Item 1A. Risk Factors
RISK FACTORS
Ownership of our common stock involves certain risks. Holders of our common stock and prospective investors should carefully consider the following risks and other information contained in this document, including our historical financial statements and related notes included herein. The following risk factors could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. This could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline, perhaps significantly, and you may lose part or all of your investment. The risks and uncertainties below are all those that we have identified as material but may not be the only risks and uncertainties facing us. Our business is subject to general risks and uncertainties that affect many other companies, including overall economic and industry conditions.
Economic Conditions and Competition
Our business is dependent on discretionary spending patterns, business travel and general economic conditions.
We depend on consumer discretionary spending, business travel and the overall economic environment. Disruptions in the economy, including recessions, high unemployment, foreclosures, bankruptcies, inflation, stock market declines and other economic impacts, could affect consumers’ ability and willingness to spend discretionary dollars. Reductions in discretionary income and spending also would impact our casino-based restaurants and food and beverage services operations. Reductions in business travel and dining, which we believe accounts for a majority of our weekday revenues at our hotel-based restaurants and food and beverage services operations, would adversely affect our revenues. If uncertain economic conditions were to persist for an extended period of time or worsen, consumers might make long-lasting changes to their discretionary spending behavior, including dining out less frequently. Adverse changes in consumer discretionary spending could be affected by many different factors that are out of our control, including international, national and local economic conditions, any of which could harm our business prospects, financial condition, operating results and cash flows. Continued uncertainty in or a worsening of the economy, generally or in a number of our markets, and our customers’ reactions to these trends could adversely affect our business and cause us to, among other things, reduce the number and frequency of new restaurant openings, close locations and delay any remodeling of existing restaurants. Our success will depend in part upon our ability to anticipate, identify and respond to changing economic and other conditions.
We operate multiple venues in some cities and are therefore sensitive to economic and other trends and developments in these cities.
We operate multiple venues in some cities. We typically operate one to five venues in the cities where we operate. Accordingly, in cities where we have multiple venues, our business is susceptible to adverse changes in these markets whether as a result of declining economic conditions, declining stock market performance, negative publicity, changes in customer preferences, increased immigration enforcement or for other reasons, and any such adverse changes may have a disproportionate effect on our overall results of operations compared to some of our competitors that may have less restaurant concentration or that do not operate in our markets. Any regional occurrences such as local labor strikes, natural disasters, prolonged inclement weather, acts of terrorism or other national emergencies, accidents, energy shortages, system failures or other unforeseen events in or around these cities could result in temporary or permanent closings of our venues, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations as a whole.
8
Table of Contents
Competition in the restaurant industry is intense.
The restaurant and hospitality industry is intensely competitive with respect to price, quality of service, location, ambiance of facilities and type and quality of food. The industry is also characterized by the continual introduction of new concepts and is subject to rapidly changing consumer preferences, tastes, trends and eating and purchasing habits. Our success depends in part on our ability to anticipate and respond quickly to changing consumer preferences, and other factors affecting the restaurant and hospitality industry, including new market entrants and demographic changes. Shifts in consumer preferences away from upscale steakhouses or beef in general, which are significant components of our concepts’ menus and appeal, whether as a result of economic, competitive or other factors, could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
A substantial number of national and regional restaurant chains, as well as independently owned restaurants, compete with us for customers, restaurant locations and qualified management and other restaurant staff. There is also competition from non-steak but upscale and high-energy restaurants, and other high-end hospitality services companies and high-energy nightlife concepts. To the extent that our restaurants and F&B hospitality services operations are in hotels, casinos, resorts and similar locations, we are subject to competition in the broader lodging and hospitality markets that could draw potential customers away from our locations.
Some of our competitors have greater financial, marketing and operating resources than we do, have been in business longer, have greater name recognition and are better established in the markets where our restaurants and F&B hospitality services operations are located or where we may expand. In addition, improved product offerings in the fast casual segment of the restaurant industry, combined with the effects of negative economic conditions and other factors, may lead consumers to choose less expensive alternatives. Our competitors may be more adept at adapting and responding to new technological developments, including artificial intelligence, to develop customer insights that assist in increasing customer demand. Our inability to compete successfully with other restaurants, other F&B hospitality services operations and other segments of the industry may harm our ability to maintain acceptable levels of revenue growth, limit our development of new restaurants or concepts, or force us to close one or more of our restaurants or F&B hospitality services operations.
We may also need to evolve our concepts to compete with popular new restaurant or F&B hospitality services operation formats, concepts or trends that emerge from time to time, and we cannot provide any assurance that any changes we make to any of our concepts in response will be successful or not adversely affect our profitability.
Failure to adapt to evolving consumer dining preferences could negatively impact our operations and competitive position, which could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Our business depends on consumer discretionary spending and is affected by changes in consumer tastes. Any shifts in consumer preferences away from the kinds of food or beverages we offer, particularly beef or alcohol, whether because of dietary or health reasons, sustainability concerns or otherwise, would make our restaurants less appealing and could reduce customer traffic and/or impose practical limits on pricing.
It is possible that consumers may no longer regard our menu offerings favorably, that we will no longer be able to develop new menu items that appeal to consumer preferences or that there will be a drop in consumer demands for restaurant dining. Restaurant traffic and our resulting sales depend in part on our ability to anticipate, identify and respond to changing consumer preferences. The rising popularity of certain weight loss drugs, which suppress a person’s appetite, may impact sales or traffic in our restaurants. Additionally, a shift in consumer drinking preferences and behaviors due to, among others, changing demographics, health and wellness trends and taste preferences may lead to reduced consumption of beverage alcohol products. If we are unable to adapt to changes in consumer preferences and trends, we may lose customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Health and Safety
Health concerns arising from outbreaks of flu viruses or other diseases, or regional or global health pandemics could severely affect our business.
The United States and other countries have experienced, or may experience in the future, outbreaks of viruses, such as coronavirus, norovirus, Avian Flu or “SARS,” H1N1 or “swine flu,” or other diseases such as bovine spongiform encephalopathy, commonly known as “BSE” or “mad cow disease.” If a virus is transmitted by human contact, our
9
Table of Contents
employees or customers may become infected, or may choose, or be advised, to avoid gathering in public places, any of which may adversely affect the guest traffic at our restaurants and the ability to adequately staff our restaurants, receive deliveries on a timely basis or perform functions at the corporate level. We also may be adversely affected if jurisdictions in which we have restaurants impose mandatory closures, seek voluntary closures or impose restrictions on operations. Even if such measures are not implemented and a virus or other disease does not spread significantly, the perceived risk of infection or significant health risk may adversely affect our business.
To the extent that a virus or disease is food-borne, or perceived to be food-borne, future outbreaks may adversely affect the price and availability of certain food products and cause our customers to eat less of such products. For example, health concerns relating to the consumption of beef or to specific events such as the outbreak of “mad cow disease” may adversely impact sales of our beef-related menu items. In addition, public concern over “avian flu” may cause fear about the consumption of chicken, eggs and other products derived from poultry. The inability to serve beef or poultry-based products would restrict our ability to provide a variety of menu items to our customers. If we change our menu in response to such concerns, we may lose customers who do not prefer the new menu, and we may not be able to sufficiently attract new customers to produce the revenue needed to restore the profitability of our restaurant operations. We also may generate different or additional competitors for our intended customers as a result of such a menu change and may not be able to successfully compete against such competitors.
Failure to protect food supplies and adhere to food safety standards could result in food borne illnesses and adversely affect our business.
Failure to protect our food supply or enforce food safety policies, such as proper food temperature and adherence to shelf-life dates, could result in food-borne illnesses to our guests. Also, our reputation of providing high-quality food is an important factor in our guests choosing our restaurants. Whether or not traced to our restaurants or those of our competitors, instances of food borne illness or other food safety issues could reduce the demand for certain or all of our menu offerings. If any of our guest become ill from consuming our products, the affected restaurants may be forced to close, and we may be subject to legal liability. An instance of food contamination from one of our restaurants or suppliers could have far-reaching effects, as the contamination, or the perception of contamination could affect any or all of our restaurants. Publicity related to either product contamination, recalls, or food-borne illness, including BSE, aphthous fever, which is also known as “hoof and mouth disease”, and hepatitis A, listeria, salmonella and e-coli may also injure our brand and may affect the selection of our restaurants or those of our licensees or franchisees by guests based on fear of such illnesses. In addition, the occurrence of food-borne illnesses or food safety issues could also adversely affect the price and availability of affected ingredients, which could result in disruptions in our supply chain and/or lower margins for us and our licensees and franchisees.
Labor and Supplies
Changes to wage, immigration and labor laws could increase our costs substantially.
