Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Careful consideration should be given to the following risk factors, together with all other information set forth in this Annual Report, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and in other documents that we file with the SEC, in evaluating Ocugen, Inc. and our subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”, “we”, or “our”) and our business, before investing in our common stock. Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. If any of the following risks and uncertainties actually occurs, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. The market price of our common stock could decline if one or more of these risks or uncertainties were to occur, which may cause you to lose all or part of the money you paid to buy our common stock. The risk factors described below disclose both material and other risks and are not intended to be exhaustive and are not the only risks facing us. New risk factors can emerge from time to time, and it is not possible to predict the impact that any factor or combination of factors may have on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Certain statements below are forward-looking statements. See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in this Annual Report.

Risk Factors Summary

Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. Before deciding whether to invest in our securities, you should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties described in this section of this Annual Report. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:

•We have incurred significant losses and negative cash flows from operations since our inception. We may incur losses over the next several years and may never achieve or maintain profitability. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern absent obtaining significant additional funding.

•We will need substantial additional funding. If we are unable to raise capital when needed, we could be forced to delay, reduce, or eliminate our product development programs or commercialization efforts.

•We will need additional capital in order to enable us to successfully develop our product candidates, and such funding may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Raising additional capital may cause dilution to stockholders, restrict our operations, or require us to relinquish rights to our technologies or product candidates.

•The terms of our Loan and Security Agreement with Avenue Capital Management II, L.P. and the lenders listed therein as well as our loan agreement with EB5 Life Sciences, L.P. require us to meet certain operating covenants and place restrictions on our operating and financial flexibility. If we raise additional capital through debt financing, the terms of any new debt could further restrict our ability to operate our business.

•We are substantially dependent on the success of our product candidates. We cannot guarantee that our product candidates will successfully complete development, receive regulatory approval, or be successfully commercialized.

•Our product candidates generated from our modifier gene therapy platform are based on a novel technology and face an uncertain regulatory environment, which makes it difficult to predict the time and cost of product candidate development and subsequently obtaining regulatory approval.

•If we experience delays or difficulties in the enrollment of patients in clinical trials, our completion of clinical trials and receipt of necessary regulatory approvals could be delayed or prevented.

•We have no prior experience in the marketing, sale, and distribution of biotechnology products and there can be no assurance that our product candidates, if approved, will be successfully commercialized.

•We face significant competition from other pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic institutions, government agencies, and other research organizations. Our operating results will suffer if we fail to compete effectively.

•If third-party payors do not reimburse patients for our products candidates, if approved, or if reimbursement levels are set too low for us to sell our product candidates at a profit, our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates, if approved, and our results of operations will be harmed.

•We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties to conduct, supervise, and monitor our preclinical studies and clinical trials we may initiate, and those third parties may not perform satisfactorily, including failing to meet deadlines for the completion of such trials or failing to comply with regulatory requirements.

•If we encounter difficulties in negotiating commercial manufacturing and supply agreements with third-party manufacturers and suppliers of our product candidates or any product components, our ability to commercialize our product candidates, if approved, would be impaired.

Table of Contents

•If the manufacturers upon whom we rely on fail to produce our product candidates or product components pursuant to the terms of contractual arrangements with us or fail to comply with stringent regulations applicable to biotechnology manufacturers, we may face delays in the development and commercialization of, or be unable to meet demand for, our product candidates, if approved, and may lose potential revenues.

•We may seek to collaborate with third parties for the development or commercialization of our product candidates. We may not be successful in establishing or maintaining collaborative relationships, any of which could adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize our product candidates.

•We may be unable to obtain and maintain patent protection for our technology and product candidates, or the scope of the patent protection obtained may not be sufficiently broad or enforceable, such that our competitors could develop and commercialize technology and products similar or identical to ours, and our ability to successfully commercialize our technology and product candidates may be impaired.

•We may become involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents or other intellectual property, which could be expensive, time-consuming, and unsuccessful.

•Certain aspects of our product candidates are protected by patents exclusively licensed from other companies or institutions. If these licensors terminate their agreements with us or fail to maintain or enforce the underlying patents or licenses thereto, or we otherwise lose our rights to these patents, our competitive position and our market share in the markets for any of our licensed and approved products will be harmed.

•Provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could discourage a takeover that stockholders may consider favorable and may lead to entrenchment of management.

•The trading price of the shares of our common stock could be highly volatile, and purchasers of our common stock could incur substantial losses.

•Our future success depends on our ability to retain key executives and to attract, retain, and motivate qualified personnel.

•We have restated our prior consolidated financial statements, which may lead to additional risks and uncertainties, including loss of investor confidence and negative impacts on our stock price.

•If we fail to maintain proper and effective internal control over financial reporting, our ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements could be impaired, investors may lose confidence in our financial reporting, and the trading price of our common stock may decline.

•The use of new and evolving technologies, such as artificial intelligence, in our business may result in spending material resources and presents risks and challenges that can impact our business including by posing security and other risks to our confidential and/or proprietary information, including personal information, and as a result we may be exposed to reputational harm and liability.

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Capital Requirements

We have incurred significant losses and negative cash flows from operations since our inception. We may incur losses over the next several years and may never achieve or maintain profitability. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern absent obtaining significant additional funding.

Since inception, we have incurred significant net losses and may continue to incur net losses in the future. Our recurring losses from operations raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern for the next 12 months from the date of the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report are issued. As a result, our independent public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph regarding the same in its report on this Annual Report. Substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern may create negative reactions to the price of our common stock and we may have a more difficult time obtaining financing in the future as a result.

We have not generated significant revenue to date and have funded our operations to date through the sale of common stock, warrants to purchase common stock, the issuance of convertible notes and debt, and grant proceeds. We incurred net losses of approximately $54.1 million and $63.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. As of December 31, 2024, we had an accumulated deficit of $340.2 million and a cash balance of $58.5 million. This amount will not meet our capital requirements over the next 12 months. We estimate that our cash and cash equivalents will enable us to fund our operations into the first quarter of 2026. Based on this estimate, we will need to raise significant additional capital in order to fund our future operations. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and our operating and capital requirements may change as a result of many factors currently unknown to us.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient additional capital on acceptable terms or at all. If such additional financing is not available on satisfactory terms, is not available in sufficient amounts, or we do not have sufficient authorized shares, we may be required to delay, limit, or eliminate the development of business opportunities and our ability to achieve our business objectives, our competitiveness, and our business, financial condition, and results of operations will be materially adversely affected. In addition, economic circumstances outside of our control such as a recession or depression and inflation may reduce our ability to access capital, which could negatively affect our liquidity and ability to continue as a going concern. Further, the perception that we may not be able to continue as a going concern may cause others to choose not to do business with us due to concerns about our ability to meet our contractual obligations.

To date, we have not generated any revenues from the sale of products, and absent the realization of sufficient revenues from product sales, if any, of our current or future product candidates, we may never attain profitability in the future. To date, we have devoted substantially all of our financial resources and efforts to research and development, including preclinical and clinical studies. We may continue to incur losses from operations in the next several years as we increase our expenditures in research and development in connection with our ongoing and planned clinical trials and other development and pre-commercialization activities. Even if we obtain a regulatory approval to market a product candidate, our future revenues will depend upon the size of any markets in which our product candidates have received such approval, and our ability to achieve sufficient market acceptance, reimbursement from third-party payors, and adequate market share for our products in those markets.

We anticipate that our expenses will increase in fiscal year 2025 compared to fiscal year 2024 as we continue to conduct clinical activities with respect to our product candidates, including the continuation of several clinical trials for our product candidates, as well as increased headcount, including management personnel to support our research and development, clinical, and business activities, and expanded infrastructure, among other factors.

Due to the inherently unpredictable nature of preclinical and clinical development and the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with such activities, we are unable to predict with any certainty the nature or amounts of the costs we will incur, the timelines we will require in our continued development efforts or the timing, or if we will be able to achieve profitability.

Additionally, our expenses will also increase if, and, as we:

•initiate preclinical studies and clinical trials for any additional product candidates that we may pursue in the future, particularly if there are any delays in enrollment of patients in or completing our clinical trials or the development of our product candidates;

•seek marketing approvals for product candidates that successfully complete clinical development;

•establish sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities for our product candidates for which we obtain a regulatory approval;

Table of Contents

•scale up our manufacturing processes and capabilities to support our clinical trials of our product candidates and commercialization of any of our product candidates for which we obtain a regulatory approval;

•expand our operational, financial, and management systems and increase personnel, including personnel to support our clinical development, manufacturing, and commercialization efforts, and our operations as a public company;

•acquire other companies, products, product candidates, or technologies, or in-license the rights to other products, product candidates, or technologies; and

•develop, maintain, expand, and protect our intellectual property portfolio.

Our ability to become and remain profitable depends on our ability to generate revenue. We do not expect to generate revenue that is sufficient to achieve profitability unless and until we obtain marketing approval for and commercialize one of our product candidates and even if we obtain marketing approval for and commercialize one of our product candidates, we may never become profitable. Our product candidates are in various stages of preclinical and clinical development or pre-commercialization, and it is unknown whether our near-term efforts to obtain regulatory approval or commercial sales may be successful or whether additional preclinical, clinical, or manufacturing data may be needed before we obtain regulatory approval for any candidate. Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to become profitable or inability to remain profitable would decrease the value of our company and could impair our ability to raise capital, expand our business, maintain our research and development efforts, continue or undertake commercialization efforts, diversify our product offerings, or even continue our operations. A decline in the value of our company could also cause you to lose all or part of your investment.

We have no history of commercializing pharmaceutical products, which may make it difficult for you to evaluate the success of our business to date and to assess our future viability.

We are a biotechnology company and investment in biotechnological product development is a highly speculative endeavor. Biotechnology product development entails substantial upfront capital expenditures and there is significant risk that any potential product candidate will fail to demonstrate adequate efficacy or an acceptable safety profile, to gain any required regulatory approvals or to become commercially viable. To date, our operations have been limited to organizing and staffing our company, acquiring rights to intellectual property, business planning, raising capital, and developing our product candidates. We have not yet demonstrated an ability to obtain marketing approvals, manufacture a commercial-scale product, or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful product commercialization. Consequently, any predictions you make about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating history.

We have encountered, and will continue to encounter, risks and difficulties frequently experienced by growing companies in a rapidly developing and changing industry, such as the biotechnological industry, including challenges in forecasting accuracy, determining appropriate investments of our limited resources, gaining market acceptance of our products, if approved, managing a complex regulatory landscape, and developing new product candidates. Our current operating model may require changes in order for us to scale our operations efficiently. We will need to transition from a company with a research and development focus to a company capable of supporting commercial activities. We may not be successful in such a transition. You should consider our business and prospects in light of the risks and difficulties we face as a company focused on developing products in the fields of biopharmaceuticals and biotechnology.

We expect our financial condition and operating results to fluctuate significantly from quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. Accordingly, you should not rely upon the results of any quarterly or annual periods as indications of future operating performance.

We will need substantial additional funding. If we are unable to raise capital when needed, we could be forced to delay, reduce, or eliminate our product development programs or commercialization efforts.

We expect to devote substantial financial resources to our ongoing and planned product development activities, particularly as we continue the development of and seek marketing approval for our product candidates and any potential future product candidates, as applicable. As of December 31, 2024, we had cash of approximately $58.5 million. This amount will not meet our capital requirements over the next 12 months. We estimate that our cash and cash equivalents will enable us to fund our operations into the first quarter of 2026. Based on this estimate, we will need to raise significant additional capital in order to fund our future operations. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and our operating and capital requirements may change as a result of many factors currently unknown to us.

Table of Contents

Conducting preclinical testing and clinical trials is a time-consuming, expensive, and uncertain process that takes years to complete. We cannot predict when we will be able to generate the necessary data or results required to obtain regulatory approval of products with the market potential sufficient to enable us to achieve profitability, if ever. Accordingly, we may need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:

•the initiation, progress, timing, costs, and results of clinical trials for our product candidates;

•the outcome, timing, and cost of the regulatory approval process for our product candidates;

•the costs of manufacturing and commercialization;

•the costs related to doing business internationally with respect to the development and commercialization of our product candidates;

•the cost of filing, prosecuting, defending, and enforcing our patent claims and other intellectual property rights;

•the cost of defending intellectual property disputes, including patent infringement actions brought by third parties against us;

•the costs of expanding infrastructure to support our development, commercialization, and business efforts, including the costs related to the development of a laboratory and manufacturing facility;

•the costs involved in recruiting and retaining skilled personnel;

•the extent to which we in-license or acquire other products, product candidates, or technologies;

•the extent to which we out-license our product candidates; and

•the impact of geopolitical turmoil, macroeconomic conditions, social unrest, political instability, terrorism, or other acts of war.

