Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

STC US Equity

Stewart Information Services CorpFinancials · Title Insurance · CIK 94344 · FY ends Dec 31
$69.20
+0.24 (+0.35%)
USD · as of 2026-08-21 · marketstack

STC · 10-K · period ended 2020-12-31

← all STC documents
filed 2021-03-01 · EDGAR original ↗

Our rendering of the filing — original pagination and typography are not reproduced, and tables are reduced to their short label cells (the figures live on FA). Nothing is summarized: every line below is the filing's own text.

blocks 1600 of 928207k characters rendered

stc-20201231

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2020

For the transition period fromto

Commission file number001-02658

STEWART INFORMATION SERVICES CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (713) 625-8100

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, $1 par value per share STC New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐No☑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit). Yes☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☑

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☑

The aggregate market value of the Common Stock (based upon the closing sales price of the Common Stock of Stewart Information Services Corporation, as reported by the NYSE on June 30, 2020) held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $752.2 million.

On February 19, 2021, there were 26,752,903 outstanding shares of the Registrant's Common Stock.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Portions of the definitive proxy statement (the Proxy Statement), in connection with the Registrant's 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, are incorporated herein by reference in Part III of this document.

FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item Page

PART I

1 Business 1

1A. Risk Factors 6

1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 11

3 Legal Proceedings 11

4 Mine Safety Disclosures 11

PART II

7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 28

8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 29

9A. Controls and Procedures 30

9B. Other Information 30

PART III

10 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 31

11 Executive Compensation 31

13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 32

14 Principal Accountant Fees and Services 32

PART IV

15 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 33

Signatures 36

As used in this report, “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” and “Stewart” mean Stewart Information Services Corporation and our subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.

PART I

Item 1. Business

Established in 1893, Stewart Information Services Corporation (NYSE:STC) is a global customer-driven, technology-enabled, strategically competitive, real estate information, title insurance and transaction management company headquartered in Houston, Texas. Stewart is one of the largest title companies in the industry and, through a network of owned operations and independent title agencies, provides title insurance and related information services required for settlement by the real estate and mortgage industries. Stewart operates primarily throughout the United States (U.S.) and has regional offices in Australia, Canada, the Caribbean, Europe, Mexico and the United Kingdom. Stewart also provides appraisal management services; search and valuation services; online notarization and closing services, loan origination, default and servicing support; home and personal insurance services; tax-deferred exchanges; and technology to streamline the real estate process.

We currently report our business in two segments: title insurance and related services (title), and ancillary services and corporate. Refer to Note 19 to our audited consolidated financial statements and Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) for financial information related to our segments.

Title Segment

Title insurance and related services include the functions of searching, examining, closing and insuring the condition of the title to real property. The title segment also includes home and personal insurance services and Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 tax-deferred (Section 1031) exchanges.

Examination and closing. The purpose of a title examination is to ascertain the ownership of the property being transferred, debts that are owed on it and the scope of the title policy coverage. This involves searching for and examining documents such as deeds, mortgages, wills, divorce decrees, court judgments, liens, assessments and tax records.

At the closing or settlement of a sale transaction, the seller executes and delivers a deed to the new owner. The buyer typically signs new mortgage documents and closing funds are disbursed to the seller, the prior lender, real estate brokers, the title company and others. The documents are then recorded in the public records. A title insurance policy is generally issued to both the new lender and the owner at the closing of the transaction.

At the closing or settlement of a refinance transaction, the borrower executes and delivers a mortgage or deed of trust to the lender. The borrower typically signs the mortgage documents and closing funds are ordinarily disbursed to the prior lender, the title company and others. The documents are then recorded in the public records. A title insurance policy is generally issued to the new lender at the closing or recording of the transaction.

Title insurance policies. Lenders in the United States generally require title insurance as a condition to making a loan on real estate, including securitized lending, as this assures lenders of the priority of their lien position on the real estate property. Also, the purchasers of the real estate property want insurance to protect against claims that may arise against the title to the property. The face amount of the owner's policy is normally the purchase price in a purchase transaction, while the face amount of the lender's policy is the amount of the related loan when financing is involved in either purchase or refinance transaction.

1

Title insurance is substantially different from other types of insurance. Fire, auto, health and life insurance policies protect against future losses and events. In contrast, title insurance insures against losses from past events and seeks to protect the policyholder or lender by eliminating covered risks through the examination and settlement process. In essence, subject to its exceptions and exclusions, a title insurance policy provides a warranty to the policyholder that the title to the property is free from defects that might impair ownership rights, or in the case of a lender's policy, that there is priority of lien position. Most other forms of insurance provide protection for a limited period of time and, hence the policy must be periodically renewed. Title insurance, however, is issued for a one-time premium and the policy provides protection for as long as the owner owns the property, or has liability in connection with the property, or a lender under its policy has its insured lien on the property. Also, a title insurance policy does not have a finite contract term, whereas most other lines of insurance have definite beginning and ending dates for coverage. Although a title insurance policy provides protection for as long as the owner owns the property being covered, the title insurance company generally does not have information about which policies are still effective. Most other lines of insurance receive periodic premium payments and policy renewals thereby allowing the insurance company to know which policies are effective. In certain circumstances outside the U.S. and Canada, we may provide coverage against certain known risks after analyzing the underwriting risks.

Losses. Losses on policies occur when a title defect is not discovered during the examination and settlement process. Reasons for losses include, but are not limited to, forgeries, misrepresentations, unrecorded or undiscovered liens, the failure to pay off existing liens, mortgage lending fraud, mishandling or defalcation of settlement funds, issuance by independent agencies of unauthorized coverage and defending policyholders when covered claims are filed against an owner's or lender's interest in the property. Losses may also occur for coverage we may provide under Closing Protection Letters.

Some claimants seek damages in excess of policy limits. Those claims are based on various legal theories. We vigorously defend against spurious claims and provide protection for covered claims up to the limits set forth in the policy. We have from time-to-time incurred losses in excess of policy limits. Experience shows that most policy claims and claim payments are made in the first six years after the policy has been issued, although claims can also be reported and paid many years later. By their nature, claims are often complex, vary greatly in dollar amounts and are affected by economic and market conditions and the legal environment existing at the time claims are processed.

Our liability for estimated title losses comprises estimates of both known claims and incurred but unreported claims expected to be paid in the future for policies issued as of the balance sheet date. The amount of our loss reserve represents the aggregate future payments (net of recoveries) that we expect to make on policy losses and in costs to settle claims. In accordance with industry practice, these amounts have not been discounted to their present values. Estimating future title loss payments is difficult due to the complex nature of title claims, the length of time over which claims are paid, the significant variance in dollar amounts of individual claims and other factors. The amounts provided for policy losses are based on reported claims, historical loss payment experience, title industry averages and the current legal and economic environment. Estimated provisions for current year policy losses are charged to income in the same year the related premium revenues are recognized. Annual provisions for policy losses also include changes in the estimated aggregate liability on policies issued in prior years.

Amounts shown as our estimated liability for future loss payments are continually reviewed by us for reasonableness and adjusted as appropriate. We have consistently followed the same basic method of estimating and recording our loss reserves for more than 30 years. As part of our process, we also obtain input from third-party actuaries regarding our methodology and resulting reserve calculations. While we are responsible for determining our loss reserves, we utilize this actuarial input to assess the overall reasonableness of our estimated reserves.

See Critical Accounting Estimates - Title Loss Reserves under Item 7 - MD&A for information on current year policy losses and consolidated balance sheet reserves.

2

Factors affecting revenues. Title insurance revenues are closely related to the level of activity in the real estate markets we serve and the prices at which real estate sales are made. Real estate sales are directly affected by the availability and cost of money to finance purchases. Other factors include consumer confidence, demand by buyers, foreign currency exchange rates and weather. In periods of low interest rates, loan refinancing transactions are also an important contributor to revenues. These factors may override the seasonal nature of the title business. Generally, our first quarter is the least active and our second and third quarters are the most active in terms of title insurance revenues. Refer to Item 7 - MD&A, Results of Operations - Industry Data for comparative information on home sales, mortgage interest rates and loan activity, and Critical Accounting Estimates - Factors Affecting Revenues for additional details on principal factors affecting revenues.

Customers. The primary sources of title insurance business are attorneys, builders, developers, home buyers and home sellers, lenders, mortgage brokers, and real estate brokers and agents. No individual customer was responsible for as much as 10% or more of our consolidated revenues in any of the last three years. Titles insured include residential and various asset classes of commercial properties, including but not limited to, office, hotel, multi-family, industrial, retail, undeveloped acreage, farms, ranches, wind and solar power installations and other energy-related projects.

Service, location, financial strength, company size and related factors affect customer orders. Increasing market share is accomplished primarily by providing superior service. The parties to a closing are concerned with accuracy, timeliness and cost. The rates charged to customers are regulated, to varying degrees and in different ways, in most states.

The financial strength and stability of the title underwriter are important factors in maintaining and increasing our business, particularly commercial business. We are rated as investment grade by the title industry’s leading rating companies. Our wholly owned and principal underwriter, Stewart Title Guaranty Company (Guaranty), is currently rated “A Double Prime” by Demotech Inc., "A-" by Fitch Ratings Ltd., and "A- " by A.M. Best. Similarly, our wholly owned and second largest underwriter, Stewart Title Insurance Company (STIC), is also highly rated by such rating companies. These ratings are not credit ratings. Instead, the ratings are based on quantitative, and in some cases qualitative, information and reflect the conclusions of the rating agencies with respect to our financial strength, results of operations and ability to pay policyholder claims.

Market share. Title insurance statistics are compiled quarterly by the title industry’s national trade association. Based on 2020 unconsolidated statutory net premiums written through September 30, 2020, Guaranty is one of the leading title insurers in the United States.

Our largest competitors are Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF), whose principal underwriters are Chicago Title Insurance Company, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company and Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company; First American Financial Corporation (First American), which includes First American Title Insurance Company; and Old Republic Title Insurance Group (Old Republic), which includes Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. We also compete with other title insurer companies, as well as abstractors, attorneys who issue title opinions and attorney-owned title insurance funds. A number of homebuilders, financial institutions, real estate brokers and others own or control title insurance agencies, some of which issue policies underwritten by Guaranty.

During 2020, we acquired a number of title offices in the states of Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, Ohio and Texas, consistent with our investment and growth strategy of focusing on attractive businesses and geographies where we can have sustained success and where additional scale can efficiently and effectively improve profitability and margins. These acquisitions realign Stewart to strongly compete in several strategic markets where we have traditionally been underrepresented. In January 2021, we established a new underwriter, Stewart Title Europe Limited, in Malta to allow us to continue supporting our customers and underwriting contacts across Europe.

Refer to "Title revenues by geographic location" within the Results of Operations discussion under Item 7 - MD&A for the breakdown of title revenues by major geographic location.

Regulations. Title insurance companies are subject to comprehensive state regulations covering premium rates, agency licensing, policy forms, trade practices, reserve requirements, investments and the transfer of funds between an insurer and its parent or its subsidiaries and any similar related party transactions. Kickbacks and similar practices are prohibited by most state and federal laws. See Item 1A - Risk Factors: Our Insurance Subsidiaries Must Comply With Extensive Government Regulations.

3

Ancillary Services and Corporate Segment

The ancillary services and corporate segment is comprised of the parent holding company, our centralized administrative services departments and our ancillary services operations. Our ancillary services operations support the mortgage industry by primarily providing appraisal management services, search and valuation services, and online notarization and closing solutions. We provide these services through Stewart Lender Services, Inc., and through the companies we acquired in 2020 namely, United States Appraisals, LLC, Pro-Teck Services Ltd., and NotaryCam, Inc. Our recent acquisitions allow us to expand our existing search and valuation service offerings and serve our entire customer base better by increasing our appraisal footprint and enabling innovation and modernization during the real estate settlement process.