Under the minimum wage laws in most domestic jurisdictions, we are permitted to pay certain hourly employees a wage that is less than the base minimum wage because these employees receive tips as a substantial part of their income. As of December 28, 2025, approximately 31% of our employees earn this lower minimum wage in their respective locations since tips constitute a substantial part of their income. If cities, states or the federal government change their laws to require all employees to be paid the general employee minimum base wage regardless of supplemental tip income, our labor costs would increase substantially. Certain states in which we operate restaurants also have adopted or are considering adopting minimum wage statutes that exceed the federal minimum wage. We may be unable or unwilling to increase our prices to pass these increased labor costs on to our customers, in which case, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
A restaurant company employer may claim a credit against the company’s federal income taxes for FICA taxes paid on certain tip wages (the “FICA tip credit”). We utilize the federal FICA tip credit to reduce our federal income tax expense. Changes in the tax law could reduce or eliminate the FICA tip credit, which could negatively impact our results of operations and cash flows in future periods.
Further, the federal government has made some recent changes to immigration and deportation policies, and the U.S. Congress or Department of Homeland Security may implement further changes to federal immigration laws, regulations or enforcement programs. Some of these changes may increase our obligations for compliance and oversight, which could subject us to additional costs and make our hiring process more cumbersome or reduce the availability of
10
Table of Contents
potential employees. Even if we operate our restaurants in strict compliance with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and state requirements, some of our employees may not meet federal work eligibility or residency requirements, which could lead to a disruption in our work force. Although we require all of our new employees to provide us with the government-specified documentation evidencing their employment eligibility, some of our employees may, without our knowledge, be unauthorized workers. Unauthorized workers are subject to seizure and deportation and may subject us to fines, penalties or loss of our business license in certain jurisdictions. Additionally, a government audit could result in a disruption to our workforce or adverse publicity that could negatively impact our brand and our use of E-Verify and/or potential for receipt of letters from the Social Security Administration requesting information (commonly referred to as no-match letters) could make it more difficult to recruit and/or retain qualified employees.
Potential changes in labor laws or increased union recruiting activities could result in portions of our workforce being subjected to greater organized labor influence. Although we do not currently have any unionized employees, labor legislation could have an adverse effect on our business and financial results by imposing requirements that could potentially increase our costs, reduce our flexibility and impact our ability to service our customers. In addition, a labor dispute involving some or all of our employees could harm our reputation, disrupt our operations and reduce our revenues and resolution of such disputes may increase our costs.
The loss of key personnel or difficulties recruiting and retaining qualified personnel could adversely affect our business and financial results.
Our success depends substantially on the contributions and abilities of key executives and other employees, and on our ability to recruit and retain high-quality employees to work in and manage our restaurants. We must continue to recruit, retain and motivate management and other employees sufficient to maintain our current business and support our projected growth. A loss of key employees or a significant shortage of high-quality restaurant employees to maintain our current business and support our projected growth could adversely affect our business and financial results.
The restaurant industry has in the past faced labor challenges, particularly coming out of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although, we have been able to fully staff our restaurants in challenging labor environments, there is no assurance that we will be able to continue to effectively manage our employee base and avoid a labor shortage.
We occupy most of our restaurants and some of our food and beverage hospitality services locations under long-term non-cancelable leases under which we may remain obligated to perform even if we close those operations, and we may be unable to renew leases at the end of their terms.
Most of our restaurants and some of our food and beverage hospitality operations are located in premises that we lease. Many of our current leases are non-cancelable and typically have terms ranging from 10 to 15 years with renewal options for terms ranging from 5 to 10 years. We believe that future leases that we enter into will be on substantially similar terms. Fixed payments and/or minimum percentage rent payments under our operating leases and management agreements account for a significant portion of our operating expenses. This may increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions, limit our ability to obtain additional financing, and limit our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in our business.
We primarily depend on cash flow from operations to pay our obligations and to fulfill our other cash needs. If our business does not generate sufficient cash flow from operating activities and sufficient funds are not otherwise available to us from borrowings under our credit facility or other sources, we may not be able to meet our operating lease and management agreement obligations, grow our business, respond to competitive challenges or fund our other liquidity and capital needs, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
If we were to close or fail to open a restaurant, we would generally remain committed to perform our obligations under the applicable lease, which could include, among other things, payment of the base rent for the balance of the lease term. Our obligation to continue making rent payments and fulfilling other lease obligations in respect of leases for closed or unopened restaurants could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Alternatively, at the end of the lease term and any renewal period for a restaurant, we may be unable to renew the lease without substantial additional cost, if at all. If we cannot renew such a lease we may be forced to close or relocate a restaurant, which could subject us to construction and other costs and risks.
11
Table of Contents
Additionally, negative effects on our existing and potential landlords due to the inaccessibility of credit and other unfavorable economic factors may adversely affect our business and results of operations. If our landlords are unable to obtain financing or remain in good standing under their existing financing arrangements, they may be unable to provide construction contributions or satisfy other lease covenants to us. If any landlord files for bankruptcy protection, the landlord may be able to reject our lease in the bankruptcy proceedings. While we would under some circumstances have the option to retain our rights under the lease, we could not compel the landlord to perform any of its obligations and would be left with damages (which are subject to collectability risk) as our sole recourse. Our development of new restaurants may also be adversely affected by the negative financial situations of potential developers, landlords and host sites. Such parties may delay or cancel development projects or renovations of existing projects due to the instability in the credit markets and economic uncertainty. This could reduce the number of high-quality locations available that we would consider for new restaurants or cause the quality of the sites in which the restaurants and food and beverage hospitality services operations are located to deteriorate. Any of these developments could have an adverse effect on our existing businesses or cause us to curtail new projects.
We depend upon frequent deliveries of food, alcohol and other supplies, which subjects us to the possible risks of shortages, interruptions and price fluctuations.
Our ability to maintain consistent quality throughout our locations depends in part upon our ability to acquire fresh, quality products, including beef, seafood, produce and related items, from reliable sources in accordance with our specifications. We currently purchase our food products from various suppliers. We have elected to purchase our beef from a limited number of suppliers. If there were any shortages, interruptions or significant price fluctuations in beef or seafood or if our suppliers were unable to perform adequately or fail to distribute products or supplies to our restaurants, or terminate or refuse to renew any contract with us, this could cause a short-term increase in our costs or cause us to remove certain items from our menu, increase the price of certain offerings or temporarily close a location, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
In addition, we purchase beer, wine and spirits from distributors who own the exclusive rights to sell such alcoholic beverage products in the geographic areas in which our restaurants operate. Our continued ability to purchase certain brands of alcoholic beverages depends upon maintaining our relationships with those distributors, of which there can be no assurance. If any of our alcohol beverage distributors cease to supply us, we may be forced to offer brands of alcoholic beverage which have less consumer appeal or that do not match our brand image, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Increases in commodity prices would adversely affect our results of operations.
Our profitability depends in part on our ability to anticipate and react to changes in commodity costs, which have a substantial effect on our total costs. The purchase of beef represents approximately 35% of our food and beverage costs. The market for beef is subject to extreme price fluctuations due to seasonal shifts, climate conditions, the price of feed, industry demand, energy demand and other factors. Our ability to forecast and manage our commodities could significantly affect our gross margins. Tariffs and agricultural labor shortages resulting from changes in immigration policies may also increase commodities costs, as could international conflicts and other geopolitical events. Energy prices can also affect our operating results because increased energy prices may cause increased transportation costs for beef and other commodities and supplies, and increased costs for the utilities required to run each restaurant. Historically we have passed increased commodity and other costs on to our customers by increasing the prices of our menu items. While we believe these price increases have historically not affected customer traffic, there can be no assurance that additional price increases would not affect future customer traffic. If prices increase in the future and we are unable to anticipate or mitigate these increases, or if there are shortages for beef, our business and results of operations would be adversely affected.
The imposition of new or increased tariffs could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Beginning in 2025, the U.S. government announced significantly increased tariffs on foreign imports into the U.S. from certain countries and jurisdictions, including Canada, China, Mexico and the European Union, and in some cases threatened to impose additional tariffs. In response, several countries have imposed, or threatened to impose, reciprocal tariffs on imports from the U.S. and other retaliatory measures. Certain of our restaurant supplies, food and beverages are sourced from outside the U.S., in particular alcoholic beverages sourced from Mexico, and may be subject to these tariffs. If these tariffs are imposed, or if retaliatory trade measures are taken by foreign countries in response to
12
Table of Contents
additional tariffs, it could have the impact of increasing the aggregate purchase cost of those commodities or reducing the supply of available commodities. We may be required to raise our menu prices to offset increased cost, which may negatively impact our restaurant traffic, or incur additional expenses. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Strategy and Operations
Unsuccessful implementation of any or all of the initiatives of our business strategy, including opening new restaurants and attracting new F&B hospitality service opportunities, could negatively impact our operations.
One key element of our growth strategy is opening new restaurants and F&B hospitality services locations. We believe there are opportunities to add approximately six to ten new locations (restaurants and/or hospitality services operations) annually, with a focus on operating under licensing or management agreements (referred to as our “capital light strategy”). However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to open new restaurants or F&B hospitality services locations at the rate that we currently expect.
