Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

Sports Entertainment Gaming Global Corp SEGG US Equity

Information Technology · CIK 1673481 · FY ends Dec 31
$2.83
+0.10 (+3.66%)
USD · as of 2026-08-28 · marketstack

Sports Entertainment Gaming Global Corp (Nasdaq: SEGG), an SEC filer in Services-Prepackaged Software, closed at $2.83, +3.7%, on 2026-08-28, with a market cap of $9M as of 2026-08-27, a return on equity of -102.7%, a net margin of -2648.0% and 3-year sales growth of -59.8%. Institutional ownership, earnings history and filed financials are on the tabs below.

SEGG · 10-K · period ended 2020-12-31

← all SEGG documents
filed 2021-03-30 · EDGAR original ↗

Our rendering of the filing — original pagination and typography are not reproduced, and tables are reduced to their short label cells (the figures live on FA). Nothing is summarized: every line below is the filing's own text.

blocks 1600 of 2,556238k characters rendered

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December

31, 2020

or

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____________

to ________________

Commission file number: 001-38508

TRIDENT ACQUISITIONS CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in

its charter)

(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

77 Water St., 8th Floor New York, NY 10005

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including

area code: (646)229-7549

Securities registered pursuant to Section

12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered

Common stock, $0.001 par value per share TDAC NASDAQ Capital Market

Warrants TDACW NASDAQ Capital Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section

12(g) of the Act: None.

Indicate

by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐No☒

Indicate

by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange

Act. Yes ☐No☒

Indicate

by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such

reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes☒

No ☐

Indicate

by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant

to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the

registrant was required to submit such files). Yes☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant

is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth

company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller

reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐

Non-accelerated filer ☒ Smaller reporting company ☒

Emerging Growth Company ☒

If

an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for

complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate

by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness

of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered

public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

Indicate

by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes

☒ No ☐

At June 30, 2020, the aggregate market

value of the Registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $62,493,876.

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common

stock as of March 22, 2021 was 11,967,720.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

TRIDENT ACQUISITIONS CORP.

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year

Ended December 31, 2020

PART I 1

ITEM 1. BUSINESS 1

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS 17

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS 17

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES 17

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 17

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES 17

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 19

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 23

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 23

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 23

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION 24

PART III 25

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 25

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 31

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES 38

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES 39

i

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains

forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act. The statements contained in this report that are not purely historical

are forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our or our

management’s expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future. In addition, any statements that

refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions,

are forward-looking statements. The words “anticipates,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,”

“estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,”

“possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “would”

and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement

is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements in this report may include, for example, statements about our:

● ability to complete our initial business combination with Lottery.com;

● pool of prospective target businesses;

● the potential liquidity and trading of our securities;

● the lack of a market for our securities;

● financial performance following our initial public offering.

The forward-looking statements contained

in this report are based on our current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects on

us. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those that we have anticipated. These forward-looking

statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond our control) or other assumptions that may cause

actual results or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These

risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those factors described under the heading “Risk Factors.”

Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of our assumptions prove incorrect, actual results

may vary in material respects from those projected in these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or

revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required

under applicable securities laws and/or if and when management knows or has a reasonable basis on which to conclude that previously

disclosed projections are no longer reasonably attainable.

ii

CERTAIN TERMS

Unless otherwise stated, references to:

● “we,” “us” or “our company” refer to Trident Acquisitions Corp.;

● our “management” or our “management team” refer to our officers and directors;

iii

PART I

Item 1. Business.

Introduction

We are a blank check company formed under

the laws of the State of Delaware on March 17, 2016. We were formed for the purpose of entering into a merger, share exchange,

asset acquisition, stock purchase, recapitalization, reorganization or other similar business combination, with one or more target

businesses. To date, our efforts have been limited to organizational activities, completing our initial public offering, searching

for a target business to acquire and activities in connection with the proposed acquisition of AutoLotto, Inc. (“Lottery.com”),

which is described below. If the transaction with Lottery.com does not close, our efforts to identify a prospective target business

will not be limited to any particular industry or geographic region, although we intend to focus our search on target businesses

operating in oil and gas or other natural resources companies in Eastern Europe or interested in expanding into Eastern Europe.

As Europe is striving to achieve energy

independence, we believe that Eastern European oil and gas deposits, which are small and technically difficult to access, will

attract the interest of investors and governments. We believe that historical exploration data can be reassessed with new geological

knowledge to determine which reserves that were previously considered unrecoverable or uneconomic can be profitably recovered.

