Skip to content
KStart free
AI InfrastructureDefenseQuantumAll studies →

NHI US Equity

National Health Investors IncReal Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · CIK 877860 · FY ends Dec 31
$73.36
-0.55 (-0.74%)
USD · as of 2026-08-21 · marketstack

NHI · 10-K · period ended 2020-12-31

← all NHI documents
filed 2021-02-22 · EDGAR original ↗

Our rendering of the filing — original pagination and typography are not reproduced, and tables are reduced to their short label cells (the figures live on FA). Nothing is summarized: every line below is the filing's own text.

blocks 247807 of 1,577348k characters rendered

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There are many significant factors that could materially adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, distributions and stock price. The following are risks we believe are material to our stockholders. There may be additional risks and uncertainties that we have not presently identified or have not deemed material. Some of the following risk factors constitute forward-looking statements. Please refer to “Forward Looking Statements” at the beginning of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Risk Related to COVID-19

Actual or perceived risks associated with public health epidemics or outbreaks, such as the Coronavirus (COVID-19), have had and are expected to continue to have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

The Coronavirus (COVID-19) has had a negative impact and is expected to continue to have a negative impact on the business and results of operations of the operators of our properties and on the Company. Revenues for the operators of our properties are significantly impacted by occupancy. Building occupancy rates have been and will likely continue to be adversely affected by COVID-19. COVID-19 is particularly dangerous for seniors, and the mortality rate increases with age. The occupancy at several of our properties has decreased significantly because of COVID-19 as a result of early resident move-outs, our operators’ delays in accepting new residents due to quarantines or otherwise, and potential occupants’ postponement of moving to a senior housing facility. Such decreased occupancy is likely to continue in 2021. Although at least two potential vaccines for COVID-19 have recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration, the supply and distribution of these vaccines has been strictly limited. Some of our senior housing tenants have received certain supplies of the vaccines, but it will likely be some time before a significant percentage of the population has received a vaccination against COVID-19. A decrease in occupancy or increase in costs is likely to have a material adverse effect on the ability of our operators to meet their financial and other contractual obligations to us, including the payment of rent, as well as on our results of operations. In addition, actions our operators take to address COVID-19 are expected to materially increase their operating costs, including costs related to enhanced health and safety precautions among other measures, which could have a material adverse effect on the ability of our operators to meet their financial and other contractual obligations to us, including the payment of rent. The federal, state and local governments have implemented or announced assistance programs in connection with COVID-19 that have benefited or in the future may benefit certain of our operators, but such government assistance may be insufficient to offset the downturn in business of our operators. In some cases, we may have to write-off unpaid rental payments, incur lease accounting charges due to the uncollectibility of rental payments and/or restructure our operators’ long-term rent obligations and may not be able to do so on terms that are as favorable to us as those currently in place. Furthermore, infections at our facilities could lead to material increases in litigation costs for which our operators, or possibly we, may be liable.

COVID-19 has also caused, and is likely to continue to cause, severe economic, market and other disruptions worldwide. We cannot assure you that conditions in the bank lending, capital and other financial markets will not continue to deteriorate as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, or that our access to capital and other sources of funding will not become constrained, which could adversely affect the availability and terms of future borrowings, renewals or refinancings. Such future constraints could increase our borrowing costs, which would make it more difficult or expensive to obtain additional financing or refinance existing obligations and commitments.

The impact of COVID-19 on our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition could adversely affect our ability to pay dividends at expected levels or at all. All dividends are made at the discretion of our Board of Directors in accordance with Maryland law and depend on our earnings, our financial condition, debt and equity capital available to us, our expectation of our future capital requirements and operating performance, restrictive covenants in our financial and other contractual arrangements, maintenance of our REIT qualification, restrictions under Maryland law and other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant from time to time. Our Board of Directors will continue to assess our dividend rate on an ongoing basis, as COVID-19 and related market conditions and our financial position continue to evolve.

If these developments continue or increase in severity, such developments are likely to have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. The extent to which COVID-19 could impact our business and results of operations will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the duration and scope of the outbreak, the actions taken to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact and the distribution and efficacy of a vaccine, among others.

Risks Related to Our Tenants and Borrowers

We depend on the operating success of our tenants and borrowers for collection of our lease and note payments.