Our success in growing our business through the opening of new restaurants and F&B hospitality locations is dependent upon a number of factors, including our ability to: cost-effectively operate in markets that we are not familiar with, find suitable license and food and beverage partners, find suitable locations, reach acceptable lease terms, maintain adequate capital, find qualified contractors, obtain licenses and permits, manage construction and development costs, recruit and train appropriate staff and properly manage the new venue. Unanticipated costs or delays in the development or construction of future restaurants could impede our ability to open new restaurants timely and cost-effectively, which could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Specifically, some of the factors that adversely affect the cost and time associated with the development and construction of our restaurants include: labor disputes, shortages of materials or skilled labor, adverse weather conditions, unforeseen engineering problems, environmental problems, construction or zoning problems, local government regulations, modifications in design, and other unanticipated increases in cost.
Additionally, our restaurants are expensive to build, and we, our managed unit partners and our licensees incur significant capital and pre-opening expenses. Our business and profitability may be adversely affected if the “ramp-up” period for a new location lasts longer than we expect or if the profitability of a new location dips after our initial “ramp-up” marketing program ends. New locations may not be profitable, and their sales performance may not follow historical or projected patterns. If we are forced to close any new restaurants, we will incur losses for certain buildout costs and pre-opening expenses incurred in connection with opening such operations.
We face a variety of risks associated with doing business with licensees and franchisees.
We rely in part on our licensees and franchisees and the manner in which they operate the STK and Benihana restaurants to develop and promote our business. As of December 28, 2025, we had five licensed STK restaurants and twelve franchised Benihana restaurants.
Our licensees and franchisees are required to operate our restaurants according to the specific guidelines we set forth, which are essential to maintaining brand integrity and reputation, as well as in accordance with all laws and regulations applicable to us, and all laws and regulations applicable in the countries in which we operate. We provide training to these licensees and franchisees to integrate them into our operating strategy and culture. However, since we do not have day-to-day control over these restaurants, we cannot give assurance that there will not be differences in product and service quality, operations, labor law enforcement, marketing or profitability or that there will be adherence to all of our guidelines and applicable laws. In addition, if our licensees and franchisees fail to make investments necessary to maintain or improve the restaurants, guest preference for our brand could suffer. Our licensees and franchisees are subject to business risks similar to those we face such as competition; customer acceptance; fluctuations in the cost, quality and availability of raw ingredients; increased labor costs; difficulty obtaining acceptable site leases; and difficulty obtaining proper financing. Failure of licensed or franchised restaurants to operate effectively could adversely affect our cash flows or royalties, as applicable, from those operations or have a negative impact on our reputation and our business.
The success of our licensed and franchised restaurants depends on our ability to establish and maintain good relationships with our licensees and franchisees. The value of our brand and the rapport that we maintain with our licensees and franchisees are important factors for potential licensees and franchisees considering doing business with
13
Table of Contents
us. If we are unable to maintain good relationships with licensees and franchisees, we may be unable to renew license and franchise agreements and opportunities for developing new relationships with additional licensees and franchisees may be adversely affected. This, in turn, could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Although we have developed criteria to evaluate and screen prospective developers, licensees and franchisees, we cannot be certain that the developers, licensees and franchisees we select will have the business acumen necessary to open and operate successful restaurants in their areas, or that the licensees and franchisees, once selected, will be able to negotiate acceptable lease or purchase terms for prospective sites or to obtain the necessary approvals for such sites, or that financing will be available to construct and open new venues.
To the extent that our operations are located in hotels, casinos or similar destinations, our results of operations and growth are subject to the risks facing such venues.
Our ability to grow and realize profits from our operations in hotels, casinos and other branded or destination venues are dependent on the success of such venues’ business. We are subject to the actions and business decisions of our partners and third parties, in which we may have little or no influence in the overall operation of the applicable venue and such actions and decisions could have an adverse effect on our business and operations.
Litigation and Brand Risk
We face the risk of adverse publicity in connection with our operations, including as a result of increased social media usage.
The quality of our food and ambiance of our restaurants are two of our competitive strengths. Therefore, adverse publicity, whether accurate or not, relating to food quality, public health concerns, illness, safety, injury or government or industry findings concerning our venues or those operated by others could negatively impact us.
The use of social media platforms allows individuals to access a broad audience of consumers and other interested persons. Consumers value readily available information concerning goods and services that they have or plan to purchase and may act on such information without further investigation or authentication. Many social media platforms immediately publish content from their subscribers and participants, often without filters or checks on the accuracy of the content posted. Information concerning our company may be posted on such platforms at any time. If customers perceive or experience a reduction in our food quality, service or ambiance or in any way believe we have failed to deliver a consistently positive experience, this information can be immediately and broadly disseminated. This information may be adverse to our interests or may be inaccurate, each of which may harm our performance, prospects or business.
We face the risk of litigation in connection with our operations.
We are, from time to time, the subject of complaints or litigation from our consumers alleging, among other things, illness, injury or other food quality, health or operational concerns. The inappropriate use of social media by our employees or customers could lead to litigation and result in negative publicity that could damage our reputation. In addition, third party and employee claims against us based on, among other things, alleged discrimination, harassment or wrongful termination, or labor code violations may divert financial and management resources that would otherwise be used to benefit our future performance. Regardless of whether any claims against us are valid or whether we are liable, such claims may be expensive to defend and may divert time and money away from our operations. In addition, they may generate negative publicity, which could reduce customer traffic and sales. Although we maintain what we believe to be adequate levels of insurance commensurate with the nature and extent of our operations, insurance may not be available at all or in sufficient amounts to cover any liabilities with respect to these matters. A significant increase in the number of these claims or in the number of such claims that are successful could materially adversely affect our brand, financial condition or operating results. Like most employee practices liability insurance policies, our policy does not provide protection against wage and hour claims, and therefore litigation in this area could adversely impact our financial condition.
We may not be able to protect our brands, trademarks, service marks or other proprietary rights.
We have registered, or have applications pending to register, the trademarks STK, Benihana, Kona Grill and RA Sushi with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and in certain foreign countries in connection with restaurant services. Our brands, which include our trademarks, service marks and other intellectual property and proprietary rights,
14
Table of Contents
are important to our success and our competitive position. In that regard, we believe that our trade names, trademarks and service marks are valuable assets that are critical to our success. Accordingly, we devote substantial resources to the establishment and protection of our brands. However, the actions we take may be inadequate to prevent imitation of our products and concepts by others, to prevent various challenges to our registrations or applications or denials of applications for the registration of trademarks, service marks and proprietary rights in the U.S. or other countries, or to prevent others from claiming violations of their trademarks and proprietary marks. In addition, others may assert rights in our trademarks, service marks and other proprietary rights or may assert that we are infringing rights they have in their trademarks, service marks, patents or other proprietary rights. Any such disputes could force us to incur costs related to enforcing our rights. In addition, the use of trade names, trademarks or service marks similar to ours in some markets may keep us from entering those markets.
Each of our intellectual property marks is pledged as collateral securing our secured indebtedness. Default under our debt agreements could enable the lenders to sell (at auction or otherwise) our trademarks, which would have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue our business.
Negative publicity relating to a Benihana restaurant operated by an unrelated entity may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Other entities, with which we have no relations or affiliation, operate restaurants under the Benihana brand in foreign jurisdictions, including in Japan. The integrity and strength of the Benihana brand will depend in part on these other entities and how the brand is used, promoted and protected by them, which is outside of our control. For example, negative publicity or events relating to food quality, public health concerns, restaurant facilities, customer complaints or litigation alleging illness or injury, health inspection scores, employee relationships or other matters, regardless of whether the allegations are valid, affecting or occurring at other entities who use the Benihana brand, including entities unrelated to us that presently or in the future may license the Benihana brand, may negatively impact the public’s perception of Benihana. Such negative publicity may extend beyond that restaurant involved to affect some or all of our Company-owned and franchised Benihana restaurants, which may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. The risk of negative publicity is particularly great with respect to Benihana restaurants operated by an unrelated entity because we have no control over such entities’ operations and messaging, especially on a real-time basis.
Cybersecurity, Data Privacy and IT Systems
Security breaches, loss of data and other disruptions could compromise sensitive information related to our business, prevent us from accessing critical information or expose us to liability, which could adversely affect our business and our reputation.
We utilize information technology systems and networks to process, transmit and store electronic information in connection with our business activities. As the use of digital technologies has increased, cyber incidents, including deliberate attacks and attempts to gain unauthorized access to computer systems and networks, have increased in frequency and sophistication. These threats pose a risk to the security of our systems and networks and the confidentiality, availability and integrity of our data, all of which are vital to our operations and business strategy. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in preventing cyber-attacks or successfully mitigating their effects.
