Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

PAG US Equity

Penske Automotive Group, Inc.Consumer Discretionary · Retail-Auto Dealers & Gasoline Stations · CIK 1019849 · FY ends Dec 31
$216.87
+0.32 (+0.15%)
USD · as of 2026-08-21 · marketstack

PAG · 10-K · period ended 2023-12-31

← all PAG documents
filed 2024-02-16 · EDGAR original ↗

Our rendering of the filing — original pagination and typography are not reproduced, and tables are reduced to their short label cells (the figures live on FA). Nothing is summarized: every line below is the filing's own text.

blocks 269668 of 1,493381k characters rendered

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, prospects, and the prevailing market price and performance of our common stock may be affected by a number of factors, including the matters discussed below. Certain statements and information set forth herein as well as other written or oral statements made from time to time by us or by our authorized officers on our behalf, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Federal Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “goal,” “plan,” “seek,” “project,” “continue,” “will,” “would,” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. We intend for our forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and we set forth this statement in order to comply with such safe harbor provisions. You should note that our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or when made, and we undertake no duty or obligation to update or revise our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

19

Table of Contents

Although we believe that the expectations, plans, intentions, and projections reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, such statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

The material risks, uncertainties, and other factors that our stockholders and prospective investors should consider include the following:

Operational Risks

Macro-economic and geo-political conditions. Our performance is impacted by geo-political conditions such as the war in Ukraine and by general economic conditions overall and in particular by economic conditions in the markets in which we operate. These economic conditions include levels of new and used vehicle sales, availability of consumer credit, changes in consumer demand, consumer confidence levels, fuel prices, demand for trucks to move freight with respect to PTS and PTG, the rate of inflation, personal discretionary spending levels, interest rates, and unemployment rates. When the worldwide economy faltered early in 2020, we were adversely affected, and we expect a similar relationship between general economic and industry conditions and our performance in the future. Any geo-political developments that adversely affect the economies of our markets will also likely affect us. Moreover, geo-political conditions can affect the vehicle supply chain as has recently happened with the war in Ukraine. Certain vehicle manufacturers and suppliers are experiencing difficulty sourcing certain parts which is further exacerbating the supply chain difficulties resulting from the demand for labor and the shortage of microchips and other components.

Many of our market countries are experiencing a high rate of inflation. Inflation affects the price of vehicles, the price of parts, the rate of pay of our employees, the cost and availability of consumer credit, and consumer demand. Used vehicle prices in particular have experienced periods of a high rate of inflation in recent years, and continued high rates of inflation may adversely affect consumer demand and increase our costs, which may materially and adversely affect us. Similarly, periods of rapid deflation in vehicle prices may materially and adversely affect our ability to profitably sell the affected vehicles.

Adverse conditions affecting one or more significant automotive manufacturers or suppliers will affect us. Our success depends on the overall success of the automotive industry generally and in particular, on the success of the brands of vehicles that each of our dealerships sell. In 2023, revenue generated at our BMW/MINI, Audi/Volkswagen/Porsche/Bentley, Toyota/Lexus, and Mercedes-Benz/Sprinter/smart dealerships represented 26%, 22%, 13%, and 9%, respectively, or 70% in aggregate, of our total automotive dealership revenues. In addition, our retail commercial truck operations rely principally on Freightliner and Western Star trucks (both Daimler brands).

Significant adverse geo-political events, weather-related events, supply chain issues, or other events that interrupt vehicle or parts supply to our dealerships would likely have a significant and adverse impact on the industry as a whole, including us, particularly if the events impact any of the manufacturers whose franchises generate a significant percentage of our revenue.

COVID-19 and the war in Ukraine have impacted and may continue to impact the supply of vehicles or parts to the U.S. or U.K. markets, and our business could be materially adversely affected. The supply chain required to manufacture and supply parts for the vehicles we sell is highly complex and integrated. Any failure of that supply chain could materially and adversely affect us. Our new vehicle days' supply is 39 as of December 31, 2023, compared to 25 as of December 31, 2022. While we expect to continue to have normal levels of used vehicles for sale (our used vehicle days' supply is 48 as of December 31, 2023, compared to 53 as of December 31, 2022), the lower supply of new vehicles has contributed to higher vehicle gross profit on new vehicles sold, which contributed to our higher overall profitability in recent years. While we expect increased new vehicle availability, continued production disruptions and supply shortages could result in suppressed new and used vehicle sales volumes which would impact the availability and affordability of new and used vehicles and may adversely affect us. As the supply of new vehicles has improved, we have experienced, and may continue to experience, reduced new and used vehicle gross profit together with higher sales volumes.

The success of our commercial vehicle distribution and other business is directly impacted by availability and demand for the vehicles and other products we distribute. We are the exclusive distributor of Western Star commercial trucks, MAN commercial trucks and buses, and Dennis Eagle refuse collection vehicles, together with associated parts, across Australia, New Zealand, and portions of the Pacific. We are also the distributor of diesel and gas engines and power systems in these same markets. The profitability of these businesses depends upon the number of vehicles, engines, power systems, and parts we distribute, which in turn is impacted by demand for these products. We believe demand is subject to general economic conditions, exchange rate fluctuations, regulatory changes, competitiveness of the products, and other

20

Table of Contents

factors over which we have limited control. In the event sales of these products are less than we expect, our related results of operations and cash flows for this aspect of our business may be materially adversely affected. The products we distribute are principally manufactured at a limited number of locations. In the event of a supply disruption, sufficient quantities of the vehicles, engines, power systems, and parts are not made available to us, or if we accept these products and are unable to economically distribute them, our cash flows or results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

Australian economic conditions. Our commercial vehicle distribution and other operations in Australia and New Zealand may be impacted by local and regional economic conditions and in particular, the price of commodities such as copper and iron ore, which may impact the desire of our customers to operate their mining operations and replace their vehicle fleets. Adverse pricing concerns of those, and other commodities, may have a material adverse effect on our ability to distribute, and/or retail, commercial vehicles and other products profitably. These same conditions may also negatively impact the value of the Australian and New Zealand Dollar versus the U.S. Dollar, which negatively impacts our U.S. Dollar reported financial results and the pricing of products sold by Penske Australia, which are manufactured in the U.S., U.K., and Germany.

Additional risks relating to PTS. PTS' business has additional risks to those in the retail business:

Customers. PTS has a more concentrated customer base than we do and is subject to changes in the financial health of its customers, changes in their asset utilization rates, and increased competition for those customers.

Workforce. PTS requires a significant number of qualified drivers and technicians, which may be difficult to hire, and is subject to increased compliance costs or work stoppages relating to those employees, particularly in regard to changes in labor laws and time of work rules regarding those employees. PTS contributes to several U.S. multi-employer pension plans that provide defined benefits to approximately 2,540 associates covered by collective bargaining agreements. If they withdraw or are deemed to withdraw from participation in any of these plans, then applicable law could require them to make withdrawal liability payments to the plan. If any of those plans were deemed to be underfunded, PTS could be subject to additional assessments, which could be substantial.

Fleet risk. As one of the largest purchasers of commercial trucks in North America, PTS requires continued availability from truck manufacturers and suppliers of vehicles and parts for its fleet, which may be uncertain, in particular if a significant recall were to occur. PTS is affected by the same supply issues noted above and any failure of the supply chain resulting in limited availability of new trucks or parts may have a material adverse impact on PTS. In addition, because PTS sells a large number of trucks each year and is subject to residual risk for the vehicles it leases to customers, changes in values of used trucks affects PTS' profitability.

Capital markets risk. PTS relies on banks and the capital markets to fund its operations and capital commitments. PTS has a significant amount of total indebtedness, which it uses in part to purchase its vehicle fleet and therefore, is subject to changes in, and continued access to, capital markets.

Regulatory Requirements and Vehicle Mandates. Increasing efforts to control emissions of carbon dioxide and certain other gases, referred to as greenhouse gases (“GHGs”), are likely to have an effect on PTS' (and PTG's) business and results of operations. In particular, President Biden and Congressional leaders, as well as California, New Jersey, and other states, have expressed support for policies limiting GHG emissions from vehicles through new regulations that require moving to zero-emission formats and/or the implementation of more stringent emissions controls. For example, original equipment manufacturers may be required to install additional engine components, additional aerodynamic features, or low-rolling resistance tires to comply with fuel economy regulations, which may result in higher costs associated with more complex components and a shorter useful tread life for tires, increasing operating costs for customers, suppliers, and PTS. Additionally, the Advanced Clean Trucks rule, as adopted by the California Air Resources Board ("CARB") and several other states, will require that certain truck manufacturers sell zero-emission trucks as an increasing percentage of their annual sales in these states from 2024 to 2035 (and likely beyond). Furthermore, the Advanced Clean Fleet rule, issued by CARB in April 2023, and which may be adopted in other jurisdictions, will require certain larger fleets, including PTS', to purchase zero-emission trucks to comprise an increasing percentage of their fleets from 2025 to 2042. On December 28, 2023, CARB announced that it would defer enforcement of the rule, which was scheduled to become effective on January 1, 2024, while its request for a waiver from the EPA to authorize the rule is pending. The EPA's three phase Clean Trucks Plan includes pledges to update current GHG standards to reflect market shifts to zero-emission technologies in certain segments of the heavy-duty vehicle sector and new, more stringent GHG emissions standards for heavy-duty engines and vehicles beginning as soon as model year 2027. The EPA initiated the first phase of the Clean Trucks Plan by issuing a final rule on

21

Table of Contents

December 20, 2022, which focuses on reducing emissions that form smog and soot and will apply to heavy-duty engines and vehicles beginning in model year 2027. Foreign, federal, state, provincial, and local lawmakers also are considering a variety of other climate change proposals, including prohibiting the use of certain substances with high “global warming potential.” These and any other future requirements could result in higher prices for vehicles, diesel engines, materials, and fuel, as well as higher maintenance costs and uncertainty as to reliability and range of the new engines. Any of these factors could increase operating costs in the transportation industry, which would directly affect PTS' and PTG's customers and could reduce demand for vehicles. The new technology and legal requirements may also affect the resale values of these vehicles when PTS or PTG attempts to sell them in the future.

Centralized Information Systems. PTS relies heavily on centralized information systems to process lease and rental transactions, manage its fleet of vehicles, account for its activities, and otherwise conduct its business. A failure of a major system, or a major disruption of communications between the system and the locations it serves, could cause a loss of reservations, interfere with PTS' ability to manage its fleet, impede real-time diagnostics of vehicles, slow leasing, rental, and sales processes, and otherwise adversely affect PTS' ability to manage its business.

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted our business, and any future pandemic could adversely affect us. The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic across the globe has adversely impacted each of our markets and the global economy, leading to disruptions to our business. Any future pandemic could impact production levels from our manufacturing partners, impose other unintended consequences, and require us to adjust our operations to conform to regulatory changes and consumer preferences in the evolving environment.

Potential pandemic impacts could include changes in customer demand, our relationship with, and the financial and operational capacities of, vehicle manufacturers, captive finance companies and other suppliers, workforce availability, risks associated with our indebtedness (including available borrowing capacity, compliance with financial covenants, and ability to refinance or repay indebtedness on favorable terms), the adequacy of our cash flow and earnings and other conditions which may affect our liquidity, and disruptions to our technology network and other critical systems, including our dealer management systems and software or other facilities or equipment. Business disruption as a result of a future pandemic could also negatively impact the global economy and may materially affect our businesses as outlined above, or in other manners including global supply chain disruptions resulting in lower levels of vehicles and parts available for sale, all of which would adversely impact our business and results of operations.

Strategic Risks

Brand reputation. Our businesses and our commercial vehicle operations, in particular, as those are more concentrated with a particular manufacturer, are impacted by consumer demand and brand preference, including consumers' perception of the quality of those brands. A decline in the quality and brand reputation of the vehicles or other products we sell or distribute, as a result of events such as manufacturer recalls or legal proceedings, may adversely affect our business. If such events were to occur, the profitability of our business related to those manufacturers could be adversely affected.

Our business is very competitive. We generally compete with other franchised dealerships in our markets, used vehicle dealerships, private market buyers and sellers of used vehicles, an increasing number of internet-based vehicle sellers, electric vehicle manufacturers that sell direct to consumers, national and local service and repair shops and parts retailers with respect to commercial vehicles, distributors of similar products, and manufacturers in certain markets. Purchase decisions by consumers when shopping for a vehicle are extremely price sensitive. The level of competition in the market can lead to lower selling prices and related profits. If there is a prolonged drop in retail prices or if new vehicle sales are allowed to be made over the internet or otherwise without the involvement of franchised dealers, our business could be materially adversely affected.

Changes to the retail delivery model, including increased digital retailer competition, efforts to sell vehicles direct outside the franchise system, and transition to an agency model of distribution each could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

Competition from online retailers. The automotive retail industry is experiencing competition in the used vehicle market from companies with a primarily online business model, including companies such as Carvana and others. We and the other traditional automotive retailers are implementing digital retail strategies, providing consumers with online vehicle purchasing experiences, including at-home delivery. We also continue to develop technology solutions to improve the online buying experience. We may face increased competition for market share with these non-traditional delivery models and digital retailers over time which could materially and adversely affect our results of

22

Table of Contents

operations. We cannot be sure that our initiatives will be successful or that the amount we invest in these initiatives will result in our maintaining or enhancing our market share and continued or improved financial performance.

Sales outside the franchise system. In recent years, new electric vehicle manufacturers have been able to conduct new vehicle sales outside of the franchised automotive system as new entrants. While the sales levels of these new entrants were approximately 4.6% of new vehicles in the U.S. and approximately 2.6% of new vehicles in the U.K. for the year ended December 31, 2023, continued market share gains by manufacturers operating outside the franchise system may materially and adversely affect us. Moreover, while we expect continued good relations with our manufacturer partners, should U.S. franchise laws be repealed or amended to allow our existing manufacturer partners to effectively operate outside the franchised system, our results of operations may be materially and adversely impacted. Our franchised automotive dealers in the U.K., European Union, and Japan operate effectively without U.S. franchise law protections.

