Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

PLMR US Equity

Palomar Holdings, Inc.Financials · Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance · CIK 1761312 · FY ends Dec 31
$130.09
+1.22 (+0.95%)
USD · as of 2026-08-21 · marketstack

PLMR · 10-K · period ended 2025-12-31

← all PLMR documents
filed 2026-02-24 · EDGAR original ↗

Our rendering of the filing — original pagination and typography are not reproduced, and tables are reduced to their short label cells (the figures live on FA). Nothing is summarized: every line below is the filing's own text.

blocks 7411,340 of 2,052410k characters rendered

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion of our historical results of operations and our liquidity and capital resources should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and related notes that appear elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition to historical financial information, this Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements.” You should review the “Special NoteRegarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for factors and uncertainties that may cause our actual future results to be materially different from those in our forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are based on information available to us as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.

Overview

We are a specialty insurance company that provides property and casualty insurance products to individuals and businesses. We leverage underwriting expertise and data-driven analytics to offer innovative solutions in five product categories: Earthquake, Casualty, Inland Marine and Other Property, Crop, and Fronting.

Beginning in 2026, we will reorganize the presentation of our product offerings and report Surety and Credit premium as a separate line. Our Fronting premium will cease to be reported as a separate line of business and the underlying premium will be consolidated into existing lines.

Our Business

We offer coverage in both the admitted and excess and surplus lines (“E&S”) markets, utilizing proprietary data analytics and a technology-enabled platform to support customized underwriting and pricing. Our insurance company subsidiaries, Palomar Specialty Insurance Company (“PSIC”), Palomar Excess and Surplus Insurance Company (“PESIC”), and First Indemnity of America Insurance Co. (“FIA”) carry an “A” financial strength rating from A.M. Best Company (“A.M. Best”), a leading rating agency for the insurance industry.

We distribute our products through multiple channels, including retail agents, program administrators, wholesale brokers, and strategic partnerships with other insurance companies. Our business strategy is supported by a comprehensive risk transfer program with reinsurance coverage which we believe reduces earnings volatility and provides appropriate levels of protection from catastrophic events. Our management team combines decades of insurance industry experience across specialty underwriting, reinsurance, program administration, distribution, claims, and analytics.

Founded in 2014, we have significantly grown our business and have generated attractive returns. We have organically increased gross written premiums from $16.6 million in our first year of operations to $2.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2025, which reflects a compound annual growth rate of approximately 55%. We have also been profitable since 2016, and our net income has increased over that period at a compound annual growth rate of 46%.

We seek to continuously grow our income by developing product offerings for lines of business that harness our core competencies and where we believe we can generate attractive risk adjusted returns. In recent years, we have introduced several new products including Crop, E&S Casualty, Surety and Environmental Liability. These new products diversify our book of business and broaden our product portfolio. We believe that our market opportunity, distinctive products, and differentiated business model position us to grow our business profitably.

Components of Our Results of Operations

Gross Written Premiums

Gross written premiums are the amounts received or to be received for insurance policies written or assumed by us during a specific period of time without reduction for policy acquisition costs, reinsurance costs or other deductions. The volume of our gross written premiums in any given period is generally influenced by:

Volume of new business submissions in existing products or partnerships;

Binding of new business submissions in existing products or partnerships into policies;

Entrance into new partnerships or the offering of new types of insurance products;

Exits from existing partnerships or reducing or ceasing to offer existing insurance products;

46

Table of Contents

Renewal rates of existing policies; and

Average size and premium rate of bound policies.

Our gross written premiums are also impacted when we assume unearned in-force premiums due to new partnerships or other business reasons. In periods where we assume a large volume of unearned premiums, our gross written premiums may increase significantly compared to prior periods and the increase may not be indicative of future trends. The majority of our Crop written premiums are recognized in the third quarter, as we receive the requisite reporting from insureds at that time. This pattern reflects the seasonal nature of the Crop business, which typically results in a disproportionate amount of Crop premiums being recognized in the third quarter. As such, our interim results may not be indicative of full-year performance.

Ceded Written Premiums

Ceded written premiums are the amount of gross written premiums ceded to reinsurers. We enter into reinsurance contracts to limit our exposure to potential losses and to provide additional capacity for growth. We cede premiums through excess of loss (“XOL”) agreements, quota share agreements, and fronting agreements. Ceded written premiums are earned pro-rata over the period of risk covered. The volume of our ceded written premiums is impacted by the amount of our gross written premiums and our decisions to increase or decrease limits or retention levels in our XOL agreements and co-participation levels in our quota share agreements. The volume of ceded written premiums is also impacted by the amount of premium we write under fronting agreements.

Our ceded written premiums can be impacted significantly in certain periods due to changes in quota share agreements. In periods where we modify a quota share agreement, ceded written premiums may increase or decrease significantly compared to prior periods and these fluctuations may not be indicative of future trends. Our XOL costs as a percentage of gross earned premiums also may vary each period due to changes in cost of XOL between contract periods, changes of premium in-force during the XOL contract period, or due to acceleration of XOL charges or the need to purchase additional XOL reinsurance due to losses. In addition, the volume of premiums ceded in fronting agreements each period may vary due to the timing of entering new fronting partnerships and terminations of fronting partnerships.

Net Earned Premiums

Net earned premiums represent the earned portion of our gross written premiums, less the earned portion that is ceded to third-party reinsurers under our reinsurance agreements. The majority of our insurance policies have a term of one year and premiums are earned pro rata over the terms of the policies. Crop premiums are earned ratably over the risk period. The requisite reporting of Crop premiums is primarily received in the third quarter, after the start of the risk period, and earned premium is caught up to cover the period between the start of the risk period and receipt of reporting. Generally, this process results in most of the Crop earned premiums being recognized in the third quarter of each year.

Commission and Other Income

Commission and other income consist of commissions earned on policies written on behalf of third-party insurance companies where we have no exposure to the insured risk and certain fees earned in conjunction with underwriting policies. Commission and other income are earned on the effective date of the underlying policy.

Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses

Losses and loss adjustment expenses represent the costs incurred for losses, net of any losses ceded to reinsurers. These expenses are a function of the size and term of the insurance policies we write and the loss experience associated with the underlying coverage. Certain policies we write subject us to attritional losses such as building fires or casualty claims. In addition, many of the policies we write subject us to catastrophe losses. Catastrophe losses are certain losses resulting from events involving multiple claims and policyholders, including earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, droughts, convective storms, terrorist acts or other aggregating events. Our losses and loss adjustment expenses are generally affected by:

The occurrence, frequency, and severity of catastrophe events in the areas where we underwrite policies relating to these perils;

The occurrence, frequency, and severity of non‐catastrophe attritional losses;

The mix of business written by us;

The reinsurance agreements we have in place at the time of a loss;

47

Table of Contents

The geographic location and characteristics of the policies we underwrite;

Changes in the legal or regulatory environment related to the business we write;

Trends in legal defense costs;

Inflation in housing and construction costs; and

Increases in amounts awarded by courts and juries.

Losses and loss adjustment expenses are based on an actuarial analysis of the estimated losses, including losses incurred during the period and changes in estimates from prior periods. Losses and loss adjustment expenses may be paid out over multiple years.

Acquisition Expenses

Acquisition expenses are principally comprised of the commissions we pay retail agents, program administrators and wholesale brokers, net of ceding commissions and fronting fees we receive on business ceded under quota share and fronting reinsurance agreements. In addition, acquisition expenses include premium‐related taxes and other fees. Acquisition expenses related to each policy we write are deferred and expensed pro rata over the term of the policy. We earn fronting fees consistent with how we earn premiums on the underlying insurance policies, on a pro-rata basis over the terms of the policies.

Other Underwriting Expenses

Other underwriting expenses represent the general and administrative expenses of our insurance operations including employee salaries and benefits, software and technology costs, office rent, stock-based compensation, licenses and fees, and professional services fees such as legal, accounting, and actuarial services.

Interest Expense

Interest expense consists of interest incurred on borrowings from our U.S. Bank credit agreement and FHLB line of credit and the unused line fee and amortization of the commitment fee on our U.S. Bank credit agreement.

Net Investment Income

We earn investment income on our portfolio of invested assets. We invest primarily in investment grade fixed maturity securities, including U.S. government issues, state government issues, mortgage and asset-backed obligations, and corporate bonds with a small portion of our portfolio in equity securities, limited partnerships, and cash and cash equivalents. The principal factors that influence net investment income are the size of our investment portfolio, the yield on that portfolio, and investment management expenses. As measured by amortized cost, which excludes fair value fluctuations from changes in interest rates or other factors, the size of our investment portfolio is mainly a function of our invested capital along with premium we receive from our insureds, less payments on policyholder claims and other operating expenses.

