Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following discussion identifies the most significant factors that may materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. These and other factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, may cause future results of operations to differ materially from past results or those results currently expected or desired. The following information should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (included in Item 7 of this Form 10-K) and the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related notes (included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K).
Business and Operations Risks
Chemical manufacturing is inherently hazardous and may result in accidents or may require planned or unplanned production slowdowns or shutdowns, which may disrupt our operations or expose us to significant losses or liabilities that may have a material impact on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Manufacturing facilities in the Company’s industry are subject to planned and unplanned production slowdowns and shutdowns, turnarounds and outages. Unplanned production disruptions may occur for external reasons, such as natural disasters, weather, disease, pandemic, strikes, transportation interruption, government regulation, political unrest or terrorism, or internal reasons, such as fire, explosions, mechanical failure, labor-related work stoppages or slowdowns, maintenance, discharges, contamination, environmental remediation or other manufacturing problems. For example, in 2022, unplanned weather-related production disruptions at the Company’s Elwood, Illinois (Millsdale) facility impacted Polymer operations. In 2024, the operations of the Millsdale facility were negatively affected by a flood event. Certain of our production facilities are, and production facilities acquired or built in the future may be, located in areas where unplanned disruptions are more likely. Alternative facilities with sufficient capacity may not be available, may cost substantially more or may take a significant amount of time to increase production or qualify with Company customers, each of which could negatively impact the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Further, some of the Company’s products cannot currently be made, or made in the volume required, at more than one of the Company’s locations. For some of these products, the Company has access to external market suppliers, but the Company cannot guarantee that these products will be available to it in amounts sufficient to meet its requirements or at a cost that is competitive with the Company’s cost of manufacturing these products. Long-term production disruptions may cause Company customers to seek alternative supply, which could further adversely affect Company profitability.
The hazards associated with chemical manufacturing and the related storage and transportation of raw materials, products and wastes are inherent in our operations. We cannot eliminate the risk of accidental contamination, discharge or injury resulting from those materials. Also, our suppliers and customers may use and/or generate hazardous materials, and we may be required to indemnify our suppliers, customers or waste disposal contractors against damages and other liabilities arising out of the production, handling or storage of our products or raw materials or the disposal of related wastes. Potential risks include explosions and fires, chemical spills and other discharges or releases of toxic or hazardous substances or gases, and pipeline and storage tank leaks and ruptures. Those hazards may result in personal injury and loss of life, damage to property, damages to public health and contamination of the environment, which may result in a suspension of operations and the imposition of civil or criminal fines, penalties and other sanctions, cleanup costs, and claims by governmental entities or third parties. Furthermore, the Company is subject to present claims, and may be subject to future claims, with respect to workplace exposure, contractor exposure to toxic or hazardous substances on the Company’s premises as well as other persons located nearby, workers’ compensation and other matters.
We are dependent on the continued operation of our production facilities and the loss or shutdown of operations over an extended period could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The Company maintains property, business interruption, products liability and casualty insurance policies, as well as insurance policies covering other types of risks, including pollution legal liability insurance. However, some of these potential manufacturing hazards and risks may not be insurable. Moreover, even when such hazards and risks are insurable, the insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover all losses resulting from the occurrence of any of these events. Each of these insurance policies is subject to customary exclusions, deductibles and coverage limits, in accordance with industry standards and practices. As a result of market conditions, premiums and deductibles for certain insurance policies can increase substantially and, in some instances, certain insurance may become unavailable or available only with reduced amounts of coverage. There is also a risk, beyond the reasonable control of the Company, that an insurance carrier may not have the financial resources to cover an insurable loss. As a result, the occurrence of any of these events could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The volatility of raw material, natural gas and electricity costs, as well as any disruption in their supply, may result in increased costs and materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The costs of raw materials, natural gas and electricity represent a substantial portion of the Company’s operating costs. The principal raw materials used in the Company’s products are petroleum-based or plant-based. Natural gas is used in the Company’s
7
manufacturing sites primarily to generate steam for its manufacturing processes. The prices of many of these raw materials can be subject to periods of rapid and significant instability. These fluctuations in prices may be affected by supply and demand factors, such as general economic conditions, regulatory developments with respect to and restrictions on the transport of raw materials (some of which may be viewed as hazardous), currency exchange rates, political instability or terrorist attacks, all of which are beyond the Company’s control. For example, most recently in 2022, supply chain disruptions and inflationary pressures have led to increases in raw material prices for the Company, particularly during periods of heightened inflation such as the 2022 timeframe. The Company may not be able to pass increased raw material or energy costs on to customers through increases in product prices as a result of arrangements the Company has with certain customers and competitive pressures in the market. In addition, the Company’s suppliers are subject to planned and unplanned production slowdowns and shutdowns, turnarounds and outages. Unplanned production disruptions may occur for external reasons, such as natural disasters, weather, disease, strikes, transportation interruption, government regulation, political unrest or terrorism, or internal reasons, such as fire, explosions, mechanical failure, labor-related work stoppages or slowdowns, maintenance, discharges, contamination, environmental remediation or other manufacturing problems. Certain of our suppliers’ facilities are located in areas where unplanned disruptions are more likely. In the event of supply disruptions, raw materials may not be available to the Company in amounts sufficient to meet our requirements, and alternative raw materials may not be available, may cost substantially more or may take a significant amount of time for the Company to qualify. If the Company is unable to minimize the effects of increased raw material and energy costs or pass such increased costs on to customers, or manage any interruption to the supply of raw materials or energy, its business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows may be materially and adversely affected.
The Company relies heavily on third-party transportation to deliver raw materials to Company manufacturing facilities and ship products to Company customers. Disruptions in transportation or significant changes in transportation costs have affected and could continue to affect the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company relies heavily on railroads, ships, and other over-the-road shipping methods to transport raw materials to its manufacturing facilities and to ship finished products to customers. Transport operations are exposed to various risks, such as extreme weather conditions, natural disasters, technological problems, work stoppages, personnel shortages and operating hazards, as well as interstate and international transportation regulations. If the Company, its suppliers or third-party transportation operators experience transportation problems, or if there are significant changes in the cost of these services, the Company may not be able to arrange efficient alternatives and timely means to obtain raw materials or ship finished products, which could result in a material adverse effect on Company revenues, costs and operating results. For example, recent conflicts in the Middle East region have contributed to increased shipping costs and transportation times for certain raw materials and products.
Conflicts, military actions, terrorist attacks and general instability, particularly in certain energy-producing nations, along with increased security regulations related to our industry, could adversely affect the Company’s business.
Conflicts, military actions and terrorist attacks have precipitated economic instability, turmoil in financial markets and disruptions in the price and supply of raw materials and energy. The uncertainty and economic or operational disruptions resulting from hostilities, military action or acts of terrorism may impact the Company’s facilities and operations or those of its suppliers or customers. Accordingly, any conflict, military action or terrorist attack that impacts the Company or any of its suppliers or customers, or any resulting economic or operational instability resulting from such conflict, military action or terrorist attack, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows. For example, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 resulted in higher energy prices and concerns regarding the supply of natural gas to countries in Europe. Higher energy costs and reduced availability of natural gas in European countries could materially and adversely affect the operations and results of operations of the Company or its suppliers and customers.
Cost overruns, delays and miscalculations in capacity needs with respect to the Company’s expansion or other capital projects could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
From time to time, the Company initiates expansion and other significant capital projects. Projects of this type are subject to risks of delay or cost overruns inherent in any large construction project resulting from numerous factors, including the following: shortages of equipment, materials or skilled labor; work stoppages; unscheduled delays in the delivery of ordered materials and equipment; unanticipated cost increases; difficulties in obtaining necessary permits or in meeting permit conditions; difficulties in meeting regulatory requirements or obtaining regulatory approvals; availability of suppliers to certify equipment for existing and enhanced regulations; design and engineering problems; and failure or delay of third-party service providers, civil unrest and labor disputes. For example, in 2022 the Company disclosed that supply chain disruptions and labor shortages had delayed the expected startup of its Pasadena, Texas facility and that cost inflation had increased the expected cost of the project. Significant cost overruns or delays in completing a capital project could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s return on investment, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, if the Company misjudges its future capacity needs, this too could materially and adversely impact its business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
8
Market, Competition and Strategic Risks
Customer product reformulations or new technologies can reduce the demand for the Company’s existing products, and the Company may not be successful in developing or introducing new products.
The Company’s products are used in a broad range of customer product applications. Changes in customer manufacturing processes, customer product reformulations, development and use of new technologies or changes in regulatory, legislative or industry requirements may lead to reduced consumption of the Company’s products or cause customers to consider some Company products obsolete or less attractive.
For example, increased concerns regarding the safety of 1,4 dioxane in consumer products and its potential impact on human health and the environment may lessen the demand for certain of the Company’s products. 1,4 dioxane is generated as a by-product during the manufacture of certain of the Company’s surfactant products, including alkoxylates and ether sulfates, used by its customers as cleaning agents in household cleaning, personal care and cosmetics products. In their finished form, consumer products that contain ethoxylated surfactants may contain trace amounts of 1,4 dioxane. 1,4 dioxane has been categorized by regulators as a toxic and carcinogenic substance at certain levels. In December 2019, New York adopted a law that, beginning in 2022 and 2023, permitted no more than 2 ppm and 1 ppm, respectively, of 1,4 dioxane in cleaning and personal care products and 10 ppm in cosmetics products. California has published proposed regulations on cleaning and personal care products containing 1,4 dioxane; other U.S. states are also considering regulating 1,4 dioxane levels in consumer products. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) also continues to examine 1,4 dioxane as part of its environmental and occupational regulatory authority. Under TSCA, USEPA identified 1,4 dioxane as a high priority chemical and issued its final risk evaluation and risk determination, concluding that 1,4 dioxane poses an unreasonable risk of injury to human health. US EPA will now progress to the risk management phase, in which it is expected to implement risk management measures to mitigate any identified risks. The European Union is also expected to propose a regulatory limit for 1,4 dioxane content in surfactants. We expect our customers to continue reformulating their personal care, cosmetics and cleaning products to comply with New York’s regulations. These trends and corresponding changes in consumer preferences could reduce demand for our ethoxylated surfactant products, as our customers look to reduce the levels of ethoxylated surfactants in their finished products to stay below the maximum allowed levels or transition to alternative surfactants with lower levels of 1,4 dioxane. We have modified our manufacturing process to reduce 1,4 dioxane content to allow customers to continue to use ethoxylated surfactants at current use levels, while also offering consumer product formulations that contain low/no dioxane surfactants.
An essential component of the Company’s strategy is a focus on continuing to develop new products to replace the sales of products that mature and decline in use, though the Company may not be successful in achieving its growth expectations from developing new products. Moreover, the Company cannot be certain that the costs it incurs investing in new product and technology development will result in an increase in revenues or profits commensurate with its investment, and the introduction of any new products may be disrupted or delayed by manufacturing or other technical difficulties. The Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected if the Company is unable to successfully manage the maturation of existing products and the timely and successful development and introduction of new products.
To the extent the Company seeks acquisition opportunities, it may not be able to make acquisitions of suitable candidates or integrate acquisitions successfully.
In recent years, the Company’s business strategy has included acquisitions to expand into new markets and to enhance its position in its existing markets. To the extent it seeks to do so in the future it may not be able to successfully identify suitable candidates, negotiate appropriate acquisition terms, obtain financing needed to consummate those acquisitions, complete proposed acquisitions or successfully integrate acquired businesses into its existing operations. In addition, any acquisition, once successfully integrated, may not perform as planned, be accretive to earnings, or otherwise prove beneficial to the Company.
Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including the assumption of undisclosed or unindemnified liabilities, difficulties in the assimilation of the operations and the transfer of all necessary licenses and permits, technologies, services and products of the acquired companies and the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns. In addition, prior acquisitions have resulted, and future acquisitions could result, in the incurrence of substantial additional indebtedness and other expenses.
The Company faces significant global competition in each of its operating segments. If the Company cannot successfully compete in the marketplace, its business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows may be materially and adversely affected.
The Company faces significant competition from numerous global companies as well as national, regional and local companies in the markets it serves. Many of the Company’s competitors have access to greater financial resources, which may enable them to invest significant capital into their businesses, including expenditures for research and development. Some of the Company’s competitors have their own raw material resources and may be able to produce products more economically. In addition, some of the
9
Company’s customers have internal manufacturing capabilities that allow them to achieve make-versus-buy economics, which may result at times in the Company losing business with these customers in volumes that could adversely affect the Company’s profitability. For example, in 2022, the Company lost sales volume from one customer that invested in internal production capabilities for low-1,4 dioxane products.
