Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

SolarWindow Technologies, Inc. WNDW US Equity

Materials · CIK 1071840 · FY ends Aug 31
$1.31
-0.53 (-28.80%)
USD · as of 2026-08-28 · marketstack

SolarWindow Technologies, Inc. (OTC: WNDW), an SEC filer in Industrial Organic Chemicals, closed at $1.31, -28.8%, on 2026-08-28, with a market cap of $86M and a return on equity of -40.6%. Institutional ownership, earnings history and filed financials are on the tabs below.

WNDW · 10-K · period ended 2021-08-31

← all WNDW documents
filed 2021-11-04 · EDGAR original ↗

Our rendering of the filing — original pagination and typography are not reproduced, and tables are reduced to their short label cells (the figures live on FA). Nothing is summarized: every line below is the filing's own text.

blocks 1,2051,804 of 2,647228k characters rendered

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis

of Financial condition and results of operations

The following Management’s Discussion and

Analysis (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand the results of operations and financial condition of SolarWindow

Technologies, Inc. The MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with financial statements and the accompanying

notes to the financial statements included in this Form 10-K.

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition

and results of operations is based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally

accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that

affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management

bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances,

the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent

from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Overview

We are a developer of transparent electricity-generating

coatings, and methods for their application to various materials (collectively, “LiquidElectricityTM Coatings”).

When applied in ultra-thin layers to rigid glass, and flexible glass and plastic surfaces our LiquidElectricityTM Coatings transform

otherwise ordinary surfaces into photovoltaic devices capable of generating electricity from natural sun, artificial light, and low, shaded,

or reflected light conditions while maintaining transparency.

We have overcome major technical challenges and achieved

many important milestones resulting in an expansion of the potential applications of LiquidElectricityTM Coatings which span multiple

industries, including architectural, automotive, agrivoltaic, aerospace, commercial transportation and marine. Our LiquidElectricityTM

Coatings are under development with support from commercial contract firms and at the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Renewable

Energy Laboratory, through Cooperative Research and Development Agreements.

Research and Related Agreements

We are a party to certain agreements related to the

development of our technology.

Stevenson-Wydler Cooperative Research and Development Agreement with

the Alliance for Sustainable Energy

On March 18, 2011, we entered into the NREL CRADA

with Alliance for Sustainable Energy, the operator of the NREL under its U.S. Department of Energy contract to advance the commercial

development of our technology. Under terms of the NREL CRADA, NREL researchers make use of our exclusive intellectual property (“IP”),

newly developed IP, and NREL’s background IP in order to work towards specific product development goals, established by the Company.

Under the terms of the NREL CRADA, we agreed to reimburse Alliance for Sustainable Energy for filing fees associated with all documented,

out-of-pocket costs directly related to patent application preparation and filings, and maintenance of the patent applications.

On March 6, 2013, we entered into Phase II of our

NREL CRADA. Under the terms of the agreement, researchers will additionally work towards:

· further improving our technology efficiency and transparency;

· optimizing electrical power (current and voltage) output;

· optimizing LiquidElectricityTM Coating performance on flexible substrates; and

29

On December 28, 2015, we entered into another modification

to the NREL CRADA (the “Modification”). Under the Modification, (i) the date of completion was extended to December

2017; and (ii) the Company and the NREL will work jointly towards achieving specific product development goals and objectives for the

purpose of preparing to commercialize our OPV-based transparent electricity-generating coatings for various applications, including BIPV,

glass and flexible plastics.

Over the course of our collaborative research and

development efforts with the NREL under the CRADA, both parties have agreed to modifications to extend the date of completion. The Company

and NREL have entered into nine such No Cost Time Extensions (“NCTE”). Under the terms of each NCTE, all terms and

conditions of the NREL CRADA remain in full force and effect without change. The current NCTE was executed on September 15, 2020 and extends

the date of completion to December 31, 2021. As of August 31, 2021, the Company had a capitalized asset balance of $122,332 related to

deferred research and development costs for advances to Alliance for Sustainable Energy for work to be performed under the NREL CRADA.

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable

Energy’s (EERE) Advanced Manufacturing Office (AMO) Cooperative Research and Development Agreement

On March 15, 2018 the Company was awarded it’s

first-ever AMM CRADA by the DOE EERE AMO. SolarWindow was awarded the AMM CRADA after submitting a proposal outlining its coating technologies

and fabrication methods to the DOE’s Roll-to-Roll Advanced Materials Manufacturing Consortium, led by ORNL and partnering with ANL,

LBNL, and NREL. The AMM CRADA was carried out with the DOE by SolarWindow, ANL, and NREL. Work under the AMM CRADA was completed in April

2021

Through the developments of AMM CRADA, the Company

accomplished initiatives to improve and optimize its laser patterning system and methods of fabrication for application of our electricity-generating

coatings on flexible plastics. Once optimized for industry, this advancement is expected to reduce process time, improve device performance,

and reduce the costs of LiquidElectricityTM Coating based plastic products. Another objective of the AMM CRADA was to develop and

demonstrate a unique high-throughput process methodology for semitransparent OPV modules compatible with high process speeds for many

different advanced material manufacturing systems.

