Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

RDW US Equity

Redwire CorpIndustrials · Guided Missiles & Space Vehicles & Parts · CIK 1819810 · FY ends Dec 31
$12.02
+0.25 (+2.12%)
USD · as of 2026-08-21 · marketstack

RDW · 10-K · period ended 2025-12-31

← all RDW documents
filed 2026-02-27 · EDGAR original ↗

Our rendering of the filing — original pagination and typography are not reproduced, and tables are reduced to their short label cells (the figures live on FA). Nothing is summarized: every line below is the filing's own text.

blocks 6291,228 of 1,942470k characters rendered

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis is intended to assist in an understanding of our financial condition and results of operations for fiscal 2025 compared with fiscal 2024 items. Discussions of fiscal 2023 items and year-to-year comparisons between fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2023 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 filed with the SEC on March 11, 2025.

The following discussion and analysis is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain information contained in this discussion and analysis includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors. For information identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements, please refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this section to the “Company,” “Redwire,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to Redwire Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Business Overview

Redwire is an integrated space and defense technology company focused on advanced technologies including space infrastructure, autonomous systems and multi-domain operations leveraging digital engineering and artificial intelligence automation. Redwire’s proven and reliable space and defense technology capabilities include our space and defense technology and platform offerings of

Page 42

Table of Contents

avionics, sensors, and payloads; power generation; structures and mechanisms; radio frequency systems; airborne and spacecraft platforms and missions; and microgravity payloads. Redwire combines decades of flight heritage and proven experience with an agile and innovative culture.

Redwire’s primary business model is providing proven, mission critical solutions based on space and defense technology offerings through both short- and long-duration projects for U.S. and international government and commercial customers. Redwire operates in two business segments: Space and Defense Tech. We organize our business segments based on the nature of the products and services offered.

Redwire’s Space segment focuses on delivering next-generation spacecraft, large space infrastructure, and microgravity capabilities to serve civil, national security, and commercial space customers globally. Our core space offerings are flight-proven and have supported hundreds of spacecraft, missions, and operations, including, but not limited to, the International Space Station, the European Space Agency’s (“ESA”) Project for On-Board Autonomy (“PROBA”), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (“NASA”) Double Asteroid Redirection Test and the Orion space capsule, and the Space Force’s GPS. We are also a provider of innovative technologies with the potential to help transform the economics of space and create new markets for its exploration and commercialization.

Redwire’s Defense Tech segment focuses on delivering combat-proven autonomous systems, optical sensors, advanced optics, resilient energy solutions and radio frequency payloads that provide intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities for customers including the U.S. Department of War (“DoW”, formerly known as the Department of Defense), U.S. Federal Civilian Agencies and allied governments across multiple domains. Our defense technology offerings include field-proven airborne products and services that have decades of innovation and more than 400 thousand flight hours. Key operations include developing and manufacturing Uncrewed Aerial Systems (“UAS”) for commercial, government, and military applications in areas such as surveillance, logistics, reconnaissance, border security, and emergency response. Redwire is committed to delivering innovative space and airborne platforms to help transform the future of multi-domain operations.

Recent Developments

Selected operational developments for the year ended December 31, 2025 are described below.

•Strengthened leadership in Very Low Earth Orbit (“VLEO”) with the award of a $44 million phase 2 contract to advance the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s Otter mission, which leverages Redwire’s SabreSat.

•Entered into an eight-figure agreement with The Exploration Company (“TEC”) to provide two International Berthing and Docking Mechanisms (“IBDM”) to support autonomous rendezvous and docking capabilities for TEC’s Nyx spacecraft.

•Launched 14 PIL-BOXes, studying 18 unique molecules, to the International Space Station (“ISS”); as of December 31, 2025, Redwire had eleven active payload facilities on the ISS.

•Completed acquisition of Edge Autonomy, a leading provider of field-proven uncrewed aerial systems (“UAS”) on June 13, 2025.

•Delivered more than 100 Stalker/Penguin UAS to customers in 7 countries around the world subsequent to the Edge Autonomy acquisition, including the U.S. Army (directly and via the Long Range Reconnaissance (“LRR”) program), U.S. Marine Corps, NATO and other allied nations.

•Opened a new 85,000 square foot facility in Ann Arbor, Michigan to increase production of critical fuel cells to meet growing demand, reflecting a key investment in a domestic, vertical integration strategy for Stalker UAS production.

Industry and Regulatory Updates

U.S. Budget Environment

On March 15, 2025, the President signed into law the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act of 2025 (PL 119-4), which extended federal funding (including for the U.S. Department of War (“DoW”), formerly referred to as the Department of Defense) at near fiscal year (“FY”) 2024 levels through September 30, 2025, but included an increase of $6 billion to defense spending, with NASA held approximately flat at FY 2024 budget levels of roughly $24.9 billion. Although the full-year continuing resolution offered budget continuity through September 2025, its flat funding and lack of detail on appropriation levels constrained agencies’ procurement efforts to make new awards.

In May 2025, the FY 2026 President’s budget request (“PBR”) proposed reducing NASA’s funding from approximately $24.9 billion to $18.8 billion. The proposal included cuts to the International Space Station operations, Lunar Gateway, the Mars Sample Return program, retiring SLS/Orion after Artemis IV, and several space science initiatives. As part of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” (“OBBB”) passed in July 2025, Congress included a supplemental appropriations package that restored approximately $10 billion in NASA

Page 43

Table of Contents

funding. The package provided continued funding for the Artemis missions, Lunar Gateway, International Space Station operations, and infrastructure projects at Johnson Space Center, while leaving certain proposed cuts to science programs in place. On January 23, 2026, the President signed into law $24.4 billion in FY 2026 appropriations for NASA.The combination of both the OBBB and the FY 2026 NASA appropriations enacted into law resulted in a significant increase for a total of $27.5 billion for FY 2026 for NASA.Additionally, on December 18, 2025, Jared Isaacman was sworn in as NASA’s 15th administrator.

On December 18, 2025, Congress passed, and the President signed into law, the National Defense Authorization Act of 2026 (“NDAA”, P.L. 119-60), authorizing annual funding levels for the U.S. Armed Forces and setting expenditures for the DoW. The FY 2026 NDAA authorized a total of $900.6 billion for national defense. The bill also authorized funding and updated U.S. national missile defense policy to reflect the goals of the “Golden Dome for America” initiative.

On February 3, 2026, Congress passed, and the President signed into law, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2026, that includes full FY 2026 appropriations for most of the federal government, exclusive of the Department of Homeland Security, which remains under a short-term continuing resolution. The bill provided $839.2 billion in total discretionary defense funding, including research and development funding. The bill includes $13.4 billion in funding for missile defense and space programs to augment and integrate in support of the “Golden Dome for America” initiative.

International Developments

In March 2025, the European Commission introduced the Readiness 2030 package (previously dubbed “ReArm Europe”), to deploy nearly €800 billion over four years for collective defense, including drone systems, missile defense, cyber and autonomous platforms. The package includes a suspension of fiscal constraints allowing up to 1.5% of Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) to be put toward additional defense spending and launched the €150 billion Safe Action for Europe (“SAFE”) loan facility.

The SAFE fund, formally established in May 2025, is a new European Union (“EU”) financial instrument that is expected to increase defense spending among member states through common procurement. It will be financed by EU borrowing, with the European Commission authorized to issue up to €150 billion in loans. This funding is intended to strengthen the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base by facilitating joint investments in defense capabilities. EU contracts under SAFE will require greater than 65% of value tied to member-state supply chains. Since October 2025, Member States have continued to prepare and submit SAFE-related plans and requests, and public reporting indicates demand for SAFE financing has exceeded the initial €150 billion envelope, which could result in additional financing mechanisms or follow-on programs.

At the June 2025 North Atlantic Treaty Organization summit in The Hague, member states committed to raising combined defense and security spending to 5% of GDP by 2035—including a 3.5% core defense floor, and up to 1.5% in broader security or industrial base investment – up from the prior 2% target.

The European Space Agency’s 2025 budget is approximately €7.7 billion, with continued investment in human and robotic missions, Earth observation, navigation, and telecom infrastructure.

The European Commission formally introduced the EU Space Act in June 2025 as a proposed regulation to harmonize legal frameworks across the EU for space activities. It establishes a single market for space service providers and applies to EU and non-EU operators whose activities impact the EU internal market. The regulatory structure will be focused on three areas: safety (including orbital debris mitigation and space situational awareness), resilience (including space-based cybersecurity), and sustainability (including in-orbit servicing). If enacted by the European Parliament and Council, the regulation is designed to apply from January 1, 2030, with a two‐year transition period for existing missions not yet launched by that date. Since October 2025, Council-level work on the proposed EU Space Act has continued, including circulation of updated compromise text. The proposal remains subject to negotiation and may be modified, delayed, or otherwise revised prior to adoption.

In October 2025, the European Commission and European External Action Service announced additional details of the Readiness 2030 package mentioned above with the release of the “Preserving Peace - Defence Readiness Roadmap 2030”, which is a European Union plan to strengthen Europe's defense capabilities by 2030. The roadmap focuses on increasing defense spending and production, joint procurement efforts, and closing capability gaps. The plan enumerates four flagship projects: the European Drone Defence Initiative, the Eastern Flank Watch, the European Air Shield, and the European Space Shield. The roadmap also aims to establish a unified military mobility area by 2027 to allow for swift troop and equipment movement. Specific funding levels will depend on member state commitments and joint investments.

U.S. and international government spending levels and timely funding thereof may adversely affect our financial condition and operating performance over the short and long term. Please refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for additional information related to government funding risks.

Page 44

Table of Contents

Geopolitical Environment

We operate in a complex and evolving global space and defense environment and our business is affected by geopolitical issues. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine significantly elevated global geopolitical tensions and security concerns, and following the acquisition of Edge Autonomy, a portion of the combined company’s sales are to customers in Ukraine. Those sales have been declining and may continue to decline in the event that the war and hostilities in Ukraine end, decline or change, or as a result of changes in international support for military assistance to Ukraine.