Initial Public Offering

On June 1, 2018, we consummated our initial

public offering of 17,500,000 Units, with each Unit consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant (the “Initial

Public Offering”). On June 5, 2018, we sold an additional 2,625,000 Units pursuant to the underwriters fully exercising their

over-allotment option. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share common stock at a price of $11.50 per share. Each

warrant will become exercisable on the later of 30 days after the completion of our initial business combination (the “Business

Combination”) or 12 months from the closing of the Initial Public Offering. The warrants will expire five years after the

completion of our initial Business Combination or earlier upon redemption or liquidation. Once the warrants issued in connection

with the Initial Public Offering become exercisable, we may redeem those outstanding warrants in whole and not in part at a price

of $0.01 per warrant upon a minimum of 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption, but if, and only if, the last sale price

of our common stock equals or exceeds $16.00 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period ending on the third

trading day prior to the date on which we send the notice of redemption to the warrant holders. The Units in the Initial Public

Offering were sold at an offering price of $10.00 per Unit, generating total gross proceeds of $201,250,000.

In connection with the Initial Public Offering,

we also sold to Chardan Capital Markets LLC, the representative of the underwriters (“Chardan”), for $100,

an option to purchase up to a total of 1,750,000 Units exercisable at $10.00 per unit commencing on the consummation of a Business

Combination. The units issuable upon exercise of this option are identical to the Units sold in the Initial Public Offering.

After deducting the underwriting fee (excluding

the deferred underwriting commission of $5,031,250, which amount will be payable upon consummation of the Business Combination,

if consummated) and the Initial Public Offering expenses, the total net proceeds from our Initial Public Offering and the sale

of the Private Units was $206,679,386 of which $205,275,000 (or $10.20 per Unit sold in the Initial Public Offering) was placed

in the trust account.

Proposed Business Combination with Lottery.com

On February 21, 2021, we entered into a

business combination agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) with Trident Merger Sub II Corp. (“Merger Sub”)

and AutoLotto, Inc. (“Lottery.com”). Upon the closing (the “Closing”) of the business combination with

Lottery.com, Merger Sub will merge with and into Lottery.com, with Lottery.com as the surviving company, continuing as our wholly

owned subsidiary, following the transaction and the separate existence of Merger Sub shall cease. At the Closing, each share of

Lottery.com common stock issued and outstanding as of immediately prior to the Closing shall be converted into the right to receive

the Per Share Merger Consideration. “Per Share Merger Consideration” means the quotient obtained by dividing (a) 40,000,000

shares of our common stock by (b) the aggregate number of shares of Lottery.com common stock (including shares issued upon the

conversion or exercise of Lottery.com convertible securities) issued and outstanding as of immediately prior to the Closing (the

“Lottery.com Shares”). The Per Share Merger Consideration shall be reduced by the number of shares of our common stock

equal to the quotient of (i) the amount by which Net Indebtedness exceeds $10,000,000, as mutually agreed between us and Lottery.com

(each acting reasonably), divided by (ii) 11.00. “Net Indebtedness” means the amount equal to Lottery.com’s Indebtedness,

less cash and cash equivalents. For the avoidance of doubt, Lottery.com’s Indebtedness shall not include current liabilities

or any intercompany Indebtedness between or among Lottery.com and any of its subsidiaries.

The holders of the Lottery.com Shares (the

“Sellers”) will also be entitled to receive up to 6,000,000 additional shares of our common stock (the “Seller

Earnout Shares”) that may be issuable from time to time as set forth below. The aggregate value of the consideration to be

paid by us in the business combination (excluding the Seller Earnout Shares) is approximately $444 million (calculated as follows:

40,000,000 shares of our common stock to be issued to the Sellers, multiplied by $11.00). Upon the Closing, we will change

our name to “Lottery.com.”

If, at any time on or prior to December

31, 2021, the daily volume-weighted average price of shares of our common stock equals or exceeds $13.00 per share for 20 of any

30 consecutive trading days commencing after the Closing, each Seller shall receive its pro rata portion of 3,000,000 Seller Earnout

Shares and Vadim Komissarov, Ilya Ponomarev and Marat Rosenberg (the “Founder Holders”) shall receive an aggregate

of 2,000,000 shares of our common stock. If, at any time on or prior to December 31, 2022, the daily volume-weighted average price

of shares of our common stock equals or exceeds $16.00 per share for 20 of any 30 consecutive trading days commencing after the

Closing, each Seller shall receive its pro rata portion of 3,000,000 Seller Earnout Shares and the Founder Holders shall receive

an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of our common stock. The Seller Earnout Shares then earned and issuable shall be issued to the

Sellers on a pro-rata basis based on the percentage of the Lottery.com Shares owned by them immediately prior to the Closing.

The parties agreed that immediately following

the Closing, our board of directors will consist of five directors, four of which will be designated by Lottery.com and one of

which will be designated by us, such appointment by us to be an independent director. The boards of directors of each of us and

Lottery.com have unanimously approved this business combination. The transaction will require the approval of our stockholders

and of Lottery.com, the effectiveness of a registration statement on Form S-4 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission

(the “SEC”) in connection with the transaction, satisfaction of the conditions stated in the Merger Agreement and other

customary closing conditions.

Extensions of Time Period to Complete

a Business Combination

On November 26, 2019, we held our Annual Meeting of

the Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) at which the stockholders approved a proposal to amend our Amended and Restated Certificate

of Incorporation (the “Charter Amendment”) to extend the period of time for which we are required to complete a Business Combination

two times for an additional 90 days each time to June 1, 2020 (the termination date as so extended, the “Extended Termination Date”).

