ARMK vs YUM
Aramark (ARMK) and Yum Brands Inc (YUM) are both filed with the SEC under Retail-Eating Places. YUM is 2.7× ARMK's size by market cap ($41.1B against $15.5B); ARMK trades at the higher fiscal-year P/E (48.3× against 27.2×); YUM reports the higher net margin (19.0% against 1.8%); ARMK grew sales faster over three years (+10.6% against +6.3%); and over the past year ARMK returned +49.5% against YUM's +7.8%.
| ARMK | YUM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last close | $58.18 | $153.86 |
| Market cap | $15.5B | $41.1B |
| P/E (FY) | 48.3× | 27.2× |
| P/S | 0.8× | 5.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.0× | 18.8× |
| Operating margin | 4.3% | 31.3% |
| Net margin | 1.8% | 19.0% |
| Return on equity | 10.6% | — |
| Sales growth (3y) | +10.6% | +6.3% |
| EPS growth (3y) | +17.6% | +6.7% |
| Dividend yield | 0.7% | 1.9% |
| 1-year return | +49.5% | +7.8% |
Screener snapshot — prices as of 2026-08-28. Each side's last close is the most recent session the snapshot holds for that company, which can be an earlier one, and its 1-year return is measured to that close. Market caps struck on 2026-08-27. Last close, market cap and the 1-year return are price figures; every other row is computed over the company's latest filed fiscal year, and the two differ: ARMK FY2025 (ended 2025-10-03); YUM FY2025 (ended 2025-12-31). — not published for this company. A ratio goes unpublished for more than one reason: a component the calculation needs is not on file, the filing does not tag the line it is read from, or the calculation is not defined on the filed basis — EV/EBITDA is not printed on non-positive EBITDA, and return on equity is not computed on a zero or negative equity base.
Who holds them, and who has traded them
| ARMK | YUM | |
|---|---|---|
| Institutional holders (13F) | 465 | 1,427 |
| Insider buyers − sellers (180d) | -1 | -5 |
| Congressional trades disclosed (180d) | 0 | 1 |
| Executive-branch officials on file — trades disclosed (180d) | 0 | 6 |
Counts only. The congressional figures count transactions dated in the trailing 180 days and disclosed in STOCK Act periodic transaction reports; amounts are filed as ranges and are never summed. The executive-branch figures count the same window of transactions, and they are scoped to one roster. The officials OGE posts for direct download. Insider buyers − sellers counts distinct people filing open-market Form 4 purchases minus distinct people filing open-market sales over the trailing 180 days, capped at ±5.
ARMK vs YUM: common questions
- Is ARMK bigger than YUM?
- YUM carries the larger market cap — $41.1B against $15.5B, both struck on 2026-08-27.
- Which trades at a higher P/E, ARMK or YUM?
- ARMK, at a fiscal-year 48.3× against 27.2× for YUM. Both are price ÷ latest full-year diluted earnings per share, not a trailing-twelve-month P/E.
- How have ARMK and YUM performed over the past year?
- ARMK returned +49.5% and YUM +7.8%, measured on the trailing calendar year to the last close.
- How many institutions hold ARMK and YUM?
- 465 13F filers report a position in ARMK and 1,427 in YUM, on the latest quarter in the panel.
- Are ARMK and YUM in the same industry?
- Both are filed with the SEC under Retail-Eating Places, which is the classification this pairing is built on.
ARMK overview → · YUM overview → · ARMK institutional ownership → · YUM institutional ownership → · Congress and YUM → · Executive branch and YUM →
More in Retail-Eating Places: ARMK vs CMG · ARMK vs DRI · ARMK vs MCD · ARMK vs QSR
Stock comparisons lists every pair this site publishes.
Source: SPZCO — https://spzco.com/vs/armk-vs-yum