Any additional fundraising efforts may divert our management from their day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize our product candidates. Moreover, adequate additional financing may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available to us on a timely basis, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce, or terminate preclinical studies, clinical trials, or other development activities for one or more of our product candidates or delay, limit, reduce, or terminate our establishment of sales and marketing capabilities or other activities that may be necessary to commercialize our product candidates.

Due to our limited resources and access to capital, we must, and have in the past decided to, prioritize development of certain product candidates over other potential product candidates. These decisions may prove to have been wrong and may adversely affect our ability to develop our own programs, our attractiveness as a commercial partner and may ultimately have an impact on our commercial success.

Because we have limited resources and access to capital to fund our operations, we must decide which product candidates to pursue and the amount of resources to allocate to each. Our decisions concerning the allocation of research, collaboration, management, and financial resources toward particular proprietary molecules in our library, product candidates or therapeutic areas may not lead to the development of viable commercial products and may divert resources away from better opportunities. Similarly, our decisions to delay, terminate or collaborate with third parties in respect of certain product development programs may also prove not to be optimal and could cause us to miss valuable opportunities. If we make incorrect determinations regarding the market potential of our product candidates or misread trends in the biopharmaceutical industry, in particular for our lead product candidates, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

We will need additional capital in order to enable us to successfully develop our product candidates, and such funding may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Raising additional capital may cause dilution to stockholders, restrict our operations, or require us to relinquish rights to our technologies or product candidates.

We will need additional capital in order to enable us to successfully develop and obtain authorization or approval for our product candidates. Such funding may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. We expect to raise additional capital through public and private placements of equity and/or debt, payments from potential strategic research and development arrangements, sales of assets, government grants, licensing and/or collaboration arrangements with pharmaceutical companies or other institutions, funding from the government, or funding from other third parties. We also intend to work closely with government agencies to obtain funding for the development of our novel inhaled mucosal vaccine platform.

Table of Contents

We are opportunistically pursuing vaccines development. In October 2023, the NIAID selected OCU500, a mucosal vaccine candidate specifically targeted to fight COVID-19, for inclusion in a Phase 1 trial comparing the administration of OCU500 via different mucosal routes—inhalation into the lungs or up the nose via a nasal spray. We are continuing discussions with relevant government agencies as well as strategic partners regarding developmental funding for our OCU510 and OCU520 platforms.

If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances, licensing arrangements, or marketing and distribution arrangements, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates, or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. Such arrangements may require us to grant rights to develop and market products or product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market on our own.

The terms of our Loan and Security Agreement with Avenue Capital Management II, L.P. and the lenders listed therein as well as our loan agreement (the "EB-5 Loan Agreement") with EB5 Life Sciences, L.P. ("EB-5 Life Sciences") require us to meet certain operating covenants and place restrictions on our operating and financial flexibility. If we raise additional capital through debt financing, the terms of any new debt could further restrict our ability to operate our business.

On November 6, 2024, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Avenue Capital Management II, L.P., as administrative agent and collateral agent (the "Agent," together with Avenue I and Avenue II, "Avenue"), Avenue Venture Opportunities Fund II, L.P., as a lender ("Avenue 2"), and Avenue Venture Opportunities Fund, L.P., as a lender ("Avenue 1", and together with Avenue 2, the "Lenders") (the “Loan and Security Agreement”) that is secured by a lien on all of our assets. As of December 31, 2024, we had $30.0 million of outstanding principal borrowings under the Loan and Security Agreement. Additionally, as of December 31, 2024, we had $2.5 million of outstanding principal borrowings under the EB-5 Loan Agreement, which we are required to repay on the seventh anniversary of the date of the last disbursement under the EB-5 Loan Agreement (unless terminated earlier pursuant to the terms of the EB-5 Loan Agreement).

The Loan and Security Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default. Affirmative covenants include, among others, covenants requiring us to protect and maintain our intellectual property and comply with all applicable laws, deliver certain financial reports and maintain insurance coverage. Negative covenants include, among others, covenants restricting us from transferring any part of our business or intellectual property, incurring additional indebtedness, engaging in mergers or acquisitions, repurchasing shares, paying dividends or making other distributions, making investments, and creating other liens on our assets, including our intellectual property, in each case subject to customary exceptions. Our obligations under the EB-5 Loan Agreement are secured by substantially all of our assets other than our intellectual property. We could in the future incur additional indebtedness beyond our borrowings under the EB-5 Loan Agreement. If we raise any additional debt financing, the terms of such additional debt could further restrict our operating and financial flexibility. These restrictions may include, among other things, limitations on the incurrence of additional debt and specific restrictions on the use of our assets, as well as prohibitions on our ability to create liens, pay dividends, redeem capital stock or make investments. If we default under the terms of the Loan and Security Agreement, the EB-5 Loan Agreement or any future debt facility, Avenue or EB-5 Life Sciences may accelerate all of our repayment obligations and take control of our pledged assets, potentially requiring us to renegotiate our agreement on terms less favorable to us or to immediately cease operations. Further, if we were to be liquidated, Avenue’s and EB-5 Life Sciences' rights to repayment would be senior to the rights of the holders of our common stock. Avenue could declare an event of default upon the occurrence of any event that could reasonably be expected to result in what they interpret as a material adverse effect as defined under the Loan and Security Agreement or the EB-5 Loan Agreement. Any declaration by Avenue of an event of default could significantly harm our business and prospects and could cause the price of our common stock to decline.

Our existing or future debt could have significant adverse consequences, including:

•requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of cash flow from operations or cash on hand to the payment of interest on, and principal of, our debt, which will reduce the amounts available to fund working capital, capital expenditures, product development efforts, and other general corporate purposes;

•increasing our vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic, industry, and market conditions;

•subjecting us to restrictive covenants that may reduce our ability to take certain corporate actions or obtain further debt or equity financing (for instance, the EB-5 Loan Agreement includes restrictive covenants related to, among other things, the disposition of our property, the incurrence by us of any additional indebtedness, and the creation by us of any liens or other encumbrances); and

•limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and our industry; and placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt or better debt servicing options.

In order to satisfy our current and future debt service obligations, we will be required to raise funds from external sources. We may be unable to arrange for additional financing to pay the amounts due under our existing debt. Funds from external sources

Table of Contents

may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. Our failure to satisfy our current and future debt obligations could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our management has broad discretion in the use of the net proceeds from our capital raises, including our November 2024 debt financing transaction, and may not use these proceeds effectively.

Our management has broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds from our capital raises, including our July 2024 Public Offering (as defined below), November 2024 debt financing, and our stockholders will not have the opportunity as part of their investment decision to assess whether the net proceeds from our capital raises are being used appropriately. Our stockholders may not agree with our decisions, and our use of the proceeds may not yield any return on investment for our stockholders. Because of the number and variability of factors that will determine our use of the net proceeds from our capital raises, their ultimate use may vary substantially from their currently intended use. Our failure to apply the net proceeds of our capital raises effectively could compromise our ability to pursue our growth strategy and we might not be able to yield a significant return, if any, on our investment of those net proceeds. Our stockholders will not have the opportunity to influence our decisions on how to use our net proceeds from our capital raises. We have and may continue to invest the net proceeds from our capital raises in investment-grade, interest-bearing instruments and the United States government agency securities and treasuries. These investments are not likely to yield a significant return. Our management might not apply our existing cash and cash equivalents in ways that ultimately increase the value of your investment. The failure by our management to apply these funds effectively could harm our business.

We have restated in the past our prior consolidated financial statements, which may lead to additional risks and uncertainties, including loss of investor confidence and negative impacts on our stock price.

In the 2023 Annual Report, we restated our consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, and the quarters ended September 30, 2022, June 30, 2022, March 31, 2022, September 30, 2023, June 30, 2023, and March 31, 2023 (the “Restated Periods”). The determination to restate the financial statements for the Restated Periods was made by our Audit Committee of the Board upon management’s recommendation following the identification of errors related us not appropriately accounting for the estimated non-cash consideration and expense in one of our collaboration arrangements. These identified errors resulted in a restatement of the following financial statements line items captions: Collaborative arrangement revenue, Research and development expenses, Other income (expense), net and Accrued expense and other current liabilities. Our management, after consultation with our prior independent registered accountants, concluded that our Previously Issued Financial Statements for the Restated Periods should no longer be relied upon.

The restatement of our Previously Issued Financial Statements has been time-consuming and expensive and could expose us to additional risks that could materially adversely affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows, including unanticipated costs for accounting and legal fees in connection with or related to the restatement and the risk of potential stockholder litigation. If lawsuits are filed, we may incur additional substantial defense costs regardless of the outcome of such litigation. Likewise, such events might cause a diversion of our management’s time and attention. If we do not prevail in any such litigation, we could be required to pay substantial damages or settlement costs. In addition, the restatement may lead to a loss of investor confidence and have negative impacts on the trading price of our common stock.

Our ability to utilize our tax net operating losses is uncertain.

We have incurred significant net operating losses since our inception. As of December 31, 2024, we had United States federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $263.9 million. Our ability to utilize these net operating losses to offset future tax liabilities depends on the successful development of our product candidates and future financial performance.

Additionally, our net operating losses may be subject to Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Section 382"). Generally, if an ownership change occurs within three years of the closing date of an entity's most recent change in control transaction, any existing net operating losses and certain built-in losses would be subject to an additional limitation, pursuant to Section 382. Change in control as defined by Section 382 occurs when there is an ownership change among stockholders owning directly or indirectly 5% or more of our common stock, as well as an aggregate ownership change with respect to such stockholders of more than 50% of our common stock. We have not yet conducted a comprehensive study to assess whether a change of ownership as defined by Section 382 has occurred since our inception. If it is determined that we are unable to use our net operating losses to reduce future tax liabilities, our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows may be adversely affected.

Table of Contents

We may be subject to future changes intax legislation or exposure to additional tax liabilities that may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

We are subject to taxes in the United States as well as the foreign jurisdictions where our subsidiaries are organized. Due to economic and political conditions, tax rates, tax laws, and other non-tax legislation, we may experience significant impacts as a result of prospective changes. Our future effective tax rates may be affected by changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, changes in available tax credits or tax deductions, as well as changes in tax law and other non-tax laws, or their interpretation.

Our tax returns and other tax matters are subject to examination by applicable tax authorities and governmental bodies. We regularly assess the likelihood of an adverse outcome resulting from examination, in order to determine any resulting impact to our provision for income taxes or deferred tax balances. There can be no assurance as to the outcome of these examinations. As such, if we were to sustain an adjustment as a result of a tax examination in excess of amounts previously accrued, our financial condition could be adversely affected.

Risks Related to Our Business and the Development of Our Product Candidates

We are substantially dependent on the success of our product candidates. We cannot guarantee that our product candidates will successfully complete development, receive regulatory approval, or be successfully commercialized.

We have invested a significant portion of our efforts and financial resources in the development of our product candidates. We currently have no products authorized or approved for which we have successfully commercially distributed, and we have not generated revenues from sales of any products. Our business and our ability to generate revenues in the near term depends entirely on the successful development, approval, and commercialization of our product candidates, which may never occur. If the results or timing of regulatory filings, the regulatory process, regulatory developments, clinical trials or preclinical studies, or other activities, actions, or decisions related to our product candidates do not meet our or others' expectations, the market price of our common stock could decline significantly.

Our product candidates are susceptible to the risks of failure inherent at any stage of product development, including the appearance of unexpected or unacceptable adverse events or failure to demonstrate efficacy in clinical trials. Further, our product candidates may not receive regulatory approval even if they are successful in clinical trials, and our product candidates may not be successfully commercialized even if they receive regulatory approval.

Our product candidates are in various stages of development ranging from pre-clinical development to pre-commercialization.