Results of Operations

We manage and assess our business based on performance on short- and long-term duration contracts, which involves the design, development and manufacturing of our offerings and related activities with varying delivery schedules. Therefore, the results of operations for a particular year, or year-over-year comparison may not be indicative of future operating results. Substantially all of our contracts in the Space segment and a portion of our contracts in the Defense Tech segment are accounted for under the percentage-of-completion cost-to-cost method. As a result, revenues on contracts are recorded over time based on progress towards completion for a particular contract, including the estimate of the profit to be earned at completion. The following discussion of material changes in consolidated revenues should be read in tandem with the subsequent discussion of changes in consolidated cost of sales because changes in revenues are typically accompanied by a corresponding change in cost of sales due to the nature of the percentage-of-completion cost-to-cost method.

Net EAC Adjustments

We record changes in costs estimated at completion (net EAC adjustments) using the cumulative catch-up method of accounting. Net EAC adjustments can have a significant effect on reported revenues and gross profit and the table below presents the aggregate amounts for the following periods:

Year Ended

The Company evaluates the contract value and cost estimates at completion for performance obligations no less frequently than quarterly, and more frequently when circumstances significantly change. Changes in contract estimates occur for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, changes in contract scope, labor productivity, the nature and technical complexity of the work to be performed, availability and cost volatility of materials, subcontractor and vendor performance, volume assumptions, inflationary trends, and schedule and performance delays. We utilize information available to us at the time when revising our estimates and apply consistent judgment across the full portfolio of programs. The net unfavorable EAC adjustments in 2025 were primarily due to a $25.2 million unfavorable adjustment, including a $12.9 million loss reserve related to a program in the Company’s Defense Tech segment and $14.1 million unfavorable adjustments related to programs in the Space Europe reporting unit as a result of an increase in estimates made for the programmatic and technical assumptions based on the nature and technical complexity of the work to be performed to meet customer specifications. Refer to Note P – Revenues of the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Page 45

Table of Contents

Results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024:

Year Ended $ Change from prior year period % Change from prior year period

Operating expenses:

Loss on extinguishment of debt 996 — — — 996 100

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests — — 4 — (4) (100)

Revenues

Revenues increased by $31.3 million, or 10%, for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. The year-over-year increase in revenues was primarily related to $107.1 million of revenue related to the Edge Autonomy acquisition. This increase was partially offset by $41.1 million of net unfavorable EAC adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to $17.7 million of net unfavorable EAC adjustments for the same period in 2024. Please refer to Note P – Revenues of the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the Company’s net EAC adjustments. The increase is also partially offset due to timing in the stage of production cycles year-over-year for certain larger contracts for power generation offerings in the Space segment. The foregoing resulted in decreased volume of production and therefore decreased revenue compared to the same period in 2024.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales increased $58.5 million, or 23%, for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. The year-over-year increase in cost of sales was primarily driven by $70.1 million of costs related to the Edge Autonomy acquisition, including non-cash expense of $13.6 million related to the purchase accounting fair value adjustment to inventory for the inventory on-hand at the Edge Autonomy acquisition date that was subsequently sold, which is non-recurring. The increase is also due to $13.4 million of increases in contract loss reserves recognized during the year ended December 31, 2025 for which there were nominal comparable amounts in 2024. These increases were partially offset by reduced costs due to a shift in the production cycle associated with certain larger contracts in power generation offerings described above.

Gross Profit and Margin

Gross profit decreased $27.2 million, or 61%, for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. As a percentage of revenues, gross margin was 5% and 15% for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The year-over-year decrease in gross margin as a percentage of revenues was driven by a $54.5 million negative impact of net EAC adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to $17.7 million of net unfavorable EAC adjustments for the same period in 2024. Gross profit and gross margin were also adversely impacted by the non-cash expense of $13.6 million related to the purchase accounting fair value adjustment associated with the Edge Autonomy acquisition as described above. Please refer to Note P – Revenues of the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the Company’s net EAC adjustments.

Page 46

Table of Contents

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses

SG&A expenses increased $99.9 millionfor the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared with the same period in 2024.SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenues also increased to 51% for the year ended December 31, 2025 from 23% during the same period in 2024. The year-over-year increase in SG&A expenses was primarily driven by an increase in share-based compensation of $47.1 million, including $44.4 million related to the Edge Incentive Units, for which there was no comparable cost in 2024. The increase is also due to $48.5 million in SG&A expenses, other than equity-based compensation, related to Edge Autonomy for which there is no comparable cost in 2024. The increase is also partially due to an increase in labor related costs, including severance, intangible amortization and professional fees.

Transaction Expenses

Transaction expenses increased $12.1 million primarily due to costs incurred related to the Edge Autonomy acquisition for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared with the same period in 2024. Please refer to Note C – Business Combinations of the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to acquisitions.

Impairment Expense

The Company recognized impairment expense of $34.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, for which there was no comparable expense in the same period of 2024. During the fourth quarter of 2025, the Company performed its annual quantitative goodwill and long-lived asset impairment tests and recorded a non-cash, pre-tax and post-tax impairment charge of $34.7 million. $2.6 million of this amount related to property, plant and equipment, $10.9 million related to intangible assets, and $20.9 million related to goodwill. Please refer to Note F, Note G, and Note H of the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to impairment.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses increased $13.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared with the same period in 2024 primarily due to $14.9 million of costs related to the Edge Autonomy acquisition.

Interest Expense, net

Interest expense, net increased $26.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily related to $20.0 million of interest expense recognized related to the repayment of the Seller Note (as defined below). The increase is also partially due to interest on the new JPMorgan Credit Agreement entered into during the year ended December 31, 2025, as well as an increase in borrowings on the Adams Street revolving credit facility compared to 2024. Please refer to Note I – Debt of the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the Company’s debt obligations.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt

The Company recognized $1.0 million as a loss on extinguishment of debt related to the write-off of unamortized discount and deferred financing costs associated with the term loans and revolving credit facility under the Adams Street Credit Agreement as a result of the early re-payment on the related loans. Please refer to Note I – Debt of the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the Company’s debt obligations.

Other (Income) Expense, net

Other (income) expense, net decreased by $79.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, from net expense to net income as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. This year-over-year change was primarily due to a gain of $16.1 million recognized as a result of a decrease in the fair value of the Company’s private warrant liability for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to a loss of $52.0 million recognized during the same period in 2024. The change is also due to a decrease in expense of $8.0 million due to a legal settlement recognized during the year ended December 31, 2024 for which there was no comparable activity in the current year. Please refer to Note D – Fair Value of Financial Instruments of the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the Company’s private warrants.

Page 47

Table of Contents

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

The table below provides information regarding our income tax expense (benefit) for the following periods:

Year Ended

(in thousands, except percentages) December 31, 2025 December 31, 2024

Income tax expense (benefit) $ (25,014) $ (2,020)

Effective tax rate (9.9) % (1.7) %

The effective tax rate changed to (9.9)% for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to (1.7)% for the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily related to the Company’s realization of deferred tax assets as a result of the acquisition of Edge Autonomy. Please refer to Note L – Income Taxes of the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

The Company had no net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests for the year ended December 31, 2025 and a de minimis amount for the same period in 2024.

Business Segment Results of Operations

As of December 2025, we operate in two business segments: Space and Defense Tech. We organize our business segments based on the nature of products and services offered and based on the financial information that is provided and regularly reviewed by the CODM in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.

Revenues, gross profit and operating profit of our business segments exclude inter-segment sales, cost of sales and profit as these activities are eliminated in consolidation and thus are not included in management’s evaluation of performance of each segment.

Business segment operating profit excludes a portion of corporate costs not considered allowable or allocable to contracts, and other items not considered part of management’s evaluation of segment operating performance.

Revenues, cost of sales and operating profit for each of our business segments were as follows (in millions):

Revenues

Cost of sales

Operating income (loss)

Unallocated items

Corporate charges mainly consists of corporate overhead costs maintained at the corporate level. These expenses include costs relating to treasury, accounting, consulting, advisory, legal, tax and audit, insurance, financial reporting services and various administrative expenses related to the corporate headquarters.

Space

Redwire’s Space segment focuses on delivering next-generation spacecraft; large space infrastructure; critical avionics, as well as microgravity capabilities to serve civil, national security, and commercial space customers. Space’s operating results included the

Page 48

Table of Contents

following:

Operating margin (23) % 6 % 14 %

Space segment revenues decreased by $45.5 million, or 18%, for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. The year-over-year decrease in revenues was primarily related to $28.1 million of net unfavorable EAC adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to $15.3 million of net unfavorable EAC adjustments for the same period in 2024. The decrease in revenues is also due to timing in the stage of production cycles year-over-year for certain larger contracts related to power generation offerings.

Operating income (loss) decreased by $65.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. Operating margin also decreased from 6% to (23)% year-over-year. The decrease in operating income (loss) and margin is primarily due to the increase in unfavorable EAC adjustments recognized during the year ended December 31, 2025 and $34.4 million of impairment expense recognized related to the Space Europe reporting unit during the year ended December 31, 2025. Please refer to Note F, Note G, and Note H of the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to impairment.

Defense Tech

Redwire’s Defense Tech segment focuses on delivering combat-proven autonomous systems, optical sensors and radio frequency payloads that provide intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities for U.S. and allied nations across multiple domains. Defense Tech’s operating results included the following:

Operating margin (75) % 18 % 18 %

Defense Tech segment revenues increased by $76.8 million, or 157%, for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. The year-over-year increase in revenues was primarily due to $107.1 million of revenue related to the Edge Autonomy acquisition. This increase was partially offset by $12.9 million of net unfavorable EAC adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to $2.4 million of net unfavorable EAC adjustments for the same period in 2024.

Operating income (loss) decreased by $102.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. Operating margin also decreased from 18% to (75)% year-over-year. The decrease in operating income (loss) and operating margin is primarily due to an increase of $44.4 million related to the Edge Incentive Units, a non-cash expense of $13.6 million related to the purchase accounting fair value adjustment to inventory for the inventory on-hand at the Edge Autonomy acquisition date that was subsequently sold, which is non-recurring, and a $20.2 million increase in depreciation and amortization as a result of the Edge Acquisition. The decrease is also partially due to $25.8 million of net unfavorable EAC adjustments, inclusive of a $12.8 million increase in loss reserve recognized during the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to $2.4 million of net unfavorable EACs during the year ended December 31, 2024.