We estimate that approximately 79% of our sales are by credit or debit cards. Other restaurants and retailers have experienced security breaches in which credit and debit card information has been stolen. We may in the future become subject to claims for purportedly fraudulent transactions arising out of the actual or alleged theft of credit or debit card information, and we may also be subject to lawsuits or other proceedings relating to these types of incidents.
The scope and severity of risks posed to our systems from cyber threats has increased. Many of our information technology systems, including those used for our point-of-sale, delivery services and administrative functions, contain personal, financial or other information that is entrusted to us by our guests, vendors and employees. Many of our information technology systems also contain confidential information about our business, such as business strategies, development initiatives and designs. To date, these attacks have not had a material impact on our operations, but we cannot provide assurance that they will not have an impact in the future.
Our third-party providers’ information technology systems and databases are likewise subject to such risks. We provide some guest and employee data, as well as confidential information important to our business, to third parties to
15
Table of Contents
conduct our business. Individuals performing work for us and these third parties also may access some of this data, including on personally owned digital devices. To the extent we, a third party or such an individual were to experience a breach of our or their information technology systems that results in the unauthorized access, theft, use, destruction or other compromises of customers’ or employees’ data or confidential information stored in or transmitted through such systems, it could result in a material loss of revenues from the potential adverse impact to our reputation and brand, a decrease in our ability to retain customers or attract new ones, the imposition of potentially significant costs (including loss of data or payment for recovery of data), loss of business, disruption to our supply chain, business and plans. Unauthorized access, theft, use, destruction or other compromises are becoming increasingly sophisticated and may occur through a variety of methods, including attacks using malicious code, vulnerabilities in software, hardware or other infrastructure (including systems used by our supply chain), system misconfigurations, phishing or social engineering. The rapid evolution and increased adoption of artificial intelligence technologies may intensify our cybersecurity risks. Our logging capabilities, or the logging capabilities of third parties, are not always complete or sufficiently granular, affecting our ability to fully understand the scope of security breaches.
We rely heavily on information technology systems and failures or interruptions in our IT systems could harm our ability to effectively operate our business and/or result in the loss of guests or employees.
We rely heavily on information technology systems, including the point-of-sale and payment processing system in our restaurants, technologies supporting our digital and delivery services business, technologies that manage our supply chain, our rewards program, technologies that facilitate marketing initiatives, employee engagement and payroll processing, and various other processes and transactions. Our ability to effectively manage our business and coordinate the procurement, production, distribution, safety and sale of our products depends significantly on the availability, reliability and security of these systems. Many of these critical systems are provided and managed by third parties, and we are reliant on these third-party providers to implement protective measures that ensure the security and availability of their systems. Although we have operational safeguards in place, these safeguards may not be effective in preventing the failure of these third-party systems or platforms to operate effectively and be available. Failures may be caused by various factors, including power outages, catastrophic events, physical theft, computer and network failures, inadequate or ineffective redundancy, problems with transitioning to upgraded or replacement systems or platforms, flaws in third-party software or services, errors or improper use by our employees or the third-party service providers. If any of our critical IT systems were to become unreliable, unavailable, compromised or otherwise fail, and we were unable to recover in a timely manner, we could experience an interruption in our operations that could have a material adverse impact on our profitability.
Other Risks
We have a debt financing arrangement and preferred stock outstanding that could have a material adverse effect on our financial health and our ability to obtain financing in the future and may impair our ability to react quickly to changes in our business.
In connection with our acquisition of Safflower Holdings Corp., on May 1, 2024, we entered into a credit agreement pursuant to which we borrowed $350 million as a term loan and have a $40 million revolving credit facility available. On that same date we also issued shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), for $160 million that has a compounding dividend initially at 13% and which increases over time at specified intervals and which is mandatorily redeemable, at the option of the holders of a majority of such shares, after a specified period in specified circumstances. Our exposure to these financing obligations could limit our ability to satisfy our other obligations, limit our ability to operate our business and impair our competitive position. For example, they could:
16
Table of Contents
We may also incur additional indebtedness in the future, which could materially increase the impact of these risks on our financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to refinance our debt obligations or the redemption of our preferred stock. Failure to successfully refinance these obligations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our acquisition of Safflower Holdings Corp., as well as any future acquisitions, may have unanticipated consequences that could harm our business and our financial condition.
Our acquisition of Safflower Holdings Corp. and any other acquisition that we pursue, whether successfully completed or not, involves risks, including:
● problems retaining key personnel;
● potential unknown liabilities;
● difficulties of integration and failure to realize anticipated synergies; and
Future acquisitions, which may be accomplished through a cash purchase transaction, the issuance of our equity securities or a combination of both, could result in potentially dilutive issuances of our equity securities, the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities and impairment charges related to goodwill and other intangible assets, any of which could harm our business and financial condition.
Our operations may be negatively impacted by seasonality, adverse weather conditions, natural disasters or acts of terror.
Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations, adverse weather conditions and natural disasters that may at times affect the regions in which our restaurants and F&B hospitality services operations are located, regions that supply or produce food products for our restaurants, or locations of our distribution network. As a result of the seasonality of our business due to weather, holiday events and other factors, our quarterly results for any one quarter or fiscal year may not be indicative of results to be expected for any other quarter or for any year.
In addition, if adverse weather conditions or natural disasters such as fires and hurricanes affect our restaurants, we could experience closures, repair and restoration costs, food spoilage, and other significant reopening costs, any of which would adversely affect our business. We could also experience shortages or delayed shipments at our restaurants if adverse weather or natural disasters affect our distribution network, which could adversely affect our restaurants and our business as a whole. Additionally, during periods of extreme temperatures (either hot or cold) or precipitation, we may experience a reduction in customer traffic, which could adversely affect our restaurants and our business as a whole. Weather conditions are impossible to predict as is the negative impact on our business that such conditions might cause. Catastrophic weather conditions are likely to affect the supply of and costs for food products. If we do not anticipate or react to changing food costs by adjusting our purchasing practices or menu prices, our operating margins would likely deteriorate.
Terrorism, including cyber-terrorism or efforts to tamper with food supplies, could have an adverse impact on our brand and results of operations.
17
Table of Contents
We are subject to numerous and changing U.S. federal and foreign government regulations. Failure to comply with or substantial changes in government regulations could negatively affect our sales, increase our costs or result in fines or other penalties against us.
Each of our venues is subject to licensing and regulation by the health, sanitation, safety, labor, building environmental (including disposal, pollution, and the presence of hazardous substances) and fire agencies of the respective states, counties, cities, and municipalities in which it is located, as well as under federal law. These regulations govern the preparation and sale of food, the sale of alcoholic beverages, the sale and use of tobacco, zoning and building codes, land use and employee, health, sanitation and safety matters. Alcoholic beverage control regulations govern various aspects of our restaurants’ daily operations, including the minimum age of patrons and employees, hours of operation, advertising, wholesale purchasing and inventory control, handling and storage. Typically, our restaurants’ licenses to sell alcoholic beverages must be renewed annually and may be suspended or revoked at any time for cause. A failure to comply with one or more regulations could result in the imposition of sanctions, including the closing of venues for an indeterminate period of time, or third-party litigation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us and our results of operations.
Our foreign operations are subject to all of the same risks as our domestic restaurants and food and beverage hospitality services operations, and additional risks that include, among others, international economic and political conditions and the possibility of instability and unrest, differing cultures and consumer preferences, diverse government regulations and tax systems, the ability to source fresh ingredients and other commodities in a cost-effective manner and the availability of experienced management.
We are subject to governmental regulation in the domestic and international jurisdictions where we operate, including antitrust and tax requirements, anti-boycott regulations, import/export/customs regulations and other international trade regulations, the USA PATRIOT Act and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Any new regulatory or trade initiatives could impact our operations in certain countries. Failure to comply with any such legal requirements could subject us to monetary liabilities and other sanctions, which could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We may not be able to comply with certain debt covenants on our debt.
The revolving credit facility component of our credit agreement requires us to maintain compliance with a consolidated total net leverage ratio once we have drawn 35% of the revolving facility’s capacity. Our ability to comply with this covenant may be affected by events beyond our control. If we were to default under this covenant and such default was not cured or waived, our indebtedness could become immediately due and payable and our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Failure of our internal controls over financial reporting could harm our business and financial results.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that we would prevent or detect a misstatement of our financial statements or fraud. Any failure to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting could limit our ability to report our financial results accurately and timely or to detect and prevent fraud. A significant financial reporting failure or material weakness in internal control over financial reporting could cause a loss of investor confidence and decline in the market price of our stock.
We cannot be certain that we will be able to maintain adequate controls over our financial processes and reporting. Refer to Part II —Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for management’s assessment as of December 28, 2025. Any failure to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting could limit our ability to report our financial results accurately and timely or to detect and prevent fraud. A significant financial reporting failure or material weakness in internal control over financial reporting could cause a loss of investor confidence and decline in the market price of our stock, and we could be subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the SEC or Nasdaq.