16

Table of Contents

Revenues for the operators of our properties are primarily driven by occupancy, Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement and private pay rates. Revenues from government reimbursement have, and may continue to, come under pressure due to reimbursement cuts resulting from federal and state budget shortfalls and constraints. Periods of weak economic growth in the U.S. which affect housing sales, investment returns and personal incomes may adversely affect senior housing occupancy rates. An oversupply of senior housing real estate may also apply downward pressure to the occupancy rates our operators receive. Expenses for the facilities are driven by the costs of labor, food, utilities, taxes, insurance and rent or debt service. Liability insurance and staffing costs continue to increase for our operators. Historically low unemployment has created significant wage pressure for our operators. To the extent any decrease in revenues and/or any increase in operating expenses results in a property not generating enough cash to make scheduled payments to us, our revenues, net income and funds from operations would be adversely affected. Such events and circumstances would cause us to evaluate whether there was an impairment of the real estate or mortgage loan that should be charged to earnings. Such impairment would be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeded its fair value. Consequently, we might be unable to maintain or increase our current dividend and the market price of our stock may decline.

We are exposed to the risk that our tenants and borrowers may become subject to bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings.

Although our lease agreements provide us the right to evict a tenant/operator and demand immediate payment of rent and exercise other remedies, and our mortgage loans provide us the right to terminate any funding obligations, demand immediate repayment of principal and unpaid interest, foreclose on the collateral and exercise other remedies, the bankruptcy laws afford certain rights to a party that has filed for bankruptcy or reorganization. A tenant or borrower in bankruptcy may be able to limit or delay our ability to collect unpaid rent in the case of a lease or to receive unpaid principal and/or interest in the case of a mortgage loan and to exercise other rights and remedies. For example, a lessee may reject its lease with us in a bankruptcy proceeding. In such a case, our claim against the lessee for unpaid and future rents would be limited by the statutory cap of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This statutory cap could be substantially less than the remaining rent owed under the lease, and any claim we have for unpaid rent might not be paid in full. In addition, a lessee may assert in a bankruptcy proceeding that its lease should be re-characterized as a financing agreement. If such a claim is successful, our rights and remedies as a lender, compared to a landlord, are generally more limited. We may be required to fund certain expenses (e.g. real estate taxes, maintenance and capital improvements) to preserve the value of a property, avoid the imposition of liens on a property and/or transition a property to a new tenant or borrower. In some instances, we have terminated our lease with a tenant and leased the facility to another tenant. In some of those situations, we provided working capital loans to, and limited indemnification of, the new tenant. If we cannot transition a leased facility to a new tenant, we may take possession of that property, which may expose us to certain successor liabilities. Should such events occur, our revenue and operating cash flow may be adversely affected.

Certain tenants in our portfolio account for a significant percentage of the rent we expect to generate from our portfolio, and the failure of any of these tenants to meet their obligations to us could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

The successful performance of our real estate investments is materially dependent on the financial stability of our tenants/operators. For the year ended December 31, 2020, approximately 53% of our total revenue is generated by four tenants, including Bickford (15%), Senior Living (15%), Holiday (12%) and NHC (11%). Payment defaults or a decline in the operating performance by these or other tenants/operators could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay expected dividends to our stockholders. In the event of a tenant default, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-leasing our property. Further, we may not be able to re-lease the property for the rent previously received, or at all, or lease terminations may cause us to sell the property at a loss. The result of any of the foregoing risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial conditions and results of operations and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

We are exposed to risks related to governmental regulations and payors, principally Medicare and Medicaid, and the effect that changes to government regulation or reimbursement rates would have on our tenants’ and borrowers’ business.

Our tenants and borrowers are subject to complex federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to governmental healthcare programs. See “Item 1. Business - Government Regulation.” As a result, our tenants are subject to statutory and regulatory changes, administrative rulings, and policy interpretations. Regulation of the healthcare industry generally has intensified over time both in the number and type of regulations and in the efforts to enforce those regulations. Federal, state and local laws and regulations affecting the healthcare industry include those relating to, among other things, licensure, conduct of operations, addition of facilities and equipment, allowable costs, services, protection and privacy of health information (HIPAA), prices for services, quality of care, patient rights, fraudulent or abusive behavior, and financial and other arrangements that may be entered into by healthcare providers. In addition, changes in enforcement policies by federal and state governments have resulted in an increase in the number of inspections, citations of regulatory deficiencies and other regulatory

17

Table of Contents

sanctions, including terminations from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, bars on Medicare and Medicaid payments for new admissions, civil monetary penalties and even criminal penalties. The status of health care regulations may be subject to change as a result of political, legislative, regulatory, and administrative developments and judicial proceedings. In addition, the replacement of an operator that has defaulted on its lease or loan could be delayed by the approval process of any federal, state or local agency necessary for the transfer of the facility or the replacement of the operator licensed to manage the facility. If the operations, cash flows or financial condition of our operators and tenants are materially adversely impacted by current or future government regulation, our revenue and operations may be adversely affected as well. More generally, and because of the dynamic nature of the legislative and regulatory environment for health care products and services, and in light of existing federal deficit and budgetary concerns, we cannot predict the impact that broad-based, far-reaching legislative or regulatory changes could have on the U.S. economy or on our business or that of our tenants and borrowers.