Net Realized and Unrealized Gains and Losses on Investments

Net realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments are a function of the difference between the amount received by us on the sale of a security and the security’s cost-basis, mark-to-market adjustments, credit losses recognized in earnings, unrealized gains and losses on equity securities, and other changes in the fair value of investments. Unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturity securities are recognized as a component of other comprehensive income and do not impact our net income.

Income Tax Expense

Currently our income tax expense consists mainly of federal income taxes imposed on our operations. Our effective tax rates are dependent upon the components of pretax earnings and the related tax effects.

48

Table of Contents

Key Financial and Operating Metrics

We discuss certain key financial and operating metrics, described below, which provide useful information about our business and the operational factors underlying our financial performance.

Underwriting revenue is a non‐GAAP financial measure defined as total revenue, excluding net investment income and net realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments. See “Reconciliation of Non‐GAAP Financial Measures” for a reconciliation of total revenue calculated in accordance with GAAP to underwriting revenue.

Underwriting income is a non‐GAAP financial measure defined as income before income taxes excluding net investment income, net realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments, and interest expense. See “Reconciliation of Non‐GAAP Financial Measures” for a reconciliation of income before income taxes calculated in accordance with GAAP to underwriting income.

Adjusted net income is a non‐GAAP financial measure defined as net income excluding the impact of certain items that may not be indicative of underlying business trends, operating results, or future outlook, net of tax impact. We calculate the tax impact only on adjustments which would be included in calculating our income tax expense using the estimated tax rate at which the company received a deduction for these adjustments. See “Reconciliation of Non‐GAAP Financial Measures” for a reconciliation of net income calculated in accordance with GAAP to adjusted net income.

Annualized return on equity is net income expressed on an annualized basis as a percentage of average beginning and ending stockholders’ equity during the period.

Annualized adjusted return on equity is a non‐GAAP financial measure defined as adjusted net income expressed on an annualized basis as a percentage of average beginning and ending stockholders’ equity during the period. See “Reconciliation of Non‐GAAP Financial Measures” for a reconciliation of return on equity calculated using unadjusted GAAP numbers to adjusted return on equity.

Loss ratio, expressed as a percentage, is the ratio of losses and loss adjustment expenses, to net earned premiums.

Expense ratio, expressed as a percentage, is the ratio of acquisition and other underwriting expenses, net of commission and other income to net earned premiums.

Combined ratio is defined as the sum of the loss ratio and the expense ratio. A combined ratio under 100% generally indicates an underwriting profit. A combined ratio over 100% generally indicates an underwriting loss.

Adjusted combined ratio is a non‐GAAP financial measure defined as the sum of the loss ratio and the expense ratio calculated excluding the impact of certain items that may not be indicative of underlying business trends, operating results, or future outlook. See “Reconciliation of Non‐GAAP Financial Measures” for a reconciliation of combined ratio calculated using unadjusted GAAP numbers to adjusted combined ratio.

Diluted adjusted earnings per share is a non‐GAAP financial measure defined as adjusted net income divided by the weighted-average common shares outstanding for the period, reflecting the dilution which could occur if equity-based awards are converted into common share equivalents as calculated using the treasury stock method. See “Reconciliation of Non‐GAAP Financial Measures” for a reconciliation of diluted earnings per share calculated in accordance with GAAP to diluted adjusted earnings per share.

Catastrophe loss ratio is a non‐GAAP financial measure defined as the ratio of catastrophe losses to net earned premiums. See “Reconciliation of Non‐GAAP Financial Measures” for a reconciliation of loss ratio calculated using unadjusted GAAP numbers to catastrophe loss ratio.

Adjusted combined ratio excluding catastrophe losses is a non‐GAAP financial measure defined as adjusted combined ratio excluding the impact of catastrophe losses. See “Reconciliation of Non‐GAAP Financial Measures” for a reconciliation of combined ratio calculated using unadjusted GAAP numbers to adjusted combined ratio excluding catastrophe losses.

Adjusted underwriting income is a non-GAAP financial measure defined as underwriting income excluding the impact of certain items that may not be indicative of underlying business trends, operating results, or future outlook. See “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for a reconciliation of income before income taxes calculated in accordance with GAAP to adjusted underwriting income.

49

Table of Contents

Tangible stockholders’ equity is a non‐GAAP financial measure defined as stockholders’ equity less intangible assets. See “Reconciliation of Non‐GAAP Financial Measures” for a reconciliation of stockholders’ equity calculated in accordance with GAAP to tangible stockholders’ equity.

Results of Operations

The following table summarizes our results for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:

Year Ended

December 31,

(in thousands, except per share data)

Adjustments:

Key Financial and Operating Metrics

Annualized return on equity 23.6 % 19.6 %

Annualized adjusted return on equity (1) 25.9 % 22.2 %

Adjusted combined ratio (1) 72.7 % 73.7 %

Diluted earnings per share $ 7.17 $ 4.48

Diluted adjusted earnings per share (1) $ 7.86 $ 5.09

Catastrophe loss ratio (1) -0.1 % 5.5 %

Adjusted combined ratio excluding catastrophe losses (1) 72.8 % 68.3 %

(1)

Indicates non-GAAP financial measure; see “Reconciliation of Non‐GAAP Financial Measures” for a reconciliation of the non‐GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

50

Table of Contents

Gross Written Premiums

Gross written premiums increased $486.3 million, or 31.5%, to $2.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to $1.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024. Premium growth was primarily due to an increased volume of policies in the majority of our lines of business, particularly in our Casualty and Crop lines, which was driven by new business generated with existing partners, strong premium retention rates for existing business, expansion of our distribution footprint, and new partnerships, partially offset by a decrease in our Fronting line. The following table summarizes our gross written premiums by line of business and shows each line’s percentage of total gross written premiums for each period:

Year Ended December 31,

($ in thousands)

% of % of %

Amount GWP Amount GWP Change Change

Product

A large fronting partnership terminated in the third quarter of 2024, which primarily caused the decline in fronting premiums shown above.

The following table summarizes our gross written premiums by insurance subsidiary:

Year Ended December 31,

($ in thousands)

% of % of %

Amount GWP Amount GWP Change Change

Subsidiary

Ceded Written Premiums

Ceded written premiums increased $167.1 million, or 18.6%, to $1.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $897.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase in ceded written premium was primarily driven by growth in written premiums subject to quota share arrangements, such as those in Casualty and Crop lines, as well as elevated exposure leading to higher XOL reinsurance expense.

Although our volume of ceded written premiums increased, ceded written premiums as a percentage of gross written premiums decreased to 52.5% for the year ended December 31, 2025 from 58.2% for the year ended December 31, 2024. This percentage decrease was driven by changes in our composition of business whereby premiums written in the current period were subject to lower quota share or XOL cession percentages compared to premiums written in the prior period.

Net Written Premiums

Net written premiums increased $319.2 million, or 49.5%, to $964.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $644.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily due to an increase in gross written premiums, primarily in our Casualty and Crop lines, partially offset by increased ceded written premiums.

51

Table of Contents

Net Earned Premiums

Net earned premiums increased $291.9 million, or 57.2%, to $802.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $510.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 due primarily to the earning of increased gross written premiums offset by the earning of ceded written premiums under reinsurance agreements. The table below shows the amount of premiums we earned on a gross and net basis and net earned premiums as a percentage of gross earned premiums in each period presented:

Year Ended

December 31,

($ in thousands)

Net earned premium ratio 44.9 % 36.5 %

Our net earned premium ratio increased due to changes in our composition of business whereby premiums earned in the current period were subject to lower quota share or XOL cession percentages compared to premiums earned in the prior period, which was partially driven by the aforementioned decrease in fronting premiums.

Commission and Other Income

Commission and other income increased $2.7 million to $5.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The balance increased due to an increase in commissions and policy related fees driven by increased premiums written.

Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses

Losses and loss adjustment expenses increased $93.8 million, or 69.6%, to $228.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $134.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. Losses and loss adjustment expenses consisted of the following elements during the respective periods:

Year Ended

December 31,

($ in thousands)

Catastrophe loss ratio -0.1 % 5.5 %

Non-catastrophe loss ratio 28.6 % 20.9 %

Catastrophe loss activity for the year ended December 31, 2025 was related to favorable development on prior period catastrophe events, offset by flood losses in the third quarter.

Catastrophe loss activity for the year ended December 31, 2024 was primarily related to flood losses in the first quarter, severe convective storms in the second quarter, and Hurricanes Beryl, Debby, and Helene during the third and fourth quarters.

Non-catastrophe losses increased for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024 due mainly to higher attritional losses driven by premium growth on lines of business subject to attritional losses such as Casualty, Crop, and Inland Marine and Other Property.