Factors affecting ancillary services revenues. As in the title segment, ancillary services revenues are closely related to the level of activity in the real estate market, which includes the volume of new or refinancing originations, as well as loan delinquencies and defaults. Companies that compete with our ancillary services businesses vary across a wide range of industries and include the major title insurance underwriters mentioned under “Title Segment - Market share” as well as other title agents and real estate technology and business process outsourcing providers.

Customers. Customers for our ancillary services products and services primarily include mortgage lenders and servicers, mortgage brokers and mortgage investors. Many of the services and products offered by our ancillary services business are used by professionals and intermediaries who have been retained to assist consumers with the sale, purchase, mortgage, transfer, recording and servicing of real estate transactions. To that end, timely, accurate and compliant services are critical to our customers since these factors directly affect the service they provide to their customers. Financial strength, scale, robust processes to ensure legal and regulatory compliance, marketplace presence and reputation as a reliable, compliant solution are important factors in attracting new business.

General

Investment policies. Our investment portfolios primarily reside in Guaranty and STIC, both of which are domestic underwriters, and two of our other international regulated insurance underwriters. These underwriters maintain investments in accordance with certain statutory requirements for the funding of premium reserves and deposits, or, in the case of our international operations, for the maintenance of certain capital ratios required by regulators. The activities of the portfolios are overseen by investment committees comprised of certain senior executives. Their oversight includes such activities as policy setting, determining appropriate asset classes with different and distinct risk/return profiles so as to prudently diversify the portfolio, and approving and managing service vendors (investment managers and custodians). We also utilize the expertise of third-party investment advisors to maximize returns while managing risk. Our investment policies are designed to comply with regulatory requirements as applicable law imposes restrictions upon the types and amounts of investments that may be made by our regulated insurance subsidiaries. Further, our investment policies require that investments are managed with a view to balancing profitability, liquidity, and risk (interest rate risk, credit risk, currency rate risk and liquidity risk) and consideration of negative impacts to earnings per share and income taxes.

As of December 31, 2020, approximately 92% of our combined debt and equity securities investment portfolios consisted of fixed income securities. As of that date, approximately 91% of the fixed income investments are held in securities that are A-rated or higher, and substantially all of the fixed income portfolios are rated investment grade (percentages are based on the fair value of the securities). In addition to our debt and equity securities investment portfolios, we maintain certain money-market and other short-term investments. For more details on market risks related to our investment securities portfolio, refer to Part II, Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Trademarks. We have developed and acquired numerous automated products and processes that are crucial to both our title and ancillary services operations. These systems automate most facets of the real estate transaction. Among these trademarked products and processes are AIM+®, AgencySecure®, PropertyInfo®, SureClose®, TitleSearch®, eTitleSearch®, Virtual Underwriter®, StewartNow® and NotaryCam®. We consider these trademarks, which can be renewed every ten years, to be important to our business.

4

Human capital resources. As of December 31, 2020, we employed approximately 5,800 people, with approximately 5,200 employees located in the U. S. and approximately 600 employees located internationally. We consider our relationship with our employees to be critical to both our operations and performance. We are committed to attracting, developing, retaining, and motivating a diverse and inclusive group of employees, and we do so in a variety of ways. Stewart’s end-to-end career framework attracts talent, encourages learning and development across the organization, creates transparency around job expectations through a deliberate performance management process, allows Stewart employees to take ownership of their career, and provides them with the resources needed to be successful in their current as well as future roles. Moreover, Stewart cares about the health, safety, and well-being of our employees and their families, and provides a variety of valuable health and welfare benefits, including but not limited to, medical, dental and vision coverage, life and disability insurance, 401(k) plan match, participation in an employee stock purchase plan, health savings account, flexible spending account, an employee assistance program, emotional health and wellness programs, local community based charitable programs through the Stewart Foundation, and global employee appreciation and recognition programs.

Stewart is committed to an inclusive workplace that values all employees equally, regardless of age, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or gender identification and committed to providing a supportive diverse professional work environment that is free of and prohibits discrimination against any employee or applicant for employment as defined by applicable laws as well as best practices in corporate governance. All phases of employment, including but not limited to, recruiting, selection, employment, placement, promotion, transfer, demotion, reduction of force and termination, benefits, training, and compensation are guided by the Company policies regarding conduct, including Stewart’s Equal Opportunity Employer statement and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

Cybersecurity. For the year ended December 31, 2020, Stewart experienced no known material cyber breaches. In the event a material breach takes place in the future, we have an incident response team in place to take immediate actions, work with local and national law enforcement and notify impacted parties. In addition, we would work with the NYSE to provide scope and scale through an appropriate Form 8-K filing, without providing information that could affect any law enforcement investigation.

Available information. We electronically file annual, quarterly and other reports and information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act). Our electronic filings can be accessed at the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. We also make available upon written request, free of charge, or through our Internet site (www.stewart.com), our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, Code of Ethics and, if applicable, amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.

The references in this annual report on Form 10-K to our website address or any third party’s website address, including the SEC’s website, do not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained in those websites and should not be considered part of this document unless otherwise expressly stated.

Transfer agent. Our transfer agent is Computershare, which can be contacted via regular mail at P.O. Box 505005, Louisville, KY, 40233-5005 and via its website (https://www-us.computershare.com/investor).

CEO and CFO certifications. The CEO and CFO certifications required under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act are filed as exhibits to our 2020 Form 10-K. Stewart submitted during 2020 its annual CEO Certification under Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Listed Company Manual.

5

Item 1A. Risk Factors

You should consider the following risk factors, as well as the other information presented in this report and our other filings with the SEC, in evaluating our business and any investment in Stewart. These risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In that event, the trading price of our Common Stock could decline materially.

Strategic Risk Factors

Acquisitions or strategic investments we have made or may make could turn out to be unsuccessful.

As part of our investment and growth strategy, we frequently monitor and analyze opportunities to acquire or make a strategic investment in new or other businesses where we believe we can have sustained success and improve Stewart’s scale and profitability. The negotiation of potential acquisitions or strategic investments as well as the integration of an acquired business or new personnel, could result in a substantial diversion of management resources. Future acquisitions could likewise involve numerous additional risks such as potential losses from unanticipated litigation or levels of claims and inability to generate sufficient revenue to offset acquisition costs. As we pursue or consummate a strategic transaction or investment, we may value the acquired or funded company or operations incorrectly, fail to integrate the acquired operations appropriately into our own operations, fail to successfully manage our operations as our product and geographical diversity increases, expend unforeseen costs during the acquisition or integration process, or encounter other unanticipated risks or challenges. If we succeed in consummating a strategic investment, we may fail to value it accurately or divest it or otherwise realize the value which we originally invested or have subsequently reflected in our consolidated financial statements. Any failure by us to effectively limit such risks or implement our acquisitions or strategic investment strategies could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Innovations introduced by real estate industry players, including Stewart and our competitors, may be potentially disruptive and could adversely affect Stewart

Various initiatives are introduced by real estate industry players, including Stewart and our competitors, utilizing innovative technologies, processes and techniques in order to improve the manner and timeliness of delivering products and services, increase efficiency, improve the quality of products and services and customer experience, and enhance risk management. These efforts include implementing advanced technologies to automate and streamline certain manual processes during, but not limited to, search and examination, title insurance policy issuance, and real estate transaction settlement. Innovations by our competitors may change the demand for our products and services, the manner our products and services are ordered or fulfilled, and the revenue or profitability derived from our products and services. Further, in developing and implementing our own innovation initiatives, we have made and will likely continue to make significant investments. Depending on factors relating to our operations, the real estate industry and the macroeconomic environment, these innovative investments may not be successful, may result in increased claims, reputational damage or other material impact on Stewart, or could disrupt our business operations by significantly diverting management's attention.

Rapid changes in our industry require secure, timely and cost-effective technological responses. Our earnings may be adversely affected if we are unable to effectively use technology to address regulatory changes and increase productivity.

We believe that our future success depends, in part, on our ability to anticipate changes in the industry and to offer products and services that meet evolving standards on a timely and cost-effective basis. To do so requires a flexible technology architecture which can continuously comply with changing regulations, improve productivity, lower costs, reduce risk and enhance the customer experience. Inability to meet these requirements and any unanticipated downtime in our technology may have a material adverse effect on our earnings.

6

A widespread health outbreak or pandemic, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic, could adversely impact our business operations

In March 2020, a global pandemic escalated relating to a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19), which resulted in decreased economic activity and financial volatility globally. In response to the pandemic, health and governmental bodies have issued travel restrictions, quarantine orders, temporary closures of non-essential businesses, and other restrictive measures. Although the title insurance industry has been deemed essential in the United States, the pandemic and measures to contain it have caused disruptions in the real estate market and on our business operations. Depending on the duration and extent of the disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the counter-measures enacted by health and governmental bodies and their timing, our future results of operations and financial position may be significantly impacted, which may include decreased volume of orders and other business activity, delayed closing of real estate transactions, and decreased value of investments and other assets.

Operational Risk Factors

Adverse changes in economic conditions, especially those affecting the levels of real estate and mortgage activity, may reduce our revenues.

Our financial condition and results of operations are affected by changes in economic conditions, particularly mortgage interest rates, credit availability, real estate prices and consumer confidence. Our revenues and earnings have fluctuated in the past due to the cyclical nature of the housing industry and we expect them to continue to fluctuate in the future.

The demand for our title insurance-related and mortgage services offerings is dependent primarily on the volume of residential and commercial real estate transactions. The volume of these transactions historically has been influenced by such factors as mortgage interest rates, availability of financing and the overall state of the economy. Typically, when interest rates are increasing or when the economy is experiencing a downturn, real estate activity declines. As a result, the title insurance industry tends to experience decreased revenues and earnings. Increases in interest rates may also have an adverse impact on our bond portfolio and the amount of interest we pay on our floating-rate bank debt.

Our revenues and results of operations have been and may in the future be adversely affected by a decline in home prices, real estate activity and the availability of financing alternatives. In addition, weakness or adverse changes in the level of real estate activity could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Our claims experience may require us to increase our provision for title losses or to record additional reserves, either of which would adversely affect our earnings.

We estimate our future loss payments, and our assumptions about future losses may prove inaccurate. Provisions for policy losses on policies written within a given year are charged to income in the same year the related premium revenues are recognized. The amounts provided are based on reported claims, historical loss payment experience, title industry averages and the current legal and economic environment. Losses that are higher than anticipated are an indication that total losses for a given policy year may be higher than originally calculated. Changes in the total estimated future loss for prior policy years are recorded in the period in which the estimate changes. Claims are often complex and involve uncertainties as to the dollar amount and timing of individual payments. Claims are often paid many years after a policy is issued. From time-to-time, we experience large losses, including losses from independent agency defalcations, from title policies that have been issued or worsening loss payment experience, any of which may require us to increase our title loss reserves. These events are unpredictable and may have a material adverse effect on our earnings.

7

The issuance of our title insurance policies and related activities by title agents, which operate with substantial independence from us, could adversely affect our operations.

Our title insurance subsidiaries issue a significant portion of their policies through title agents that operate largely independent of us. There is no guarantee that these title agents will fulfill their contractual obligations to us as contemplated, which such contracts include limitations that are designed to limit our risk with respect to their activities. In addition, regulators are increasingly seeking to hold title companies responsible for the actions of these title agents and, under certain circumstances, the Company may be held liable directly to third parties for actions (including defalcations) or omissions of these agents. Case law in certain states also suggests that the Company is liable for the actions or omissions of its agents in those states, regardless of contractual limitations. As a result, the Company’s use of title agents could result in increased claims on the Company’s policies issued through agents and an increase in other costs and expenses.