Supplemental Non-GAAP Information

We use Adjusted EBITDA to evaluate our operating performance, generate future operating plans, and make strategic decisions, including those relating to operating expenses and the allocation of internal resources which are not calculated in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and are considered to be Non-GAAP financial performance measures. These Non-GAAP financial performance measures are used to supplement the financial information presented on a U.S. GAAP basis and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the relevant U.S. GAAP measures and should be read in conjunction with information presented on a U.S. GAAP basis. Because not all companies use identical calculations, our presentation of Non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.

Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) adjusted for interest expense, net, income tax expense (benefit), depreciation and amortization, impairment expense, transaction expenses, acquisition integration costs, acquisition earnout costs, purchase accounting fair value adjustment related to deferred revenue and inventory, severance costs, capital market and advisory fees, disposal of long-

Page 49

Table of Contents

lived assets, litigation-related expenses, equity-based compensation, committed equity facility transaction costs, debt financing costs and extinguishment losses, gains on sale of joint ventures, net of costs incurred, and warrant liability change in fair value adjustment.

The table below presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss), computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP for the following periods:

Year Ended

Impairment expense 34,685 — —

Purchase accounting fair value adjustment (ii) 13,645 — 15

Disposal of long-lived assets (v) 647 — —

Committed equity facility transaction costs (viii) — — 259

Debt financing costs and extinguishment losses (ix) 1,101 — 17

Gain on sale of joint ventures, net of costs incurred (x) — (1,255) —

Warrant liability change in fair value adjustment (xi) (16,109) 51,960 2,011

i.Redwire incurred acquisition costs including due diligence, integration costs and additional expenses related to pre-acquisition activity. Acquisition deal costs was reclassified as Transaction expenses to conform with current period presentation.

ii.Redwire adjusted inventory in 2025 related to the application of purchase accounting for the Edge Autonomy acquisition and recognized expense for the amount of the fair value adjustment included in cost of sales for the inventory sold after the acquisition date. During 2023, Redwire recorded adjustments related to the impact of recognizing deferred revenue at fair value as part of the purchase accounting for previous acquisitions.

iii.Redwire incurred severance costs related to separation agreements entered into with former employees.

iv.Redwire incurred capital market and advisory fees related to advisors assisting with transitional activities associated with becoming a public company, such as the implementation of internal controls over financial reporting, and the internalization of corporate services, including, but not limited to, implementing enhanced enterprise resource planning systems.

v.Redwire incurred a loss on the disposal of long-lived assets.

vi.Redwire incurred expenses related to securities litigation and settlements of legal matters. Refer to Note M – Commitments and Contingencies of the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

vii.Redwire incurred expenses related to equity-based compensation under Redwire’s equity-based compensation plan and Edge Incentive Units.

viii.Redwire incurred expenses related to the committed equity facility with B. Riley during 2023, which includes changes in fair value recognized as a gain or loss during the respective periods.

ix.Redwire incurred expenses related to debt financing agreements, including amendment related fees paid to third parties that are expensed in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and losses on debt extinguishments. Refer to Note I – Debt of the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

x.Redwire recognized a gain related to the sale of all its ownership in two joint ventures during 2024, presented net of transaction costs incurred.

xi.Redwire adjusted the private warrant liability to reflect changes in fair value recognized as a gain or loss during the respective

Page 50

Table of Contents

periods.

Key Performance Indicators

The following Key Performance Indicators (“KPIs”) are used by Management to assess the financial performance of the Company, monitor relevant trends and support financial, operational and strategic decision-making. Management frequently monitors and evaluates KPIs against internal targets, core business objectives as well as industry peers and may, on occasion, change the mix or calculation of KPIs to better align with the business, its operating environment, standard industry metrics, or other considerations. If the Company changes the method by which it calculates or presents a KPI, prior period disclosures would be recast to conform to current presentation.

Book-to-Bill

Our book-to-bill ratio was as follows for the periods presented:

Last Twelve Months Ended

Contracts awarded

Revenues

Book-to-bill ratio

Book-to-bill is the ratio of total contracts awarded to revenues recorded in the same period. The contracts awarded balance includes firm contract orders, including time-and-material (“T&M”) contracts, awarded during the period and does not include unexercised contract options or potential orders under indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts. Although the contracts awarded balance reflects firm contract orders, terminations, amendments, or contract cancellations may occur which could result in a reduction to the contracts awarded balance.

We view book-to-bill as an indicator of future revenue growth potential. To drive future revenue growth, our goal is for the level of contracts awarded in a given period to exceed the revenue recorded, thus yielding a book-to-bill ratio greater than 1.0.

Our book-to-bill ratio was 1.32 for the Last Twelve Months (“LTM”) ended December 31, 2025, as compared to 0.76 for the LTM ended December 31, 2024. For the LTM ended December 31, 2025, contracts awarded includes $73.7 million of acquired contract value from the Edge Autonomy acquisition, which was completed in the second quarter of 2025. For the LTM ended December 31, 2024, contracts awarded includes $21.9 million of acquired contract value from the Hera Systems acquisition, which was completed in the third quarter of 2024. For the LTM ended December 31, 2023, none of the contracts awarded balance relates to acquired contract value.

Page 51

Table of Contents

Backlog

The following table presents our contracted backlog as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and related activity for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024:

Organic revenue recognized during the period (228,267) (304,101)

Foreign currency translation 7,987 (1,826)

Acquisition-related contract value, beginning balance — —

Acquisition-related contract value acquired during the period 73,716 —

Acquisition-related additions during the period 110,444 —

Acquisition-related revenue recognized during the period (107,114) —

Foreign currency translation 510 —

Acquisition-related backlog, ending balance 77,556 —

Contracted backlog by segment:

We view growth in backlog as a key measure of our business growth. Contracted backlog represents the estimated dollar value of firm funded executed contracts for which work has not been performed (also known as the remaining performance obligations on a contract). Our contracted backlog includes $81.0 million and $16.7 million in remaining contract value from contracts which recognize revenue at a point in time as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Organic backlog change excludes backlog activity from acquisitions for the first four full quarters since the entities’ acquisition date. Contracted backlog activity for the first four full quarters since the entities’ acquisition date is included in acquisition-related contracted backlog change. After the completion of four fiscal quarters, acquired entities are treated as organic for current and comparable historical periods.

Organic contract value includes the remaining contract value as of January 1 not yet recognized as revenue and additional orders awarded during the period for those entities treated as organic. Acquisition-related contract value includes remaining contract value as of the acquisition date not yet recognized as revenue and additional orders awarded during the period for entities not treated as organic. Organic revenue includes revenue earned during the period presented for those entities treated as organic, while acquisition-related revenue includes the same for all other entities, excluding any pre-acquisition revenue earned during the period. The acquisition-related backlog activity presented in the table above is related to the Edge Autonomy acquisition completed during the second quarter of 2025.

Although contracted backlog reflects business associated with contracts that are considered to be firm, terminations, amendments or contract cancellations may occur, which could result in a reduction in our total backlog. In addition, some of our multi-year contracts are subject to annual funding. Management expects all amounts reflected in contracted backlog to ultimately be fully funded. Contracted backlog from international operations was $193.1 million and $70.5 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. These amounts are subject to foreign exchange rate translations from their respective local currencies to U.S. dollars that could cause the remaining backlog balance to fluctuate with the foreign exchange rate at the time of measurement.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our operations are primarily funded with cash flows provided by operating activities, proceeds from the exercise of warrants and equity offerings, and access to existing credit facilities. As of December 31, 2025, we had $94.5 million in cash and cash equivalents and $35.0 million in available borrowings from our existing credit facilities.

Our primary requirements for liquidity and capital are for the Company’s material cash requirements, including working capital needs, satisfaction of our indebtedness and contractual commitments, investment in expanding our breadth and footprint through acquisitions

Page 52

Table of Contents

as well as investment in facilities, equipment, technologies, and research and development for our growth initiatives and general corporate needs.

Our ability to fund our cash needs is dependent upon the successful execution of our business strategy and future operating results. Our future operating results are subject to, among others, general economic conditions, including as a result of heightened inflation, rising interest rates and supply chain pressures, competitive dynamics in our target markets as well as legislative and regulatory factors that may be outside of our control. As part of our business and debt management strategy, we continuously evaluate opportunities to further strengthen our financial and liquidity position, including issuing additional equity or debt securities, refinancing or otherwise restructuring our existing credit facilities, or entering into new financing arrangements. There can be no assurance that any of these actions will be sufficient to allow us to adequately service our debt obligations, meet our debt covenants, or that such actions will not result in an adverse impact on our business. In the event that we require additional financing, we may not be able to secure such financing on terms acceptable to us or at all. For further information, please refer to Item 1A “Risk Factors” contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We believe our existing sources of liquidity will be sufficient to meet our working capital needs and debt service obligations and to comply with our debt covenants for at least the next twelve months from the date on which our consolidated financial statements were issued.

Indebtedness

Please refer to Note I – Debt of the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the Company’s debt obligations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

From time to time, we are a party to certain off-balance sheet arrangements, such as standby letters of credit. Liabilities related to these arrangements are generally not reflected in our consolidated balance sheets. We do not expect any material impact on our cashflows, results of operations or financial condition to result from these off-balance sheet arrangements.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, we had $0.7 million and $15.4 million of standby letters of credit, respectively. Our standby letters of credit outstanding generally relate to submitted proposals and performance guarantees, which are secured by our restricted cash. Refer to Note B of the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the Company’s restricted cash.

Contractual Obligations

The following table presents our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2025:

Other Financing Loan 662 — — — — — 662

During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company entered into a lease agreement in Huntsville, Alabama, the construction of which is anticipated to be completed during fiscal year 2026. As of December 31, 2025, the lease has not yet commenced but created significant future lease obligations in the amount of $12.3 million. The lease was determined to be an operating lease, whereby the Company is not required to make rent payments prior to the lease commencement dates while construction is being completed on the underlying assets. Due to the nature of the work and the amount of the Company’s contribution to the construction period costs for the lease, the Company has determined it is not the owner of the assets under construction as the landlord has substantially all of the construction period risks.