Our stockholders were able to elect to redeem their shares in connection with the Annual Meeting for a pro rata portion of the amount

then on deposit in the trust account ($10.00 per share, plus any pro rata interest earned on the funds held in the trust account and not

previously released to us to pay franchise and income taxes). With respect to public shares not redeemed in connection with the Annual

Meeting, we agreed to make a cash contribution of $500,000 to the trust account for each 90-day extension. As of March 31, 2020, we had

contributed an aggregate of $1,000,015 to the trust account and extended the time to complete a Business Combination to June 1, 2020.

In connection with the approval of the

Charter Amendment, stockholders elected to redeem an aggregate of 13,081,434 shares of our common stock. As a result, an aggregate

of approximately $137,130,484 (or approximately $10.48 per share) was removed from our trust account to pay such stockholders,

and 13,224,816 shares of common stock were then issued and outstanding following such redemption.

On May 28, 2020, we held a Special Meeting

of the Stockholders at which the stockholders approved a proposal to amend our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation

(the “Second Charter Amendment”) to extend the period of time for which we are required to complete a Business Combination

to September 1, 2020 (the “Second Extended Date”). We made a cash contribution of $962,476 to the trust account for

the three-month extension period. In addition, the stockholders elected to redeem an aggregate of 627,059 shares of our common

stock. As a result, an aggregate of $6,666,775 (or approximately $10.63 per share) was removed from our trust account to pay such

stockholders and 12,597,757 shares of common stock were then issued and outstanding following such redemption.

On August 28, 2020, we held a Special Meeting

of the Stockholders at which the stockholders approved a proposal to amend our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation

(the “Third Charter Amendment”) to extend the period of time for which we are required to complete a Business Combination

to December 1, 2020 (the “Third Extended Date”). We made a cash contribution of $867,971 to the trust account for the

three-month extension period. In addition, the stockholders elected to redeem an aggregate of 630,037 shares of our common stock.

As a result, an aggregate of $6,781,851 (or approximately $10.76 per share) was removed from our trust account to pay such stockholders

and 11,967,720 shares of common stock were then issued and outstanding following such redemption.

On November 30, 2020, we held a Special

Meeting of Stockholders, pursuant to which the stockholders approved the extension to the Third Extended Date from December 1,

2020 to March 1, 2021, with an ability to further extend for an additional three months to June 1, 2021 (the “Fourth Extended

Date”) if approved by our board of directors. We agreed to contribute $0.05 for each Public Share outstanding that was not

redeemed for each month of the extension going forward. On December 1, 2020, we contributed an aggregate of $289,323 to the trust

account. On February 26, 2021, our board of directors approved the extension of the Fourth Extended Date to June 1, 2021

to permit sufficient time for us to consummate our proposed business combination with Lottery.com, including filing a registration

statement on Form S-4 that will include a proxy statement.

Market Overview

Europe has well developed industries and

a large population, although it experiences a deficit of energy resources. Until 2040, European net imports of gas are projected

to grow due to transition away from coal and nuclear energy, and are currently in excess of 310 billion cubic meters of gas per

annum.

All of the European states except Norway

and Romania are energy-dependent. Traditionally, Europe relied on oil and gas coming from four major sources: The Middle East,

Russia, North Africa and Norway. While the largest supplier for Western Europe is currently Norway, almost all of the energy for

Eastern Europe comes from Russia (35% of all European consumption of natural gas is delivered by Gazprom).

Russia’s recent military and political

offensive in Ukraine has triggered an intense desire within the European Union to secure energy independence. War in Ukraine is

feared to be disruptive for major gas pipelines from Russia to the European Union (2/3 of Gazprom’s total supply). In July

2017, U.S. President Donald Trump stood beside his Polish counterpart, Andrzej Duda, in Warsaw and promised to help wean the nation

off Russian energy imports, “so that you can never be held hostage to a single supplier.”

Promising deposits are located within three

regions: Western (Germany, France, UK); Central (Poland, Lithuania, Western Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, Slovakia, Hungary, Serbia);

and Eastern (Eastern Ukraine). The Western region will be unlikely to be developed within the foreseeable future because of political

reasons in host countries (with the exception of the UK, but its potential is the smallest among three) and the Eastern region,

which currently produces more oil and gas than the other regions, is located near the Russia-Ukraine border, which makes it unattractive

for additional near-term investment. That leaves the Central region as the area of development on which we intend to focus.

Two of the most promising countries in

Europe for exploration and development of oil and gas are Ukraine and Poland.

Ukraine

Ukraine has three separate basins that

have oil and gas deposits. Although not widely known, Ukraine was a major gas producing region in the Soviet Union until late 1970s,

when new fields in Western Siberia were developed. Production was cut not because of depletion, but because of difficult reservoir

characteristics and military risks (the proximity to Western borders of USSR). After Ukraine claimed its independence in 1991,

there was virtually no additional development.