Agency. Beginning in 2023, we transitioned our Mercedes-Benz U.K. dealerships to an agency model under which these dealerships, and a limited number of our other dealerships in Europe, receive a fee for facilitating the sale by the manufacturer of a new vehicle but do not hold the vehicle in inventory. Vehicles sold under this agency model are counted as new agency units sold instead of new retail units sold by us, and only the fee we receive from the manufacturer, not the price of the vehicle, is reported as new revenue (as opposed to previously recording all of the vehicle sale price as new revenue) with no corresponding cost of sale. We continue to provide new vehicle customer service at our Mercedes-Benz U.K. dealerships, and the Mercedes-Benz U.K. agency model at this time has not changed our used vehicle sales operations or service and parts operations, although the long-term impact of the agency model at these dealerships as well as other agency models proposed by our manufacturer partners is uncertain. We believe transition to an agency model in the U.S. would be difficult for the manufacturers in light of U.S. franchise laws. See the risk captioned "Sales outside the franchise system" above.

New mobility models and vehicle electrification will continue to result in rapid changes to the automotive and trucking industries.Shared vehicle services such as Uber and Lyft provide consumers with increased choice in their personal mobility options. The effect of these and similar mobility options on the retail automotive industry is uncertain and may include lower levels of new vehicles sales but with increasing miles driven, which could require additional demand for vehicle maintenance. Most major vehicle manufacturers have announced plans to electrify some or all of their new vehicle fleets in response to concerns about the environment and due to regulatory requirements to limit vehicle emissions. We expect to continue to sell electric and hybrid gas/electric vehicles through our franchised dealerships; however, our service revenues may decline over time as these vehicles may require less physical maintenance than gas and hybrid vehicles due to the absence of certain parts systems. Conversely, increasing consumer adoption of electric vehicles may present new service opportunities, including with respect to range maintenance and optimization, cooling protection, torque protection, battery replacement, and warranty on newly released models.

The effects of the eventual adoption of driverless vehicles are uncertain. Technological advances are facilitating the evolution of driverless vehicles. While many manufacturers offer varying degrees of driver assistance technology, the timing of adoption of true driverless vehicles remains uncertain due to regulatory requirements, additional technological requirements, and uncertain consumer acceptance of these vehicles. The effect of driverless vehicles on the automotive retail and trucking industries is uncertain and could include changes in the level of new and used vehicles sales, the price of new and used vehicles, the levels of service required by driverless vehicles and the role of franchised dealers, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business.

Key personnel. We believe that our success depends to a significant extent upon the efforts and abilities of our senior management and in particular, upon Roger Penske who is our Chair and Chief Executive Officer. To the extent Mr. Penske, or other key personnel, were to depart from our Company unexpectedly, our business could be significantly disrupted.

Financial Risks

Leverage. Our significant debt and other commitments expose us to a number of risks, including:

Cash requirements for debt and lease obligations.A significant portion of the cash flow we generate must be used to service the interest and principal payments relating to our various financial commitments, including $3.8 billion of floor plan notes payable, $1.6 billion of non-vehicle long-term debt, and $5.3 billion of future lease commitments(including extension periods that are reasonably assured of being exercised and assuming constant consumer price indices). A sustained or significant decrease in our operating cash flows could lead to an inability to meet our debt

23

Table of Contents

service or lease requirements or to a failure to meet specified financial and operating covenants included in certain of our agreements. If this were to occur, it may lead to a default under one or more of our commitments and potentially the acceleration of amounts due, which could have a significant and adverse effect on us.

Credit Availability. Because we finance the majority of our operating and strategic initiatives using a variety of commitments, including floor plan notes payable and revolving credit facilities, we are dependent on continued availability of these sources of funds. If these agreements are terminated or we are unable to access them because of a breach of financial or operating covenants or otherwise, we will likely be materially affected.

Interest rate variability. The interest rates we are charged on a substantial portion of our debt, including the floor plan notes payable we issue to purchase the majority of our inventory, are variable, increasing or decreasing based on changes in certain published interest rates. Increases to such interest rates have resulted and may continue to result in higher interest expense for us, which negatively affects our operating results. Because many of our customers finance their vehicle purchases, increased interest rates may also decrease vehicle sales due to affordability, which would negatively affect our operating results.

Impairment of our goodwill or other indefinite-lived intangible assets has in the past had, and in the future could have, a material adverse impact on our earnings. We evaluate goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually and upon the occurrence of an indicator of impairment. Our process and results for impairment testing of these assets is described further under “Impairment Testing” in Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates. If we determine that the amount of our goodwill or other indefinite-lived intangible assets are impaired at any point in time, we would be required to reduce the value of these assets on our balance sheet, which would also result in a material non-cash impairment charge that could also have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for the period in which the impairment occurs.

Performance of sublessees. In connection with the sale, relocation, and closure of certain of our franchises, we have entered into a number of third-party sublease agreements. The rent paid by our sub-tenants on such properties in 2023 totaled approximately $17.0 million. In the aggregate, we remain ultimately liable for approximately $95.2 million of such lease payments including payments relating to all available renewal periods. We rely on our sub-tenants to pay the rent and maintain the properties covered by these leases. In the event a subtenant does not perform under the terms of their lease with us, we could be required to fulfill such obligations, which could have a significant and adverse effect on us.

International and foreign currency exchange risk. We have significant operations outside of the U.S. that expose us to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and to the impact of economic and political conditions in the markets where we operate. As exchange rates fluctuate, our results of operations as reported in U.S. Dollars fluctuate. For example, if the U.S. Dollar strengthens against the British Pound, our U.K. results of operations would translate into less U.S. Dollar reported results. Sustained levels or an increase in the value of the U.S. Dollar, particularly as compared to the British Pound, could result in a significant and adverse effect on our reported results.

Joint ventures. We have significant investments in a variety of joint ventures, including retail automotive operations in Germany, Italy, and Spain. We have a 28.9% interest in PTS. We expect to receive annual operating distributions from PTS and the other ventures and in the case of PTS, realize significant cash savings on taxes. These benefits may not be realized if the joint ventures do not perform as expected, or if changes in tax, financial, or regulatory requirements negatively impact the results of the joint venture operations. Our ability to dispose of these investments may be limited. In addition, the relevant joint venture agreement and other contractual restrictions may limit our access to the cash flows of these joint ventures. For example, certain of PTS' debt agreements allow partner distributions only as long as it is not in default under those agreements and the amount it pays does not exceed 50% of its consolidated net income, unless its debt-to-equity ratio is less than 3.0 to 1.0, in which case its distributions may not exceed 80% of its consolidated net income.

Legal and Compliance Risks

Vehicle manufacturers exercise significant control over us. Each of our new vehicle dealerships and distributor operations operate under franchise and other agreements with automotive manufacturers, commercial vehicle manufacturers, or related distributors. These agreements govern almost every aspect of the operation of our dealerships and give manufacturers the discretion to terminate or not renew our franchise agreements for a variety of reasons, including certain events outside our control such as accumulation of our stock by third parties. They also limit our ability to acquire dealerships on a national, regional, and local basis. Without franchise or distributor agreements, we would be unable to sell or distribute new vehicles or perform manufacturer authorized warranty service. If a significant number of our franchise agreements are terminated, not renewed, or, with respect to our distributor operations, a competing distributor were introduced, we would be materially affected.

24

Table of Contents

Regulatory Issues. We are subject to a wide variety of regulatory activities and oversight, including:

Governmental regulations, claims, and legal proceedings. Governmental regulations affect almost every aspect of our business, including the fair treatment of our employees, wage and hour issues, and our financing activities with customers. In California, previous judicial decisions have called into question whether long-standing methods for compensating dealership employees comply with the local wage and hour rules and may do so again. We could be susceptible to claims or related actions if we fail to operate our business in accordance with applicable laws or it is determined that long-standing compensation methods did not comply with local laws. Many laws and regulations applicable to our business were adopted prior to the introduction of online vehicle sales, the Internet and certain digital technology, generally. As a result, we are tasked with maintaining compliance in an uncertain regulatory environment. Claims arising out of actual or alleged violations of law which may be asserted against us or any of our dealers by individuals, through class actions, or by governmental entities in civil or criminal investigations and proceedings, may expose us to substantial monetary damages which may adversely affect us.

Our financing activities with customers are subject to truth-in-lending, consumer leasing, equal credit opportunity, and similar regulations as well as motor vehicle finance laws, installment finance laws, insurance laws, usury laws, and other installment sales laws. In the U.K., the Financial Conduct Authority (the "FCA") regulates financial services firms and financial markets, including our activities in acting as broker for the financing of vehicle sales. The FCA has announced that it will investigate the historic use of discretionary commission arrangements ("DCAs") amid concerns that this practice may have been unfair to customers. The purpose of the investigation is to consider whether the historic use of DCAs caused customers to pay too much for their car loans and, if so, to consider potential remediation measures. The investigation is being undertaken after the Financial Ombudsman Service (a public body, which resolves financial complaints) determined that DCAs, in two separate cases which do not involve us, had caused financial losses to customers. We await the outcome of the FCA’s investigation. Any regulatory or judicial outcome that ultimately results in the refund of historical commissions paid to us could materially and adversely affect us.

Privacy Regulation. We are subject to numerous laws and regulations in the U.S. and internationally designed to protect the information of clients, customers, employees, and other third parties that we collect and maintain, including the European Union General Data Protection Regulation (the “EUGDPR”) and the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation (the "UKGDPR"). Both the EUGDPR and UKGDPR, among other things, mandate requirements regarding the handling of personal data of employees and customers, including its use, protection, and the ability of persons whose data is stored to correct or delete such data about themselves. The state of California has a similar law called the California Consumer Privacy Act, recently amended and enhanced effective January 1, 2023, by the California Privacy Rights Act (as so amended, the "CCPA"). In addition to enforcement authority granted to the California Attorney General, the CCPA established the "California Privacy Protection Agency," a dedicated state agency charged with the authority to audit and enforce privacy rules, among other responsibilities, and the CCPA permits a private right of action for certain violations of law. Other U.S. states have also enacted comprehensive consumer privacy laws, and additional states may follow. These laws pose increasingly complex and rigorous compliance challenges, which may increase our compliance costs and related risk. If we fail to comply with these laws or other similar regulations applicable to our business, we could be subject to reputational harm and significant litigation, monetary damages, regulatory enforcement actions, or fines in one or more jurisdictions. For example, a failure to comply with the UKGDPR could result in fines up to the greater of £17.5 million or 4% of annual global revenues.

Recalls. Legislative and regulatory bodies from time to time have considered laws or regulations that would prohibit companies from renting or selling any vehicle that is subject to a recall until the recall service is performed. Whether any such prohibition may be enacted, and its ultimate scope, cannot be determined at this time. If a law or regulation is enacted that prevents the sale of vehicles until recall service has been performed, we could be required to reserve a significant portion of our vehicles from being available for sale for even a minor recall unrelated to vehicle safety. In addition, various manufacturers have issued stop sale notices in relation to certain recalls that require that we retain vehicles until the recall can be performed, whether or not parts are then available. While servicing recall vehicles yields parts and service revenue to us, the inability to sell a significant portion of our vehicles could increase our costs and have an adverse effect on our results of operations if a large number of our vehicles are the subject of simultaneous recalls or if needed replacement parts are not in adequate supply.

Vehicle requirements. Federal and state governments and regulators in both our domestic and international markets have increasingly placed restrictions and limitations on the vehicles sold in the market in an effort to combat perceived negative environmental effects. For example, in the U.S., automotive manufacturers are subject to federally mandated corporate average fuel economy standards, which will increase substantially through 2026. Moreover, the

25

Table of Contents

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) has proposed new requirements for model year 2027 and later vehicles which are significantly more restrictive than existing requirements which are designed to incent an increased adoption of electric vehicles. Representatives of the U.K. government have proposed a ban on the sale of gasoline engines and gasoline hybrid engines in new cars and new vans that would take effect in 2035 while also providing government incentives on certain electric vehicles to entice consumers to transition from internal combustion vehicles to electric vehicles. The European Parliament recently approved a law requiring most automakers to reduce the emissions of new cars sold by 55% in 2030 and achieve a zero carbon-emission standard by 2035, effectively banning the sale of new gasoline and diesel cars and vans by 2035. Similar legislation in various states across the United States would ban the sale of new vehicles with gasoline-only engines in cars as early as 2035. The California legislation requires 35% of all new vehicles sold to meet a zero emissions standard by 2026 (with certain allowances for hybrid gas/electric vehicles), which percentage requirement increases until 2035, after which 100% of new vehicles sold must comply. Significant increases in fuel economy requirements and new restrictions on emissions on vehicles and fuels could adversely affect prices of and demand for the vehicles that we sell, which could materially adversely affect us.

Commercial trucks are subject to similar regulatory risks related to emissions standards and other regulatory requirements discussed above. The EPA has also recently proposed to revise existing standards to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from heavy-duty vehicles in model year 2027 and set new, more stringent standards for model years 2028 through 2032. PTG sells new and used heavy- and medium-duty commercial trucks, parts and service, and offers collision repair services. PTS, with its broad product offering including full-service truck leasing, contract maintenance, and truck rental, along with logistics services, is one of the largest purchasers of commercial trucks in North America. Should future regulations or consumer sentiment hinder our or PTS' ability to maintain, acquire, sell, or operate trucks, we may be adversely affected.

Tariff and trade risk. Increased tariffs, import product restrictions, and foreign trade risks may impair our ability to sell foreign vehicles profitably. Should tariffs increase, we expect the price of many new vehicles we sell to increase, which may adversely affect our new vehicle sales and related finance and insurance sales. Moreover, new rules in place after the Brexit accord between the European Union and the U.K. require varying levels of content in vehicles to originate in either the U.K. or the European Union to remain tariff free. If automotive manufacturers cannot meet these content rules, there may be import tariffs on any affected vehicles, which could adversely affect our U.K. results.