52

Table of Contents

Acquisition Expenses

Acquisition expenses increased $67.5 million, or 45.1%, to $217.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $149.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily due to higher commissions due to higher gross earned premiums and lower fronting fees due to changes in the composition of our business. Acquisition expenses as a percentage of gross earned premiums were 12.1% for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to 10.7% for the year ended December 31, 2024. Acquisition expenses as a percentage of gross earned premiums increased due to higher commissions as a percentage of gross earned premiums and lower fronting fees as a percentage of gross earned premiums due to changes in the composition of our business.

Other Underwriting Expenses

Other underwriting expenses increased $59.3 million, or 50.7%, to $176.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $117.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily due to the Company incurring higher payroll, technology, and stock-based compensation expenses associated with general growth.

Other underwriting expenses as a percentage of gross earned premiums were 9.9% for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to 8.4% for the year ended December 31, 2024. Excluding the impact of expenses relating to transactions, stock-based compensation, amortization of intangibles, and catastrophe bonds, other underwriting expenses as a percentage of gross earned premiums were 8.0% for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to 6.8% for the year ended December 31, 2024. Other underwriting expenses as a percentage of gross earned premiums fluctuates period over period based on timing of certain expenses relative to premium growth.

Net Investment Income and Net Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Investments

Net investment income increased $20.2 million, or 56.3%, to $56.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $35.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily due to a higher average balance of investments during the year ended December 31, 2025 due primarily to cash generated from operations and the investing of proceeds from our August 2024 secondary offering. In addition, higher yields on invested assets versus the prior year contributed to the increase.

The Company incurred $11.8 million of net realized and unrealized gains on investments for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to $4.6 million of net realized and unrealized gains for the year ended December 31, 2024. In both periods, the balance was primarily driven by unrealized gains on our equity securities. Unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturity securities are recognized as a component of other comprehensive incomeand do not impact our net income. The following table summarizes the components of our investment income for each period presented:

Year Ended

December 31,

($ in thousands)

Investment management fees and expenses (1,028 ) (684 ) (344 ) 50.3 %

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense increased $22.7 million to $56.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $33.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 due to higher pre-tax income for the year ended December 31, 2025. For the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company’s income tax rate of 22.2% for both periods was higher than the statutory rate of 21% due primarily to non-deductible executive compensation expense.

Reconciliation of Non‐GAAP Financial Measures

Underwriting Revenue

We define underwriting revenue as total revenue excluding net investment income and net realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments. Underwriting revenue represents revenue generated by our underwriting operations and allows us to evaluate our underwriting performance without regard to investment results. We use this metric as we believe it gives our management and

53

Table of Contents

other users of our financial information useful insight into our underlying business performance. Underwriting revenue should not be viewed as a substitute for total revenue calculated in accordance with GAAP, and other companies may define underwriting revenue differently.

Total revenue calculated in accordance with GAAP reconciles to underwriting revenue as follows:

Year Ended

December 31,

($ in thousands)

Net realized and unrealized (gains) losses on investments (11,831 ) (4,568 )

Underwriting Income and Adjusted Underwriting Income

We define underwriting income as income before income taxes excluding net investment income, net realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments, and interest expense. Underwriting income represents the pre‐tax profitability of our underwriting operations and allows us to evaluate our underwriting performance without regard to investment results. We use this metric as we believe it gives our management and other users of our financial information useful insight into our underlying business performance. Underwriting income should not be viewed as a substitute for pre‐tax income calculated in accordance with GAAP, and other companies may define underwriting income differently.

We define adjusted underwriting income as underwriting income excluding the impact of certain items that may not be indicative of underlying business trends, operating results, or future outlook. We use this metric as we believe it gives our management and other users of our financial information useful insight into our underlying business performance. Adjusted underwriting income should not be viewed as a substitute for pre‐tax income calculated in accordance with GAAP. Other companies may define adjusted underwriting income differently.

Income before income taxes calculated in accordance with GAAP reconciles to underwriting income and adjusted underwriting income as follows:

Year Ended

December 31,

($ in thousands)

Net realized and unrealized gains on investments (11,831 ) (4,568 )

Expenses associated with transactions 4,644 1,479

Expenses associated with catastrophe bond 2,660 2,483

Adjusted Net Income

We define adjusted net income as net income excluding the impact of certain items that may not be indicative of underlying business trends, operating results, or future outlook, net of tax impact. We calculate the tax impact only on adjustments which would be included in calculating our income tax expense using the estimated tax rate at which the company received a deduction for these adjustments. We use adjusted net income as an internal performance measure in the management of our operations because we believe it gives our management and financial statement users useful insight into our results of operations and our underlying business performance. Adjusted net income does not reflect the overall profitably of our business and should not be viewed as a substitute for net income calculated in accordance with GAAP. Other companies may define adjusted net income differently.

54

Table of Contents

Net income calculated in accordance with GAAP reconciles to adjusted net income as follows:

Year Ended December 31,

($ in thousands)

Adjustments:

Net realized and unrealized (gains) losses on investments (11,831 ) (4,568 )

Expenses associated with transactions 4,644 1,479

Expenses associated with catastrophe bond 2,660 2,483

Adjusted Return on Equity

We define annualized adjusted return on equity as adjusted net income expressed on an annualized basis as a percentage of average beginning and ending stockholders’ equity during the period. We use annualized adjusted return on equity as an internal performance measure in the management of our operations because we believe it gives our management and financial statement users useful insight into our results of operations and our underlying business performance. Annualized adjusted return on equity should not be viewed as a substitute for return on equity calculated using unadjusted GAAP numbers, and other companies may define adjusted return on equity differently.

Annualized adjusted return on equity is calculated as follows:

Year Ended December 31,

($ in thousands)

Adjusted return on equity 25.9 % 22.2 %

Adjusted Combined Ratio

We define adjusted combined ratio as the sum of the loss ratio and the expense ratio calculated excluding the impact of certain items that may not be indicative of underlying business trends, operating results, or future outlook. We use adjusted combined ratio as an internal performance measure in the management of our operations because we believe it gives our management and financial statement users useful insight into our results of operations and our underlying business performance. Adjusted combined ratio should not be viewed as a substitute for combined ratio calculated using unadjusted GAAP numbers, and other companies may define adjusted combined ratio differently.

Adjusted combined ratio is calculated as follows:

Year Ended December 31,

($ in thousands)

Adjustments to numerator:

Expenses associated with transactions (4,644 ) (1,479 )

Stock-based compensation expense (21,014 ) (16,685 )

Amortization of intangibles (4,683 ) (1,558 )

Expenses associated with catastrophe bond (2,660 ) (2,483 )

Adjusted combined ratio 72.7 % 73.7 %

55

Table of Contents

Diluted Adjusted Earnings Per Share

We define diluted adjusted earnings per share as adjusted net income divided by the weighted-average common shares outstanding for the period, reflecting the dilution which could occur if equity-based awards are converted into common share equivalents as calculated using the treasury stock method. We use diluted adjusted earnings per share as an internal performance measure in the management of our operations because we believe it gives our management and financial statement users useful insight into our results of operations and our underlying business performance. Diluted adjusted earnings per share should not be viewed as a substitute for diluted earnings per share calculated in accordance with GAAP, and other companies may define diluted adjusted earnings per share differently.

Diluted adjusted earnings per share is calculated as follows:

Year Ended December 31,

(in thousands except shares and per share data)

Diluted adjusted earnings per share $ 7.86 $ 5.09

Catastrophe Loss Ratio

Catastrophe loss ratio is defined as the ratio of catastrophe losses to net earned premiums. Although we are inherently subject to catastrophe losses, the frequency and severity of catastrophe losses is unpredictable and their impact on our operating results may vary significantly between periods and obscure other trends in our business. Therefore, we are providing this metric because we believe it gives our management and other financial statement users useful insight into our results of operations and trends in our financial performance without the volatility caused by catastrophe losses. Catastrophe loss ratio should not be viewed as a substitute for loss ratio calculated using unadjusted GAAP numbers, and other companies may define catastrophe loss ratio differently.

Loss ratio and catastrophe loss ratio are calculated as follows:

Year Ended December 31,

($ in thousands)

Numerator: Losses and loss adjustment expenses $ 228,594 $ 134,759

Numerator: Catastrophe losses $ (728 ) $ 27,846

Catastrophe loss ratio -0.1 % 5.5 %

Adjusted Combined Ratio Excluding Catastrophe Losses

Adjusted combined ratio excluding catastrophe losses is defined as adjusted combined ratio excluding the impact of catastrophe losses. Although we are inherently subject to catastrophe losses, the frequency and severity of catastrophe losses is unpredictable and their impact on our operating results may vary significantly between periods and obscure other trends in our business. Therefore, we are providing this metric because we believe it gives our management and other financial statement users useful insight into our results of operations and trends in our financial performance without the volatility caused by catastrophe losses. Adjusted combined ratio excluding catastrophe losses should not be viewed as a substitute for combined ratio calculated using unadjusted GAAP numbers, and other companies may define adjusted combined ratio excluding catastrophe losses differently.

