds:
Seed capital investments:
Realized gains (losses)
Unrealized (losses) gains
Brokerage-related investments:
Other Revenues
Other revenues consist of fees earned for transfer agency services provided to company-sponsored mutual funds, fees earned for administration and recordkeeping services provided to company-sponsored mutual funds and the general accounts of EQH and its subsidiaries, and other miscellaneous revenues. Other revenues increased $7.1 million, or 7.3%, in 2020, primarily due to higher shareholder servicing fees, higher brokerage income and higher mutual fund reimbursements, partially offset by lower investment income related to our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds. Other revenues decreased $1.1 million, or 1.1%, in 2019, primarily due to lower brokerage income and lower investment income related to our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds, partially offset by higher shareholder servicing fees.
56
Table of Contents
Expenses
The components of expenses are as follows:
Years Ended December 31, % Change
(in thousands)
Promotion and servicing:
General and administrative:
Employee Compensation and Benefits
Employee compensation and benefits consist of base compensation (including salaries and severance), annual short-term incentive compensation awards (cash bonuses), annual long-term incentive compensation awards, commissions, fringe benefits and other employment costs (including recruitment, training, temporary help and meals).
Compensation expense as a percentage of net revenues was 40.3%, 41.0% and 40.9% for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Compensation expense generally is determined on a discretionary basis and is primarily a function of our firm’s current-year financial performance. The amounts of incentive compensation we award are designed to motivate, reward and retain top talent while aligning our executives' interests with the interests of our Unitholders. Senior management, with the approval of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of AllianceBernstein Corporation (“Compensation Committee”), periodically confirms that the appropriate metric to consider in determining the amount of incentive compensation is the ratio of adjusted employee compensation and benefits expense to adjusted net revenues. Adjusted net revenues used in the adjusted compensation ratio are the same as the adjusted net revenues presented as a non-GAAP measure (discussed earlier in this Item 7). Adjusted employee compensation and benefits expense is total employee compensation and benefits expense minus other employment costs such as recruitment, training, temporary help and meals (which were 0.9%, 1.2% and 1.1% of adjusted net revenues for 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively), and excludes the impact of mark-to-market vesting expense, as well as dividends and interest expense, associated with employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments and the amortization expense associated with the awards issued by EQH to our firm's CEO relating to his role as a member of the EQH Management Committee. Senior management, with the approval of the Compensation Committee, has established as an objective that adjusted employee compensation and benefits expense generally should not exceed 50% of our adjusted net revenues, except in unexpected or unusual circumstances. Our ratios of adjusted compensation expense as a percentage of adjusted net revenues were 47.9%, 47.9% and 47.5%, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
In 2020, employee compensation and benefits expense increased $51.4 million, or 3.6%, primarily due to higher incentive compensation of $58.8 million and higher base compensation of $13.5 million (primarily higher base salaries), offset by lower fringes of $8.5 million, lower commissions of $6.2 million and lower other employment costs of $6.2 million. In 2019, employee compensation and benefits expense increased $64.0 million, or 4.6%, primarily due to higher base compensation of $34.1 million (primarily higher salaries), higher incentive compensation of $17.4 million and higher fringes of $15.6 million, partially offset by lower commissions of $3.2 million.
57
Table of Contents
Promotion and Servicing
Promotion and servicing expenses include distribution-related payments to financial intermediaries for distribution of AB mutual funds and amortization of deferred sales commissions paid to financial intermediaries for the sale of back-end load shares of AB mutual funds. Also included in this expense category are costs related to travel and entertainment, advertising and promotional materials.