To maximize profitability levels, the Company must, among other things, maintain the service levels, product quality and performance and competitive pricing necessary to retain existing customers and attract new customers as well as continue to develop and introduce new products. The Company’s inability to do so could place it at a competitive disadvantage relative to its competitors, and if the Company cannot successfully compete in the marketplace, its business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows may be materially and adversely affected.
We are affected by general economic conditions and downturns in certain industries, in some cases driven by consumer preferences, and general economic downturns may have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
General economic conditions and macroeconomic trends could adversely affect users of some end products that are manufactured using the Company’s products and the industries in which such end products are used. During economic downturns or other periods of uncertainty, these users may reduce their volume of purchases of such end products or may purchase alternative products, which would reduce demand for the Company’s products. For example, in 2021 and 2022, construction project delays and cancellations related to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and uncertain general economic conditions, including supply chain issues, reduced demand for the Company’s rigid polyol products. In addition, increasing concern among consumers, public health professionals and government agencies about environmental, health or wellness issues could lead some of the Company’s customers to limit the use of certain of our products or result in harm to the Company’s reputation. Reduced demand from the primary end markets for the Company’s products, such as the consumer products industry, could adversely affect the Company and demand for our products. Additionally, uncertain conditions in the financial markets pose a risk to the overall economy that may impact consumer demand for such end products and customer demand of some of the Company’s products, as well as the Company’s ability to manage normal commercial relationships with its customers, suppliers and creditors. Some of the Company’s customers may not be able to meet the terms of sale, which would result in increased credit risk and suppliers may not be able to fully perform their contractual obligations due to tighter credit markets or a general slowdown in economic activity.
In the event that economic conditions worsen or result in a prolonged downturn or recession, or consumer-driven preferences result in reduced demand for our products, the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows may be materially and adversely affected.
If the Company is unable to protect its intellectual property rights, the Company’s ability to compete may be negatively impacted.
The Company’s patents and other intellectual property may not prevent competitors from independently developing or selling similar or duplicative products and services, and there can be no assurance that the resources the Company invests to protect its intellectual property will be sufficient or that the Company’s intellectual property portfolio will adequately deter misappropriation or improper use of its technology. The Company could also face competition in some countries where it has not invested in an intellectual property portfolio, or where intellectual property rights are more difficult to obtain and/or assert. In addition, the Company may be the target of aggressive and opportunistic enforcement of patents by third parties, including non-practicing entities. Regardless of the merit of such claims, responding to infringement claims can be expensive and time-consuming. If the Company is found to infringe any third-party rights, it could be required to pay substantial damages or it could be enjoined from offering some of its products and services. Also, there can be no assurances that the Company will be able to obtain or renew from third parties the licenses it may need in the future on reasonable terms or at all. If the Company is unable to protect or maintain its intellectual property rights, the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows may be materially and adversely affected.
Regulatory and Legal Risks
The Company is subject to a variety of environmental, health and safety and product registration laws dealing with the production and sale of chemicals that could require us to incur additional costs or to reformulate or discontinue certain of our products, or expose us to liability or enforcement actions.
The Company’s operations are regulated under a number of federal, state, local and foreign environmental, health and safety laws and regulations that govern, among other things, the production and marketing of chemical substances and the discharge, use, handling, transport, storage and disposal of hazardous materials into the air, soil and water. In the United States, these laws and regulations include, but are not limited to, the U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the Occupational Safety and Health Act and state and local laws,
10
such as California’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Proposition 65). Analogous laws outside the United States apply to us in many jurisdictions, including, among others, the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemical Substances (REACH) regulations in the European Union and the United Kingdom and Biocidal Products Regulations in the European Union and the United Kingdom. Compliance with these environmental, health and safety laws and regulations is a major consideration for the Company, and to comply with some of these laws, we may need to alter our product lines or implement different or more costly manufacturing processes (including the installation of pollution control equipment), which could lead to a material adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition, the transportation of certain raw materials is highly regulated and is subject to increased regulation or restrictions. These regulations may restrict or prohibit transport of these raw materials, resulting in these raw materials not being available to the Company in quantities desired by the Company or at costs attractive to the Company, which may restrict or substantially limit the Company’s manufacturing operations.
The REACH regulations are registration systems that impose obligations on manufacturers and importers of chemicals and other products into the European Union and United Kingdom to compile and file reports and testing data on, and perform safety assessments for, certain chemical substances. Any new substances introduced to the EU or UK markets in the future must be registered. The costs associated with the Company’s compliance with these registrations have been substantial and are expected to increase as product sales increase because higher tonnage bands have higher annual registration fees and require more testing to support the registration. Moreover, if a registration in the future is not submitted by any applicable deadline, our ability to sell those products may be negatively impacted until the registration process has been completed. In addition, the European Chemical Agency is evaluating existing chemical registrations and may require additional testing and data collection. Chemicals may be assessed and removed from EU commerce entirely, potentially requiring the Company to discontinue certain product lines and to reformulate others, which could materially alter the Company’s marketplace position or otherwise have a material financial effect on its revenues and expenses. Regulators in other countries are also implementing chemical registration regulations similar to the REACH regulations.
Furthermore, some of the laws and regulations applicable to us have changed in recent years to impose new obligations or increasing compliance costs that could also force us to reformulate or discontinue certain of our products. For example, the European Union is now requiring a review of existing active biocide substances, and based on this review, the European Commission or an individual member state may decide not to authorize the product for continued sale. As another example, TSCA now mandates that the USEPA must designate “high priority” chemicals and perform a risk evaluation, which could result in a finding of “unreasonable risk” and a decision to promulgate new regulations to address such risk. As a result of such regulations, our ability to sell certain products may be curtailed and customers may avoid purchasing some products in favor of less regulated, less hazardous or less costly alternatives. The Company may offer alternative products, sales of which may or may not replace sales of such curtailed products. It may be impractical for us to continue manufacturing heavily regulated products, and we may incur costs to shut down or transition such operations to alternative products. In this regard, the nature, stringency and timing of any future regulations or changes in regulations are uncertain.
In addition, increasingly stringent regulation of human exposure to ethylene oxide by regulatory authorities in the United States could require material expenditures or changes in our manufacturing operations. The Company uses ethylene oxide at its Winder, Georgia and Elwood, Illinois (Millsdale) facilities and expects to use ethylene oxide at its Pasadena, Texas facility. The Company uses ethylene oxide in a closed loop process to manufacture surfactants that are used in products such as laundry detergents. The Company does not manufacture ethylene oxide, nor does it use ethylene oxide as a fumigant. Ethylene oxide is listed as a hazardous air pollutant under the Clean Air Act, as amended, emissions of which are regulated by the USEPA and other regulatory authorities. In 2020, Georgia adopted a law requiring any spill or release of ethylene oxide that occurs outside of normal operations to be reported to the state within 24 hours. In 2024, the USEPA issued a rule requiring that covered facilities conduct fenceline monitoring for ethylene oxide and install certain control and monitoring devices. Georgia and Illinois legislators have proposed legislation that would impose additional restrictions on the use of ethylene oxide. The USEPA is considering new standards for ethylene oxide emissions. While our production facilities have not yet been materially affected by changes in ethylene oxide regulation, any additional regulatory restrictions on the use or emission of ethylene oxide by facilities could impair our ability to manufacturer certain products in affected locations, including at our Winder, Georgia, Elwood, Illinois (Millsdale) and Pasadena, Texas facilities.
Compliance with environmental laws could restrict the Company’s ability to expand its facilities or require the Company to modify its facilities and processes or acquire additional costly pollution control equipment, incur other significant expenses, or expose the Company to greater liability associated with its production processes and products. The Company has incurred and will continue to incur capital expenditures and operating costs in complying with these laws and regulations, as our operations currently use, and have historically used, hazardous materials and generate, and have historically generated, quantities of hazardous waste. Some existing environmental laws and regulations impose liability and responsibility on present and former owners, operators or users of facilities and sites for contamination at those locations without regard to causation or knowledge of contamination. Certain of our sites have an extended history of industrial use, which may expose us to liability. We are subject to regulatory oversight and investigation, remediation, and monitoring obligations at certain current and former U.S. Superfund sites, as well as third-party disposal sites, under federal laws and their state and local analogues, including the RCRA, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, and CERCLA, as well as analogous foreign laws. See Item 3, Legal Proceedings, in this Form 10-K and Note 16, Contingencies, in the Notes to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements (included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K) for a summary of current significant environmental
11
proceedings related to certain sites. In the event that new contamination is discovered, including at facilities we may acquire in the future, the Company may become subject to additional obligations. The costs and liabilities associated with these issues may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company is also subject to numerous federal, state, local and foreign laws that regulate the manufacture, storage, distribution and labeling of many of the Company’s products, including some of the Company’s disinfecting, sanitizing and antimicrobial products. Some of these laws require the Company to have operating permits for the Company’s production facilities, warehouse facilities and operations. Various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations also require the Company to register the Company’s products and to comply with specified requirements with respect to those products, such as FIFRA, the EU Biocidal Products Regulation and Mexico’s General Law of Ecological Equilibrium and Environmental Protection. Additionally, those requirements, and enforcement of those requirements, may become more stringent in the future. The ultimate cost of compliance with any such requirements could be material.
Although it is our policy to comply with such laws and regulations, it is possible that we have not been or may not be at all times in material compliance with all of those requirements. If the Company has failed to comply or fails to comply in the future with any of these laws and regulations, including permitting and licensing requirements, it may be liable for damages and the costs of remedial actions in excess of the Company’s recorded liabilities, and may also be subject to fines, injunctions or criminal sanctions or to revocation, non-renewal or modification of the Company’s operating permits and revocation of the Company’s product registrations. Any such revocation, modification or non-renewal may require the Company to cease or limit the manufacture and sale of its products at one or more of the Company’s facilities, which may limit or prevent the Company’s ability to meet product demand or build new facilities and may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Any such revocation, non-renewal or modification may also result in an event of default under the indenture for the Company’s notes or under the Company’s credit facilities, which, if not cured or waived, may result in the acceleration of all or a portion of the Company’s indebtedness.
In addition to the costs of complying with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, the Company has incurred, and may incur in the future, costs defending against environmental litigation and/or investigations brought by government agencies and private parties, including administrative proceedings. The Company is, and may be in the future, a defendant in lawsuits brought by parties alleging environmental damage, personal injury or property damage. A significant judgment or settlement against the Company, to the extent not covered by existing insurance policies, could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Although the Company has insurance policies that may cover some of these potential losses, there is always uncertainty as to whether such insurance may be sufficient to cover such losses or available at all to the Company based on case-specific factors and the specific provisions of the Company’s insurance policies.
The potential cost to the Company relating to environmental, health and safety and product registration matters is uncertain due to factors such as the complexity and evolving nature of laws and regulations relating to the environment, health and safety and product registration, including those outside of the United States. Environmental, health and safety and product registration laws and regulations may also become more stringent over time, imposing greater compliance costs and increasing risks and penalties associated with any violation, as well as restricting or prohibiting the sale of existing or new products, which may also negatively impact the Company’s operating results. Without limiting the foregoing, these laws or regulations may also restrict or prohibit the use of non-renewable or carbon-based substances, or impose fees or penalties for the use of these substances. Accordingly, the Company may become subject to additional liabilities and increased operating costs in the future under these laws and regulations. The impact of any such changes, which are unknown at this time, may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Various liability claims could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company may be required to pay for losses or injuries purportedly caused by its products. The Company faces an inherent exposure to various types of claims including general liability, product liability, product recall, toxic tort and environmental, among others, if its products, or the end products that are manufactured with the Company’s products, result in property damage, injury or death. In addition, because the Company conducts business in multiple jurisdictions, the Company also faces an inherent exposure to other general claims based on its operations in those jurisdictions and the laws of those jurisdictions, including but not limited to claims arising from its relationship with employees, distributors, agents, customers and other parties with whom it has a business relationship, directly or indirectly. Many of these claims may be made against the Company even if there is no evidence of a loss from that claim, and these claims may be made by individual persons, groups of persons, or groups of plaintiffs in a class action. Defending these claims could result in significant legal expenses relating to defense costs and/or damage awards and diversion of management’s time and the Company’s resources. Any claim brought against the Company could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
12
The Company’s failure to comply with the anti-corruption laws of the United States and various international jurisdictions could negatively impact its reputation and results of operations.