56

Table of Contents

Adjusted combined ratio excluding catastrophe losses is calculated as follows:

Year Ended December 31,

($ in thousands)

Adjustments to numerator:

Expenses associated with transactions $ (4,644 ) $ (1,479 )

Stock-based compensation expense (21,014 ) (16,685 )

Amortization of intangibles (4,683 ) (1,558 )

Expenses associated with catastrophe bond (2,660 ) (2,483 )

Adjusted combined ratio excluding catastrophe losses 72.8 % 68.3 %

Tangible Stockholders’ Equity

We define tangible stockholders’ equity as stockholders’ equity less intangible assets. Our definition of tangible stockholders’ equity may not be comparable to that of other companies, and it should not be viewed as a substitute for stockholders’ equity calculated in accordance with GAAP. We use tangible stockholders’ equity internally to evaluate the strength of our balance sheet and to compare returns relative to this measure.

Stockholders’ equity calculated in accordance with GAAP reconciles to tangible stockholders’ equity as follows:

December 31,

($ in thousands)

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources and Uses of Funds

We operate as a holding company with no business operations of our own. Consequently, our ability to pay dividends to stockholders and pay taxes and administrative expenses is largely dependent on dividends or other distributions from our subsidiaries and affiliates, whose ability to pay us is highly regulated.

The Company’s U.S. insurance company subsidiaries, PSIC, PESIC, and FIA, are restricted by the statutes as to the amount of dividends that they may pay without prior approval by state insurance commissioners.

Under California and Oregon statute which govern PSIC, dividends paid in a consecutive twelve month period cannot exceed the greater of (i) 10% of an insurance company’s statutory policyholders’ surplus as of December 31 of the preceding year or (ii) 100% of its statutory net income for the preceding calendar year. Any dividends or distributions in excess of these amounts would require regulatory approval. In addition, under Oregon statute PSIC may only declare a dividend from earned surplus, which does not include contributed capital. Surplus arising from unrealized capital gains or revaluation of assets is not considered part of earned surplus. Based on the above restrictions, PSIC may pay a dividend or distribution of no greater than $176.0 million in 2026 without approval by the California and Oregon Insurance Commissioners. During October 2025, PSIC elected to pay a dividend of $99.0 million to its parent company.

Under Arizona statute which governs PESIC, dividends paid in a consecutive twelve month period cannot exceed the lesser of (i) 10% of an insurance company’s statutory policyholders’ surplus as of December 31 of the preceding year or (ii) 100% of its statutory net income for the preceding calendar year. Based on the above restrictions, PESIC may pay a dividend or distribution of no greater than $7.4 million in 2026 without approval of the Arizona Insurance Commissioner. No dividends were declared or paid during the year ended December 31, 2025.

57

Table of Contents

The Company is subject to New Jersey law, such that all dividend payments require 30-day prior approval of the New Jersey Commissioner of Banking and Insurance (the “Commissioner”). The maximum dividend, which may be paid in any twelve-month period, is limited to the greater of 10% of statutory surplus as of December 31 of the preceding year or the net gain from operations of the preceding calendar year. Cash dividends may only be paid out of surplus derived from realized net profits. Based on these limitations, FIA has capacity to pay a dividend of $1.8 million in 2026, conditional upon the Commissioner’s approval. No dividends were declared or paid during the year ended December 31, 2025.

In addition to the above limitations, any dividend or distribution declared is also subject to state regulatory approval prior to payment. In the future, state insurance regulatory authorities may adopt statutory provisions and dividend limitations more restrictive than those currently in effect.

Insurance companies in the United States are also required by state law to maintain a minimum level of policyholder’s surplus. State insurance regulators have a risk-based capital standard designed to identify property and casualty insurers that may be inadequately capitalized based on inherent risks of the insurer’s assets and liabilities and its mix of net written premium. Insurers falling below a calculated threshold may be subject to varying degrees of regulatory action. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the total adjusted capital of PSIC, PESIC, and FIA were in excess of their respective prescribed risk-based capital requirements.

Under the Insurance Act and related regulations, our Bermuda reinsurance subsidiary, PSRE, is required to maintain certain solvency and liquidity levels, which it maintained as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.

PSRE maintains a Class 3A license and thus must maintain a minimum liquidity ratio in which the value of its relevant assets is not less than 75% of the amount of its relevant liabilities for general business. Relevant assets include cash and cash equivalents, fixed maturity securities, accrued interest income, premiums receivable, losses recoverable from reinsurers, and funds withheld. The relevant liabilities include total general business insurance reserves and total other liabilities, less sundry liabilities. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, we met the minimum liquidity ratio requirement.

Bermuda regulations limit the amount of dividends and return of capital paid by a regulated entity. A Class 3A insurer is prohibited from declaring or paying a dividend if it is in breach of its minimum solvency margin, its enhanced capital requirement, or its minimum liquidity ratio, or if the declaration or payment of such dividend would cause such a breach. If a Class 3A insurer has failed to meet its minimum solvency margin on the last day of any financial year, it will also be prohibited, without the approval of the Bermuda Monetary Authority (“BMA”), from declaring or paying any dividends during the next financial year. Furthermore, the Insurance Act limits the ability of PSRE to pay dividends or make capital distributions by stipulating certain margin and solvency requirements and by requiring approval from the BMA prior to a reduction of 15% or more of a Class 3A insurer’s total statutory capital as reported on its prior year statutory balance sheet. Moreover, an insurer must submit an affidavit to the BMA, sworn by at least two directors and the principal representative in Bermuda of the Class 3A insurer, at least seven days prior to payment of any dividend which would exceed 25% of that insurer’s total statutory capital and surplus as reported on its prior year statutory balance sheet. The affidavit must state that in the opinion of those swearing the declaration of such dividend has not caused the insurer to fail to meet its relevant margins.

Further, under the Companies Act, PSRE may only declare or pay a dividend, or make a distribution out of contributed surplus, if it has no reasonable grounds for believing that: (1) it is, or would after the payment be, unable to pay its liabilities as they become due or (2) the realizable value of its assets would be less than its liabilities.

Pursuant to Bermuda regulations, the maximum amount of dividends and return of capital available to be paid by a reinsurer is determined pursuant to a formula. Under this formula, the maximum amount of dividends and return of capital available from PSRE during 2026 is calculated to be approximately $4.5 million. However, this dividend amount is subject to annual enhanced solvency requirement calculations. There were no dividends declared or paid during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.

One of our insurance company subsidiaries, PSIC, is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (FHLB). Membership allows PSIC access to collateralized advances, which may be used to support and enhance liquidity management. The amount of advances that may be taken is dependent on statutory admitted assets.

Cash Flows

Our primary sources of cash flow are written premiums, investment income, reinsurance recoveries, sales and redemptions of investments, and proceeds from offerings of debt and equity securities. We use our cash flows primarily to pay reinsurance premiums, operating expenses, losses and loss adjustment expenses, and income taxes.

Our cash flows from operations may differ substantially from our net income due to non-cash charges or due to changes in balance sheet accounts.

58

Table of Contents

The timing of our cash flows from operating activities can also vary among periods due to the timing by which payments are made or received. Some of our payments and receipts, including loss settlements and subsequent reinsurance receipts, can be significant. Therefore, their timing can influence cash flows from operating activities in any given period. The potential for a large claim under an insurance or reinsurance contract means that our insurance subsidiaries may need to make substantial payments within relatively short periods of time, which would have a negative impact on our operating cash flows.

We generated positive cash flows from operations for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. Management believes that cash receipts from premium, proceeds from investment sales and redemptions, and investment income and reinsurance recoveries, if necessary, are sufficient to cover cash outflows in the foreseeable future.

The following table summarizes our cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:

Year ended

December 31,

($ in thousands)

Cash provided by (used in):

Change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash $ 26,353 $ 28,687

Our cash flow from operating activities has been positive in each of the last two years. Variations in operating cash flow between periods are primarily driven by variations in our gross and ceded written premiums and the volume and timing of premium receipts, claim payments, reinsurance payments, and reinsurance recoveries on paid losses. In addition, fluctuations in losses and loss adjustment expenses and other insurance operating expenses impact operating cash flow.

Cash used in investing activities for each of the last two years related primarily to purchases of fixed income and equity securities in excess of sales and maturities.

Cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2025 related to $3.8 million in proceeds from stock option exercises, $3.7 million in proceeds from policy holder contributions of surplus and $1.2 million in proceeds from our employee stock purchase plan, offset by share repurchases of $37.3 million. Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2024 related to the receipt of $115.7 million in proceeds from a stock offering, $7.0 million in proceeds from stock option exercises, $2.8 million in proceeds from policy holder contributions of surplus and $0.9 million in proceeds from our employee stock purchase plan, offset by $52.6 million in payments on our FHLB line of credit.