Results of Operations

Year ended August 31, 2021 compared to the year ended August 31, 2020

A summary of our operating expenses for the years ended August 31, 2021

and 2020 follows:

Years Ended August 31, Increase / Percentage

Operating expenses:

30

Selling, General and Administrative

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”)

costs include all expenditures incurred other than research and development related costs, including costs related to personnel, professional

fees, travel and entertainment, public company costs, insurance and other office related costs. During the year ended August 31, 2021

compared to the year ended August 31, 2020, SG&A costs increased due primarily to inclusion of our South Korean operations and resulting

in a $302,440 increase in personnel costs, $247,952 increase in other administrative costs and $55,671 increase in professional costs.

Research and Product Development

Research and Development (“R&D”)

costs represent costs incurred to develop our SolarWindowTM technology and are incurred pursuant to our research agreements and agreements

with other third-party providers and certain internal R&D cost allocations. Payments under these agreements include salaries and benefits

for R&D personnel, allocated overhead, contract services and other costs. R&D costs are expensed when incurred, except for non-refundable

advance payments for future research and development activities which are capitalized and recognized as expense as the related services

are performed. During the year ended August 31, 2021 compared to the year ended August 31, 2020, R&D costs decreased primarily as

a result of a $124,266 decrease in personnel costs, $75,703 decrease in other R&D related costs offset by an $11,252 increase in CRADA

costs.

Stock Based Compensation

The Company grants stock options to its Directors,

employees and consultants. Stock compensation represents the expense associated with the amortization of our stock options. Expense associated

with equity-based transactions is calculated and expensed in our financial statements as required pursuant to various accounting rules

and is non-cash in nature. Stock based compensation expense primarily relates to 2,500,000 stock purchase options issued to each of Mr.

Jatinder S. Bhogal, CEO and Director and Mr. John Rhee, President and Director, pursuant to an Executive Consulting Agreement with each

entered into in our fiscal quarter ending August 31, 2020.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary cash needs are for personnel, professional

and R&D related fees and other administrative costs. Our principal sources of liquidity are cash and short-term investments. As of

August 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had cash and short-term investments of $12,127,456 and $14,151,523, respectively. We have financed

our operations primarily from the sale of equity and debt securities.

The following table presents a summary of our cash

flows for the periods indicated:

Years Ended August 31, 2021 compared

Operating Activities

Operating activities consist of net loss adjusted

for certain non-cash items, including depreciation, stock-based compensation expense, realized gains or losses on disposal of property

and equipment and the effect of working capital changes. Net cash used in operating activities increased 8.7% to $2,659,240 for the year

ended August 31, 2021 as compared to $2,447,457 for the year ended August 31, 2020 mainly due to a $385,000 reduction in cash used in

our US operations offset by a $597,000 increase in cash used in our Korea operations.

31

Investing Activities

We have used cash primarily for short-term investments,

investments in property and equipment, furniture, office equipment, leasehold improvements to our Korean offices and computers and software.

Net investment activities for capital expenditures were $76,338 during the year ended August 31, 2021, compared to $5,031 during the year

ended August 31, 2020. During 2021, we purchased a twelve-month term deposit in the amount of $5,000,000.

Financing Activities

Cash flows from financing activities totaled $724,872

as a result of the exercise of 201,600 Series S Warrants with a strike price of $3.42 per share and the exercise of 10,000 stock options

at a strike price of $3.54 per share.

Indebtedness

None.

Other Contractual Obligations

In September 2020, the Company, through its wholly owned direct and indirect

subsidiaries, SolarWindow Asia (USA) Corp. and SolarWindow Asia Co., Ltd., entered a lease for office space in South Korea. The office

lease expires on September 23, 2022. Monthly rent is approximately $1,200.

On February 26, 2021, SolarWindow Asia Co., Ltd. entered

into an apartment lease for the purposes of housing foreign personnel. The apartment lease expires on March 7, 2022. Monthly rent is approximately

$950.

During fiscal 2019 the Company made payments totaling

$1,292,655 towards the purchase of manufacturing equipment with an estimated total cost of $1,803,000. The remaining $510,345 will be

paid upon the completion of the equipment once the final specifications have been determined pending optimization of the Company’s

product iteration specific to this equipment. For additional information, see “Note 3 – Equipment” located in the footnotes

to our financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

There were no off-balance sheet arrangements for the

years ended August 31, 2021 and 2020.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

For more information regarding recent accounting standards

and their impact to our results of operations and financial position, see “Note 2- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”

to our Financial Statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition

and results of operations are based upon our Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally

accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates

and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and the related disclosure of contingent

assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates based on its historical experience and on various other assumptions

that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying

values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under

different assumptions or conditions.

We believe the following critical accounting policies

and estimates affect the preparation of our financial statements:

32

Stock Based Compensation

Pursuant to the provisions of the Financial Accounting

Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic No. 718-10, Compensation-Stock Compensation,

which establishes accounting for share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from employees and nonemployees, we

utilize the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of employee stock option awards at the date of grant, which

requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including expected volatility and expected life. Changes in these inputs and assumptions

can materially affect the measure of estimated fair value of our share-based compensation. These assumptions are subjective and generally

require significant analysis and judgment to develop. When estimating fair value, some of the assumptions will be based on, or determined

from, external data and other assumptions may be derived from our historical experience with stock-based payment arrangements. The appropriate

weight to place on historical experience is a matter of judgment, based on relevant facts and circumstances.