The success of our product candidates and our ability to generate revenues from our product candidates, if approved, will depend on many factors including our ability to:

•complete and obtain favorable results from our clinical trials and preclinical studies with respect to our product candidates;

•apply for and receive marketing approval from the applicable regulatory authorities;

•receive regulatory approval for claims that are necessary or desirable for successful marketing;

•receive approval for our manufacturing processes and facilities from the applicable regulatory authorities;

•recruit and enroll qualified patients for clinical trials with respect to our product candidates in a timely manner;

•expand and maintain a workforce of experienced scientists and others with experience in relevant technologies to continue to develop our product candidates;

•hire, train, and deploy marketing and sales representatives or contract with a third-party for marketing and sales representatives to commercialize product candidates in the United States and key foreign markets;

•launch and create market demand for our product candidates, if approved, through marketing and sales activities, and any other arrangements to promote these product candidates that we may otherwise establish;

•achieve market acceptance of our product candidates by patients, the medical community, and third-party payors;

•effectively compete with other therapies and establish a market share;

•maintain a continued acceptable safety and efficacy profile of our product candidates, if approved, following commercial launch;

Table of Contents

•achieve appropriate reimbursement, pricing, and payment coverage for our product candidates, if approved;

•manufacture product candidates in sufficient quantities and at acceptable quality and manufacturing cost to meet commercial demand at launch and thereafter;

•establish and maintain agreements with wholesalers, distributors, and group purchasing organizations on commercially reasonable terms;

•pursue partnerships with, or offer licenses to, qualified third parties to promote and sell product candidates, if approved, in domestic and key foreign markets where we receive marketing approval;

•develop our product candidates for additional indications or for use in broader patient populations;

•maintain patent and trade secret protection and regulatory exclusivity for our product candidates; and

•qualify for, identify, register, maintain, enforce, and defend intellectual property rights and claims covering our products and intellectual property portfolio; and not infringe on others’ intellectual property rights.

To the extent we are not able to do any of the foregoing, our business may be materially harmed. If we do not receive FDA or other applicable foreign regulatory approval for, and successfully commercialize our product candidates, we will not be able to generate revenue from these product candidates in the United States or other key foreign markets for the foreseeable future or at all.

Our product candidates generated from our modifier gene therapy platform are based on a novel technology and face an uncertain regulatory environment, which makes it difficult to predict the time and cost of product candidate development and subsequently obtaining regulatory approval.

A substantial portion of our product research and development efforts is centered around our modifier gene therapy platform. The regulatory approval and successful commercialization of OCU400, OCU410, and OCU410ST depend on the successful development of this platform. There can be no assurance that any development problems we experience in the future related to our modifier gene therapy platform will not cause significant delays or unanticipated costs, or that such development problems can be solved. The clinical trial requirements of the FDA, the EMA, and other regulatory agencies, and the criteria used by these regulators to determine the safety and efficacy of a product candidate vary substantially according to the type, complexity, novelty, and intended use and market of such product candidates. The regulatory approval process for novel product candidates such as these can be more expensive and take longer than for other, better known, or extensively studied pharmaceuticals or other product types.

Regulatory requirements governing gene and cell therapy products have changed frequently and may continue to change in the future. For example, the FDA established the Office of Tissues and Advanced Therapies within its Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research ("CBER") to consolidate the review of gene therapy and related products, and the Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee to advise CBER on its review. Gene therapy clinical trials conducted at institutions that receive funding for recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid ("DNA") research from the NIH are also subject to review by the NIH Novel and Exceptional Technology and Research Advisory Committee ("NExTRAC"), formerly the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee, which now focuses on emerging areas of research including, but not restricted to, technologies surrounding advances in recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid research. Although the FDA decides whether individual gene therapy protocols may proceed, it is possible the NExTRAC review process, if undertaken for any of our candidates, could delay the initiation of a clinical trial, even if the FDA has reviewed the trial design and details and approved its initiation. Before a clinical trial can begin at a study site, the institution’s IRB and its IBC have to review the proposed clinical trial to assess the safety of the trial. In addition, adverse developments in clinical trials of gene therapy products conducted by others may cause the FDA or other regulatory bodies to change the requirements for approval of any of our product candidates.

These regulatory review committees and advisory groups and the new guidelines they promulgate may lengthen the regulatory review process, require us to perform additional studies, increase our development costs, lead to changes in regulatory positions and interpretations, delay or prevent approval and commercialization of our product candidates, or lead to significant post-approval limitations or restrictions. As we advance our gene therapy product candidates, we will be required to consult with these regulatory and advisory groups, and comply with applicable guidelines. If we fail to do so, we may be required to delay or discontinue development of our gene therapy product candidates. These additional processes may result in a review and approval process that is longer than we otherwise would have expected for orphan ophthalmology product candidates. Delay or failure to obtain, or unexpected costs in obtaining the regulatory approval necessary to bring a potential product to market could decrease our ability to generate sufficient product revenue to maintain our business.

Table of Contents

Existing data on the safety and efficacy of gene therapy is very limited and sometimes include historically poor clinical efficacy of previous non-replicating gene therapy products. In addition, there have been publicized safety issues associated with previous gene therapy products in third-party clinical trials, including patient deaths. The results of preclinical and clinical trials performed for our product candidates will not definitively predict safety or efficacy in humans. OCU400, OCU410, and OCU410ST use an AAV vector. Possible serious side effects of other viral vector-based gene therapies in general include uncontrolled viral infections and the development of cancer, particularly lymphoma or leukemia. The risk of insertional mutagenesis or oncogenesis remains a significant concern for gene therapy, and we cannot provide any assurance that it will not occur in any of our ongoing or planned clinical trials with respect to our product candidates based on our modifier gene therapy platform. There is also the potential risk of delayed adverse events following exposure to gene therapy products due to persistent biological activity of the genetic material or other components of products used to carry the genetic material. Potential procedure-related adverse reactions, including inflammation, can also occur. If any such adverse events occur during clinical trials, further advancement of such clinical trials could be halted or delayed, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

Finally, the public's attitude may be influenced by claims that gene therapy technology is unsafe, unethical, or immoral. If we are unable to convincingly demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates arising from our gene modifier platform, our product candidates, even if approved by the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities, may not gain the acceptance of the public or the medical community. For example, in November 2023, the FDA announced it was investigating the risk of T cell malignancies associated with currently approved BCMA- and CD19-directed autologous CAR T cell immunotherapies. The FDA subsequently announced class safety labeling changes to highlight these risks and recommend life-long monitoring of patients and clinical trial participants receiving treatment with these products. It is unclear these safety events and resulting FDA action may adversely impact the FDA’s approach to regulating any product candidates we may develop based on the use of our modifier gene therapy platform, or may negatively impact patients’, providers’, or public perception of such product candidates.

The regulatory approval processes of the FDA and comparable foreign authorities are lengthy, time consuming, and inherently unpredictable. If we are not able to obtain, or if there are delays in obtaining required regulatory approvals, we will not be able to commercialize our product candidates as expected, and our ability to generate revenue will be materially impaired.

The research, testing, manufacturing, labeling, approval, selling, marketing, and distribution of pharmaceutical products are subject to extensive regulations by the FDA and other regulatory authorities, which regulations differ from country to country. The time required to obtain approval by the FDA and comparable foreign authorities is unpredictable but typically takes many years following the commencement of clinical trials. The outcome of the approval process is inherently uncertain and depends upon numerous factors, including the substantial discretion of the regulatory authorities. This is especially true for rare and/or complicated diseases. Failure can occur at any time during the clinical trial process. We cannot predict if or when we might receive regulatory approvals for any of our product candidates currently under development. Any delay in our obtaining or our failure to obtain required approvals could materially adversely affect our ability to generate revenue from the particular product candidate, which likely would result in significant harm to our financial position and adversely impact our stock price.

Securing marketing approval requires the submission of extensive preclinical and clinical data and supporting information to regulatory authorities for each therapeutic indication to establish the product candidate’s safety and efficacy for that indication. We may be unable to design and execute a clinical trial to support marketing approval. Securing marketing approval also requires the submission of information about the product manufacturing process to, and inspection of, manufacturing facilities and clinical trial sites by the regulatory authorities. Regulatory authorities have substantial discretion in the approval process and may refuse to accept any application or may decide that our data is insufficient for approval and require additional preclinical, clinical, or other studies. The number and types of preclinical studies and clinical trials that will be required for regulatory approval also varies depending on the product candidate, the disease or condition that the product candidate is designed to address, and the regulations applicable to any particular product candidate. The FDA or other similar regulatory authorities may determine that our product candidates are not effective or only moderately effective (e.g., studies may not produce the necessary result on all study endpoints), that our studies failed to reach the necessary level of statistical significance, or that our product candidates have undesirable or unintended side effects, toxicities, or other characteristics that preclude us from obtaining marketing approval or prevent or limit commercial use.

We may experience numerous unforeseen events during, or as a result of, clinical trials that could delay or prevent our ability to receive marketing approval or commercialize our product candidates, including:

•regulators, including the FDA and the NIH, or IRBs or IBCs may not authorize us or our investigators to commence or continue a clinical trial, conduct a clinical trial at a prospective trial site, or amend trial protocols, or regulators, IRBs, or IBCs may require that we modify or amend our clinical trial protocols;

Table of Contents

•we may experience delays in reaching, or fail to reach, agreement on acceptable clinical trial contracts or clinical trial protocols with prospective trial sites and our CDMOs;

•the number of patients required for clinical trials of our product candidates may be larger than we anticipate, enrollment in these clinical trials may be slower than we anticipate, or participants may drop out of these clinical trials, or be lost to follow-up at a higher rate than we anticipate;

•our third-party contractors may fail to comply with regulatory requirements or the clinical trial protocol, or meet their contractual obligations to us in a timely manner, or at all, or we may be required to engage in additional clinical trial site monitoring;

•us, the regulators, IRBs, or IBCs may require the suspension or termination of clinical research for various reasons, including noncompliance with regulatory requirements or a finding that the participants are being exposed to unacceptable health risks, undesirable side effects, or other unexpected characteristics (alone or in combination with other products) of the product candidate, or due to findings of undesirable effects caused by a chemically or mechanistically similar therapeutic or therapeutic candidate;

•changes in marketing approval policies or regulations, or changes in or the enactment of additional statutes or regulations, during the development period rendering our data insufficient to obtain marketing approval and requiring us to conduct additional studies;

•the cost of clinical trials of our product candidates may be greater than we anticipate or we may have insufficient funds for a clinical trial or to pay the substantial user fees required by the FDA upon the filing of a marketing application;

•the supply or quality of our product candidates or other materials necessary to conduct clinical trials of our product candidates may be insufficient or inadequate;

•we may have delays in adding new investigators or clinical trial sites, or we may experience a withdrawal of clinical trial sites;

•patients that enroll in our studies may misrepresent their eligibility or may otherwise not comply with the clinical trial protocol, resulting in the need to drop the patients from the study, increase the needed enrollment size for the study, or extend the study’s duration;

•the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with our study design, including endpoints, or our interpretation of data from preclinical studies and clinical trials or find that a product candidate’s benefits do not outweigh its safety risks;

•the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may not accept data from studies with clinical trial sites in foreign countries;

•the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may disagree with our intended indications;

•the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may fail to approve or subsequently find fault with the manufacturing processes or our contract manufacturer’s manufacturing facility for clinical and future commercial supplies;

•the data collected from clinical trials of our product candidates may not be sufficient to the satisfaction of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities to support the submission of a marketing application, or other comparable submissions in foreign jurisdictions, or to obtain regulatory approval in the United States or elsewhere;

•the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may take longer than we anticipate to make a decision on our product candidates; and

•we may not be able to demonstrate that a product candidate provides an advantage over current standards of care or current or future competitive therapies in development.

Significant delays relating to any preclinical or clinical trials also could shorten any periods during which we may have the exclusive right to commercialize our product candidates, if approved, or allow our competitors to bring products to market before we do. This may prevent us from receiving marketing approvals and impair our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates, if approved, and may harm our business and results of operations. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, delays in clinical trials may ultimately lead to the denial of marketing approval of any of our product candidates. If any of this occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects will be materially harmed.