Page 53

Table of Contents

Cash Flows

The table below summarizes certain information from the consolidated statements of cash flows for the following periods:

Year Ended

Operating activities:

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (177,331) (17,348) 1,231

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (175,071) (7,199) (8,327)

Operating activities

Net cash used in operating activities increased by $160.0 million year-over-year. The change was primarily due to an increase in cash used by working capital of $74.0 million and an increase of $112.2 million in cash used related to the Company’s net loss, partially offset by an increase of $26.2 million in the effects of reconciling adjustments to net income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2025 in comparison to 2024. The increase in cash used by working capital was primarily due to a decrease of $34.0 million in deferred revenue for 2025 compared to an increase of $3.2 million in deferred revenue for 2024 and a decrease in cash provided by accounts receivable and other liabilities of $17.0 million and $3.4 million, respectively, year-over-year. The decreases in other liabilities were primarily a result of timing of payments and recognition of liability. The changes in accounts receivable and deferred revenue were primarily driven by the timing of billable milestones during the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to 2024. The increase in non-cash adjustments is primarily related to increases in depreciation and amortization expense of $20.9 million, share-based compensation of $47.7 million and recognition of the inventory purchase accounting fair value adjustment of $13.6 million, all of which are primarily related to the Edge Autonomy acquisition. These increases were partially offset by a gain recognized on the change in fair value of the outstanding private warrants of $16.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to loss of $52.0 million recognized in 2024 and an increase in the deferred tax benefit of $23.1 million year-over-year. Please refer to Note D – Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Note L – Income Taxes of the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the fair value of warrants and income taxes.

Investing activities

Net cash used in investing activities increased by $167.9 million year-over-year. The change was primarily due to cash used to complete the Edge Autonomy acquisition, and an increase in capital expenditures primarily related to software licensed for internal-use. The increase in cash used in investing activities was also due to proceeds received during the year ended December 31, 2024 related to the sale of joint ventures for which there is no comparable activity in the current period.

Financing activities

Net cash provided by financing activities increased by $353.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to 2024. The change was primarily due to an increase in net proceeds received from the issuance of common stock through the ATM facility, equity offerings, and exercise of the Company’s public and private warrants of $518.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2025, for which there was nominal activity for the same period in 2024. The increase was partially offset by net repayments of debt in the amount of $43.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to net proceeds of $37.1 million in the same period in 2024, and the repurchase of the Company’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of $63.9 million, for which there was no comparable activity for the same period in 2024. The change to net repayments of debt was driven primarily by the repayment of all outstanding principal balances of the term loans and revolving credit facility under the Adams Street Credit Agreement and the repayment of the Seller Note which is partially offset by proceeds from the JPMorgan Credit Agreement. Please refer to Note I – Debt of the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the Company’s debt obligations.

Page 54

Table of Contents

Foreign Currency Exposures

Our operations in Europe conduct transactions that are primarily denominated in euros, which limits our foreign currency exposure. However, changes in exchange rates will affect the Company’s consolidated financial statements as expressed in U.S. dollars.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP, which requires us to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. For the critical accounting estimates used in preparing our consolidated financial statements, we make assumptions and judgments that can have a significant impact on net revenues, cost and expenses, and other (income) expense, net, in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), as well as, on the value of certain assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. We base our assumptions, judgments and estimates on historical experience and various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe the following accounting policies are the most critical to the understanding of our consolidated financial statements and require the use of significant management judgment. For a summary of our significant accounting policies, please refer to Note B – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Goodwill, Intangible and Long-lived Assets

Overview

The Company allocates the purchase price of an acquired business to the underlying tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at acquisition date, with the excess recorded as goodwill. Identifiable finite-lived intangible assets from acquired businesses primarily consist of technology, trademarks, and customer relationships. The accounting for business combinations requires us to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to goodwill, intangible assets, and contingent consideration, which can be affected by contract performance and other factors over time. This may cause final amounts to differ materially from original estimates. Adjustments to the fair value of purchased assets and liabilities after the initial measurement period are recognized in net earnings.

Impairment Testing

The Company assesses goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually for impairment as of October 1st, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate the carrying value may be impaired. Such events or circumstances may include, but are not limited to:

•deterioration in overall economic conditions;

•failure to reach our internal forecasts could impact our ability to achieve our forecasted levels of cash flows;

•adverse technological events that could impact our performance;

•volatility in equity and debt markets resulting in higher discount rates; and

•significant adverse changes in the regulatory environment or markets in which we operate.

Our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are allocated to and tested for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is defined as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment. As of the Company’s annual assessment date, October 1, 2025, the Company had six reporting units, Mission Solutions, Space Components, Engineering Services, Space Europe, Airborne U.S. and Airborne Europe, which were determined based on similar economic characteristics, financial metrics and product and servicing offerings. Effective December 2025, in connection with the change in operating segments, the Company reassessed its reporting units and identified six reporting units, Space Mission Solutions, Space US, Space Europe, Space Defense Tech, North America Defense Tech, and Europe Defense Tech. We may use both qualitative and quantitative approaches when testing goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. In circumstances where a qualitative analysis indicates that the fair value of a reporting unit does not exceed its carrying value, a quantitative analysis is performed using an income approach.

When performing a quantitative analysis, the fair value of the Company’s reporting units are generally determined using a combination of an income approach based on a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) model as well as a market approach based on guideline public company revenues and earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization multiples. Determining the fair value requires the exercise of significant judgments, including the amount and timing of expected future cash flows, long-term growth rates, discount rates and relevant comparable public company earnings multiples and relevant transaction multiples. The cash flows employed in the DCF analysis are based on the Company best estimate of future revenues, gross margins, operating expenses, and

Page 55

Table of Contents

cash flows with consideration for other factors, such as general market conditions, U.S. and foreign government budgets, existing contracted and uncontracted backlog, subcontractor agreements, changes in working capital, long-term business plans and historical operating performance. These estimates and judgments are based upon information available at the time and have been deemed reasonable by management as of the measurement date. The discount rates utilized in the DCF model are based on the respective reporting unit’s weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”), which takes into account the relative weights of debt and equity components within the Company’s existing capital structure and represents the expected cost of new capital, adjusted as appropriate to consider the risk inherent in future cash flows of the respective reporting unit. Actual results could differ from these assumptions.

During 2024 and 2023, the Company performed its annual impairment tests for each of our reporting units and concluded there were no indicators that the fair value was more likely than not below carrying value. Therefore, no quantitative assessment was performed and no goodwill impairment was recognized during 2024 and 2023, respectively.

During 2025, the Company performed a quantitative assessment for its annual impairment test for each of our reporting units and concluded that the fair value for the Space Europe reporting unit was below its carrying value. Therefore, the Company recognized $20.9 million of goodwill impairment during 2025. Please refer to Note H – Goodwill of the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for further information.

Finite-lived intangible assets and long-lived assets are amortized to expense over their estimated useful life on a straight-line basis or over the period the economic benefits of the intangible asset are consumed. The Company evaluates its intangible and long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset or asset group may be impaired. If events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset or asset group may be impaired, the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows of the asset or asset group are compared to the asset or asset group’s carrying value. If the asset or asset group’s carrying value exceed the sum of undiscounted cash flows, the Company records an impairment loss equal to the excess of carrying amount over the estimated fair value of the asset or asset group.

During 2024 and 2023, the Company identified no triggering events and therefore, no impairment assessment was performed on its intangible and long-lived assets. During 2025, the Company identified a triggering event related to the Space Europe reporting unit due to margin erosion and declining cash flows. As such, the Company performed an impairment assessment on the reporting unit’s asset groups and concluded that the undiscounted cash flows were below the carrying value of the asset group and, therefore, recognized $13.5 million of impairment during 2025. Please refer to Note F – Property, Plant and Equipment, net and Note G – Intangible Assets, net of the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for further information regarding impairment recognized for long-lived assets and finite-lived intangible assets, respectively.

Revenue Recognition

The Company engages in short- and long-term contracts, including firm fixed-price (“FFP”), cost-plus fixed fee (“CPFF”) and T&M for production and service activities. Revenue from T&M contracts is recognized based on the number of direct labor hours expended in the performance of a contract multiplied by the contract billing rate. The Company recognizes revenue for performance obligations satisfied at shipment or delivery at a point-in-time and for performance obligations satisfied over time using the cost-to-cost method. Substantially all of the Company’s contracts in the Space segment and a portion of its contracts in the Defense Tech segment relate to contracts for performance obligations that create an asset with no alternative use to the Company and an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date. The portion of the payments retained by the customer or advance payment is not considered a significant financing component because it is used to facilitate inventory demands at the onset of a contract and to safeguard the Company from the failure of the other party to abide by some or all of their obligations under the contract.

Under the cost-to-cost method, revenue is recognized based on the proportion of total costs incurred to total estimated costs-at-completion (“EAC”). An EAC includes all direct costs and indirect costs directly attributable to a program or allocable based on our program cost pooling arrangements. Estimates regarding the Company’s cost associated with the design, manufacture and delivery of products and services are used in determining the EAC.

We prepare EACs for our FFP and CPFF contracts and calculate estimated revenues and costs over the life of our contracts. Accounting for long-term contracts requires significant judgment relative to estimating total contract revenues and costs, in particular, assumptions relative to the amount of time to complete the contract, including the assessment of the nature and complexity of the work to be performed. The Company’s estimates are based upon the professional knowledge and experience of its engineers, program managers and other personnel, who review each long-term contract monthly to assess the contract’s schedule, performance, technical matters and EAC. Factors considered in these estimates include our historical performance, the availability, productivity and cost of labor, the nature and complexity of work to be performed, availability and cost of materials, components and subcontracts, the risk and impact of delayed performance and the level of indirect cost allocations. Changes in estimates are retrospectively applied and when adjustments in estimated contract costs are identified, such revisions may result in current period adjustments to earnings applicable to

Page 56

Table of Contents

performance in prior periods. When total EACs on a contract exceed the total revenue, a provision for the entire loss is determined at the contract level and is recorded in the period in which the loss is evident.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company is a smaller reporting company and is not required to provide the information required under this Item 7A.