Our tenants’ and borrowers’ businesses are also affected by government reimbursement and the rates paid by private pay sources. To the extent that any of our facilities receive a significant portion of their revenues from governmental payors, primarily Medicare and Medicaid, such revenues may be subject to statutory and regulatory changes, retroactive rate adjustments, recovery of program overpayments or set-offs, administrative rulings, policy interpretations, payment or other delays by fiscal intermediaries, government funding restrictions (at a program level or with respect to specific facilities) and interruption or delays in payments due to any ongoing governmental investigations and audits at such facilities. In recent years, governmental payors have frozen or reduced payments to health care providers due to budgetary pressures. Such reductions in Medicare reimbursement will have an adverse effect on the financial operations of our borrowers and lessees who operate SNFs. Changes in health care reimbursement will likely continue to be of paramount importance to federal and state programs. The President and members of the U.S. Congress may approve or propose various spending cuts and tax reform initiatives that could result in changes (including substantial reductions in funding) to Medicare, Medicaid or Medicare Advantage Plans. In addition, a number of states are currently managing budget deficits, which may put pressure on states to decrease reimbursement rates for our tenants and operators with a goal of decreasing state expenditures under their state Medicaid programs. We cannot make any assessment as to the ultimate timing or effect any future legislative reforms may have on the financial condition of the health care industry. There can be no assurance that adequate reimbursement levels will continue to be available for services provided by any facility operator, whether the facility receives reimbursement from Medicare, Medicaid or private pay sources. Significant limits on the scope of services reimbursed and on reimbursement rates and fees could have a material adverse effect on an operator’s liquidity, financial condition and results of operations, which could adversely affect the ability of an operator to meet its obligations to us.

We are exposed to the risk that the cash flows of our tenants and borrowers would be adversely affected by increased liability claims and liability insurance costs.

ALF and SNF operators have experienced substantial increases in both the number and size of patient care liability claims in recent years, particularly in the states of Texas and Florida. As a result, general and professional liability costs have increased and may continue to increase. Nationwide, long-term care liability insurance rates are increasing because of large jury awards in states like Texas and Florida. Both Texas and Florida have now adopted SNF liability laws that modify or limit tort damages. Despite some of these reforms, the long-term care industry overall continues to experience very high general and professional liability costs. Insurance companies have responded to this claims crisis by severely restricting their capacity to write long-term care general and professional liability policies. No assurance can be given that the climate for long-term care general and professional liability insurance will improve in any of the foregoing states or any other states where the facility operators conduct business. Insurance companies may continue to reduce or stop writing general and professional liability policies for ALFs and SNFs. Thus, general and professional liability insurance coverage may be restricted, very costly or not available, which may adversely affect the facility operators’ future operations, cash flows and financial condition and may have a material adverse effect on the facility operators’ ability to meet their obligations to us.

We are exposed to the risk that we may not be fully indemnified by our lessees and borrowers against future litigation.

Our leases and notes require that the tenant/borrowers name us as an additional insured party on their insurance policies covering professional liability or personal injury claims. These instruments also require the tenant/borrower to indemnify and hold us harmless for all claims arising out of or incidental to the occupancy and use of each facility. We cannot give any assurance that these protective measures will completely eliminate any risk to us related to future litigation, the costs of which could have a material adverse impact on us.

We are subject to risks of damage from catastrophic weather and other natural or man-made disasters and the physical effects of climate change.

18

Table of Contents

Natural and man-made disasters, including terrorist attacks and acts of nature such as hurricanes, tornados, earthquakes, flooding and wildfires, may cause damage to our properties or business disruption to our tenants and borrowers. These adverse weather and natural or manmade events could cause substantial damage or loss to our properties which could exceed applicable property insurance coverage. Such events could also have a material adverse impact on our tenant’s operations and ability to meet its obligations to us. In the event of a loss in excess of insured limits, we could lose our capital invested in the affected property, as well as anticipated future revenue from that property. Any such loss could materially and adversely affect our business and our financial condition and results of operations.

Climate change may also have indirect effects on our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) property insurance on terms we find acceptable. To the extent that significant changes in the climate occur in areas where our properties are located, we may experience more frequent extreme weather events which may result in physical damage to or a decrease in demand for properties located in these areas or affected by these conditions. In addition, changes in federal and state legislation and regulation on climate change could result in increased capital expenditures to improve the energy efficiency of our existing properties and could also require us to spend more on our new development properties without a corresponding increase in revenue. Should the impact of climate change be material in nature, including destruction of our properties, or occur for lengthy periods of time, our financial condition or results of operations may be adversely affected.