18
Table of Contents
Insiders have substantial control over us, and they could delay or prevent a change in our corporate control even if our other stockholders wanted it to occur.
Our executive officers, directors, and principal stockholders hold a significant percentage of our outstanding common stock. Accordingly, these stockholders are able to control or have a significant impact on all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This could delay or prevent an outside party from acquiring or merging with us even if our other stockholders affirmed such action. In addition, such concentrated control may adversely affect the price of our common stock and sales by our insiders or affiliates, along with any other market transactions, could affect the market price of our common stock.
Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, our bylaws and Delaware law may inhibit a takeover of us, which could limit the price investors might be willing to pay in the future for our common stock and could entrench management.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our bylaws contain provisions that may discourage unsolicited takeover proposals that stockholders may consider to be in their best interests. Our Board of Directors (the “Board”) is divided into three classes, each of which generally serve for a term of three years with only one class of directors being elected each year. As a result, at a given annual meeting, only a minority of the Board may be considered for election. Since our staggered Board may prevent our stockholders from replacing a majority of our Board at any given annual meeting, it may entrench management and discourage unsolicited stockholder proposals that may be in the best interests of stockholders.
Moreover, our Board has the ability to designate the terms of and issue new series of preferred stock without stockholder approval. Under the terms of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, our Board may authorize and issue up to 10,000,000 shares of one or more series or class of preferred stock with rights superior to those of holders of common stock in terms of liquidation and dividend preference, voting and other rights. Currently 9,840,000 shares of preferred stock are available to authorize and issue. The issuance of preferred stock would reduce the relative rights of holders of common stock vis-à-vis the holders of preferred stock without the approval of the holders of common stock. In addition, to the extent that such preferred stock is convertible into shares of common stock, its issuance would result in a dilution of the percentage ownership of holders of common stock on a fully diluted basis. In addition, the issuance of a series of preferred stock could be used as a method of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control of our company.
We are also subject to the anti-takeover provisions under Delaware law, which could delay or prevent a change of control. Together, these provisions may make the removal of management more difficult and may discourage transactions that otherwise could involve a payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our securities.
The price of our common stock could be subject to volatility related or unrelated to our operations.
The trading price of our common stock could fluctuate significantly due to a number of factors, including market perception of our ability to meet our growth projections and expectations, quarterly operating results of other companies in the same industry, trading value in our common stock, changes in general conditions in the economy and the financial markets or other developments affecting our business and the business of others in the industry. In addition, the stock market itself is subject to extreme price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market price of securities issued by many companies for reasons related and unrelated to their operating performance and could have the same effect on our common stock.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 1C. Cybersecurity
Our enterprise risk management framework considers cybersecurity risk alongside other company risks as part of our overall risk assessment process. In the ordinary course of our business, we receive, process and use large amounts of data. Digital data is stored and backed up with third party partners. Maintaining the integrity and availability of our information technology systems and this information, as well as appropriate limitations on access and confidentiality of such information, is important to our operations and business strategy. We implemented a program designed to assess,
19
Table of Contents
identify and manage risks from potential unauthorized occurrences on or through our information technology systems that may result in adverse effects on the confidentiality and integrity of these systems and the data residing in them. With the exception of local point-of-sale solutions, we do not host any solutions on premise as all applications are software as a service.
The program is managed and monitored by a team led by our Chief Information Officer and includes mechanisms, controls, technologies, systems, policies and other processes designed to prevent or mitigate data loss, theft, misuse, or other security incidents or vulnerabilities affecting the systems and data residing in them. For example, we conduct risk-based penetration and vulnerability testing and ongoing risk assessments. We also conduct employee training on cyber and information security, among other topics. In addition, we consult with outside advisors and experts to assist with assessing, identifying, and managing cybersecurity risks and their impact on our risk environment. Lastly, we outsource to a cybersecurity firm all intrusion detection, intrusion prevention and system incident and event monitoring.
Our Chief Information Officer, who reports directly to the Chief Executive Officer and has over 25 years of experience managing information technology and cybersecurity matters, together with our third-party service providers, are responsible for assessing and managing cybersecurity risks. We consider cybersecurity, along with other significant risks that we face, within our overall enterprise risk management framework. In the last fiscal year, we have not identified any prior cybersecurity incidents that materially affected us, but we face certain ongoing risks from cybersecurity threats that, if realized, could materially affect us. Additional information on cybersecurity risks we face is discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” under the heading “Cybersecurity, Data Privacy and IT Systems.”
The Board of Directors, as a whole and at the committee level, has oversight for the most significant risks facing us and for our processes to identify, prioritize, assess, manage, and mitigate those risks. The Audit Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors, has been designated by our Board to oversee cybersecurity risks.The Audit Committee receives regular updates and reviews with management the implementation and effectiveness of the Company’s controls to monitor and mitigate cybersecurity risks.
20
Table of Contents
Item 2. Properties
We do not own any real property. Each of our “owned” restaurants operates in premises leased by its operating subsidiary. We do not have a direct ownership interest in restaurants we operate under a management agreement (“managed”), license agreement (“licensed”) or franchise agreement (“franchised”).
Our STK locations are as follows:
Type of
Venue Hotel/Casino/Special Venue Location Interest
STK Atlanta — Atlanta, Georgia Owned
STK Aventura — Aventura, Florida Owned
STK Bellevue — Bellevue, Washington Owned
STK Boston — Boston, Massachusetts Owned
STK Charlotte — Charlotte, North Carolina Owned
STK Chicago — Chicago, Illinois Owned
STK Dallas — Dallas, Texas Owned
STK Denver — Denver, Colorado Owned
STK Doha The Ritz-Carlton Doha, Qatar Licensed
STK Downtown (1) — New York, New York Owned (2)
STK Dubai Jumeirah Beach Residence Dubai, United Arab Emirates Licensed
STK Las Vegas The Cosmopolitan Las Vegas, Nevada Managed
STK London ME London London, England Managed
STK Los Cabos Los Cabos Airport Cabo San Lucas, Mexico Licensed
STK Miami Beach — Miami Beach, Florida Owned
STK Midtown — New York, New York Owned
STK Milan ME Milan Milan, Italy Managed
STK Nashville — Nashville, Tennessee Owned
STK Oak Brook — Oak Brook, Illinois Owned
STK Orlando (1) Disney Springs Orlando, Florida Owned
STK Salt Lake City — Salt Lake City, Utah Owned
STK San Diego (1) Andaz Hotel San Diego, California Owned
STK San Francisco — San Francisco, California Owned
STK San Juan Condado Vanderbilt Hotel San Juan, Puerto Rico Licensed
STK Scottsdale — Scottsdale, Arizona Owned
STK Stratford The Gantry London London, England Managed
STK Topanga — Los Angeles, California Owned
STK Toronto — Toronto, Canada Managed
STK Washington DC Marriot Marquis Washington, D.C. Owned
STK Westwood — Los Angeles, California Owned
(2) Ownership in location is 64.81%.