Doing business on a worldwide basis requires the Company to comply with anti-corruption laws and regulations imposed by governments around the world with jurisdiction over our operations, which may include the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and the U.K. Bribery Act 2010 (the Bribery Act), as well as the laws of the other countries where the Company does business. These laws and regulations can apply to companies and individual directors, officers, employees and agents, and may restrict the Company’s operations, trade practices, investment decisions and partnering activities. Where they apply, the FCPA, the Bribery Act and similar laws prohibit, among other things, the Company and its officers, directors, employees and business partners, including joint venture partners and agents acting on the Company’s behalf, from corruptly offering, promising, authorizing or providing anything of value to “foreign officials” for the purposes of influencing official decisions or obtaining or retaining business or otherwise obtaining favorable treatment. The Bribery Act also prohibits non-governmental “commercial” bribery and accepting bribes. Part of the Company’s business may involve dealings with governments and state-owned business enterprises, the employees and representatives of which may be considered “foreign officials” for purposes of the FCPA and the Bribery Act. The Company is also subject to the jurisdiction of various governments and regulatory agencies around the world, which may bring Company personnel and agents into contact with “foreign officials” responsible for issuing or renewing permits, licenses, or approvals or for enforcing other governmental regulations. The Company’s global operations, including in countries with high levels of perceived corruption, expose it to the risk of violating, or being accused of violating, anti-corruption laws. Any failure on the part of the Company to successfully comply with these laws and regulations may expose the Company to reputational harm as well as significant sanctions, including criminal fines, imprisonment of its employees or representatives, civil penalties, disgorgement of profits, injunctions and debarment from government contracts, as well as other remedial measures. Investigations of alleged violations can be expensive and disruptive. Compliance with these laws can increase the cost of doing business globally. The Company maintains policies and procedures designed to assist the Company and its subsidiaries in complying with applicable anti-corruption laws. However, there can be no guarantee that these policies and procedures will effectively prevent violations by Company employees or representatives for which the Company may be held responsible, and any such violation could materially and adversely affect the Company’s reputation, as well as its business, financial position and results of operations and cash flows.
International Operations Risks
The Company’s results of operations may be adversely affected by international business risks, including fluctuations in currency exchange rates, legal restrictions and taxes.
The Company has substantial operations outside the United States. In the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company’s sales outside of the United States constituted approximately 45 percent of the Company’s net sales. In addition to the risks described in this Annual Report on Form 10‐K that are common to both the Company’s U.S. and non-U.S. operations, the Company faces, and will continue to face, risks related to the Company’s foreign operations, including:
•
trade and currency restrictions, including tariffs and currency exchange controls imposed by the United States and foreign countries;
•
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, which may affect product demand and may adversely affect the profitability in U.S. dollars of products and services the Company provides in international markets where payment for the Company’s products and services is made in the local currency;
•
political, economic, financial and market conditions, which may be unstable;
•
variability of intellectual property laws outside the United States, which may impact enforceability and consistency of protection of intellectual property assets;
•
high levels of inflation;
•
changes in labor conditions and difficulties in staffing and managing international operations;
•
corruption by government officials or other third parties or other adverse government actions;
•
differing economic cycles and adverse economic conditions;
•
changes in foreign laws and tax rates or U.S. laws and tax rates with respect to foreign income, which may unexpectedly increase the rate at which the Company’s income is taxed, impose new and additional taxes on remittances, repatriation or other payments by the Company’s subsidiaries, or cause the loss of previously recorded tax benefits;
•
greater difficulty enforcing contracts and collecting accounts receivable;
13
•
enforceability and compliance with U.S. and foreign laws affecting operations outside of the United States, including the FCPA (and foreign equivalents), export controls and regulations administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control; and
•
evolving laws and regulations over chemicals and chemical production and transportation that could limit the Company’s ability to sell products in certain markets (for example, the EU REACH regulation) and changing laws related to or the modification or non-renewal of operating permits and licenses that could result in material costs relating to regulatory compliance, liabilities, litigation proceedings, or other impacts, such as restrictions or prohibitions on our products.
The impacts of any or all of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The international scope of the Company’s operations and corporate structure may expose the Company to potentially adverse tax consequences.
The Company is subject to taxation in and to the tax laws and regulations of multiple jurisdictions as a result of the international scope of its operations and corporate structure. The Company is also subject to intercompany pricing laws, including those relating to the flow of funds between its entities pursuant to, for example, purchase agreements, licensing agreements or other arrangements. Adverse developments in these laws or regulations, or any change in position regarding the application, administration or interpretation of these laws or regulations in any applicable jurisdiction could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, the tax authorities in any applicable jurisdiction may disagree with the positions the Company has taken or intends to take regarding the tax treatment or characterization of any of the Company’s transactions, including the tax treatment or characterization of the Company’s indebtedness. The Company may also make certain tax elections, such as bonus depreciation, that could prevent the Company from fully benefiting from tax deductions such as the global intangible low-taxed income deduction or utilizing tax credits such as foreign tax credits. If any applicable tax authorities were to successfully challenge the tax treatment or characterization of any of the Company’s transactions, or the Company makes tax elections that impact other tax benefits, the potential resulting disallowance of deductions, imposition of withholding taxes on internal deemed transfers or other consequences could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could affect Company financial results.
The Company is also exposed to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. The Company’s results of operations are reported in U.S. dollars. However, outside the United Sates, the Company’s sales and costs are denominated in a variety of currencies including the European euro, British pound, Canadian dollar, Mexican peso, Colombian peso, Philippine peso, Brazilian real, Polish zloty, and Chinese RMB. The Company translates its local currency financial results into U.S. dollars based on average exchange rates prevailing during the reporting period or the exchange rate at the end of that period. During times of a strengthening U.S. dollar, the Company’s reported international sales and earnings may be reduced because the local currency may translate into fewer U.S. dollars. Fluctuations in exchange rates may materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In all jurisdictions in which the Company operates, the Company is also subject to laws and regulations that govern foreign investment, foreign trade and currency exchange transactions. These laws and regulations may limit the Company’s ability to repatriate cash as dividends or otherwise to the United States or to efficiently allocate cash to support strategic initiatives, and may limit the Company’s ability to convert foreign currency cash flows into U.S. dollars. A weakening of the currencies in which the Company generates sales relative to the foreign currencies in which the Company’s costs are denominated may lower the Company’s operating profits and cash flows.
Financial Risks
The Company could be adversely affected by downgrades to its credit ratings or disruptions in its ability to access well-functioning credit markets.
Historically, the Company has relied on the debt capital markets to fund portions of its capital investments and other corporate initiatives, as well as access to bank credit facilities as part of its overall financing strategy, including working capital management strategy. The Company’s continued access to these markets, and the terms of such access, depend on multiple factors including the condition of debt capital markets, the Company’s operating performance, and its credit ratings. These ratings are based on a number of factors, which include rating agencies’ assessment of the Company’s financial strength and outlook. There can be no assurance that any particular rating assigned to the Company will remain in effect for any given period of time or that a rating will not be changed or withdrawn by a rating agency, if in that rating agency’s judgment, future circumstances relating to the basis of the rating so warrant. Incurrence of additional debt by the Company could adversely affect its credit ratings. The Company depends on banks and other financial institutions to provide credit to its business and perform under the Company’s agreements with them. Defaults by one or more
14
of these counterparties on their obligations to the Company could materially and adversely affect it. Any downgrade of the Company’s credit ratings could materially and adversely affect its cost of funds, liquidity, competitive position and access to credit markets and increase the cost of and counterparty risks associated with existing facilities, which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company has a significant amount of indebtedness and may incur additional indebtedness, or need to refinance existing indebtedness, in the future, which may adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company has a significant amount of indebtedness and may incur additional indebtedness in the future. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had $311.7 million of debt on its balance sheet consisting of senior unsecured notes with maturities ranging from 2025 through 2032. In addition, the Company is party to a credit agreement providing for a $350.0 million revolving credit facility and a $100.0 million delayed-draw term loan credit facility; as of December 31, 2024, the Company had $313.7 million outstanding borrowings and $4.2 million outstanding letters of credit under the credit agreement with $122.1 million remaining available for future borrowings.
Certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries periodically maintain bank term loans and short-term bank lines of credit in their respective countries to meet working capital requirements as well as to fund capital expenditure programs and acquisitions. As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s foreign subsidiaries had no outstanding debt.
The Company’s current indebtedness and any additional indebtedness incurred in the future may materially and adversely affect its business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. For example, such indebtedness could:
•
require the Company to dedicate a substantial portion of cash flow from operations to pay principal and interest on the Company’s debt, which would reduce funds available to fund future working capital, capital expenditures and other general operating requirements;
•
limit the Company’s ability to borrow funds that may be needed to operate and expand its business;
•
limit the Company’s flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in the Company’s business and the industries in which the Company operates;
•
increase the Company’s vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions or a downturn in the Company’s business; and
•
place the Company at a competitive disadvantage compared to its competitors that have less debt.
The Company’s debt agreements contain customary covenants and other provisions that, among other things, require maintenance of certain financial ratios and place limitations on additional debt, investments and payment of dividends. The Company’s ability to comply with these provisions may be affected by events beyond our control. Failure to comply with these provisions could require repayment of outstanding debt or lead to a debt restructuring that could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, an increase in interest rates could limit the Company’s ability to incur additional debt to fund the Company’s strategic plans or to refinance maturing debt without incurring significant additional costs and could make borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility or other floating rate debt materially more expensive. Further, any future disruptions in the credit and financial markets may reduce the availability of debt financing or refinancing alternatives and increase the costs associated with such financing activities. If the Company is unable to secure financing when needed on satisfactory terms, or at all, its business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows may be materially and adversely affected.
General Risks
Interruption of, damage to or compromise of the Company’s information technology (IT) systems, failure to maintain the integrity of customer, colleague or Company data or illegal or fraudulent activities committed against the Company could harm the Company’s reputation and have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company relies on IT systems in its operations, including production, supply chain, research and development, finance, human resource and regulatory functions. The Company’s ability to effectively manage its business depends on the security, reliability and adequacy of these systems. IT system failures due to events including but not limited to network disruptions, programming errors, computer viruses and security breaches (e.g., cyber-attacks) could impact production activities, impede shipment of products, cause
15
delays or cancellations of customer orders, or hamper the processing of transactions or reporting of financial results. These or similar occurrences, whether accidental or intentional, could result in theft, unauthorized use or publication of our intellectual property or confidential business information of our employees, customers, suppliers or other third parties, which could harm our reputation and competitive position, reduce the value of our investments in research and development and other strategic initiatives, result in a loss of business, as well as remedial and other costs, fines, investigations, enforcement actions or lawsuits or otherwise materially and adversely affect our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
During the normal course of business, we have experienced and expect to continue to experience attempts to compromise our information and communications technology and related systems. Despite the security measures the Company has in place, the Company’s customers’ and suppliers’ information and operational technology systems could be vulnerable to cyber-threats such as computer viruses or other malicious codes, security breaches, unauthorized access, phishing attacks and other disruptions from system failures, including network outages, unintentional or malicious actions of employees or contractors or cyber-attacks by hackers, criminal groups, nation-states and nation-state-sponsored organizations. We anticipate that the risk of cybersecurity attacks will increase as artificial intelligence is increasingly used to identify vulnerabilities and conduct increasingly sophisticated attacks. In addition, if a material, actual or perceived breach of our security occurs, the public perception of the effectiveness of our security measures could be harmed and we could lose customers or suppliers. Any such material disruptions or breaches of security could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The defensive measures and training that the Company takes to limit and manage threats, especially cyber-related and social engineering threats, to our business may not adequately anticipate, prevent or mitigate harm we may suffer from such threats. Criminals use evolving and increasingly sophisticated methods of perpetrating illegal and fraudulent activities. For example, as previously disclosed, the Company determined in July 2024 that one of its subsidiaries in Asia was the victim of criminal social engineering scheme that resulted in a series of fraudulently-induced outbound payments for which the Company recognized pre-tax charges of $3.5 million and $3.3 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2024, and September 30, 2024, respectively. See Note 24, Other Matter, of the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements (included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K) for additional details regarding the criminal social engineering scheme. Fraudulent activities committed against the Company could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company continues to develop and enhance controls and security measures designed to protect against the risk of theft, loss or fraudulent or unlawful use of customer, supplier, third party, employee or Company data, or illegal or fraudulent activities committed against the Company and it maintains an ongoing process to re-evaluate the adequacy of its controls and measures. The Company may also be required to expend additional resources to continue to enhance its information privacy and security measures and/or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities. The Company maintains what it believes to be adequate and collectible insurance in the event of the theft, loss, fraudulent or unlawful use of customer, supplier, third party, employee or Company data, but any such occurrences could result in costs that may not be covered or may be in excess of any available insurance that the Company may have procured. While the Company has a comprehensive program in place for continuously reviewing, maintaining, testing and upgrading its IT systems and security, there can be no assurance that such efforts will prevent breakdowns of or breaches in Company IT systems or illegal or fraudulent activities committed against the Company that could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company’s success depends on its executive management and other key personnel.