Franchise laws in the U.S. In the U.S., state law generally provides protections to franchised vehicle dealers from discriminatory practices by manufacturers and from unreasonable termination or non-renewal of their franchise agreements. In many states, the laws require that new vehicle sales be conducted exclusively by automotive retailers (not manufacturers). Should U.S. franchise laws be repealed or amended to allow our existing manufacturer partners to effectively operate outside the franchised system, our results of operations may be materially and adversely impacted. See the risk factor captioned “Sales outside the franchise system” above.

Changes in law. New laws and regulations at the state and federal level may be enacted which could materially adversely impact our business. For example, in December 2023, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (the "FTC") announced its new Combating Auto Retail Scams ("CARS") Rule, which would change the way vehicles are advertised and sold in the U.S. The rule originally was to take effect in July 2024. However, in light of recent legal challenges, the FTC has delayed the rule's effective date pending resolution of related litigation. Once effective, the rules are expected to change industry-accepted practices with regard to sales and advertising, require a series of oral and written disclosures to consumers in regard to the sale price of vehicles, credit terms, and voluntary protection products, and impose burdensome recordkeeping requirements, all of which may lead to additional transaction times for the sale of vehicles, complicate the transaction process, decrease customer satisfaction, and increase compliance costs and risk, among other effects. These changes, as well as any others that could be adopted, could have a significant and adverse effect on us.

Climate change and environmental regulations. Scientific evidence suggests that the globe is warming potentially resulting in an environment more prone to natural disasters, such as flooding. To date, we have seen increases in our cost to insure against such risks, which costs could continue to increase should this trend continue.We are subject to a wide range of environmental laws and regulations, including those governing discharges into the air and water; the operation and removal of storage tanks; and the use, storage, and disposal of hazardous substances. In the normal course of our operations we use, generate, and dispose of materials covered by these laws and regulations. In the face of climate change, these laws could become more stringent. We face potentially significant costs relating to claims, penalties, and remediation efforts in the event of non-compliance with existing and future laws and regulations. Furthermore, should climate change continue, we expect further regulation of internal combustion engines and vehicle

26

Table of Contents

emissions which may affect the types of vehicles we sell and service. We cannot predict the future costs to our businesses for these developments.

Accounting and disclosure rules and regulations. Significant changes to generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. ("GAAP") could significantly affect our reported financial position, earnings, and cash flows upon adoption and effectiveness. In addition, any changes to lease accounting could affect PTS customers' decisions to purchase or lease trucks, which could adversely affect their business if leasing becomes a less favorable option. See the disclosure provided under “Recent Accounting Pronouncements” in Part II, Item 8, Note 1 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional detail on accounting standard updates that could have an impact on us. In addition, we are subject to various reporting regimes in the U.S. and internationally. In the U.K., we are subject to the Climate-related Financial Disclosure Regulations which require disclosure of climate risks and opportunities, among other matters. We are also subject to California’s Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act and Climate-Related Financial Risk Act which require disclosure of emissions and other matters. Further, we are subject to the European Sustainability Reporting Standards which also require emissions and other disclosures, as well as any regulations regarding climate and sustainability disclosures eventually adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. We are also subject to regulations in other jurisdictions that we operate in. These multiple sets disclosures standards are not yet clearly defined and require duplicative and sometimes conflicting disclosures. Compliance with these standards will subject us to additional expense and compliance risk which may adversely affect our business.

Related parties. Our two largest stockholders, Penske Corporation and its affiliates (“Penske Corporation”) and Mitsui & Co., Ltd. and its affiliates (“Mitsui”), together beneficially own approximately 71% of our outstanding common stock. The presence of such significant stockholders results in several risks, including:

Our principal stockholders have substantial influence. Penske Corporation and Mitsui have entered into a stockholders agreement pursuant to which they have agreed to vote together as to the election of our directors. As a result, Penske Corporation has the ability to control the composition of our Board of Directors, which may allow it to control our affairs and business. This concentration of ownership coupled with certain provisions contained in our agreements with manufacturers, our certificate of incorporation, and our bylaws could discourage, delay, or prevent a change in control of us.

Some of our directors and officers may have conflicts of interest with respect to certain related party transactions and other business interests. Roger Penske, our Chair and Chief Executive Officer and a director, holds the same offices at Penske Corporation. Robert Kurnick, Jr., our President and a director, is also the Vice Chair and a director of Penske Corporation and an Advisory Board member of PTS. Bud Denker, our Executive Vice President, Human Resources, is also the President of Penske Corporation. Each of these officers is paid much of their compensation by Penske Corporation. The compensation they receive from us is based on their efforts on our behalf; however, they are not required to spend any specific amount of time on our matters. The Vice Chair of our Board of Directors, Greg Penske, is the son of our Chair and also serves as a director of Penske Corporation. Michael Eisenson, one of our directors, is also a director of Penske Corporation and an Advisory Board member of PTS. Lisa Davis, one of our directors, is also an Advisory Board member of PTS. Kota Odagiri, one of our directors, is also an employee of Mitsui. Roger Penske also serves as Chairman of Penske Transportation Solutions, for which he is compensated by PTS.

Penske Corporation ownership levels. Certain of our agreements have clauses that are triggered in the event of a material change in the level of ownership of our common stock by Penske Corporation, such as our trademark agreement between us and Penske Corporation that governs our use of the “Penske” name which can be terminated 24 months after the date that Penske Corporation no longer owns at least 20% of our voting stock. We may not be able to renegotiate such agreements on terms that are acceptable to us, if at all, in the event of a significant change in Penske Corporation's ownership.

We have a significant number of shares of common stock eligible for future sale.Penske Corporation and Mitsui own approximately 71% of our common stock, and each has two demand registration rights that could result in a substantial number of shares being introduced for sale in the market. We also have a significant amount of authorized but unissued shares. Penske Corporation has pledged a substantial portion of its shares of our common stock as collateral to secure a loan facility. A default by Penske Corporation could result in the foreclosure on those shares by the lenders, after which the lenders could attempt to sell those shares on the open market or to a third party. The introduction of any of these shares into the market could have a material adverse effect on our stock price.

27

Table of Contents

General Risks

Property loss, business interruption, or other liabilities. Our business is subject to substantial risk of loss due to the significant concentration of property values, including vehicle and parts inventories at our operating locations; claims by employees, customers, and third parties for personal injury or property damage; and fines and penalties in connection with alleged violations of regulatory requirements. While we have insurance for many of these risks, we retain risk relating to certain of these perils, including through self-insurance, and certain perils are not covered by our insurance. Certain insurers have limited available property coverage in response to the natural catastrophes experienced in recent years. If we experience significant losses that are not covered by our insurance, whether due to adverse weather conditions or otherwise, or we are required to retain a significant portion of a loss, it could have a significant and adverse effect on us.

Information technology. Our information systems are fully integrated into our operations, and we rely on them to operate effectively, including with respect to electronic interfaces with manufacturers and other vendors, customer relationship management, sales and service scheduling, data storage, and financial and operational reporting. The majority of our systems are licensed from third parties; the most significant of which are provided by a limited number of suppliers in the U.S., U.K., and Australia. The failure of our information systems to perform as designed, the failure to protect the integrity of these systems, or the interruption of these systems due to natural disasters, power loss, unexpected termination of our agreements, cyber-attacks, or other reasons could significantly and adversely disrupt our business operations, impact sales and results of operations, expose us to customer or third-party claims, or result in adverse publicity.

Cybersecurity. As part of our business model, we receive sensitive information regarding customers, employees, associates, and vendors from various online and offline channels. We collect, process, retain, and in some cases share this information in the normal course of our business. Our internal and third-party systems are under a heightened level of risk from cyber criminals or other individuals with malicious intent to gain unauthorized access to our systems and exploit the information, including sensitive personal information, that we gather. Cyber-attacks and threats to network and data security are becoming increasingly diverse and sophisticated, with attacks increasing in frequency, scope, and potential harm. In addition, some of our software applications are utilized by third parties who provide outsourced administrative functions. Such third parties may have access to confidential information that is critical to our business operations and services. While our information security program includes enhanced controls to monitor third party providers' security programs, these third parties are subject to their own risks of data breaches, cyber-attacks, and other events or actions that could damage, disrupt, or close down their networks or systems, which in turn may adversely impact our business operations. For an overview of certain of our efforts related to cybersecurity risk management, strategy, and governance and our written Information Security Program, see Item 1C. Cybersecurity.

Despite the security measures we have in place, we may be unable to fully detect, mitigate, or protect against cyber-attacks, ransomware attacks, security breaches, social engineering, malicious software, lost or misplaced data, programming errors, human errors, acts of vandalism, or other events. Many companies have disclosed security breaches involving sophisticated cyber-attacks and ransomware attacks that were not recognized or detected until after such companies had been affected, notwithstanding the preventive measures they had in place. Any security breach or event resulting in the misappropriation, loss, or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential information or degradation of services provided by critical business systems, whether by us directly or our third-party service providers, could adversely affect our business operations, sales, reputation with current and potential customers, associates or vendors as well as other operational and financial impacts derived from investigations, litigation, the imposition of penalties, or other means. In addition, our failure to respond quickly and appropriately to such a security breach could exacerbate the consequences of the breach and efforts to prevent, detect, and mitigate data breaches and cyber-attacks subject us to additional costs.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

Item 1C. Cybersecurity

Risk Management Processes. We recognize the importance of assessing, identifying, and managing material risks from cybersecurity threats to our business and operations and developing, implementing, and maintaining robust cybersecurity measures to safeguard our information systems. As a result, we have integrated the management of cybersecurity threats into our broader risk management efforts, implementing policies and procedures to promote cybersecurity risk management and enhance mitigation efforts against cyber-attacks and similar threats. To help secure our systems that store or transmit electronic information, we have implemented multi-layered preventive controls which use aggregated intelligence to proactively detect, block and evaluate attacks. We also maintain a Chief Information Officer who is charged with

28

Table of Contents

implementing and overseeing our comprehensive written Information Security Program. In connection with our Information Security Program, we perform cybersecurity risk assessments at least annually to analyze the materiality of identified risks, the likelihood of such risks materializing, and the scope and intensity of adverse impacts if such risks result in the compromise of our information systems or sensitive information stored by us or on our behalf.

Our Information Security Program includes proactive measures to manage cybersecurity risks and threats, including mandatory annual security awareness training for all personnel with enhanced training for designated information security personnel; enterprise-wide phishing simulations and security assessments; a business continuity and recovery plan in the event of a cybersecurity incident; and the implementation of targeted access controls and various other measures, including multi-factor authentication, with respect to certain systems containing sensitive information. We have also implemented an incident response plan to guide our response to cybersecurity incidents, with a dedicated, cross-functional response team, including senior management from our information technology, information security, finance, risk management, investor relations and legal teams, responsible for overseeing efforts related to detection, containment, threat mitigation and notification, as appropriate. We identify vulnerabilities in our information systems through proactive scanning of system assets for known vulnerabilities. Our outsourced managed security source operates 24/7, identifying threats and vulnerabilities, and our information security team regularly monitors alerts and meets to discuss trends in cybersecurity threats. We proactively manage vulnerabilities from major software publishers through a global patching program. To prevent unauthorized access to our information systems, we have a system of controls in place to manage user access to our information systems. Our employees acknowledge an acceptable use policy and are trained in how to identify information security risks in the workplace.

Third Party Engagement and Oversight. We engage third-party service providers, including consultants and auditors, to monitor and protect critical assets from cyber-attacks and to enhance certain components of our Information Security Program, including to assist us with annual security assessments, penetration and vulnerability testing, email and web filtering, endpoint protection, and consultation on certain cybersecurity enhancements. These partnerships enable us to leverage specialized knowledge and insights, ensuring our cybersecurity strategies and processes remain current. To oversee and identify cybersecurity threats associated with our use of third-party service providers, we periodically audit and review certain information security practices of critical vendors in possession of sensitive information, including through seeking responses to cybersecurity questionnaires. In the ordinary course of business, we also rely on contractual obligations from certain third-party service providers to meet certain information security standards and to notify and cooperate with us in the event of qualifying cybersecurity incidents.

Board of Directors Oversight. Our business is managed under the direction of our Board of Directors ("the Board"), which guides our long-term strategy and represents the highest level of oversight at the Company. Our Board views the identification and effective management of cybersecurity threats as a critical component of overall risk management and oversight responsibilities. To that end, the Board assures that we maintain robust corporate governance policies designed to promote our culture of uncompromised integrity that have been implemented in a manner that facilitates active oversight and engagement regarding various cybersecurity matters. Consistent with these policies, the Board receives updates regarding cybersecurity threats in connection with its regularly scheduled meetings, as appropriate, and as part of its ongoing strategy and risk management sessions, engages in discussions regarding cybersecurity threats to our operations. In addition to this direct oversight, the Board has delegated oversight responsibilities with respect to cybersecurity risks to the Audit Committee of the Board. In addition to its oversight of the quality and integrity of the Company’s financial statements and internal audit functions, the Audit Committee is also responsible for reviewing the Company’s key risk areas, including cybersecurity risks.

Management's Role in Managing Risk. As noted above, we have a designated Chief Information Officer who is charged with implementing and overseeing our comprehensive written Information Security Program. With over 25 years of experience in the field of information technology and cybersecurity, our Chief Information Officer brings a wealth of expertise to his role and maintains both Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) and Certified Information Systems Auditor (CISA) certifications and additional personnel on our information security team have cybersecurity experience and certifications. Our Chief Information Officer’s background includes extensive experience as an enterprise chief information officer and is well-recognized within our industry. His in-depth knowledge and experience are instrumental in developing and executing our cybersecurity strategies.Our Chief Information Officer reviews with senior management, at least quarterly, the status of our Information Security Program, identified threats to our data security, and cyber incidents relevant to our operations and reviews these matters with our Board and/or Audit Committee at least annually, or more frequently when appropriate. Further, at least quarterly, our senior leadership team, including our Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, Chief Information Officer, Executive Vice President of Financial Services, and Global Risk Management, prepares a comprehensive summary of certain key risks facing the Company (the “Risk Report”). The Risk Report includes feedback from multiple constituencies within the Company, incorporating and

29

Table of Contents

evaluating heightened risk areas identified by senior management, functional area teams within the organization, and management at the regional and local dealership levels. In addition to various enterprise-wide risks identified throughout this management-led process, the Risk Report highlights cybersecurity risks, tasking the Chief Information Officer or his designees with the responsibility to monitor such risks and, as appropriate, implement risk mitigation strategies. The Risk Report also clarifies that both the Board and the Audit Committee retain oversight of such risks. The Risk Report is shared and discussed at least quarterly with the Audit Committee and periodically, with the full Board, with certain specified risks and mitigation efforts reported to the Board or designated standing committees on a more frequent basis, as appropriate.