We do not have any current plans for material capital expenditures other than current operating requirements. We believe that we will generate sufficient cash flows from operations to satisfy our liquidity requirements for at least the next 12 months and beyond. The key factor that will affect our future operating cash flows is the frequency and severity of catastrophic loss events. To the extent our future operating cash flows are insufficient to cover our net losses from catastrophic events, we had $1.5 billion in cash and investment securities available at December 31, 2025. We also have the ability to access additional capital through pursuing third-party borrowings including our credit agreements, sales of our equity or debt securities, or entrance into a reinsurance arrangement.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following table illustrates our contractual obligations and commercial commitments by due date as of December 31, 2025:

($ in thousands)

59

Table of Contents

The reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses represents management’s estimate of the ultimate cost of settling losses. As more fully discussed in “—Critical Accounting Policies—Reserve for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses” below, the estimation of the reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses is based on various complex and subjective judgments. Actual losses paid may differ, perhaps significantly, from the reserve estimates reflected in our consolidated financial statements. Similarly, the timing of payment of our estimated losses is not fixed and there may be significant changes in actual payment activity. The assumptions used in estimating the likely payments due by period are based on our historical claims payment experience and industry payment patterns, but due to the inherent uncertainty in the process of estimating the timing of such payments, there is a risk that the amounts paid can be significantly different from the amounts disclosed above.

The amounts in the above table represent our gross estimates of known liabilities as of December 31, 2025 and do not include any allowance for claims for future events within the time period specified. Accordingly, it is highly likely that the total amounts of obligations paid by us in the time periods shown will be greater than those indicated in the table.

Share Repurchases

On July 31, 2025, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing the repurchase of up to $150 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock through July 31, 2027. We also have implemented a share repurchase plan and have used and may use our cash in the future to purchase outstanding shares of our common stock. Under our current share repurchase program, shares may be repurchased from time to time in the open market or negotiated transactions at prevailing market rates, or by other means in accordance with federal securities laws. We repurchased 308,417 shares for $37.3 million under this program during the year ended December 31, 2025 and $112.7 million remains available for future repurchases.

Credit Agreement

In December 2021, we entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with U.S. Bank National Association which provides a revolving credit facility of up to $100 million through December 8, 2026. Interest on the credit facility accrues on each SOFR (as defined in the Credit Agreement) rate loan at the applicable SOFR (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus 1.75% and on each base rate loan at the applicable Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus 0.75%. A loan may be either a SOFR rate loan or a base rate loan, at our discretion. Outstanding amounts under the Credit Agreement may be prepaid in full or in part at any time with no prepayment premium and may be reduced in full or in part at any time upon prior notice. Currently, $5.6 million of the borrowing capacity of the Credit Agreement is pledged as collateral and not able to be utilized.

As of December 31, 2025 we do not have any outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement.

In January 2026, we entered into a new credit agreement that replaced our existing revolving credit facility. The new credit agreement provides for unsecured credit facilities totaling $450 million, comprised of a $150 million revolving facility and a $300 million term loan, each maturing on January 27, 2031.

Borrowings under the new credit agreement bear interest at variable rates based on Term SOFR or an alternate base rate, plus an applicable margin determined by our debt-to-capital ratio. The term loan amortizes quarterly, and borrowings may be prepaid without premium. Obligations under the new credit agreement are guaranteed by certain of our domestic subsidiaries and are unsecured, subject to a negative pledge.

Proceeds from the new credit agreement may be used for general corporate purposes, including permitted acquisitions and the refinancing of existing indebtedness. The new credit agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants, that may limit our operating and financial flexibility.

Our PSIC subsidiary is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (“FHLB”). Membership in the FHLB provides PSIC access to collateralized advances, which can be drawn for general corporate purposes and used to enhance liquidity management. All borrowings are fully secured by a pledge of specific investment securities of PSIC and the borrowing capacity is equal to 10% of PSIC’s statutory admitted assets. All advances have predetermined term and the interest rate varies based on the term of the advance.

As of December 31, 2025, the Company did not have any borrowings outstanding through the FHLB line of credit.

60

Table of Contents

Financial Condition

Stockholders’ Equity

At December 31, 2025 total stockholders’ equity was $942.7 million and tangible stockholders’ equity was $881.6 million, compared to stockholders’ equity of $729.0 million and tangible stockholders’ equity of $715.8 million as of December 31, 2024. Stockholders’ equity increased primarily due to net income we earned for the period and activity related to stock-based compensation. Stock-based compensation expense is treated as an additional paid-in-capital and increases stockholders’ equity.

Tangible stockholders’ equity is a non-GAAP financial measure. See “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for a reconciliation of stockholders’ equity in accordance with GAAP to tangible stockholders’ equity.

Investment Portfolio

Our primary investment objectives are to maintain liquidity, preserve capital and generate a stable level of investment income. We purchase securities that we believe are attractive on a relative value basis and seek to generate returns in excess of predetermined benchmarks. Our Board of Directors approves our investment guidelines in compliance with applicable regulatory restrictions on asset type, quality and concentration. Our current investment guidelines allow us to invest in taxable and tax-exempt fixed maturities, as well as publicly traded mutual funds and common stock of individual companies. Our cash and invested assets consist of cash and cash equivalents, fixed maturity securities, and equity securities. As of December 31, 2025, the majority of our investment portfolio, or $1.2 billion, was comprised of fixed maturity securities that are classified as available-for-sale and carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses on these securities, net of applicable taxes, reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Also included in our investment portfolio were $99.3 million of equity securities, $18.6 million of investments in limited partnerships, and $9.9 million of livestock derivative instruments. In addition, we maintained a non-restricted cash and cash equivalent balance of $106.9 million at December 31, 2025. Our fixed maturity securities, including cash equivalents, had a weighted average effective duration of 3.81 and 4.04 years and an average rating of A1/A+ at December 31, 2025 and 2024. Our fixed income investment portfolio had a book yield of 4.83% as of December 31, 2025, compared to 4.59% as of December 31, 2024.

At December 31, 2025 and 2024 the amortized cost and fair value on available-for-sale securities were as follows:

Amortized Fair % of Total

December 31, 2025 Cost or Cost Value Fair Value

($ in thousands)

Fixed maturities:

U.S. States, Territories, and Political Subdivisions 19,745 18,862 1.5 %

Special revenue excluding mortgage/asset-backed securities 19,280 17,465 1.4 %

Amortized Fair % of Total

December 31, 2024 Cost or Cost Value Fair Value

($ in thousands)

Fixed maturities:

U.S. States, Territories, and Political Subdivisions 10,606 9,778 1.0 %

Special revenue excluding mortgage/asset-backed securities 30,283 26,634 2.8 %

61

Table of Contents

The following tables provide the credit quality of investment securities as of December 31, 2025 and 2024:

Estimated % of

December 31, 2025 Fair Value Total

($ in thousands)

Rating

Estimated % of

December 31, 2024 Fair Value Total

($ in thousands)

Rating

CCC & Below 1 — %

The amortized cost and fair value of our available-for-sale investments in fixed maturity securities summarized by contractual maturity as of December 31, 2025 were as follows:

Amortized Fair % of Total

December 31, 2025 Cost Value Fair Value

($ in thousands)

Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations. See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates- Investment Valuation and Fair Value” for discussion of investment valuation considerations.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We identified the accounting estimates below as critical to the understanding of our financial position and results of operations. Critical accounting estimates are defined as those estimates that are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and which require us to exercise significant judgment. We use significant judgment concerning future results and developments in applying these critical accounting estimates and in preparing our consolidated financial statements. These judgments and estimates affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and the disclosure of material contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ materially from the estimates and assumptions used in preparing the consolidated financial statements. We evaluate our estimates regularly using information that we believe to be relevant. For a detailed

62

Table of Contents

discussion of our accounting policies, see the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Reserve for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses

The reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses represents our estimate of the unpaid portion of the ultimate cost of all reported and unreported losses and loss adjustment expenses as of the balance sheet date. We do not discount this reserve. We seek to establish reserves that will ultimately prove to be adequate.

We categorize our reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses into two types: case reserves and reserves for incurred but not yet reported losses (“IBNR”). Through our third-party administrators (“TPAs”), we generally are notified of losses by our insureds or their agents or brokers. Based on the information provided by the TPAs, we establish initial case reserves by estimating the ultimate losses from the claim, including administrative costs associated with the ultimate settlement of the claim. Our personnel use their knowledge of the specific claim along with internal and external experts, including underwriters and legal counsel, to estimate the expected ultimate losses.

We establish IBNR reserves to provide for (i) the estimated amount of future loss payments on incurred claims not yet reported, and (ii) potential development on reported claims. IBNR reserves are estimated based on generally accepted actuarial reserving techniques that consider quantitative loss experience data and, where appropriate, qualitative factors. We use statistical analysis to estimate the cost of losses and loss adjustment expenses related to IBNR. Those estimates are based on our historical information, industry information and practices, and estimates of trends that may affect the ultimate frequency of incurred but not reported claims and changes in ultimate claims severity.