Related Party Transactions

For a discussion of our Related Party Transactions,

see “Note 7 - Transactions With Related Persons” to our Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report

on Form 10-K.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company does not carry any balances that are materially

exposed to market risk.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The report of the independent registered public accounting

firm and financial statements listed in the accompanying index are included in Item 15 of this report. See Index to the financial statements

on page F-1 of this Form 10-K.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING

AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures,

as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act, which are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be

disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time

periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our management

recognized that any system of controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance

of achieving the desired control objectives, as ours is designed to do, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment

in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. In addition, the design of any system of controls is

also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will

succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes

in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective

control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Under the supervision and with the participation of

management, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures for

the Company and its subsidiaries as of August 31, 2021. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial

officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of August 31, 2021.

33

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining

adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Our internal control over financial

reporting is a process designed under the supervision of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer to provide reasonable

assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external reporting purposes

in accordance with US GAAP. Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.

Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because

of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As of August 31, 2021, our management, including our

principal executive officer and principal financial officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting

using the criteria set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations

of the Treadway Commission (comm. only referred to as COSO). Based on this assessment, our management concluded that our internal control

over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria as of August 31, 2021.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes to the Company’s

internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2021, that

materially affected, or would be reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth the names and ages of

all of our directors and executive officers. We have a Board comprised of five members. Each director holds office until a successor is

duly elected or appointed. Executive officers serve at the discretion of the Board and are appointed by the Board. Also provided herein

are brief descriptions of the business experience of each of the directors and officers during the past five years, and an indication

of directorships held by each director in other companies subject to the reporting requirements under the Federal securities law.

Name Age Current Position With Us Director or Officer Since

Gary Parmar, CPA, CA, ICD.D 50 Director, Audit Committee Chair June 14, 2019

Bob Levine 72 Director December 7, 2018

Joseph Sierchio 72 Director and General Counsel October 1, 2020

34

Business Experience

Set forth below are the names of all of our directors

and executive officers, all positions and offices held by each person, the period during which each has served as such, and the principal

occupations and employment of such persons during at least the last five years, and other director positions held currently or during

the last five years:

Current Directors and Officers

Jatinder S. Bhogal. Mr. Jay (Jatinder) S. Bhogal

brings 20 years of experience helping finance and build companies in diversified industries, including: online media, health services,

medical devices, drug discovery, vaccine production, renewable and alternative energy, fossil fuels, and others. Numerous breakthrough

technologies supported by Mr. Bhogal have grown from inception to achieve $300 million-plus market capitalization. As a private investor,

director, and executive, Mr. Bhogal has incubated and directed ventures and projects in collaboration with leading research institutions

and government agencies, including: United States Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory, University of California

Berkeley, Dartmouth College, NASA’s International Space Station National Laboratory Initiative (on board the Space Shuttle ‘Endeavour’

with USDA; mission STS-126), and others. Mr. Bhogal serves as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman.

John Rhee. Mr. Rhee has more than 20 years

of experience helping businesses in a variety of industries in the areas of strategic financing, mergers and acquisitions and portfolio

management. Since 2013, Mr. Rhee has served as Chairman and Managing Director of Stratis Impact a Private Equity firm located in Hong

Kong. From 2009 to 2013, Mr. Rhee served the Korean Ministry of Culture as a Senior Adviser and from 2004 to 2010 in various roles including

Executive Director for Investment at Softbank. Mr. Rhee holds a J.D from Yale Law School and undergraduate degree from Cornell University.

Mr. Rhee serves as our President, Director and President and CEO of SolarWindow Asia Co. Ltd.

Justin Frere, CPA. Mr. Frere has served as

the Company’s Controller since August of 2011 and was appointed Secretary and Interim Chief Financial Officer on July 5, 2019 and

July 22, 2020, respectively. Mr. Frere has over 20 years of experience as a hands-on CFO/Controller level finance and administration professional

with extensive operational and analytical experience as a consultant, CFO and controller for numerous public entities. From 2001 through

present, Mr. Frere has been principal of Frontline Accounting performing CFO/controller, and financial analyst services for various public

and private domestic and international clients. Mr. Frere has been the primary party responsible for accounting, drafting and filing SEC

Forms and interacting with auditors and the SEC in support of public company reporting. Mr. Frere started his career at KPMG in their

assurance practice. Mr. Frere earned a Bachelors of Science in accounting and finance from California Polytechnic State University in

San Luis Obispo and MBA from San Diego State University.

Gary P. Parmar, CPA, CA, ICD.D Mr. Parmar is

MNP’s Private Enterprise Technology Media Telecommunications Regional Leader in Kelowna. A trusted advisor with more than two-and-a-half

decades of experience, Gary understands his clients’ unique challenges and delivers creative solutions to help them maximize their

wealth while keeping taxes to a minimum. He is committed to building and nurturing long-term relationships, helping his clients increase

profits, grow their operations and achieve their business goals. Mr. Parmar provides accounting, tax, financial planning and business

management advice to private enterprises and family-owned businesses. He works with a broad range of clients, including real estate developers,

builders, agricultural and cannabis producers, professionals and companies in the technology, media telecommunications industries. His

services include helping with tax planning related to incorporation, income management, succession planning, business management, the

purchase and sale of businesses and estate planning. Mr. Parmar also delivers an MNP employee benefit program that helps business owners

develop customized solutions to keep team members engaged and rewarded. Mr. Parmar helps his clients structure their businesses to facilitate

projects and transactions, assess the validity of deals and arrange financing. Mr. Parmar provides ongoing management consulting to help

with job costing, managing working capital and maximizing profitability. Mr. Parmar earned a Bachelor of Commerce (BComm) in accounting

from the University of Alberta in 1994. He is a Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA) qualifying as a Chartered Accountant (CA) in 1999.