The Company’s future success depends to a significant degree on the skills, experience and efforts of its executive management and other key personnel and their ability to provide the Company with uninterrupted leadership and direction. The availability of highly qualified talent is limited and the competition for talent is robust; as a result, the Company may not be able to recruit and retain the personnel it needs if it were to lose an existing member of executive management or other key personnel. The Company’s future success will depend on its ability to have adequate succession plans in place and to attract, retain and develop qualified personnel. A failure to efficiently replace members of executive management and other key personnel and to attract, retain and develop new qualified personnel could have a material and adverse effect on the Company’s business financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None
16
Item 1C. Cybersecurity
Cybersecurity Risk Management
We assess, identify and manage material risks from cybersecurity threats through various policies, procedures and processes, including through our Enterprise Risk Management program (ERM), our information security policies and standards, workforce cybersecurity trainings and third-party assessments and programs.
The Company uses ERM principles to help identify, prevent, and mitigate potential risks, including cybersecurity and related risks. We base our ERM program on the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) framework. Individuals representing Stepan’s global locations and functions contribute to our risk assessments at least annually through surveys and in-person interviews. Members are polled quarterly to spot emerging risks and trends. The Company’s Vice President, Chief Compliance and Risk Officer leads the ERM program and reports regularly to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors on ERM matters.
The Company maintains cybersecurity programs according to the set of guidelines developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology through the Cybersecurity Framework. The Company maintains a set of IT Security Standards that provides a framework of layered security protection. In addition, the Company maintains and communicates to its workforce a Use of Information Technology Policy to support the understanding of and commitment to safely using IT assets. This knowledge can help prevent accidental or intentional misuse of Company IT resources, which can compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of sensitive data and systems. The Company requires cybersecurity training to raise awareness and educate employees about cybersecurity risks. The Company updates its training program at least annually.
The Company engages a variety of IT assessors to evaluate and test the Company’s cybersecurity and cybersecurity controls. Additionally, the Company engages IT consultants to provide tabletop exercises, ransomware simulations, cyber policy and standards development, cybersecurity, data security, and IT training events, cybersecurity and data security testing and monitoring, and cybersecurity implementation projects.
Although the Company has put in place the cybersecurity policies, procedures and processes described above, the Company remains exposed to cybersecurity attacks and incidents and misuse or manipulation of any of its IT systems, which could have a material adverse effect on its business strategy, results of operations or financial condition. As of the filing of this Form 10-K, we are not aware of any attacks, incidents, misuse or manipulation that have occurred since the beginning of 2024 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, us, including our business strategy, results of operations or financial condition. For risks associated with cybersecurity threats, see the risk factor “Interruption of, damage to or compromise of the Company’s information technology (IT) systems, failure to maintain the integrity of customer, colleague or Company data or illegal or fraudulent activities committed against the Company could harm the Company’s reputation and have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.” included in “Part I—Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Cybersecurity Governance
The Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the Audit Committee) oversees the Company’s cybersecurity risk management.The Audit Committee receives quarterly reports on cybersecurity risks and risk management from the Company’s Chief Information Officer.The Company’s Chief Information Officer, who reports to the President and Chief Executive Officer, is in charge of assessing and managing our risks related to cybersecurity and oversees a team of full-time cybersecurity specialist employees.Utilizing the processes noted above, this team remains informed about and monitors the prevention, detection, mitigation and remediation of cybersecurity incidents.The Company’s Chief Information Officer has served in a variety of IT and cybersecurity roles for more than twenty-five years, including serving in IT infrastructure, cybersecurity, enterprise application, and project management office leadership roles for both public and privately held companies in the chemical, pharmaceutical, and manufacturing industries. He has earned the IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) Service Master Certification. The Company’s Cybersecurity Senior Manager, who reports to the Chief Information Officer, has earned multiple cybersecurity industry certifications and has over fifteen years of IT and cybersecurity experience. The Company’s cybersecurity program and cybersecurity practices are reviewed by internal and external auditors. The Company’s cybersecurity team provides periodic reports to such auditors.
17
Item 2. Properties
The following are the Company’s principal physical properties. Unless otherwise noted, the listed properties are owned by the Company. Management believes that the Company’s facilities are suitable and adequate for the Company’s current operations.
Name of Facility Location Site Size Segment
1. Millsdale Elwood, Illinois 492 acres Surfactants/Polymers
2. Winder Winder, Georgia 202 acres Surfactants
3. Maywood Maywood, New Jersey 19 acres Surfactants /Specialty Products
4. Pasadena Pasadena, Texas 51 acres Surfactants
5. Stepan France Voreppe, France 20 acres Surfactants
6. Stepan Ecatepec Ecatepec, Mexico 34 acres Surfactants
8. Stepan Brazil Vespasiano, Minas Gerais, Brazil 27 acres Surfactants
9. Global Technology Center Northfield, Illinois 8 acres N/A
10. Company Headquarters Northbrook, Illinois 1.72 acres (leased) N/A
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
There are a variety of legal proceedings pending or threatened against the Company that occur in the normal course of the Company’s business, the majority of which relate to environmental assessment, protection and remediation matters. Some of these proceedings may result in fines, penalties, judgments or costs being assessed against the Company at some future time. The Company’s operations are subject to extensive local, state and federal regulations, including the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and the Superfund amendments of 1986 (Superfund) as well as comparable regulations applicable to the Company’s foreign locations. Over the years, the Company has received requests for information related to or has been named by government authorities as a potentially responsible party at a number of sites where cleanup costs have been or may be incurred by the Company under CERCLA and similar state statutes. In addition, the Company is from time to time involved in routine legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of its business, including personal injury, property damage, tax, trade and labor matters. The Company believes that it has made adequate provisions for the costs it is likely to incur with respect to these claims. The Company’s material legal proceedings are described below:
Maywood, New Jersey Site
The Company’s property in Maywood, New Jersey, property formerly owned by the Company adjacent to its current site and other nearby properties (collectively, the Maywood site) were listed on the National Priorities List in September 1993 pursuant to the provisions of CERCLA because of alleged chemical and radiological contamination. Pursuant to (i) a September 21, 1987 Administrative Order on Consent entered into between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the Company for property formerly owned by the Company at the Maywood site and (ii) the issuance of an order on May 2, 1991, by the USEPA to the Company for property currently owned by the Company at the Maywood site, the Company has completed various Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Studies of soil and groundwater at the Maywood site. On September 24, 2014, the USEPA issued its Record of Decision (ROD) for chemically-contaminated soil at the Maywood site. The ROD was amended pursuant to an Explanation of Significant Differences in January 2021. On February 29, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey entered a consent decree among the Company, the United States, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) and the New Jersey Spill Compensation Fund Administrator that requires the Company to take certain actions and to pay certain past costs of the United States and NJDEP. The USEPA has not yet issued a ROD for chemically-contaminated groundwater at the Maywood site. Based on the most current information available, the Company believes its recorded liability is reasonable having considered the range of estimated costs of remediation for the Maywood site. The estimate of the cost of remediation for the Maywood site could change again as the Company continues to hold discussions with the USEPA, as the design of the remedial action is finalized, if a groundwater ROD is issued or if other potentially responsible parties are identified. The ultimate amount for which the Company is liable could differ materially from the Company’s current recorded liability.
18
D’Imperio Property Site
During the mid-1970’s, Jerome Lightman and the Lightman Drum Company disposed of hazardous substances generated by the Company at several sites in New Jersey, including the D’Imperio Property Superfund Site (the D’Imperio site). The Company was named as a potentially responsible party in an October 2, 1998 lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey that involved the D’Imperio site. The Company is cooperating with other potentially responsible parties to implement the selected remedy. Based on current information, the Company believes that its recorded liability is reasonable having considered the range of estimated cost of remediation for the D’Imperio site. Depending on the ultimate cost of the remediation at this site, the amount for which the Company is liable could differ materially from the Company’s current recorded liability.
Wilmington Site
Property formerly owned and operated by the Company in Wilmington, Massachusetts was listed on the National Priorities List in 2006. The Company, together with the current site owner and another potentially responsible party, entered into an Administrative Order on Consent in July 2007 to undertake a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study. A ROD was issued by USEPA on March 30, 2021. The Company and three other potentially responsible parties entered into a consent decree, dated September 28, 2023, with USEPA and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts that requires the remedial design and remedial action of the remedy selected in the ROD for two operable units and an interim remedy for another operable unit. Remediation at this site is being managed by its current owner, to whom the Company sold the property in 1980. The Company is contractually obligated to contribute up to five percent of the environmental response costs incurred by the current owner with no limitation on the ultimate amount of contributions. The Company had paid the current owner $4.0 million for the Company’s portion of environmental response costs at the Wilmington site through December 31, 2024. The Company has recorded a liability for its portion of the estimated remediation costs for the site. Depending on the ultimate cost of the remediation at this site, the amount for which the Company is liable could differ materially from the current recorded liability. On July 29, 2022, the Company and other potentially responsible parties were notified of a possible joint claim by federal and state trustees for alleged natural resource damages related to the Wilmington site. The alleged damages may result in penalties and the Company believes it may have exposure for this claim; however, at this stage, the Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of this claim, the allocation of costs among potentially responsible parties or what impact, if any, the outcome might have on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Based on current information, the Company believes that its recorded liability is reasonable; however, depending on the ultimate resolution of this matter, the amount for which the Company is liable could differ materially from the current recorded liability.
Millsdale Site
On March 26, 2024, the Company received a Notice and Finding of Violation from the USEPA alleging violations of air regulations at the Company’s Elwood, Illinois (Millsdale) facility. The notice alleges violations related to operating parameters and air emission requirements. The notice does not state whether the USEPA intends to pursue financial penalties or operational remedies. The alleged violations may result in a range of possible penalties; however, at this stage of the matter, the Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome or what impact, if any, the outcome might have on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Other U.S. Sites
Through the regular environmental monitoring of its plant production sites, the Company discovered levels of chemical contamination that were above thresholds allowed by law at its Elwood, Illinois (Millsdale) and Fieldsboro, New Jersey plants. The Company voluntarily reported its results to the applicable state environmental agencies. As a result, the Company is required to perform self-remediation of the affected areas. Based on current information, the Company believes that its recorded liability for the remediation of the affected areas is appropriate based on an estimate of expected costs. However, actual costs could differ materially from the current recorded liability.
Brazil Tax Rescission Action
In March 2017, the Brazil Supreme Court ruled that ICMS (State VAT) does not represent a Company’s revenue and should not be included in the calculation basis of certain indirect taxes (PIS/COFINS). Based on the Supreme Court’s decision, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary filed a lawsuit on March 23, 2017 to recover PIS/COFINS overpayments. The Company’s recovery case was successful and became final in November 2018. In May 2021, the Brazil Supreme Court modulated its original decision so that only taxpayers that had filed lawsuits before March 15, 2017, should recover prior PIS/COFINS overpayments. On June 12, 2023, the Brazil National Treasury filed a rescission action against the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary to rescind its use of the PIS/COFINS tax credits for the period from March 23, 2012, to March 15, 2017. In September and October 2024, the Brazil Superior Court and Supreme Court, respectively, ruled that the generally held two-year “res judicata” principle would start from the May 2021 ruling and not the final ruling
19
in prior taxpayer cases (e.g., November 30, 2018, for the Company’s case). Based on current information, the Company believes that its recorded liability is reasonable; however, depending on the ultimate resolution of this matter, the amount for which the Company is liable could differ materially from the current recorded liability.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not Applicable.
20
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(a)
The Company’s common stock is listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol SCL.
As of January 31, 2025, there were 1,912 holders of record of the Company’s common stock. This number does not include beneficial owners whose shares are held by banks, brokers and other institutions holding shares of the Company’s common stock on behalf of their customers.