We regularly review our reserve estimates and adjust them as necessary as experience develops or as new information becomes known to us. Such adjustments are included in current operations. During the loss settlement period, if we have indications that claims frequency or severity exceeds our initial expectations, we generally increase our reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses. Conversely, when claims frequency and severity trends are more favorable than initially anticipated, we generally reduce our reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses once we have sufficient data to confirm the validity of the favorable trends. Even after such adjustments, the ultimate liability may exceed or be less than the revised estimates. Accordingly, the ultimate settlement of losses and the related loss adjustment expenses may vary significantly from the estimate included in our consolidated financial statements.

The following tables summarize our gross and net reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses at December 31, 2025 and 2024.

Gross % of Total Net % of Total

Loss and Loss Adjustment Reserves ($ in thousands)

Gross % of Total Net % of Total

Loss and Loss Adjustment Reserves

The process of estimating the reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses requires a high degree of judgment and is subject to several variables. On a quarterly basis, we perform an analysis of our loss development and select the expected ultimate loss ratio for each of our product lines by exposure period. In our actuarial analysis, we use input from our TPAs and our underwriting departments, including premium pricing assumptions and historical experience. Multiple actuarial methods are used to estimate the reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses. These methods utilize, to varying degrees, the initial expected loss ratio, detailed statistical analysis of past claims reporting and payment patterns, claims frequency and severity, paid and incurred loss experience,

63

Table of Contents

industry loss experience, and changes in market conditions, policy forms, exclusions, and exposures. The actuarial methods used to estimate loss reserves are:

Reported and/or Paid Loss Development Methods—Ultimate losses are estimated based on historical reported and/or paid loss patterns. Reported losses are the sum of paid and case losses. Industry development patterns are substituted for historical development patterns when sufficient historical data is not available.

IBNR-to-Case Reserve Ratio Method—This method calculates ratios of IBNR to case reserves based on incurred and paid development factors from the development methods. Estimated IBNR equals the product of case reserves and the IBNR-to-case reserve ratio. These IBNR amounts are added to the reported-to-date amount to derive ultimate losses.

Reported Bornhuetter-Ferguson Severity Method—Under this method, ultimate losses are estimated as the sum of cumulative reported losses and estimated IBNR losses. IBNR losses are estimated based on expected average severity, estimated ultimate claim counts and the historical development patterns of reported losses.

Reported Bornhuetter Ferguson Pure Premium Method—Under this method, ultimate losses are estimated as the sum of cumulative reported losses and estimated IBNR losses. IBNR losses are estimated based on expected pure premium and on the historical development patterns of reported losses.

The method(s) used vary based on the line of business and the nature of the loss event. Development patterns for catastrophic events are based on the time since event versus an accident quarter and year pattern used for non-catastrophic events. Considering each of the alternative ultimate estimates, we select an estimate of ultimate loss for each line of business.

Loss Adjustment Expense reserves are estimated based on the ratio of paid loss adjustment expense to paid loss, which is estimated separately by line of business as well as split by hurricane and excluding hurricane. We then apply this ratio to our estimated unpaid loss, by multiplying the ratio times 50% of loss case reserves and 100% of loss IBNR reserves. This is applied by line of business and accident year to arrive at estimated unpaid loss adjustment expense on a gross basis. We then add the estimated unpaid loss adjustment expense on a gross basis to the paid loss adjustment expense to calculate estimated ultimate loss adjustment expense.

On a quarterly basis, the leaders of our executive management, accounting, actuarial, and claims teams meet to review the recommendations made by our actuarial team and use their best judgment to determine the best estimate to be recorded for the reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses on our balance sheet.

Our reserves are driven by several important factors, including litigation and regulatory trends, legislative activity, climate change, social and economic patterns and claims inflation assumptions. Our reserve estimates reflect current inflation in legal claims’ settlements and assume we will not be subject to losses from significant new legal liability theories. Our reserve estimates assume that there will not be significant changes in the regulatory and legislative environment. The impact of potential changes in the regulatory or legislative environment is difficult to quantify in the absence of specific, significant new regulation or legislation. In the event of significant new regulation or legislation, we will attempt to quantify its impact on our business, but no assurance can be given that our attempt to quantify such inputs will be accurate or successful.

The table below quantifies the impact of potential reserve deviations from our carried reserve at December 31, 2025. We applied sensitivity factors to incurred losses for the three most recent accident years and to the carried reserve for all prior accident years combined. We believe that potential changes such as these would not have a material impact on our liquidity.

Net Ultimate LLAE December 31, 2025 Potential Impact on 2025

($ in thousands)

* Effective tax rate estimated to be 21%

64

Table of Contents

The amount by which estimated losses differ from those originally reported for a period is known as “development.” Development is unfavorable when the losses ultimately settle for more than the amount reserved or subsequent estimates indicate a basis for reserve increases on unresolved claims. Development is favorable when losses ultimately settle for less than the amount reserved, or subsequent estimates indicate a basis for reducing loss reserves on unresolved claims. We reflect favorable or unfavorable development of loss reserves in the results of operations in the period the estimates are changed.

The following tables present the development of our loss reserves by accident year on a gross basis and net of reinsurance recoveries during each of the below calendar years:

Gross Ultimate Loss and LAE

Calendar Year Development- (Favorable) Unfavorable

($ in thousands)

Net Ultimate Loss and LAE

Calendar Year Development- (Favorable) Unfavorable

($ in thousands)

(1)

This column includes the acquired FIA balances. As the FIA acquisition occurred on January 1, 2025, these balances are excluded from the 2023-2024 development calculations.

During the year ended December 31, 2025, our total gross incurred losses for accident years 2024 and prior developed favorably by $56.8 million. The gross favorable development was due primarily to lower than anticipated severity of attritional losses in our Inland Marine and Other Property line of business. On a net basis, the development was favorable by $19.8 million due to the same reason.

During the year ended December 31, 2024, our total gross incurred losses for accident years 2023 and prior developed favorably by $43.2 million. The gross favorable development was due primarily to lower than anticipated severity of attritional losses in our Inland Marine and Other Property line of business. On a net basis, the development was favorable by $3.0 million due to the same reason.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, our total gross incurred losses for accident years 2022 and prior developed favorably by $35.8 million. The gross favorable development was due primarily to lower than anticipated severity of catastrophe losses, offset by higher than anticipated severity of attritional losses. On a net basis, the development was unfavorable by $2.2 million due to the effect of ceding gross favorable development under our catastrophe XOL reinsurance program and due to unfavorable development on lines of business subject to lower amounts of ceding.

Although we believe that our reserve estimates are reasonable, it is possible that our actual loss experience may not conform to our assumptions. Specifically, our actual ultimate loss ratio could differ from our initial expected loss ratio or our actual reporting and payment patterns could differ from our expected reporting and payment patterns, which are based on our own data and industry data. Accordingly, the ultimate settlement of losses and the related loss adjustment expenses may vary significantly from the estimates

65

Table of Contents

included in our financial statements. We regularly review our estimates and adjust them as necessary as experience develops or as new information becomes known to us. Such adjustments are included in the results of current operations.

Investment Valuation and Fair Value

We invest in a variety of investment grade fixed maturity securities, including U.S. government issues, state government issues, mortgage and asset-backed obligations, and corporate bonds. All of our investments in fixed maturity securities and equity securities are carried at fair value, defined as the price that we would receive upon selling an investment in an orderly transaction to an independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market of the investment. Market participants are assumed to be independent, knowledgeable, able and willing to transact an exchange and not acting under duress.

In our disclosure of the fair value of our investments, we utilize a hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). Adjustments to transaction prices or quoted market prices may be required in illiquid or disorderly markets in order to estimate fair value. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Level 1—Unadjusted quoted prices are available in active markets for identical investments as of the reporting date.

Level 2—Pricing inputs are quoted prices for similar investments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar investments in inactive markets; or valuations based on models where the significant inputs are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3—Pricing inputs into models are unobservable for the investment. The unobservable inputs require significant management judgment or estimation.

We use independent pricing sources to obtain the estimated fair values of investments. The fair value is based on quoted market prices, where available. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, the fair value is based on a variety of valuation techniques depending on the type of investment. The fair values obtained from independent pricing sources are reviewed for reasonableness and any discrepancies are investigated for final valuation.

The fair value of our investments in fixed maturity securities is estimated using relevant inputs, including available market information, benchmark curves, benchmarking of like securities, sector groupings, and matrix pricing. An Option Adjusted Spread model is also used to develop prepayment and interest rate scenarios. These fair value measurements are estimated based on observable, objectively verifiable market information rather than market quotes; therefore, these investments are classified and disclosed in Level 2 of the hierarchy.