21
Table of Contents
Our Benihana locations are as follows:
Type of
Venue Location Interest
Benihana Addison Walk Dallas, Texas Owned
Benihana Alpharetta Alpharetta, Georgia Owned
Benihana Anaheim Anaheim, California Owned
Benihana Anchorage Anchorage, Alaska Owned
Benihana Atlanta I Atlanta, Georgia Owned
Benihana Express Bayside Miami, Florida Franchised
Benihana Beaverton Beaverton, Oregon Owned
Benihana Bethesda II Bethesda, Maryland Owned
Benihana Boca Raton Boca Raton, Florida Owned
Benihana Express Brickell Miami Miami, Florida Franchised
Benihana Broomfield Broomfield, Colorado Owned
Benihana Burlingame Burlingame, California Owned
Benihana Carlsbad Carlsbad, California Owned
Benihana Chandler Chandler, Arizona Owned
Benihana Cherry Hill Pennsauken, New Jersey Owned
Benihana Cincinnati I Cincinnati, Ohio Owned
Benihana Cleveland Cleveland, Ohio Owned
Benihana Columbus Columbus, Ohio Owned
Benihana Concord Concord, California Owned
Benihana Conroe Conroe, Texas Owned
Benihana Coral Gables Coral Gables, Florida Owned
Benihana Coral Springs Coral Springs, Florida Owned
Benihana Cupertino Cupertino, California Owned
Benihana Dallas Dallas, Texas Owned
Benihana Dearborn Dearborn, Michigan Owned
Benihana Denver Denver, Colorado Owned
Benihana Downey Downey, California Owned
Benihana Dulles Dulles, Virginia Owned
Benihana Edison Edison, New Jersey Franchised
Benihana Encino Encino, California Owned
Benihana Farmington Hills Northville, Michigan Owned
Benihana Ft. Lauderdale Lauderdale-by-the-Sea, Florida Owned
Benihana Hard Rock Stadium Miami Gardens, Florida Sports arena
Benihana Houston I Houston, Texas Owned
Benihana Houston II Houston, Texas Owned
Benihana Indianapolis Indianapolis, Indiana Owned
Benihana Jardim Europa Jardim Europa, Brazil Franchised
Benihana John Hancock Chicago, Illinois Owned
Benihana Key West Key West, Florida Franchised
Benihana Las Colinas Irving, Texas Owned
Benihana Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada Owned
Benihana Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada Franchised
Benihana Little Rock Little Rock, Arkansas Franchised
Benihana Lombard Lombard, Illinois Owned
Benihana Mall Of America Bloomington, Minnesota Owned
Benihana Manhasset Manhasset, New York Owned
Benihana Maple Grove Maple Grove, Minnesota Owned
Benihana Memphis Memphis, Tennessee Owned
Benihana Miami Beach North Bay Village, Florida Owned
Benihana Miami-Samurai Miami, Florida Owned
Benihana Milwaukee Milwaukee, Wisconsin Franchised
Benihana Minneapolis Golden Valley, Minnesota Owned
Benihana Miramar Miramar, Florida Owned
Benihana Monterey(1) Monterey, California Owned
22
Table of Contents
Benihana Newport Beach Newport Beach, California Owned
Benihana NY West New York, New York Owned
Benihana Ontario Ontario, California Owned
Benihana Orlando Orlando, Florida Owned
Benihana Orlando II Orlando, Florida Owned
Benihana Palm Beach Palm Beach, Aruba Franchised
Benihana Panama City Panama City, Panama Franchised
Benihana Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Owned
Benihana Plano Plano, Texas Owned
Benihana Plymouth Meeting Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania Owned
Benihana Puente Hills City of Industry, California Owned
Benihana Salt Lake City Salt Lake City, Utah Owned
Benihana San Diego San Diego, California Owned
Benihana San Francisco San Francisco, California Owned
Benihana San Mateo San Mateo, California Owned
Benihana San Salvador San Salvador, El Salvador Franchised
Benihana Santa Anita Arcadia, California Owned
Benihana Santa Monica Santa Monica, California Owned
Benihana Schaumburg Schaumburg, Illinois Owned
Benihana Scottsdale Scottsdale, Arizona Owned
Benihana Short Hills Short Hills, New Jersey Owned
Benihana Stuart Stuart, Florida Owned
Benihana Sugar Land Sugar Land, Texas Owned
Benihana Mortgage Matchup Center Phoenix, Arizona Sports arena
Benihana Temecula Temecula, California Owned
Benihana Torrance Torrance, California Owned
Benihana Troy Troy, Michigan Owned
Benihana UBS Arena Elmont, New York Sports arena
Benihana Westbury Westbury, New York Owned
Benihana Wheeling Wheeling, Illinois Owned
Benihana Woodlands The Woodlands, Texas Owned
Benihana Yankee Stadium New York, New York Sports arena
23
Table of Contents
Our Grill Concepts locations are as follows:
Type of
Venue Location Interest
Kona Grill Alpharetta Alpharetta, Georgia Owned
Kona Grill Baltimore(1) Baltimore, Maryland Owned
Kona Grill Boca Park Las Vegas, Nevada Owned
Kona Grill Boise Meridian, Idaho Owned
Kona Grill Carmel Carmel, Indiana Owned
Kona Grill Cincinnati Cincinnati, Ohio Owned
Kona Grill Columbus Columbus, Ohio Owned
Kona Grill Dallas Dallas, Texas Owned
Kona Grill Denver Denver, Colorado Owned
Kona Grill Desert Ridge Phoenix, Arizona Owned
Kona Grill Eden Prairie Eden Prairie, Minnesota Owned
Kona Grill El Paso El Paso, Texas Owned
Kona Grill Gilbert Gilbert, Arizona Owned
Kona Grill Huntsville Huntsville, Alabama Owned
Kona Grill Kansas City Kansas City, Missouri Owned
Kona Grill Landmark(2) San Antonio, Texas Owned
Kona Grill North Star San Antonio, Texas Owned
Kona Grill Oak Brook Oak Brook, Illinois Owned
Kona Grill Riverton(1) Riverton, Utah Owned
Kona Grill Tampa Tampa, Florida Owned
Kona Grill Tigard(1) Tigard, Oregon Owned
Kona Grill Troy Troy, Michigan Owned
Kona Grill Woodbridge Iselin, New Jersey Owned
RA Sushi Addison Dallas, Texas Owned
RA Sushi Chino Hills(1) Chino Hills, California Owned
RA Sushi Downtown Austin Austin, Texas Owned
RA Sushi Houston Houston, Texas Owned
RA Sushi Houston II Houston, Texas Owned
RA Sushi Leawood(1) Leawood, Kansas Owned
RA Sushi Mesa Mesa, Arizona Owned
RA Sushi North Scottsdale Scottsdale, Arizona Owned
RA Sushi Pembroke Pines Pembroke Pines, Florida Owned
RA Sushi Plantation Walk Plantation, Florida Owned
RA Sushi Times Square New York, New York Owned
RA Sushi Tucson Tucson, Arizona Owned
(1) Temporarily closed for conversion
(2) Opened in January 2026
24
Table of Contents
Our ONE Hospitality brands and F&B services locations are as follows:
Type of
Venue Hotel/Casino/Special Venue Location Interest
F&B Services - Hippodrome Hippodrome Casino London, England Managed(1)
F&B Services - ME Milan ME Milan Milan, Italy Managed
Heliot Hippodrome Casino London, England Managed(1)
Radio Rooftop Bar ME Milan Milan, Italy Managed
Rivershore Bar & Grill Rivershore BW Plus Oregon City, Oregon Managed
Salt Water Social — Denver, Colorado Owned
(1) Management services consulting agreement
In addition to the locations above, we lease office space for support offices in Denver, Colorado; New York, New York; Scottsdale, Arizona; Aventura, Florida; and London, England.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are subject to claims common to our industry and in the ordinary course of our business. Companies in our industry, including us, have been and are subject to class action lawsuits, primarily regarding compliance with labor laws and regulations. Defending lawsuits requires significant management attention and financial resources and the outcome of any litigation is inherently uncertain. We believe that accruals for these matters are adequately provided for in our consolidated financial statements. We may have to make payments from time to time to settle or resolve legal matters. We do not believe the ultimate resolutions of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and results of operations. However, the resolution of lawsuits is difficult to predict. A significant increase in the number of these claims, or one or more successful claims under which we incur greater liabilities than is currently anticipated, could materially and adversely affect our consolidated financial statements.
For information regarding litigation refer to Note 17. “Commitments and Contingencies” in our consolidated financial statements included in Item 15. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” For more information about the impact of legal proceedings in our business, see Item 1A. “Risk Factors”.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
25
Table of Contents
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol "STKS". As of February 28, 2026, there were 63 holders of record of our common stock. This does not include persons whose stock is in nominee or “street name” accounts through brokers.
Dividends
We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividend in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends, if any, is within the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our earnings, our capital requirements, compliance with debt covenants, overall financial condition and such other factors as the Board of Directors may consider. As a Delaware corporation, we are also limited by Delaware law as to the payment of dividends. We currently intend to retain our earnings to finance our growth.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
In September 2022, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a repurchase program of up to $10.0 million of outstanding common stock and in May 2023 authorized an additional $5.0 million of repurchases. The Company completed the repurchase of $15.0 million shares of common stock by December 2023. In March 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an additional $5.0 million of repurchases under the repurchase program.
During 2025 and 2024, the Company purchased 0.4 million and 0.7 million shares of common stock for aggregate consideration of $1.1 million and $3.2 million, respectively. As of December 28, 2025, the Company had repurchased 3.4 million shares for $19.3 million under the program. During the fourth quarter of 2025, there was no share repurchase activity.
Item 6. [Reserved]
26
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following management’s discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes to those statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
We currently own, operate, manage, license or franchise 158 venues including 31 STKs, 86 Benihanas, 23 Kona Grills and 12 RA Sushis in major metropolitan cities in North America, Europe and the Middle East and 6 F&B venues in three hotels and casinos in the United States and Europe.
We opened the following seven new venues in 2025:
● Owned Benihana restaurant in San Mateo, California
● Owned STK restaurant in Canoga Park, California
● Franchised Benihana Express restaurant in Miami, Florida
● Owned STK restaurant in Oak Brook, Illinois
● Sports arena Benihana restaurant at the UBS Arena in Elmont, New York
In January 2026, we opened a Company-owned Kona Grill restaurant in San Antonio, Texas, a relocation of an existing Kona Grill restaurant.
In February 2026, we converted a franchised Benihana restaurant to a Company-owned Benihana restaurant in Monterey, California.
We intend to add six to ten new venues in 2026.