Naftogaz of Ukraine: http://www.naftogaz.com/www/3/nakweben.nsf/0/69CDD708EEFC16B4C22570D8003432CC/$file/small5.jpg

Ukraine’s Eastern basin was a focus

for Shell, but war with Russia has disrupted exploration drilling in the area. Ukraine’s Western basin was of interest to

Chevron, but it decided to shut down its European explorations altogether, including exploration in Romania and Ukraine, to focus

on already discovered offshore properties due to low energy prices. The Southern basin is located next to Odessa, and stretches

from onshore (primarily oil) to offshore (more gas) Black Sea locations. Active exploration in the areas adjacent to Romania and

Crimea are carried by ExxonMobil, OMV, and Lukoil.

New Ukrainian laws recently significantly

decreased the tax rate for royalty payments. As major oil and gas companies failed develop economic quantities of oil, small

companies have found their niches in both Eastern and Western Ukraine, and many produce commercially, despite the continuing crisis

with Russia.

Poland

Chevron, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil and

Marathon were all developing assets in Poland until recently. Each of them has decided not to pursue development because they did

not feel that they could be commercially successful. National oil & gas company PGNiG is still active and producing limited

quantities of hydrocarbons.

We believe that the weak results of the

first wells drilled by major oil companies can be explained by, among other things, the size and bureaucratic nature of large oil

companies, which increased their costs of producing oil and gas to such an extent that it made the region uneconomic at current

prices for oil and gas.

Our Investment Strategy

If the transaction with Lottery.com does

not close, we want to take advantage of privately held Eastern European oil and gas operating companies that have significant production

volume and positive cash flows, but little or no reserves. By acquiring a company with undeveloped reserves and hiring companies

that have engineering and geological expertise to develop the reserves, we believe that we will be able to create value for our

investors.

We anticipate targeting companies with

recoverable reserves in Romania, Poland, Ukraine and other Eastern European countries. We also intend to target companies with

operations outside of Eastern Europe that are interested in expanding in Eastern Europe.

Our Team

Our executive officers and directors have

extensive experience in starting and managing industrial businesses in Eastern Europe, in particular in the energy sector. As a

group, they combine Western business practice experience and technical know-how with extensive government and business networks

that are crucial to success in the region. Our officers and directors also have extensive experience in identifying, negotiating

with and conducting due diligence on companies targeted for acquisition and consummating acquisitions of energy companies. Our

management team, however, does not have prior experience in pursuing acquisitions on behalf of blank check companies and past performance

by our management team is not a guarantee of success with respect to locating a target business to acquire.

Subsequent to the consummation of our initial

business combination, we believe that the strengths of our management team, particularly their international experience and technical

knowhow, will be valuable to any business in Ukraine with which we consummate our initial business combination, although the specific

roles, if any, they may have following our initial business combination cannot be determined at this time.

Competitive Strengths

We believe our competitive strengths to

be the following:

Status as a public company

We believe our structure will make us an

attractive business combination partner to target businesses. As an existing public company, we offer a target business an alternative

to the traditional initial public offering through a merger or other business combination. In this situation, the owners of the

target business would exchange their shares of stock in the target business for shares of our stock or for a combination of shares

of our stock and cash, allowing us to tailor the consideration to the specific needs of the sellers. We believe target businesses

might find this method a more certain and cost effective method to becoming a public company than the typical initial public offering.

In a typical initial public offering, there are additional expenses incurred in marketing, roadshow and public reporting efforts

that will likely not be present to the same extent in connection with a business combination with us. Furthermore, once the business

combination is consummated, the target business will have effectively become public, whereas an initial public offering is always

subject to the underwriters’ ability to complete the offering, as well as general market conditions that could prevent the

offering from occurring. Once public, we believe the target business would then have greater access to capital and an additional

means of providing management incentives consistent with stockholders’ interests than it would have as a privately-held company.

It can offer further benefits by augmenting a company’s profile among potential new customers and vendors and aid in attracting

talented employees.

While we believe that our status as a public

company will make us an attractive business partner, some potential target businesses may view the inherent limitations in our

status as a blank check company, such as our lack of an operating history and our requirements to seek stockholder approval of

any proposed initial business combination and provide holders of public shares the opportunity to convert their shares into cash

from the trust account, as a deterrent and may prefer to effect a business combination with a more established entity or with a

private company.

Transaction flexibility

We offer a target business a variety of

options such as providing the owners of a target business with shares in a public company and a public means to sell such shares,

providing cash for stock, and providing capital for the potential growth and expansion of its operations or strengthening its balance

sheet by reducing its debt ratio. Because we are able to consummate our initial business combination using our cash, debt or equity

securities, or a combination of the foregoing, we have the flexibility to use the most efficient combination that will allow us

to tailor the consideration to be paid to the target business to fit its needs and desires. However, we have not taken any steps

to secure third party financing and it may not be available to us.