The fair value of our investments in equity securities is based on quoted prices available in active markets and classified and disclosed in Level 1 of the hierarchy.

Investment securities are subject to fluctuations in fair value due to changes in issuer-specific circumstances, such as credit rating, and changes in industry-specific circumstances, such as movements in credit spreads based on the market’s perception of industry risks. In addition, fixed maturities are subject to fluctuations in fair value due to changes in interest rates. As a result of these potential fluctuations, it is possible to have significant unrealized gains or losses on a security. Unrealized gains and losses on our fixed maturity securities are included in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of total stockholders’ equity. Equity securities are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included as a component of net income on the Company’s consolidated statement of income.

All financial assets, including available-for-sale securities are required to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected by means of an allowance for credit losses that is included in net income. Credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities are also required to be recorded through a reversible allowance for credit losses, but the allowance is limited to the amount by which fair value is less than amortized cost.

The Company reviews all securities with unrealized losses on a regular basis to assess whether the decline in the securities fair value necessitates the recognition of an allowance for credit losses. Factors considered in the review include the extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost, and current market interest rates and whether the unrealized loss is credit-driven or a result of changes in market interest rates. The Company also considers factors specific to the issuer including the general financial condition of the issuer, the issuers industry and future business prospects, any past failure of issuer to make scheduled interest or principal payments, and the payment structure of the investment and the issuers ability to make contractual payments on the investment.

66

Table of Contents

The Company also considers whether it intends to sell the security or if it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost. When assessing whether it intends to sell a fixed-maturity security or if it is likely to be required to sell a fixed-maturity security before recovery of its amortized cost, the Company evaluates facts and circumstances including, but not limited to, decisions to reposition the investment portfolio, potential sales of investments to meet cash flow needs, and potential sales of investments to capitalize on favorable pricing.

For fixed-maturity securities where a decline in fair value is below the amortized cost basis and the Company intends to sell the security, or it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost, a credit-loss charge is recognized in net income based on the fair value of the security at the time of assessment. For fixed-maturity securities that the Company has the intent and ability to hold, the Company compares the estimated present value of the cash flows expected to be collected to the amortized cost of the security. The extent to which the estimated present value of the cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost of the security represents the credit-related portion of the impairment, which is recognized in net income through an allowance for credit losses. Any remaining decline in fair value represents the noncredit portion of the impairment, which is recognized in other comprehensive income.

The Company reports accrued interest receivable as a component of accrued investment income on its consolidated balance sheet which is presented separately from available-for-sale securities. The Company does not measure an allowance for credit losses on accrued interest receivable and instead would write off accrued interest receivable at the time an issuer defaults or is expected to default on payments.

The Company also invests a small portion of its portfolio in limited partnerships, which are classified as other investments on its consolidated balance sheet. These investments are measured at estimated fair value utilizing a net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient.

Deferred Income Taxes

We account for taxes under the asset and liability method, under which we record deferred income taxes as assets or liabilities on our balance sheet to reflect the net tax effect of the temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured by applying enacted tax rates in effect for the years in which such differences are expected to reverse.

Our deferred tax assets result from temporary differences primarily attributable to unearned premiums, state net operating losses (“NOLs”), loss reserves and deferred compensation. Our deferred tax liabilities result primarily from deferred acquisition costs, internally developed software, and unrealized gains in the investment portfolio.

We recognize deferred tax assets when we determine that such assets are more-likely-than-not to be realized in future periods. In making such a determination, we consider all available evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, tax-planning strategies, projected future taxable income, projected future tax rates, and results of recent operations. On a quarterly basis, we review our deferred tax assets and, if we determine that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, we reduce our deferred tax asset with a valuation allowance. The assessment requires significant judgement and review of all positive and negative evidence to reach a conclusion that it is more likely than not that all or some of portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.

In assessing the need for a deferred tax asset valuation allowance, we are required to make certain judgments and assumptions about our future operations based on historical experience and information regarding reversals of existing temporary differences, carryback capacity, and future taxable income. As of December 31, 2025, we had a net capital deferred tax liability of $3.3 million, compared to a net capital deferred tax asset of $5.3 million as of December 31, 2024.

As of December 31, 2025, we had a valuation allowance of $3.3 million relating to our state net operating loss carryforwards and the remainder of our deferred tax assets did not require a valuation allowance.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See “Note 2—Recent Accounting Pronouncements” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of accounting pronouncements recently adopted and recently issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted and their potential impact to our financial statements.

67

Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements (as defined by applicable regulations of the SEC) that are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of economic losses due to adverse changes in the estimated fair value of a financial instrument as the result of changes in equity prices, interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. Our consolidated balance sheets include assets and liabilities with estimated fair values that are subject to market risk. Our primary market risks have been equity price risk associated with investments in equity securities and interest rate risk associated with investments in fixed maturities. We do not have material exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk or commodity risk.

Credit risk is the potential loss resulting from adverse changes in an issuer’s ability to repay its debt obligations. General concern exists about the number of municipalities experiencing financial difficulties in light of the adverse economic conditions experienced over the past several years. We manage the exposure to credit risk in our municipal bond portfolio by investing in high quality securities and by diversifying our holdings, which are typically either general obligation or revenue bonds related to essential products and services. We manage the exposure to credit risk in our corporate bond portfolio by investing in high quality securities and by diversifying our holdings.

We monitor our investment portfolio to ensure that credit risk does not exceed prudent levels. The majority of our investment portfolio is invested in high credit quality, investment grade fixed maturity securities. We also invest in higher yielding fixed maturities and equity securities. Our fixed maturity portfolio has an average rating by at least one nationally recognized rating organization of “AA−,” with approximately 71.3% rated “A−” or better. At December 31, 2025, 4.4% of our fixed maturity portfolio was unrated or rated below investment grade. Our fixed maturity portfolio includes some securities issued with financial guaranty insurance. We purchase fixed maturities based on our assessment of the credit quality of the underlying assets without regard to insurance.

Interest Rate Risk

We manage our exposure to interest rate risk through a disciplined asset/liability matching and capital management process. In the management of this risk, the characteristics of duration, credit and variability of cash flows are critical elements. We regularly assess these risks and balance them within the context of our liability and capital position.

As of December 31, 2025, the estimated fair value of our fixed maturities was $1.2 billion. We estimate that a 100-basis point increase in interest rates would cause a 3.8% decline in the estimated fair value of our fixed maturities portfolio, while a 100-basis point decrease in interest rates would cause a 3.85% increase in the estimated fair value of that portfolio. The selected scenarios are not predictions of future events, but rather illustrate the effect that such events may have on the fair value of our fixed maturities portfolio.

Equity Price Risk

Equity risk represents the potential economic losses due to adverse changes in equity security prices. As of December 31, 2025, the estimated fair value of our equity securities was $99.3 million. Our equity securities consist primarily of exchange traded funds which seek to track the performance of the broader U.S. stock market. Therefore, the fair value of our equity securities will fluctuate with the value of the overall U.S. stock market and a large decline in the value of the U.S. stock market would cause a corresponding decline in the value of our equity securities.

Inflation

We establish our insurance premiums prior to knowing the amount of losses and loss adjustment expenses or the extent to which inflation may affect such amounts. We attempt to anticipate the potential impact of inflation in our pricing and our establishing of reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses. Inflation in excess of the levels we have assumed could cause losses and loss adjustment expenses to be higher than we anticipated. Inflation assumptions also impact our reinsurance costs and the amount of reinsurance we must purchase to meet certain thresholds and higher inflation assumptions cause our reinsurance costs to increase.

Substantial future increases in inflation could also result in future increases in interest rates, which in turn are likely to result in a decline in the market value of the investment portfolio and cause unrealized losses or reductions in total stockholders’ equity.

68

Table of Contents

Seasonality

Our Inland Marine and Other Property line of business exposes us to claims from seasonal weather events such as hurricanes and windstorms. The occurrence of such events typically increases between June and November of each year. As a result, we may experience increased losses in our Inland Marine and Other Property line of business during this period. We also write and earn the majority of our Crop premiums during the third quarter of each year.

69

Table of Contents

Item 8: Financial Statements

Palomar Holdings,Inc. and Subsidiaries

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 42) 71

Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 74

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 79

Schedule V—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts 114

Schedules other than those listed are omitted for the reason that they are not required, are not applicable or that equivalent information has been included in the financial statements or notes thereto or elsewhere herein.

70

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Palomar Holdings, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Palomar Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Palomar Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on the COSO criteria.