Table of Contents

The failure to comply with FDA and comparable foreign regulatory requirements may, either before or after product approval, if any, subject us to administrative or judicially imposed sanctions, including:

•restrictions on our ability to conduct clinical trials, including full or partial clinical holds on ongoing or planned trials;

•restrictions on our products, manufacturers, or manufacturing process;

•warning letters, Form 483s, or untitled letters alleging violations;

•civil and criminal penalties;

•injunctions;

•suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approvals;

•product seizures, detentions, or import bans;

•voluntary or mandatory product recalls and publicity requirements;

•total or partial suspension of production;

•imposition of restrictions on operations, including costly new manufacturing requirements; and

•refusal to approve pending marketing applications or supplements to approved marketing applications.

Even if we were to obtain regulatory approval of a product candidate, the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may grant approval for fewer or more limited indications, populations, or uses than we request, may require significant safety warnings, including black box warnings, contraindications, and precautions, may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly post-marketing clinical trials, surveillance, restrictions on use or other requirements, including a REMS to monitor the safety or efficacy of the product, or may approve a product candidate with a label that does not include the labeling claims necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of that product candidate. Any of these scenarios could compromise the commercial prospects for our product candidates.

The development and manufacture of biologics is a complex process and entails particular risks.

OCU200 is our novel biologic designed to treat retinal diseases. The process of developing and manufacturing biologics is complex, highly regulated, and subject to multiple risks, and we have no experience in successfully developing, manufacturing, or commercializing a biologics product. The manufacturing of biologics is highly susceptible to product loss due to contamination, equipment failure, improper installation or operation of equipment, vendor or operator error, inconsistency in yields, variability in product characteristics, and difficulties in scaling the production process. Even minor deviations from normal manufacturing processes could result in reduced production yields, product defects and other supply disruptions, and higher costs.

The raw materials required in our third-party vendors’ manufacturing processes are derived from biological sources. We cannot assure you that our third-party vendors have, or will, be able to obtain on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, sufficient rights to these materials derived from biological sources. Such raw materials are difficult to procure and may also be subject to contamination or recall. If microbial, viral, or other contaminations are discovered at the facilities of our manufacturer, such facilities may need to be closed for an extended period of time to investigate and remedy the contamination, which could delay clinical trials, result in higher costs of drug product, and adversely harm our business. A material shortage, recall, or restriction on the use of biologically derived substances in the manufacture of our product candidates could adversely impact or disrupt the clinical and commercial manufacturing of our product candidates, which could materially and adversely affect our operating results and development timelines. In addition, the United States government has imposed a 10% additional tariff on imports from China and may impose more restrictions on goods, including biologically derived substances, manufactured in or imported from China or impose other restrictions on companies' ability to work with Chinese biotech companies. This could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations. In addition, regional or single-source dependencies may in some cases accentuate these risks. For example, the pharmaceutical industry generally, and in some instances us or our collaborators or other third parties on which we rely, depend on China-based suppliers or service providers for certain raw materials, goods, including biologically derived substances, products and services, or other activities. Our ability or the ability of our collaborators or such other third parties to continue to engage these China-based suppliers or service provides and Chinese biotech companies for certain preclinical research programs and clinical development programs could be restricted due to geopolitical developments between the United States and China, including as a result of the escalation of tariffs or other trade restrictions or if the previously proposed federal legislation known as the BIOSECURE Act or a similar law were to be enacted.

Table of Contents

In addition, our biologic product candidates may expose us to additional potential product liability claims. The development of biologic products entails a risk of additional product liability claims because of the risk of transmitting disease to human recipients, and substantial product liability claims may be asserted against us as a result.

OCU400 and OCU410ST have received ODDs from the FDA, OCU400 has received OMPD from the EC and OCU410ST has OMPD from the EMA. However, there is no guarantee that we will be able to maintain these designations, receive these designations for any of our other product candidates, or receive or maintain any corresponding benefits, including periods of exclusivity.

We have obtained from the FDA Office of Orphan Products, ODDs for OCU400 for RP and LCA and had previously received ODDs for the treatment of the following disease genotypes: NR2E3, RHO, CEP290, and PDE6ß mutation-associated inherited retinal degenerations. OCU400 has additionally received OMPD from the EC, based on the recommendation of the EMA, for RP and LCA. We have also received ODD and OMPD for OCU410ST for the treatment of ABCA4-associated retinopathies including Stargardt, RP19 and CORD3 diseases. We may also seek ODD or OMPD for our other product candidates, as appropriate. While these ODDs and OMPDs provide us with certain advantages, they neither shorten the development time or regulatory review time of a product candidate nor give the product candidate any advantage in the regulatory review or approval process.

Generally, if a product candidate with ODD or OMPD is the first to receive marketing approval for the orphan indication, the product is entitled to a period of marketing exclusivity, which precludes the FDA or EC from approving another MAA for the same (or a similar in the European Union) drug or biologic for the same indication for a specified time period. The applicable period is seven years in the United States and 10 years in the European Union. The European Union exclusivity period can be reduced to six years if, at the end of the fifth year, it is established that a product no longer meets the criteria for OMPD or if the product is sufficiently profitable so that market exclusivity is no longer justified. Legislation has been proposed by the EC that, if implemented, has the potential in some cases to shorten the ten-year period of orphan drug exclusivity.

We may not be able to obtain any future ODDs or OMPDs that we apply for. Receiving ODDs or OMPDs do not guarantee that we will be able to successfully develop our product candidates, and there is no guarantee that we will be able to maintain any ODDs or OMPDs that we receive. For instance, ODDs may be revoked if the FDA finds that the request for designation contained an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted material information, or if the FDA finds that the product candidate was not eligible for designation at the time of the submission of the request.

Moreover, even if we are able to receive and maintain ODDs or OMPDs, we may ultimately not receive any period of regulatory exclusivity if our product candidates are approved. For instance, we may not receive orphan product regulatory exclusivity if the indication for which we receive FDA or EC regulatory approval is different than the ODD or OMPD. Orphan exclusivity may also be lost for the same reasons that ODD or OMPD may be lost.

Even if we obtain orphan exclusivity for any of our current or future product candidates, that exclusivity may not effectively protect the product candidate, if approved, from competition as different products can be approved for the same condition or products that are the same as ours can be approved for different conditions. Even after an orphan product is approved, the FDA or EC can also subsequently approve a product containing the same principal molecular features for the same condition if: (i) the regulatory authority concludes that the latter product is clinically superior by means of greater effectiveness, greater safety, or providing a major contribution to patient care, (ii) if we are unable to assure a sufficient quantity of the product to meet the needs of patients with the rare disease or condition, or (iii) we consent to the authorization of the latter product.

If another sponsor receives approval for such product before we do, we would be prevented from launching our product for the orphan indication during the period of marketing exclusivity unless we can demonstrate clinical superiority to the authorized orphan product (or in other very limited circumstances).

We have pursued, and may in the future pursue, fast track, breakthrough therapy, or RMAT designations from the FDA for one or more of our product candidates. Even though some of our product candidates received RMAT Designation and these or other product candidates may in the future receive fast track, breakthrough therapy or RMAT designations, we may be unable to obtain and maintain the benefits associated with such designations. These designations may not lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval process and will not increase the likelihood that such product candidates will receive marketing approval.

In May 2022, the FDA granted RMAT designation to NeoCart for the repair of full-thickness lesions of the knee cartilage in adults. In December 2023, the FDA granted RMAT designation to OCU400 for the treatment of RP associated with NR2E3 and RHO mutations. In the future, we may seek additional product designations, such as breakthrough therapy and additional

Table of Contents

RMAT and fast track designations, which are intended to facilitate the development or regulatory review or approval process for product candidates. Receipt of such a designation is within the discretion of the FDA. Accordingly, even if we believe one of our product candidates meets the criteria for a designation, the FDA may disagree. In any event, the receipt of such a designation for a product candidate may not result in a faster development process, review, or approval compared to product candidates considered for approval under conventional FDA procedures and does not assure ultimate marketing approval by the FDA. In addition, the FDA may later decide that the product candidates no longer meet the designation conditions, in which case any granted designations may be revoked.

The FDA may determine that our product candidates have undesirable side effects that could delay or prevent their regulatory approval or commercialization. If such side effects are identified during the development of our product candidates, we may need to abandon our development of such product candidates.

Undesirable side effects caused by our product candidates could cause us, IRBs, and other reviewing entities or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay, or halt clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive label or the delay or denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or other comparable foreign authorities. For example, if concerns are raised regarding the safety of one of our product candidates as a result of undesirable side effects identified during preclinical or clinical testing, the FDA may order us to cease further development or issue a letter requesting additional data or information prior to making a final decision regarding whether or not to approve the product candidate. FDA requests for additional data or information can result in substantial delays in the approval of a new product candidate.

Undesirable side effects caused by any unexpected characteristics (alone or in combination with other products) for any of our product candidates could also result in denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or other comparable foreign authorities for any or all targeted indications or the inclusion of unfavorable information in our product labeling, such as limitations on the indicated uses or populations for which the products may be marketed or distributed, a label with significant safety warnings, including boxed warnings, contraindications, and precautions, a label without statements necessary or desirable for successful commercialization, may result in requirements for costly post-marketing testing and surveillance, or other requirements, including REMS, to monitor the safety or efficacy of the products. These could prevent us from commercializing and generating revenues from the sale of our product candidates.

Many compounds that initially showed promise in clinical or earlier stage testing have later been found to cause side effects that prevented further development of the compound. In addition, adverse events which had initially been considered unrelated to the study treatment may later be found to be caused by the study treatment. Moreover, incorrect or improper use of our product candidates (including use more frequently than is prescribed), if approved, by patients could cause unexpected side effects or adverse events. There can be no assurance that our product candidates, if approved, will be used correctly, and if used incorrectly, such misuse could prevent our receipt or maintenance of marketing approval, resulting in label changes or regulatory authority safety communications or warnings, or hamper commercial adoption of our product candidate, if approved, at the rate we currently expect. Additionally, we currently provide expanded access to OCU400 in the United States to certain eligible adults. There may be adverse events arising during the course of this or any future EAP we might implement which could adversely impact the further development or approvability of our product candidates.

If any of our product candidates are associated with SAEs, undesirable side effects, or have properties that are unexpected, we may need to abandon development or limit development of that product candidate to certain uses or subpopulations in which the undesirable side effects or other characteristics are less prevalent, less severe, or more acceptable from a risk-benefit perspective. The therapeutic-related side effects could affect patient recruitment or the ability of enrolled patients to complete the trial or result in potential product liability claims. We may also be held liable for harm caused to patients and our reputation may suffer. Any of these occurrences may significantly harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

If we experience delays or difficulties in the enrollment of patients in clinical trials, our completion of clinical trials and receipt of necessary regulatory approvals could be delayed or prevented.

Identifying and qualifying patients to participate in clinical trials of our product candidates is critical to our success. The timing of our clinical trials depends on the speed at which we can recruit patients to participate in testing our product candidates. Our ongoing clinical trials could be discontinued early if they experience slow enrollment, and we may also experience similar difficulties in future clinical trials. If patients are unwilling to participate in our clinical trials because of negative publicity from adverse events related to vaccines, gene therapy, or in the industry more broadly, in the clinical trials for related third party product candidates, or for other reasons, including competitive clinical trials for similar patient populations, the timeline for recruiting patients, conducting studies, and obtaining regulatory approval of potential products may be delayed. These delays

Table of Contents

could result in increased costs, delays in advancing our product development, delays in testing the effectiveness of our product candidates, or termination of the clinical trials altogether.

We or our clinical trial sites may not be able to identify, recruit, and enroll a sufficient number of patients, or those with the required or desired characteristics in a clinical trial, to complete our clinical trials in a timely manner. Patient enrollment is affected by other factors including:

•the size and nature of the patient population (for instance, we are pursuing clinical trials for certain orphan indications, for which the size of the patient population is limited);

•the severity of the disease under investigation;

•the existence of current treatments for the indications for which we are conducting clinical trials;

•the eligibility criteria for and design of the clinical trial in question, including factors such as frequency of required assessments, length of the study, and ongoing monitoring requirements;

•the perceived risks and benefits of the product candidate, including the potential advantages or disadvantages of the product candidate being studied in relation to other available therapies;

•competition in recruiting and enrolling patients in clinical trials;

•efforts to facilitate timely enrollment in clinical trials;

•patient referral practices of physicians;

•effectiveness of publicity created by clinical trial sites regarding the trial;

•patients’ ability to comply with the specific instructions related to the trial protocol, proper documentation, and use of the product candidate;

•an inability to obtain or maintain patients' informed consents;

•the risk that enrolled patients will drop out before completion or not return for post-treatment follow-up;

•the ability to monitor patients adequately during and after treatment;

•the ability to compensate patients for their time and effort; and

•the proximity and availability of clinical trial sites for prospective patients.