We and others across our industry face a number of cybersecurity risks in connection with our business and operations. Although such risks have not materially affected our business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition to date, we have, from time to time, experienced threats to, and incidents in connection with, our information systems. Any security breach or event resulting in the unauthorized disclosure of our information or the information of our customers or the degradation of services provided by our critical business systems, whether by us directly or our third-party service providers, could adversely affect our business operations, sales, reputation with current and potential customers, associates, or vendors as well as other operational and financial impacts derived from investigations, litigation, the imposition of penalties, or other means. For more information about the cybersecurity risks we face, see the risk factors entitled "Information technology," "Cybersecurity" and "Regulatory Issues – Privacy Regulation" in discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Item 2. Properties

We own our headquarters building in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan and some of our dealership facilities. We lease or sublease many of our other dealership properties and other facilities. These leases are generally for a period of between 5 and 20 years and are typically structured to include renewal options at our election. We lease office space in Leicester, England and other regions for administrative and other corporate-related activities. We believe that our facilities are sufficient for our needs and are in good repair.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

On December 27, 2023, Plaintiff Jeffrey Edelman (“Plaintiff”), a purported stockholder of ours, filed a putative class action and stockholder derivative complaint (the “Complaint”) in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the “Court”) against all of our directors, a former director, and Penske Corporation (“PC”) (together, the “Defendants”) under the caption Edelman v. Penske, et al., C.A. No. 2023-1291-JTL (the “Action”). The claims in the Complaint related to our securities repurchase programs in 2021, 2022, and 2023. Among other allegations, the Plaintiff claimed that Board members breached their fiduciary duties in approving these securities repurchase programs and that PC and Roger S. Penske as controllers of the Company also breached their fiduciary duties because the repurchase programs allegedly permitted the controllers to attain majority voting control of the Company without paying a control premium. The Defendants believe that the allegations of the Complaint were meritless, deny those allegations, and deny that any violation of applicable law has occurred. However, solely to minimize expenses and distraction and to avoid the uncertainty of any litigation, we entered into the Voting Agreement defined and described in the Company's prior Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 24, 2024, and below. On January 24, 2024, the parties entered into a Stipulation and Proposed Order Voluntarily Dismissing The Action As Moot (the “Stipulation and Proposed Order”), pursuant to which the Court would retain jurisdiction regarding any application Plaintiff may make for an award of attorney’s fees. The Court entered the Stipulation and Proposed Order on January 24, 2024, and retained jurisdiction to approve a form of notice concerning attorneys’ fees payable to Plaintiff in connection with the Voting Agreement and the Action. The Company subsequently agreed to pay $995,000 in attorneys’ fees and expenses in full satisfaction of any and all claims by Plaintiff and all of his counsel for fees and expenses in the Action. On February 8, 2024, the Court entered an order closing the Action, subject to the Company filing an affidavit with the Court confirming that this notice has been issued.

In entering the order, the Court was not asked to review, and did not pass judgment on, the payment of the attorneys’ fees and expenses or their reasonableness. Plaintiff’s counsel are Stephen E. Jenkins and Tiffany Geyer Lydon of Ashby & Geddes, P.A., (302) 654-1888, and Gregory Mark Nespole, Daniel Tepper, Correy A. Suk, and Cinar Oney of Levi & Korsinsky, LLP, (212) 363-7500. Counsel to the Company and the individual defendants except for Roger S. Penske are Raymond J. DiCamillo and Blake Rohrbacher of Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., (302) 651-7700. Counsel to Roger S. Penske and PC is John P. DiTomo of Morris, Nichols, Arsht, & Tunnell LLP, (302) 351-9329.

PC currently beneficially owns 34,181,121 shares of our Voting Common Stock, representing 51% of our outstanding Voting Common Stock. On January 23, 2024, we entered into a voting agreement (the “Voting Agreement”) with PC pursuant to which PC agreed, on each matter brought to a vote at any annual or special meeting of our stockholders and in

30

Table of Contents

connection with any action proposed to be taken by consent of our stockholders in lieu of a meeting, to vote all shares of Voting Common Stock, or other voting or equity securities of ours which could be issued (together with the Voting Common Stock, the “Voting Securities”) beneficially owned by PC, that, together with the Voting Securities held by Roger S. Penske, our Chair and Chief Executive Officer, and any entity that Roger S. Penske controls, exceed 43.57% of the outstanding Voting Securities (the “Excess Voting Securities”), in the same proportion as all votes cast by stockholders other than PC, Roger S. Penske or any entity that Roger S. Penske controls (except as otherwise required by the existing PM Shareholders Agreement as defined and described below). Any Voting Securities that are not Excess Voting Securities may be voted at the discretion of PC. The Voting Agreement will terminate per its terms at the time that PC ceases to beneficially own 30% or more of the Voting Securities then outstanding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Voting Agreement does not impact the provisions of that certain stockholders agreement (the “PM Shareholders Agreement”) by and among PC, Penske Automotive Holdings Corp. (the “Penske companies”) and Mitsui pursuant to which, in connection with any stockholder election of directors of the Company, (i) the Penske companies have agreed to vote their shares for two directors who are representatives of Mitsui as long as Mitsui owns in excess of 20% of our outstanding common stock, and for one director as long as Mitsui owns in excess of 10% of our outstanding common stock, and (ii) Mitsui in turn has agreed to vote its shares for up to fourteen directors voted for by the Penske companies.

In addition to the matters discussed above, from time to time we are a party to litigation and other legal proceedings, including class action claims and purported class action claims, in the ordinary course of business. Such claims may be brought by governmental authorities, customers, vendors, stockholders, or employees. We are not a party to any legal proceedings, including class action lawsuits, that individually or in the aggregate are reasonably expected to have a material effect on us. However, the results of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5.Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “PAG.” As of February 13, 2024, there were 225 holders of record of our common stock.

Dividends

We have announced a cash dividend of $0.87 per share payable on March 1, 2024, to stockholders of record as of February 15, 2024. While future quarterly or other cash dividends will depend upon a variety of factors considered relevant by our Board of Directors, which may include our expectations regarding the severity and duration of vehicle production issues, the rate of inflation, including its impact on vehicle affordability, earnings, cash flow, capital requirements, restrictions relating to any then-existing indebtedness, financial condition, alternative uses of capital, and other factors, we currently expect to continue to pay comparable dividends in the future.

Securities Repurchases

As of December 31, 2023, $215.5 million remained outstanding and available for repurchases under our securities repurchase program approved by our Board of Directors. This authority has no expiration. For further information with respect to repurchases of our shares by us, see Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources — "Securities Repurchases" and Part II, Item 8, Note 14 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

31

Table of Contents

SHARE INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE

The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder returns on our common stock based on an investment of $100 on December 31, 2018, and the close of the market on December 31 of each year thereafter against (i) the Standard & Poor's 500 Index and (ii) an industry/peer group consisting of Asbury Automotive Group, Inc., AutoNation, Inc., Group 1 Automotive, Inc., Lithia Motors, Inc., and Sonic Automotive, Inc (the "Peer Group"). The graph assumes the reinvestment of all dividends.

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*

Among Penske Automotive Group, Inc., the S&P 500 Index, and a Peer Group

________________________

* $100 invested on 12/31/18 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending December 31.

Cumulative Total Return

32

Table of Contents

Item 6. Reserved

Reserved.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition andResults of Operations

This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results ofOperations contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-lookingstatements as a result of various factors, including those discussed in “Item 1A.Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements.” We have acquired and initiated a number of businesses during the periods presented and addressed in this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Ourfinancial statements include the results of operations of those businesses fromthe date acquired or when they commenced operations. Our period-to-period results of operations may vary depending on the dates of acquisitions or disposals.

Overview

We are a diversified international transportation services company and one of the world's premier automotive and commercial truck retailers. We operate dealerships in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, Italy, and Japan, and we are one of the largest retailers of commercial trucks in North America for Freightliner. We also distribute and retail commercial vehicles, diesel and gas engines, power systems, and related parts and services principally in Australia and New Zealand. We employ approximately 28,000 people worldwide. Additionally, we own 28.9% of Penske Transportation Solutions, a business that employs over 44,000 people worldwide, manages one of the largest, most comprehensive and modern trucking fleets in North America with over 439,000 trucks, tractors, and trailers under lease, rental, and/or maintenance contracts, and provides innovative transportation, supply chain, and technology solutions to its customers.

Business Overview

In 2023, our business generated $29.5 billion in total revenue, which is comprised of approximately $25.2 billion from retail automotive dealerships, $3.7 billion from retail commercial truck dealerships, and $634.0 million from commercial vehicle distribution and other operations. We generated $4.9 billion in gross profit, which is comprised of $4.2 billion from retail automotive dealerships, $592.4 million from retail commercial truck dealerships, and $165.2 million from commercial vehicle distribution and other operations.

Retail Automotive. We are one of the largest global automotive retailers as measured by the $25.2 billion in total retail automotive dealership revenue we generated in 2023. We are diversified geographically with 56% of our total retail automotive dealership revenues in 2023 generated in the U.S. and Puerto Rico and 44% generated outside of the U.S. We offer over 35 vehicle brands with 71% of our retail automotive franchised dealership revenue in 2023 generated from premium brands, such as Audi, BMW, Land Rover, Mercedes-Benz, and Porsche. As of December 31, 2023, we operated 336 retail automotive franchised dealerships, of which 147 are located in the U.S. and 189 are located outside of the U.S. The franchised dealerships outside of the U.S. are located primarily in the U.K. As of December 31, 2023, we also operated 19 used vehicle dealerships, with seven dealerships in the U.S. and 12 dealerships in the U.K., which retailed used vehicles under a one price, "no-haggle" methodology under the CarShop brand. We retailed and wholesaled, including agency units, more than 587,000 vehicles in 2023.

Each of our franchised dealerships offers a wide selection of new and used vehicles for sale. In addition to selling new and used vehicles, we generate higher-margin revenue at each of our dealerships through maintenance and repair services, the sale and placement of third-party finance and insurance products, third-party extended service and maintenance contracts, replacement and aftermarket automotive products, and at certain of our locations, collision repair services. We operate our franchised dealerships under franchise agreements with a number of automotive manufacturers and distributors that are subject to certain rights and restrictions typical of the industry. Beginning in 2023, we transitioned our Mercedes-Benz U.K. dealerships to an agency model under which these dealerships, and a limited number of our other dealerships in Europe, receive a fee for facilitating the sale by the manufacturer of a new vehicle but do not hold the vehicle in inventory. Vehicles sold under this agency model are counted as new agency units sold instead of new retail units sold by us, and only the fee we receive from the manufacturer, not the price of the vehicle, is reported as new revenue (as opposed to previously recording all of the vehicle sale price as new revenue) with no corresponding cost of sale. We continue to provide new vehicle customer service under the agency model, and the Mercedes-Benz U.K. agency model at this time has not changed our used vehicle sales operations or service and parts operations, although the long-term impact of the agency model at these dealerships as well as other agency models proposed by our manufacturer partners is uncertain. See Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors for a discussion of agency.

33

Table of Contents

During 2023, we acquired two retail automotive franchises in the U.S and two retail automotive franchises in Italy. We also closed seven locations in the U.S., consisting of six retail automotive franchises and one CarShop location, and we closed five locations in the U.K., consisting of four retail automotive franchises and one CarShop location. Retail automotive dealerships represented 85.4% of our total revenues and 84.6% of our total gross profit in 2023. In January 2024, we acquired Rybrook Group Limited, consisting of 16 retail automotive franchises in the U.K., including four BMW franchises, four MINI franchises, four Volvo franchises, two Land Rover franchises, one Jaguar franchise, and one Porsche franchise. Three of the BMW locations also retail BMW Motorrad motorcycles. In January 2024, we also closed one CarShop location in the U.S. and acquired one Ford dealership and one Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Ram dealership in the U.S.

Retail Commercial Truck Dealership. We operate Premier Truck Group ("PTG"), a heavy- and medium-duty truck dealership group offering primarily Freightliner and Western Star trucks (both Daimler brands), with locations across nine U.S. states and the Canadian provinces of Ontario and Manitoba. During 2023, we acquired three full-service dealerships and two service and parts centers in Canada. As of December 31, 2023, PTG operated 44 locations selling new and/or used trucks, performing service and parts operations, or offering collision repair services. We retailed and wholesaled 21,846 new and used trucks in 2023. This business represented 12.5% of our total revenues and 12.0% of our total gross profit in 2023. In January 2024, we closed one service and parts location in Canada.

Penske Australia. Penske Australia is the exclusive importer and distributor of Western Star heavy-duty trucks (a Daimler brand), MAN heavy- and medium-duty trucks and buses (a VW Group brand), and Dennis Eagle refuse collection vehicles, together with associated parts, across Australia, New Zealand, and portions of the Pacific. In most of these same markets, we are also a leading distributor of diesel and gas engines and power systems, principally representing MTU (a Rolls-Royce solution), Detroit Diesel, Allison Transmission, and Bergen Engines. Penske Australia offers products across the on- and off-highway markets, including in the trucking, mining, power generation, defense, marine, rail, and construction sectors and supports full parts and aftersales service through a network of branches, field service locations, and dealers across the region. These businesses represented 2.1% of our total revenues and 3.4% of our total gross profit in 2023.