As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of FIA or PCIS, which are included in the 2025 consolidated financial statements of the Company and together constituted 5% and 3% of total and net assets, respectively, as of December 31, 2025 and 3% and 1% of total revenues and net income, respectively, for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of FIA or PCIS.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes and financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a)and our report dated February 24, 2026 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Francisco, California

February 24, 2026

71

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Palomar Holdings, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Palomar Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes and financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated February 24, 2026 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Valuation of Reserve for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses

72

Table of Contents

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016

San Francisco, California

February 24, 2026

73

Table of Contents

Part I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1: Financial Statements

Palomar Holdings,Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except shares and par value data)

December 31, December 31,

Assets

Investments:

Equity method investment — 2,277

Property and equipment, net 2,551 429

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity

Liabilities:

Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities $ 115,663 $ 70,079

Reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses 688,231 503,382

Stockholders’ equity:

Accumulated other comprehensive loss (2,506 ) (26,845 )

See accompanying notes.

74

Table of Contents

Palomar Holdings,Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income

(in thousands, except shares and per share data)

Year Ended December 31,

Revenues:

Net realized and unrealized gains on investments 11,831 4,568 2,941

Expenses:

Other comprehensive income, net:

Per Share Data:

Diluted earnings per share $ 7.17 $ 4.48 $ 3.13

Weighted-average common shares outstanding:

See accompanying notes.

75

Table of Contents

Palomar Holdings,Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(in thousands, except share data)

Number of Accumulated

Common Additional Other Total

Shares Common Paid-In Comprehensive Retained Stockholders’

Outstanding Stock Capital Income (Loss) Earnings Equity

Other comprehensive income, net of tax — — 12,524 — 12,524

Issuance of common stock via employee stock purchase plan 17,080 — 799 — — 799

Issuance of common stock via equity incentive plan 147,341 — 1,237 — — 1,237

Policy holder contribution to surplus — 90 — — 90

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax — — — (2,854 ) — (2,854 )

Issuance of common stock via employee stock purchase plan 17,100 — 902 — — 902

Issuance of common stock via equity incentive plan 359,315 — 6,990 — — 6,990

Policy holder contribution to surplus — — 2,758 — — 2,758

Other comprehensive income, net of tax — — — 24,339 — 24,339

Issuance of common stock via equity incentive plan 287,006 — 3,755 — — 3,755

Policy holder contribution to surplus — — 3,719 — — 3,719

Offering costs (related to prior year offering) — — (141 ) — — (141 )

See accompanying notes

76

Table of Contents

Palomar Holdings,Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

Year Ended December 31,

Operating activities

Loss on asset disposal 31 — —

Net realized and unrealized gains on investments (11,831 ) (4,568 ) (2,941 )

Amortization of premium on fixed maturity securities (61 ) (945 ) (9 )

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Net proceeds from (purchases of) derivative contracts (9,934 ) — —

Investing activities

Purchases of property and equipment (137 ) (243 ) (15 )

Proceeds from sale of property and equipment 346 — —

Purchase of equity method investment — — (3,000 )

Change in securities receivable or payable, net (1,025 ) (1,475 ) 950

Investments in limited partnerships (11,244 ) (5,485 ) —

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired (58,591 ) — (5,534 )

Purchase of policy renewal rights (905 ) (2,487 ) —

Financing activities

Proceeds from common stock issued via employee stock purchase plan 1,165 902 799

Proceeds from common stock issued via stock option exercises 3,755 6,990 1,237

Policy holder contribution to surplus 3,719 2,758 90

Proceeds from stock offering, net of offering costs (141 ) 115,724 —

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (28,786 ) 73,774 (3,940 )

Supplementary cash flow information:

Cash paid for state income taxes $ 1,124 $ 644 $ 484

77

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash within the consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):

December 31, December 31,

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash $ 106,892 $ 80,539

See accompanying notes.

78

Table of Contents

Palomar Holdings,Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notesto Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Summary of Operations and Basis of Presentation

Summary of Operations

Palomar Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) is a Delaware incorporated insurance holding company that was founded in 2014. The Company has several wholly owned subsidiaries including an Oregon domiciled insurance company, Palomar Specialty Insurance Company (“PSIC”), a Bermuda based reinsurance company, Palomar Specialty Reinsurance Company Bermuda Ltd. (“PSRE”), an Arizona domiciled surplus lines insurance company, Palomar Excess and Surplus Insurance Company (“PESIC”), a California domiciled property and casualty insurance agency, Palomar Insurance Agency, DBA Palomar General Insurance Agency (“PGIA”), and a Delaware incorporated management company, Palomar Underwriters Exchange Organization, Inc. (“PUEO”), that provides services to a Hawaii domiciled reciprocal exchange, Laulima Exchange (“Laulima”), as its attorney-in-fact, a New Jersey domiciled insurance carrier specializing in surety bonds, First Indemnity of America Insurance Co. (“FIA”), and a Delaware-incorporated insurance management company, Palomar Crop Insurance Services, Inc. (“PCIS”).

PSIC is a property and casualty insurance company domiciled in the state of Oregon. PSIC is licensed to underwrite insurance on an admitted basis in 50 states in the United States, as of December 31, 2025, mainly through managing general insurance agencies, wholesale brokers, and independent agents.

PSRE is a Bermuda captive reinsurance company that has historically been used to reinsure certain premiums on a quota share basis exclusively for PSIC.

PESIC is an Arizona domiciled surplus lines insurance company. PESIC is licensed in Arizona to write surplus lines policies across all the Company’s lines of business and was formed and began writing policies in 2020.

PGIA is a property and casualty general insurance agency for PSIC, PESIC, and unaffiliated insurance carriers. As a general insurance agency, PGIA assists in developing insurance products, underwriting insurance policies, and receiving and disbursing funds from premium and loss transactions under contracts on behalf of insurance companies. PGIA earns commissions from the product development, marketing, and servicing of the insurance companies’ programs. PGIA also earns fee income from policyholder transactions.

PUEO is a Delaware corporation that was formed in 2023 and provides management services to Laulima Exchange (“Laulima”), a Hawaii domiciled reciprocal exchange, as its attorney-in-fact. Laulima was formed in 2023 and is comprised of an unincorporated association of Hawaii homeowners (“subscribers”) that agree to insure one another.

FIA is a New Jersey-domiciled insurance carrier specializing in surety bonds. FIA was founded in 1979 and provides surety bond products across multiple states.

PCIS is a Delaware-incorporated insurance management company. PCIS provides management and related services supporting insurance products for American farmers.

The Company operates as an insurance holding company system and is subject to the insurance holding company laws of the States of Oregon, Arizona, and New Jersey, the states in which PSIC, PESIC, and FIA are domiciled. The Company is also commercially domiciled in California, making it subject to California insurance holding company laws. These statutes require that each insurance company in the system register with the insurance department of its state of domicile and furnish information concerning the operations of companies within the holding company system that may materially affect the operations, management or financial condition of the insurers within the system and domiciled in that state.

Segment Reporting

The Company has a single operating segment, the property and casualty insurance business. The Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) is the Chief Executive Officer. The CODM reviews the Company’s consolidated net income as reported under GAAP, which is the primary measure of segment profit or loss. The CODM also reviews the individual measures and significant segment expenses that contribute to net income including gross written premiums, net earned premiums, losses and loss adjustment expenses, acquisition and underwriting expenses, and net investment income. The CODM reviews these measures, comparing them to prior periods and forecasted expectations, and makes resource allocation decisions based on the analysis. The significant segment expenses provided to the CODM are consistent with the categories shown in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income and there are no other segment items used by the CODM. While the Company’s

79

Table of Contents

CODM also reviews the revenue streams attributable to individual products, operations are managed, resources are allocated, and financial performance is evaluated on a consolidated basis.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements also include the accounts of Laulima, as Laulima is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Such estimates and assumptions could change in the future as more information becomes known, which could impact the amounts reported and disclosed herein. All revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised. Significant estimates reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses, reinsurance recoverables on unpaid losses, and the fair values of investments.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include time deposits and marketable securities with original maturities of three months or less at acquisition and are stated at cost, which approximates fair value. The Company maintains cash balances in federally insured financial institutions.

Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain) · 10-K for the period ended 2025-12-31, filed 2026-02-24 · accession 0001193125-26-067364

Filing HTML rendered to line-structured narrative text by the shipped reducer (datafeeds.edgar_fulltext.visible_text, keep_table_headers=True): scripts and inline-XBRL headers are dropped, and table content is reduced to its short label cells — numeric table data is not rendered and is therefore not counted. The same rendering is used for every year, so a year-over-year comparison is like for like.

The text is our rendering of the filing, not a facsimile: original pagination, typography and tables are not reproduced, and the numbers live in the financial statements (FA).

The outline locates item HEADINGS in this document. Only Items 1A and 7 have certified boundaries elsewhere in the terminal (the redline and the narrative-overlap number); every span here runs from one heading found to the next heading found.

How the outline was chosen. It is the longest chain of item headings that runs forward through both the document and the standard item order: 23 headings are on that chain and 18 further heading-shaped lines are not — the table-of-contents echo of every item, cross-references and exhibit-list mentions. Each entry's length is measured from its heading to the next heading on the chain.