(b)
Below is a summary by month of shares purchases by the Company during the fourth quarter of 2024:
(1)
On October 20, 2021, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the Company to repurchase up to $150,000,000 of its outstanding common stock. Under this program, which does not have an expiration date, repurchases may be made from time to time through open market transactions, privately negotiated transactions or a combination of the foregoing, subject to applicable laws.
(2)
Consists of 75 shares of Company common stock tendered by employees to settle statutory withholding taxes related to the distribution of restricted stock units.
(3)
Consists of 87 shares and 63 shares of Company common stock tendered by employees to settle statutory withholding taxes related to the exercise of SARs and the distribution of restricted stock units, respectively.
(4)
Consists of 400 shares and 1,082 shares of Company common stock tendered by employees to settle statutory withholding taxes related to the exercise of SARs and the distribution of restricted stock units, respectively.
21
(c)
Stock Performance Graph
The following stock performance graph compares the yearly change since December 31, 2019, in cumulative return on the common stock of the Company on a dividend reinvested basis to the Dow Jones Chemical Industry Index and the Russell 2000 Index. The Dow Jones Chemical Industry Index is a market-capitalization weighted grouping of 35 chemical companies, including major manufacturers of both basic and specialty products. The Company is not included in the Dow Jones Chemical Industry Index. The Russell 2000 Index is a market-capitalization weighted grouping of 2,000 small to medium sized companies in a broad range of industries. The Company has been included in the Russell 2000 Index since 1992. The graph assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2019 and shows the cumulative total return as of each December 31 thereafter.
Item 6. (Removed and Reserved)
22
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following is management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) of certain significant factors that have affected the Company’s financial condition and results of operations during the annual periods included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Presentation of Information
The discussion that follows includes a comparison of the Company’s results of operations and liquidity and capital resources for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and 2024. For a discussion of changes from the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 (filed February 29, 2024).
Overview
The Company produces and sells intermediate chemicals that are used in a wide variety of applications worldwide. The overall business is comprised of three reportable segments:
Surfactants - Surfactants, which accounted for 70 percent of the Company’s consolidated net sales in 2024, are principal ingredients in consumer and industrial cleaning and disinfection products such as detergents for washing clothes, dishes, carpets, floors and walls, as well as shampoos and body washes. Other applications include fabric softeners, germicidal quaternary compounds, disinfectants, lubricating ingredients, emulsifiers for spreading agricultural products and industrial applications such as latex systems, plastics and composites. Surfactants are manufactured at five sites in the United States, two European sites (United Kingdom and France), five Latin American sites (one site in Colombia and two sites in each of Brazil and Mexico) and two Asian sites (Philippines and Singapore).
Polymers - Polymers, which accounted for 27 percent of consolidated net sales in 2024, include polyurethane polyols, polyester resins and phthalic anhydride. Polyurethane polyols are used in the manufacture of rigid foam for thermal insulation in the construction industry and are also a base raw material for coatings, adhesives, sealants and elastomers (collectively, CASE products). Powdered polyester resins are used in coating applications. CASE and powdered polyester resins are collectively referred to as specialty polyols. Phthalic anhydride is used in unsaturated polyester resins, alkyd resins and plasticizers for applications in construction materials and components of automotive, boating and other consumer products. In addition, the Company uses phthalic anhydride internally in the production of polyols. In the United States, polyurethane polyols are manufactured at the Company’s Elwood, Illinois (Millsdale) and Wilmington, North Carolina sites. Phthalic anhydride is manufactured at the Company’s Millsdale site and specialty polyols are manufactured at the Company’s Columbus, Georgia, site. In Europe, polyurethane polyols are manufactured at the Company’s plants in Germany and the Netherlands and specialty polyols are manufactured at the Company’s Poland site. In Asia, polyurethane polyols and specialty polyols are manufactured at the Company’s Nanjing, China, plant.
Specialty Products – Specialty products, which accounted for three percent of consolidated net sales in 2024, include flavors, emulsifiers and solubilizers used in food, flavoring, nutritional supplement and pharmaceutical applications. Specialty products are primarily manufactured at the Company’s Maywood, New Jersey site.
Deferred Compensation Plans
The accounting for the Company’s deferred compensation plans can cause period-to-period fluctuations in Company income and expenses. Compensation expense is recognized when the value of the Company’s common stock and mutual fund investment assets held for the plans increase, and compensation income is recognized when the value of the Company’s common stock and mutual fund investment assets decline. The pretax effect of all deferred compensation-related activities (including realized and unrealized gains and losses on the mutual fund assets held to fund deferred compensation obligations) and the income statement line items in which the effects of the activities were recorded are displayed in the following tables:
Income (Expense)
For the YearEnded December 31,
Deferred Compensation (Administrative expenses) $ (2.2 ) $ (4.4 ) $ 2.2 (1)
Investment Income (Other, net) 1.3 0.8 0.5
Realized/Unrealized Gains on Investments (Other, net) 3.3 4.3 (1.0 )
Pretax Income Effect $ 2.4 $ 0.7 $ 1.7
23
Income (Expense)
For the YearEnded December 31,
Deferred Compensation (Administrative expenses) $ (4.4 ) $ 9.4 $ (13.8 ) (1)
Investment Income (Other, net) 0.8 1.7 (0.9 )
Realized/Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Investments (Other, net) 4.3 (8.0 ) 12.3
Pretax Income Effect $ 0.7 $ 3.1 $ (2.4 )
(1)
See the Segment Results – Corporate Expenses section of this MD&A for details regarding the period-over-period changes in deferred compensation.
Below are the year-end Company common stock market prices used in the computation of deferred compensation income and expense:
December 31
Effects of Foreign Currency Translation
The Company’s foreign subsidiaries transact business and report financial results in their respective local currencies. As a result, foreign subsidiary income statements are translated into U.S. dollars at average foreign exchange rates appropriate for the reporting period. Because foreign exchange rates fluctuate against the U.S. dollar over time, foreign currency translation affects year-over-year comparisons of financial statement items (i.e., because foreign exchange rates fluctuate, similar year-over-year local currency results for a foreign subsidiary may translate into different U.S. dollar results). The following tables present the effects that foreign currency translation had on the year-over-year changes in consolidated net sales and various income statement line items for 2024 compared to 2023 and 2023 compared to 2022:
For the YearEnded December 31, Increase(Decrease) Dueto Foreign
(In millions) 2024 2023 Increase(Decrease) CurrencyTranslation
For the YearEnded December 31, Increase Dueto Foreign
(In millions) 2023 2022 Decrease CurrencyTranslation
Results of Operations
2024 Compared with 2023
Summary
Net income in 2024 increased $10.2 million, or 25 percent, to $50.4 million, or $2.20 per diluted share, from $40.2 million, or $1.75 per diluted share in 2023. Adjusted net income was $50.5 million, or $2.20 per diluted share in 2024 versus $50.7 million, or $2.21 per diluted share in 2023 (see the “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Adjusted Net Income and Diluted Earnings per Share” section of this MD&A for a reconciliation between reported net income and reported earnings per diluted share and non-GAAP adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per diluted share). Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) were $186.8
24
million in 2024, up 13 percent, versus $165.8 million in 2023. Adjusted EBITDA was $187.0 million in 2024, up 4 percent, versus $180.0 million in 2023. (See the “Reconciliation of non-GAAP EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA” section of this MD&A for a reconciliation between reported operating income and non-GAAP EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA). Below is a summary discussion of the major factors leading to the changes in net sales, expenses and income in 2024 compared to 2023. A detailed discussion of segment operating performance for 2024, compared to 2023, follows the summary.
Consolidated net sales decreased $145.5 million, or six percent, between years. Lower average selling prices negatively impacted the year-over-year change in net sales by $160.3 million. The decrease in average selling prices was mainly attributable to the pass-through of lower raw material costs and competitive activity within certain end markets. Consolidated sales volume increased one percent and positively impacted the year-over-year change in net sales by $17.3 million. Surfactant and Specialty Products sales volume increased two percent and seven percent, respectively. Polymer sales volume decreased four percent. Foreign currency translation negatively impacted the year-over-year change in net sales by $2.5 million, primarily due to a stronger U.S. dollar against the Brazilian real and Mexican peso.
Operating income in 2024 increased $11.9 million, or 20 percent, versus operating income in 2023. Surfactant and Specialty Products operating income increased $13.2 million and $9.4 million, respectively, year-over-year. Polymer operating income decreased $20.1 million in 2024 versus 2023. Corporate expenses, including deferred compensation, environmental remediation, business restructuring, asset/goodwill/other intangibles impairment charges and expenses associated with a criminal social engineering scheme impacting one of the Company’s subsidiaries in Asia, decreased $9.4 million, or 11 percent, year-over-year. Most of this decrease was attributable to the non-recurrence of business restructuring and asset/goodwill/other intangibles impairment expenses ($14.0 million) in 2023, partially offset by $6.8 million of expenses associated with a criminal social engineering scheme in 2024. Foreign currency translation had a $0.8 million negative impact on operating income year-over-year.
Operating expenses (including deferred compensation, business restructuring and asset/goodwill/other intangibles impairments) decreased $17.3 million, or eight percent, year-over-year. Changes in the individual income statement line items that comprise the Company’s operating expenses were as follows:
•
Selling expenses decreased $2.7 million, or six percent, between years primarily due to lower salary expenses resulting from workforce productivity measures implemented in late 2023 and lower bad debt provision expenses in 2024 versus 2023.
•
Administrative expenses increased $5.1 million, or five percent, year-over-year. This increase was primarily due to a $6.8 million expense recognized for a criminal social engineering scheme impacting one of the Company’s subsidiaries in Asia, higher expenses associated with the CEO transition in the fourth quarter of 2024 and higher environmental reserve expenses. The higher environmental expenses reflect a reserve adjustment for environmental costs related to property formerly owned and operated by the Company in Wilmington, Massachusetts. Lower salary expenses, resulting from productivity measures implemented in late 2023, partially offset the above.
•
Research, development and technical service (R&D) expenses decreased $3.4 million, or six percent, year-over-year primarily due to lower salary expenses resulting from workforce productivity measures implemented in late 2023.
•
Deferred compensation expense decreased $2.2 million, year-over-year, primarily due to a smaller increase in the value of mutual fund investment assets held for the plans during 2024 versus 2023. Additionally, the market price of the Company’s common stock decreased $29.85 per share in 2024 versus an $11.91 per share decrease during 2023. See the Overview and Segment Results - Corporate Expenses sections of this MD&A for further details.
•
The Company did not incur any business restructuring and asset impairment expense in 2024 versus $12.0 million in 2023. The 2023 expenses were primarily attributable to a $5.5 million restructuring reserve, recorded in the third quarter of 2023, associated with the Company’s voluntary early retirement offering to eligible employees and $2.9 million of restructuring expense, associated with workforce productivity measures, recognized in the fourth quarter of 2023. The Company also recognized $3.2 million of asset impairment charges in the fourth quarter of 2023. These asset impairment charges mainly related to assets that were no longer in use and the write-off of engineering costs associated with projects the Company no longer deemed viable. See Note 22, Business Restructuring and Assets Impairment, of the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements (included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K) for additional details.
•
The Company did not recognize any goodwill or other intangible impairment expense in 2024 versus $2.0 million in 2023. In 2023, the Company recognized $1.0 million of goodwill impairment expense related to its Colombia reporting unit and $1.0 million of goodwill and other intangibles impairment expense related to its Lipid Nutrition reporting unit. See Note 4, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, of the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements (included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K) for additional details.
25
Net interest expense in 2024 increased $2.1 million, or 17 percent, versus the prior year. This increase was primarily attributable to higher interest rates on the Company’s revolving credit facility in 2024 versus 2023 along with higher interest expense in Latin America associated with a one-time tax proceeding reserve.
Other, net was $4.1 million of income in 2024 versus $1.9 million of income in 2023. The Company recognized $4.6 million of investment gains (including realized and unrealized gains and losses) for the Company’s deferred compensation and supplemental defined contribution mutual fund assets in 2024 compared to $5.2 million of investment gains in 2023. In addition, the Company recognized $2.3 million of lower foreign exchange losses in 2024 than in 2023 ($1.4 million of foreign exchange losses in 2024 versus $3.7 million of foreign exchange losses in 2023). The Company also recognized $1.0 million of net periodic pension and other retirement obligations income in 2024 versus $0.4 million of income in 2023.
The Company’s effective tax rate was 16.7 percent in 2024 versus 16.9 percent in 2023. This small decrease was comprised of various offsetting items. See Note 9, Income Taxes, of the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements (included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K) for a reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to the effective tax rate.