Risks Related to Our Business and Operations

We depend on the success of property development and construction activities, which may fail to achieve the operating results we expect.

When we decide to invest in the renovation of an existing property or in the development of a new property, we make assumptions about the future potential cash flows of that property. We estimate our return based on expected occupancy, rental rates and future capital costs. If our projections prove to be inaccurate due to increased capital costs, lower occupancy or other factors, our investment in that property may not generate the cash flow we expected. Recently developed properties may take longer than expected to achieve stabilized operating levels, if at all. To the extent such facilities fail to reach stabilized operating levels or achieve stabilization later than expected, it could materially adversely affect our tenants’ abilities to make payments to us under their leases and thus adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We are exposed to the risk that the illiquidity of real estate investments could impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our properties.

Real estate investments are relatively illiquid and, therefore, our ability to quickly sell or exchange any of our properties in response to changes in economic and other conditions may be limited. All of our properties are "special purpose" properties that cannot be readily converted to general residential, retail or office use. Facilities that participate in Medicare or Medicaid must meet extensive program requirements, including physical plant and operational requirements. Transfers of operations of facilities are subject to regulatory approvals not required for transfers of other types of real estate. Thus, if the operation of any of our properties becomes unprofitable due to competition, age of improvements or other factors such that our lessee or borrower becomes unable to meet its obligations on the lease or mortgage loan, the liquidation value of the property may be less than the net book value or the amount owed on any related mortgage loan, because the property may not be readily adaptable to other uses. The sale of the property or the replacement of an operator that has defaulted on its lease or loan could also be delayed by the approval process of any federal, state or local agency necessary for the transfer of the property or the replacement of the operator with a new operator licensed to manage the facility. No assurances can be given that we will recognize full value for any property that we are required to sell for liquidity reasons. Should such events occur, our results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.

We are exposed to risks associated with our investments in unconsolidated entities, including our lack of sole decision-making authority and our reliance on the financial condition of other interests.

Our investments in unconsolidated entities could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority regarding major decisions, our reliance on the financial condition of other interests, any disputes that may arise between us and other partners, and our exposure to potential losses from the actions of partners. Risks of dealing with parties outside NHI include limitations on unilateral major decisions opposed by other interests, the prospect of divergent goals of ownership including disputes regarding management, ownership or disposition of a property, or limitations on the transfer of our interests without the consent of our partners. Risks of the unconsolidated entity extend to areas in which the financial health of our partners may impact our plans. Our partners might become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions, which may hinder significant action in the entity. We may disagree with our partners about decisions affecting a property or the entity itself, which could result in litigation or arbitration that increases our expenses, distracts our officers and directors and

19

Table of Contents

disrupts the day-to-day operations of the property, including by delaying important decisions until the dispute is resolved; and finally, we may suffer losses as a result of actions taken by our partners with respect to our investments.

We are subject to additional risks related to healthcare operations associated with our investments in unconsolidated entities, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Since January 31, 2020, we have an investment in an unconsolidated entity that is structured to be in compliance with RIDEA. As such, we are exposed to various operational risks with respect to those operating properties that may increase our costs or adversely affect our ability to increase revenues. These risks include fluctuations in resident occupancy, operating expenses, economic conditions; competition; certification and inspection laws, regulations, and standards; the availability of and increases in cost of general and professional liability insurance coverage; litigation; federal, state and local taxes and regulations; costs associated with government investigations and enforcement actions; the availability and increases in cost of labor; and other risks applicable to any operating business. Any one or a combination of these factors may adversely affect our revenue and operations.

We are subject to risks associated with our joint venture investment with Life Care Services for Timber Ridge, an Entrance Fee CCRC, associated with Type A benefits offered to the residents of the joint venture's Entrance Fee community and related accounting requirements.

Effective January 31, 2020, we entered into a joint venture with Life Care Services (“LCS”) which consists of two parts, Timber Ridge PropCo which owns the real estate and is owned 80% NHI and 20% LCS and Timber Ridge OpCo which operates the property and is owned 25% NHI and 75% LCS. Rents received from the Timber Ridge OpCo in the RIDEA structure are treated as qualifying rents from real property for REIT tax purposes only if (i) they are paid pursuant to a lease of a “qualified healthcare property” and (ii) the operator qualifies as an “eligible independent contractor,” as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”). If either of these requirements are not satisfied, then the rents will not be qualifying rents.