Competitive Weaknesses

We believe our competitive weaknesses to

be the following:

Limited Financial Resources

Our financial reserves will be relatively

limited when contrasted with those of venture capital firms, leveraged buyout firms and operating businesses competing for acquisitions.

In addition, our financial resources could be reduced because of our obligation to convert shares held by our public stockholders

as well as any tender offer we conduct.

Lack of experience with blank check companies

Our management team is not experienced

in pursuing business combinations on behalf of blank check companies. Other blank check companies may be sponsored and managed

by individuals with prior experience in completing business combinations between blank check companies and target businesses. Our

managements’ lack of experience may not be viewed favorably by target businesses.

Limited technical and human resources

As a blank check company, we have limited

technical and human resources. Many venture capital funds, leveraged buyout firms and operating businesses possess greater technical

and human resources than we do and thus we may be at a disadvantage when competing with them for target businesses.

Delay associated with stockholder approval or tender offer

We may be required to seek stockholder

approval of our initial business combination. If we are not required to obtain stockholder approval of an initial business combination,

we will allow our stockholders to sell their shares to us pursuant to a tender offer. Both seeking stockholder approval and conducting

a tender offer will delay the consummation of our initial business combination. Other companies competing with us for acquisition

opportunities may not be subject to similar requirement, or may be able to satisfy such requirements more quickly than we can.

As a result, we may be at a disadvantage in competing for these opportunities.

Effecting Our Initial Business Combination

General

We are not presently engaged in, and we

will not engage in, any substantive commercial business until we close a business combination. We intend to utilize cash derived

from the proceeds our initial public offering, the sale of our private units, our capital stock, debt or a combination of these

in effecting our initial business combination. Although substantially all of the net proceeds of our initial public offering are

intended to be applied generally toward effecting a business, the proceeds are not otherwise being designated for any more specific

purposes. Our initial business combination may involve the acquisition of, or merger with, a company which does not need substantial

additional capital but which desires to establish a public trading market for its shares. In the alternative, we may seek to consummate

a business combination with a company that may be financially unstable or in its early stages of development or growth. While we

may seek to effect simultaneous business combinations with more than one target business, we will probably have the ability, as

a result of our limited resources, to effect only a single business combination.

Sources of Target Businesses

If the transaction with Lottery.com does

not close, we believe based on our management’s business knowledge and past experience that there are numerous business combination

candidates. We anticipate that target business candidates will be brought to our attention from various unaffiliated sources, including

investment bankers, venture capital funds, private equity funds, leveraged buyout funds, management buyout funds and other members

of the financial community. Target businesses may be brought to our attention by such unaffiliated sources as a result of being

solicited by us through calls or mailings. These sources may also introduce us to target businesses in which they think we may

be interested on an unsolicited basis. Our officers and directors, as well as their affiliates, may also bring to our attention

target business candidates that they become aware of through their business contacts as a result of formal or informal inquiries

or discussions they may have, as well as attending trade shows or conventions. We may engage professional firms or other individuals

that specialize in business acquisitions or mergers in the future, in which event we may pay a finder’s fee, consulting fee

or other compensation to be determined in an arm’s length negotiation based on the terms of the transaction. Except for the

$7,500 per month administrative services fee, in no event will our insiders or any of the members of our management team be paid

any finder’s fee, consulting fee or other compensation prior to, or for any services they render in order to effectuate,

the consummation of our initial business combination (regardless of the type of transaction that it is). We have no present intention

to enter into a business combination with a target business that is affiliated with any of our officers, directors, director nominees

or insiders. However, we are not restricted from entering into any such transactions and may do so if (1) such transaction is approved

by a majority of our disinterested and independent directors (if we have any at that time) and (2) we obtain an opinion from an

independent investment banking firm that the business combination is fair to our unaffiliated stockholders from a financial point

of view.

Selection of a Target Business and Structuring of Our Initial

Business Combination

Subject to our management team’s

fiduciary duties and the limitation that one or more target businesses have an aggregate fair market value of at least 80% of the

value of the trust account (excluding any deferred underwriter’s fees and taxes payable on the income earned on the trust

account) at the time of the execution of a definitive agreement for our initial business combination, as described below in more

detail, our management will have virtually unrestricted flexibility in identifying and selecting a prospective target business.

While the fair market value of the target business must satisfy the 80% test, the consideration we pay the owners of the target

business may be a combination of cash (whether cash from the trust account or cash from a debt or equity financing transaction

that closes concurrently with the business combination) or our equity securities. The exact nature and amount of consideration

would be determined based on negotiations with the target business, although we will attempt to primarily use our equity as transaction

consideration. There is no limitation on our ability to raise funds privately or through loans in connection with our initial business

combination. We have not established any specific attributes or criteria (financial or otherwise) for prospective target businesses.