Penske Transportation Solutions. We hold a 28.9% ownership interest in Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. ("PTL"). PTL is owned 41.1% by Penske Corporation, 28.9% by us, and 30.0% by Mitsui & Co., Ltd. ("Mitsui"). We account for our investment in PTL under the equity method, and we therefore record our share of PTL's earnings on our statements of income under the caption "Equity in earnings of affiliates," which also includes the results of our other equity method investments. Penske Transportation Solutions ("PTS") is the universal brand name for PTL's various business lines through which it is capable of meeting customers' needs across the supply chain with a broad product offering that includes full-service truck leasing, truck rental, and contract maintenance along with logistics services, such as dedicated contract carriage, distribution center management, freight management, and dry van truckload carrier services. We recorded $289.5 million in equity earnings from this investment in 2023.

Outlook

Please see “Outlook” in Part I, Item 1 for a discussion of our outlook in our markets.

Operating Overview

Automotive and commercial truck dealerships represent over 95% and 75% of our revenue and our earnings before taxes, respectively. Income from our PTS investment represents approximately 20% of our earnings before taxes. New and used vehicle revenues typically include sales to retail customers, agency customers, fleet customers, and leasing companies providing consumer leasing. We generate finance and insurance revenues from sales of third-party extended service contracts, sales of third-party insurance policies, commissions relating to the sale of finance and lease contracts to third parties, and the sales of certain other products. Service and parts revenues include fees paid by customers for repair, maintenance and collision services, and the sale of replacement parts and other aftermarket accessories as well as warranty repairs that are reimbursed directly by various vehicle manufacturers.

Our gross profit tends to vary with the mix of revenues we derive from the sale of new vehicles, used vehicles, finance and insurance products, and service and parts transactions. Our gross profit varies across product lines with vehicle sales usually resulting in lower gross profit margins and our other revenues resulting in higher gross profit margins. Factors such as inventory and vehicle availability, customer demand, consumer confidence, unemployment, general economic conditions, seasonality, weather, credit availability, fuel prices, and manufacturers' advertising and incentives also impact the mix of our revenues and therefore, influence our gross profit margin. The results of our commercial vehicle distribution and other business in Australia and New Zealand are principally driven by the number and types of products and vehicles

34

Table of Contents

ordered by our customers. Aggregate revenue and gross profit increased $1,712.6 million, or 6.2%, and $95.0 million, or 2.0%, respectively, during 2023 compared to 2022.

As exchange rates fluctuate, our revenue and results of operations as reported in U.S. Dollars fluctuate. For example, if the British Pound were to weaken against the U.S. Dollar, our U.K. results of operations would translate into less U.S. Dollar reported results. Foreign currency average rate fluctuations decreased revenue and gross profit by $3.9 million and $6.2 million, respectively, in 2023. Foreign currency average rate fluctuations decreased earnings per share from continuing operations by approximately $0.11 per share in 2023. Excluding the impact of foreign currency average rate fluctuations, aggregate revenue and gross profit increased 6.2% and 2.1%, respectively, in 2023.

Our selling expenses consist of advertising and compensation for sales personnel, including commissions and related bonuses. General and administrative expenses include compensation for administration, finance, legal and general management personnel, rent, insurance, utilities, and other expenses. As the majority of our selling expenses are variable and a significant portion of our general and administrative expenses are subject to our control, we believe our expenses can be adjusted over time to reflect economic trends.

Equity in earnings of affiliates principally represents our share of the earnings from PTS, along with our investments in joint ventures and other non-consolidated investments.

Floor plan interest expense relates to financing incurred in connection with the acquisition of new and used vehicle inventories that are secured by those vehicles. Other interest expense consists of interest charges on all of our interest-bearing debt, other than interest relating to floor plan financing. The cost of our variable rate indebtedness is based on the prime rate, the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR"), the Sterling Overnight Index Average ("SONIA"), the Bank of England Base Rate, the Finance House Base Rate, the Euro Interbank Offered Rate, the Canadian Prime Rate, the Tokyo Interbank Offered Rate, the Australian Bank Bill Swap Rate, and the New Zealand Bank Bill Benchmark Rate.

The future success of our business is dependent upon, among other things, macro-economic, geo-political, and industry conditions and events, including their impact on new and used vehicle sales, the availability of consumer credit, changes in consumer demand, consumer confidence levels, fuel prices, demand for trucks to move freight with respect to PTS and PTG, personal discretionary spending levels, interest rates, and unemployment rates; our ability to obtain vehicles and parts from our manufacturers, especially in light of supply chain disruptions due to natural disasters, the shortage of vehicle components, the war in Ukraine, challenges in sourcing labor or labor strikes or work stoppages, or other disruptions; changes in the retail model either from direct sales by manufacturers, a transition to an agency model of sales, sales by online competitors, or from the expansion of electric vehicles; the effects of a pandemic on the global economy, including our ability to react effectively to changing business conditions in light of any pandemic; the rate of inflation, including its impact on vehicle affordability; changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates; our ability to consummate, integrate, and realize returns on acquisitions; with respect to PTS, changes in the financial health of its customers, labor strikes, or work stoppages by its employees, a reduction in PTS' asset utilization rates, continued availability from truck manufacturers and suppliers of vehicles and parts for its fleet, changes in values of used trucks which affects PTS' profitability on truck sales and regulatory risks and related compliance costs; our ability to realize returns on our significant capital investments in new and upgraded dealership facilities; our ability to navigate a rapidly changing automotive and truck landscape; our ability to respond to new or enhanced regulations in both our domestic and international markets relating to dealerships and vehicles sales, including those related to the sales process or emissions standards, as well as changes in consumer sentiment relating to commercial truck sales that may hinder our or PTS' ability to maintain, acquire, sell, or operate trucks; the success of our distribution of commercial vehicles, engines, and power systems; natural disasters; recall initiatives or other disruptions that interrupt the supply of vehicles or parts to us; the outcome of legal and administrative matters, and other factors over which management has limited control. See Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors above and "Forward-Looking Statements" below.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the application of accounting policies that often involve making estimates and employing judgments. Such judgments influence the assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses recognized in our financial statements. Management, on an ongoing basis, reviews these estimates and assumptions. Management may determine that modifications in assumptions and estimates are required, which may result in a material change in our results of operations or financial position.

The following are the accounting policies applied in the preparation of our financial statements that management believes are most dependent upon the use of estimates and assumptions.

35

Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition

Dealership Vehicle, Parts, and Service Sales. We record revenue for vehicle sales at a point in time when vehicles are delivered, which is when the transfer of title, risks and rewards of ownership, and control are considered passed to the customer. For dealerships operating under a franchise model, the amount of consideration we receive for vehicle sales is stated within the executed contract with our customer and is reduced by any non-cash consideration representing the fair value of trade-in vehicles, if applicable. We record revenue for vehicle service and collision work over time as work is completed and when parts are delivered to our customers. Sales promotions that we offer to customers are accounted for as a reduction of revenues at the time of sale. Rebates and other incentives offered directly to us by manufacturers are recognized as a reduction of cost of sales. Reimbursements of qualified advertising expenses are treated as a reduction of selling, general, and administrative expenses. The amounts received under certain manufacturer rebate and incentive programs are based on the attainment of program objectives, and such earnings are recognized either upon the sale of the vehicle for which the award was received or upon attainment of the particular program goals if not associated with individual vehicles. Taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are recorded on a net basis (excluded from revenue). During 2023, 2022, and 2021, we earned $611.8 million, $571.1 million, and $635.7 million, respectively, of rebates, incentives, and reimbursements from manufacturers, of which $593.8 million, $554.6 million, and $620.3 million, respectively, was recorded as a reduction of cost of sales. The remaining $18.0 million, $16.5 million, and $15.4 million was recorded as a reduction of selling, general, and administrative expenses during 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively.

Dealership Finance and Insurance Sales. Subsequent to the sale of a vehicle to a customer, we sell installment sale contracts to various financial institutions on a non-recourse basis (with specified exceptions) to mitigate the risk of default. We receive a commission from the lender equal to either the difference between the interest rate charged to the customer and the interest rate set by the financing institution or a flat fee. We also receive commissions for facilitating the sale of various products to customers, including guaranteed vehicle protection insurance, vehicle theft protection, and extended service contracts. These commissions are recorded as revenue at a point in time when the customer enters into the contract. Payment is typically due and collected within 30 days subsequent to the execution of the contract with the customer. In the case of finance contracts, a customer may prepay or fail to pay their contract, thereby terminating the contract. Customers may also terminate extended service contracts and other insurance products, which are fully paid at purchase, and become eligible for refunds of unused premiums. In these circumstances, a portion of the commissions we received may be charged back based on the terms of the contracts. The revenue we record relating to these transactions is net of an estimate of the amount of chargebacks we will be required to pay. Our estimate is based upon our historical experience with similar contracts, including the impact of refinance and default rates on retail finance contracts and cancellation rates on extended service contracts and other insurance products. Aggregate reserves relating to chargeback activity were $42.7 million and $38.4 million as of December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022, respectively.

Commercial Vehicle Distribution and Other. We record revenue from the distribution of vehicles, engines, and other products at a point in time when delivered, which is when the transfer of title, risks and rewards of ownership, and control are considered passed to the customer. We record revenue for service or repair work over time as work is completed and when parts are delivered to our customers. For our long-term power generation contracts, we record revenue over time as services are provided in accordance with contract milestones.

Refer to the disclosures provided in Part II, Item 8, Note 2 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional detail on revenue recognition.

Impairment Testing

Other indefinite-lived intangible assets are assessed for impairment annually on October 1 and upon the occurrence of an indicator of impairment through a comparison of its fair value to its carrying value. These indefinite-lived intangible assets relate to franchise agreements with manufacturers and distributors, which represent the estimated value of franchises acquired in business combinations, and distribution agreements with commercial vehicle manufacturers and other manufacturers, which represent the estimated value for distribution rights acquired in business combinations. An indicator of impairment exists if the carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value, and an impairment loss may be recognized up to that excess. The fair value is determined using an income approach, which includes assumptions about revenue growth, terminal growth rates, and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“EBITDA”) margins, and the selection of the weighted average cost of capital. Changes in these assumptions could have a significant effect on the fair value of these intangible assets and the amount of any impairment charge. Each of the significant assumptions to the fair value model are considered level 3 inputs within the fair value hierarchy. We also evaluate in connection with the annual

36

Table of Contents

impairment testing whether events and circumstances continue to support our assessment that the other indefinite-lived intangible assets continue to have an indefinite life.

Goodwill impairment is assessed at the reporting unit level annually on October 1 and upon the occurrence of an indicator of impairment. Our operations are organized by management into operating segments by line of business and geography. We have determined that we have four reportable segments as defined in generally accepted accounting principles for segment reporting: (i) Retail Automotive, consisting of our retail automotive dealership operations; (ii) Retail Commercial Truck, consisting of our retail commercial truck dealership operations in the U.S. and Canada; (iii) Other, consisting of our commercial vehicle and power systems distribution operations; and (iv) Non-Automotive Investments, consisting of our equity method investments in non-automotive operations which includes our investment in PTS and other various investments. We have determined that the dealerships in each of our operating segments within the Retail Automotive reportable segment are components that were aggregated into six reporting units for the purpose of goodwill impairment testing as of October 1, 2023, as they (A) have similar economic characteristics (all are automotive dealerships having similar margins), (B) offer similar products and services (all sell new and/or used vehicles, service, parts, and third-party finance and insurance products), (C) have similar target markets and customers (generally individuals), and (D) have similar distribution and marketing practices (all distribute products and services through dealership facilities that market to customers in similar fashions). The reporting units were Eastern, Central, and Western United States, Used Vehicle Dealerships United States, International, and Used Vehicle Dealerships International. Our Retail Commercial Truck reportable segment has been determined to represent one operating segment and reporting unit. The goodwill included in our Other reportable segment relates primarily to our commercial vehicle distribution operating segment. There is no goodwill recorded in our Non-Automotive Investments reportable segment.

For reporting units within our Retail Automotive, Retail Commercial Truck, and Other reportable segments, we prepared a quantitative assessment of the carrying value of goodwill. We estimated the fair value of our reporting units using an income approach. The income approach measures fair value by discounting expected future cash flows at a weighted average cost of capital. We also validate the fair value for each reporting unit using the income approach by calculating a cash earnings multiple and determining whether the multiple was reasonable compared to recent market transactions completed by the Company or in the industry. As part of that assessment, we also reconcile the estimated aggregate fair values of our reporting units to our market capitalization. We believe this reconciliation process is consistent with a market participant perspective. This consideration would also include a control premium that represents the estimated amount an investor would pay for our equity securities to obtain a controlling interest and other significant assumptions, including revenue growth, terminal growth rates, EBITDA margin, and the weighted average cost of capital.

Based on our assessment as of October 1, 2023, and in conjunction with our fourth quarter annual forecasting process for 2024 which impacts key assumptions used in our goodwill impairment assessment, we determined the carrying value of goodwill related our Used Vehicle Dealerships International reporting unit was greater than the fair value of the reporting unit. As a result, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $40.7 million to reduce the carrying value to fair value.

During 2023, we implemented, and are continuing to implement, certain managerial and financial reporting changes further integrating operations within our Retail Automotive reportable segment. This integration involved realigning management roles, consolidating administrative functions, and system conversions, among other measures. As a result of these changes and subsequent to our goodwill impairment assessment as of October 1, 2023, we determined that the dealerships in each of our operating segments within the Retail Automotive reportable segment are components that are aggregated into two reporting units: United States Retail Automotive and International Retail Automotive. As such, we reassigned our U.S. East, U.S. Central, U.S. West, and Used Vehicle Dealerships U.S. reporting units to the United States Retail Automotive reporting unit and our Used Vehicle Dealerships International reporting unit to the International Retail Automotive reporting unit. We reviewed the quantitative and qualitative factors associated with the change in reporting units and determined that the reassigned reporting units had no indicators of impairment at the time of the reporting unit change and reassignment of goodwill. As of December 31, 2023, we have four reporting units: United States Retail Automotive, International Retail Automotive, Retail Commercial Truck, and Commercial Vehicle and Power Systems Distribution.