As part of acquisition of the real estate, Timber Ridge PropCo accepted the property subject to trust liens previously granted to residents of Timber Ridge. Beginning in 2008, early residents of Timber Ridge executed loans to the then owner/operators backed by liens and entered into a Deed of Trust and Indenture of Trust (the “Deed and Indenture”) for the benefit of the trustee on behalf of all residents who made mortgage loans to the owner/operator in accordance with a resident agreement. The Deed and Indenture granted a security interest in the Timber Ridge property to secure the loans made by the early residents of the property. Subsequent to these early transactions, the practice was discontinued at Timber Ridge. Therefore, the remaining outstanding “old” loans made by the residents are still secured by a security interest in the Timber Ridge property. The trustee for all of the residents who made “old” loans in accordance with the resident agreements entered into a subordination agreement concurrent with Timber Ridge PropCo’s acquisition, pursuant to which the trustee acknowledged and confirmed that the security interests created under the Deed and Indenture were subordinate to any security interests granted in connection with the loan made by NHI to Timber Ridge PropCo. With the periodic settlement of some of the outstanding resident loans in the course of normal entrance-fee community operations by Timber Ridge OpCo, the balance owing on the Deed and Indenture at December 31, 2020 was $17,155,300. By terms of the resident loan assumption agreement, during the term of the lease (7 years with two renewal options), Timber Ridge OpCo is to indemnify Timber Ridge PropCo for any repayment by Timber Ridge PropCo of these liabilities under the guarantee. We cannot give any assurance that these protective measures will completely eliminate any risk to us related to claims under the Deed and Indenture.

As a result of the RIDEA structure, we have an investment in the operations of Timber Ridge. Timber Ridge is a Class A quality, Type A care CCRC. A Type A Entrance Fee community generally means the care of the resident is provided for upon payment of an entrance fee and thereafter payment of a monthly set service fee. The entrance fee is divided into a refundable and non-refundable portion depending upon the resident’s chosen contract program. The service fee is determined at the time of move-in into an IL unit and is subject to certain inflation-based adjustments regardless of the resident’s future care needs. A resident must move into an IL unit initially and not require care at the time of move-in. However, thereafter the resident’s care requirements from assisted living to memory care to skilled nursing are provided for. The refundable portion of the upfront entrance fee is recorded as a liability on the financial statements of the Timber Ridge OpCo. The non-refundable portion of the upfront entrance fee is recorded as deferred revenue and amortized over the actuarial life of the resident. We believe the structure of the joint venture does not require that the Timber Ridge OpCo’s financial statements be consolidated into NHI, but if we are unable to properly maintain that structure or become required for any reason to consolidate the Timber Ridge OpCo’s financial statements into ours, the results would have a material adverse impact on our financial results.

If our efforts to maintain the privacy and security of Company information are not successful, we could incur substantial costs and reputational damage, and could become subject to litigation and enforcement actions.

20

Table of Contents

Our business, like that of other REITs, involves the receipt, storage and transmission of information about our Company, our tenants and borrowers, and our employees, some of which is entrusted to third-party service providers and vendors. We also work with third-party service providers and vendors to provide technology, systems and services that we use in connection with the receipt, storage and transmission of this information.

Our information systems, and those of our third-party service providers and vendors, may be vulnerable to continually evolving cybersecurity risks. Unauthorized parties may attempt to gain access to these systems or our information through fraud or deception of our associates, third-party service providers or vendors. Hardware, software or applications we obtain from third parties may contain defects in design or manufacture or other problems that could unexpectedly compromise information security. The methods used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service or sabotage systems are also constantly changing and evolving and may be difficult to anticipate or detect for long periods of time. We have implemented and regularly review and update processes and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to or use of secured data and to prevent data loss. However, the ever-evolving threats mean we and our third-party service providers and vendors must continually evaluate and adapt our respective systems and processes, and there is no guarantee that they will be adequate to safeguard against all data security breaches or misuses of data. Any significant compromise or breach of our data security, whether external or internal, or misuse of our data, could result in significant costs, fines, lawsuits, and damage to our reputation. In addition, as the regulatory environment related to information security, data collection and use, and privacy becomes increasingly rigorous, with new and constantly changing requirements applicable to our business, compliance with those requirements could also result in significant additional costs.

We are exposed to risks related to environmental laws and the costs associated with liabilities related to hazardous substances.

Under various federal and state laws, owners or operators of real property may be required to respond to the release of hazardous substances on the property and may be held liable for property damage, personal injuries or penalties that result from environmental contamination. These laws also expose us to the possibility that we may become liable to reimburse the government for damages and costs it incurs in connection with the contamination. Generally, such liability attaches to a person based on the person’s relationship to the property. Our tenants or borrowers are primarily responsible for the condition of the property they occupy. Moreover, we review environmental site assessment of the properties that we purchase or encumber prior to taking an interest in them. Those assessments are designed to meet the “all appropriate inquiry” standard, which qualifies us for the innocent purchaser defense if environmental liabilities arise. Based upon such assessments, we do not believe that any of our properties are subject to material environmental contamination. However, environmental liabilities, including mold, may be present in our properties and we may incur costs to remediate contamination, which could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.