To the extent we effect our initial business

combination with a financially unstable company or an entity in its early stage of development or growth, including entities without

established records of sales or earnings, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in the business and operations of financially

unstable and early stage or potential emerging growth companies. Although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent

in a particular target business, we may not properly ascertain or assess all significant risk factors. In evaluating a prospective

target business, our management may consider a variety of factors, including one or more of the following:

● financial condition and results of operation;

● growth potential;

● brand recognition and potential;

● return on equity or invested capital;

● market capitalization or enterprise value;

● experience and skill of management and availability of additional personnel;

● capital requirements;

● competitive position;

● barriers to entry;

● stage of development of the products, processes or services;

● existing distribution and potential for expansion;

● impact of regulation on the business;

● regulatory environment of the industry;

● costs associated with effecting the business combination;

● macro competitive dynamics in the industry within which the company competes.

These criteria are not intended to be exhaustive.

Our management may not consider any of the above criteria in evaluating a prospective target business. The retention of our officers

and directors following the completion of any business combination will not be a material consideration in our evaluation of a

prospective target business.

Any evaluation relating to the merits of

a particular business combination will be based, to the extent relevant, on the above factors as well as other considerations deemed

relevant by our management in effecting a business combination consistent with our business objective. In evaluating a prospective

target business, we will conduct an extensive due diligence review which will encompass, among other things, meetings with incumbent

management and inspection of facilities, as well as review of financial and other information which is made available to us. This

due diligence review will be conducted either by our management or by unaffiliated third parties we may engage, although we have

no current intention to engage any such third parties.

The time and costs required to select and

evaluate a target business and to structure and complete our initial business combination remain to be determined. Any costs incurred

with respect to the identification and evaluation of a prospective target business with which a business combination is not ultimately

completed will result in a loss to us and reduce the amount of capital available to otherwise complete a business combination.

Fair Market Value of Target Business

Pursuant to Nasdaq listing rules, our initial

business combination must occur with one or more target businesses having an aggregate fair market value equal to at least 80%

of the value of the funds in the trust account (excluding any deferred underwriter’s fees and taxes payable on the income

earned on the trust account), which we refer to as the 80% test, at the time of the execution of a definitive agreement for our

initial business combination, although we may structure a business combination with one or more target businesses whose fair market

value significantly exceeds 80% of the trust account balance. While the fair market value of the target business must satisfy the

80% test, the consideration we pay the owners of the target business may be a combination of cash (whether cash from the trust

account or cash from a debt or equity financing transaction that closes concurrently with the business combination) or our equity

securities. The exact nature and amount of consideration would be determined based on negotiations with the target business,

although we will attempt to primarily use our equity as transaction consideration. If we are no longer listed on Nasdaq, we will

not be required to satisfy the 80% test.

We currently anticipate structuring a business

combination to acquire 100% of the equity interests or assets of the target business or businesses. We may, however, structure

a business combination where we merge directly with the target business or where we acquire less than 100% of such interests or

assets of the target business in order to meet certain objectives of the target management team or stockholders or for other reasons,

but we will only complete such business combination if the post-transaction company owns 50% or more of the outstanding voting

securities of the target or otherwise owns a controlling interest in the target sufficient for it not to be required to register

as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. Even if the post-transaction company owns 50% or more of the voting

securities of the target, our stockholders prior to the business combination may collectively own a minority interest in the post-transaction

company, depending on valuations ascribed to the target and us in the business combination transaction. For example, we could pursue

a transaction in which we issue a substantial number of new shares in exchange for all of the outstanding capital stock of a target.

In this case, we would acquire a 100% controlling interest in the target. However, as a result of the issuance of a substantial

number of new shares, our stockholders immediately prior to our initial business combination could own less than a majority of

our outstanding shares subsequent to our initial business combination. If less than 100% of the equity interests or assets of a

target business or businesses are owned or acquired by the post-transaction company, the portion of such business or businesses

that is owned or acquired is what will be valued for purposes of the 80% test. In order to consummate such an acquisition, we may

issue a significant amount of our debt or equity securities to the sellers of such businesses and/or seek to raise additional funds

through a private offering of debt or equity securities. We have not entered into any such fund raising arrangement and have no

current intention of doing so. The fair market value of the target will be determined by our board of directors based upon one

or more standards generally accepted by the financial community (such as actual and potential sales, earnings, cash flow and/or

book value). If our board is not able to independently determine that the target business has a sufficient fair market value, we

will obtain an opinion from an unaffiliated, independent investment banking firm, or another independent entity that commonly renders

valuation opinions on the type of target business we are seeking to acquire, with respect to the satisfaction of such criteria.

We will not be required to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm, or another independent entity that commonly

renders valuation opinions on the type of target business we are seeking to acquire, as to the fair market value if our board of

directors independently determines that the target business complies with the 80% threshold. However, if we seek to consummate

an initial business combination with an entity that is affiliated with any of our officers, directors or insiders and are therefore

required to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm that the business combination is fair to our unaffiliated

stockholders from a financial point of view, we may ask that banking firm to opine on whether the target business met the 80% fair

market value test. Nevertheless, we are not required to do so and could determine not to do so without consent of our stockholders.