35

Bob Levine. Mr. Levine has been with Avison

Young since 1994 and is one of the founding partners of the company which has 120 offices in 25 countries and 5,000 real estate professionals.

Since 2008, Avison Young has been one of the fastest growing commercial real estate companies in the world. Having retired from the Board

of Directors of Avison Young after 10 years’ service, Mr. Levine remains on Avison Young’s Executive Committee. Mr. Levine

has 40 years of experience in commercial real estate sales, leasing, and advisory roles and has worked with many leading developers, equity

partners, and renowned investors. Having consummated many billions of dollars in transactions, he has been responsible for the sale of

numerous landmark and Class-A office buildings, shopping centers, industrial properties, and major development sites.

Joseph Sierchio. Mr. Sierchio has been

engaged in the practice of law as the principal of Sierchio Law LLP, our general corporate counsel since August 2019; prior thereto Mr.

Sierchio provided legal services to the Company as a partner of Satterlee Stephens LLP, our counsel, from September 2016 to August 2019.

Since 1975, Mr. Sierchio has continuously practiced corporate and securities law in New York City, representing, in the United States,

domestic and foreign private and public corporations, investors, brokerage firms, and entrepreneurs. Mr. Sierchio is admitted in all New

York state courts and federal courts in the Eastern, Northern, and Southern Districts of the State of New York as well as the federal

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Mr. Sierchio was invited to join the Board due to his experience representing corporations (public

and private) and individuals in numerous and various organizational, compliance, administrative, governance, finance (equity and debt

private and public offerings), regulatory and legal matters as well as his familiarity with the Company’s business and operations.

Mr. Sierchio also served as a director of RenovaCare, Inc. from August 26, 2010 to June 22, 2018. Mr. Sierchio earned his J.D. at Cornell

University Law School in 1974, and a B.A., with Highest Distinction in Economics from Rutgers College at Rutgers University in 1971, and

where he was also named a Henry Rutgers Scholar.

All of our directors are elected annually to serve

for one year or until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

Family Relationships and Other Matters

There are no family relationships among or between

any of our officers and directors.

Legal Proceedings

None of or directors or officers are involved in any

legal proceedings as described in Regulation S-K (§229.401(f)).

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Because we do not have a class of equity securities

registered pursuant to section 12 of the Exchange Act, we are not required to make the disclosures required by Item 405 of Regulation

SK.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

General

We believe that good corporate

governance is important to ensure that our company is managed for the long-term benefit of our stockholders. We periodically review our

corporate governance policies and practices and compare them to those suggested by various authorities in corporate governance and the

practices of other public companies. As a result, we have adopted policies and procedures that we believe are in the best interests of

SolarWindow and our stockholders.

36

Corporate Governance Guidelines; Code of Conduct and Ethics; Amended

and Restated Insider Trading Policy

Our Corporate Governance

Guidelines assist our board of directors in the exercise of its duties and responsibilities and to serve the best interests of SolarWindow

and our stockholders. These guidelines, which provide a framework for the conduct of our board’s business addresses the role of

a director, Board composition, Board meetings, access to management, Board compensation and other topics.

We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all

of our officers, directors and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting

officer. The Code of Ethics is designed to deter wrongdoing, and to promote, among other things, honest and ethical conduct, full, fair,

accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that we file with, or submit to the SEC, compliance with applicable

governmental laws, rules and regulations, the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Ethics, and accountability for adherence

to the Code of Ethics.

We have adopted an Amended and Restated Insider Trading

Policy (the “ITP”) that applies to all officers, directors, employees and other persons, such as contractors or consultants

who have access to material nonpublic information. The ITP also applies to family members, other members of a person’s household

and entities controlled by a person covered by the ITP. The purpose of the ITP is to provide guidelines with respect to transactions in

the Company’s securities and the handling of material nonpublic information about the Company and the companies with which the Company

does business. The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted this Policy to promote compliance with federal, state and foreign securities

laws that prohibit certain persons who are aware of material nonpublic information about a company from: (i) trading in securities of

that company; or (ii) providing material nonpublic information to other persons who may trade on the basis of that information. Oversight

and implementation of the ITP is performed by the ITP Compliance Committee which is comprised of Joseph Sierchio, Director and General

Counsel, Gary Parmar, Director and Justin Frere, Interim CFO and Secretary.

We have posted a copy of

our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, and Amended and Restated Insider Trading Policy on the Investor

section of our website at https://www.solarwindow.com/investors/corporate-governance/. Our full Board of Directors must approve in advance

any waivers of the Code of Ethics. We will post any amendments or waivers from our Code of Ethics that apply to our executive officers

and directors on the “Corporate Governance” section of our website.