There are currently two Company-owned STK restaurants and two Company-owned Benihana restaurants under construction in the following cities:
● Owned STK restaurant in Phoenix, Arizona
● Owned Benihana restaurant in San Jose, California
● Owned Benihana restaurant in Seattle, Washington
27
Table of Contents
The table below reflects our venues by restaurant brand and geographic location:
Venues
Domestic
Sports arena(4) — 4 — — 4
Managed 1 — — 1 2
Licensed 1 — — — 1
Franchised — 7 — — 7
International
Owned — — — — —
Sports arena(4) — — — — —
Managed 4 — — 4 8
Licensed 4 — — — 4
Franchised — 4 — — 4
Total international 8 4 — 4 16
(2) Includes five temporarily closed venues.
During 2024 and 2025, we completed a comprehensive review of our Grill Concepts portfolio and made the strategic decision to close or convert several locations. As part of this initiative, we closed four Kona Grill restaurants and two RA Sushi restaurants in 2025. Additionally, we closed one RA Sushi restaurant in January 2026.
In addition, during the first quarter of 2025, we exited two Benihana restaurants in sports arenas. In the second quarter of 2025, a management agreement for one STK restaurant and an operating agreement at The W Hotel were terminated. A ONE Hospitality venue was closed during the second quarter of 2025. In the third quarter of 2025, we terminated a license agreement for one STK restaurant and closed one RA Sushi restaurant. We converted a RA Sushi restaurant to a STK restaurant during the fourth quarter of 2025. We plan to convert up to an additional nine Company-owned Grill restaurants to Benihana or STK formats, with five that are expected to be converted by the end of 2026.
2025 Financial Highlights
Total revenue increased $132.4 million, or 19.7% to $805.7 million for 2025 compared to $673.3 million for 2024 primarily attributable to our acquisition of 100% of the issued and outstanding equity interests of Safflower Holdings Corp. from Safflower Holdings LLC on May 1, 2024 (the “Benihana Acquisition”) partially offset by the fiscal calendar change that shifted New Year’s Eve to 2026 and four less days in 2025 compared to 2024.
Same store sales for 2025 compared to 2024 were as follows:
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 YTD
US STK Owned Restaurants (2.3)% (4.9)% (6.2)% (0.7)% (3.4)%
US STK Managed Restaurants (12.7)% (9.5)% (4.7)% 4.2% (4.6)%
US STK Total Restaurants (3.6)% (6.0)% (5.8)% 0.3% (3.7)%
Benihana Owned Restaurants 0.7% 0.4% (4.0)% (0.4)% (0.8)%
Combined Same Store Sales (3.2)% (4.1)% (5.9)% (1.8)% (3.7)%
28
Table of Contents
Operating income decreased $0.9 million to $8.0 million for 2025 from $8.9 million for 2024 primarily due to the decrease in the transaction costs related to the Benihana Acquisition and the additional operating income from a full year of the acquired restaurants from the Benihana acquisition partially offset by the loss on impairment of non-current assets.
Restaurant operating profit increased $19.5 million, or 18.1%, to $127.1 million for 2025 compared to $107.6 million in 2024. Restaurant operating profit as a percentage of owned restaurant net revenue, excluding Grill Concepts locations closed or to be closed, was 16.6% in 2025 compared to 17.5% in 2024. See “Results of Operations” below for a reconciliation of Operating income (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP measure to restaurant operating profit and a reconciliation of Owned restaurant net revenue, the most directly comparable GAAP measure to owned restaurant net revenue, excluding Grill Concepts locations closed or to be closed.
Net loss attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. was $92.2 million in 2025 compared to net income of $17.1 million in 2024, primarily due to the non-cash tax valuation allowance that was recorded during the third quarter of 2025.
Our Growth Strategies and Outlook
Our growth model is primarily driven by the following:
Expansion of STK. We expect to continue to expand our operations domestically and internationally through a mix of owned, licensed and managed STK restaurants using a disciplined and targeted site selection process. We have identified over 75 additional major metropolitan areas across the globe where we expect we could grow our STK brand to 200 restaurants over the foreseeable future. We expect to open three to five STKs annually, primarily through Company-owned locations and management or licensing agreements, provided that we have sufficient interest from prospective licensees, acceptable locations and quality restaurant managers available to support that pace of growth.
In 2025, we opened Company-owned STK restaurants in Los Angeles, California, Canoga Park, California and Oak Brook, Illinois. We converted a Company-owned RA Sushi restaurant to a Company-owned STK restaurant in Scottsdale, Arizona. Additionally, we have three STK restaurants in Phoenix, Arizona, New York, New York and White Plains, New York under construction and several restaurants in the development phase or under lease that we plan to open in 2026 or 2027.
In 2024, we opened Company-owned STK restaurants in Washington, D.C. and Aventura, Florida. We also opened one licensed STK restaurant in Ontario, Canada.
Expansion of Benihana. We expect to expand our operations domestically and internationally through a mix of owned and franchised Benihana restaurants using a disciplined and targeted site selection process. We believe we could grow the Benihana brand to 400 restaurants over the foreseeable future. We expect to open three to five Benihanas annually, primarily through Company-owned locations and franchising agreements, provided that we have sufficient interest from prospective franchisees, acceptable locations and quality restaurant managers available to support that pace of growth.
In 2025, we opened Company-owned Benihana restaurants in San Mateo, California and at the UBS Arena in Elmont, New York. We also opened one franchised Benihana Express location in Miami, Florida. Additionally, we currently have two Benihana restaurants in San Jose, California and Seattle, Washington under construction and several restaurants in the development phase or under lease we plan to open in 2026 or 2027.
In December 2025, we entered into our largest asset-light development agreement in our history by securing development rights for a total of ten restaurants, either Benihana or Benihana Express locations, throughout the Greater San Francisco Bay Area with an experienced operator. We expect this agreement will significantly accelerate our West Coast expansion while maintaining our focus on capital-efficient growth.
Increase Same Store Sales and Increase Our Operating Efficiency. In addition to expanding into new cities and hospitality venues, we intend to continue to increase revenue and profits in our existing operations through continued focus on high-quality, high-margin food and beverage menu items. We believe that our operating margins will improve through growth in same store sales, as defined below in Key Performance Indicators, and a reduction of store-level operating expenses.
29
Table of Contents
Acquisitions. We continue to evaluate potential acquisition opportunities.
As our footprint increases, we expect to benefit by leveraging system-wide operating efficiencies and best practices through the management of our general and administrative expenses as a percentage of overall revenue.
Key Performance Indicators
We use the following key performance indicators in evaluating our restaurants and assessing our business:
Same Store Sales (“SSS”). SSS represents total food and beverage sales at domestic owned and managed restaurants opened for at least a full 24-month period at the beginning of each quarter, which removes the impact of new restaurant openings in comparing the operations of existing restaurants. For STK SSS, this measure includes total revenue from our owned and managed domestic STK locations. Revenues from locations where we do not directly control the event sales force are excluded from this measure.
Our comparable restaurant base for STK SSS consisted of thirteen domestic restaurants for the year ended December 28, 2025. For Benihana SSS, sixty-eight domestic restaurants are included in the comparable restaurant base. For Grill Concepts SSS, thirty-four domestic restaurants are included in the comparable restaurant base. STK, Benihana and Grill Concepts SSS decreased 3.7%, 0.8% and 12.5%, respectively, for 2025 compared to the prior year.
Number of Restaurant Openings. Number of restaurant openings reflects the number of restaurants opened during a particular fiscal period. For each restaurant opening, we incur pre-opening expenses, which are defined below. Typically, new restaurants open with an initial start-up period of higher than normalized sales volumes (also referred to in the restaurant industry as the “honeymoon” period), which decrease to a steady level approximately 24 months after opening. However, operating costs during this initial period are also higher than normal, resulting in restaurant operating margins that are generally lower during the start-up period of operation and increase to a steady level approximately 24 months after opening. Some new restaurants may experience a “honeymoon” period that is either shorter or longer than this time frame.
In 2025, we opened three Company-owned STK restaurants in Los Angeles, California, Canoga Park, California and Oak Brook, California. We converted a Company-owned RA Sushi restaurant to a Company-owned STK restaurant in Scottsdale, Arizona. We opened Company-owned Benihana restaurants in San Mateo, California and at the UBS Arena in Elmont, New York. We also opened one franchised Benihana Express location in Miami, Florida.
Average Check Per Person. Average check per person is calculated by dividing total restaurant sales by total number of guests for a specified period. Our management team uses these indicators at STK to analyze trends in customers’ preferences, customer expenditures and the overall effectiveness of menu changes and price increases. For our comparable STK restaurants, the average check per person was $129 for 2025 compared to $127 for 2024.