Competition in the title insurance industry may affect our revenues.

Competition in the title insurance industry is intense, particularly with respect to price, service and expertise. Larger commercial customers and mortgage originators also look to the size and financial strength of a title insurer. Although we are one of the leading title insurance underwriters based on market share, FNF, First American and Old Republic each has substantially greater gross revenues than we do and their holding companies have significantly greater capital. Further, other title insurance companies, collectively, hold a considerable share of the market. Although we are not aware of any current initiatives to reduce regulatory barriers to entering our industry, any such reduction could result in new competitors, including financial institutions, entering the title insurance business. From time-to-time, new entrants enter the marketplace with alternative products to traditional title insurance, although many of these alternative products have been disallowed by title insurance regulators. Further, advances in technologies could, over time, significantly disrupt the traditional business model of financial services and real estate-related companies, including title insurance. These alternative products or disruptive technologies, if permitted by regulators, could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and earnings.

Information technology systems present potential targets for cybersecurity attacks.

Our operations are reliant on technology. These systems are used to store and process sensitive information regarding our operations, financial position and any information pertaining to our customers and vendors. While we take the utmost precautions, we cannot guarantee safety from all cyber threats, wire fraud and attacks to our systems. Any successful breach of security could result in loss of sensitive data, spread of inaccurate or confidential information, disruption of operations, theft of escrowed funds, endangerment of employees, damage to our assets and increased costs to respond. Although we maintain cyber liability insurance to protect us financially, there is no assurance that the instances noted above would not have a negative impact on cash flows, litigation status and/or our reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In the event of a material cybersecurity breach, we have an incident response team in place to take immediate actions, work with local and national law enforcement, notify impacted parties as well as the NYSE.

Climate change and extreme weather events could adversely affect our operations and financial performance

Our operations and financial performance could be adversely impacted by climate change and extreme weather events, especially if these occurrences negatively impact the overall real estate market and the broader economy. With respect to the our investment portfolio, both individual corporate securities, as well as securities issued by municipalities could also see their value affected by such events. Given the unpredictable and uncertain nature of climate change and weather with respect to size, severity, frequency, geography, and duration, we are unable to quantify the true impact these events would have on our business and operations.

8

Regulatory and Compliance Risk Factors

A downgrade of our underwriters by rating agencies may reduce our revenues.

Ratings are a significant component in determining the competitiveness of insurance companies with respect to commercial title policies. Our domestic underwriters, Guaranty and STIC, have historically been highly rated by the rating agencies that cover us. These ratings are not credit ratings. Instead, the ratings are based on quantitative, and in some cases qualitative, information and reflect the conclusions of the rating agencies with respect to our financial strength, results of operations and ability to pay policyholder claims. Our ratings are subject to continual review by the rating agencies, and we cannot be assured that our current ratings will be maintained. If our ratings are downgraded from current levels by the rating agencies, our ability to retain existing customers and develop new customer relationships may be negatively impacted, which could result in a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Our insurance subsidiaries must comply with extensive government regulations. These regulations and the enforcement environment could adversely affect our ability to increase our revenues and operating results.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is charged with protecting consumers by enforcing federal consumer protection laws and regulations. The CFPB is an independent agency and funded by the United States Federal Reserve System. Its jurisdiction includes banks, credit unions, securities firms, payday lenders, mortgage servicing operations, foreclosure relief services, debt collectors and other financial companies. The nature and extent of these regulations include, but are not limited to: conducting rule-making, supervision, and enforcement of federal consumer protection laws; restricting unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices; marshalling consumer complaints; promoting financial education; researching consumer behavior; monitoring financial markets for new risks to consumers; and enforcing laws that outlaw discrimination and other unfair treatment in consumer finance.

Governmental authorities regulate our insurance subsidiaries in the various states and international jurisdictions in which we do business. These regulations generally are intended for the protection of policyholders rather than stockholders. The nature and extent of these regulations vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but typically involve:

•approving or setting of insurance premium rates;

•standards of solvency and minimum amounts of statutory capital and surplus that must be maintained;

•limitations on types and amounts of investments;

•establishing reserves, including statutory premium reserves, for losses and loss adjustment expenses;

•regulating underwriting and marketing practices;

•regulating dividend payments and other transactions among affiliates;

•prior approval for the acquisition and control of an insurance company or of any company controlling an insurance company;

•licensing of insurers, agencies and, in certain states, escrow officers;

•regulation of reinsurance;

•restrictions on the size of risks that may be insured by a single company;

•deposits of securities for the benefit of policyholders;

•approval of policy forms;

•methods of accounting; and

•filing of annual and other reports with respect to financial condition and other matters.

These regulations may impede or impose burdensome conditions on rate increases or other actions that we might want to take to enhance our operating results.

We may also be subject to additional state or federal regulations prescribed by legislation such as the Dodd-Frank Act or by regulations issued by the CFPB, Department of Labor, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Department of the Treasury or other agencies. Changes in regulations may have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, state regulators perform periodic examinations of insurance companies, which could result in increased compliance or legal expenses.

9

We rely on dividends from our insurance underwriting subsidiaries.

We are a holding company and our principal assets are our insurance underwriting subsidiaries. Consequently, we depend on receiving sufficient dividends from our insurance subsidiaries to meet our debt service obligations and to pay our parent company's operating expenses and dividends to our stockholders. The insurance statutes and regulations of some states require us to maintain a minimum amount of statutory capital and restrict the amount of dividends that our insurance subsidiaries may pay to us. Guaranty is a wholly owned subsidiary of Stewart and the principal source of our cash flow. In this regard, the ability of Guaranty to pay dividends to us is dependent on the approval of the Texas Insurance Commissioner. Refer to Note 3 to our audited consolidated financial statements for details on statutory surplus and dividend restrictions.

Financial Risk Factors

Availability of credit may reduce our liquidity and negatively impact our ability to fund operations.

We expect that cash flows from operations and cash available from our underwriters, subject to regulatory restrictions, will be sufficient to fund our operations, pay our claims and fund operational initiatives. To the extent that these funds are not sufficient, we may be required to borrow funds on less than favorable terms or seek funding from the equity market, which may be on terms that are dilutive to existing shareholders.

Claims by large classes of claimants may impact our financial condition or results of operations.

We are involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. In addition, we may be, and have been in the past, subject to claims and litigation from large classes of claimants seeking substantial damages not arising in the ordinary course of business. Material pending legal proceedings not in the ordinary course of business, if any, would be disclosed in Part I, Item 3—Legal Proceedings. To date, the impact of the outcome of these proceedings has not been material to our consolidated financial condition or results of operations. However, an unfavorable outcome in any litigation, claim or investigation against us could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Unfavorable economic or other business conditions could cause us to record an impairment of all or a portion of our goodwill, other intangible assets and other long-lived assets.

We annually perform impairment tests of the carrying values of our goodwill, other indefinite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets. We may also perform an evaluation whenever events may indicate an impairment has occurred. In assessing whether an impairment has occurred, we consider whether the performance of our reporting units may be below projections, unexpected declines in our market capitalization, negative macroeconomic trends or negative industry and company-specific trends. If we conclude that the carrying values of these assets exceed the fair value, we may be required to record an impairment of these assets. Any substantial impairment that may be required in the future could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Failures at financial institutions at which we deposit funds could adversely affect us.

We deposit substantial fiduciary funds, which are third-party funds, and operating funds in many financial institutions in excess of insured deposit limits. In the event that one or more of these financial institutions fail, there is no guarantee that we could recover the deposited funds in excess of federal deposit insurance, and, as such, we could be held liable for the funds owned by third parties. Under these circumstances, our liability could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Our investment portfolio is subject to interest rate and other risks and could experience losses.

We maintain a substantial investment portfolio, primarily consisting of fixed income debt securities and, to a lesser extent, equity securities. Our portfolio holdings are subject to certain economic and financial market risks, including credit risk, interest rate risk and liquidity risk. Instability in credit markets and economic conditions can increase the risk of loss in our portfolio. Periodically, we assess the recoverability of the amortized cost of our debt securities investments. If the amortized cost of such investments exceeds the fair value, and we conclude the decline is other-than-temporary, we are required to record an impairment. The impairment could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

10

General Risk Factor

Our business could be disrupted as a result of a threatened proxy contest and other actions of activist stockholders.

We have previously been the subject of actions taken by activist stockholders. When activist activities occur, our business could be adversely affected because we may have difficulty in attracting and retaining customers, agents, mortgage lenders, servicers, employees and board members due to perceived uncertainties as to our future direction and negative public statements about our business; such activities may materially harm our relationships with current and potential customers, investors, lenders, and others; may otherwise materially harm our business, may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition; responding to proxy contests and other similar actions by stockholders is likely to result in our incurring substantial additional costs, including, but not limited to, legal fees, fees for financial advisors, fees for investor relations advisors, and proxy solicitation fees; significantly divert the attention of management, our Board of Directors and our employees; and changes in the composition of our Board of Directors due to activist campaigns may affect our current strategic plan.

We cannot predict, and no assurances can be given as to, the outcome or timing of any matters relating to actions by activist stockholders or the ultimate impact on our business, liquidity, financial condition or results of operations.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

We currently lease under a non-cancelable operating lease that expires in year 2025 approximately 150,000 square feet of space in an office building in Houston, Texas, which is used for our corporate offices and for offices of several of our subsidiaries. Additionally, we lease space at approximately 420 locations for title office operations, production, administrative and technology centers. These additional locations include significant leased facilities in New York, New York; Glendale, California; Houston, Texas; Tucson, Arizona, Anchorage, Alaska; Richardson, Texas; and Denver, Colorado.

Our leases expire from 2021 through 2030 and we believe we will not have any difficulty obtaining renewals of leases as they expire or, alternatively, leasing comparable properties. The aggregate annual rent expense under all office leases was approximately $39.4 million in 2020.

We also own office buildings in Arizona, Texas, New York, New Mexico, Colorado and the United Kingdom. These owned properties are not material to our consolidated financial condition. We consider all buildings and equipment that we own or lease to be well maintained, adequately insured and generally sufficient for our purposes.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Information regarding our legal proceedings can be found in Note 17 to our audited consolidated financial statements, included in Part IV, Item 15 of this annual report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

11

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market and Holders Information. Our Common Stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “STC”. As of February 19, 2021, the number of stockholders of record was approximately 5,100 and the price of one share of our Common Stock was $54.93.

Stock Performance Graph. The following table and graph compares the yearly percentage change in our cumulative total stockholder return on Common Stock with the cumulative total return of the Russell 2000 Index and the Russell 2000 Financial Services Sector Index for the five years ended December 31, 2020. The presented information assumes that the value of the investment in our Common Stock and each index was $100 at December 31, 2015 and that all dividends were reinvested.

The performance graph above and the related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.

12

Stock Repurchases. There were no stock repurchases during 2020, except for repurchases of approximately 25,500 shares (aggregate purchase price of approximately $1.1 million) related to statutory income tax withholding on the annual vesting of restricted share grants to executives and senior management.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)

MANAGEMENT'S OVERVIEW

For the year ended December 31, 2020, net income attributable to Stewart was $154.9 million, or $6.22 per diluted share, compared to $78.6 million, or $3.31 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2019. Pretax income before noncontrolling interests for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $218.5 million, compared to $117.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. Total revenues increased 18% to $2.3 billion in 2020, from $1.9 billion in 2019, primarily due to increased revenues from title operations principally resulting from increased transaction volumes, and a net revenue increase from ancillary services operations mainly due to acquisitions during 2020. In line with the improved revenues, total operating expenses increased 14% in 2020 compared to 2019. Refer to "Results of Operations" for detailed year-to-year income statement discussions, and "Liquidity and Capital Resources" for an analysis of Stewart's financial condition.

