| Size & multiples | |||
| Market Cap | $36.6M | Enterprise Value | $654.8M |
| P/E (TTM) | — | PEG (trailing) | — |
| P/S | 0.33× | P/FCF | 13.23× |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.21× | EV/EBIT | 27.88× |
| EV/Sales | 5.88× | EV/FCF | 236.99× |
| FCF Yield | 7.56% | Buyback Yield | — |
| Owner Earnings (TTM) | $16.4M | Owner Earnings Yield | 44.87% |
| Shareholder Yield | — | ||
| Cost of capital & EVAmethodology → | |||
| Beta (5y monthly) | 0.98 | Risk-free (assumed) | 4.00% |
| Equity risk premium (assumed) | 5.00% | Cost of Equity | 8.92% |
| After-tax Cost of Debt | — | Synthetic credit rating | D |
| Cost of Debt · embedded (pre-tax) | 7.56% | Cost of Debt · marginal (synthetic) | 23.00% |
| WACC | — | ROIC | — |
| EVA Spread (ROIC−WACC) | — | EVA | — |
FCF sits 83% below owner earnings — spending above maintenance (growth capex) or absorbing working capital, so FCF understates the steady-state cash the business throws off.
Synthetic rating = ICR-based credit-quality read (Damodaran), not an agency rating.
Flows TTM (last 4 quarters); latest annual for: EPS (Diluted) · EPS TTM -$1.44 · revenue TTM $111.4M · FCF TTM $2.8M
Output of a disclosed model whose assumptions may be wrong — research information, not investment advice. See the Disclaimer.
Rich vs Utilities on EV/EBITDA
EV/EBITDA 67th percentile in the Utilities pool — placement read per multiple; the API emits no single blended figure, so none is shown.
Compared against all 161 Utilities names we cover — one sector-wide pool, so the median skews toward smaller (often unprofitable) companies. Try the Size band for a cap-matched read.
| Metric | This (FY) | Peer median | IQR (25–75) | %ile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV/EBITDA | 13.7x | 12.0x | 9.5x–14.3x | 67 ↑rich |
| FCF Yield | -10.3% | -1.6% | -6.5%–2.8% | 16 ↓weak |
| Net Margin | -23.3% | 12.5% | 6.4%–18.2% | 8 ↓weak |
| Operating Margin | 16.0% | 21.2% | 11.0%–27.7% | 34 ↓weak |