Page 57

Table of Contents

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Page

Consolidated Balance Sheets 63

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) 64

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity (Deficit) 65

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 66

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 67

Note A – Description of the Business 67

Note B – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies 67

Note C – Business Combinations 76

Note D – Fair Value of Financial Instruments 78

Note E – Inventory, net 79

Note F – Property, Plant and Equipment, net 80

Note G – Intangible Assets, net 81

Note H – Goodwill 82

Note I – Debt 83

Note J – Leases 85

Note K – Warrants and Capital Stock Transactions 86

Note L – Income Taxes 88

Note M – Commitments and Contingencies 91

Note N – Convertible Preferred Stock 93

Note O – Shareholders’ Equity 94

Note P – Revenues 96

Note Q – Employee Benefit Plans 99

Note R – Equity-Based Compensation 99

Note S – Net Income (Loss) per Common Share 103

Note T – Related Parties 103

Note U – Segment Reporting 104

Note V – Subsequent Events 107

Page 58

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors

Redwire Corporation:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Redwire Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 27, 2026 expressed an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Estimates used to recognize revenue for select long-term contracts

As discussed in Notes B and P to the consolidated financial statements, the Company engages in long-term contracts for production and service activities and recognizes revenue for performance obligations over time, using a cost-to-cost measure of progress for firm fixed-price contracts (“FFP”). Under the cost-to-cost method, revenue is recognized based on the proportion of total costs incurred to total estimated costs-at-completion.

For a select group of FFP contracts, we identified the assessment of the estimated amount of costs to complete the contract, that is an input into the amount of revenue recognized during the period, as a critical audit matter. The estimated amount of costs to complete includes estimated costs such as labor hours, the cost of materials for the work to be performed, and sub-contractor services and materials. The evaluation of these assumptions used to recognize revenue for the select group of long-term contracts requires a high level of subjective auditor judgment due to the nature of the individual contracts and related contract performance risks. Specifically, changes to these assumptions may have had a significant impact on the revenue recorded during the period.

Page 59

Table of Contents

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. Based on the nature of the individual contract, we evaluated certain cost assumptions by:

•comparison of the Company’s historical estimates of costs to actual costs incurred to assess the Company’s ability to estimate accurately

•reading the underlying contract and any related amendments to obtain an understanding of the contractual requirements and related performance obligations

•assessing costs incurred to date and the relative progress toward satisfying the performance obligation(s) of the contract

•assessing, if relevant, the estimated costs at completion by considering similar or predecessor contracts and programs

•inquiring of financial and operational personnel of the Company to identify factors that should be considered within the estimated costs at completion or indications of potential management bias

•inspecting correspondence, if any, between the Company and the customer regarding actual to date and expected performance

•analyzing the sufficiency of the Company’s assessment of contract performance risks included within the estimated costs at completion.

Fair value of intangible assets acquired in a business combination

As discussed in Note C to the consolidated financial statements, on June 13, 2025, the Company closed its acquisition of Redwire Defense Tech Intermediate Holdings, LLC (formerly known as Edge Autonomy Intermediate Holdings, LLC). Pursuant to the merger agreement, the Company acquired 100% of Redwire Defense Tech Intermediate Holdings, LLC equity for total consideration of $160.0 million in cash and the issuance of 49,764,847 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company accounted for the acquisition as a business combination by applying the acquisition method of accounting. Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, resulting in the recognition of intangible assets for developed technology of $264.8 million, customer relationships of $15.4 million, trade name and trademark of $17.9 million and goodwill of $721.3 million. The fair value of the acquired developed technology and trade name and trademark was estimated using the relief from royalty method. The fair value of the acquired customer relationships was estimated using the multi-period excess earnings method.

We identified the assessment of the acquisition-date fair value of the developed technology, customer relationships and trade name and trademark intangible assets as a critical audit matter. The evaluation of certain assumptions used to estimate the fair value of these acquired intangible assets involved a higher degree of subjective auditor judgment and specialized skills and knowledge. Specifically, significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the acquired developed technology and trade name and trademark included the estimate of the amount and timing of expected future revenue, discount rates and expected royalty rates. The significant assumptions used to estimate fair value of acquired customer relationships included amount and timing of expected future revenue and discount rates. Changes to those significant assumptions could have had an impact on the determination of the fair value of the acquired intangible assets.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the Company’s methodology to develop the fair values of the acquired developed technology, customer relationships and trade name and trademark. We performed sensitivity analyses over the Company’s amount and timing of expected future revenue, discount rates, and expected royalty rates to evaluate the impact of changes in those assumptions on the Company’s determination of fair values. We compared the amount and timing of expected future revenue used within the valuation model to the Company’s underlying business strategies and growth plans. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:

•evaluating the Company’s amount and timing of expected future revenue by comparing the projected revenues used within the valuation model to applicable industry forecasted long-term revenue growth rates

•evaluating the Company’s discount rates by comparing them to ranges of discount rates that were independently developed using publicly available market data for comparable companies

•evaluating the Company’s expected royalty rates by comparing them to ranges of royalty rates independently developed using market data for comparable license agreements.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2023.

Houston, Texas

February 27, 2026

Page 60

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors

Redwire Corporation:

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Redwire Corporation and subsidiaries' (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses, described below, on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements operations and comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 27, 2026 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weaknesses discussed below have been identified and included in management’s assessment.

•For substantially all of the U.S. operations, management designed process-level control activities pervasive across the financial reporting processes, but were unable to fully deploy those process-level control activities with sufficient time to demonstrate their operating effectiveness.

•For the European and remaining U.S. operations:

•Due to insufficient time and resources, management did not i) establish effective information technology (IT) general controls (ITGCs), specifically program change controls and access controls, that support the consistent operation of the Company’s IT operating systems, databases and IT applications, and end user computing over all financial reporting; and, ii) have policies and procedures through which ITGCs are deployed across the organization. Automated process-level controls and manual controls dependent upon the accuracy and completeness of information derived from IT systems were also rendered ineffective because they are affected by the lack of ITGCs.

•As a result, management did not effectively design, implement or operate process-level control activities pervasive across the Company’s financial reporting processes.

The material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2025 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report on those consolidated financial statements.

The Company acquired Redwire Defense Tech Intermediate Holdings, LLC (formerly known as Edge Autonomy Intermediate Holdings, LLC) during 2025, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, Redwire Defense Tech Intermediate Holdings, LLC’s internal control over financial reporting associated with 10% of total assets and 32% of total revenues included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Redwire Defense Tech Intermediate Holdings, LLC.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

Page 61

Table of Contents

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas

February 27, 2026

Page 62

Table of Contents

REDWIRE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)

Assets

Current assets:

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash $ 95,183 $ 49,071

Prepaid expenses and other current assets 20,512 9,666

Other non-current assets 118 629

Liabilities, Convertible Preferred Stock and Equity (Deficit)

Current liabilities:

Notes payable to sellers 2,171 —

Short-term debt, including current portion of long-term debt 5,162 1,266

Short-term operating lease liabilities 4,088 4,354

Short-term finance lease liabilities 595 473

Long-term operating lease liabilities 30,471 13,444

Long-term finance lease liabilities 1,276 980

Other non-current liabilities 2,119 428

Commitments and contingencies (Note M – Commitments and Contingencies)

Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit):

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) 10,302 1,339

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Page 63

Table of Contents

REDWIRE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Year Ended

Operating expenses:

Impairment expense 34,685 — —

Loss on extinguishment of debt 996 — —

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests — 4 (1)

Net income (loss) per common share:

Weighted-average shares outstanding:

Comprehensive income (loss):

Foreign currency translation gain (loss), net of tax 8,963 (1,407) 830

Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax 8,963 (1,407) 830

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Page 64

Table of Contents

REDWIRE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (DEFICIT)

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)

Shares Amount Shares Amount

Equity-based compensation expense — — — — 8,658 — — 8,658 — 8,658

Common stock issued for share-based awards 768,151 1 — — — — — 1 — 1

Foreign currency translation, net of tax — — — — — — 827 827 3 830

Foreign currency translation, net of tax — — — — — — (1,400) (1,400) (7) (1,407)

Convertible preferred stock repurchased — — — — — (47,104) — (47,104) — (47,104)

Foreign currency translation, net of tax — — — — — — 8,963 8,963 — 8,963

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Page 65

Table of Contents

REDWIRE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars)

Year Ended

Cash flows from operating activities:

Amortization of debt issuance costs and discount 2,282 857 608

(Gain) loss on sale of joint ventures — (1,303) —

Loss on extinguishment of debt 996 — —

(Gain) loss on change in fair value of committed equity facility — — 255

Deferred provision (benefit) for income taxes (24,901) (1,803) (925)

Impairment expense 34,685 — —

Income from equity method investments — — (245)

Non-cash interest expense — — 525

Purchase accounting fair value adjustment related to inventory 13,645 — —

Changes in assets and liabilities:

(Increase) decrease in contract assets 863 (7,138) (5,442)

(Increase) decrease in inventory (6,652) (734) (44)

(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets (4,386) (1,793) 229

Increase (decrease) in operating lease liabilities (232) (342) (325)

Increase (decrease) in other liabilities 6,344 9,722 (960)

Increase (decrease) in notes payable to sellers — — (557)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (177,331) (17,348) 1,231

Cash flows from investing activities:

Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired (151,791) (881) —

Net proceeds from sale of joint ventures — 4,598 —

Purchases of property, plant and equipment (13,479) (6,399) (5,620)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (175,071) (7,199) (8,327)

Cash flows from financing activities:

Payment of debt issuance fees (105) (780) (163)

Proceeds from (repayment of) third-party advances (7,820) 7,820 —

Payment of equity issuance costs (1,749) — (571)

Payments of issuance costs related to convertible preferred stock — — (52)

Payment of contingent earnout — — (443)

Repurchase of convertible preferred stock (63,863) — —

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Page 66

Table of Contents

REDWIRE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except percentages, unit, share, and warrant amounts)

Note A – Description of the Business

Redwire Corporation (the “Company” or “Redwire”) is an integrated space and defense technology company focused on advanced technologies including aerospace infrastructure, autonomous systems and multi-domain operations, leveraging digital engineering and artificial intelligence automation. The Company develops and provides mission critical solutions based on space and defense technology platform offerings for government, commercial and civil customers through both short- and long-duration projects. These include technologies and production capability for next-generation spacecraft, large space infrastructure, microgravity capabilities, combat-proven autonomous systems, optical sensors and radio frequency payloads that provide intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities for U.S. and allied nations across multiple domains. The Company serves both U.S. and international customers. As described in Note U – Segment Reporting, we operate in two business segments: Space and Defense Tech.