Segment Results
(In thousands) For the YearEnded December 31,
Net Sales 2024 2023 Decrease PercentChange
(In thousands) For the YearEnded December 31,
Operating Income 2024 2023 Increase(Decrease) PercentChange
26
Surfactants
Surfactant net sales in 2024 decreased $70.7 million, or four percent, versus the prior year. Lower average selling prices negatively impacted the change in net sales by $97.2 million. The lower average selling prices were primarily due to the pass-through of lower raw material costs and increased competitive pressure within certain end-use markets. Foreign currency translation had a $12.9 million unfavorable impact on the year-over-year change in net sales. Sales volume increased two percent and favorably impacted the change in net sales by $39.4 million. A year-over-year comparison of net sales by region follows:
For the YearEnded December 31,
(In thousands) 2024 2023 Increase(Decrease) PercentChange
Net sales for North American operations decreased $55.1 million, or six percent, between years. Lower average selling prices had a $40.8 million unfavorable impact on the year-over-year change in net sales. The lower average selling prices were primarily due to the pass-through of lower raw material costs and less favorable product mix. Sales volume declined one percent and negatively impacted the year-over-year change in net sales by $13.8 million. The lower sales volume primarily reflects lower demand for products sold into agricultural end markets due to customer and channel inventory destocking during the first half of 2024. In addition, sales volume into the personal care end markets was negatively impacted by operational issues, partially related to a flood event at the Millsdale site, during the first half of 2024. Higher demand for products sold into the oil field end markets and to our distribution partners partially offset the aforementioned decreases. Foreign currency translation negatively impacted the change in net sales by $0.5 million.
Net sales for European operations decreased $25.2 million, or nine percent, primarily due to lower average selling prices that negatively impacted the change in net sales by $45.8 million. The lower average selling prices were primarily due to the pass-through of lower raw material costs and increased competitive activity within certain end-use markets. Sales volume increased six percent and positively impacted the change in net sales by $17.8 million. The higher sales volume was primarily due to higher demand for products sold into the industrial cleaning and personal care end markets and to our distribution partners. Foreign currency translation positively impacted the year-over-year change in net sales by $2.8 million. A weaker U.S. dollar relative to the British pound sterling and European euro led to the favorable foreign currency translation effect.
Net sales for Latin American operations increased $14.6 million, or five percent, primarily due to a nine percent increase in sales volume which positively impacted the year-over-year change in net sales by $26.3 million. The higher sales volume was primarily due to higher demand for products sold into the laundry and cleaning and agricultural end markets combined with higher demand for products sold to our distribution partners. Higher average selling prices positively impacted the change in net sales by $2.0 million. A stronger U.S. dollar relative to the Brazilian real and Mexican peso led to a $13.7 million unfavorable foreign currency translation effect.
Net sales for Asian Surfactant operations decreased $5.0 million, or eight percent, year-over-year. Lower average selling prices, the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation and a one percent decrease in sales volume negatively impacted the year-over-year change in net sales by $3.1 million, $1.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The decline in average selling prices reflects the pass-through of lower raw material costs. The decline in sales volume primarily reflects lower demand for products sold into the commodity laundry and cleaning markets that was partially offset by higher demand from our distribution partners and products sold to the personal care end markets.
27
Surfactant operating income for 2024 increased $13.2 million, or 18 percent, versus operating income reported in 2023. Gross profit increased $8.7 million, or five percent, and operating expenses decreased $4.5 million, or five percent. Year-over-year comparisons of gross profit by region and total segment operating expenses and operating income follow:
For the YearEnded December 31,
(In thousands) 2024 2023 Increase(Decrease) PercentChange
Gross Profit and Operating Income
Gross profit for North American operations decreased $11.6 million, or 10 percent, due to lower average unit margins and a one percent decline in sales volume. These items negatively impacted the year-over-year change in gross profit by $10.0 million and $1.6 million, respectively. The lower average unit margins were mostly attributable to less favorable product mix, higher pre-operating expenses associated with the alkoxylation production facility in Pasadena, Texas and higher expenses incurred at the Company’s Millsdale plant site due to operational issues, partially related to a flood event, during the first half of 2024.
Gross profit for European operations increased $5.4 million, or 20 percent, due to higher average unit margins, a six percent increase in sales volume and the favorable impact of foreign currency translation. These items positively impacted the year-over-year change in gross profit by $3.5 million, $1.6 million, and $0.2 million, respectively. The higher average unit margins primarily reflect a more favorable product mix.
Gross profit for Latin American operations increased $15.1 million, or 60 percent, primarily due to higher average unit margins and a nine percent increase in sales volume. These items positively impacted the year-over-year change in gross profit by $15.1 million and $2.2. million, respectively. The higher average unit margins were primarily due to higher demand for products sold into the agricultural end markets partially offset by a one-time tax proceeding reserve established in the fourth quarter of 2024. Foreign currency translation negatively impacted the year-over-year change in gross profit by $2.2 million.
Gross profit for Asian operations decreased $0.2 million or two percent, year-over-year due primarily to lower average unit margins and a one percent decrease in sales volume.
Operating expenses for the Surfactant segment decreased $4.5 million, or five percent, year-over-year. Most of this decrease was attributable to lower salary expenses and bad debt provision expenses.
Polymers
Polymer net sales in 2024 decreased $57.6 million, or nine percent, versus the prior year. Lower average selling prices and a four percent decrease in sales volume negatively impacted the year-over-year change in net sales by $40.0 million and $28.0 million, respectively. Foreign currency translation positively impacted the year-over-year change in net sales by $10.4 million. A year-over-year comparison of net sales by region follows:
For the YearEnded December 31,
(In thousands) 2024 2023 Increase(Decrease) PercentChange
Net sales for North American operations decreased $49.2 million, or 15 percent, due to a 10 percent decrease in sales volume and lower average selling prices. These items negatively impacted the year-over-year change in net sales by $32.7 million and $16.5 million, respectively. Sales volume within the commodity phthalic anhydride business decreased 32 percent primarily due to operational issues at the Millsdale plant during the first half of 2024. Sales volume of polyols used in rigid foam applications decreased nine percent
28
year-over-year mostly due to soft demand during the second half of 2024. Sales volume of specialty polyols increased five percent year-over-year. The lower average selling prices primarily reflect the pass-through of lower raw material costs.
Net sales for European Polymer operations decreased $13.0 million, or five percent, year-over-year. Lower average selling prices and a two percent decline in sales volume negatively impacted the year-over-year change in net sales by $18.6 million and $5.7 million, respectively. The lower average selling prices were mainly due to pass-through of lower raw material costs and increased competitive activity. Foreign currency translation positively impacted the change in net sales by $11.3 million. A weaker U.S. dollar relative to the Polish zloty and British pound sterling led to the favorable foreign currency translation effect.
Net sales for Asian and Other operations increased $4.6 million, or 10 percent, primarily due to an 11 percent increase in sales volume which positively impacted the year-over-year change in net sales by $4.8 million. The higher sales volume was driven by the non-recurrence of COVID lock downs and restrictions that were in place in China in the first half of 2023 and higher demand for specialty polyols resulting from the Company’s product diversification efforts. Higher average selling prices positively impacted the change in net sales by $0.6 million. Foreign currency translation negatively impacted the year-over-year change in net sales by $0.8 million.
Polymer operating income for 2024 decreased $20.1 million, or 33 percent, versus operating income for 2023. Gross profit decreased $20.9 million, or 23 percent, and operating expenses were down $0.7 million, or three percent, year-over-year. Year-over-year comparisons of gross profit by region and total segment operating expenses and operating income follow:
For the YearEnded December 31,
(In thousands) 2024 2023 Increase(Decrease) PercentChange
Gross Profit and Operating Income
Gross profit for North American operations decreased $16.1 million, or 36 percent, due to lower average unit margins and a 10 percent decline in sales volume. These items negatively impacted the year-over-year change in gross profit by $11.7 million and $4.3 million, respectively. The lower average unit margins were primarily due to a phthalic anhydride related catalyst write-off ($2.1 million) during the second quarter of 2024, higher expenses incurred at the Company’s Millsdale plant due to operational issues during the first half of 2024 and higher expenses associated with a planned phthalic anhydride plant maintenance shut-down in the fourth quarter of 2024.
Gross profit for European Polymer operations decreased $7.3 million, or 18 percent, year-over-year. This decrease was primarily due to lower average unit margins and a two percent decline in sales volume that negatively impacted the change in gross profit by $7.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively. The lower average unit margins primarily reflect mandatory maintenance shutdown at the Company’s Germany site and increased competitive activity in the region. Foreign currency translation had a $1.0 million favorable impact on the year-over year change in gross profit.
Gross profit for Asia and Other operations increased $2.4 million primarily due to higher average unit margins and an 11 percent increase in sales volume. These items positively impacted the year-over-year change in gross profit by $2.0 million and $0.5 million, respectively. Foreign currency translation had a $0.1 million negative impact on the year-over-year change in gross profit.
Operating expenses for the Polymers segment decreased $0.7 million, or three percent, year-over-year primarily due to lower salary expenses and bad debt provision expenses.
Specialty Products
Specialty Products net sales in 2024 decreased $17.2 million, or 21 percent, versus net sales in 2023. The year-over-year decline in net sales was due to lower average selling prices that were partially offset by a seven percent increase in sales volume. Gross profit and operating income increased $9.0 million and $9.4 million, respectively, year-over-year. The year-over-year increases in gross profit and operating income were mostly attributable to margin recovery and higher sales volume within the medium chain triglycerides (MCT)
29
product line. The margin recovery was primarily due to the non-recurrence of high-cost raw material inventory carryover experienced during 2023.
Corporate Expenses
Corporate expenses, which include deferred compensation, business restructuring, asset/goodwill/other intangibles impairment charges and other operating expenses that are not allocated to the reportable segments, decreased $9.4 million, or 11 percent, between years. The decrease was mainly due to the non-recurrence of $14.0 million of business restructuring and asset/goodwill/other intangibles impairment charges that were recognized in 2023. In addition, deferred compensation expenses were $2.2 million in 2024 versus $4.4 million in 2023, a $2.2 million decrease year-over-year. Partially offsetting the aforementioned decreases was $6.8 million of pre-tax charges associated with a criminal social engineering scheme impacting one of the Company’s subsidiaries in Asia (see Note 24, Other Matter, of the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K).
The $2.2 million decrease in deferred compensation expense was primarily due to a smaller increase in the value of mutual fund investment assets held for the plans during 2024 versus 2023. Additionally, the market price of the Company’s common stock decreased $29.85 per share in 2024 versus an $11.91 per share decrease during 2023. The following table presents the period-end Company common stock market prices used in the computation of deferred compensation income/expense in 2024, 2023 and 2022:
December 31
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
Historically, the Company’s principal sources of liquidity have included cash flows from operating activities, available cash and cash equivalents and the proceeds from debt issuance and borrowings under credit facilities. The Company’s principal uses of cash have included funding operating activities, capital investments and acquisitions. The Company’s generation of cash from operations, cash on hand, committed credit facilities and ability to access capital markets are expected to meet the Company’s short-term and long-term cash requirements for working capital, capital expenditures, debt maturities, contributions to pension plans, dividend distributions to stockholders, share repurchases and other needs.
For 2024, cash generated from operating activities was a cash source of $162.1 million versus a source of $174.9 million in 2023. For 2024, investing cash outflows were $116.9 million versus cash outflows of $258.7 million in 2023. Financing activities were a cash use of $64.5 million in 2024 versus a source of $33.3 million in 2023. Cash and cash equivalents decreased by $30.2 million compared to December 31, 2023, inclusive of a $10.7 million unfavorable foreign exchange rate impact.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents totaled $99.7 million including $12.6 million in money market funds and $1.2 million in U.S. demand deposit accounts. Cash and cash equivalents of the Company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries held outside the U.S. totaled $85.9 million as of December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 2023, cash in U.S. demand deposit accounts and money market funds totaled $6.4 million and $15.1 million, respectively. The Company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries held $108.3 million of cash outside the United States as of December 31, 2023.
Operating Activities
Net income increased by $10.2 million, or 25 percent, in 2024 versus the prior year. Working capital was a cash source of $5.8 million in 2024 versus a cash source of $13.4 million in 2023.
Accounts receivable were a cash source of $9.0 million in 2024 compared to a cash source of $32.0 million in 2023. Inventories were a cash use of $37.2 million in 2024 versus a cash source of $144.8 million in 2023. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities were a cash source of $34.0 million in 2024 compared to a cash use of $158.9 million in 2023.