We depend on the success of our future acquisitions and investments.

We are exposed to the risk that our future acquisitions may not prove to be successful. We could encounter unanticipated difficulties and expenditures relating to any acquired properties, including contingent liabilities, and newly acquired properties might require significant attention of NHI’s management that would otherwise be devoted to our existing business. If we agree to provide construction funding to a borrower and the project is not completed, we may need to take steps to ensure completion of the project. Moreover, if we issue equity securities or incur additional debt, or both, to finance future acquisitions, it may reduce our per share financial results.

We depend on our ability to reinvest cash in real estate investments in a timely manner and on acceptable terms.

From time to time, we will have cash available from principal payments on our notes receivable and the sale of properties, including tenant purchase option exercises, under the terms of master leases or similar financial support arrangements. We must reinvest these proceeds, on a timely basis, in health care investments or in qualified short-term investments. We compete for real estate investments with a broad variety of potential investors. This competition for attractive investments may negatively affect our ability to make timely investments on terms acceptable to us. Delays in acquiring properties may negatively impact revenues and the amount of distributions to stockholders.

Competition for acquisitions may result in increased prices for properties.

We may face increased competition for acquisition opportunities from other well-capitalized investors, including publicly traded and privately held REITs, private real estate funds, partnerships and others. This may mean that we are unsuccessful in a

21

Table of Contents

potential acquisition of a desired property at acceptable prices or, even if we are able to acquire a desired property, competition from other real estate investors may significantly increase the purchase price.

We are exposed to the risk that our assets may be subject to impairment charges.

As a REIT, a significant percentage of our assets is invested in real estate. We regularly evaluate our real estate investments and other assets for impairment indicators. The judgment regarding the existence of impairment indicators is based on factors such as market conditions, operator performance and legal structure. If we determine that a significant impairment has occurred, we would be required to make an adjustment to the net carrying value of the asset, which could have a material adverse effect on our reported results of operations in the period in which the impairment charge occurs.Such impairment charges may make it more difficult for us to meet the financial ratios in our indebtedness and may reduce the borrowing base, which may reduce the amounts of cash we would otherwise have available to pay expenses, make dividend distributions, service other indebtedness and operate our business.

Risks Related to Our Debt

We may need to refinance existing debt or incur additional debt in the future, which may not be available on terms acceptable to us.

We operate with a policy of incurring debt when, in the opinion of our Board of Directors, it is advisable. Currently, we believe that our current liquidity, availability under our unsecured credit facility, and our capacity to service additional debt will enable us to meet our obligations, including dividends, and continue to make investments in healthcare real estate. While we currently have a low debt ratio, in the future, we may increase our borrowings. In January 2021, we issued $400 million in public bonds. The proceeds of this offering were used primarily to pay down our unsecured credit facility and other debt obligations. As a result, as of January 31, 2021 we have approximately $1,535,325,000 in outstanding indebtedness and approximately $520,000,000 available to draw under our unsecured credit facility. We may incur additional debt by borrowing under our unsecured credit facility, mortgaging properties we own and/or issuing debt securities in a public offering or in a private transaction. We believe we will be able to raise additional debt and equity capital at reasonable costs to refinance our existing indebtedness at or prior to its maturity. Our ability to raise reasonably priced capital is not guaranteed. We may be unable to raise reasonably priced capital because of reasons related to our business or for reasons beyond our control, such as market conditions. If our access to capital becomes limited, it could have an impact on our ability to refinance our debt obligations, fund dividend payments, acquire properties and fund acquisition activities.

We have covenants related to our indebtedness which impose certain operational limitations and a breach of those covenants could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

The terms of our current indebtedness as well as debt instruments that the Company may enter into in the future are subject to customary financial and operational covenants. Among other things, these provisions require us to maintain certain financial ratios and minimum net worth and impose certain limits on our ability to incur indebtedness, create liens and make investments or acquisitions. Our continued ability to incur debt and operate our business is subject to compliance with these covenants, which limit operational flexibility. Breaches of these covenants could result in a default under applicable debt instruments, even if payment obligations are satisfied. Financial and other covenants that limit our operational flexibility, as well as defaults resulting from a breach of any of these covenants in our debt instruments, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Downgrades in our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our cost and availability of capital.

We plan to manage the Company to maintain a capital structure consistent with our current profile, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our current credit ratings. Moody's Investors Services (“Moody's”) announced on November 5, 2020 that it assigned an investment grade issuer credit rating and a senior unsecured debt rating of Baa3 with a “Negative” outlook to the Company. Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”) reaffirmed its BBB- and “Stable” outlook on the Company on September 30, 2020 and S&P Global Ratings (“S&P Global”) also reaffirmed its BBB- and “Stable” outlook on the Company at November 4, 2020. Any downgrades of ratings or changes to outlooks by any or all of the rating agencies could have a material adverse effect on our cost and availability of capital, which could in turn have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity, cash flows, the trading/redemption price of our securities and our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and to pay dividends and distributions to our equity holders.