Note B – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and include the accounts of subsidiaries we control and variable interest entities if we are the primary beneficiary. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the reported results of operations.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.

Management has prepared these estimates using the most current and best available information that is considered reasonable under the circumstances. However, actual results could differ materially from those estimates. Significant accounting policies subject to estimates include, but are not limited to, valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, revenue recognition, income taxes, certain equity-based compensation awards, post-retirement benefit plans, paid-in-kind dividends, and warrant liabilities.

Business Combinations

The Company utilizes the acquisition method of accounting for all transactions and events in which it obtains control over one or more other businesses (even if less than 100% ownership is acquired), to recognize the fair value of all assets acquired and liabilities assumed and to establish the acquisition date fair value as of the measurement date.

While the Company uses its best estimates and assumptions as part of the purchase price allocation process to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the business combination date, the estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the business combination date, the Company records adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill. For changes in the valuation of intangible assets between the preliminary and final purchase price allocation, the related amortization is adjusted in the period it occurs. Subsequent to the measurement period, any adjustment to assets acquired or liabilities assumed is included in operating results in the period in which the adjustment is identified. Transaction costs that are incurred in connection with a business combination, other than costs associated with the issuance of debt or equity securities, are expensed as incurred.

Contingent consideration is classified as a liability or as equity on the basis of the definitions of a financial liability and an equity instrument; contingent consideration payable in cash is classified as a liability. The Company recognizes the fair value of any contingent consideration that is transferred to the seller in a business combination on the date at which control of the acquiree is obtained. Contingent consideration payments related to acquisitions are measured at fair value each reporting period using Level 3 unobservable inputs (as defined in the Fair Value of Financial Instruments policy below). When reported, any changes in the fair value of these contingent consideration payments are included in contingent earnout expense on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

Please refer to Note C – Business Combinations for additional information related to the Company’s business combinations.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities, including, but not limited to, contingent consideration, at fair value. A

Page 67

Table of Contents

REDWIRE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except percentages, unit, share, and warrant amounts)

hierarchy of valuation techniques is based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s market assumptions. These two types of inputs have created the following fair-value hierarchy:

Level 1: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollars (“USD”), which is the functional currency of the Company. The local currency of the Company’s foreign operations is considered to be the functional currency of those operations, which is primarily the Euro. Assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries, where the functional currency is the local currency, are translated into USD at exchange rates effective as of the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated using average exchange rates in effect for the periods presented.

Foreign currency translation adjustments are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Realized gains and losses on foreign currency transactions are included in other (income) expense, net on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

Cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, cash balances with banks and similar institutions and all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less. Restricted cash includes cash balances which are restricted as to withdrawal or usage by contractual agreement and consists of cash-collateralized standby letters of credit for performance guarantees and submitted proposals.

The Company had $0.7 million and $15.4 million of restricted cash as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, related to standby letters of credit for performance guarantees and submitted proposals which are legally restricted for withdrawal and use. Amounts may be subject to final price adjustments upon delivery and acceptance of the related performance obligations by the customer. As of December 31, 2024, restricted cash included $7.8 million of proceeds received from third-parties that were refundable except in certain limited circumstances and were also reported as other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the $7.8 million of restricted cash was refunded and the associated liability was relieved.

The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported on the consolidated balance sheets to the consolidated statements of cash flows as of the following periods:

Page 68

Table of Contents

REDWIRE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except percentages, unit, share, and warrant amounts)

The table below presents supplemental cash flow information during the following periods:

Year Ended

Supplemental cash flow information:

Cash paid (received) during the period for:

Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:

Convertible Preferred Stock dividend paid-in-kind $ 47,146 $ 40,699 $ 19,741

Equity consideration in acquisition of businesses 862,561 — —

Settlement of private warrant liabilities for common stock 34,963 — —

Exchange of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock for common stock 90,159 — —

Income taxes paid for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2023 was nominal and for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $0.2 million.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, certificates of deposit, accounts receivable and contract assets. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions of high-credit quality. At times, such amounts may exceed federally insured limits. Cash and cash equivalents on deposit or invested with financial and lending institutions was $94.5 million and $33.7 million, as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

The Company provides credit to customers in the normal course of business. The carrying amount of current accounts receivable and contract assets are stated at cost, net of an allowance for credit losses. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and limits the amount of credit extended when deemed necessary. The Company maintains an allowance for credit losses to provide for the estimated amount of accounts receivable that will not be fully collected. The allowance is based on the assessment of the following factors: customer creditworthiness, historical payment experience, age of outstanding accounts receivable and any applicable collateral. Substantially all accounts receivable as of December 31, 2025 are expected to be collected in 2026. The Company does not believe there is a significant exposure to credit risk as the majority of the Company’s accounts receivable are due from U.S. and foreign governments or large prime contractors of such government entities. As a result, the allowance for credit losses was not material as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Inventory

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is calculated on a first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) basis. Inventory may consist of raw materials, work-in-process, and finished goods. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the estimated costs of completion and selling expense. Inventory is impaired when it is probable that inventory values exceed their net realizable value. Changes in these estimates are included in cost of sales in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are the long-lived, physical assets of the Company, acquired for use in the Company’s normal business operations and not intended for resale by the Company. These assets are recorded at cost. Renewals and betterments that increase the useful lives of the assets are capitalized. The Company occasionally designs and builds its own machinery. The cost of these projects, including direct material and labor, and other indirect costs directly attributable to the construction, are capitalized as construction in progress. No provision for depreciation is made on construction in progress until the related assets are completed and placed in service.

Depreciation is based on the estimated useful lives of the assets using the straight-line method and is included in selling, general and administrative expenses or cost of sales based upon the asset; depreciation and amortization expense includes the amortization of assets under finance leases.

Page 69

Table of Contents

REDWIRE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except percentages, unit, share, and warrant amounts)

Expected useful lives for property, plant and equipment are reviewed at least annually. Estimated useful lives are as follows:

Estimated useful life in years

Computer equipment 3

Furniture and fixtures 7

Laboratory equipment 3-15

Vehicles 5-7

Leasehold improvements shorter of 5 or lease term

Assets subject to finance lease lease term

As assets are retired or sold, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in other (income) expense, net in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

The Company regularly evaluates its property, plant and equipment for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. If the Company determines that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group is not recoverable based upon the undiscounted expected future cash flows of the asset or asset group, the Company records an impairment loss equal to the excess of carrying amount over the estimated fair value of the asset or asset group.

During 2025, the Company identified triggering events and performed impairment assessments on its long-lived asset groups. Please refer to Note F – Property, Plant and Equipment, net for additional information. During 2024 and 2023, the Company identified no triggering events and therefore, no quantitative impairment assessment was performed on its long-lived assets.

Leases

The Company is obligated under certain operating and finance leases for its facilities, vehicles and office equipment. The Company assesses whether an arrangement is a lease or contains a lease at inception of the arrangement. For arrangements considered leases, the Company assesses the lease for finance or operating classification and records a right-of-use (“ROU”) asset and lease liability as of the commencement date. The Company uses the date of initial possession as the lease commencement date, which is generally when the underlying asset becomes available for the Company’s specific use. The Company’s operating leases are included in right-of-use assets, short-term operating lease liabilities and long-term operating lease liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s finance leases consist primarily of vehicles and are included in property, plant and equipment, net, short-term finance lease liabilities and long-term finance lease liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use the underlying asset for the lease term and are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the asset and the lease term. Lease liabilities represent the present value of the Company’s obligations to make payments arising over the lease term. The present value of the lease payments is calculated using the incremental borrowing rate as of the lease commencement date, which reflects the fixed rate the Company would have to pay to borrow an amount equal to the future minimum lease payments over a similar term. Operating lease expense includes the sum of imputed interest expense and the amortization of ROU assets. For finance leases, interest is recognized and presented separately in interest expense, net on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). The lease term includes renewal options which are reasonably certain to be exercised.

Lease and non-lease related components, such as common area maintenance costs, obligations to return the underlying asset to its original condition, or costs to dismantle and remove the underlying asset at the end of the term, are accounted for separately. Certain leasing arrangements contain predetermined fixed escalation of minimum rents and/or require variable payments, such as insurance and tax payments. Variable lease payments which depend on an index or other rate are initially measured using the index or rate at the commencement date and included in the measurement of the ROU asset and lease liability. The subsequent change in lease payments as a result of a change in the index or other rate are recognized as expense in the period in which the payment occurs.

The Company does not have any material restrictions or covenants in its lease agreements, sale leaseback transactions or residual value guarantees. Leases with an initial term of twelve months or less are not recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets and are recognized as lease expense on a straight-line basis in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

During 2025, the Company abandoned a leased property and recorded a nominal amount of impairment expense related to the respective ROU asset. During 2024 and 2023, the Company identified no triggering events and therefore, no quantitative impairment assessment was performed on its right-of-use assets.

Page 70

Table of Contents

REDWIRE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except percentages, unit, share, and warrant amounts)

IntangibleAssets, including Goodwill

The assets and liabilities of acquired businesses are recorded under the acquisition method of accounting at their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition.

Intangible assets include those acquired from the Company’s various business combinations as well as licensed software for internal-use. Licensed software is acquired solely to meet the Company’s internal needs which provides the right to take possession of the software and is hosted on the Company’s specific hardware components, as well as the capitalization of qualifying costs during the application development stage. Indefinite-lived intangible assets include tradenames and in-process research and development (“IPR&D”). Finite-lived intangible assets include customer relationships, technology, trademarks, and internal-use software. Finite-lived intangible assets are reported at cost, net of accumulated amortization, and are either amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or over the period the economic benefits of the intangible assets are consumed. IPR&D is recognized as an indefinite-lived intangible asset until completion or abandonment of the related project, then reclassified as a finite-lived intangible asset and amortized over the remaining useful life.