We may not be able to initiate or continue conducting clinical trials for our product candidates if we are unable to locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate in these clinical trials as required by the FDA or similar regulatory authorities outside the United States. Our inability to enroll a sufficient number of patients for our clinical trials would result in significant delays and could require us to abandon one or more clinical trials altogether. In particular, there may be low or slow enrollment, and the studies may enroll subjects that do not meet the inclusion criteria, requiring the erroneously enrolled subjects to be excluded and the trial population to be increased. Moreover, patients in our clinical trials, especially patients in our control groups, may be at risk for dropping out of our studies if they are not experiencing relief of their disease. A significant number of withdrawn patients would compromise the quality of a study's data.

Enrollment difficulties or delays in our clinical trials may result in increased development costs for our product candidates, or the inability to complete development of our product candidates, which would cause our value to decline, limit our ability to obtain additional financing, and materially impair our ability to generate revenues.

Data from preclinical studies and early-stage clinical trials and "top-line", initial or preliminary data from our clinical trials may not be predictive of success in later clinical trials.

The results of preclinical studies, preliminary study results, and early-stage clinical trials of our product candidates may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials or the ultimately completed clinical trial. Preliminary and final results from such studies may not be representative of study results that are found in larger, controlled, blinded, and more long-term studies. Product candidates in later stages of clinical trials may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy traits despite having progressed through preclinical studies and initial clinical trials. A number of companies have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials, notwithstanding promising results in earlier clinical trials. In some instances, there can be significant variability in safety or efficacy results between different clinical trials of the same product candidate due to numerous factors, including changes in trial procedures set forth in protocols, differences in the size and type of the patient populations, changes in and adherence to the clinical trial protocols, and the rate of dropout among clinical trial participants.

Table of Contents

In addition, from time to time, we may publish interim, “top-line,” initial, or preliminary data from our clinical trials. Interim data from clinical trials are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and more patient data becomes available. Preliminary, initial, or “top-line” data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data previously published. As a result, interim, “top-line”, initial, and preliminary data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. Adverse changes between preliminary, initial, “top-line” or interim data and final data could significantly harm our business prospects.

We may, in the future, conduct clinical trials for product candidates at sites outside the United States, and the FDA may not accept data from clinical trials conducted in such locations.

We may, in the future, choose to conduct one or more of our clinical trials outside the United States. Although the FDA may accept data from clinical trials conducted outside the United States, acceptance of data is in either case subject to the respective conditions imposed by the FDA. For example, the clinical trial must be well designed and conducted and be performed by qualified investigators in accordance with ethical principles, such as IRB or ethics committee approval and informed consent. The trial population must also adequately represent the United States population, and the data must be applicable to the United States population and United States medical practice in ways that the FDA deems clinically meaningful. In addition, while these clinical trials are subject to the applicable local laws (and therefore failure to comply with such laws could result in regulatory enforcement action), acceptance of the data by the FDA will be dependent upon its determination that the clinical trials were conducted consistent with all applicable United States laws and regulations. If the FDA does not accept the data from any clinical trial that we conduct outside the United States, it would likely result in the need for additional trials, which would be costly and time-consuming and could delay or permanently halt our development of the applicable product candidates.

Failure to obtain marketing approval in international jurisdictions would prevent our product candidates from being marketed abroad.

In order to market and sell our products in jurisdictions outside the United States, we must obtain separate marketing approvals in international jurisdictions and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements. The approval procedures vary among countries and the time required to obtain approval may differ substantially from that required to obtain FDA approval. The regulatory approval process outside the United States generally includes all of the risks associated with obtaining FDA approval. In addition, in many countries outside the United States, it is required that the product be approved for reimbursement before the product can be approved for sale in that country. The clinical trials of our product candidates may not be sufficient to support an application for marketing approval outside the United States. Seeking foreign regulatory approval could result in difficulties and costs for us and require additional preclinical studies or clinical trials which could be costly and time consuming.

We do not have any product candidates approved for sale in any jurisdiction, including in international markets, and we do not have experience in obtaining regulatory approval in international markets. We, or any current or eventual collaborators, may not obtain approvals from regulatory authorities outside the United States on a timely basis, if at all. Approval by the FDA does not guarantee approval by regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions, and approval by one regulatory authority outside the United States does not guarantee approval by regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions or by the FDA. However, the failure to obtain approval in one jurisdiction may compromise our ability to obtain approval elsewhere. We may not be able to file for marketing approvals and may not receive necessary approvals to commercialize our products in any market.

We may be subject to fines, penalties, injunctions, or other enforcement actions if we are determined to be promoting the use of our products, if approved, for unapproved or “off-label” uses, resulting in damage to our reputation and business.

We must comply with requirements concerning advertising and promotion for any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. Promotional communications with respect to therapeutics are subject to a variety of legal and regulatory restrictions and continuing review by the FDA, Department of Justice, Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General, state attorneys general, members of Congress, and the public. When the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities issue regulatory approval for a product candidate, the regulatory approval is limited to those specific uses and indications for which a product is approved. We may not market or promote them for other indications and uses, referred to as off-label uses. We further must be able to sufficiently substantiate any claims that we make for our products, if approved, including claims comparing our products to other companies’ products and must abide by the FDA’s strict requirements regarding the content of promotion and advertising. While physicians may choose to prescribe products for uses that are not described in the product’s labeling and for uses that differ from those tested in clinical studies and approved by the regulatory

Table of Contents

authorities, we are prohibited from marketing and promoting the products for indications and uses that are not specifically approved by the FDA.

If we are found to have impermissibly promoted any of our product candidates, we may become subject to significant liability and government fines. The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations regarding product promotion, particularly those prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted a product may be subject to significant sanctions. The federal government has levied large civil and criminal fines against companies for alleged improper promotion and has enjoined several companies from engaging in off-label promotion. The FDA has also requested that companies enter into consent decrees of permanent injunctions under which specified promotional conduct is changed or curtailed.

In the United States, engaging in the impermissible promotion of our products, following approval, for off-label uses can also subject us to false claims and other litigation under federal and state statutes, including fraud and abuse and consumer protection laws. Such litigation can lead to civil and criminal penalties and fines, agreements with governmental authorities that materially restrict the manner in which we promote or distribute therapeutic products and do business through, for example, corporate integrity agreements, suspension or exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs, suspension and debarment from government contracts, and refusal of orders under existing government contracts. These false claims statutes include the federal civil FCA, which allows any individual to bring a lawsuit against a company on behalf of the federal government ("qui tam" action) alleging submission of false or fraudulent claims, or causing others to present such false or fraudulent claims, for payment by a federal program such as Medicare or Medicaid. If the government decides to intervene and prevails in the lawsuit, the individual will share in the proceeds from any fines or settlement funds. If the government declines to intervene, the individual may pursue the case alone. These FCA lawsuits against sponsors of drugs and biologics have increased significantly in volume and breadth in recent years, leading to several substantial civil and criminal settlements, up to $3.0 billion, pertaining to certain sales practices and promoting off-label uses. In addition, FCA lawsuits may expose sponsors to follow-on claims by private payors based on fraudulent marketing practices. This growth in litigation has increased the risk that companies will have to defend a false claim action, and pay settlements fines or restitution, as well as criminal and civil penalties, agree to comply with burdensome reporting and compliance obligations, and be excluded from Medicare, Medicaid, or other federal and state healthcare programs. If we do not lawfully promote our approved products, if any, we may become subject to such litigation and, if we do not successfully defend against such actions, those actions may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

In the United States, the distribution of product samples to physicians must further comply with the requirements of the United States PDMA, and the promotion of biologic and pharmaceutical products are subject to additional FDA requirements and restrictions on promotional statements. If the FDA determines that our promotional activities violate our regulations and policies pertaining to product promotion, it could request that we modify our promotional materials or subject us to regulatory or other enforcement actions, including issuance of warning letters or untitled letters, suspension or withdrawal of an approved product from the market, requests for recalls, payment of civil fines, disgorgement of money, imposition of operating restrictions, injunctions or criminal prosecution, and other enforcement actions. These regulatory and enforcement actions could significantly harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Even if our product candidates receive regulatory approval, we will be subject to ongoing obligations and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional expense.

Any product candidate for which we obtain marketing approval will be subject to extensive and ongoing requirements of and review by the FDA and other regulatory authorities, including requirements related to the manufacturing processes, post-approval clinical data, labeling, packaging, distribution, adverse event reporting, storage, recordkeeping, export, import, advertising, marketing, and promotional activities for such product. These requirements further include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information, including manufacturing deviations and reports, registration and listing requirements, the payment of annual fees, continued compliance with current GMP requirements relating to manufacturing, quality control, quality assurance, and corresponding maintenance of records and documents, requirements regarding the distribution of samples to physicians and GCPs, for any clinical trials that we conduct post-approval.

Even if marketing approval of a product candidate is granted, the approval may be subject to limitations on the indicated uses and populations for which the product may be marketed or to the conditions of approval, including significant safety warnings, such as boxed warnings, contraindications, and precautions that are not desirable for successful commercialization. Any approved products may also be subject to a REMS that render the approved product not commercially viable or other post-market requirements, such as Phase 4 studies, or restrictions. If the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities become aware of new safety information after the approval of any of our product candidates, they may, among other actions, withdraw approval, require labeling changes or establishment of a REMS or similar strategy, impose significant restrictions on a

Table of Contents

product’s indicated uses or marketing, or impose ongoing requirements for potentially costly post-approval studies or post-market surveillance.

We and any of our collaborators, including our contract manufacturers, could be subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA to monitor and ensure compliance with current GMP and other FDA regulatory requirements. Application holders must further notify the FDA, and depending on the nature of the change, obtain FDA pre-approval for product and manufacturing changes.

In addition, later discovery of previously unknown adverse events or that the product is less effective than previously thought or other problems with our products, manufacturers, or manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements both before and after approval, may yield various results, including:

•restrictions on manufacturing, distribution, or marketing of such products;

•restrictions on the labeling, including restrictions on the indication or approved patient population, and required additional warnings, such as black box warnings, contraindications, and precautions;

•modifications to promotional pieces;

•issuance of corrective information;

•requirements to conduct post-marketing studies or other clinical trials;

•clinical holds or termination of clinical trials;

•requirements to establish or modify a REMS, or a comparable foreign authority may require that we establish or modify a similar strategy;

•liability for harm caused to patients or subjects;

•reputational harm;

•warning, untitled, Form 483s, or cyber letters;

•suspension of marketing or withdrawal or recall of the products from the market;

•regulatory authority issuance of safety alerts, Dear Healthcare Provider letters, press releases, or other communications containing warnings or other safety information about the product;

•refusal to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications that we submit;

•fines, restitution, or disgorgement of profits or revenues;

•suspension or withdrawal of marketing approvals;

•refusal to permit the import or export of our products;

•product seizure or detention;

•FDA debarment, suspension and debarment from government contracts, and refusal of orders under existing government contracts, exclusion from federal healthcare programs, consent decrees, or corporate integrity agreements; or

•injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties, including imprisonment.

Any of these events could prevent us from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of the particular product candidate, if approved, or could substantially increase the costs and expenses of developing and commercializing such product, which in turn could delay or prevent us from generating significant revenues from its sale. Any of these events could further have other material and adverse effects on our operations and business and could adversely impact our stock price and could significantly harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

The FDA’s policies may change, and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit, or delay regulatory approval of our product candidates, limit the marketability of our product candidates, or impose additional regulatory obligations on us. Changes in medical practice and standard of care may also impact the marketability of our product candidates, if approved.

We will need to obtain FDA approval of any proposed product names, and any failure or delay associated with such approval may adversely affect our business.

Table of Contents

Any name we intend to use for our product candidates will require approval from the FDA regardless of whether we have secured a formal trademark registration from the USPTO. The FDA typically conducts a review of proposed product names, including an evaluation of the potential for confusion with other product names. The FDA may also object to a product name if it believes the name inappropriately implies medical claims or contributes to an overstatement of efficacy. If the FDA objects to any of our proposed product names, we may be required to adopt alternative names for our product candidates. If we adopt alternative names, we would lose the benefit of any existing trademark applications for such product candidate and may be required to expend significant additional resources in an effort to identify a suitable product name that would qualify under applicable trademark laws, not infringe upon the existing rights of third-parties, and be acceptable to the FDA. We may be unable to build a successful brand identity for a new trademark in a timely manner or at all, which would limit our ability to commercialize our product candidates, if approved.