Investments

We account for each of our investments under the equity method, pursuant to which we record our proportionate share of the investee's income each period. The net book value of our investments was $1,774.9 million and $1,636.9 million as of December 31, 2023, and 2022, respectively, including $1,725.1 million and $1,590.9 million relating to PTS as of December 31, 2023, and 2022, respectively. We currently hold a 28.9% ownership interest in PTS.

37

Table of Contents

Investments for which there is not a liquid, actively traded market are reviewed periodically by management for indicators of impairment. If an indicator of impairment is identified, management estimates the fair value of the investment using a discounted cash flow approach, which includes assumptions relating to revenue and profitability growth, profit margins, residual values, and our cost of capital. Declines in investment values that are deemed to be other than temporary may result in an impairment charge reducing the investments' carrying value to fair value.

Income Taxes

Tax regulations may require items to be included in our tax return at different times than when those items are reflected in our financial statements. Some of the differences are permanent, such as expenses that are not deductible on our tax return, and some are temporary differences, such as the timing of depreciation expense. Temporary differences create deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets generally represent items that will be used as a tax deduction or credit in our tax return in future years which we have already recorded in our financial statements. Deferred tax liabilities generally represent deductions taken on our tax return that have not yet been recognized as an expense in our financial statements. We establish valuation allowances for our deferred tax assets if the amount of expected future taxable income is not more likely than not to allow for the use of the deduction or credit.

Refer to the disclosures provided in Part II, Item 8, Note 16 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional detail on our accounting for income taxes.

Leases

We determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Our operating leases primarily consist of land and facilities, including certain dealerships and office space. We also have equipment leases that primarily relate to office and computer equipment, service and shop equipment, company vehicles, and other miscellaneous items. We do not have any material leases, individually or in the aggregate, classified as a finance leasing arrangement.

Operating leases are included in “operating lease right-of-use assets,” “accrued expenses and other current liabilities,” and “long-term operating lease liabilities” on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Operating lease right-of-use assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. Our property leases are generally for an initial period between 5 and 20 years and are typically structured to include renewal options at our election. We include renewal options that we are reasonably certain to exercise in the measurement of our lease liabilities and right-of-use assets. As the rate implicit in the lease is generally not readily determinable for our operating leases, the discount rates used to determine the present value of our lease liability are based on our incremental borrowing rate at the lease commencement date and commensurate with the remaining lease term. Our incremental borrowing rate for a lease is the rate of interest we would have to pay to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term for an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Refer to the disclosures provided in Part II, Item 8, Note 3 and Note 11 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of our operating leases.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Please see the disclosures provided under “Recent Accounting Pronouncements” in Part II, Item 8, Note 1 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements set forth below which are incorporated by reference herein.

Tax Developments

Global Minimum Tax

The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”), an international association of thirty-eight countries including the United States, has proposed reform of international taxation known as Pillar Two, which imposes a global minimum corporate income tax rate of 15% on multinational companies. In December 2022, the European Union (“EU”) Member States formally adopted a directive that implements the OECD Pillar Two framework, which is expected to be enacted into the national laws of the EU member states. Certain countries in which we operate have enacted legislation to adopt the Pillar Two framework and several other countries are also considering changes to their local tax laws to implement this framework. The Pillar Two legislation is anticipated to be effective for the Company for the calendar year beginning January 1, 2024. When and how this framework is adopted or enacted by the various countries in which we do business could increase tax compliance obligations although we do not anticipate any monetary impact from

38

Table of Contents

any Pillar Two legislation as all of the jurisdictions in which PAG operates are expected to have an effective tax rate greater than the minimum threshold of 15%. We will continue to monitor new guidance in this area including proposed and enacted legislative changes as further information becomes available.

Results of Operations

The following tables present comparative financial data relating to our operating performance in the aggregate and on a "same-store" basis. Dealership results are included in same-store comparisons when we have consolidated the acquired entity during the entirety of both periods being compared. As an example, if a dealership were acquired on January 15, 2021, the results of the acquired entity would be included in annual same-store comparisons beginning with the year ended December 31, 2023, and in quarterly same-store comparisons beginning with the quarter ended June 30, 2022.

Beginning in 2023, we transitioned our Mercedes-Benz U.K. dealerships to an agency model under which these dealerships, and a limited number of our other dealerships in Europe, receive a fee for facilitating the sale by the manufacturer of a new vehicle but do not hold the vehicle in inventory. Vehicles sold under this agency model are counted as new agency units sold instead of new retail units sold by us, and only the fee we receive from the manufacturer, not the price of the vehicle, is reported as new revenue (as opposed to previously recording all of the vehicle sale price as new revenue) with no corresponding cost of sale. We continue to provide new vehicle customer service under the agency model, and the Mercedes-Benz U.K. agency model at this time has not changed our used vehicle sales operations or service and parts operations, although the long-term impact of the agency model at these dealerships as well as other agency models proposed by our manufacturer partners is uncertain. As a result of the foregoing, we have presented below units sold under this agency model as "Agency units" beginning in 2023. Moreover, our retail automotive revenue per unit retailed and related gross profit per unit retailed for new vehicles excludes agency unit sales and associated revenue.

As discussed above, the results for 2023 include a goodwill impairment charge of $40.7 million (before and after tax), or $0.60 per share, relating to our Used Vehicle Dealerships International reporting unit.

For the discussion and analysis comparing the results of operations for 2021 to 2022, we refer you to Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the 2022 Form 10-K filed on February 21, 2023.

39

Table of Contents

Retail Automotive Dealership New Vehicle Data

(In millions, except unit and perunit amounts)

Same-store new agency unit sales 27,563 — 27,563 nm — — — nm

nm – not meaningful

Retail Units (Excluding Agency Sales)

Retail unit sales of new vehicles increased from 2022 to 2023 due to an 11,336 unit, or 6.3%, increase in same-store new retail unit sales, partially offset by the transition to the agency model for certain brands in Europe which are not included as retail unit sales beginning in 2023. Same-store retail units increased 7.9% in the U.S. and increased 3.4% internationally. Overall, new retail unit sales increased 8.1% in the U.S. and increased 2.3% internationally. We believe the increase in same-store retail unit sales is primarily due to continued consumer demand for new vehicles and increasing new vehicle availability, coupled with the pent-up demand resulting from lower vehicle availability in prior years.

Revenues

New vehicle sales revenue increased from 2022 to 2023 due to a $1,181.0 million, or 12.1%, increase in same-store revenues and a $41.8 million increase from net dealership acquisitions, partially offset by the transition to agency for certain brands in Europe causing us to no longer record the vehicle sales price as revenue. Excluding $22.1 million of favorable foreign currency fluctuations, same-store new revenue increased 11.9%. Same-store revenue (excluding agency) increased due to the increase in same-store new retail unit sales, which increased revenue by $646.3 million, coupled with a $2,668 per unit increase in same-store comparative average retail selling price (including a $109 per retail unit increase attributable to favorable foreign currency fluctuations), which increased revenue by $479.4 million. We believe the increase in same-store comparative average retail selling price (excluding agency) is primarily due to inflation, the continued low supply of certain new vehicle brands available for sale, and the mix of products sold.

Gross Profit

Retail gross profit from new vehicle sales decreased from 2022 to 2023 due to a $19.3 million, or 1.6%, decrease in same-store gross profit, partially attributable to the transition to agency for certain brands in Europe, and partially offset by

40

Table of Contents

an $11.7 million increase from net dealership acquisitions. Excluding $1.7 million of favorable foreign currency fluctuations, same-store gross profit decreased 1.7%. Same-store gross profit (excluding agency) decreased due to a $762 per unit decrease in same-store comparative average gross profit (despite a $4 per retail unit increase attributable to favorable foreign currency fluctuations), which decreased gross profit by $136.9 million, partially offset by the increase in same-store new retail sales, which increased retail gross profit by $68.3 million. We believe the decrease in same-store comparative average retail gross profit per unit (excluding agency) is primarily due to an improved supply of many of the new vehicles we sell and the mix of sales as compared to the prior year period. We believe the resulting compression on gross margin is due to higher gross profit realized in the prior year as vehicle supply was constrained, coupled with higher financing costs and inflation.

Retail Automotive Dealership Used Vehicle Data

(In millions, except unit and per unit amounts)

Units

Retail unit sales of used vehicles decreased from 2022 to 2023 due to a 7,351 unit, or 2.9%, decrease in same-store used retail unit sales, partially offset by a 2,333 unit increase from net dealership acquisitions. Our same-store units decreased 7.3% in the U.S. and increased 1.0% internationally.Overall, our used units decreased 7.6% in the U.S. and increased 3.0% internationally. We believe the decrease in same-store unit sales is primarily being impacted by a lower supply of 1-4 year old used vehicles due to the fewer number of new vehicles sold in recent years, lower lease returns in the U.S., higher interest rates and inflation impacting the affordability of used vehicles.

Revenues

Used vehicle retail sales revenue decreased from 2022 to 2023 due to a $213.1 million, or 2.4%, decrease in same-store revenues, partially offset by a $121.0 million increase from net dealership acquisitions. Excluding $10.7 million of favorable foreign currency fluctuations, same-store used retail revenue decreased 2.6%. The decrease in same-store revenue is due to the decrease in same-store used retail unit sales, which decreased revenue by $254.5 million, partially offset by a $169 per unit increase in same-store comparative average selling price (including a $44 per unit increase attributable to favorable foreign currency fluctuations), which increased revenue by $41.4 million. We believe the increase in same-store comparative average selling price is primarily due to the increased cost to acquire used vehicles for retail sales as compared to the prior year period and the mix of sales as compared to the prior year period.

41

Table of Contents

Gross Profit

Retail gross profit from used vehicle sales decreased from 2022 to 2023 due to a $114.3 million, or 21.5%, decrease in same-store gross profit, partially offset by a $3.6 million increase from net dealership acquisitions. The decrease in same-store gross profit is due to a $403 per unit decrease in same-store comparative average gross profit (including a $6 per unit decrease attributable to unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations), which decreased gross profit by $98.8 million, coupled with the decrease in same-store used retail unit sales, which decreased gross profit by $15.5 million. We believe the decrease in same-store comparative average gross profit per unit is primarily due to the increased cost to acquire used vehicles, coupled with consumer affordability challenges from higher prices and higher financing costs. Higher vehicle prices are attributable to a lower supply of late model 0-4 year old vehicles as lower new unit sales and lower leasing rates in prior periods impacted the availability of inventory.

Retail Automotive Dealership Finance and Insurance Data

(In millions, except unit and perunit amounts)

Total agency unit sales 32,672 — 32,672 nm — — — nm

Total same-store agency unit sales 27,563 — 27,563 nm — — — nm

nm – not meaningful

Finance and insurance revenue decreased from 2022 to 2023 due to a $16.7 million, or 2.0%, decrease in same-store revenue, partially offset by a $7.2 million increase from net dealership acquisitions. Excluding $1.1 million of favorable foreign currency fluctuations, same-store finance and insurance revenue decreased 2.2%. Same-store revenue (excluding agency) decreased due to a $57 per unit decrease in same-store comparative average finance and insurance retail revenue (despite a $3 per retail unit increase attributable to favorable foreign currency fluctuations), which decreased revenue by $24.6 million, partially offset by the increase in combined same-store new and used retail unit sales, which increased revenue by $7.4 million. Same-store finance and insurance revenue per unit (excluding agency) decreased 4.6% in the U.S. and increased 0.3% in the U.K. We believe the aggregate decrease in same-store finance and insurance revenue per unit (excluding agency) is primarily due to rising interest rates impacting overall customer affordability, coupled with an increase in lease penetration which limits our finance and insurance product sale opportunities.

42

Table of Contents

Retail Automotive Dealership Service and Parts Data

(In millions)

Revenues

Service and parts revenue increased from 2022 to 2023, with an increase of 8.2% in the U.S. and an increase of 21.5% internationally. The increase in service and parts revenue is due to a $220.2 million, or 9.4%, increase in same-store revenues, coupled with an $87.4 million increase from net dealership acquisitions. Excluding $4.9 million of favorable foreign currency fluctuations, same-store revenue increased 9.2%. The increase in same-store revenue is due to a $155.5 million, or 9.0%, increase in customer pay revenue, a $41.0 million, or 8.6%, increase in warranty revenue, and a $23.7 million, or 15.4%, increase in vehicle preparation and body shop revenue. We believe the increase in same-store revenue is primarily due to vehicles remaining on the road longer due to affordability considerations, as well as increases in effective labor rates, the retail cost of parts due to inflation, and recalls.

Gross Profit

Service and parts gross profit increased from 2022 to 2023 due to a $123.8 million, or 8.9%, increase in same-store gross profit, coupled with a $42.5 million increase from net dealership acquisitions. Excluding $2.6 million of favorable foreign currency fluctuations, same-store gross profit increased 8.7%. The increase in same-store gross profit is primarily driven by the increase in same-store revenues, which increased gross profit by $130.4 million, partially offset by a 0.3% decrease in same-store gross margin, which decreased gross profit by $6.6 million. The increase in same-store gross profit is due to a $75.2 million, or 9.1%, increase in customer pay gross profit, a $30.2 million, or 9.8%, increase in vehicle preparation and body shop gross profit, and an $18.4 million, or 7.0%, increase in warranty gross profit.

43

Table of Contents

Retail Commercial Truck Dealership Data

(In millions, except unit and per unit amounts)

Units

Retail unit sales of new trucks increased from 2022 to 2023 due to a 542 unit increase from net dealership acquisitions, partially offset by a 232 unit, or 1.3%, decrease in same-store new retail unit sales. We believe the decrease in same-store unit sales is primarily due to the unusually high number of deliveries in the prior year from production timing and delivery delays in 2021 caused by manufacturer supply chain challenges, partially offset by replacement demand for medium- and heavy-duty trucks.