Promotion and servicing expenses increased $63.6 million, or 8.8%, in 2020. The increase primarily was due to higher distribution-related payments of $81.3 million, higher amortization of deferred sales commissions of $12.3 million, higher trade execution and clearance expenses of $7.9 million and higher transfer fees of $4.8 million, offset by lower travel and entertainment expenses of $34.3 million and lower marketing expenses of $8.4 million. The decrease in travel and entertainment and marketing expense is primarily a result of cost savings associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and we expect these costs to increase in 2021 and further normalize in 2022, as the pandemic recedes. Promotion and servicing expenses increased $51.7 million, or 7.7%, in 2019. The increase primarily was due to higher distribution-related payments of $60.8 million and higher travel and entertainment expenses of $3.2 million, offset by lower amortization of deferred sales commissions of $6.3 million, lower trade execution and clearance expenses of $3.7 million and lower marketing expenses of $2.5 million.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses include portfolio services expenses, technology expenses, professional fees and office-related expenses (occupancy, communications and similar expenses). General and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues were 13.2% (13.1% excluding real estate charges), 13.9% (13.8% excluding real estate charges) and 13.5% (13.3% excluding real estate charges) for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. General and administrative expenses increased $3.0 million, or 0.6%, during 2020, primarily due to higher technology fees of $4.7 million, higher charitable contributions of $3.9 million, higher portfolio service fees of $3.6 million, higher real estate charges of $2.2 million and higher other taxes of $1.6 million, partially offset by lower professional fees of $9.1 million and lower office-related expenses of $3.5 million. General and administrative expenses increased $31.9 million, or 7.0%, during 2019, primarily due to higher portfolio service fees of $11.2 million, higher technology fees of $11.0 million and higher professional fees of $7.0 million.
Contingent Payment Arrangements
Contingent payment arrangements reflect changes in estimates of contingent payment liabilities associated with acquisitions in previous periods, as well as accretion expense of these liabilities. The expense of $1.9 million for 2020 reflects accretion expense of $3.3 million, offset by the change in estimate of the contingent consideration payable relating to our 2016 acquisition of $1.4 million. The credit of $0.5 million for 2019 reflects the change in estimate of the contingent consideration payable relating to our 2016 acquisition of $3.1 million, offset by accretion expenses of $2.6 million. The credit of $2.2 million for 2018 reflects the change in estimate of the contingent consideration payable relating to our 2016 acquisition of $2.4 million, offset by accretion expenses of $0.2 million.
Interest on Borrowings
Interest expense decreased 52.6% in 2020, reflecting lower interest rates partially offset by higher weighted average borrowings. Average daily borrowings for both the EQH facility and commercial paper were $554.0 million at a weighted average interest rate of 0.5% during 2020 compared to $436.9 million and 2.5% during 2019. Interest expense increased 25.8% in 2019, reflecting both higher weighted average borrowings and interest rates. Average daily borrowings for both the EQH facility and commercial paper were $436.9 million at a weighted average interest rate of 2.5% during 2019 compared to $350.3 million and 2.0% for commercial paper during 2018.
Income Taxes
AB, a private limited partnership, is not subject to federal or state corporate income taxes. However, AB is subject to a 4.0% New York City unincorporated business tax (“UBT”). Our domestic corporate subsidiaries are subject to federal, state and local income taxes, and generally are included in the filing of a consolidated federal income tax return. Separate state and local income tax returns also are filed. Foreign corporate subsidiaries generally are subject to taxes in the jurisdictions where they are located.
Income tax expense increased $3.9 million, or 9.3%, in 2020 compared to 2019. This increase is due to higher pre-tax book income, offset by a slightly lower effective tax rate in 2020 of 5.0% compared to 5.1% in 2019. The decrease in our effective tax rate was driven by a reduction of one-time discrete items.
58
Table of Contents
Income tax expense decreased $4.1 million, or 8.9%, in 2019 compared to 2018. This decrease is due to a lower effective tax rate in 2019 of 5.1% compared to 5.6% in 2018. The decrease in our effective tax rate was driven by a more favorable mix of earnings across the AB tax filing groups and a reduction of one-time discrete items.
Net Income (Loss) of Consolidated Entities Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests
Net income (loss) of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests primarily consists of limited partner interests owned by other investors in our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds. In 2020, we had $4.2 million of net losses of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests, primarily due to losses on investments held by our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds. In 2019 and 2018, we had $29.6 million and $21.9 million, respectively, of net gains of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests, primarily due to gains on investments held by our consolidated company-sponsored investment funds. Fluctuations period-to-period result primarily from the number of consolidated company-sponsored investment funds and their respective market performance.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Cash flows from operating activities primarily include the receipt of investment advisory and services fees and other revenues offset by the payment of operating expenses incurred in the normal course of business. Our cash flows from operating activities have historically been positive and sufficient in supporting our operations. We do not anticipate this to change in the foreseeable future. Cash flows from investing activities generally consist of small capital expenditures and, when applicable, business acquisitions. Cash flows from financing activities primarily consist of issuance and repayment of debt and the repurchase of AB Holding units to fund our long-term deferred compensation plans. We are required to distribute all of our Available Cash Flow to our Unitholders and the General Partner.