ECL vs PG
Ecolab Inc. (ECL) and PROCTER & GAMBLE Co (PG) are both filed with the SEC under Soap, Detergents, Cleang Preparations, Perfumes, Cosmetics. PG is 4.2× ECL's size by market cap ($332.7B against $80.1B); ECL trades at the higher fiscal-year P/E (39.3× against 22.0×); PG reports the higher net margin (19.0% against 12.5%); ECL grew sales faster over three years (+4.3% against +1.7%); and over the past year ECL returned +3.9% against PG's -5.6%.
| ECL | PG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $286.75 | $143.78 |
| Market cap | $80.1B | $332.7B |
| P/E (FY) | 39.3× | 22.0× |
| P/S | 4.8× | 3.9× |
| Operating margin | 16.4% | 24.3% |
| Net margin | 12.5% | 19.0% |
| Return on equity | 22.4% | — |
| Sales growth (3y) | +4.3% | +1.7% |
| EPS growth (3y) | +24.1% | +3.9% |
| Dividend yield | 0.9% | 3.0% |
| 1-year return | +3.9% | -5.6% |
Screener snapshot — prices as of 2026-08-28. Each side's last close is the most recent session the snapshot holds for that company, which can be an earlier one, and its 1-year return is measured to that close. Market caps struck on 2026-08-27. Last close, market cap and the 1-year return are price figures; every other row is computed over the company's latest filed fiscal year, and the two differ: ECL FY2025 (ended 2025-12-31); PG FY2025 (ended 2025-06-30). — not published for this company. A ratio goes unpublished for more than one reason: a component the calculation needs is not on file, the filing does not tag the line it is read from, or the calculation is not defined on the filed basis — EV/EBITDA is not printed on non-positive EBITDA, and return on equity is not computed on a zero or negative equity base.
Who holds them, and who has traded them
| ECL | PG | |
|---|---|---|
| Institutional holders (13F) | 1,681 | 3,956 |
| Insider buyers − sellers (180d) | +1 | — |
| Congressional trades disclosed (180d) | 1 | 8 |
| Executive-branch officials on file — trades disclosed (180d) | 12 | 20 |
Counts only. The congressional figures count transactions dated in the trailing 180 days and disclosed in STOCK Act periodic transaction reports; amounts are filed as ranges and are never summed. The executive-branch figures count the same window of transactions, and they are scoped to one roster. The officials OGE posts for direct download. Insider buyers − sellers counts distinct people filing open-market Form 4 purchases minus distinct people filing open-market sales over the trailing 180 days, capped at ±5. — no open-market Form 4 purchases or sales in the window.
ECL vs PG: common questions
- Is ECL bigger than PG?
- PG carries the larger market cap — $332.7B against $80.1B, both struck on 2026-08-27.
- Which trades at a higher P/E, ECL or PG?
- ECL, at a fiscal-year 39.3× against 22.0× for PG. Both are price ÷ latest full-year diluted earnings per share, not a trailing-twelve-month P/E.
- How have ECL and PG performed over the past year?
- ECL returned +3.9% and PG -5.6%, measured on the trailing calendar year to the last close.
- How many institutions hold ECL and PG?
- 1,681 13F filers report a position in ECL and 3,956 in PG, on the latest quarter in the panel.
- Are ECL and PG in the same industry?
- Both are filed with the SEC under Soap, Detergents, Cleang Preparations, Perfumes, Cosmetics, which is the classification this pairing is built on.
ECL overview → · PG overview → · ECL institutional ownership → · PG institutional ownership → · Congress and ECL → · Congress and PG → · Executive branch and ECL → · Executive branch and PG →
More in Soap, Detergents, Cleang Preparations, Perfumes, Cosmetics: CHD vs ECL · CHD vs PG
Stock comparisons lists every pair this site publishes.
Source: SPZCO — https://spzco.com/vs/ecl-vs-pg