Lack of Business Diversification

We expect to complete only a single business

combination, although this process may entail simultaneous business combinations with several operating businesses. Therefore,

at least initially, the prospects for our success may be entirely dependent upon the future performance of a single business operation.

Unlike other entities which may have the resources to complete several business combinations of entities operating in multiple

industries or multiple areas of a single industry, it is probable that we will not have the resources to diversify our operations

or benefit from the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses. By consummating our initial business combination with

only a single entity, our lack of diversification may:

If we determine to simultaneously consummate

our initial business combination with several businesses and such businesses are owned by different sellers, we will need for each

of such sellers to agree that our purchase of its business is contingent on the simultaneous closings of the other combinations,

which may make it more difficult for us, and delay our ability, to complete the business combination. With a business combination

with several businesses, we could also face additional risks, including additional burdens and costs with respect to possible multiple

negotiations and due diligence investigations and the additional risks associated with the subsequent assimilation of the operations

and services or products of the target companies in a single operating business.

Limited Ability to Evaluate the Target Business’ Management

Team

Although we intend to scrutinize the management

team of a prospective target business when evaluating the desirability of effecting our initial business combination, our assessment

of the target business’ management team may not prove to be correct. In addition, the future management team may not have

the necessary skills, qualifications or abilities to manage a public company. Furthermore, the future role of our officers and

directors, if any, in the target business following our initial business combination remains to be determined. While it is possible

that some of our key personnel will remain associated in senior management or advisory positions with us following our initial

business combination, it is unlikely that they will devote their full time efforts to our affairs subsequent to our initial business

combination. Moreover, they would only be able to remain with the company after the consummation of our initial business combination

if they are able to negotiate employment or consulting agreements in connection with the business combination. Such negotiations

would take place simultaneously with the negotiation of the business combination and could provide for them to receive compensation

in the form of cash payments and/or our securities for services they would render to the company after the consummation of the

business combination. While the personal and financial interests of our key personnel may influence their motivation in identifying

and selecting a target business, their ability to remain with the company after the consummation of our initial business combination

will not be the determining factor in our decision as to whether or not we will proceed with any potential business combination.

Additionally, our officers and directors may not have significant experience or knowledge relating to the operations of the particular

target business.

Following our initial business combination,

we may seek to recruit additional managers to supplement the incumbent management of the target business. We may not have the ability

to recruit additional managers, or that any such additional managers we do recruit will have the requisite skills, knowledge or

experience necessary to enhance the incumbent management.

Stockholder Approval of Business Combination

In connection with any proposed business

combination, we will either (1) seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination at a meeting called for such purpose

at which public stockholders (but not our insiders, officers or directors) may seek to convert their shares of common stock, regardless

of whether they vote for or against the proposed business combination, into a portion of the aggregate amount then on deposit in

the trust account, or (2) provide our stockholders with the opportunity to sell their shares to us by means of a tender offer (and

therefore avoid the need for a stockholder vote) for an amount equal to their pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on deposit

in the trust account, in each case subject to the limitations described herein. If we determine to engage in a tender offer, such

tender offer will be structured so that each stockholder may tender all of his, her or its shares rather than some pro rata portion

of his, her or its shares. The decision as to whether we will seek stockholder approval of a proposed business combination or whether

we will allow stockholders to sell their shares to us in a tender offer will be made by us, solely in our discretion, and will

be based on a variety of factors such as the timing of the transaction and whether the terms of the transaction would otherwise

require us to seek stockholder approval. We anticipate that our business combination could be completed by way of a merger, share

exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, recapitalization, reorganization or other similar transaction. Stockholder approval

will not be required under Delaware law if the business combination is structured as an acquisition of assets of the target company,

a share exchange with target company stockholders or a purchase of stock of the target company; however, Nasdaq rules would require

us to obtain stockholder approval if we seek to issue shares representing 20% or more of our outstanding shares as consideration

in a business combination. A merger of our company into a target company would require stockholder approval under Delaware law.

A merger of a target company into our company would not require stockholder approval unless the merger results in a change to our

amended and restated certificate of incorporation, or if the shares issued in connection with the merger exceed 20% of our outstanding

shares prior to the merger. A merger of a target company with a subsidiary of our company would not require stockholder approval

unless the merger results in a change in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation; however, Nasdaq rules would require

us to obtain stockholder approval of such a transaction if we week to issue shares representing 20% or more of our outstanding

shares as consideration.

If a stockholder vote is not required and

we do not decide to hold a stockholder vote for business or other legal reasons, we will provide our stockholders with an opportunity

to tender their shares to us pursuant to a tender offer pursuant to Rule 13e-4 and Regulation 14E of the Exchange Act, which regulate

issuer tender offers, and we will file tender offer documents with the SEC which will contain substantially the same financial

and other information about the initial business combination as is required under the SEC’s proxy rules.