Board Independence

We are not listed on a major

U.S. securities exchange and, therefore, are not subject to the corporate governance requirements of any such exchange, including those

related to the independence of directors. However, Our Board considers that a director is independent when the director is not an officer

or employee of the Company, does not have any relationship which would, or could reasonably appear to, materially interfere with the independent

judgment of such director, and the director otherwise meets the independence requirements under the listing standards of FINRA and the

rules and regulations of the SEC. Our Board has reviewed the materiality of any relationship that each of our directors has with the Company,

either directly or indirectly. Based on this review, our Board has affirmatively determined that two of our five directors, including

Bob Levine and Gary Parmar, qualify as “independent” directors.

Board Leadership Structure

We currently have three executive

officers and five directors; two of which are independent. At present, Mr. Bhogal serves as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of

the Board, Mr. Rhee serves as our President, Director and President and CEO of SolarWindow Asia Co., Ltd, and .Mr. Frere serves as

our Interim Chief Financial Officer and Secretary.

Our Bylaws provide our Board

with flexibility to combine or separate the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer in accordance with its determination

that utilizing one or the other structure would be in the best interests of our Company and its stockholders. Our Board believes that

the current leadership structure, which consists of a Chief Executive Officer and Chairman is appropriate. Our Board also considered that our

Audit Committee, which oversees critical matters such as the integrity of our financial statements, consist entirely of independent directors.

Our Board has reviewed our current Board leadership structure, our size, the nature of our business, the regulatory framework under which

we operate, our stockholder base, our peer group and other relevant factors, and has determined that this structure is currently the most

appropriate Board leadership structure for our company.

37

Board Committees

Audit Committee

Our Board has established a separately-designated

independent Audit Committee of the Board in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act for the purpose of overseeing our

accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of our annual financial statements. Our Audit Committee currently consists of

Mr. Parmar (Chair), Mr. Levine. The functions of the Audit Committee include the retention of our independent registered

public accounting firm, reviewing and approving the planned scope, proposed fee arrangements and results of the Company’s annual

audit, reviewing the adequacy of the Company’s accounting and financial controls and reviewing the independence of the Company’s

independent registered public accounting firm. The Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is independent

as determined under Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. Our Board has determined that Mr. Gary Parmar is an audit committee financial expert

(as that term is defined in Item 407 of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act). The Audit Committee is governed by a written charter approved

by the Board, a copy of which is available on our website at https://www.solarwindow.com/investors/corporate-governance/.

Compensation Committee

The Board does not currently have a standing Compensation

Committee. The full Board establishes our overall compensation policies and reviews recommendations submitted by our management.

Nominating Committee

The Board does not currently have a standing Nominating

Committee. We do not maintain a policy for considering nominees. Our Bylaws provide that the number of Directors shall be fixed from time

to time by the Board, but in no event shall be less than the minimum required by law. The Board should be large enough to maintain our

required expertise but not too large to function inefficiently. Director nominees are recommended, reviewed and approved by the entire

Board. The Board believes that this process is appropriate due to the number of directors on the Board and the opportunity to benefit

from a variety of opinions and perspectives in determining director nominees by involving the full Board.

While the Board is solely responsible for the selection

and nomination of Directors, the Board may consider nominees recommended by stockholders as deemed appropriate. The Board evaluates each

potential nominee in the same manner regardless of the source of the potential nominee’s recommendation. Although we do not have

a policy regarding diversity, the Board does take into consideration the value of diversity among Board members in background, experience,

education and perspective in considering potential nominees for recommendation to the Board for selection. Stockholders who wish to recommend

a nominee should send nominations to Mr. Jatinder S. Bhogal, CEO or Mr. Justin Frere, Interim CFO and Secretary, 9375 E. Shea Blvd., Suite

107-B, Scottsdale, AZ 85260, that includes all information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of

proxies for the election of directors. The recommendation must be accompanied by a written consent of the individual to stand for election

if nominated by the Board and to serve if elected.

Compensation Consultants

We have not historically relied upon the advice of

compensation consultants in determining Named Executive Officer compensation. Instead, the full Board reviews compensation levels and

makes adjustments based on their personal knowledge of competition in the market place, publicly available information and informal surveys

of human resource professionals.

38

Board of Directors Meetings, Committees of the Board of Directors, and

Annual Meeting Attendance

During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2021,

all directors attended at least 75% or more of the aggregate of the meetings of the Board. The Board met four (4) times and acted by written

consent Eleven (11) times during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2021; the Audit Committee was established in July 2019, met one (1)

time and did not act by written consent during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2021. We did not have an annual meeting of shareholders

during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2021 or 2020.

The Audit Committee is the only standing committee

of the Board of Directors. The full Board is responsible for performing the functions of: (i) the Compensation Committee and (ii) the

Nominating Committee.

Board Role in Risk Oversight

Risk is inherent in every business, and how well a

business manages risk can ultimately determine its success. We face a number of risks, including strategic risks, enterprise risks, financial

risks, and regulatory risks. While our management is responsible for day-to-day management of various risks we face, the Board, as a whole,

is responsible for evaluating our exposure to risk and to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by

management are adequate and functioning as designed. The Board reviews and discusses policies with respect to risk assessment and risk

management. The Board also has oversight responsibility with respect to the integrity of our financial reporting process and systems of

internal control regarding finance and accounting, as well as its financial statements.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Our Board is responsible for establishing the

compensation and benefits for our executive officers. The Board reviews the performance and total compensation package for our executive

officers, and considers the modification of existing compensation and the adoption of new compensation plans. The board has not retained

any compensation consultants.

