| Size & multiples | |||
| Market Cap | $92.0M | Enterprise Value | $77.0M |
| P/E (TTM) | — | PEG (trailing) | — |
| P/S | 1.58× | P/FCF | 420.20× |
| EV/EBITDA | 27.62× | EV/EBIT | 145.58× |
| EV/Sales | 1.32× | EV/FCF | 351.65× |
| FCF Yield | 0.24% | Buyback Yield | — |
| Owner Earnings (TTM) | $1.2M | Owner Earnings Yield | 1.27% |
| Shareholder Yield | — | ||
| Cost of capital & EVAmethodology → | |||
| Beta (5y monthly) | 1.98 | Risk-free (assumed) | 4.00% |
| Equity risk premium (assumed) | 5.00% | Cost of Equity | 13.90% |
| After-tax Cost of Debt | 0.28% | Synthetic credit rating | AA |
| Cost of Debt · embedded (pre-tax) | 9.71% | Cost of Debt · marginal (synthetic) | 4.55% |
| WACC | 13.82% | ROIC | 0.04% |
| EVA Spread (ROIC−WACC) | −13.78% | EVA | -$2.5M |
FCF sits 81% below owner earnings — spending above maintenance (growth capex) or absorbing working capital, so FCF understates the steady-state cash the business throws off.
Synthetic rating = ICR-based credit-quality read (Damodaran), not an agency rating.
Flows TTM (last 4 quarters) · EPS TTM — · revenue TTM $58.3M · FCF TTM $219,000
Output of a disclosed model whose assumptions may be wrong — research information, not investment advice. See the Disclaimer.
Rich vs Industrials on EV/EBITDA
EV/EBITDA 85th percentile in the Industrials pool — placement read per multiple; the API emits no single blended figure, so none is shown.
Compared against all 858 Industrials names we cover — one sector-wide pool, so the median skews toward smaller (often unprofitable) companies. Try the Size band for a cap-matched read.
| Metric | This (FY) | Peer median | IQR (25–75) | %ile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV/EBITDA | 25.4x | 13.2x | 8.2x–19.7x | 85 ↑rich |
| FCF Yield | -0.6% | 4.1% | -0.3%–7.9% | 24 ↓weak |
| Dividend Yield | 0.2% | 1.3% | 0.6%–2.5% | 15 ↓weak |
| Net Margin | -0.1% | 4.7% | 0.0%–9.9% | 24 ↓weak |
| Operating Margin | 0.7% | 7.2% | 1.4%–13.5% | 24 ↓weak |
| ROE | -0.1% | 10.4% | 1.7%–18.0% | 21 ↓weak |
