| Size & multiples | |||
| Market Cap | $703.1M | Enterprise Value | $1.35B |
| P/E (TTM) | — | PEG (trailing) | — |
| P/S | 1.94× | P/FCF | — |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.57× | EV/EBIT | — |
| EV/Sales | 3.74× | EV/FCF | — |
| FCF Yield | −35.08% | Buyback Yield | — |
| Owner Earnings (TTM) | -$32.9M | Owner Earnings Yield | −4.69% |
| Shareholder Yield | — | ||
| Cost of capital & EVAmethodology → | |||
| Beta (5y monthly) | 0.65 | Risk-free (assumed) | 4.00% |
| Equity risk premium (assumed) | 5.00% | Cost of Equity | 7.23% |
| After-tax Cost of Debt | — | WACC | — |
| ROIC | −1.32% | EVA Spread (ROIC−WACC) | — |
| EVA | — | ||
FCF sits 649% below owner earnings — spending above maintenance (growth capex) or absorbing working capital, so FCF understates the steady-state cash the business throws off.
Flows TTM (last 4 quarters); latest annual for: EPS (Diluted), Net Income · EPS TTM -$0.71 · revenue TTM $362.1M · FCF TTM -$246.7M
Output of a disclosed model whose assumptions may be wrong — research information, not investment advice. See the Disclaimer.
Rich vs Communication Services on EV/EBITDA
EV/EBITDA 61st percentile in the Communication Services pool — placement read per multiple; the API emits no single blended figure, so none is shown.
Compared against all 267 Communication Services names we cover — one sector-wide pool, so the median skews toward smaller (often unprofitable) companies. Try the Size band for a cap-matched read.
| Metric | This (FY) | Peer median | IQR (25–75) | %ile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV/EBITDA | 12.3x | 9.8x | 6.7x–19.3x | 61 ↑rich |
| FCF Yield | -36.7% | 5.1% | -2.6%–11.0% | 8 ↓weak |
| Dividend Yield | 0.9% | 1.4% | 0.1%–4.5% | 40 ↓weak |
| Net Margin | -9.2% | 1.9% | -12.4%–11.9% | 27 ↓weak |
| Operating Margin | -6.5% | 4.4% | -9.4%–14.2% | 28 ↓weak |
| ROE | -3.7% | 5.0% | -10.4%–15.3% | 30 ↓weak |