During 2020, we acquired a number of title offices across several states, two appraisal management services companies, and an online notarization and closing solutions provider, in line with our investment and growth strategy of focusing on attractive businesses and geographies where we can have sustained success and where additional scale can efficiently and effectively improve profitability and margins. These acquisitions realign Stewart to strongly compete in several strategic markets where we have traditionally been underrepresented. As expected, these acquisitions were immediately accretive to Stewart and contributed in 2020 total revenues and pretax income of $109.2 million and $17.3 million, respectively. We believe our solid operating results and liquidity position will allow us to continue investing and growing to maximize our operational potential.

For the fourth quarter 2020, we reported net income attributable to Stewart of $59.7 million ($2.22 per diluted share), compared to break-even results for the fourth quarter 2019. On an adjusted basis, Stewart’s fourth quarter 2020 net income of $56.4 million ($2.09 per diluted share) increased 174% from $20.6 million ($0.87 per diluted share) in the fourth quarter 2019. Fourth quarter 2020 pretax income before noncontrolling interests was $83.9 million compared to pretax income before noncontrolling interests of $3.8 million for the fourth quarter 2019.

Fourth quarter 2020 results included $4.4 million of pretax net realized and unrealized gains, composed of $3.9 million of net unrealized gains on fair value changes of equity securities investments and $0.5 million of net realized gains on sale of securities investments recorded in the title segment.

Fourth quarter 2019 results included the following pretax items:

•$8.0 million of net realized and unrealized losses, which included $11.7 million of impairment expenses relating to long-lived assets, partially offset by $2.2 million of realized gains on sale of securities investments and $1.1 million of net unrealized gains on fair value changes of equity securities investments,

•$6.5 million of severance expenses related to our corporate reorganization included in employee costs ($4.3 million in the ancillary services and corporate segment and $2.2 million in the title segment),

•$5.9 million of office closure costs primarily related to lease terminations included in other operating expenses ($4.7 million in the title segment and $1.2 million in the ancillary services and corporate segment),

•$2.2 million of executive insurance policy settlement expense recorded as part of other operating expenses within the ancillary services and corporate segment,

•$1.7 million of commercial services’ escrow loss recorded as part of title loss expense in the title segment, and

•$2.1 million of other non-operating charges ($1.3 million in the ancillary services and corporate segment and $0.8 million in the title segment).

13

Summary results of the title segment are as follows (in $ millions, except pretax margin and % change):

For the Three MonthsEnded December 31,

Investment income 4.1 5.2 (21) %

Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) 4.4 (3.4) 230 %

Pretax margin 13.6 % 4.0 %

Title segment pretax income increased $74.6 million, while pretax margin improved 960 basis points to 13.6% in the fourth quarter 2020 compared to the prior year quarter. Title operating revenues increased $184.2 million, or 36%, resulting from increases in direct title revenues of $106.0 million, or 45%, and gross independent agency revenues of $78.3 million, or 29%. In line with the increased title revenues, the segment’s fourth quarter 2020 overall operating expenses increased $116.3 million, or 24%, with agency retention expenses and combined title employee costs and other operating expenses increasing 28% and 16%, respectively, from the prior year quarter. Average independent agency remittance rate improved to 18.2% in the fourth quarter 2020, compared to 17.7% in the prior year quarter, while combined title employee costs and other operating expenses, as a percentage of title revenues, improved to 38.8% in the fourth quarter 2020 compared to 45.7% in the prior year quarter.

Title loss expense increased $17.7 million, or 61%, in the fourth quarter 2020 compared to the prior year quarter, primarily due to increased title revenues and higher loss provisioning rates due to the macroeconomic environment. As a percentage of title revenues, the title loss expense in the fourth quarter 2020 was 6.8% compared to 5.7% from the prior year quarter; on a full year basis, the title loss ratio was 5.3% in 2020 compared to 4.6% in 2019. Given the current economic environment, we anticipate that our 2021 loss ratio will be comparable to the full year 2020 loss ratio.

The segment’s investment income decreased $1.1 million, or 21%, in the fourth quarter 2020, primarily as a result of lower interest rates during 2020. As noted previously, net realized and unrealized gains for the fourth quarter 2020 consisted primarily of net unrealized gains on fair value changes of equity securities investments (as noted above), while net realized and unrealized losses for the fourth quarter 2019 included $7.1 million of impairment expenses related to long-lived assets, partially offset by net gains from sale of securities investments and fair value changes of equity securities investments.

Direct title revenue information is presented below (in $ millions, except % change):

For the Three MonthsEnded December 31,

Non-commercial

Commercial:

14

Direct title revenues increased as a result of overall improvements in commercial and non-commercial revenues, primarily driven by increased transactions during the fourth quarter 2020 compared to the prior year quarter. Domestic non-commercial revenues increased $90.6 million, or 61%, as a result of higher purchase and refinancing residential closed orders from both existing and newly acquired title offices. Domestic commercial revenues improved $3.4 million, or 6%, due to increased transaction size and volume. Total international revenues increased $11.9 million, or 38%, primarily due to higher volumes in our Canadian and European operations. Domestic commercial fee per file in the fourth quarter 2020 was approximately $12,900, an improvement of 6% from the fourth quarter 2019; while domestic residential fee per file was approximately $2,000, or 4% lower than the prior year quarter, primarily due to a higher mix of refinancing compared to purchase transactions.

Summary results of the ancillary services and corporate segment are as follows (in $ millions, except % change):

For the Three MonthsEnded December 31,

Net realized losses — (4.6) 100 %

The segment’s operating revenues increased from the prior year quarter as a result of 2020 acquisitions, which generated $34.5 million in the fourth quarter 2020. Revenues from our capital markets search and home equity valuation services operations declined $3.2 million, or 48%, due to significantly lower customer orders. Net realized losses in the fourth quarter 2019 were primarily related to impairments of long-lived assets. Pretax results for ancillary services operations, including acquisitions, improved $0.5 million, or 48%, in the fourth quarter 2020 compared to the prior year quarter. Net expenses attributable to parent company and corporate operations for the fourth quarter 2020 were approximately $10.4 million, which included costs related to charitable contributions, increased employee vacation carryover, and third-party strategic consulting; while net expenses for the fourth quarter 2019 were approximately $10.9 million, which included reorganization severance expenses, executive insurance policy settlement costs, charitable contributions and asset impairment charges.

COVID-19 pandemic. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, health and governmental bodies, including the state of Texas where we are headquartered, issued travel restrictions, quarantine orders, temporary closures of non-essential businesses and other restrictive measures. In response to the pandemic, we deployed our business continuity plan in March and continue to take appropriate measures to protect the safety of all our employees and customers, while monitoring the evolving effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the national and international fronts. Within the U.S., our business was deemed an essential business which allowed us to continue underwriting and closing real estate transactions for our residential and commercial customers on a daily basis. When possible, we utilize our digital capabilities, including remote online notarization (RON), remote ink notarization (RIN), electronic signature platforms, virtual underwriting, and mobile earnest money transfer tools to aid our employees in facilitating real estate transactions during this challenging environment.

Currently, various levels of restrictions to address the spread of COVID-19 are still in place across the U.S. and the rest of the world, with some economies gradually opening up and efforts to distribute vaccines continue. We continue to proactively manage our business through this crisis with the help of our exceptional employees and support of our customers. While the pandemic continues, Stewart is committed to helping people safely navigate the real estate closing process. We believe our strong liquidity position and innovative solutions will allow us to facilitate our customers’ purchase and refinance of real estate should macroeconomic conditions become more challenging.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

Actual results can differ from our accounting estimates. While we do not anticipate significant changes in our estimates, there is a risk that such changes could have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations for future periods. The discussion of critical accounting estimates below should be read in conjunction with the related accounting policies disclosed within Note 1 to our audited consolidated financial statements in Part IV of this annual report.

15

Title loss reserves

Provisions for title losses, as a percentage of title operating revenues, were 5.3%, 4.6% and 3.9% for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Actual loss payment experience, including the impact of large losses, is the primary reason for increases or decreases in our loss provision. A 100 basis point change in the loss provisioning percentage, a reasonably likely scenario based on our historical loss experience, would have increased or decreased our provision for title losses and pretax operating results by approximately $21.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

We consider our actual claims payments and incurred loss experience, including the frequency and severity of claims, compared to our actuarial estimates of claims payments and incurred losses in determining whether our overall loss experience has improved or worsened relative to prior periods. We also consider the impact of economic or market factors on particular policy years to determine whether the results of those policy years are indicative of future expectations. In addition, large claims, including large title losses due to independent agency defalcations, are analyzed and reserved for separately due to the potential higher dollar amount of loss, lower volume of claims reported and sporadic reporting of such claims. We evaluate the frequency and severity of large losses in determining whether our experience has improved or worsened. Our method for recording the reserves for title losses on both an interim and annual basis begins with the calculation of our current loss provision rate which is applied to our current premium revenues, resulting in a title loss expense for the period, except for large claims and escrow losses. This loss provision rate is set to provide for losses on current year policies and is primarily determined using moving average ratios of recent actual policy loss payment experience (net of recoveries) to premium revenues.

Due to the inherent uncertainty in predicting future title policy losses, significant judgment is required by our management and our third-party actuaries in estimating reserves. As a consequence, our ultimate liability may be materially greater or lower than current reserves and/or our third-party actuary’s calculated estimates.

Provisions for known claims arise primarily from prior policy years as claims are not typically reported until several years after policies are issued. Provisions - Incurred But Not Reported (IBNR) are estimates of claims expected to be incurred over the next 20 years; therefore, it is not unusual or unexpected to experience changes to those estimated provisions in both current and prior policy years as additional loss experience on policy years is obtained. This loss experience may result in changes to our estimate of total ultimate losses expected (i.e., the IBNR policy loss reserve). Current year provisions - IBNR are recorded on policies issued in the current year as a percentage of premiums earned (loss provisioning rate). As claims become known, provisions are reclassified from IBNR to known claims. Adjustments relating to large losses (those individually in excess of $1.0 million) may impact provisions either for known claims or for IBNR.

(in $ millions)

Provisions – Known Claims:

Provisions – IBNR

Transferred IBNR to Known Claims (68.8) (73.5) (61.6)

16

In 2020, total known claims provisions decreased by $8.8 million, or 10%, to $83.1 million primarily due to lower reported claims relating to prior year policies compared to 2019. Total 2020 provisions - IBNR increased by $34.9 million, or 53%, to $100.9 million compared to the prior year, primarily due to increased title premiums, higher loss provisioning rates driven by an overall uncertainty related to incurred losses resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, and unfavorable loss experience in our Canadian operations. In 2019, total known claims provisions increased by $12.1 million, or 15%, to $91.9 million primarily due to the higher reported claims relating to prior year policies compared to 2018. Total 2019 provisions - IBNR increased by $12.7 million, or 24%, to $66.0 million compared to the prior year, primarily as a result of unfavorable loss experience in 2019 and a $4.0 million prior policy year reserve reduction during 2018. As a percentage of title operating revenues, current year provisions - IBNR were 3.9%, 3.3% and 2.8% in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Provisions - IBNR relating to prior policy years for 2019 were primarily related to adverse developments on large claims.

In addition to title policy claims, we incur losses in our direct operations from escrow, closing and disbursement functions. These escrow losses typically relate to errors or other miscalculations of amounts to be paid at closing, including timing or amount of a mortgage payoff, payment of property or other taxes and payment of homeowners’ association fees. Escrow losses also arise in cases of fraud, and in those cases, the title insurer incurs the loss under its obligation to ensure that an unencumbered title is conveyed. Escrow losses are recognized as expense when discovered or when contingencies associated with them (such as litigation) are resolved and are typically paid less than 12 months after the loss is recognized.

