EQT vs PR
EQT Corp (EQT) and Permian Resources Corp (PR) are both filed with the SEC under Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas. EQT is 1.8× PR's size by market cap ($34.3B against $19.4B); PR trades at the higher fiscal-year P/E (18.1× against 16.5×); EQT reports the higher net margin (23.6% against 18.5%); PR grew sales faster over three years (+33.5% against +4.9%); and over the past year PR returned +63.3% against EQT's +5.4%.
| EQT | PR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $54.57 | $22.70 |
| Market cap | $34.3B | $19.4B |
| P/E (FY) | 16.5× | 18.1× |
| P/S | 4.0× | 3.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.2× | — |
| Operating margin | 37.6% | 28.9% |
| Net margin | 23.6% | 18.5% |
| Return on equity | 9.2% | 9.6% |
| Sales growth (3y) | +4.9% | +33.5% |
| EPS growth (3y) | -8.9% | -7.4% |
| Dividend yield | 1.1% | 2.3% |
| 1-year return | +5.4% | +63.3% |
Screener snapshot — prices as of 2026-08-28. Each side's last close is the most recent session the snapshot holds for that company, which can be an earlier one, and its 1-year return is measured to that close. Market caps struck on 2026-08-27. Last close, market cap and the 1-year return are price figures; every other row is computed over the company's latest filed fiscal year — FY2025 (ended 2025-12-31) for both. — not published for this company. A ratio goes unpublished for more than one reason: a component the calculation needs is not on file, the filing does not tag the line it is read from, or the calculation is not defined on the filed basis — EV/EBITDA is not printed on non-positive EBITDA, and return on equity is not computed on a zero or negative equity base.
Who holds them, and who has traded them
| EQT | PR | |
|---|---|---|
| Institutional holders (13F) | 1,157 | 613 |
| Insider buyers − sellers (180d) | -5 | -5 |
| Congressional trades disclosed (180d) | 3 | 0 |
| Executive-branch officials on file — trades disclosed (180d) | 6 | 1 |
Counts only. The congressional figures count transactions dated in the trailing 180 days and disclosed in STOCK Act periodic transaction reports; amounts are filed as ranges and are never summed. The executive-branch figures count the same window of transactions, and they are scoped to one roster. The officials OGE posts for direct download. Insider buyers − sellers counts distinct people filing open-market Form 4 purchases minus distinct people filing open-market sales over the trailing 180 days, capped at ±5.
EQT vs PR: common questions
- Is EQT bigger than PR?
- EQT carries the larger market cap — $34.3B against $19.4B, both struck on 2026-08-27.
- Which trades at a higher P/E, EQT or PR?
- PR, at a fiscal-year 18.1× against 16.5× for EQT. Both are price ÷ latest full-year diluted earnings per share, not a trailing-twelve-month P/E.
- How have EQT and PR performed over the past year?
- PR returned +63.3% and EQT +5.4%, measured on the trailing calendar year to the last close.
- How many institutions hold EQT and PR?
- 1,157 13F filers report a position in EQT and 613 in PR, on the latest quarter in the panel.
- Are EQT and PR in the same industry?
- Both are filed with the SEC under Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas, which is the classification this pairing is built on.
EQT overview → · PR overview → · EQT institutional ownership → · PR institutional ownership → · Congress and EQT → · Executive branch and EQT → · Executive branch and PR →
More in Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas: EOG vs EQT · EOG vs EXE · EOG vs FANG · EOG vs OVV
Stock comparisons lists every pair this site publishes.
Source: SPZCO — https://spzco.com/vs/eqt-vs-pr