Working capital requirements were a slightly lower source in 2024 compared to 2023 primarily due to the changes noted above. The change in inventories working capital primarily reflects targeted inventory builds, partially related to planned maintenance turnarounds, and higher unit cost in 2024. The change in accounts payable and accrued liabilities primarily reflects higher trade payables and incentive-based compensation accruals in 2024 versus a year ago. It is management’s opinion that the Company’s liquidity is reasonably sufficient to provide for potential increases in working capital requirements during 2025.
30
Investing Activities
Cash used for investing activities decreased $141.7 million year-over-year and was primarily due to a $137.6 million decrease in capital expenditures. Cash used for capital expenditures was $122.8 million in 2024 versus $260.3 million in 2023. The year-over-year decrease was mainly due to a reduction in the expenditures required to construct the alkoxylation plant the Company is building at its Pasadena, Texas site. The new facility is expected to start up in the first quarter of 2025.
For 2025, the Company estimates that total capital expenditures will be in the range of $125.0 million to $135.0 million. This full year projected spending includes completion of the new alkoxylation plant that is being built in Pasadena, Texas, along with growth initiatives, infrastructure and optimization initiatives.
Financing Activities
Cash flow from financing activities was a use of $64.5 million in 2024 versus a source of $33.3 million in 2023. The year-over-year change was primarily due to a lower level of borrowings against the Company’s revolving credit facility and higher scheduled debt repayments in 2024 versus the comparable period in 2023.
The Company purchases shares of its common stock in the open market or from its benefit plans from time to time to fund its own benefit plans and to mitigate the dilutive effect of new shares issued under its compensation plans. The Company may, from time to time, seek to purchase additional amounts of its outstanding equity and/or retire debt securities through cash purchases and/or exchanges for other securities, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, including pursuant to plans meeting the requirements of Rule 10b5-1 promulgated by the SEC. While the amounts involved may be material, such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, the Company’s liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, the Company did not purchase any shares of its common stock on the open market. At December 31, 2024, the Company had $125.1 million remaining for future repurchases under the share repurchase program authorized by its Board of Directors.
Debt and Credit Facilities
Consolidated balance sheet debt decreased $28.7 million, from $654.1 million on December 31, 2023 to $625.4 million on December 31, 2024, primarily due to scheduled debt repayments. Net debt (which is defined as total debt minus cash – See the “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Net Debt” section of this MD&A) was $525.7 million in 2024 versus $524.3 million in 2023.
On December 31, 2024, the Company’s debt included $311.7 million of unsecured notes, with maturities ranging from 2025 through 2032, that were issued to insurance companies in private placement transactions pursuant to note purchase agreements (the “Note Purchase Agreements”), inclusive of a $90.0 million delayed-draw term loan borrowed pursuant to the Company’s credit agreement, and $313.7 million of short-term loans borrowed under the Company’s revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had an outstanding letter of credit of $12.9 million inclusive of $4.2 million issued under the Company’s revolving credit facility. The proceeds from the note issuances have been the Company’s primary source of long-term debt financing and are supplemented by borrowings under bank credit facilities to meet short and medium-term liquidity needs.
On August 27, 2024, the Company entered into amendments to two of its note purchase agreements to increase the available facility amounts and extend the end date of the issuance period to August 27, 2027. The Company’s credit agreement (the Credit Agreement) with a syndicate of banks provides for credit facilities in an initial aggregate principal amount of $450.0 million, consisting of (a) a $350.0 million multi-currency revolving credit facility and (b) a $100.0 million delayed draw term loan credit facility ($10.0 million of the term loan principal has been permanently repaid as scheduled), each of which matures on June 24, 2027. The Company's credit agreement with Credit Industriel et Commercial NY (the CIC Credit Agreement) provides for a credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $8.7 million. The facility is for the sole purpose of the issuance of standby letters of credit. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had outstanding letters of credit totaling $8.7 million under the CIC Credit Agreement. The Company also maintains import and export letters of credit. and standby letters of credit under its workers’ compensation insurance agreements and for other purposes, as needed from time to time, which are issued under the Credit Agreement. These outstanding letters of credit totaled $4.2 million at December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 2024, the ratio of net debt to net debt plus shareholders’ equity was 31.0 percent versus 30.0 percent as of December 31, 2023 (see the “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Net Debt” section in this MD&A for further details).
The Company anticipates that cash from operations, committed credit facilities and cash on hand will be reasonably sufficient to fund anticipated capital expenditures, working capital, dividends and other planned financial commitments for the foreseeable future.
31
Certain foreign subsidiaries of the Company maintain short-term bank lines of credit in their respective local currencies to meet working capital requirements as well as to fund capital expenditures and acquisitions. At December 31, 2024, there was no debt held by foreign subsidiaries.
The Company is subject to covenants under its material debt agreements that require the maintenance of minimum interest coverage and minimum net worth. These debt covenants also limit the incurrence of additional debt as well as the payment of dividends and repurchase of shares. Under the most restrictive of these debt covenants:
3. The Company is required to maintain net worth of at least $750.0 million.
The Company believes it was in compliance with the covenants under its material debt agreements as of December 31, 2024.
Material Cash Requirements
At December 31, 2024, the Company’s material cash requirements included the following contractual obligations (including estimated payments by period):
Payments Due by Period
(In thousands) Total Less than1 year 1-3 years 3 – 5 years More than5 years
(1)
Excludes unamortized debt issuance costs of $0.4 million.
(2)
Interest payments on debt obligations represent interest on all Company debt at December 31, 2024. Future interest rates may change, and, therefore, actual interest payments could differ from those disclosed in the above table.
(3)
The majority of operating lease obligations consist of railcar and real estate leases.
(4)
Purchase obligations consist of raw material, utility and telecommunication service purchases made in the normal course of business.
(5)
The “Other” category comprises deferred revenues that represent commitments to deliver products, estimated payments related to the Company’s unfunded defined benefit supplemental executive and outside director pension plans, estimated payments (undiscounted) related to the Company’s asset retirement obligations, environmental remediation payments for which amounts and periods can be reasonably estimated and income tax liabilities for which payments and periods can be reasonably estimated and payments related to the Company’s voluntary early retirement plan.
The above table does not include $29.6 million of other non-current liabilities recorded on the balance sheet at December 31, 2024, as summarized in Note 15, Other Non-Current Liabilities, of the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements (included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K). The significant non-current liabilities excluded from the table are defined benefit pension, deferred compensation, environmental and legal liabilities for which payment periods cannot be reasonably determined. In addition, deferred income tax liabilities are excluded from the table due to the uncertainty of their timing.
32
During the periods covered by this Form 10-K, the Company was not party to any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on the Company’s financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, cash requirements or capital resources.
Pension Plans
The Company sponsors a number of defined benefit pension plans, the most significant of which cover employees in the Company’s U.S. and U.K. locations. The U.S. and U.K. plans are frozen, and service benefit accruals are no longer being made. The overfunded status (pretax) of the Company’s U.S and U.K. defined benefit pension plans was $2.3 million at December 31, 2024, versus overfunded status (pretax) of $8.2 million at December 31, 2023. See Note 13, Postretirement Benefit Plans, of the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements (included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K) for additional details.
The Company contributed $0.2 million to its U.S. defined benefit plans in 2024. U.K. did not make any defined benefit contributions to its plan in 2024. As a result of pension funding relief included in the Highway and Transportation Funding Act of 2014, the Company has no 2025 contribution requirement to the U.S. qualified defined benefit plans. The company expects to contribute $0.2 million in 2025 to the unfunded non-qualified U.S. pension plans.
Letters of Credit
The Company maintains standby letters of credit under its workers’ compensation insurance agreements and for other purposes as needed. The insurance letters of credit are renewed annually and amended to the amounts required by the insurance agreements. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had a total of $4.2 million of outstanding standby letters of credit from the Credit Agreement with the syndicate of banks and $8.7 million under CIC Credit Agreement.
Environmental and Legal Matters
The Company’s operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations and similar laws in the other countries in which the Company does business. Although the Company’s environmental policies and practices are designed to ensure compliance with these laws and regulations, future developments and increasingly stringent environmental regulation may require the Company to make additional unforeseen environmental expenditures. The Company will continue to invest in the equipment and facilities necessary to comply with existing and future regulations. During 2024, the Company’s expenditures for capital projects related to environmental matters were $12.0 million. These projects are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives, which are typically 10 years. Recurring costs associated with the operation and maintenance of facilities for waste treatment and disposal and managing environmental compliance in ongoing operations at the Company’s manufacturing locations were $51.3 million for 2024, $38.3 million for 2023 and $37.2 million for 2022.
Over the years, the Company has received requests for information related to or has been named by the government as a potentially responsible party at a number of waste disposal sites where cleanup costs have been or may be incurred under CERCLA and similar state or foreign statutes. In addition, the Company is from time to time involved in routine legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of its business, including personal injury, property damage, tax, trade and labor matters. The Company believes that it has made adequate provisions for the costs it is likely to incur with respect to these claims. It is the Company’s accounting policy to record liabilities when environmental assessments, remediation expenses or legal proceeding losses are probable, and the cost or range of possible costs can be reasonably estimated. When no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, the minimum is accrued. Estimating the possible costs of environmental remediation requires making assumptions related to the nature and extent of contamination and the methods and resulting costs of remediation. Some of the factors on which the Company bases its estimates include information provided by decisions rendered by State and Federal environmental regulatory agencies, information provided by feasibility studies, and remedial action plans developed. After partial remediation payments at certain sites, the Company has estimated a range of possible environmental and legal losses of $20.0 million to $44.5 million at December 31, 2024, and $20.6 million to $49.4 million at December 31, 2023. Within the range of possible environmental and legal losses, management has currently concluded that no single amount is more likely to occur than any other amounts in the range and, thus, has accrued at the lower end of the range. The Company’s environmental and legal accruals totaled $20.0 million at December 31, 2024 as compared to $20.6 million at December 31, 2023. During 2024, cash expenditures related to environmental remediation and certain other legal matters approximated $7.0 million compared to $13.2 million in 2023.
For certain sites, the Company has responded to information requests made by federal, state or local government agencies but has received no response confirming or denying the Company’s stated positions. As such, estimates of the total costs, or range of possible costs, of remediation, if any, or the Company’s share of such costs, if any, cannot be determined with respect to these sites. Consequently, the Company is unable to predict the effect thereof on the Company’s financial position, cash flows and results of operations. Based on the Company’s present knowledge with respect to its involvement at these sites, the possibility of other viable entities’ responsibilities
33
for cleanup, and the extended period over which any costs would be incurred, management believes that the Company has no material liability at these sites and that these matters, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position.
See Item 3. Legal Proceedings, in this Form 10-K and Note 16, Contingencies, in the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements (included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K) for a summary of the significant environmental proceedings related to certain sites.
Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies
The Company prepares its financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (generally accepted accounting principles or GAAP). Preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses at the date of the financial statements and to provide disclosures of contingent assets, liabilities and related amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The following is a summary of the accounting policies the Company believes are the most important to aid in understanding its financial results:
Environmental Liabilities
It is the Company’s accounting policy to record environmental liabilities when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable, and the cost or range of possible costs can be reasonably estimated. When no amount within a range of possible costs is a better estimate than any other amount, the minimum amount in the range is accrued. Estimating the possible costs of remediation requires making assumptions related to the nature and extent of contamination and the methods and resulting costs of remediation. Some of the factors on which the Company bases its estimates include information provided by discussions with and decisions rendered by State and Federal environmental regulatory agencies, information provided by feasibility studies, and remedial action plans developed.
Estimates for environmental liabilities are subject to potentially significant fluctuations as new facts emerge related to the various sites where the Company is exposed to liability for the remediation of environmental contamination. See the Environmental and Legal Matters section of this MD&A for discussion of the Company’s recorded liabilities and range of cost estimates.
Goodwill
The Company’s intangible assets include goodwill acquired as part of business or product line acquisitions. Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment on a reporting unit level. The Company’s reporting units are typically defined as one level below operating segments and highly correlated to geographic regions. The Company tests goodwill for impairment annually (the Company conducts its goodwill impairment testing during the second quarter of each calendar year), or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit to which goodwill relates has declined below its carrying value. In this case, the Company would recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment using qualitative and/or quantitative testing procedures. The Company has the option to first perform qualitative testing to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If the Company chooses not to complete a qualitative assessment for a given reporting unit, or if the initial assessment indicates that it is more likely than not that the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, additional quantitative testing is performed.