Large title losses due to independent agency defalcations typically occur when the independent agency misappropriates funds from escrow accounts under its control. Such losses are usually discovered when the independent agency fails to pay off an outstanding mortgage loan at closing (or immediately thereafter) from the proceeds of the new loan. These incurred losses are typically more severe in terms of dollar value compared with traditional title policy claims since the independent agency is often able, over time, to conceal misappropriation of escrow funds relating to more than one transaction through the constant volume of funds moving through its escrow accounts. In declining real estate markets, lower transaction volumes result in a lower incoming volume of funds, making it more difficult to cover up the misappropriation with incoming funds. Thus, when the defalcation is discovered, it often relates to several transactions. In addition, the overall decline in an independent agency’s revenues, profits and cash flows increases the agency’s incentive to improperly utilize the escrow funds from real estate transactions. For each of the three years ended December 31, 2020, our net title losses due to independent agency defalcations were not material.

Internal controls relating to independent agencies include, but are not limited to, periodic audits, site visits and reconciliations of policy inventories and premiums. The audits and site visits cover examination of the escrow account bank reconciliations and an examination of a sample of closed transactions. In some instances, the scope of our review is limited by attorney agencies that cite client confidentiality. Certain states have mandated annual reviews of agencies by their underwriter. We also determine whether our independent agencies have appropriate internal controls as defined by the American Land Title Association's best practices and us. However, even with adequate internal controls in place, their effectiveness can be circumvented by collusion or improper override of the controls by management at the independent agencies. To aid in the selection of independent agencies to review, we have developed an agency risk model that aggregates data from different areas to identify possible issues. This is not a guarantee that all independent agencies with deficiencies will be identified. In addition, we are typically not the only underwriter for which an independent agency issues policies, and independent agencies may not always provide complete financial records for our review.

Goodwill impairment

Goodwill is not amortized, but is reviewed annually during the third quarter using June 30 balances, or whenever occurrences of events indicate a potential impairment at the reporting unit level. We evaluate goodwill based on four reporting units with goodwill balances - direct operations, agency operations, international operations and ancillary services.

17

We have an option to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. In performing the qualitative assessment, we consider factors that include macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, overall actual and expected financial performance, market perspective on the Company, as well as other relevant events and circumstances determined by management. We evaluate the weight of each factor to determine whether an impairment more-likely-than-not exists. If we decide not to use a qualitative assessment or if the reporting unit fails the qualitative assessment, we perform the quantitative impairment analysis.

The quantitative analysis involves the comparison of the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying amount. The goodwill impairment is calculated as the excess of the reporting unit's carrying amount over the estimated fair value and is charged to current operations. While we are responsible for assessing whether an impairment of goodwill exists, we utilize inputs from third-party appraisers in performing the quantitative analysis. We estimate the fair value using a combination of the income approach (discounted cash flow (DCF) technique) and the market approach (guideline company and precedent transaction analyses). The DCF model utilizes historical and projected operating results and cash flows, initially driven by estimates of changes in future revenue levels, and risk-adjusted discount rates. Our projected operating results are primarily driven by anticipated mortgage originations, which we obtain from projections by industry experts, for our title reporting units and expected contractual revenues for our ancillary services reporting unit. Fluctuations in revenues, followed by our ability to appropriately adjust our employee count and other operating expenses, or large and unanticipated adjustments to title loss reserves, are the primary reasons for increases or decreases in our projected operating results. Our market-based valuation methodologies utilize (i) market multiples of earnings and/or other operating metrics of comparable companies and (ii) our market capitalization and a control premium based on market data.

The valuation techniques performed in our quantitative analysis make use of our estimates and assumptions related to critical factors, which include revenue and operating margin growth rates, future market conditions, determination of market multiples and comparative companies, assignment of a control premium, and determination of risk-adjusted discount rates. Forecasts of future operations are based, in part, on actual operating results and our expectations as to future market conditions. Our calculation of fair value requires analysis of a range of possible outcomes and applying weights to each of the valuation technique used. Due to the uncertainty and complexity of performing the goodwill impairment analysis, actual results may not be consistent with our estimates and assumptions, which may result in a future material goodwill impairment.

We concluded that the goodwill related to each of our reporting units was not impaired after performing the qualitative assessment during 2020 and the quantitative impairment analysis during 2019. Refer to Note 1-L and Note 8 to our audited consolidated financial statements for details on goodwill.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

We discuss in this section the consolidated results of operations for the years 2020 and 2019, as compared to each corresponding prior year. Factors contributing to fluctuations in our results of operations are presented in the order of their monetary significance, and significant changes are quantified, when necessary. Segment results are included in the discussions and are discussed separately, when relevant.

Industry data. Published U.S. mortgage interest rates and other selected residential housing data for the three years ended December 31, 2020 are shown below (amounts shown for 2020 are preliminary and subject to revision). The amounts below may not relate directly to or provide accurate data for forecasting our operating revenues or order counts. Our statements on home sales, mortgage interest rates and loan activity are based on averaged published industry data from sources including Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Mortgage Bankers Association.

Mortgage interest rates (30-year, fixed-rate) – %

Refinancings – % of originations 62 46 30

New home sales – median sales price in $ thousands 332 323 326

Existing home sales – in millions 5.65 5.34 5.34

Existing home sales – median sales price in $ thousands 292 273 259

Total mortgage originations improved 67% in 2020 compared to 2019 primarily due to the record-low interest rates in 2020, which drove refinancing lending to increase 125% from the prior year. Purchase lending also increased 17%, which was additionally influenced by growth in buyer demand, despite lower housing inventory levels. Compared to the prior year, new and existing home sales in 2020 improved 23% and 6%, respectively, while the median new and existing home prices also increased 3% and 7%, respectively.

For 2021, the average 30-year mortgage interest fixed rate is expected to stay the same with that of 2020, while the housing activity, though expected to remain strong in 2021, is forecasted to decelerate compared to the pace set by the second half of 2020. Total lending is estimated to decline 21%, compared to 2020, mainly due to 39% lower refinancing originations, which will be partially offset by an 8% rise in purchase originations. Nevertheless, 2021 refinancing originations are expected to be 38% higher than that in 2019. New and existing homes sales in 2021 are expected to grow 10% and 7%, respectively, compared to 2020, while median new and existing home prices are estimated to increase 2% and 3%, respectively.

Factors affecting revenues. Our primary business is title insurance and settlement-related services. We close transactions and issue title policies on homes, commercial and other real properties located in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and international markets through policy-issuing offices, independent agencies and centralized title services centers, or through reinsurance agreements. Our ancillary services and corporate segment includes our parent holding company expenses and certain enterprise-wide overhead costs, along with our ancillary services operations, which are principally appraisal management, search and valuation services. The principal factors that contribute to changes in our operating revenues include:

•mortgage interest rates;

•availability of mortgage loans;

•number and average value of mortgage loan originations;

•ability of potential purchasers to qualify for loans;

•inventory of existing homes available for sale;

•ratio of purchase transactions compared with refinance transactions;

•ratio of closed orders to open orders;

•home prices;

•consumer confidence, including employment trends;

•demand by buyers;

•number of households;

•premium rates;

•foreign currency exchange rates;

•market share;

•ability to attract and retain highly productive sales executives and associates;

•departure of revenue-attached employees;

•independent agency remittance rates;

•opening of new offices and acquisitions;

•number and value of commercial transactions, which typically yield higher premiums;

•government or regulatory initiatives, including tax incentives;

18

•acquisitions or divestitures of businesses;

•volume of distressed property transactions;

•seasonality and/or weather; and

•outbreaks of disease, including the COVID-19 pandemic, and related restrictions on travel, trade and business operations.

Premiums are determined in part by the values of the transactions we handle. To the extent inflation or market conditions cause increases in the prices of homes and other real estate, premium revenues are also increased. Conversely, falling home prices cause premium revenues to decline. As an overall guideline, a 5% change in median home prices results in approximately 3.7% change in title premiums. Home price changes may override the seasonal nature of the title insurance business. Historically, our first quarter is the least active in terms of title insurance revenues as home buying is generally depressed during winter months. Our second and third quarters are the most active as the summer is the traditional home buying season, and while commercial transaction closings are skewed to the end of the year, individually large commercial transactions can occur any time of year. On average, refinance title premium rates are 60% of the premium rates for a similarly priced sale transaction.

Title revenues.Direct title revenue information is presented below:

Year Ended December 31 Change Percent Change

(in $ millions) (in $ millions)

Non-commercial

Commercial:

Direct title revenues in 2020 improved 19% compared to 2019, primarily due to higher non-commercial revenues driven by increased purchase and refinancing residential orders from existing offices and revenues generated by acquired title offices in 2020. This increase was partially offset by decreased commercial revenues primarily resulting from reduced transaction sizes and volumes. Total refinancing and purchased closed orders in 2020 increased 123% and 8%, respectively; while commercial closed orders decreased 8% compared to 2019. Domestic residential fee per file in 2020 was approximately $1,900 in 2020 compared to $2,200 in 2019, primarily as a result of a higher mix of refinancing compared to purchase transactions in 2020. Domestic commercial fee per file in 2020 was $11,100 compared to $11,600 in 2019, primarily due to lower transaction sizes resulting from the slowdown in the commercial real estate market during the COVID-19 pandemic. Total international revenues grew $12.3 million, or 11%, in 2020 versus 2019, primarily because of higher volumes generated by our Canada operations, partially offset by lower volumes from other international locations.

Direct title revenues in 2019 increased 4% compared to 2018, primarily due to the improvement in non-commercial domestic and total international revenues, respectively, which were partially offset by a decline in domestic commercial revenues. The improvement in non-commercial domestic revenues was primarily due to a 13% improvement in total purchase and refinancing closed orders influenced by lower interest rates in 2019 compared to the prior year. Domestic commercial revenues declined primarily as a result of lower number of commercial transactions in 2019 versus the prior year. Total international revenues increased primarily due to improved transaction volumes in our Canada and United Kingdom operations, partially offset by the effect of the weaker average exchange rates of the Canadian dollar and United Kingdom pound against the U.S. dollar during 2019 compared to 2018.

19

Closed and opened orders information is as follows:

Year Ended December 31 Change % Change

Opened Orders:

Closed Orders:

Gross revenues from independent agency operations (agency revenues) increased $180.5 million, or 19%, in 2020 compared to 2019, which was consistent with the improving real estate market trends and the continued return of agents after the terminated merger transaction with FNF in late 2019. Gross agency revenues in 2019 declined $33.4 million, or 3%, compared to 2018, primarily due to the negative effect of the proposed FNF merger on our agents. In line with the change in gross agency revenues, net agency revenues (which are net of agency retention) increased $35.2 million, or 21%, in 2020 and declined $5.6 million, or 3%, in 2019 compared to 2018. Refer further to the "Retention by agencies" discussion under Expenses below.

Title revenues by geographic location. The approximate amounts and percentages of consolidated title operating revenues for the last three years ended December 31, 2020 were as follows:

Year Ended December 31 Percentages

(in $ millions)

Ancillary services revenues. Ancillary services revenues in 2020 increased $45.2 million, or 121%, compared to 2019, primarily due to $65.8 million of revenues generated from 2020 acquisitions, partially offset by $20.6 million, or 55%, lower revenues from our capital markets search and home equity valuation services operations as a result of reduced market activity in 2020. In 2019, ancillary services revenues declined $13.3 million, or 26%, compared to 2018, primarily due to significantly lower customer orders.