Geopolitical events and conditions could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Changes in U.S. government and other nations’ administrations and their associated shifts in policy and priorities could also impact our operations and market conditions. Our business is highly sensitive to geopolitical issues, including foreign policy actions taken by governments such as tariffs, sanctions, embargoes, export and import controls, and other trade restrictions, which can affect the demand for, and our ability to sell, our products and services, cause disruptions to our supply chain, and, ultimately, could adversely affect our business. Global conflicts, including Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, conflicts in the Middle East, and heightened tensions in the Pacific region, have significantly elevated global geopolitical tensions and security concerns. Economic sanctions, export controls, and other trade restrictions, for instance those that the U.S. Government and other nations implemented against Russia in light of its invasion of Ukraine or those relating to the conflict in the Middle East, could directly and indirectly result in the disruption of our business and supply chain. Although we do not have any clinical trial sites or operations in the currently affected regions, if the current conflict expands further into the region or continues, resulting heightened economic sanctions from the United States and the international community, in addition to environmental regulations, could limit our ability to procure or use certain materials or manufacturing slots for the products needed for our clinical trials, which could lead to delays in these trials.

However, portions of our clinical trials are conducted outside of the United States, such as our Phase 3 liMeliGhT clinical trial for OCU400 for the treatment of RP in Canada, and unfavorable economic conditions resulting in the weakening of the U.S. dollar would make those clinical trials more costly to operate. Significant political, trade, or regulatory developments in the jurisdictions in which we sell our products, if approved, such as those stemming from the change in U.S. federal administration, are difficult to predict and may have a material adverse effect on us. Similarly, changes in U.S. federal policy that affect the geopolitical landscape could give rise to circumstances outside our control that could have negative impacts on our business operations. For example, on February 1, 2025, the U.S. imposed a 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico, which were subsequently suspended for a period of one month, and a 10% additional tariff on imports from China. Historically, tariffs have led to increased trade and political tensions.In response to tariffs, other countries have implemented retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods. Political tensions as a result of trade policies could reduce trade volume, investment, technological exchange and other economic activities between major international economies, resulting in a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets. Any changes in political, trade, regulatory, and economic conditions, including U.S. trade policies, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Specifically, changes in the economic, political, legal and social conditions and policies of the Chinese government or in relations between China and the United States may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, access to capital, and the market price of our common stock.

We have a co-development and commercialization agreement with CanSinoBIO with respect to the development and commercialization of our modifier gene therapy platform including OCU400, OCU410 and OCU410ST as well as manufacturing part of our inhaled mucosal vaccine platform including OCU500, and as a result, have significant operations in China. Due to our operations in China, our business, results of operations, financial condition, access to capital, market price of our common stock and prospects may be influenced to a significant degree by economic, political, legal and social conditions in China or changes in government relations between China and the United States or other governments. Furthermore, we face the risk that our business operations in China will be impacted by government regulations and/or foreign sanctions. Escalation of current geopolitical tensions may implicate China and could increase the risk of government regulations and/or foreign sanctions and imposition of export controls and import restrictions. In addition, our information technology systems may be at risk of being blocked from our world-wide operations. Ongoing human rights concerns in China may result in boycotts of our services or client requests not to use Chinese operations to support their projects.

In addition, the U.S. Congress has previously considered – and is anticipated to consider in the future – legislative proposals such as the BIOSECURE ACT that, if enacted, could negatively impact the United States funding for certain biotechnology

Table of Contents

providers having relationships with foreign adversaries or which pose a threat to national security, including entities located in China. The potential downstream adverse impacts on entities having only commercial relationships with any impacted biotechnology providers is unknown but may include supply chain disruptions or delays.

Inadequate funding for the FDA, the SEC and other government agencies, including from government shut downs, or other disruptions to these agencies’ operations could hinder their ability to hire and retain key leadership and other personnel, prevent new products and services from being developed or commercialized in a timely manner or otherwise prevent those agencies from performing normal business functions on which the operation of our business may rely, which could negatively impact our business

Currently, federal agencies in the US are operating under a continuing resolution that is set to expire on March 14, 2025. Without appropriation of additional funding to federal agencies, our business operations related to our product development activities for the US market could be impacted. The ability of the FDA to review and approve new products can be affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and funding levels, the ability to hire and retain key personnel and accept the payment of user fees, and statutory, regulatory and policy changes. Average review times at the agency have fluctuated in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of the SEC and other government agencies on which our operations may rely, including those that fund research and development activities, is subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and unpredictable.

Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time necessary for new product candidates to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary government agencies, which would adversely affect our business. If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, it could significantly impact the ability of the FDA to timely review and process our regulatory submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, future government shutdowns could impact our ability to access the public markets and obtain necessary capital in order to properly capitalize and continue our operations.

The U.S. Congress, the Trump administration, or any new administration may make substantial changes to fiscal, tax, and other federal policies that may adversely affect our business.

In 2017, The U.S. Congress and the Trump administration made substantial changes to U.S. policies, which included comprehensive corporate and individual tax reform. In addition, the Trump administration called for significant changes to U.S. trade, healthcare, immigration and government regulatory policy. With the transition to the Biden administration in early 2021, changes to U. S. policy occurred and since the start of the Trump Administration in 2025, U.S. policy changes have been implemented at a rapid pace and additional changes are likely. Changes to U.S. policy implemented by the U.S. Congress, the Trump administration or any new administration have impacted and may in the future impact, among other things, the U.S. and global economy, international trade relations, unemployment, immigration, healthcare, taxation, the U.S. regulatory environment, inflation and other areas. Although we cannot predict the impact, if any, of these changes to our business, they could adversely affect our business. Until we know what policy changes are made, whether those policy changes are challenged and subsequently upheld by the court system and how those changes impact our business and the business of our competitors over the long term, we will not know if, overall, we will benefit from them or be negatively affected by them.

Risks Related to the Commercialization of Our Product Candidates

We have no prior experience in the marketing, sale, and distribution of biotechnology products and there can be no assurance that our product candidates, if approved, will be successfully commercialized.

We have no prior experience in the marketing, sale, and distribution of biotechnology products, and there are significant risks involved in the building and managing of a commercial infrastructure. The establishment and development of commercial capabilities, including compliance plans, to market any products we may develop will be expensive and time-consuming and could delay any product launch, and we may not be able to successfully develop this capability. We will have to compete with other pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies to recruit, hire, train, manage, and retain marketing and sales personnel. Factors that may inhibit our efforts to commercialize our product candidates include:

•the inability to recruit, train, manage, and retain adequate numbers of effective sales and marketing personnel;

•the inability of sales personnel to obtain access to physicians or persuade adequate numbers of physicians to prescribe our product candidates;

•our inability to effectively oversee a geographically dispersed sales and marketing team;

•the costs associated with training sales and marketing personnel on legal and regulatory compliance matters and monitoring their actions;

•an inability to secure adequate coverage and reimbursement by government and private health plans;

Table of Contents

•reduced realization on government sales from mandatory discounts, rebates and fees, and from price concessions to private health plans and pharmacy benefit managers necessitated by competition for access to managed formularies;

•the clinical indications for which the products are approved and the claims that we may make for the products;

•limitations or warnings, including distribution or use restrictions, contained in the products' approved labeling;

•any distribution and use restrictions imposed by the FDA or other foreign regulatory agencies, including those that we may agree to as part of a mandatory REMS or voluntary risk management plan;

•liability for sales or marketing personnel who fail to comply with the applicable legal and regulatory requirements;

•the lack of complementary products to be offered by sales personnel, which may put us at a competitive disadvantage relative to companies with more extensive product lines; and

•unforeseen costs and expenses associated with creating an independent sales and marketing organization or engaging a contract sales organization.

Should any of the foregoing occur, we may not be successful in commercializing any product candidates for which we receive marketing approval.

If we obtain approval to commercialize our product candidates outside of the United States, a variety of risks associated with international operations could materially adversely affect our business.

If any of our product candidates are approved for commercialization, we may enter into agreements with third parties to market them on a worldwide basis or in more limited geographical regions. We expect that we will be subject to additional risks related to conducting marketing and sales activities in international jurisdictions and entering into international business relationships, including:

•different regulatory requirements for approval of drugs and biologics in foreign countries;

•the potential for so-called parallel importing, which is what happens when a local seller, faced with high or higher local prices, opts to import goods from a foreign market (with low or lower prices) rather than buying them locally;

•challenges enforcing our contractual and intellectual property rights, especially in those foreign countries that do not respect and protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the United States;

•the need to seek additional patent approvals, licenses to patents held by third parties, and/or face claims of infringing third-party patent rights;

•tariffs (including tariffs that have been or may in the future be imposed by the United States or other countries), trade protection measures, import or export licensing requirements, trade embargoes, sanctions (including those administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury), other trade barriers (including further legislation or actions taken by the United States or other countries that restrict trade), and protectionist or retaliatory measures taken by the United States or other countries;

•economic weakness, including inflation or political instability in particular foreign economies and markets;

•compliance with tax, employment, immigration, and labor laws for employees living or traveling abroad;

•foreign currency fluctuations, which could result in increased operating expenses and reduced revenues, and other obligations incident to doing business in another country;

•difficulties staffing and managing foreign operations;

•workforce uncertainty in countries where labor unrest is more common than in the United States;

•potential liability under the FCPA, the U.K. Bribery Act 2010 (the "Bribery Act"), or other comparable foreign regulations;

•production shortages resulting from any events affecting raw material supply or manufacturing capabilities abroad; and

•business interruptions resulting from geopolitical actions, including war and terrorism, or natural disasters including pandemics or other outbreaks of infectious disease, earthquakes, typhoons, floods, and fires.

These and other risks associated with international operations may materially adversely affect our ability to attain or maintain profitable operations.

Table of Contents

If we are unable to establish effective marketing and sales capabilities or enter into agreements with third parties to market and sell our product candidates, if approved, we may be unable to generate product revenues.

We currently do not have a commercial infrastructure for the marketing, sale, and distribution of biotechnology products. If approved, in order to commercialize our products, we must build our marketing, sales, and distribution capabilities or make arrangements with third parties to perform these services. If we do not establish sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities successfully, either on our own or in collaboration with third parties, we will not be successful in commercializing any product candidates for which we receive marketing approval.

Subject to regulatory approval of any of our product candidates, we may build a commercial team of specialty sales and marketing representatives in support of our product candidates that we develop in the United States or other foreign countries, if approved, as well as distribution capabilities. There are risks involved with us establishing our own sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities. Recruiting and training a sales force is expensive and time-consuming, particularly to the extent that we seek to commercialize any product, if approved, for an indication, such as dAMD, that has a large patient population. We will be competing with many companies that currently have extensive and well-funded marketing and sales operations to recruit, hire, train, and retain marketing and sales personnel. Further, we may underestimate the size of the sales force required for a successful product launch and may need to expand our sales force earlier and at a higher cost than we anticipate. If the commercial launch of our product candidates, if approved, for which we recruit a sales force and establish marketing capabilities is delayed or does not occur for any reason, we would have prematurely or unnecessarily incurred these commercialization expenses. This may be costly, and our investment would be lost if we cannot retain or reposition our sales and marketing personnel.

We may also or alternatively decide to collaborate with a third-party or contract sales organization to commercialize any approved product candidates, in which event, our ability to generate product revenues may be limited. Our product revenues and our profitability, if any, under any third-party collaboration, distribution, or other marketing arrangements are likely to be lower than if we were to market, sell, and distribute the applicable product candidate, if approved, entirely ourselves. We may not be successful in entering into arrangements with third parties to sell, market, and distribute our product candidates, if approved, or may be unable to do so on terms that are favorable to us. In addition, we would have less control over the sales efforts of any other third parties involved in our commercialization efforts and any of them may fail to devote the necessary resources and attention to sell and market our product candidates, if approved, effectively. We could also be held liable if such third parties failed to comply with applicable legal or regulatory requirements.