The goals of our executive compensation program are

to attract, motivate and retain individuals with the skills and qualities necessary to support and develop our business within the framework

of our small size and available resources. We designed our executive compensation program to achieve the following objectives:

· reward performance; and

39

Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the total compensation

paid to or earned by each named executive officer for Fiscal 2021 and Fiscal 2020 :

(1) The amounts in this column

represent employer sponsored and paid health coverage, vacation pay and health insurance premium reimbursement for Mr. Conklin who maintained

private insurance coverage and was reimbursed an agreed upon amount each month to offset his out-of-pocket medical insurance premiums

through December 31, 2019 and prior to the Company established Health benefit plans. With regard to Mr. Bhogal, the amount in this column

represents fees for his service on the Board during fiscal 2020.

(2) On August 7, 2017, the Company

appointed Jatinder Bhogal to the Board of Directors. Mr. Bhogal has provided consulting services to the Company since 2011. Pursuant

to Mr. Bhogal’s consulting agreements in effect prior to July 1, 2020, Mr. Bhogal received compensation of $18,750 per month. Effective

July 1, 2020, the Company, Mr. Bhogal, and Vector Asset Management, Inc., a Canadian entity wholly-owned by Mr. Bhogal (“VAMI”),

entered into an Executive Consulting Agreement (the “ECA”) whereby Mr. Bhogal, in addition to his role as a Director, will

serve the Company as its President (On March 1, 2021, Mr. Bhogal resigned as President and Mr. Rhee was appointed President) and Chief

Executive Officer (Principle Executive Officer). Pursuant to the ECA, which has an initial term of three years with one year extensions

thereafter unless otherwise terminated, VAMI 1) is paid an annual salary of $410,000 (the “Annual Base Fee”); 2) is

eligible for a discretionary performance-based annual bonus of up to 40% of the then annual base fee in effect; 3) received a stock option

grant to purchase up to 2,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $2.60 per share, exercisable on,

among other methods, a cashless basis prior to up-listing to a national exchange and exercisable for cash thereafter. The stock option

vests as to 50% on July 1, 2020 and as to the remaining 50% on July 1, 2021. The Stock Option is subject to the terms and conditions

of the Stock Option Grant and Grant Agreement dated June 29, 2020 with an effective date of July 1, 2020. The aggregate grant date fair

value of the stock option award, determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, was $1.54 per share. For additional information, see

“NOTE 5 – Stock Options” and “NOTE 7 - Transactions with Related Persons” of our notes to financial statements

contained in this annual report.

(3) On December 27, 2017, the

Company and Mr. Conklin entered into an employment agreement (the “2018 Employment Agreement”) pursuant to which Mr.

Conklin was paid an annual salary of $275,000, received a grant of 1,008,000 stock options and was entitled to a medical insurance premium

reimbursement stipend of $2,166 per month up until the company established an employer based medical insurance plan that became effective

on January 1, 2020. On October 22, 2018, Mr. Conklin resigned as Chief Financial Officer commensurate with the appointment of Steve Yan-Klassen

as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. Effective July 1, 2020, Mr. John Conklin resigned as the Company’s President and

Chief Executive Officer and as a Director and assumed a new executive role with the Company as its Chief Technology Officer. Effective

November 19, 2020, Mr. Conklin resigned all positions.

(4) Mr. Frere has served as the

Company’s Controller since August of 2011 and was appointed Secretary on July 5, 2019. Effective July 23, 2020, Mr. Frere was appointed

to also serve as the Company’s Interim Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) and Interim Treasurer. Mr. Frere is

providing his services on an as needed basis; Mr. Frere’s engagement is at will and can be terminated by either party on notice.

Mr. Frere’s aggregate fee for his services is $10,000 per month.

(5) Effective October 22, 2018,

the Company appointed Steve Yan-Klassen to serve as our Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Yan-Klassen had no employment agreement. Mr. Yan-Klassen

resigned effective July 22, 2020 to pursue other business. Mr. Yan-Klassen received an annual salary of $31,500 Canadian dollars.

(6) On July 1, 2020, the Company

appointed John Rhee to the Board of Directors. On August 31, 2020, the Company and Mr. John Rhee entered into an Executive Services Consulting

Agreement (the “ESCA”), which was amended effective March 1, 2021 to appoint Mr. Rhee to the office of President and increase

his monthly fee from $10,000 to $22,000. Pursuant to the ESCA as amended, 1) Mr. Rhee provides executive consulting services to the Company,

and it’s directly and indirectly owned subsidiaries, in connection with the Company’s efforts to establish an operating presence

in the Republic of Korea; 2) the Initial Term of the ESCA is three years, but may be extended annually thereafter; 3) Mr. Rhee’s

engagement pursuant to the ESCA is an “at-will” engagement; 4) Mr. Rhee is paid a monthly base fee of $22,000; and 5) Mr.