Acquired intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are not amortized, but are subject to annual impairment testing or more frequently if events or a change in circumstance indicate that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired. This testing compares carrying value to fair value and, when appropriate, the carrying value of these assets is reduced to fair value. The Company performs an impairment test of finite-lived intangibles whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate their carrying value may be impaired, consistent with the methodologies previously disclosed for Property, plant and equipment.

Goodwill is the amount by which the purchase price exceeded the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination on the date of acquisition. The Company’s goodwill has been allocated to and is tested for impairment at a level referred to as the reporting unit. As of its annual assessment date, the Company had six reporting units, Mission Solutions, Space Components, Engineering Services, Space Europe, Airborne U.S and Airborne Europe, which were determined based on similar economic characteristics, financial metrics and product and servicing offerings. Effective December 2025, in connection with the change in operating segments, the Company reassessed its reporting units and identified six reporting units, Space Mission Solutions, Space US, Space Europe, Space Defense Tech, North America Defense Tech, and Europe Defense Tech. As a result, the Company allocated the goodwill balance to each reporting unit and respective reportable operating segments during December 2025. Space Mission Solutions, Space U.S. and Space Europe are within the Space segment and Space Defense Tech, North America Defense Tech, and Europe Defense Tech are within the Defense Tech segment.

The Company tests goodwill for impairment annually as of October 1st or when events and circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. The Company first assesses goodwill for impairment on a qualitative basis to determine if a quantitative assessment is necessary. In circumstances where the qualitative analysis (Step 0) indicates that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit does not exceed its carrying value, the Company would perform a quantitative analysis (Step 1) and the goodwill impairment loss, if any, is measured as the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. In general, the Company performs a quantitative test for most reporting units at least once every three years, or more frequently if deemed necessary by Management. During 2025, the Company performed a quantitative test for all of its reporting units and concluded that the fair value for the Space Europe reporting unit was below its carrying value. Therefore, the Company recognized $20.9 million of goodwill impairment during 2025. Please refer to Note H – Goodwill for further information.

The Company estimates the fair value of each reporting unit using a combination of a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) analysis and market-based valuation methodologies such as comparable public company trading values and values observed in recent business acquisitions. Determining fair value requires the exercise of significant judgments, including the amount and timing of expected future cash flows, long-term growth rates, discount rates and relevant comparable public company earnings multiples and transaction multiples. The cash flows employed in the DCF analysis are based on the Company best estimate of future revenues, gross margins, operating expenses, and cash flows with consideration for other factors, such as general market conditions, U.S. and foreign government budgets, existing contracted and uncontracted backlog, subcontractor agreements, changes in working capital, long-term business plans and historical operating performance. The discount rates utilized in the DCF analysis are based on the respective reporting unit’s weighted average cost of capital, which takes into account the relative weights of debt and equity components within the Company’s existing capital structure and represents the expected cost of new capital, adjusted as appropriate to consider the risk inherent in future cash flows of the respective reporting unit. The carrying value of each reporting unit includes the assets and liabilities employed in its operations, goodwill and allocations of certain assets and liabilities held at the corporate level. The Company compares the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired. If the carrying value of the reporting unit, including goodwill, exceeds

Page 71

Table of Contents

REDWIRE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except percentages, unit, share, and warrant amounts)

its fair value, a goodwill impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

During 2024 and 2023, the Company performed its annual impairment tests and concluded there were no indicators that the fair value of any reporting unit was more likely than not below carrying value. Therefore, no quantitative assessment was performed and no goodwill impairment was recognized during 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company evaluates its convertible instruments, options, warrants and other contracts to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as assets, liabilities, or equity, is reassessed at the end of each reporting period. For equity-linked financial instruments, the Company must determine whether the underlying instrument is indexed to its own common stock in order to classify the derivative instrument as equity. Otherwise, the derivative asset or liability, including embedded derivatives discussed below, is recognized at fair value with subsequent changes in fair value recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

Private Warrants

Classification of the Company’s private warrants is based on management’s analysis of the guidance described above and a statement issued by the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regarding the accounting and reporting considerations for warrants issued by special purpose acquisition companies entitled “Staff Statement on Accounting and Reporting Considerations for Warrants Issued by Special Purpose Acquisition Companies.” The Company determined that the private warrants meet the definition of a derivative and, therefore, are classified as a liability measured at fair value, subject to remeasurement at each reporting period. The Company measures the private warrant liability at fair value each reporting period with the change in fair value recorded as other (income) expense, net in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

Hybrid instruments

Hybrid instruments issued in the form of a share requires bifurcation of embedded features if (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not re-measured at fair value under otherwise applicable generally accepted accounting principles with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument. The nature of the host instrument is therefore evaluated to determine if it is more akin to a debt-like or equity-like host. In this assessment, the Company considers the stated and implied substantive features of the contract as well as the economic characteristics and risks of the hybrid instrument. Each term and feature is then weighed based on the relevant facts and circumstances to determine the nature of the host contract. Terms and features of the hybrid instrument (i.e. embedded derivatives) are then assessed to determine if they must be bifurcated and separately accounted for as freestanding derivatives. Examples of embedded derivatives include, among others, conversion options, redemption features, make-whole provisions, contingent increases in dividend rates and participation rights.

Convertible Preferred Stock

Accounting for convertible instruments and contracts in the Company’s own equity requires an evaluation of the hybrid security to determine if liability classification is required. Liability classification is required for freestanding financial instruments that are not debt in legal form and are: (1) subject to an unconditional obligation requiring the issuer to redeem the instrument by transferring assets (i.e. mandatorily redeemable), (2) instruments other than equity shares that embody an obligation of the issuer to repurchase its equity shares, or (3) certain types of instruments that obligate the issuer to issue a variable number of equity shares. Securities classified in temporary equity are initially measured at the proceeds received, net of issuance costs and excluding the fair value of bifurcated embedded derivatives (if any). Subsequent measurement of the carrying value is not required until such time that the contingencies are resolved and reclassification as a liability is required.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s contracts are subject to revenue recognition using a five-step model, which involves (i) identification of the contract, (ii) identification of performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determination of the transaction price, (iv) allocation of the transaction price to the previously identified performance obligations, and (v) revenue recognition as the performance obligations are satisfied.

During step one of the five-step model, the Company considers whether contracts should be combined or separated, and based on this assessment, the Company combines closely related contracts when all the applicable criteria are met. The combination of two or more

Page 72

Table of Contents

REDWIRE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except percentages, unit, share, and warrant amounts)

contracts requires judgment in determining whether the intent of entering into the contracts was effectively to enter into a single contract, which should be combined to reflect an overall profit rate. Similarly, the Company may separate an arrangement, which may consist of a single contract or group of contracts, with varying rates of profitability, only if the applicable criteria are met. Judgment is involved in determining whether a group of contracts may be combined or separated based on how the arrangement and the related performance criteria were negotiated. The conclusion to combine a group of contracts or separate a contract could change the amount of revenue and gross profit recorded in a given period.

A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when the performance obligation is satisfied. The Company’s contracts with customers generally do not include a right of return relative to delivered products. In certain cases, contracts are modified to account for changes in the contract specifications or requirements. In most instances, contract modifications are accounted for as part of the existing contract. Certain contracts with customers have options for the customer to acquire additional goods or services. In most cases, the pricing of these options are reflective of the standalone selling price of the good or service. These options do not provide the customer with a material right and are accounted for only when the customer exercises the option to purchase the additional goods or services. If the option on the customer contract was not indicative of the standalone selling price of the good or service, the material right would be accounted for as a separate performance obligation.

The Company’s revenues are derived from the design and sales of components for spacecraft and satellites and the performance of engineering, modeling and simulation services related to spacecraft design and mission execution within the Space segment and combat-proven autonomous systems, optical sensors and radio frequency payloads that provide intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities within the Defense Tech segment. Each promised good or service within a contract is accounted for separately, if they are distinct. Promised goods or services not meeting the criteria for being a distinct performance obligation are bundled into a single performance obligation with other goods or services that together meet the criteria for being distinct. The appropriate allocation of the transaction price and recognition of revenue is then applied for the bundled performance obligation. The Company has concluded that its service contracts generally contain a single performance obligation given the interrelated nature of the activities which are significantly customized and not distinct within the context of the contract for substantially all of its contracts in the Space segment and a portion of its contracts in the Defense Tech segment.

Once the Company identifies the performance obligations, it determines the transaction price, which includes estimating the amount of variable consideration to be included in the transaction price, if any. The Company’s contracts generally do not contain penalties, credits, price concessions, or other types of potential variable consideration. Prices are fixed at contract inception and are not contingent on performance or any other criteria.

The Company engages in long-term contracts for production and service activities and recognizes revenue for performance obligations over time primarily in its Space segment. The Company considers the nature of these contracts and the types of products and services provided when determining the proper accounting for a particular contract. These contracts include both firm-fixed-price (“FFP”) and cost reimbursable contracts. The Company’s cost reimbursable contracts typically include cost-plus fixed fee (“CPFF”) and time-and-material (“T&M”) contracts. These long-term contracts involve the design, development, manufacture, or modification of components for spacecraft and satellites. For FFP and CPFF contracts, revenue is recognized over time (versus point in time recognition), as the Company’s performance creates an asset with no alternative use to the Company and the Company has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date, and the customer receives the benefit as the Company builds the asset. For T&M contracts and substantially all of its FFP and CPFF contracts in the Defense Tech segment, the Company recognizes revenue in the amount for which the Company has a right to invoice the customer based on the control transferred to the customer or point-in-time.