We depend on revenues derived mainly from fixed rate investments in real estate assets, while a portion of our debt used to finance those investments bears interest at variable rates.

22

Table of Contents

Our business model assumes that we can earn a spread between the returns earned from our investments in real estate as compared to our cost of debt and/or equity capital. Current interest rates on our debt are at low levels, and, as a result, the spread and our profitability on our investments have been at high levels. We are exposed to interest rate risk in the potential for a narrowing of our spread and profitability if interest rates increase in the future. Certain of our debt obligations are floating rate obligations with interest rates that vary with the movement of the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or other indexes. Our revenues are derived mainly from fixed rate investments in real estate assets. Although our leases generally contain escalating rent clauses that provide a partial hedge against interest rate fluctuations, if interest rates rise, our interest costs for our existing floating rate debt and any new debt we incur would also increase. This increasing cost of debt could reduce our profitability by increasing the cost of financing our existing portfolio and our investment activity. Rising interest rates could limit our ability to refinance existing debt upon maturity or cause us to pay higher rates upon refinancing. We manage a portion of our exposure to interest rate risk by accessing debt with staggered maturities and through the use of derivative instruments, such as interest rate swap agreements with major financial institutions. Increased interest rates may also negatively affect the market price of our common stock and increase the cost of new equity capital.

We are subject to risks related to changes in the method of determining LIBOR, or the replacement of LIBOR with an alternative reference rate, which may adversely affect interest rates on our current or future indebtedness and may otherwise adversely affect our financial condition and result of operations.

In 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority announced that after 2021 it would no longer compel banks to submit the rates required to calculate the LIBOR. This announcement indicates that the continuation of LIBOR on the current basis cannot and will not be guaranteed after 2021. We have a significant number of debt instruments with attributes that are dependent on LIBOR. The transition from LIBOR to an alternative reference rate could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

Risk Related to Our Status as a Real Estate Investment Trust

We depend on the ability to continue to qualify for taxation as a Real Estate Investment Trust.

We intend to operate as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and believe we have and will continue to operate in such a manner. Since REIT qualification requires us to meet a number of complex requirements, it is possible that we may fail to fulfill them. If we fail to qualify as a REIT:

•we will not be allowed a deduction for distributions to stockholders in computing our taxable income;

•we will be subject to corporate-level income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on our taxable income at regular corporate rates;

•we could be subject to increased state and local income taxes; and

•unless we are entitled to relief under relevant statutory provisions, we will be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which we fail to qualify as a REIT.

Because of all these factors, our failure to qualify as a REIT could also impair our ability to expand our business and could materially adversely affect the value of our common stock. The present federal income tax treatment of REITs may be modified, possibly with retroactive effect, by legislative, judicial or administrative action at any time, which could affect the federal income tax treatment of an investment in us. The federal income tax rules dealing with REITs constantly are under review by persons involved in the legislative process, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) and the U.S. Treasury Department, which results in statutory changes as well as frequent revisions to regulations and interpretations. Revisions in federal tax laws and interpretations thereof could affect or cause us to change our investments and commitments and affect the tax considerations of an investment in us.

Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive acquisition opportunities or liquidate otherwise attractive investments, which could materially hinder our performance.

To qualify as a REIT for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy certain tests, including tests concerning the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of our stock. To meet these tests, we may be required to forego investments or acquisitions we might otherwise make. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may materially hinder our performance.

Legislative, regulatory, or administrative changes could adversely affect us or our security holders.

23

Table of Contents

The tax laws or regulations governing REITs or the administrative interpretations thereof may be amended at any time. We cannot predict if or when any new or amended law, regulation, or administrative interpretation will be adopted, promulgated, or become effective, and any such change may apply retroactively. The last significant legislation affecting REITs came with the passage of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, effective for tax years beginning in 2018. We and our security holders may be adversely affected by any new or amended law, regulation, or administrative interpretation.

Prospective investors are urged to consult with their tax advisors with respect to the status of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and any other regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on investment in our securities.

Risk Related to Our Organizational Structure

We have ownership limits in our charter with respect to our common stock and other classes of capital stock which may delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.