Investment income. Investment income in 2020 declined $1.2 million, or 6%, compared to 2019, primarily due to lower interest income on investments resulting from the low interest rates environment in 2020; while investment income in 2019 was comparable to 2018. Refer to Note 6 to our audited consolidated financial statements for additional details.

Net realized and unrealized gains. Refer to Note 6 to our audited consolidated financial statements for details.

20

Expenses. Our employee costs and certain other operating expenses are sensitive to inflation. An analysis of expenses is shown below:

Year Ended December 31 Change % Change

(in $ millions) (in $ millions)

As a % of agency revenues 82.1 % 82.3 % 82.4 %

As a % of operating revenues 27.0 % 30.2 % 29.8 %

As a % of operating revenues 16.5 % 18.4 % 18.3 %

As a % of title revenues 5.3 % 4.6 % 3.9 %

`

Retention by agencies. Amounts retained by title agencies are based on agreements between the agencies and our title underwriters. Amounts retained by independent agencies, as a percentage of revenues generated by them, averaged 82.1%, 82.3% and 82.4% in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The slight improvement of the average retention ratio in 2020, compared to 2019, was primarily due to relatively higher agency revenue increase in states with lower retention rates. The average retention percentage may vary from period to period due to the geographical mix of agency operations, the volume of title revenues and, in some states, laws or regulations. Due to the variety of such laws or regulations, as well as competitive factors, the average retention rate can differ significantly from state to state. In addition, a high proportion of our independent agencies are in states with retention rates greater than 80%. We continue to focus on increasing profit margins in every state, increasing premium revenue in states where remittance rates are above 20%, and maintaining the quality of our agency network, which we believe to be the industry’s best, in order to mitigate claims risk and drive consistent future performance. While market share is important in our agency operations channel, it is not as important as margins, risk mitigation and profitability.

Non-operating charges. Comparisons for employee costs and other operating expenses for the three years ended December 31, 2020 are influenced by the following non-operating charges:

(in $ thousands)

Ancillary services and corporate segment:

FNF merger expenses Other operating expenses — 6,835 12,673

Severance expenses Employee costs — 4,296 354

Executive insurance policy settlement Other operating expenses — 2,151 —

Office closure costs Other operating expenses — 1,222 —

Litigation-related accruals Other operating expenses — — 1,200

Other charges Other operating expenses — 1,298 —

Title segment:

Office closure costs Other operating expenses — 5,346 750

21

Selected cost ratios (by segment). The following table shows employee costs and other operating expenses as a percentage of related segment operating revenues for the years ended December 31:

Employee Costs Other Operating Expenses

Employee costs. Consolidated employee costs increased $46.0 million, or 8%, primarily due to acquisitions, higher incentive compensation on improved operating results, and increased overtime costs driven by higher transaction volumes in 2020 compared to 2019. These increases were partially offset by reduced salaries expense resulting from a 4% reduction in average employee counts (excluding acquisitions) in 2020. Consolidated employee costs in 2019 increased $4.7 million, or 1%, compared to 2018, primarily due to increased incentive compensation resulting from higher direct title revenues and the executive severance charges related to the corporate reorganization, which was partially offset by reduced salaries expense driven by a 6% reduction in average employee counts.

Our total employee counts at December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 were approximately 5,800, 5,300 and 5,400, respectively. Average cost per employee in 2020 and 2019 both increased 7%, compared to the corresponding prior years, primarily due to increased incentive compensation and severance charges. As a percentage of total operating revenues, employee costs were 27.0%, 30.2% and 29.8% in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Employee costs for the title segment increased $46.6 million, or 9%, in 2020 compared to 2019, primarily due to acquisitions and higher incentive compensation on higher title revenues. The title segment's employee costs in 2019 increased $7.2 million, or 1%, versus 2018, primarily due to increased incentive compensation, partially reduced by the lower salaries expense resulting from lower average employee counts. Employee costs in the ancillary services and corporate segment decreased $0.6 million, or 2%, in 2020 compared to 2019, and also decreased $2.5 million, or 8%, in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to lower overall costs resulting from reduced average employee counts driven volume declines. However, the decreased employee costs in 2020 were partially offset by added employee costs from 2020 acquisitions.

Other operating expenses. Other operating expenses include costs that are fixed in nature, costs that follow, to varying degrees, changes in transaction volumes and revenues (variable costs) and costs that fluctuate independently of revenues (independent costs). Costs that are fixed in nature include attorney and professional fees, third-party outsourcing provider fees, equipment rental, insurance, rent and other occupancy expenses, repairs and maintenance, technology costs, telecommunications and title plant expenses. Variable costs include appraiser expenses, outside search and valuation fees, attorney fee splits, bad debt expenses, copy supplies, delivery fees, postage, premium taxes and title plant maintenance expenses. Independent costs include general supplies, litigation defense, business promotion and marketing and travel.

Consolidated other operating expenses increased $29.8 million, or 9%, in 2020 compared to 2019, while other operating expenses in 2019 were comparable to 2018. Other operating expenses, as a percentage of total operating revenues (other operating expenses ratio), were 16.5%, 18.4% and 18.3% in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Excluding the impact of the non-operating charges (as presented in the table above), the other operating expenses ratio would have been 17.5% in both 2019 and 2018.

In 2020, excluding the non-operating charges presented in the table above, costs fixed in nature increased $1.3 million, or 1%, compared to 2019, primarily due to increased professional and consulting fees related to acquisitions and integration and higher technology expenses, partially offset by lower rent and other occupancy expenses. Variable costs increased $55.3 million, or 37%, primarily due to increased appraiser expenses tied to appraisal revenues generated by new acquisitions in the ancillary services operations, as well as higher premium taxes, title plant maintenance expenses and attorney fee splits consistent with higher overall title revenues. These increases were partially offset by lower outside search expenses related to lower revenues from commercial title and search and valuation services operations. Independent costs, excluding the operating charges, decreased $9.1 million, or 20%, primarily due to reduced marketing and travel expenses mainly as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

22

In 2019, excluding the non-operating charges presented in the table above, costs fixed in nature decreased $6.1 million, or 4%, compared to 2018, primarily due to reduced insurance expenses, professional and consulting fees and telecommunications expenses. Variable costs remained comparable to the prior year as the decreased outside search expenses resulting from lower ancillary services revenues were offset by increased bad debt expenses and higher premium taxes on higher title revenues. Excluding the non-operating charges, independent costs increased $2.9 million, or 7%, primarily due to increased marketing expenses and litigation-related accruals.

Title losses. Provisions for title losses, as a percentage of title operating revenues, were 5.3%, 4.6% and 3.9% in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The title loss ratio in any given year can be significantly influenced by new large claims incurred as well as adjustments to reserves for existing large claims. We continue to manage and resolve large claims prudently and in keeping with our commitments to our policyholders.

For the year ended December 31, 2020, title losses increased $30.8 million, or 36%, compared to 2019, primarily due to increased title premiums, higher loss provisioning rate driven by an overall uncertainty related to incurred losses resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, and unfavorable loss experience in our Canadian operations. For the year ended December 31, 2019, title losses increased $12.9 million, or 18%, compared to 2018, primarily due to unfavorable loss experience in 2019, resulting in a higher current year policy provisioning rate and increased loss provisions in portions of our non-Canadian international operations, and a $4.0 million prior policy year reserve reduction during 2018.

Title losses paid were $82.0 million, $91.0 million and $82.7 million in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Total claim payments in 2020 decreased compared to 2019, primarily due to lower payments on non-large claims, partially offset by higher payments on large claims. The higher claims payments in 2019 compared to the prior year were primarily due to higher payments on non-large claims, partially offset by lower payments on large claims. Claims payments made on large title claims, net of insurance recoveries, during 2020, 2019 and 2018 were $8.7 million, $6.1 million and $7.3 million, respectively.

Our liability for estimated title losses as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 comprises both known claims and our IBNR. Known claims reserves are reserves related to actual losses reported to us. Our reserve for known claims comprises both claims related to title insurance policies as well as losses arising from escrow closing and funding operations due to fraud or error (which are recognized as expense when discovered). The amount of the reserve represents the aggregate, non-discounted future payments (net of recoveries) that we expect to incur on policy and escrow losses and in costs to settle claims.

Total title policy loss reserve balances at December 31 were as follows:

(in $ millions)

Title claims are generally reported within the first six years after policy issuance and the timing of payments on these claims can significantly impact the balance of known claims, since claims, in many cases, may be open for several years before resolution and payment occur. As a result, the estimate of ultimate amount to be paid on any claim may be modified over that time period. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, our reserve balance was above the actuarial midpoint of total estimated policy loss reserves.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense in 2020 decreased $3.3 million, or 15%, compared to 2019, primarily due to certain information technology and other fixed assets being fully depreciated or written off by end of 2019, and reduced purchases of fixed assets in 2020, partially offset by $2.7 million of intangible asset amortization related to 2020 acquisitions. Depreciation and amortization expense in 2019 decreased $2.4 million, or 10%, compared to the prior year, primarily due to some assets being fully depreciated or amortized.

Income taxes. Our effective tax rates for 2020, 2019 and 2018 were 24.0%, 25.3% and 22.1%, respectively, based on income before taxes (after deducting noncontrolling interests) of $203.7 million, $105.3 million and $61.0 million, respectively. Refer to Note 7 to our audited consolidated financial statements for details on the effective tax rates and income tax accounts.

23

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our liquidity and capital resources reflect our ability to generate cash flow to meet our obligations to shareholders, customers (payments to satisfy claims on title policies), vendors, employees, lenders and others. As of December 31, 2020, our total cash and investments, including amounts reserved pursuant to statutory requirements, aggregated $1.1 billion ($621.2 million, net of statutory reserves on cash and investments). Of our total cash and investments at December 31, 2020, $814.8 million ($546.0 million, net of statutory reserves) was held in the United States (U.S.) and the rest internationally, principally in Canada.

Cash held at the parent company totaled $3.6 million at December 31, 2020. As a holding company, the parent company is funded principally by cash from its subsidiaries in the form of dividends, operating and other administrative expense reimbursements and pursuant to intercompany tax sharing agreements. The expense reimbursements are paid in accordance with management agreements, approved by the Texas Department of Insurance (TDI), among us and our subsidiaries. In addition to funding operating expenses, cash held at the parent company is used for dividend payments to common stockholders. To the extent such uses exceed cash available, the parent company is dependent on distributions from Guaranty, its regulated title insurance underwriter.

A substantial majority of our consolidated cash and investments as of December 31, 2020 was held by Guaranty and its subsidiaries. The use and investment of these funds, dividends to the parent company, and cash transfers between Guaranty and its subsidiaries and the parent company are subject to certain legal and regulatory restrictions. In general, Guaranty may use its cash and investments in excess of its legally-mandated statutory premium reserve (established in accordance with requirements under Texas law) to fund its insurance operations, including claims payments. Guaranty may also, subject to certain limitations, provide funds to its subsidiaries (whose operations consist principally of field title offices and ancillary services operations) for their operating and debt service needs.

We maintain investments in accordance with certain statutory requirements for the funding of statutory premium reserves. Statutory premium reserves are required to be fully funded and invested in high-quality securities and short-term investments. Statutory reserve funds are not available for current claims payments, which must be funded from current operating cash flow. Included in investments in debt and equity securities are statutory reserve funds of approximately $496.6 million at December 31, 2020. In addition, included within cash and cash equivalents are statutory reserve funds of approximately $20.0 million at December 31, 2020. Although these cash statutory reserve funds are not restricted or segregated in depository accounts, they are required to be held pursuant to state statutes. If the Company fails to maintain minimum investments or cash and cash equivalents sufficient to meet statutory requirements, the Company may be subject to fines or other penalties, including potential revocation of its business license. As of December 31, 2020, our known claims reserve totaled $68.9 million and our estimate of claims that may be reported in the future, under generally accepted accounting principles, totaled $427.4 million. In addition to this, we had cash and investments (excluding equity method investments) of $428.9 million which are available for underwriter operations, including claims payments.