Rhee received a stock option grant to purchase up to 2,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with exercise prices as follows:

as to 1,000,000 options, $3.66 per share; as to 800,000 options, $6.00 per share and as to 700,000 options, $8.00 per share, exercisable

on, among other methods, a cashless basis prior to up-listing to a national exchange and exercisable for cash thereafter. The stock option

vests as to 500,000 on the date of grant; as to the next 800,000 shares on the six-month anniversary of the date of grant; as to the

next 700,000 shares on the 12-month anniversary of the date of grant; and as to the last 500,000 shares on the eighteen-month anniversary

of the date of grant. The Stock Option is subject to the terms and conditions of the Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement dated August

31, 2020. The aggregate grant date weighted average fair value of the stock option award, determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic

718, was $1.51 per share. For additional information, see “NOTE 5 – Stock Options” of our notes to financial statements

contained in this annual report.

40

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal-Year End

The following table sets forth information regarding equity awards that

have been previously awarded to each of the Named Executives and which remained outstanding as of August 31, 2021.

Option Awards

(1) On November 21, 2017, pursuant

the grant of stock options to our Board and certain personnel for their services, we granted a stock option to purchase 90,000 shares

of our common stock. On July 5, 2019, pursuant to a grant of stock options to our Board and executives for their services, we granted

a stock option to purchase 1,008,000 and 50,000 shares of our common stock. On July 1, 2020, pursuant to an Executive Consulting Agreement

and Stock Option Grant and Grant Agreement both dated June 29, 2020 we granted a stock option to purchase 2,500,000 shares of our common

stock.

(2) On November 21, 2017, pursuant

the grant of stock options to our Board for their services, we granted a stock option to purchase 40,000 shares of our common stock.

On July 5, 2019, pursuant to a grant of stock options to our Board and executives for their services, we granted a stock option to purchase

50,000 shares of our common stock to each Mr. Conklin and Mr. Yan-Klassen. Vesting of these awards ceased upon the resignation of Mr.

Conklin and Mr. Yan-Klassen.

(3) On July 5, 2019, pursuant

to a grant of stock options to our Board and executives for their services, we granted a stock option to purchase 50,000 shares of our

common stock.

(4) On July 5, 2019, pursuant

to a grant of stock options to our Board and executives for their services, we granted a stock option to purchase 50,000 shares of our

common stock.

(5) On August 31, 2020, pursuant

to an Executive Services Consulting Agreement and Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement, we granted a stock option to purchase 2,500,000

shares of our common stock.

Employee directors,

which include Mr. Bhogal and Mr. Rhee, are eligible to receive stock option compensation but do not receive cash compensation in addition

to their monthly salary for services rendered as a director.

Termination and Change of Control

On August 31, 2020, the Company and Mr. John Rhee entered

into an Executive Services Consulting Agreement as amended on March 1, 2021. Pursuant to the terms of the ESCA as amended, Mr. Rhee will

receive an annual salary of $264,000, and a grant to purchase 2,500,000 stock options. Pursuant to the ESCA, if the executive’s

termination is voluntary, involuntary, for cause or without cause, the Company will be obligated to pay only the monthly base fee through

the date of termination. Regarding the 2,500,000 options granted pursuant to the ESCA of which 500,000 remain unvested as of August 31,

2021 and are scheduled to vest on February 28, 2022, if the executive is terminated for cause, the right to exercise all of their options

shall terminate immediately and vesting shall cease. If termination is for poor performance, the right to exercise their options, to the

extent vested, shall continue until the option expiration date, but there shall be no further vesting of the options. If termination is

without cause or not for poor performance, these options shall continue to vest and shall continue to be exercisable through the option

expiration date. If termination is by the executive, the right to exercise the options, to the extent vested, shall continue until the

option expiration date, but there shall be no further vesting of the options.

41

On June 29, 2020, we entered into the Executive Consulting

Agreement with Mr. Jatinder S. Bhogal. Pursuant to the terms of the ECA, Mr. Bhogal will receive an annual salary of $410,000, is eligible

for a discretionary performance-based annual bonus of up to 40% of the then Annual Base Fee in effect, and a grant to purchase 2,500,000

stock options. In the event that Mr. Bhogal’s employment is terminated without cause, he will be entitled to receive the Annual

Base Fee in effect at termination paid over the subsequent 12 months. In the event that, following a change of control, the ECA is terminated

by the Company without cause within twelve (12) months of the change of control, then VAMI shall be entitled to receive an amount equal

to the Annual Base Fee in effect on the termination date multiplied by 1.5, which amount is payable in a lump sum within thirty (30) days.

Upon termination, the stock option may be exercised prior to the first to occur of (a) the expiration of the two-year period which commences

on the date of termination and expires on the second anniversary of such date of termination or (b) the expiration date of the term of

this stock option. As of August 31, 2021, in the event of termination for reasons other than cause, death or disability or for good reason

the cash severance due to Mr. Bhogal would be $410,000. All 2,500,000 options are vested. The payments due on termination and termination

following a Change of Control are subject to the requirement that Mr. Bhogal execute a release agreement in a form requested by the Company.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table provides information on stock option

exercises and shares acquired on the vesting of stock awards by our executive officers during fiscal year 2021:

Option Awards Stock Awards

(1) On November 21, 2017, pursuant

the grant of stock options to our Board and certain personnel for their services, we granted a stock option to purchase 20,000 shares

of our common stock. On January 13, 2021, Mr. Frere exercised the remaining 10,000 stock options on a cashless basis and received 6,943

shares of restricted common stock.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

Our directors play a critical role in guiding our

strategic direction and overseeing the management of our Company. Ongoing developments in corporate governance and financial reporting

have resulted in an increased demand for such highly qualified and productive public company directors. The many responsibilities and

risks and the substantial time commitment of being a director of a public company require that we provide adequate incentives for our

directors’ continued performance by paying compensation commensurate with our directors’ workload. Our non-employee directors

are compensated based upon their respective levels of Board participation and responsibilities, including service on Board Committees.