In the event we are unable to develop a team of marketing and sales representatives or to establish an effective third-party contractual relationship for such services, we may not be able to commercialize our product candidates, if approved, which would limit our ability to generate product revenues. Even if we are able to effectively hire a sales force and develop a marketing and sales infrastructure, our sales force and marketing teams may not be successful in commercializing our product candidates, if approved.

We face significant competition from other pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic institutions, government agencies, and other research organizations. Our operating results will suffer if we fail to compete effectively.

The biotechnology industry is characterized by rapidly advancing technologies as well as a strong emphasis on intellectual property leading to a highly competitive environment for the development and commercialization of therapeutic products, regenerative medicines, and vaccines. We face competition with respect to our current product candidates and will face competition with respect to any product candidates that we may seek to develop or commercialize in the future. We face competition from many different sources, including from major pharmaceutical companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, academic institutions, government agencies, and other public and private research organizations that conduct research, seek patent protection, and establish collaborative arrangements for research, development, manufacturing, and commercialization.

The development and commercialization of gene therapies is highly competitive. We are aware of several companies focusing on gene therapies for various ophthalmic indications including Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation, as acquired by Syncona Limited, Astellas Pharma Inc., MeiraGTx Holdings plc in partnership with Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Nanoscope Therapeutics Inc., REGENXBIO Inc., Novartis AG, Roche AG, Kiora Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Genentech, Inc. in partnership with Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc., and Spark Therapeutics, Inc. Luxturna, the product developed by Spark Therapeutics, Inc. and marketed by Roche AG, is currently the only gene therapy approved to treat IRDs in the United States which addresses only mutations in the RPE65 gene. The mutation associated with the RPE65 gene represents just one of more than 125 mutated genes linked to RP and LCA.

Table of Contents

The regenerative medicine sector is characterized by innovative science, rapidly advancing technologies, and a strong emphasis on proprietary products. The competitive landscape in the field of articular cartilage repair in the United States is emerging and has stimulated a substantial amount of interest from companies developing tissue repair solutions. Products that may compete with our NeoCart product candidate include Vericel Corporation's MACI, the only FDA-approved ACI product in the United States, and Aesculap Biologics, LLC's NOVOCART 3D, which is currently enrolling subjects in their Phase 3 clinical trial.

We face, and will continue to face, intense competition from companies as well as institutions that are pursuing or have commercialized vaccines that would compete with our inhaled mucosal vaccine platform, if commercialized. The competitive landscape of COVID-19 vaccines includes competitors such as Pfizer Inc./BioNTech SE, Moderna, Inc., AstraZeneca PLC, Novavax, Inc., Sinovac Biotech Ltd., Gamaleya Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, and Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology. Each of the aforementioned vaccines have been authorized or approved in at least one country within the Ocugen Mucosal Vaccine Territory and are intramuscular vaccines. CanSinoBIO's Convidecia Air, an intranasal vaccine targeting COVID-19, has been approved in China. Other competitors for our novel inhaled mucosal vaccine platform include CyanVac LLC, Meissa Vaccines, Inc., Codagenix, Inc., Intravacc B.V., McMaster University, and Tetherex Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Companies such as Pfizer Inc./BioNTech SE, Moderna, Inc., CureVac N.V in partnership with GSK plc, Vivaldi Biosciences Inc., and Novavax, Inc. are also in the process of developing a combination vaccine that will protect against COVID-19 and the seasonal flu. Vivaldi Biosciences Inc. is also currently undergoing clinical trials for their intranasal vaccine for the seasonal flu.

The development and commercialization of biologic products is highly competitive as well. Companies that may compete with our OCU200 product candidate include Roche AG, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AsclepiX Therapeutics, Inc., Outlook Therapeutics, Inc., Novartis AG, Oxurion NV, Unity Biotechnology, Inc., Opthea Limited, and 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Inc. Roche AG, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Novartis AG have marketed anti-VEGF products.

Our commercial opportunities could be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and commercialize products that are safer, more effective, have fewer or less severe side effects, are more convenient or are less expensive than any products that we may develop and for which we receive approval. Our competitors also may obtain FDA or other regulatory approval for their products more rapidly than we may obtain approval for our product candidates, which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we are able to enter the market. They may obtain patent protection or other intellectual property rights that allow them to develop and commercialize their products before us and could limit our ability to develop or commercialize our product candidates.

In addition, our ability to compete may be affected in many cases by insurers or other third-party payors' coverage decisions, particularly Medicare, seeking to encourage the use of generic or biosimilar products. Many of the products that will compete with our product candidates, if approved, are available on a generic basis, and our product candidates may not demonstrate sufficient additional clinical benefits to clinicians, patients, or payors to justify a higher price compared to generic products. Additional competing products are expected to become available on a generic basis over the coming years.

Many of the companies against which we are competing or against which we may compete in the future have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals, and marketing approved products than we do. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. Early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These third parties compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel and establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.

If our product candidates for which we receive approval do not achieve broad market acceptance, the revenues that we generate from their sales will be limited.

Even if our product candidates are approved by the appropriate regulatory authorities for marketing and sale, they may not gain acceptance among physicians, patients, third-party payors, and others in the medical community. Physicians are often reluctant to switch their patients and patients may be reluctant to switch from existing therapies even when new and potentially more effective or safer treatments enter the market. We have never commercialized a product candidate for any indication, and efforts to educate the medical community and third-party payors on the benefits of our product candidates may require significant resources and may not be successful. With respect to our product candidates being developed based on our modifier gene therapy platform, market acceptance may also be constrained by ethical, social, and legal concerns about gene therapy and genetic research, which could result in additional regulations restricting or prohibiting the products and processes we may use. The novelty of the technology and any negative publicity surrounding adverse events associated with gene therapy may also

Table of Contents

prevent the medical community, patients, and third-party payors from accepting gene therapy products in general, and our product candidates in particular, as medically useful, cost-effective, and safe.

Market acceptance of our product candidates by the medical community, patients, and third-party payors will depend on a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control. If any product candidates for which we obtain regulatory approval does not gain an adequate level of market acceptance, it may not generate significant product revenues or become profitable.

The degree of market acceptance of any of our product candidates will depend on a number of factors, including:

•the efficacy of our product candidates;

•the prevalence and severity of adverse events associated with such product candidates;

•the clinical indications for which the product candidates are approved and the approved claims that we may make for the products;

•limitations or warnings contained in the product's FDA-approved labeling, including potential limitations or warnings for such product candidates that may be more restrictive than other competitive products;

•changes in the standard of care for the targeted indications for such product candidates, which could reduce the marketing impact of any claims that we could make following FDA approval, if obtained;

•the relative convenience and ease of administration of such product candidates;

•cost of treatment versus economic and clinical benefit in relation to alternative treatments or therapies;

•the availability of third-party formulary coverage and adequate coverage or reimbursement by third parties, such as insurance companies and other healthcare payors, and by government healthcare programs, including Medicaid and particularly by Medicare in light of the prevalence of retinal diseases in persons over age 55;

•the price concessions required by third party payors to obtain coverage;

•the extent and strength of our manufacturing, marketing, and distribution of such product candidates;

•distribution and use restrictions imposed by the FDA with respect to such product candidates or to which we agree as part of a REMS or voluntary risk management plan;

•the extent of availability of generic or biosimilar versions of any products that compete with any of our product candidates and the extent to which they are offered at a substantially lower price than we expect to offer for our product candidates, if approved;

•adverse publicity about the product or favorable publicity about competitive products; and

•potential product liability claims.

If the market opportunities for our product candidates are smaller than we believe, our revenue may be adversely affected, and our business may suffer.

The potential market opportunities for our product candidates are difficult to precisely estimate. Our estimates of the potential market opportunities are predicated on many assumptions, which may include industry knowledge and publications, third-party research reports, and other surveys, some of which we may have commissioned. Industry publications and third-party research, surveys and studies generally indicate that their information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, although they do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information. While we believe these industry publications and third-party research, surveys, and studies are reliable, we have not independently verified such data. In addition, while we believe that our internal assumptions are reasonable, these assumptions involve the exercise of significant judgment on the part of our management, are inherently uncertain, and the reasonableness of these assumptions has not been assessed by an independent source. If any assumptions prove to be inaccurate, the actual markets for our product candidates could be smaller than our estimates of the potential market opportunities, and as a result, our product revenue may be limited, and it may be more difficult for us to achieve or maintain profitability.

If third-party payors do not reimburse patients for our products candidates, if approved, or if reimbursement levels are set too low for us to sell our product candidates at a profit, our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates, if approved, and our results of operations will be harmed.

Our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates, if approved, will depend in part on the extent to which coverage and adequate reimbursement for our product candidates will be available in a timely manner from third-party payors,

Table of Contents

including governmental healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, commercial health insurers, and managed care organizations. This is particularly true with respect to OCU200, our novel biologic product candidate, in the case of Wet AMD, which is most prevalent in persons over age 55. Government authorities and other third-party payors, such as private health insurers and health maintenance organizations, determine which medications they will cover and establish reimbursement levels. Reimbursement decisions by particular third-party payors depend upon a number of factors, including each third-party payor's determination that use of a product is:

•a covered benefit under its health plan;

•appropriate and medically necessary for the specific condition or disease;

•cost effective; and

•neither experimental nor investigational.

Obtaining coverage and reimbursement approval for our product candidates from government authorities or other third-party payors may be a time consuming and costly process that could require us to provide supporting scientific, clinical, and cost-effectiveness data, including expensive pharmacoeconomic studies beyond the data required to obtain marketing approval, for the use of each product candidate to each government authority or other third-party payor. We may not be able to provide data sufficient to gain acceptance with respect to coverage and reimbursement.

Third-party payors may deny reimbursement for covered products if they determine that a medical product was not used in accordance with cost-effective diagnosis methods, as determined by the third-party payor, or was used for an unapproved indication. Third-party payors also may refuse to reimburse for procedures and devices deemed to be experimental. Third-party payors may also limit coverage to specific products on an approved list, or formulary, which might not include all of the approved products for a particular indication.

Increasingly, third-party payors are also requiring that drug companies provide them with predetermined discounts from list prices and are challenging the prices charged for medical products. These third-party payors could also impose price controls and other conditions that must be met by patients prior to providing coverage for use of our product candidates, if approved. For example, insurers may establish a "step-edit" system that requires a patient to first use a lower price alternative product prior to becoming eligible for reimbursement of a higher price product.

Third-party payors also attempt to contain healthcare costs by limiting both coverage and the level of reimbursement for medical products and services. The process for determining whether a payor will provide coverage for a product may be separate from the process of setting the price or reimbursement rate that the payor will pay for the product once coverage is approved. Levels of reimbursement may also decrease in the future, and legislation, regulation, or reimbursement policies of third-party payors may adversely affect the demand for and reimbursement available for our product candidates, which in turn, could negatively impact pricing. If patients are not adequately reimbursed for our product candidates, if approved, they may reduce or discontinue purchases of our product candidates, which would result in a significant shortfall in achieving revenue expectations and negatively impact our business, prospects, and financial condition. For example, the IRA contains substantial drug pricing reforms, including the establishment of a drug price negotiation program within the United States Department of Health and Human Services that would require manufacturers to charge a negotiated "maximum fair price" for certain selected drugs administered or prescribed to Medicare beneficiaries or pay an excise tax for noncompliance; the establishment of rebate payment requirements on manufacturers of certain drugs payable under Medicare Parts B and D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation; and a requirement that manufacturers to provide discounts on Part D drugs. Substantial penalties can be assessed for noncompliance with the drug pricing provisions in the IRA. The IRA could have the effect of reducing the prices we can charge and reimbursement we receive for our products, if approved, thereby reducing our profitability, and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and growth prospects. The IRA's drug price negotiation provisions are subject to ongoing constitutional challenges, and the effect of IRA on our business and the biotechnology industry in general is not yet known.

As an organization, we have limited experience in the development, manufacturing, distribution, or commercialization of a vaccine candidate.

We have limited experience in the development of vaccine candidates and have never undertaken the manufacturing, distribution, or commercialization of a vaccine candidate, and we may be unable to obtain regulatory authorization or approval. Additionally, development of an effective vaccine candidate depends on the success of our and our partner’s manufacturing capabilities. In addition, the development and manufacture of inhaled mucosal vaccines may prove to be more complex than the development and manufacture of traditional vaccines. Further, we may be unable to effectively create a supply chain for our vaccines that will adequately support demand. We may also face challenges with sourcing a sufficient amount of raw materials

Table of Contents

to support the demand for a vaccine. While we are currently collaborating with NIAID for early clinical studies for the OCU500 program, there can also be no assurance that we will be able to obtain the required funding from government agencies or strategic partners for further development of OCU500 or for development of our vaccine candidates, OCU510 and OCU520.

