CACI vs GDDY
Caci International Inc /de/ (CACI) and GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY) are both filed with the SEC under Services-Computer Integrated Systems Design. CACI is 1.1× GDDY's size by market cap ($14.0B against $12.3B); CACI trades at the higher fiscal-year P/E (28.4× against 15.6×); GDDY reports the higher net margin (17.7% against 5.8%); CACI grew sales faster over three years (+11.6% against +6.6%); and over the past year CACI returned +31.0% against GDDY's -33.9%.
| CACI | GDDY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $628.20 | $97.70 |
| Market cap | $14.0B | $12.3B |
| P/E (FY) | 28.4× | 15.6× |
| P/S | 1.6× | 2.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 19.5× | — |
| Operating margin | 8.9% | 22.8% |
| Net margin | 5.8% | 17.7% |
| Return on equity | — | 192.9% |
| Sales growth (3y) | +11.6% | +6.6% |
| EPS growth (3y) | +12.9% | — |
| 1-year return | +31.0% | -33.9% |
Screener snapshot — prices as of 2026-08-28. Each side's last close is the most recent session the snapshot holds for that company, which can be an earlier one, and its 1-year return is measured to that close. Market caps struck on 2026-08-27. Last close, market cap and the 1-year return are price figures; every other row is computed over the company's latest filed fiscal year, and the two differ: CACI FY2025 (ended 2025-06-30); GDDY FY2025 (ended 2025-12-31). A return on equity past ±100% — GDDY at 192.9% — divides earnings by an average filed equity base smaller in magnitude than the earnings themselves; the two columns are not on one scale. — not published for this company. A ratio goes unpublished for more than one reason: a component the calculation needs is not on file, the filing does not tag the line it is read from, or the calculation is not defined on the filed basis — EV/EBITDA is not printed on non-positive EBITDA, and return on equity is not computed on a zero or negative equity base.
Who holds them, and who has traded them
| CACI | GDDY | |
|---|---|---|
| Institutional holders (13F) | 661 | 613 |
| Insider buyers − sellers (180d) | -2 | -5 |
| Congressional trades disclosed (180d) | 0 | 4 |
| Executive-branch officials on file — trades disclosed (180d) | 0 | 10 |
Counts only. The congressional figures count transactions dated in the trailing 180 days and disclosed in STOCK Act periodic transaction reports; amounts are filed as ranges and are never summed. The executive-branch figures count the same window of transactions, and they are scoped to one roster. The officials OGE posts for direct download. Insider buyers − sellers counts distinct people filing open-market Form 4 purchases minus distinct people filing open-market sales over the trailing 180 days, capped at ±5.
CACI vs GDDY: common questions
- Is CACI bigger than GDDY?
- CACI carries the larger market cap — $14.0B against $12.3B, both struck on 2026-08-27.
- Which trades at a higher P/E, CACI or GDDY?
- CACI, at a fiscal-year 28.4× against 15.6× for GDDY. Both are price ÷ latest full-year diluted earnings per share, not a trailing-twelve-month P/E.
- How have CACI and GDDY performed over the past year?
- CACI returned +31.0% and GDDY -33.9%, measured on the trailing calendar year to the last close.
- How many institutions hold CACI and GDDY?
- 661 13F filers report a position in CACI and 613 in GDDY, on the latest quarter in the panel.
- Are CACI and GDDY in the same industry?
- Both are filed with the SEC under Services-Computer Integrated Systems Design, which is the classification this pairing is built on.
CACI overview → · GDDY overview → · CACI institutional ownership → · GDDY institutional ownership → · Congress and GDDY → · Executive branch and GDDY →
More in Services-Computer Integrated Systems Design: CACI vs JKHY · CACI vs LDOS · GDDY vs JKHY · GDDY vs LDOS
Stock comparisons lists every pair this site publishes.
Source: SPZCO — https://spzco.com/vs/caci-vs-gddy