Our employee directors receive no separate compensation for their service as directors. Our Board determines the non-employee directors’

compensation for serving on the Board and its committee(s). In establishing director compensation, the Board is guided by the following

goals:

· compensation should assist with attracting and retaining qualified directors.

42

For their services as directors, non-employee directors

received cash compensation of $1,750 per quarter during 2021 and 2021, pro-rated to the date they join the Board of Directors. Beginning

on September 1, 2019, the audit committee chairperson receives an additional $750 per quarter.

During fiscal 2021, the Company granted 50,000 options

to Joesph Sierchio in connection with his appointment to the Board. The options fair value is $2.16 per share using the Black-Scholes

Option Pricing Model. No equity-based grants were awarded to the other Board members in fiscal 2021 and no awards were granted in fiscal

2020.

Director Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the compensation earned

and paid to each non-employee director for service as a director during Fiscal 2021 and Fiscal 2020:

Name Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) Option Awards ($) (1) Total ($)

Jatinder S. Bhogal - - -

Gary Parmar (audit committee chairman) 10,000 - 10,000

Gary Parmar (audit committee chairman) 10,000 - 10,000

Harmel S. Rayat (5) 1 - 1

(1) The amounts in this column

represent the aggregate grant date fair value of stock option awards granted by the Board, determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic

718. All awards are amortized over the vesting life of the award. No options were granted in fiscal 2020. See “NOTE 5 – Stock

Options” of our notes to financial statements contained in this annual report.

(2) Mr. Rhee became a director of the Company effective

July 1, 2020. On August 31, 2020, the Company and Mr. John Rhee entered into an ESCA. Pursuant to the ESCA, Mr. Rhee received a stock

option grant of 2,500,000 shares. Those shares were granted in conjunction with the ESCA and not for Mr. Rhee’s service on the

Board. See the “Summary Compensation Table” above for additional information. Upon his appointment to the position of President

on March 1, 2021, Mr. Rhee became ineligible to receive cash compensation.

(3) Mr. Sierchio resigned from the Board effective

October 22, 2018 and was re-appointed on October 1, 2020. Pursuant to his reappointment to the Board, on October 19, 2021, we granted

Mr. Sierchio an option to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock valued at $108,000.

(4) Dr. Livesey and Mr. Horovitz both resigned from

the Board effective July 1, 2020.

(5) Mr. Rayat became a director of the Company effective

March 15, 2018. Mr. Rayat’s annual compensation for serving as Chairman of the Board of Directors was $1.00 per year. Mr. Rayat

resigned from the Board effective October 1, 2020.

43

Director Compensation - Equity

The following table shows the total number of unvested and total option awards held by each

of our non-employee directors as of August 31, 2021:

Name Vested Stock Options Outstanding (#) Unvested Stock Options Outstanding (#)

(1) On July 5, 2019, we granted stock options to our

Board and executives for their services, including we granted a stock option to purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock to Mr. Sierchio

and 52,000 shares of our common stock to Mr. Levine and Mr. Parmar.

(2) Includes 50,000 options described above, a stock

option to purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock granted on November 21, 2017 and a stock option to purchase 50,000 shares of our

common stock granted on October 19, 2021 pursuant to his appointment to the Board.

Limitation on Directors' Liabilities; Indemnification of Officers and Directors

Our Amended and Restated Bylaws designate the relative duties and responsibilities

of our officers and establish procedures for actions by directors and stockholders and other items. Our bylaws also contain extensive

indemnification provisions, which will permit us to indemnify our officers and directors to the maximum extent provided by Nevada law.

For additional information, see Exhibit 4.34 to this Annual Report.

Directors' and Officers' Liability Insurance

Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain) · 10-K for the period ended 2021-08-31, filed 2021-11-04 · accession 0001171843-21-007579

Filing HTML rendered to line-structured narrative text by the shipped reducer (datafeeds.edgar_fulltext.visible_text, keep_table_headers=True): scripts and inline-XBRL headers are dropped, and table content is reduced to its short label cells — numeric table data is not rendered and is therefore not counted. The same rendering is used for every year, so a year-over-year comparison is like for like.

The text is our rendering of the filing, not a facsimile: original pagination, typography and tables are not reproduced, and the numbers live in the financial statements (FA).

The outline locates item HEADINGS in this document. Only Items 1A and 7 have certified boundaries elsewhere in the terminal (the redline and the narrative-overlap number); every span here runs from one heading found to the next heading found.

How the outline was chosen. It is the longest chain of item headings that runs forward through both the document and the standard item order: 19 headings are on that chain and 13 further heading-shaped lines are not — the table-of-contents echo of every item, cross-references and exhibit-list mentions. Each entry's length is measured from its heading to the next heading on the chain.