Revenues

New commercial truck retail sales revenue increased from 2022 to 2023 due to an $86.4 million increase from net dealership acquisitions, coupled with an $85.1 million, or 3.8%, increase in same-store revenues. The increase in same-store revenue is due to a $6,780 per unit increase in same-store comparative average selling price, which increased revenue by $115.2 million, partially offset by the decrease in same-store new retail unit sales, which decreased revenue by $30.1 million. We believe the increase in same-store comparative average selling price is primarily due to higher prices driven by replacement demand, surcharges initiated by the manufacturer, and the mix of units sold.

44

Table of Contents

Gross Profit

New commercial truck retail gross profit increased from 2022 to 2023 due to a $12.9 million, or 10.7%, increase in same-store gross profit, coupled with an $8.9 million increase from net dealership acquisitions. The increase in same-store gross profit is due to an $859 per unit increase in same-store comparative average gross profit, which increased gross profit by $14.6 million, partially offset by the decrease in same-store new retail unit sales, which decreased gross profit by $1.7 million. We believe the increase in same-store comparative average gross profit per unit is primarily due to sales mix of retail units and higher selling prices.

Units

Retail unit sales of used trucks increased from 2022 to 2023 due to a 416 unit, or 15.8%, increase in same-store retail unit sales, coupled with a 53 unit increase from net dealership acquisitions. We believe the increase in same-store unit sales is primarily due to the increase in availability and affordability of used trucks as a result of lower freight rates when compared with the prior year period.

Revenues

Used commercial truck retail sales revenue decreased from 2022 to 2023 due to a $74.1 million, or 24.8%, decrease in same-store revenues, partially offset by a $2.7 million increase from net dealership acquisitions. The decrease in same-store revenue is due to a $39,823 per unit decrease in same-store comparative average selling price, which decreased revenue by $104.7 million, partially offset by the increase in same-store used retail unit sales, which increased revenue by $30.6 million. We believe the decrease in same-store comparative average selling price is primarily due to the declining value of used trucks, including as a result of depressed freight spot rates when compared to the prior year period, as well as the increased supply of new truck inventory for sale.

45

Table of Contents

Gross Profit

Used commercial truck retail gross profit decreased from 2022 to 2023 primarily due to a $2.1 million, or 9.7%, decrease in same-store gross profit. The decrease in same-store gross profit is due to a $1,812 per unit decrease in same-store comparative average gross profit, which decreased gross profit by $4.8 million, partially offset by the increase in same-store used retail unit sales, which increased gross profit by $2.7 million. We believe the decrease in same-store comparative average gross profit per unit is primarily due to the decreased value of used trucks over prior year, as a result of depressed freight spot rates when compared to the prior year period, as well as the increased supply of new truck inventory for sale.

Revenues

Service and parts revenue increased from 2022 to 2023 due to a $33.5 million increase from net dealership acquisitions, coupled with a $21.6 million, or 2.7%, increase in same-store revenues. Customer pay work represented approximately 79.8% of PTG's service and parts revenue, largely due to the significant amount of retail sales of parts and accessories. The increase in same-store revenue is due to a $13.8 million, or 10.9%, increase in warranty revenue, a $6.7 million, or 1.0%, increase in customer pay revenue, and a $1.1 million, or 3.7%, increase in body shop revenue. We believe the increase in same-store service and parts revenue is being driven by the prolonged replacement cycle of trucks from supply shortages and increased mileage accumulation across existing fleets.

Gross Profit

Service and parts gross profit increased from 2022 to 2023 due to a $13.9 million increase from net dealership acquisitions, coupled with a $9.2 million, or 2.7%, increase in same-store gross profit. The increase in same-store gross profit is due to the increase in same-store revenues, which increased gross profit by $9.2 million. The increase in same-store gross profit is due to a $5.7 million, or 8.0%, increase in warranty gross profit, a $2.2 million, or 0.9%, increase in customer pay gross profit, and a $1.3 million, or 4.6%, increase in body shop gross profit.

Commercial Vehicle Distribution and Other Data

(In millions, except unit amounts)

Penske Australia primarily distributes and services commercial vehicles, engines, and power systems. This business generated $634.0 million of revenue during 2023 compared to $578.8 million of revenue during 2022, an increase of 9.5%. This business also generated $165.2 million of gross profit during 2023 compared to $157.3 million of gross profit during 2022, an increase of 5.0%.

46

Table of Contents

Excluding $27.2 million of unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations, revenue increased 14.2% primarily due to an increase in service and parts sales revenue, partially offset by a decrease in unit sales. Excluding $7.4 million of unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations, gross profit increased 9.7% primarily due to an increase in higher margin remanufacturing activity and higher margin service and parts sales.

Selling, General, and Administrative Data

(In millions)

Selling, general, and administrative expenses ("SG&A") increased from 2022 to 2023 due to a $106.0 million, or 3.4%, increase in same-store SG&A, coupled with a $70.9 million increase from net acquisitions. Excluding $1.2 million of unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations, same-store SG&A increased 3.4%. We believe the increase in SG&A as a percentage of gross profit is primarily due to increases in customer service vehicle loaner expenses, advertising, rent, information technology expenses, and utility costs.

SG&A expenses as a percentage of total revenue were 11.5% in 2023 and 11.6% each year in 2022 and 2021 and as a percentage of gross profit were 68.9%, 66.6%, and 66.7%, in 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively.

Depreciation

(In millions)

Depreciation increased from 2022 to 2023 due to an $11.7 million, or 9.4%, increase in same-store depreciation due to capital expenditures, coupled with a $2.0 million increase from net dealership acquisitions.

47

Table of Contents

Floor Plan Interest Expense

(In millions)

Floor plan interest expense increased from 2022 to 2023 due to a $78.0 million, or 152.9%, increase in same-store floor plan interest expense, coupled with a $2.7 million increase from net acquisitions. The overall increase is due to increases in applicable rates, coupled with increases in average amounts outstanding under floor plan arrangements due to increasing levels of inventory.

Other Interest Expense

(In millions)

Other interest expense increased from 2022 to 2023 due to increases in applicable rates, coupled with increases in average revolver borrowing amounts outstanding under our credit agreements.

Equity in Earnings of Affiliates

(In millions)

Equity in earnings of affiliates decreased from 2022 to 2023 due to a $200.5 million, or 40.9%, decrease in earnings from our investment in PTS, partially offset by the increase in earnings from our retail automotive joint ventures. We believe the decrease in our PTS equity earnings is primarily due to a decrease in commercial and consumer rental utilization and a $211 million decrease in gains from the sale of vehicles, coupled with an increase of $213 million in interest costs and an increase of $150 million in maintenance costs when compared to the same period last year, representing $61.0 million, $61.6 million, and $43.4 million, respectively, attributable to our 28.9% interest.

Income Taxes

(In millions)

Income taxes decreased from 2022 to 2023 primarily due to a $439.7 million decrease in our pre-tax income compared to the prior year. Our effective tax rate was 25.4% during 2023 compared to 25.4% during 2022 primarily due to fluctuations in our geographic pre-tax income mix, partially offset by an increase to the U.K. corporate tax rate.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash requirements are primarily for working capital, inventory financing, the acquisition of new businesses, the improvement and expansion of existing facilities, the purchase or construction of new facilities, debt service and repayments, dividends, and potential repurchases of our outstanding securities under the program discussed below. Historically, these cash requirements have been met through cash flow from operations, borrowings under our credit agreements and floor plan arrangements, the issuance of debt securities, sale-leaseback transactions, real estate financings, and dividends and distributions from joint venture investments.

48

Table of Contents

We have historically expanded our operations through organic growth and the acquisition of dealerships and other businesses. We believe that cash flow from operations, dividends and distributions from PTS and our joint venture investments, and our existing capital resources, including the liquidity provided by our credit agreements and floor plan financing arrangements, will be sufficient to fund our existing operations and current commitments for at least the next twelve months. In the event that economic conditions are more severely impacted than we expect due to geo-political conditions, any pandemic or vehicle shortages resulting from supply chain difficulties, we pursue significant acquisitions or other expansion opportunities, pursue significant repurchases of our outstanding securities, or refinance or repay existing debt, we may need to raise additional capital either through the public or private issuance of equity or debt securities or through additional borrowings, which sources of funds may not necessarily be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all. In addition, our liquidity could be negatively impacted in the event we fail to comply with the covenants under our various financing and operating agreements or in the event our floor plan financing is withdrawn. Future events, including acquisitions, divestitures, new or revised operating lease agreements, borrowings or repayments under our credit agreements and our floor plan arrangements, raising capital, and purchases or refinancing of our securities, may also impact our liquidity.

We expect that scheduled payments of our debt instruments will be funded through cash flows from operations or borrowings under our credit agreements. In the case of payments upon the maturity or termination dates of our debt instruments, we currently expect to be able to refinance such instruments in the normal course of business or otherwise fund them from cash flows from operations or borrowings under our credit agreements. Refer to the disclosures provided in Part II, Item 8, Note 10 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements set forth below for a detailed description of our long-term debt obligations and scheduled interest payments.

Floor plan notes payable are revolving inventory-secured financing arrangements. Refer to the disclosures provided in Part II, Item 8, Note 9 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a detailed description of financing for the vehicles we purchase, including discussion of our floor plan and other revolving arrangements.

Refer to the disclosures provided in Part II, Item 8, Note 11 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of our off-balance sheet arrangements which includes a repurchase commitment related to our floor plan credit agreement with Daimler Truck Financial Services Australia and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services New Zealand.

As of December 31, 2023, we had $96.4 million of cash available to fund our operations and capital commitments. In addition, we had $1.2 billion, £200.0 million ($254.7 million), CAD $42.0 million ($31.7 million), AU $8.0 million ($5.5 million), and $242.3 million available for borrowing under our U.S. credit agreement, U.K. credit agreement, Canada credit agreement, Australia credit agreement, and the revolving mortgage facility through Toyota Motor Credit Corporation in the U.S., respectively.

Securities Repurchases

From time to time, our Board of Directors has authorized securities repurchase programs pursuant to which we may, as market conditions warrant, purchase our outstanding common stock or debt on the open market, in privately negotiated transactions, via a tender offer, through a pre-arranged trading plan, pursuant to the terms of an accelerated share repurchase program, or by other means. We have historically implemented pre-arranged trading plans as part of our securities repurchase programs. These plans authorize share repurchases based on parameters outlined in the specific plan during periods when we otherwise would not trade in our securities, such as the period approaching the end of a quarter through our public announcement of earnings. We have historically funded any such repurchases using cash flow from operations, borrowings under our U.S. credit agreement, and borrowings under our U.S. floor plan arrangements. The decision to make repurchases will be based on factors such as general economic and industry conditions, the market price of the relevant security versus our view of its intrinsic value, the potential impact of such repurchases on our capital structure, and our consideration of any alternative uses of our capital, such as for acquisitions, dividends, the repayment of our existing indebtedness, and strategic investments in our current businesses, in addition to any then-existing limits imposed by our finance agreements and securities trading policy. As of December 31, 2023, $215.5 million remained outstanding and available for repurchases under our securities repurchase program approved by our Board of Directors. This authority has no expiration. Refer to the disclosures provided in Part II, Item 8, Note 14 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a summary of shares repurchased during 2023.

49

Table of Contents

Dividends

We paid the following cash dividends on our common stock in 2022 and 2023:

Per Share Dividends

First Quarter $ 0.47

Second Quarter $ 0.50

Third Quarter $ 0.53

Fourth Quarter $ 0.57

First Quarter $ 0.61

Second Quarter $ 0.66

Third Quarter $ 0.72

Fourth Quarter $ 0.79

We also announced a cash dividend of $0.87 per share payable on March 1, 2024, to stockholders of record as of February 15, 2024. While future quarterly or other cash dividends will depend upon a variety of factors considered relevant by our Board of Directors, which may include our expectations regarding the severity and duration of vehicle production issues, the rate of inflation, including its impact on vehicle affordability, earnings, cash flow, capital requirements, restrictions relating to any then-existing indebtedness, financial condition, alternative uses of capital, and other factors, we currently expect to continue to pay comparable dividends in the future.

Vehicle Financing

Refer to the disclosures provided in Part II, Item 8, Note 9 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a detailed description of financing for the vehicles we purchase, including discussion of our floor plan and other revolving arrangements.

Long-Term Debt Obligations

As of December 31, 2023, we had the following long-term debt obligations outstanding:

U.S. credit agreement — revolving credit line $ —

U.K. credit agreement — revolving credit line —

Canada credit agreement 81.5

Australia credit agreement 62.7

Mortgage facilities 402.1

Total long-term debt $ 1,629.2

As of December 31, 2023, we were in compliance with all covenants under our credit agreements, and we believe we will remain in compliance with such covenants for the next twelve months. Refer to the disclosures provided in Part II, Item 8, Note 10 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements set forth below for a detailed description of our long-term debt obligations.

50

Table of Contents

Short-Term Borrowings

We have six principal sources of short-term borrowings: the revolving portion of the U.S. credit agreement, the revolving portion of the U.K. credit agreement, our Canada credit agreement, our Australia credit agreement, the revolving mortgage facility through Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, and the floor plan agreements that we utilize to finance our vehicle inventories. We are also able to access availability under the floor plan agreements to fund our cash needs.

During 2023, outstanding revolving commitments varied between $0.0 million and $393.0 million under the U.S. credit agreement, between £0.0 million and £48.0 million ($0.0 million and $61.1 million) under the U.K. credit agreement's revolving credit line, between CAD $0.0 million and CAD $115.0 million ($0.0 million and $86.8 million) under the Canada credit agreement, between AU $30.7 million and AU $100.0 million ($20.9 million and $68.2 million) under the Australia credit agreement, and between $10.0 million and $251.8 million under the revolving mortgage facility through Toyota Motor Credit Corporation in the U.S. The amounts outstanding under our floor plan agreements varied based on the timing of the receipt and expenditure of cash in our operations, driven principally by the levels of our vehicle inventories.