In the event we allow stockholders to tender

their shares pursuant to the tender offer rules, our tender offer will remain open for at least 20 business days, in accordance

with Rule 14e-1(a) under the Exchange Act, and we will not be permitted to complete our initial business combination until the

expiration of the tender offer period. In addition, the tender offer will be conditioned on public stockholders not tendering more

than a specified number of public shares, which number will be based on the requirement that we may not purchase public shares

in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 (so that we are not subject to the SEC’s

“penny stock” rules) or any greater net tangible asset or cash requirement which may be contained in the agreement

relating to our initial business combination. If public stockholders tender more shares than we have offered to purchase, we will

withdraw the tender offer and not complete the initial business combination.

If, however, stockholder approval of the

transaction is required by law or Nasdaq requirements, or we decide to obtain stockholder approval for business or other legal

reasons, we will:

● file proxy materials with the SEC.

In the event that we seek stockholder approval

of our initial business combination, we will distribute proxy materials and, in connection therewith, provide stockholders with

the conversion rights described above upon completion of the initial business combination.

We will consummate our initial business

combination only if public stockholders do not exercise conversion rights in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets

to be less than $5,000,001 and a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock voted are voted in favor of the business combination.

We chose our net tangible asset threshold of $5,000,001 to ensure that we would avoid being subject to Rule 419 promulgated under

the Securities Act. However, if we seek to consummate an initial business combination with a target business that imposes any type

of working capital closing condition or requires us to have a minimum amount of funds available from the trust account upon consummation

of such initial business combination, our net tangible asset threshold may limit our ability to consummate such initial business

combination (as we may be required to have a lesser number of shares converted) and may force us to seek third party financing

which may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all. As a result, we may not be able to consummate such initial business

combination and we may not be able to locate another suitable target within the applicable time period, if at all. Public stockholders

may therefore have to wait until June 1, 2021 in order to be able to receive a portion of the trust account.

Our insiders, officers and directors have

agreed (1) to vote any shares of common stock owned by them in favor of any proposed business combination, (2) not to convert any

shares of common stock into the right to receive cash from the trust account in connection with a stockholder vote to approve a

proposed initial business combination or a vote to amend the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation

relating to stockholders’ rights or pre-business combination activity and (3) not sell any shares of common stock in any

tender in connection with a proposed initial business combination.

Depending on how a business combination is structured,

any stockholder approval requirement could be satisfied by obtaining the approval of either (i) a majority of the shares of our common

stock that were voted at the meeting (assuming a quorum was present at the meeting), or (ii) a majority of the outstanding shares of our

common stock. Because our insiders, officers and directors collectively beneficially own approximately 26.7% of our issued and outstanding

shares of common stock, no public shares (if the approval requirement was a majority of shares voted and the minimum number of shares

required for a quorum attended the meeting) would need to be voted in favor a business combination in order for it to be approved.

None of our insiders or their affiliates

has indicated any intention to purchase units or shares of common stock from persons in the open market or in private transactions.

However, if we seek stockholder approval of a business combination and if we hold a meeting to approve a proposed business combination

and a significant number of stockholders vote, or indicate an intention to vote, against such proposed business combination, we

or our insiders or their affiliates could make such purchases in the open market or in private transactions in order to influence

the vote. However, they have no current commitments, plans or intentions to engage in such transactions and have not formulated

any terms or conditions for any such transactions. No funds from the trust account can be released from the trust account prior

to the consummation of a business combination to make such purchases (although such purchases could be made using funds available

to us after the closing of a business combination). We do not currently anticipate that such purchases, if any, would constitute

a tender offer subject to the tender offer rules under the Exchange Act or a going-private transaction subject to the going-private

rules under the Exchange Act; however, if the purchasers determine at the time of any such purchases that the purchases are subject

to such rules, the purchasers will comply with such rules. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we or our insiders or their affiliates

will not make purchases of shares of common stock if the purchases would violate Sections 9(a)(2) or 10(b) of the Exchange Act

or Regulation M, which are rules that prohibit manipulation of a company’s stock, and we and they will comply with Rule 10b-18

under the Exchange Act in connection with any open-market purchases. If purchases cannot be made without violating applicable law,

Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain) · 10-K for the period ended 2020-12-31, filed 2021-03-30 · accession 0001213900-21-018775

Filing HTML rendered to line-structured narrative text by the shipped reducer (datafeeds.edgar_fulltext.visible_text, keep_table_headers=True): scripts and inline-XBRL headers are dropped, and table content is reduced to its short label cells — numeric table data is not rendered and is therefore not counted. The same rendering is used for every year, so a year-over-year comparison is like for like.

The text is our rendering of the filing, not a facsimile: original pagination, typography and tables are not reproduced, and the numbers live in the financial statements (FA).

The outline locates item HEADINGS in this document. Only Items 1A and 7 have certified boundaries elsewhere in the terminal (the redline and the narrative-overlap number); every span here runs from one heading found to the next heading found.

How the outline was chosen. It is the longest chain of item headings that runs forward through both the document and the standard item order: 20 headings are on that chain and 15 further heading-shaped lines are not — the table-of-contents echo of every item, cross-references and exhibit-list mentions. Each entry's length is measured from its heading to the next heading on the chain.