The ability of Guaranty to pay dividends to its parent is governed by Texas insurance law. The TDI must be notified of any dividend declared, and any dividend in excess of the statutory maximum of 20% of surplus (which was approximately $158.9 million as of December 31, 2020) would be, by regulation, considered extraordinary and subject to pre-approval by the TDI. Also, the Texas Insurance Commissioner may raise an objection to a planned distribution during the notification period. Guaranty’s actual ability or intent to pay dividends to its parent may be constrained by business and regulatory considerations, such as the impact of dividends on surplus and the liquidity ratio, which could affect its ratings and competitive position, the amount of insurance it can write and its ability to pay future dividends. Guaranty paid dividends of $30.0 million to its parent during 2020 and none during 2019.

Contractual obligations. Our material contractual obligations at December 31, 2020 are composed primarily of amounts drawn on our line of credit facility, other notes payable, operating leases and reserves for estimated title losses. The timing above for payments of notes payable is based upon contractually stated payment terms of each debt agreement. At December 31, 2020, the outstanding balance on our line of credit facility is due in 2025. Other notes payable include short-term loan agreements in connection with our Section 1031 business (Section 1031 notes) and finance lease obligations. Operating leases are primarily for office space and expire over the next ten years. Refer to Note 10 (Notes payable) and Note 15 (Leases) to our audited consolidated financial statements for details on the annual maturity of related obligations.

24

In regard to the reserves for estimated title losses, the timing of payments is not set by contract. The actual timing of estimated title loss payments may vary since claims, by their nature, are complex and paid over long periods of time. Based on our historical payment patterns, approximately 77% of the outstanding reserves are paid out within six years. Refer to Note 11 (Estimated title losses) to our audited consolidated financial statements for details.

Cash flows. As the parent company conducts no operations apart from its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the discussion below focuses on consolidated cash flows. Refer to the consolidated statements of cash flows in the audited consolidated financial statements.

(in $ millions)

Net cash provided by operating activities 275.8 166.4 84.2

Net cash (used) provided by investing activities (231.4) 7.0 9.4

Net cash provided (used) by financing activities 54.3 (37.8) (47.8)

Operating activities. Our principal sources of cash from operations are premiums on title policies and revenue from title service-related transactions, ancillary services and other operations. Our independent agencies remit cash to us net of their contractual retention. Our principal cash expenditures for operations are employee costs, operating costs and title claims payments.

Net cash provided by operations in 2020 improved by $109.4 million compared to 2019, primarily due to the higher net income generated and lower claim payments in 2020. Net cash provided by operations in 2019 improved by $82.2 million compared to 2018, primarily due to the higher net income in 2019, which included the $50.0 million merger termination fee from FNF, partially offset by higher payments on claims. Although our business is labor intensive, we are focused on a cost-effective, scalable business model which includes utilization of technology, centralized back and middle office functions and business process outsourcing. We are continuing our emphasis on cost management, especially in light of the current economic environment due to the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically focusing on lowering unit costs of production and improving operating margins in all our businesses. Our plans to improve margins include additional automation of manual processes, and further consolidation of our various systems and production operations. We continue to invest in the technology necessary to accomplish these goals.

Investing activities. Cash used and provided by investing activities is primarily driven by proceeds from matured and sold investments, purchases of investments, capital expenditures and acquisition of title offices and other businesses. During 2020, 2019 and 2018, total proceeds from securities investments sold and matured were $96.0 million, $99.3 million and $79.1 million, respectively; while cash used for purchases of securities investments was $118.3 million, $77.5 million and $43.1 million, respectively. The higher purchases of securities investments in 2020 and 2019 were primarily due to our resumption to normal activity of investing in securities, following the relatively lower activity in 2018 when we invested more into cash equivalents and short-term investments, which had more favorable interest rates.

We used $200.0 million of cash in 2020 for acquisitions of several title offices and ancillary services businesses and also used $19.0 million of cash in 2018 for acquiring title offices; while we used $15.0 million, $17.1 million and $10.7 million of cash for purchases of property and equipment during 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. We maintain investment in capital expenditures at a level that enables us to implement technologies for increasing our operational and back-office efficiencies and to pursue growth in key markets.

Financing activities and capital resources. During 2020, we generated net proceeds of approximately $109.0 million from an issuance of new shares of Common Stock, which we used primarily for the acquisition of several title offices. During each of 2020, 2019 and 2018, we paid total dividends of $1.20 per common share, which aggregated to $30.2 million, $28.3 million and $28.3 million, respectively.

25

Total debt and stockholders’ equity were $101.8 million and $1.0 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2020. During 2020, 2019 and 2018, payments on notes payable of $23.8 million, $25.0 million and $16.3 million, respectively, and notes payable additions of $16.5 million, $30.5 million and $14.5 million, respectively, were related to short-term loan agreements in connection with our Section 1031 tax-deferred property exchange (Section 1031) business. As of December 31, 2020, the outstanding balance on the line of credit facility was $98.9 million, while the remaining balance of the line of credit available for use was $98.6 million, net of an unused $2.5 million letter of credit. Our debt-to-equity ratio at December 31, 2020, excluding our Section 1031 notes, was approximately 10.0%.

Effect of changes in foreign currency rates. The effect of changes in foreign currency rates on the consolidated statements of cash flows was a net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents of $3.3 million, $2.9 million and $(3.8) million in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Our principal foreign operating unit is in Canada, and the value of the Canadian dollar, on average and relative to the U.S. dollar, appreciated during 2020 and 2019, while it declined during 2018.

***********

We believe we have sufficient liquidity and capital resources to meet the cash needs of our ongoing operations. However, we may determine that additional debt or equity funding is warranted to provide liquidity for achievement of strategic goals or acquisitions or for unforeseen circumstances. Other than scheduled maturities of debt, operating lease payments and anticipated claims payments, we have no material contractual commitments. We expect that cash flows from operations and cash available from our underwriters, subject to regulatory restrictions, will be sufficient to fund our operations, including claims payments. However, to the extent that these funds are not sufficient, we may be required to borrow funds on terms less favorable than we currently have or seek funding from the equity market, which may not be successful or may be on terms that are dilutive to existing stockholders.

Other comprehensive income (loss). Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities investments and changes in foreign currency exchange rates are reported net of deferred taxes in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, a component of stockholders’ equity, until realized. Refer to Note 1-H to our audited consolidated financial statements for details.

In 2020, net unrealized investment gains of $14.9 million, net of taxes, which increased our other comprehensive income, were primarily related to increases in the fair values of our overall bond securities portfolio, mainly driven by the effect of lower interest rates and partially offset by higher credit spreads. The five-year U.S. treasury yield applicable on our investments decreased approximately 130 basis points in 2020 versus 2019, while the applicable credit spreads increased by approximately 70 basis points in 2020 compared to 2019. Also in 2020, we recorded foreign currency translation gains which increased our other comprehensive income by $4.8 million, net of taxes, which was primarily driven by the appreciation in value of the Canadian dollar and United Kingdom pound against the U.S. dollar in 2020.

In 2019, net unrealized investment gains of $15.6 million, net of taxes, which increased our other comprehensive income, were primarily related to increases in the fair values of our overall bond securities portfolio driven by reduced interest rates and credit spreads. The five-year U.S. treasury yield and applicable credit spreads on our investments decreased approximately 80 and 20 basis points, respectively, in 2019 compared to the prior year. Also in 2019, we recorded foreign currency translation gains which increased our other comprehensive income by $6.5 million, net of taxes, which was primarily driven by the appreciation in value of the Canadian dollar and United Kingdom pound against the U.S. dollar in 2019.

In 2018, net unrealized investment losses of $9.8 million, net of taxes, which increased our other comprehensive loss, were primarily related to temporary decreases in fair values of corporate bond securities investments driven by increases in the overall rate environment. Our net unrealized investment losses were consistent with the approximately 40 basis points increase of the five-year U.S. treasury yield, along with the approximately 40 basis points increase of applicable credit spreads on our investments in 2018. Also in 2018, we recorded foreign currency translation losses which increased our other comprehensive loss by $10.5 million, net of taxes, which was primarily driven by declines in the value of the Canadian dollar and United Kingdom pound against the U.S. dollar in 2018.

26

Off-balance sheet arrangements. We do not have any material source of liquidity or financing that involves off-balance sheet arrangements. We routinely hold funds in segregated escrow accounts relating to closing of real estate transactions that we service and tax-deferred property exchanges, pursuant to Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, where we serve as a qualified intermediary and hold the proceeds until the related qualifying exchange occurs. In accordance with industry practice, these segregated accounts are not included on our balance sheet. See Note 16 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 15 of Part IV of this report for details.

Cautionary statements regarding forward-looking statements. Certain statements in this report are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. Such forward-looking statements relate to future, not past, events and often address our expected future business and financial performance. These statements often contain words such as “may,” "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "believe," "seek," "will," "foresee" or other similar words. Forward-looking statements by their nature are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to be materially different than those expressed in the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, the volatility of economic conditions, including the duration and effects of the COVID-19 pandemic; adverse changes in the level of real estate activity; changes in mortgage interest rates, existing and new home sales, and availability of mortgage financing; our ability to respond to and implement technology changes, including the completion of the implementation of our enterprise systems; the impact of unanticipated title losses or the need to strengthen our policy loss reserves; any effect of title losses on our cash flows and financial condition; the ability to attract and retain highly productive sales associates; the impact of vetting our agency operations for quality and profitability; independent agency remittance rates; changes to the participants in the secondary mortgage market and the rate of refinancing that affects the demand for title insurance products; regulatory non-compliance, fraud or defalcations by our title insurance agencies or employees; our ability to timely and cost-effectively respond to significant industry changes and introduce new products and services; the outcome of pending litigation; the impact of changes in governmental and insurance regulations, including any future reductions in the pricing of title insurance products and services; our dependence on our operating subsidiaries as a source of cash flow; our ability to access the equity and debt financing markets when and if needed; our ability to grow our international operations; seasonality and weather; and our ability to respond to the actions of our competitors. All forward-looking statements included in this report are expressly qualified in their entirety by such cautionary statements. We expressly disclaim any obligation to update, amend or clarify any forward-looking statements contained in this report to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date hereof, except as may be required by applicable law.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The discussion below about our risk management strategies includes forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Management’s projections of hypothetical net losses in the fair values of our market rate-sensitive financial instruments, should certain potential changes in market rates occur, are presented below. While we believe that the potential market rate changes are possible, actual rate changes could differ from our projections. Although we are exposed to a currency exchange rate risk for our foreign operations, this risk is not material to Stewart’s financial condition or results of operations.

The material market risk in our investments in financial instruments is related to our debt securities investments, which represent approximately 92% of our total securities investment portfolio at December 31, 2020, with the remainder invested in equity securities. We invest primarily in corporate, foreign, municipal and U.S. government debt securities. We do not invest in financial instruments of a derivative or hedging nature. We have established policies and procedures to minimize our exposure to changes in the fair values of our investments. These policies include retaining an investment advisory firm, an emphasis upon credit quality, management of portfolio duration, maintaining or increasing investment income through high coupon rates and actively managing our risk profile and security mix depending upon market conditions. We have classified all of our debt securities investments as available-for-sale.