PTS Dividends

We hold a 28.9% ownership interest in PTS as noted above. Their partnership agreement requires PTS, subject to applicable law and the terms of its credit agreements, to make quarterly distributions to the partners with respect to each fiscal year by no later than 45 days after the end of each of the first three quarters of the year and by April 15 of the following year. PTS' partnership agreement and certain of its debt agreements allow partner distributions only as long as it is not in default under those agreements and the amount it pays does not exceed 50% of its consolidated net income, unless its debt-to-equity ratio is less than 3.0 to 1.0, in which case its distributions may not exceed 80% of its consolidated net income. We receive pro rata cash distributions relating to this investment, typically in April, May, August, and November of each year. During 2023, 2022, and 2021, we received $168.8 million, $356.6 million, and $165.5 million, respectively, of pro rata cash distributions relating to this investment. We currently expect to continue to receive future distributions from PTS quarterly, subject to its financial performance.

Sale/Leaseback Arrangements

We have in the past and may in the future enter into sale-leaseback transactions to finance certain property acquisitions and capital expenditures, pursuant to which we sell property and/or leasehold improvements to third parties and agree to lease those assets back for a certain period of time. Such sales generate proceeds that vary from period to period.

Operating Leases

We estimate the total rent obligations under our operating leases, including any extension periods that we are reasonably certain to exercise at our discretion and assuming constant consumer price indices, to be $5.3 billion. As of December 31, 2023, we were in compliance with all financial covenants under these leases consisting principally of leases for dealership and other properties, and we believe we will remain in compliance with such covenants for the next twelve months. Refer to the disclosures provided in Part II, Item 8, Note 3 and Note 11 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of our operating leases.

Discontinued Operations

We had no entities newly classified as held for sale in 2023, 2022, or 2021 that met the criteria to be classified as discontinued operations. As such, results from discontinued operations represent only retail automotive dealerships and our car rental business that were classified as discontinued operations prior to the adoption of ASU No. 2014-08 on January 1, 2015.

Supplemental Guarantor Financial Information

The following is a description of the terms and conditions of the guarantees with respect to senior subordinated notes of Penske Automotive Group, Inc. ("PAG") as the issuer of the 3.50% Notes and the 3.75% Notes (collectively the "Senior Subordinated Notes").

Each of the Senior Subordinated Notes are unsecured, senior subordinated obligations and are guaranteed on an unsecured senior subordinated basis by our 100% owned U.S. subsidiaries ("Guarantor subsidiaries"). Each of the Senior Subordinated Notes also contain customary negative covenants and events of default. If we experience certain "change of

51

Table of Contents

control" events specified in their respective indentures, holders of these Senior Subordinated Notes will have the option to require us to purchase for cash all or a portion of their Senior Subordinated Notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the Senior Subordinated Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, if we make certain asset sales and do not reinvest the proceeds thereof or use such proceeds to repay certain debt, we will be required to use the proceeds of such asset sales to make an offer to purchase the Senior Subordinated Notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Senior Subordinated Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

Guarantor subsidiaries are directly or indirectly 100% owned by PAG, and the guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several. The guarantees may be released under certain circumstances upon resale or transfer by us of the stock of the related guarantor or all or substantially all of the assets of the guarantor to a non-affiliate. Non-wholly owned and foreign subsidiaries of PAG do not guarantee the Senior Subordinated Notes ("Non-Guarantor subsidiaries"). The following tables present summarized financial information for PAG and the Guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis. The financial information of PAG and Guarantor subsidiaries is presented on a combined basis; intercompany balances and transactions between PAG and Guarantor subsidiaries have been eliminated; PAG's or Guarantor subsidiaries' amounts due from, amounts due to, and transactions with non-issuer and Non-Guarantor subsidiaries and related parties are disclosed separately.

Condensed income statement information:

PAG and Guarantor Subsidiaries

Equity in earnings of affiliates 289.5 490.0

Net income attributable to Penske Automotive Group 835.5 1,081.7

Condensed balance sheet information:

PAG and Guarantor Subsidiaries

_______________

(1)Includes $535.1 million and $555.5 million as of December 31, 2023, and 2022, respectively, due from Non-Guarantor subsidiaries.

During the years ended December 31, 2023, and 2022, PAG received $142.9 million and $77.9 million, respectively, from Non-Guarantor subsidiaries.

52

Table of Contents

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes the changes in our cash provided by (used in) operating, investing, and financing activities. The major components of these changes are discussed below.

Year Ended December 31,

Net cash used in continuing investing activities (572.3) (641.7) (623.1)

Net cash used in continuing financing activities (531.1) (798.0) (615.5)

Net cash provided by discontinued operations — — 1.3

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (0.3) (13.5) (3.5)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents $ (10.1) $ 5.8 $ 51.2

Cash Flows from Continuing Operating Activities

Cash flows from continuing operating activities include net income, as adjusted for non-cash items and the effects of changes in working capital.

We finance substantially all of the commercial vehicles we purchase for distribution, new vehicles for retail sale (however, see Item 1A. Risk Factors for a discussion of the agency model of distribution), and a portion of our used vehicle inventories for retail sale under floor plan and other revolving arrangements with various lenders, including the captive finance companies associated with automotive manufacturers. We retain the right to select which, if any, financing source to utilize in connection with the procurement of vehicle inventories. Many vehicle manufacturers provide vehicle financing for the dealers representing their brands; however, it is not a requirement that we utilize this financing. Historically, our floor plan finance source has been based on aggregate pricing considerations.

In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles relating to the statement of cash flows, we report all cash flows arising in connection with floor plan notes payable with the manufacturer of a particular new vehicle as an operating activity in our statement of cash flows, and we report all cash flows arising in connection with floor plan notes payable to a party other than the manufacturer of a particular new vehicle, all floor plan notes payable relating to pre-owned vehicles, and all floor plan notes payable related to our commercial vehicles in Australia and New Zealand as a financing activity in our statement of cash flows. Currently, the majority of our non-trade vehicle financing is with other manufacturer captive lenders. To date, we have not experienced any material limitation with respect to the amount or availability of financing from any institution providing us with vehicle financing.

We believe that changes in aggregate floor plan liabilities are typically linked to changes in vehicle inventory and therefore, are an integral part of understanding changes in our working capital and operating cash flow. As a result, we prepare the following reconciliation to highlight our operating cash flows with all changes in vehicle floor plan being classified as an operating activity for informational purposes:

Year Ended December 31,

Floor plan notes payable — non-trade as reported 46.5 82.9 38.9

Cash Flows from Continuing Investing Activities

Cash flows from continuing investing activities consist primarily of cash used for capital expenditures, proceeds from the sale of dealerships, proceeds from the sale of property and equipment, and net expenditures for acquisitions and other investments. Capital expenditures were $375.3 million, $282.5 million, and $248.9 million during 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively. Capital expenditures relate primarily to improvements to our existing dealership facilities, the construction of new facilities, the acquisition of the property or buildings associated with existing leased facilities, and the acquisition of land for future development. We currently expect to finance our capital expenditures with operating cash flows or borrowings under our credit agreements. We had no proceeds from the sale of dealerships during 2023 compared to

53

Table of Contents

$13.1 million and $4.3 million during 2022 and 2021, respectively. Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment were $30.7 million, $32.3 million, and $54.9 million during 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively. Cash used in acquisitions and other investments, net of cash acquired, was $214.9 million, $393.4 million, and $431.8 million during 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively, and included cash used to repay sellers' floor plan liabilities in such business acquisitions of $24.3 million, $51.3 million, and $43.0 million, respectively.

Cash Flows from Continuing Financing Activities

Cash flows from continuing financing activities include net repayments or borrowings of long-term debt, net borrowings of floor plan notes payable non-trade, repurchases of common stock, dividends, and payments for debt issuance costs.

We had net repayments of long-term debt of $4.3 million and $212.2 million during 2023 and 2021, respectively, and net borrowings of long-term debt of $160.1 million during 2022. We had net borrowings of floor plan notes payable non-trade of $46.5 million, $82.9 million, and $38.9 million during 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively. In 2023, 2022, and 2021, we repurchased 2.6 million, 8.1 million, and 3.1 million shares of common stock under our securities repurchase program for 358.7 million, $869.3 million, and $280.6 million, respectively. In 2023, 2022, and 2021, we acquired 0.17 million, 0.15 million, and 0.15 million shares from employees in connection with a net share settlement feature of employee equity awards for 23.5 million, $17.2 million, and $12.9 million, respectively. We also paid 189.1 million, $154.1 million, and $142.5 million of cash dividends to our stockholders during 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively. We made payments of $2.1 million, $0.3 million, and $6.3 million for debt issuance costs during 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively.

Related Party Transactions

Stockholders Agreement

Several of our directors and officers are affiliated with Penske Corporation or related entities. Roger Penske, our Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, is also Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Penske Corporation and through entities affiliated with Penske Corporation is our largest stockholder owning approximately 51.4% of our outstanding common stock. Mitsui & Co., Ltd. and Mitsui & Co. (USA), Inc. (collectively, "Mitsui") own approximately 19.9% of our outstanding common stock. Mitsui, Penske Corporation and Penske Automotive Holdings Corp. (together with Penske Corporation, the "Penske companies") are parties to a stockholders agreement which expires March 26, 2030. Pursuant to the stockholders agreement, in connection with any shareholder election of directors, the Penske companies agreed to vote their shares for two directors who are representatives of Mitsui as long as Mitsui owns in excess of 20% of our outstanding common stock, and for one director as long as Mitsui owns in excess of 10% of our outstanding common stock. Mitsui agreed to vote its shares for up to fourteen directors voted for by the Penske companies.

Voting Agreement

Penske Corporation (“PC”) and the Company entered into a voting agreement (the “Voting Agreement”) pursuant to which PC agreed, on each matter brought to a vote at any annual or special meeting of our stockholders and in connection with any action proposed to be taken by consent of our stockholders in lieu of a meeting, to vote all shares of Voting Common Stock, or other voting or equity securities of ours which could be issued (together with the Voting Common Stock, the “Voting Securities”) beneficially owned by PC, that, together with the Voting Securities held by Roger S. Penske, our Chair and Chief Executive Officer, and any entity that Roger S. Penske controls, exceed 43.57% of the outstanding Voting Securities (the “Excess Voting Securities”), in the same proportion as all votes cast by stockholders other than PC, Roger S. Penske or any entity that Roger S. Penske controls (except as otherwise required by the existing PM Shareholders Agreement described below). Any Voting Securities that are not Excess Voting Securities may be voted at the discretion of PC. The Voting Agreement will terminate per its terms at the time that PC ceases to beneficially own 30% or more of the Voting Securities then outstanding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Voting Agreement does not impact the provisions of the Stockholders Agreement noted above as currently in effect.

Other Related Party Interests and Transactions

Robert Kurnick, Jr., our President and a director, is also the Vice Chair and a director of Penske Corporation and an Advisory Board member of PTS. Bud Denker, our Executive Vice President, Human Resources, is also the President of Penske Corporation. Greg Penske, the Vice Chair of our Board of Directors, is the son of our Chair and is also a director of Penske Corporation. Michael Eisenson, one of our directors, is also a director of Penske Corporation and an Advisory

54

Table of Contents

Board member of PTS. Lisa Davis, one of our directors, is also an Advisory Board member of PTS. Kota Odagiri, one of our directors, is also an employee of Mitsui & Co.

We sometimes pay to and/or receive fees from Penske Corporation, its subsidiaries, and its affiliates for services rendered in the ordinary course of business or to reimburse payments made to third parties on each other's behalf. These transactions are reviewed periodically by our Audit Committee and reflect the provider's cost or an amount mutually agreed upon by both parties.

We own a 28.9% interest in PTS. PTS, discussed previously, is owned 41.1% by Penske Corporation, 28.9% by us, and 30.0% by Mitsui. The PTS partnership agreement, among other things, provides us with specified partner distribution and governance rights and restricts our ability to transfer our interest. The partnership has an eleven-member Advisory Board. We have the right to appoint one Advisory Board member and appointed Robert H. Kurnick, Jr., our President. Lisa Davis and Michael Eisenson, our directors, are also members of the Advisory Board. We have the right to pro rata quarterly distributions equal to at least 50% of PTS' consolidated net income, as well as specified minority rights which require our and/or Mitsui's consent for certain actions taken by PTS as specified in the PTS partnership agreement. We have also entered into other joint ventures with certain related parties as more fully discussed in Part II, Item 8, Note 12 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Cyclicality

Unit sales of motor vehicles, particularly new vehicles, have been cyclical historically, fluctuating with general economic cycles. During economic downturns, the automotive and truck retailing industries tend to experience periods of decline and recession similar to those experienced by the general economy. We believe that these industries are influenced by general economic conditions and particularly, by consumer confidence, the level of personal discretionary spending, the rate of inflation, including its impact on vehicle affordability, fuel prices, utility prices, interest rates, and credit availability.

Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain) · 10-K for the period ended 2023-12-31, filed 2024-02-16 · accession 0001019849-24-000033

Filing HTML rendered to line-structured narrative text by the shipped reducer (datafeeds.edgar_fulltext.visible_text, keep_table_headers=True): scripts and inline-XBRL headers are dropped, and table content is reduced to its short label cells — numeric table data is not rendered and is therefore not counted. The same rendering is used for every year, so a year-over-year comparison is like for like.

The text is our rendering of the filing, not a facsimile: original pagination, typography and tables are not reproduced, and the numbers live in the financial statements (FA).

The outline locates item HEADINGS in this document. Only Items 1A and 7 have certified boundaries elsewhere in the terminal (the redline and the narrative-overlap number); every span here runs from one heading found to the next heading found.

How the outline was chosen. It is the longest chain of item headings that runs forward through both the document and the standard item order: 19 headings are on that chain and 0 further heading-shaped lines are not — the table-of-contents echo of every item, cross-references and exhibit-list mentions. Each entry's length is measured from its heading to the next heading on the chain.