When estimating a reporting unit’s fair value as part of the quantitative assessment, the Company uses a combination of market and income-based methodologies. The market approach uses a combination of EBITDA and EBITDA multiples to estimate a reporting unit’s fair value. EBITDA multiples typically mirror similar businesses or comparative companies whose securities are actively traded in public markets. Significant degradation of either EBITDA or EBITDA multiples could result in a triggering event, requiring goodwill to be tested for impairment during an interim period. The income approach takes into consideration multiple variables, including forecasted sales volume and operating income, current industry and economic conditions, historical results and other elements to calculate the present value of future cash flows. The income approach fair value calculations include estimates of long-term growth rates and discount rates that are commensurate with the risks and uncertainty inherent in the respective reporting units. The Company reported goodwill and other intangible assets impairment expenses during 2023 and goodwill impairment expenses during 2022. See Note 4, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, of the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements (included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K) for additional information.
34
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements (included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K) for information on recent accounting pronouncements which affect the Company.
Non-GAAP Reconciliations
The Company believes that certain non-GAAP measures, when presented in conjunction with comparable GAAP measures, are useful for evaluating the Company’s performance and financial condition. Internally, the Company uses this non-GAAP information as an indicator of business performance and evaluates management’s effectiveness with specific reference to these indicators. Management uses these non-GAAP financial measures to assist in analyzing what management views as the Company’s core operating performance for purposes of business decision making. Management believes that presenting these non-GAAP financial measures provides investors with useful supplemental information because they (i) provide meaningful supplemental information regarding financial performance by excluding items affecting comparability between periods, (ii) permit investors to view performance using the same tools that management uses to budget, make operating and strategic decisions and evaluate the Company’s core operating performance across periods, and (iii) otherwise provide supplemental information that may be useful to investors in evaluating the Company’s financial results. In addition, the Company believes that the presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures, when considered together with the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures and the reconciliations to those GAAP financial measures, provides investors with additional tools to understand the factors and trends affecting the Company’s underlying business than could be obtained absent these disclosures. These measures should be considered in addition to, not as substitutes for or superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP and there are limitations to using non-GAAP financial measures. For example, the non-GAAP financial measures presented in this Form 10-K may differ from similarly titled non-GAAP financial measures presented by other companies and other companies may not define these non-GAAP financial measures the same way as the Company does.
Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Adjusted Net Income and Diluted Earnings per Share
Management uses the non-GAAP adjusted net income metric to evaluate the Company’s operating performance. Management excludes the items listed in the table below because they are non-operational items. The cumulative tax effect was calculated using the statutory tax rates for the jurisdictions in which the transactions occurred.
Twelve Months Ended December 31
Goodwill and Other Intangibles Impairment Expense — — 2.00 0.09 — —
Cash Settled Stock Appreciation Rights (Income) — — (0.1 ) — (0.4 ) (0.01 )
35
Reconciliations of Non-GAAP EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
Management uses the non-GAAP EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA metric to evaluate the Company’s operating performance. Management excludes the items listed in the table below because they are non-operational items. Refer to the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income for a bridge between Operating Income and Net Income.
For the YearEnded December 31,
Depreciation and Amortization 112.2 105.3
Other, Net Income 4.1 1.9
Deferred Compensation (2.4 ) (0.7 )
Cash Settled SARs — (0.1 )
Goodwill and Other Intangibles Impairment — 2.0
Business Restructuring/Asset Impairment — 12.0
Environmental Remediation 2.6 1.0
Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Net Debt
Management uses the non-GAAP net debt metric to show a more complete picture of the Company’s overall liquidity, financial flexibility and leverage level.
December 31
Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt as Reported $ 292.8 $ 252.9
Long-Term Debt as Reported $ 332.6 $ 401.2
Less Cash and Cash Equivalents as Reported $ (99.7 ) $ (129.8 )
Net Debt/Net Debt plus Equity 31 % 30 %
36
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Because the Company operates globally, its cash flows and operating results are subject to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. Except for the financial transactions, balances and forward contracts referred to below, most of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries’ financial instruments are denominated in their respective functional currencies.
The Company uses forward contracts to mitigate the exposure of certain foreign currency transactions and balances to fluctuating exchange rates. At December 31, 2024, the Company had forward contracts with an aggregated notional amount of $149.6 million. Except for the Company’s subsidiaries in Argentina, Brazil, China and Colombia, foreign currency exposures are substantially hedged by forward contracts. The fair value of all forward contracts as of December 31, 2024, was a net asset of $0.6 million. As of December 31, 2024, the potential reduction in the Company’s earnings resulting from the impact of hypothetical adverse changes in exchange rates on the fair value of its outstanding foreign currency contracts of 10 percent for all currencies would have been $3.7 million.
Interest Rates
The Company’s debt was comprised of $311.7 million fixed-rate borrowings, $313.7 million variable-rate borrowings and no foreign subsidiaries unsecured debt as of December 31, 2024. A hypothetical 10 percent average change to short-term interest rates would result in a $1.8 million (assuming the same debt level as December 31, 2024) increase or decrease to interest expense for 2025.
The fair value of the Company’s long term fixed-rate debt, including current maturities, was estimated to be $285.2 million as of December 31, 2024, which was approximately $27.0 million below the carrying value. Market risk was estimated as the potential increase to the fair value that would result from a hypothetical 10 percent decrease in the Company’s weighted average long-term borrowing rates as of December 31, 2024, or $4.9 million.
Commodity Price Risk
Certain raw materials used in the manufacture of the Company’s products are subject to price volatility caused by weather, petroleum price fluctuations, general economic demand and other unpredictable factors. Increased raw material costs are recovered from customers as quickly as the marketplace allows; however, certain contractual arrangements allow for price changes only on a quarterly basis, and competitive pressures sometimes prevent the recovery of cost increases from customers, particularly in periods where there is excess industry capacity. As a result, for some product lines or market segments it may take time to recover raw material price increases. Periodically, firm purchase commitments are entered into which fix the price of a specific commodity that will be delivered at a future time. Forward purchase contracts are used to aid in managing the Company’s natural gas costs. At December 31, 2024, the Company had open forward contracts for the purchase of 0.2 million dekatherms of natural gas at a cost of $0.8 million. Because the Company has agreed to fixed prices for the noted quantity of natural gas, a hypothetical 10 percent fluctuation in the price of natural gas would cause the Company’s actual natural gas cost to be $0.1 million higher or lower than the cost at market price.
37
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The following statements and data are included in this item:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID Number 34) 38
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 47
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of Stepan Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Stepan Company and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 27, 2025, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
38
Contingencies — Maywood — Refer to Note 1 and Note 16 to the Financial Statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company’s Maywood property site may be exposed to liabilities for the remediation of environmental contamination. Environmental loss contingencies are evaluated based on the likelihood of the Company incurring a liability and whether a loss or range of losses is reasonably estimable. The likelihood and amount of a loss or range of losses are estimated based on currently available information and assumptions related to the nature and extent of contamination and the methods and resulting costs of remediation. Past estimates for environmental liabilities are subject to adjustment as new facts emerge during the investigatory and remediation processes. Given the subjectivity of estimating the likelihood of a loss, the range of potential loss, and the amount of liability to recognize associated with the Maywood site, performing audit procedures to evaluate whether the environmental loss contingencies were appropriately recorded and disclosed as of December 31, 2024, required especially challenging, subjective, and complex auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the environmental loss contingencies at the Maywood site included the following, among others:
• We tested the effectiveness of internal controls related to the Company’s development of the estimated environmental loss contingencies, including the assumptions related to the nature and extent of contamination and the methods and resulting costs of remediation.
• We inquired of Company legal counsel and external legal counsel to understand developments in environmental matters.
• We evaluated written responses received from Company legal counsel and external legal counsel as it relates to the environmental loss contingencies.
• We inquired of the Company’s third-party environmental specialists to understand developments in environmental matters.
• We searched data on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency website to identify any additional information relevant to the specific property sites.
• We evaluated whether the assumptions related to the nature and extent of contamination and the methods and resulting costs of remediation used by the Company to determine the estimated losses or ranges of losses were reasonable by comparing those assumptions to decisions rendered by state and Federal environmental regulatory agencies, information provided by feasibility studies and remedial action plans developed. In addition, we tested payments made on the remediation of environmental contamination.
• If the Company’s reasonable estimate of loss for a remediation site is a range, we evaluated whether the amount of the liability recognized by the Company within that range was reasonable based on the facts and circumstances specific to the remediation site.
• We evaluated the Company’s environmental contingencies disclosures for consistency with our knowledge of the Company’s environmental matters.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 27, 2025
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2002.
39
Stepan Company
Consolidated Statements of Income
For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
Operating Expenses:
Goodwill and other intangibles impairment (Note 4) — 2,038 978
Business restructuring and assets impairment (Note 22) — 11,968 308
Other Income (Expense):
Net Income Per Common Share (Note 18):
Shares Used to Compute Net Income Per Common Share (Note 18):
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
40
Stepan Company
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Defined benefit pension plans:
Net defined benefit pension plan activity (Note 19) (5,588 ) (1,329 ) (1,057 )
Cash flow hedges:
Reclassifications to income in period (9 ) (10 ) (9 )
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
41
Stepan Company
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2024 and 2023
Assets
Current Assets:
Property, Plant and Equipment:
Liabilities and Equity
Current Liabilities:
Non-current operating lease liability (Note 7) 57,392 58,026
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 16)
Equity (Note 10):
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
42
Stepan Company
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Goodwill and other intangibles impairment (Note 4) — 2,038 978
Changes in assets and liabilities, excluding effects of acquisitions:
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired (Note 20) — — (9,693 )
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Other debt borrowings (Note 6) — — 75,000
Company stock repurchased — — (24,949 )
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents (30,158 ) (43,927 ) 14,564
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
43
Stepan Company
Consolidated Statements of Equity
For the year ended December 31, 2022
STEPAN COMPANY STOCKHOLDERS
Other comprehensive income (14,276 ) — — — (14,276 ) —
Cash dividends paid:
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
44
Stepan Company
Consolidated Statements of Equity
For the year ended December 31, 2023
STEPAN COMPANY STOCKHOLDERS
Cash dividends paid:
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
45
Stepan Company
Consolidated Statements of Equity
For the year ended December 31, 2024
STEPAN COMPANY STOCKHOLDERS
Other comprehensive income (66,236 ) — — — (66,236 ) —
Cash dividends paid:
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
46
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations
Stepan Company’s (the Company) operations consist predominantly of the production and sale of specialty and intermediate chemicals, which are sold to other manufacturers for use in a variety of end products. Principal markets for all products are manufacturers of cleaning and washing compounds (including detergents, shampoos, fabric softeners, toothpastes and household cleaners), paints, cosmetics, food, beverages, nutritional supplements, agricultural products, plastics, furniture, automotive equipment, insulation and refrigeration.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires Company management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses at the date of the financial statements and to provide disclosures of contingent assets, liabilities and related amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all wholly-owned subsidiaries in which the Company exercises controlling influence. The equity method is used to account for investments in which the Company exercises significant but noncontrolling influence. Intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Business Combinations
The Company makes acquisitions from time to time. When such acquisitions occur, the Company applies the accounting guidance per FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations (ASC 805), to determine whether the acquisition should be treated as an asset acquisition or a business combination. When the acquisition meets the criteria of a business combination the Company recognizes the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values as of the date of the acquisition. The Company recognizes goodwill for any portion of the purchase price that exceeds the sum of the net fair value of all the assets purchased in the acquisition and the liabilities assumed. Considerable estimates, complex judgments and assumptions are typically required to arrive at the fair value of elements acquired in a business combination, inclusive of discount rates, customer attrition rates, royalty rates, economic lives, and estimated future cash flows expected to be generated from the assets acquired. These items are typically most relevant to the fair valuation of identifiable intangible assets and property, plant and equipment.
In some instances, the purchase price allocation of an acquisition is not complete by the end of a reporting period. This situation most typically arises when an acquisition is complex and/or completed very close to the end of a reporting period and all necessary information is not available by the end of the reporting period in which the acquisition occurs. In these instances, the Company reports provisional amounts for any incomplete items and makes subsequent adjustments as necessary information becomes available or determines that additional information is not obtainable. Any subsequent adjustments could have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations as they could impact the initial fair values assigned to intangible assets and property, plant and equipment and/or their estimated economic lives. ASC 805 requires purchase price allocations to be finalized within one year from the acquisition date.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.