27

Investments in debt securities at December 31, 2020 mature, according to their contractual terms, as follows (actual maturities may differ because of call or prepayment rights):

Amortizedcosts Fairvalues

(in $ thousands)

We believe our investment portfolios are diversified and do not expect any material loss to result from the failure to perform by issuers of the debt securities we hold. Our investments are not collateralized. Foreign debt securities primarily include Canadian government and corporate bonds, United Kingdom treasury and corporate bonds and Mexican government bonds. Refer to Note 4 to our audited consolidated financial statements for details.

Based on our foreign debt securities portfolio and foreign currency exchange rates at December 31, 2020, a 100 basis-point increase (decrease) in foreign currency exchange rates would result in an increase (decrease) of approximately $2.6 million in the fair value of our foreign debt securities portfolio. We do not currently employ hedging strategies with respect to foreign currency risk as we do not consider this risk as material to the Company. In addition, our international businesses conduct substantially all of their operations in their respective local currencies. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates may affect the fair value of the debt securities portfolio and may result in unrealized gains or losses.

Based on our debt securities portfolio and interest rates at December 31, 2020, a 100 basis-point increase (decrease) in interest rates would result in a decrease (increase) of approximately $21.7 million, or 3.4%, in the fair value of our portfolio. Changes in interest rates may affect the fair value of the debt securities portfolio and may result in unrealized gains or losses.

Unrealized gains or losses on investments from changes in foreign currency exchange rates or interest rates would only be realized upon the sale of such investments. Fair value changes relating to equity securities and other-than-temporary declines in fair values of debt securities are charged to operations.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The information required to be provided in this item is included in our audited consolidated financial statements, including the Notes thereto, beginning on page F-1 of this report, and such information is incorporated in this report by reference.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

28

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Management's annual report on internal control over financial reporting. Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures. They evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of December 31, 2020 and have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures are adequate and effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process, under the supervision of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013). Based on this assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2020, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Due to such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

See page F-4 for the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on our effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2020 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. As a result, no corrective actions were required or undertaken.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

29

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Information regarding our directors and management team will be included in our proxy statement for our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Proxy Statement), which will be filed within 120 days after December 31, 2020, and is incorporated in this report by reference.

Our Board of Directors and Executive Team as of February 26, 2021 are:

Board of Directors:

Thomas G. Apel (Chairman) Chief Executive Officer of ADFITECH, Inc.

Frederick H. Eppinger Chief Executive Officer of Stewart

Matthew W. Morris Former Chief Executive Officer of Stewart

Executive Team:

Frederick H. Eppinger Chief Executive Officer

David C. Hisey Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

John L. Killea Chief Legal Officer and Chief Compliance Officer

Steve M. Lessack Group President

Tara S. Smith Group President

Brad A. Rable Chief Information Officer

Emily A. Kain Chief Human Resources Officer

The Board of Directors has adopted the Stewart Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Guidelines on Corporate Governance, as well as the Code of Ethics for Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. Each of these documents can be found at our website, www.stewart.com under Investor Relations.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Information regarding compensation for our executive officers will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated in this report by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated in this report by reference.

30

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Information regarding certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated in this report by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Information regarding fees paid to and services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm will be included in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated in this report by reference.

31

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules

The financial statements and financial statement schedules filed as part of this report are listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules of this document. All other schedules are omitted, as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.

(b)Exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed below.

Exhibit

32

Exhibit

21.1* — Subsidiaries of the Registrant at December 31, 2020

33

Exhibit

101.SCH* — XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL* — XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF* — XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB* — XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE* — XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

* Filed herewith

† Management contract or compensatory plan

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

None.

34

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we have duly caused this report to be signed on our behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

STEWART INFORMATION SERVICES CORPORATION

(Registrant)

By: /s/ Frederick H. Eppinger

Frederick H. Eppinger, Chief Executive Officer

By: /s/ David C. Hisey

David C. Hisey, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

By: /s/ Brian K. Glaze

Brian K. Glaze, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer

Date: February 26, 2021

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed on our behalf on February 26, 2021 by the following Directors:

/s/ Thomas G. Apel /s/ William S. Corey, Jr. /s/ Matthew W. Morris

(Thomas G. Apel) (William S. Corey, Jr.) (Matthew W. Morris)

/s/ Clifford Allen Bradley Jr. /s/ Frederick H. Eppinger /s/ Karen R. Pallotta

(Clifford Allen Bradley) (Frederick H. Eppinger) (Karen R. Pallotta)

/s/ Robert L. Clarke /s/ Deborah J. Matz /s/ Manuel Sanchez

(Robert L. Clarke) (Deborah J. Matz) (Manuel Sanchez)

35

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm F - 2

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 F - 7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F - 11

Financial Statement Schedules:

Schedule I - Financial Information of the Registrant (Parent Company) S - 1

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts S - 5

1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors

Stewart Information Services Corporation:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Stewart Information Services Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, cash flows, and equity for each of the years in the three‐year period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes and financial statement schedules I and II (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three‐year period ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 26, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases as of January 1, 2019 due to the adoption of ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, which requires lessees to recognize leases on balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

F - 2

Evaluation of the liability for estimated title losses

As discussed in notes 1E and 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the liability for estimated title losses represents the aggregate future payments (net of recoveries) that the Company expects to make on title insurance policy losses and certain costs to settle claims that have been incurred as of the balance sheet date. The Company calculates the liability for estimated title losses by adjusting prior period’s ending reserve balance for the current year provision for estimated title losses and actual claim payments. The Company calculates the current year provision for estimated title losses by determining current period loss provision rates and applying them to the Company’s current premiums, except for large claims and escrow losses, which are considered separately. Management analyzes the difference between the internally-calculated liability for estimated title losses and a third-party actuarially-derived liability. Factors considered as part of this analysis include actual claim payments and incurred loss experience, including the frequency and severity of claims, compared to actuarial estimates of claim payments and incurred losses, as well as the impact of the economic and real estate market environment on particular policy years. As of December 31, 2020, the balance of the liability for estimated title losses was $496 million.

We identified the evaluation of the liability for estimated title losses for certain lines of business as a critical audit matter. Specifically, the evaluation of the selection of loss provision rates used in the valuation of the liability for estimated title losses required subjective auditor judgment. The significant judgment was primarily due to the subjectivity of management’s estimates in relation to recent historical loss trends and the economic and real estate market environment.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address the critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls over the Company’s estimation of title losses. This included controls related to (1) the Company’s assessment of estimated losses based on selected loss provision rates used in determining the liability for estimated title losses; and (2) the Company’s assessment of the recorded liability for estimated title losses in relation to the estimate developed by the third-party actuary. We involved actuarial professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:

•Assessing loss provision rates selected by the Company in relation to recent historical loss payment/premium trends and the economic and real estate market environment;

•Comparing the third-party actuary reserving methodologies to generally accepted actuarial standards and assessing the actuarial methods and assumptions used, in relation to recent historical loss payment/premium trends and the economic and real estate market environment;

•Developing a range of estimates of the liability for estimated title losses using the Company’s underlying historical claims data for certain lines of business, and comparing the liability for estimated title losses recorded by the Company to our independent range; and

•Assessing the year-over-year movements of the Company’s liability for estimated title losses within our range.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1980.

Houston, Texas

February 26, 2021

F - 3

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors

Stewart Information Services Corporation:

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Stewart Information Services Corporation and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, cash flows, and equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes and financial statement schedules I and II (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 26, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting included in Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

F - 4

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas

February 26, 2021

F - 5

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the Years Ended December 31,

(in $ thousands, except per share amounts)

Revenues

Title revenues:

Net realized and unrealized (losses) gains (1,678) 42,760 53

Expenses

Less net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 14,767 11,657 11,499

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes:

Change in net unrealized gains and losses on investments 15,443 15,184 (8,922)

Basic earnings per share attributable to Stewart 6.25 3.33 2.02

Diluted earnings per share attributable to Stewart 6.22 3.31 2.01

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F - 6

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of December 31,

(in $ thousands)

Assets

Investments in debt and equity securities, at fair value:

Receivables:

Allowance for uncollectible amounts (4,807) (4,469)

Property and equipment, at cost:

Investments in investees, on an equity method basis 6,765 6,169

Intangible assets, net of amortization 37,382 4,623

Liabilities

Contingent liabilities and commitments

Stockholders’ equity

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):

Foreign currency translation adjustments (8,238) (13,027)

Net unrealized gains on debt securities investments 25,260 10,328

Total stockholders’ equity attributable to Stewart 1,005,112 747,306

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F - 7

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended December 31,

(in $ thousands)

Reconciliation of net income to cash provided by operating activities:

Add (deduct):

Net realized and unrealized losses (gains) 1,678 7,240 (53)

Amortization of net premium on debt securities investments 4,261 4,939 6,083

Adjustments for insurance recoveries of title losses 228 181 1,039

(Increase) decrease in receivables – net (6,598) (2,917) 5,280

(Increase) decrease in other assets – net (5,380) 6,865 4,469

Investing activities:

Net sales (purchases) of short-term investments 3,894 (639) 392

Net cash paid for acquisition of businesses (199,537) — (18,739)

Financing activities:

Purchase of remaining interest of consolidated subsidiaries — — (1,101)

Issuance of Common Stock 108,961 — —

Effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates 3,337 2,905 (3,810)

F - 8

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended December 31,

(in $ thousands)

Supplemental information:

Receivables and other assets acquired 13,677 — 1,209

Net realized gains on the transactions — — (208)

Net cash paid for acquisition of subsidiaries and other assets 199,537 — 18,739

Assets purchased through capital lease obligations — — 4,312

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F - 9

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

(in $ thousands)

Net income attributable to Stewart — — — 47,523 — — 47,523

Dividends on Common Stock ($1.20 per share) — — — (28,565) — — (28,565)

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests — — — — — 11,499 11,499

Distributions to noncontrolling interests — — — — — (11,631) (11,631)

Net income attributable to Stewart — — — 78,615 — — 78,615

Dividends on Common Stock ($1.20 per share) — — — (28,471) — — (28,471)

Stock repurchases (13) (519) — — — — (532)

Foreign currency translation adjustments (net of tax) — — 6,478 — — — 6,478

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests — — — — — 11,657 11,657

Distributions to noncontrolling interests — — — — — (11,506) (11,506)

Net effect of changes in ownership and other — — — — — (10) (10)

Dividends on Common Stock ($1.20 per share) — — — (30,478) — — (30,478)

Foreign currency translation adjustments (net of tax) — — 4,789 — — — 4,789

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests — — — — — 14,767 14,767

Distributions to noncontrolling interests — — — — — (13,944) (13,944)

Net effect of changes in ownership and other — — — — — 18 18

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F - 10

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Three Years Ended December 31, 2020

Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain) · 10-K for the period ended 2020-12-31, filed 2021-03-01 · accession 0000094344-21-000009

Filing HTML rendered to line-structured narrative text by the shipped reducer (datafeeds.edgar_fulltext.visible_text, keep_table_headers=True): scripts and inline-XBRL headers are dropped, and table content is reduced to its short label cells — numeric table data is not rendered and is therefore not counted. The same rendering is used for every year, so a year-over-year comparison is like for like.

The text is our rendering of the filing, not a facsimile: original pagination, typography and tables are not reproduced, and the numbers live in the financial statements (FA).

The outline locates item HEADINGS in this document. Only Items 1A and 7 have certified boundaries elsewhere in the terminal (the redline and the narrative-overlap number); every span here runs from one heading found to the next heading found.

How the outline was chosen. It is the longest chain of item headings that runs forward through both the document and the standard item order: 20 headings are on that chain and 0 further heading-shaped lines are not — the table-of-contents echo of every item, cross-references and exhibit-list mentions. Each entry's length is measured from its heading to the next heading on the chain.