BSX vs MMM
Boston Scientific Corp (BSX) and 3M Co (MMM) are both filed with the SEC under Surgical & Medical Instruments & Apparatus. MMM is 1.4× BSX's size by market cap ($92.2B against $67.6B); MMM trades at the higher fiscal-year P/E (29.8× against 24.1×); BSX reports the higher net margin (14.4% against 13.0%); BSX grew sales faster over three years (+16.5% against -1.6%); and over the past year MMM returned +12.2% against BSX's -55.7%.
| BSX | MMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $46.84 | $174.34 |
| Market cap | $67.6B | $92.2B |
| P/E (FY) | 24.1× | 29.8× |
| P/S | 3.4× | 3.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.5× | — |
| Gross margin | 69.0% | — |
| Operating margin | 18.0% | 18.6% |
| Net margin | 14.4% | 13.0% |
| Return on equity | 12.6% | 76.1% |
| Sales growth (3y) | +16.5% | -1.6% |
| EPS growth (3y) | +62.8% | -16.2% |
| Dividend yield | 0.0% | 1.7% |
| 1-year return | -55.7% | +12.2% |
Screener snapshot — prices as of 2026-08-28. Each side's last close is the most recent session the snapshot holds for that company, which can be an earlier one, and its 1-year return is measured to that close. Market caps struck on 2026-08-27. Last close, market cap and the 1-year return are price figures; every other row is computed over the company's latest filed fiscal year — FY2025 (ended 2025-12-31) for both. — not published for this company. A ratio goes unpublished for more than one reason: a component the calculation needs is not on file, the filing does not tag the line it is read from, or the calculation is not defined on the filed basis — EV/EBITDA is not printed on non-positive EBITDA, and return on equity is not computed on a zero or negative equity base.
Who holds them, and who has traded them
| BSX | MMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Institutional holders (13F) | 1,658 | 2,145 |
| Insider buyers − sellers (180d) | +3 | — |
| Congressional trades disclosed (180d) | 7 | 3 |
| Executive-branch officials on file — trades disclosed (180d) | 18 | 5 |
Counts only. The congressional figures count transactions dated in the trailing 180 days and disclosed in STOCK Act periodic transaction reports; amounts are filed as ranges and are never summed. The executive-branch figures count the same window of transactions, and they are scoped to one roster. The officials OGE posts for direct download. Insider buyers − sellers counts distinct people filing open-market Form 4 purchases minus distinct people filing open-market sales over the trailing 180 days, capped at ±5. — no open-market Form 4 purchases or sales in the window.
BSX vs MMM: common questions
- Is BSX bigger than MMM?
- MMM carries the larger market cap — $92.2B against $67.6B, both struck on 2026-08-27.
- Which trades at a higher P/E, BSX or MMM?
- MMM, at a fiscal-year 29.8× against 24.1× for BSX. Both are price ÷ latest full-year diluted earnings per share, not a trailing-twelve-month P/E.
- How have BSX and MMM performed over the past year?
- MMM returned +12.2% and BSX -55.7%, measured on the trailing calendar year to the last close.
- How many institutions hold BSX and MMM?
- 1,658 13F filers report a position in BSX and 2,145 in MMM, on the latest quarter in the panel.
- Are BSX and MMM in the same industry?
- Both are filed with the SEC under Surgical & Medical Instruments & Apparatus, which is the classification this pairing is built on.
BSX overview → · MMM overview → · BSX institutional ownership → · MMM institutional ownership → · Congress and BSX → · Congress and MMM → · Executive branch and BSX → · Executive branch and MMM →
More in Surgical & Medical Instruments & Apparatus: BDX vs BSX · BDX vs DXCM · BDX vs MMM · BDX vs RMD
Stock comparisons lists every pair this site publishes.
Source: SPZCO — https://spzco.com/vs/bsx-vs-mmm