Average Transaction. Average transaction is calculated by dividing total restaurant sales by total number of transactions for a specified period. Our management team uses these indicators at Benihana and Grill Concepts to analyze trends in customers’ preferences, customer expenditures and the overall effectiveness of menu changes and price increases. The average transaction for comparable Benihana restaurants was $116 in 2025 compared to $111 for 2024. The average transaction was $64 for our comparable Grill Concepts restaurants in both 2025 and 2024.
Average Comparable Restaurant Revenue. Average comparable restaurant revenue consists of the average sales of our comparable restaurants over a certain period of time. This measure is calculated by dividing total comparable restaurant sales in a given period by the total number of comparable restaurants in that period. For purposes of this calculation, STK Downtown restaurant and rooftop are considered a single venue. This indicator assists management in measuring changes in customer traffic, pricing and development of our brand. Our average comparable STK restaurant revenues were $14.2 million and $15.5 million for 2025 and 2024, respectively. For 2025, our average comparable Benihana restaurant revenues were $6.3 million compared to $6.5 million for 2024. Our average comparable Grill Concepts restaurant revenues were $3.6 million and $3.9 million for 2025 and 2024, respectively.
30
Table of Contents
Key Financial Terms and Metrics
We evaluate our business using a variety of key financial measures:
Segment reporting
Our reportable operating segments are as follows:
See Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements for further information on our segment reporting.
Revenues
Owned restaurant net revenues. Owned restaurant net revenues consist of food and beverage sales by owned restaurants net of any discounts associated with each sale and of any ancillary F&B hospitality services at owned locations. Additionally, revenues from offsite banquets and our gift card programs are included in owned restaurant net revenues. For the year ended December 28, 2025, in-venue beverage sales comprised 17% of food and beverage sales, and in-venue food sales comprised the remaining 83%. This indicator assists management in understanding the trends in gross margins of the restaurants.
Our primary owned restaurant brands are STK, Benihana, Kona Grill and RA Sushi. We specifically look at comparable sales from both owned and managed restaurants to understand customer count trends and changes in average check per person or average transaction as it relates to our primary restaurant brands.
Management, license, franchise and incentive fee revenue. Management, license, franchise and incentive fee revenues include fees received pursuant to management and license agreements. Management agreements typically call for a management fee based on a percentage of revenue, a monthly marketing fee based on a percentage of revenues and an incentive fee based on a managed venue’s net profits. Similarly, royalties from the licensee or franchisee in license and franchise agreements are generally based on a percentage of the licensed or franchised restaurant’s revenue. These management, license, franchise and incentive fees are recognized as revenue in the period the restaurant’s sales occur. Initial licensing fees, franchising fees and upfront fees related to management, license, and franchise agreements are recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the agreement.
We evaluate the performance of our managed, licensed and franchised properties based on sales growth, a key driver for management, license, franchise and incentive fees, and on improvements in operating profitability margins, which, combined with sales, drives incentive fee growth.
Cost and expenses
Owned restaurant cost of sales. Owned restaurant cost of sales includes all owned restaurant food and beverage expenditures. We measure cost of goods as a percentage of owned restaurant net revenues. Owned restaurant cost of sales are generally influenced by the cost of food and beverage items, menu mix, discounting activity and restaurant level controls. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors — Increases in commodity prices would adversely affect our results of operations.”
Owned restaurant operating expenses. We measure owned restaurant operating expenses as a percentage of owned restaurant net revenues. Fixed cost leveraging (deleveraging) represents the cost of owned restaurant operating expenses as a percentage of owned restaurant net revenues, in which an increase (decrease) in revenue would cause a decrease (increase) in the cost of owned restaurant operating expenses as a percentage of owned restaurant net revenues.
Owned restaurant operating expenses include the following:
31
Table of Contents
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses are comprised of all corporate overhead expenses, including payroll and related benefits, stock-based compensation expense, professional fees, such as legal and accounting fees, insurance and travel expenses. Certain centrally managed general and administrative expenses are allocated specifically to restaurant locations and are reflected in owned restaurant operating expenses and include shared services such as reservations, events and marketing. We expect general and administrative expenses to be leveraged as we grow, become more efficient, and continue to focus on best practices and cost savings measures.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense consists principally of charges related to the depreciation of fixed assets including leasehold improvements, equipment and furniture and fixtures and loss on disposal of fixed assets.
Transition and integration expenses. Transition and integration expenses consist of costs associated with the Benihana Acquisition. These costs are expenses related to the implementation of happy hour and wagyu offerings at Benihana and identified duplicate professional service vendors, operational support offices, support positions, and maintenance expenses that will be eliminated in the foreseeable future.
Lease termination and exit expenses. Lease termination and exit expenses consist of costs incurred in connection with a closed restaurant or restaurants to be closed. Lease termination and exit expenses can include costs associated exiting a lease agreement, accelerated depreciation on property and equipment and impairment of non-current assets.
Pre-opening expenses. Pre-opening expenses consist of costs incurred prior to opening an owned or managed restaurant at either a leased or F&B location. Pre-opening expenses are comprised principally of manager salaries and relocation costs, employee payroll, training costs for new employees and lease costs incurred prior to opening. Pre-opening expenses also include payroll and travel costs associated with our new restaurant opening training team. Pre-opening expenses have varied from location to location depending on a number of factors, including the proximity to our existing restaurants; the amount of rent expensed during the construction and in-restaurant training periods; the size and physical layout of each location; the number of management and hourly employees required to operate each restaurant; the relative difficulty of the restaurant staffing process; the cost of travel and lodging for different metropolitan areas; the timing of the restaurant opening; and the extent of unexpected delays, if any, in obtaining necessary licenses and permits to open the restaurant.
32
Table of Contents
Transaction and exit costs. Transaction and exit costs primarily represent investment banking, legal and professional fees incurred in conjunction with the Benihana Acquisition.
Other Items
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Restaurant Operating Profit. We presentEBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Restaurant Operating Profit to supplement other measures of financial performance. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Restaurant Operating Profit are not required by, or presented in accordance with, accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). We define EBITDA as net income before interest expense, benefit for income taxes and depreciation and amortization. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income before interest expense, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, non-cash impairment loss, non-cash rent expense, non-recurring gains and losses, stock-based compensation, lease termination and exit expenses, certain transactional and exit costs, transition and integration expenses, loss on early debt extinguishment and the Adjusted EBITDA attributable to Grill Concept restaurants closed or to be closed. Not all of the items defining Adjusted EBITDA occur in each reporting period but have been included in our definitions of these terms based on our historical activity. We define Restaurant Operating Profit as owned restaurant net revenue minus owned restaurant cost of sales and owned restaurant operating expenses.
We believe that EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Restaurant Operating Profit are appropriate measures of our operating performance because they eliminate non-cash or non-recurring expenses that do not reflect our underlying business performance. We believe Restaurant Operating Profit is an important component of financial results because: (i) it is a widely used metric within the restaurant industry to evaluate restaurant-level productivity, efficiency, and performance, and (ii) we use Restaurant Operating Profit as a key metric to evaluate our restaurant financial performance compared to our competitors. We use these metrics to facilitate a comparison of our operating performance on a consistent basis from period to period, to analyze the factors and trends affecting our business and to evaluate the performance of our restaurants. Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to that reported by other companies; accordingly, you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA is a key measure used by management and is a metric used in our debt compliance calculation. Additionally, Adjusted EBITDA and Restaurant Operating Profit are frequently used by analysts, investors and other interested parties to evaluate companies in our industry. We use Adjusted EBITDA and Restaurant Operating Profit, alongside other GAAP measures such as net income, to measure profitability, as a key profitability target in our budgets, and to compare our performance against that of peer companies despite possible differences in calculation.
Please refer to the table on page 36 for our reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA and for a reconciliation of operating income to Restaurant Operating Profit.
33
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain statements of operations data for the periods indicated (in thousands):
For the year ended December 28, For the year ended December 31,
Revenues:
Management, license, franchise and incentive fee revenue 13,960 14,429
Cost and expenses:
Owned operating expenses:
Depreciation and amortization 43,192 34,096
Transition and integration expenses 11,202 13,681
Loss on impairment of non-current assets 10,610 —
Lease termination and exit expenses 7,949 1,567
Transaction and exit costs 256 8,855
Other (income) expenses (418) 124
Other expenses, net:
Interest expense, net of interest income 40,902 31,109
Loss on early debt extinguishment — 4,149
Loss before provision (benefit) for income taxes (32,901) (26,361)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes 60,684 (8,434)
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest (1,344) (829)
34
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth certain statements of operations data as a percentage of total revenues for the periods indicated. Certain percentage amounts may not sum to total due to rounding.
For the year ended December 28, For the year ended December 31,
Revenues:
Owned restaurant net revenue 98.3% 97.9%
Management, license, franchise and incentive fee revenue 1.7% 2.1%
Cost and expenses:
Owned operating expenses:
Owned restaurant cost of sales(1) 20.7% 21.1%
Owned restaurant operating expenses(1) 63.5% 62.8%