For long-term contracts in which revenue is recognized over time, the Company uses the input method, using a cost-to-cost measure of progress. The Company believes that this method represents the most faithful depiction of the Company’s performance because it directly measures value transferred to the customer. Contract estimates are based on various assumptions to project the outcome of future events that may span several years. These assumptions include, but are not limited to, the amount of time to complete the contract, including the assessment of the nature and complexity of the work to be performed; the cost and availability of materials; the availability of subcontractor services and materials; and the availability and timing of funding from the customer. The Company bears the risk of changes in estimates to complete on a fixed-price contract, which may cause profit levels to vary from period to period. For cost reimbursable contracts, the Company is reimbursed periodically for allowable costs and is paid a portion of the fee based on contract progress. In the limited instances where the Company enters into T&M contracts, revenue recognized reflects the number of direct labor hours expended in the performance of a contract multiplied by the contract billing rate, as well as reimbursement of other direct billable costs. For long-term contracts, the Company recognizes anticipated contract losses as soon as they become known and estimable.

Page 73

Table of Contents

REDWIRE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except percentages, unit, share, and warrant amounts)

Accounting for long-term contracts requires significant judgment relative to estimating total contract revenues and costs, in particular, assumptions relative to the amount of time to complete the contract, including the assessment of the nature and complexity of the work to be performed. The Company’s estimates are based upon the professional knowledge and experience of its engineers, program managers and other personnel, who review each long-term contract monthly to assess the contract’s schedule, performance, technical matters and estimated cost at completion. Changes in estimates are applied retrospectively and when adjustments in estimated contract costs are identified, such revisions may result in current period adjustments to earnings applicable to performance in prior periods.

For long-term contracts, the portion of the payments retained by the customer is not considered a significant financing component. At contract inception, the Company also expects that the lag period between the transfer of a promised good or service to a customer and when the customer pays for that good or service will not constitute a significant financing component. Many of the Company’s long-term contracts have milestone payments, which align the payment schedule with the progress towards completion on the performance obligation. On some contracts, the Company may be entitled to receive an advance payment, which is not considered a significant financing component because it is used to facilitate inventory demands at the onset of a contract and to safeguard the Company from the failure of the other party to abide by some or all of their obligations under the contract.

Contract Balances

Contract balances result from the timing of revenue recognized, billings and cash collections, and the generation of contract assets and liabilities. Contract assets are presented as such on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets and represent revenue recognized in excess of amounts invoiced to the customer and the right to payment is not solely subject to the passage of time. Contract liabilities are presented as deferred revenue on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets and relate to advanced payments and billings in excess of revenues recognized and are recognized into revenue as the Company satisfies the underlying performance obligation, either over time as costs are incurred or as control is transferred to the customer.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are recorded for amounts to which the Company is entitled and has invoiced to the customer. The Company had a nominal amount of unbilled receivables as of December 31, 2025 and $3.5 million as of December 31, 2024. Unbilled receivables primarily consist of unbilled amounts under T&M contracts where billing and payment is subject solely to the passage of time.

Remaining Performance Obligations

The Company includes in its computation of remaining performance obligations customer orders for which it has accepted signed sales orders. The definition of remaining performance obligations excludes contracts accounted for under the “right to invoice” practical expedient.

Equity-based Compensation

The Company’s equity-based compensation plans are classified as equity plans and compensation expense is generally recognized over the vesting period of stock awards. The Company issues stock awards in the form of incentive units, non-qualified stock options, time-based restricted stock units, performance-based restricted stock units and eligibility to participate in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”). The fair value of incentive units and stock options are calculated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model (“OPM”). Given the absence of adequate historical data, the Company uses the simplified method to estimate the term of stock options granted to employees. The fair value of the time-based restricted stock units are calculated based on the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. The fair value of the performance-based restricted stock units are valued using a Monte Carlo simulation model on the grant date.

The vesting of the incentive units is contingent on service-based, performance-based, and market conditions and, as such, the recognition of compensation expense is deferred until it is probable the performance conditions will be satisfied. Once it is probable that the performance conditions will be satisfied, unrecognized compensation expense is recognized based on the portion of the requisite service period that has been rendered. If the requisite period is complete, compensation expense is recognized regardless of market conditions being met.

For non-qualified stock options, time-based restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units, the Company recognizes the grant date fair value as compensation expense on a straight-line method over the vesting period (typically three years) and recognizes forfeitures as they occur.

The ESPP authorizes the grant of rights to employee participants to purchase the Company’s common stock through payroll deductions, up to 15% of their eligible compensation. The plan is a compensatory plan as it allows participants to purchase stock equal

Page 74

Table of Contents

REDWIRE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except percentages, unit, share, and warrant amounts)

to 85% of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock at the beginning or end of each offering period, whichever is less (the “Discounted Value”). The ESPP is accounted for as an equity classified award. The Company recognizes the fair value of the ESPP award at the start of the offering period as compensation expense on a straight-line method over the offering period. The fair value of the ESPP award is comprised of the value of Discounted Value and the value associated with the variability in the Company’s common stock price during the offering period, which is estimated using the Black-Scholes model.

Income Taxes

The Company computes its provision for income taxes using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated based on the basis difference for financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. All deferred income taxes are classified as non-current in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The Company records a valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets if, based upon the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company assesses the deferred tax assets for recoverability on a quarterly basis.

The Company recognizes a tax benefit only if it is more likely than not the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such positions are then measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement. The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”). This ASU requires a public business entity (“PBE”) to disclose, on an annual basis, a tabular rate reconciliation using both percentages and currency amounts, broken out into specified categories with certain reconciling items further broken out by nature and jurisdiction to the extent those items exceed a specified threshold. In addition, all entities are required to disclose income taxes paid, net of refunds received disaggregated by federal, state/local, and foreign, as well as by jurisdiction, if the amount is at least 5% of total income tax payments, net of refunds received. For PBEs, the new guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. An entity may apply the amendments in this ASU prospectively by providing the revised disclosures for the period ending December 31, 2025 and continuing to provide the pre-ASU disclosures for the prior periods, or may apply the amendments retrospectively by providing the revised disclosures for all periods presented. The Company adopted this ASU prospectively for the period ending December 31, 2025, which only impacted our disclosures and had no impact on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-06, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40). This ASU removes references to prescriptive and sequential development stages, requiring companies to capitalize internal-use software costs when management commits to funding the software project and it is probable the project will be completed. The ASU will be effective for annual and interim periods beginning January 1, 2028, and can be applied on a prospective, modified prospective, or retrospective basis. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of adoption on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40). This ASU requires disclosure, in the notes to financial statements, of specified information about certain costs and expenses, including purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, and intangible asset amortization included in each relevant expense caption. Additionally, the amendment requires a qualitative description of the amounts remaining in the relevant expense captions that are not separately disaggregated quantitatively, and the disclosure of the total amount of selling expenses and, in annual reporting periods, an entity’s definition of selling expenses. For PBEs, the new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. An entity may apply the amendments prospectively for reporting periods after the effective date or retrospectively to any or all prior periods presented in the financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption, which is expected to have an impact on disclosures only and no impact on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

Other accounting standards updates adopted and/or issued, but not effective until after December 31, 2025, are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and/or cash flows.

Page 75

Table of Contents

REDWIRE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands of U.S. dollars, except percentages, unit, share, and warrant amounts)

Note C – Business Combinations

Edge Autonomy Acquisition

On January 20, 2025, the Company entered into an agreement and plan of merger (as amended on February 3, 2025, and June 9, 2025, the “Merger Agreement”) with Edge Ultimate Holdings, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“Ultimate Holdings”) to acquire 100% of the equity interests in Edge Autonomy Intermediate Holdings, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Edge Autonomy”), a leading provider of field-proven uncrewed airborne system (“UAS”) technology (the “Edge Acquisition”). On June 13, 2025, following the satisfaction of all regulatory approvals, including a stockholder vote, the acquisition was completed. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement Edge Autonomy emerged as the surviving entity and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. On the same day, the merger consideration was transferred, including $160.0 million in cash (“Cash Consideration”) and the issuance of 49,764,847 shares of the Company’s common stock (“Equity Consideration”). Common stock was held back from the Equity Consideration to fund post-closing purchase price adjustments, if any, in the amount of $5.0 million, valued at a price per share of $15.07. The Company funded the Cash Consideration using cash on hand and proceeds from its indebtedness. Refer to Note I – Debt for additional information on the Company’s outstanding debt.

The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination, whereby the excess of the consideration paid over the fair value of identifiable net assets was allocated to goodwill. The goodwill reflects the potential synergies and expansion of the Company’s offerings across product lines and markets complementary to its existing products and markets. For tax purposes, the goodwill is not deductible.

The following table summarizes the fair value of the consideration transferred and the estimated fair values of the major classes of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date.

Fair value of common stock issued(1) 862,561

Equity holdback 5,000

Payable to Seller 2,171

Less: Working capital adjustment 5,000

Assets:

Accounts receivable and other receivable 10,716

Contract assets 69

Prepaid expenses and other current assets 6,614

Property, plant and equipment 26,271

Right-of-use assets 14,822

Liabilities:

Accounts payable 5,627

Other current liabilities 938

Long-term operating lease liabilities 14,973

Deferred tax liabilities 62,193

Other non-current liabilities 1,019

Fair value of net identifiable assets acquired 303,408

(1) Fair value of the common stock issued is based on the Company’s common stock closing price of $19.08 on the acquisition date,

Page 76

Table of Contents

REDWIRE CORPORATION

Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain) · 10-K for the period ended 2025-12-31, filed 2026-02-27 · accession 0001819810-26-000029

Filing HTML rendered to line-structured narrative text by the shipped reducer (datafeeds.edgar_fulltext.visible_text, keep_table_headers=True): scripts and inline-XBRL headers are dropped, and table content is reduced to its short label cells — numeric table data is not rendered and is therefore not counted. The same rendering is used for every year, so a year-over-year comparison is like for like.

The text is our rendering of the filing, not a facsimile: original pagination, typography and tables are not reproduced, and the numbers live in the financial statements (FA).

The outline locates item HEADINGS in this document. Only Items 1A and 7 have certified boundaries elsewhere in the terminal (the redline and the narrative-overlap number); every span here runs from one heading found to the next heading found.

How the outline was chosen. It is the longest chain of item headings that runs forward through both the document and the standard item order: 23 headings are on that chain and 17 further heading-shaped lines are not — the table-of-contents echo of every item, cross-references and exhibit-list mentions. Each entry's length is measured from its heading to the next heading on the chain.