Due to the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency and decline in vaccination rates, the demand for any COVID-19 vaccine product candidate we develop may decrease significantly.

On May 11, 2023, the United States Department of Health and Human Services announced the COVID-19 public health emergency ended. In addition, the demand for COVID-19 vaccines is becoming more endemic and seasonal. As other companies continue to develop, receive regulatory approval for and commercialize their own COVID-19 vaccines and as demand for such vaccines declines, demand for our COVID-19 product candidates OCU500 and OCU520 may be diminished.

Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties

We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties to conduct, supervise, and monitor our preclinical studies and clinical trials we may initiate, and those third parties may not perform satisfactorily, including failing to meet deadlines for the completion of such preclinical studies or clinical trials or failing to comply with regulatory requirements.

We rely on third parties, study sites, and others to conduct, supervise, and monitor our preclinical and clinical trials for our product candidates. We expect to continue to rely on third parties, such as CDMOs, clinical data management organizations, medical and scientific institutions, and clinical and preclinical investigators to conduct our preclinical studies and clinical trials. We often have to negotiate budgets and contracts with such third parties, and if we are unsuccessful or if the negotiations take longer than anticipated, this could result in delays to our development timelines and increased costs.

While we have, or expect to have, agreements governing the activities of such third parties, we will have limited influence and control over their actual performance and activities. Third-party service providers are not our employees, and except for remedies available to us under agreements with such third parties, we cannot control whether or not they devote sufficient time and resources to our preclinical studies or clinical trials. Nevertheless, we will be responsible for ensuring that each of our preclinical studies and clinical trials is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol and legal, regulatory, and scientific standards, and our reliance on third parties will not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. For example, we will remain responsible for ensuring that each of our trials is conducted in accordance with the general investigational plan and protocols for the trial. We must also ensure that our preclinical studies are conducted in accordance with GLP and under current GMP conditions, as appropriate. Moreover, the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities require us to comply with GCPs for conducting, recording, and reporting the results of clinical trials to assure that data and reported results are credible and accurate and that the rights, integrity, and confidentiality of trial participants are protected. The FDA enforces these GCPs through periodic inspections of trial sponsors, principal investigators, clinical trial sites, and IRBs.

Our failure or any failure by these third parties to comply with these regulations or to recruit a sufficient number of patients may require us to repeat clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process. Moreover, our business may be implicated if any of these third parties violate federal or state fraud and abuse or false claims laws and regulations or healthcare privacy and security laws.

If these third parties upon which we depend do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines, conduct our preclinical studies or any clinical trials in accordance with regulatory requirements or our stated protocols, if they need to be replaced or if the quality or accuracy of the data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our protocols, regulatory requirements, or for other reasons:

•we, our CDMOs, or other third-party collaborators may be subject to regulatory enforcement or other legal actions;

•the data generated in our preclinical studies or clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and our such studies and clinical trials may need to be repeated, extended, delayed, or terminated;

•we may need to identify new CDMOs with which to partner for the supply of our product candidates;

•we may not be able to obtain, or may be delayed in obtaining, marketing approvals for our product candidates; or

•we may not be able to, or may be delayed in our efforts to, successfully commercialize our product candidates, if approved.

We cannot assure you that upon inspection by a given regulatory authority, such regulatory authority will determine that any of our preclinical studies or clinical trials will comply with the applicable regulatory requirements. To the extent we are unable to successfully identify and manage the performance of third-party service providers in the future, our business may be materially

Table of Contents

and adversely affected. As a result, our results of operations and the commercial prospects for our product candidates would be harmed, our costs could increase, and our ability to generate revenues could be delayed.

If we need to identify and retain alternative CDMOs for any reason during our product development programs, the technical skills required to manufacture our product candidates may be unique or proprietary to the original CDMO and we may have difficulty, or there may be contractual restrictions prohibiting us from, transferring such skills to a back-up or alternate supplier, or we may be unable to transfer such skills at all. In addition, if we are required to change CDMOs for any reason, we will be required to verify that the new CDMO maintains facilities and procedures that comply with quality standards and with all applicable regulations. We will also need to verify, such as through a manufacturing comparability study, that any new manufacturing process will produce our product candidate according to the specifications previously submitted to the FDA or another regulatory authority. The delays associated with the verification of a new CDMO could negatively affect our ability to develop product candidates or commercialize our products in a timely manner or within budget. Furthermore, a CDMO may possess technology related to the manufacture of our product candidate that such CDMO owns independently. This would increase our reliance on such CDMO or require us to obtain a license from such CDMO in order to have another CDMO manufacture our product candidates. In addition, changes in manufacturers often involve changes in manufacturing procedures and processes, which could require that we conduct bridging studies between our prior clinical supply used in our clinical trials and that of any new manufacturer. We may be unsuccessful in demonstrating the comparability of clinical supplies which could require the conduct of additional clinical trials.

Our reliance on third parties for clinical trials will entail additional risks. Our third-party service providers may have relationships with other entities, some of which may be our competitors, for whom they may also be conducting clinical trials or other therapeutic development activities that could harm our competitive position. In addition, we will be required to report certain financial interests of our third-party investigators if these relationships exceed certain financial thresholds or meet other criteria. The FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may question the integrity of the data from those clinical trials conducted by investigators who may have conflicts of interest. Lastly, we are required to register certain clinical trials and post the results of certain completed clinical trials on a government-sponsored database, clinicaltrials.gov, within specified timeframes. Failure to do so can result in enforcement actions and adverse publicity.

Agreements with third parties conducting or otherwise assisting with our clinical or preclinical studies might terminate for a variety of reasons, including a failure to perform by the third parties. If any of our relationships with these third parties terminate, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative providers or do so on commercially reasonable terms. Switching or adding additional third parties involves additional cost and requires management time and focus. In addition, there is a natural transition period when a new third party commences work. As a result, if we need to enter into alternative arrangements, it could delay our product development activities and adversely affect our business. Though we intend to carefully manage our relationships with third parties, there can be no assurance that we will not encounter challenges or delays in the future or that these delays or challenges will not have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, prospects, and results of operations.

We will also rely on other third parties to store and distribute our product candidates for preclinical purposes or clinical trials that we conduct. Any performance failure on the part of our distributors could delay development, marketing approval, or commercialization of our product candidates, if approved, producing additional losses and depriving us of potential product revenue.

If we encounter difficulties in negotiating commercial manufacturing and supply agreements with third-party manufacturers and suppliers of our product candidates or any product components, our ability to commercialize our product candidates, if approved, would be impaired.

We have entered into a strategic partnership with CanSinoBIO to manufacture our modifier gene therapy pipeline product candidates. Under this agreement, CanSinoBIO is responsible for the CMC development and manufacture of clinical supplies for OCU400, OCU410 and OCU410ST. The agreement also provides commercialization rights to CanSinoBIO in Greater China. This agreement may be adversely affected if the United States government were to impose restrictions related to goods manufactured in or imported from China.

We expect to rely on our qualified suppliers and other third parties to manufacture clinical supplies of our product candidates and commercial supplies of our products, if and when approved for marketing by applicable regulatory authorities, as well as for packaging, serialization, storage, distribution, and other production logistics. We, however, may not succeed in our efforts to establish manufacturing relationships or other alternative arrangements for any of our product candidates, components, and programs, or may be unable to do so on commercially favorable terms. If we are unable to enter into such agreements on commercially favorable terms, our future profit margins would be adversely affected and our ability to commercialize any

Table of Contents

products that receive marketing approval on a timely and competitive basis would be impaired. As a result, our business, financial condition, and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.

If the manufacturers upon whom we rely on fail to produce our product candidates or product components pursuant to the terms of contractual arrangements with us or fail to comply with stringent regulations applicable to biotechnology manufacturers, we may face delays in the development and commercialization of, or be unable to meet demand for, our product candidates, if approved, and may lose potential revenues.

We rely on third-party contract manufacturers to manufacture some of our pre-clinical product candidate supplies and some of our clinical trial product supplies and, if approved, will rely on third-party contract manufacturers to manufacture some of our commercial product supplies, including all of our drug substance, vialing, labeling, and packaging. We do not own manufacturing facilities for producing any clinical trial or commercial product supplies. There can be no assurance that our preclinical, clinical development, and, if approved, commercial product supplies will not be limited or interrupted, including as a result of impacts of current macroeconomic and geopolitical events, increasing rates of inflation, rising interest rates, or that our product supplies will be of satisfactory quality or continue to be available at acceptable prices.

As with the third parties on which we rely or expect to rely for our preclinical activities and clinical trials, we have agreements governing the activities of our manufacturers but have limited influence and control over their actual performance and activities. Our third-party manufacturers are not our employees, and except for remedies available to us under our agreements with such third parties, we cannot control whether or not they devote sufficient time and resources to our manufacturing requirements. If these third-party manufacturers do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines or manufacture our product candidates in accordance with regulatory requirements, and if there are disagreements between us and such parties, clinical development or marketing approval of our product candidates could be delayed.

The manufacture of biotechnology products requires significant expertise and capital investment, including the development of advanced manufacturing techniques and process controls. Manufacturers of therapeutics often encounter difficulties in production, particularly in scaling up initial production. These problems include difficulties with production costs and yields, quality control, including stability of the product candidate and quality assurance testing, shortages of qualified personnel, and compliance with strictly enforced federal, state, and foreign regulations. If our manufacturers were to encounter any of these difficulties and were unable to perform as agreed, our ability to provide product candidates to patients in our clinical trials and for commercial use, if approved, would be jeopardized.

In addition, all manufacturers of our product candidates and therapeutic substances must comply with current GMP requirements enforced by the FDA that are applicable to both finished products and their active components used for both clinical and commercial supply. The FDA enforces these requirements through its facilities inspection program. Our manufacturers must be approved by the FDA pursuant to inspections that will be conducted after we submit our marketing applications to the agency. Our manufacturers will also be subject to continuing FDA and other regulatory authority inspections should we receive marketing approval. Further, we, in cooperation with our contract manufacturers, must supply all necessary CMC documentation to the FDA in support of a marketing application on a timely basis.

The current GMP requirements include quality control, quality assurance, and the maintenance of records and documentation. Manufacturers of our product candidates, therapeutic substances, and the active pharmaceutical ingredients necessary to produce our product candidates may be unable to comply with our specifications, current GMP requirements, and with other FDA, state, and foreign regulatory requirements. Poor control of production processes can lead to the introduction of adventitious agents or other contaminants, or to inadvertent changes in the properties or stability of a product candidate that may not be detectable in final product testing. If our contract manufacturers cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the strict regulatory requirements of the FDA or other regulatory authorities, they will not be able to secure or maintain regulatory approval for their manufacturing facilities. Any such deviations may also require remedial measures that may be costly and/or time-consuming for us or a third party to implement and that may include the temporary or permanent suspension of a clinical trial or commercial sales or the temporary or permanent closure of a facility. Any resulting delays in obtaining products, if approved, or product candidates that comply with the applicable regulatory requirements may result in delays to clinical trials, product approvals, and commercialization. It may also require that we conduct additional studies.

While we are ultimately responsible for the manufacture of our product candidates, other than through our contractual arrangements, we have little control over our manufacturers’ compliance with these regulations and standards. A failure to comply with the applicable regulatory requirements may result in regulatory enforcement actions against our manufacturers or us, including fines and civil and criminal penalties, including imprisonment, suspension or restrictions of production, injunctions, delays, withdrawal or denial of product approval or supplements to approved products, clinical holds or termination

Table of Contents

of clinical studies, warning or untitled letters, Form 483s, regulatory authority communications warning the public about safety issues with the product, refusal to permit the import or export of the products, product seizure, detention, or recall, operating restrictions, suits under the civil FCA, corporate integrity agreements, or consent decrees. Depending on the severity of any potential regulatory action, our clinical or commercial supply could be interrupted or limited, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

OCGN US Equity

OCGN · 10-K · period ended 2024-12-31

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

OCGN US Equity☆

OCGN · 10-K · period ended 2024-12-31

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

OCGN US Equity