Our charter, subject to certain exceptions, contains restrictions on the ownership and transfer of our common and preferred stock that are intended to assist us in preserving our qualification as a REIT. Our charter provides that any transfer that would cause NHI to be beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons or would cause NHI to be “closely held” under the Internal Revenue Code would be void, which, subject to certain exceptions, results in no person or entity being allowed to own, actually or constructively, more than 9.9% of the outstanding shares of our stock. Our Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, may exempt a proposed transferee from the ownership limit and such an exemption has been granted through Excepted Holder Agreements to members of the Carl E. Adams family. Based on the Excepted Holder Agreements currently outstanding, the individual ownership limit for all other stockholders is approximately 7.5%. Our charter gives our Board of Directors broad powers to prohibit and rescind any attempted transfer in violation of the ownership limits. These ownership limits may delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.

We are subject to certain provisions of Maryland law and our charter and bylaws that could hinder, delay or prevent a change in control transaction, even if the transaction involves a premium price for our common stock or our stockholders believe such transaction to be otherwise in their best interests.

The Maryland Business Combination Act provides that, unless exempted, a Maryland corporation may not engage in business combinations, including mergers, dispositions of 10% or more of its assets, issuances of shares of stock and other specified transactions with an “interested stockholder” or an affiliate of an interested stockholder for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder, and thereafter, unless specified criteria are met. An interested stockholder is generally a person owning or controlling, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the voting power of the outstanding stock of a Maryland corporation. Unless our Board of Directors takes action to exempt us, generally or with respect to certain transactions, from this statute in the future, the Maryland Business Combination Act will be applicable to business combinations between us and other persons. The Company’s charter and bylaws also contain certain provisions that could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or discouraging a third party from attempting to acquire, control of the Company. Such provisions could limit the price that certain investors might be willing to pay in the future for the common stock. These provisions include a staggered board of directors, blank check preferred stock, and the application of Maryland corporate law provisions on business combinations and control shares. The foregoing matters may, together or separately, have the effect of discouraging or making more difficult an acquisition or change of control of the Company.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.

24

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES OWNED OR ASSOCIATED WITH MORTGAGE LOAN INVESTMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2020

PROPERTIES OWNED ($ in thousands)

Location SHO SNF HOSP & MOB Investment Rental Income

Corporate office 2,689 —

Escrow funds received from tenants for property operating expenses — 9,653

25

Table of Contents

PROPERTIES ASSOCIATED WITH MORTGAGE LOAN INVESTMENTS ($ in thousands)

Mortgage

Location SHO SNF Investment Interest

New Hampshire1 — — — 747

Other non-mortgage income 4,175

1 Current year pay off.

10-YEAR LEASE EXPIRATIONS

The following table provides additional information on our leases which are scheduled to expire based on the maturity date contained in the most recent lease agreement or extension. We expect that, prior to maturity, we will negotiate new terms of a lease to either the current tenant or another qualified operator.

Annualized Percentage of

Number Rentable Number Gross Rent** Annualized

Year of Properties Square Feet* of Units/Beds (in thousands) Gross Rent

*Rentable Square Feet represents total square footage in two MOB investments.

**Annualized Gross Rent refers to the amount of lease revenue that our portfolio would have generated in 2020 if all leases were in effect for the twelve-month calendar year, regardless of the commencement date, maturity date, or renewals.

The above table does not reflect purchase options. See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for discussion of purchase options.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Our facilities are subject to claims and suits in the ordinary course of business. Our lessees and borrowers have indemnified, and are obligated to continue to indemnify us, against all liabilities arising from the operation of the facilities, and are further obligated to indemnify us against environmental or title problems affecting the real estate underlying such facilities. While there may be lawsuits pending against certain of the owners and/or lessees of the facilities, management believes that the ultimate resolution of all such pending proceedings will have no material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2018, East Lake Capital Management LLC and certain related entities, including SH-Regency Leasing, LLC (“Regency”) (for three assisted living facilities in Tennessee, Indiana and North Carolina), filed suit against NHI in Texas seeking injunctive and declaratory relief and unspecified monetary damages. NHI responded with counterclaims and filed motions requesting the immediate appointment of a receiver and for pre-judgment possession. Resulting from these claims and

26

Table of Contents

counterclaims, on December 6, 2018, the parties entered into an agreement resulting in Regency vacating the facilities in December 2018. Litigation is ongoing.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable

27

Table of Contents

PART II.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

The Company’s charter contains certain provisions which are designed to ensure that the Company’s status as a REIT is protected for federal income tax purposes. One of the provisions ensures that any transfer (of shares) which would cause NHI to be beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons or would cause NHI to be “closely-held” under the Internal Revenue Code would be void which, subject to certain exceptions, result in no stockholder being allowed to own, either directly or indirectly pursuant to certain tax attribution rules, more than 9.9% of the Company’s common stock with the exception of prior agreements in 1991 which were confirmed in writing in 2008 with the Company’s founders Dr. Carl E. Adams and Jennie Mae Adams and their lineal descendants. Based on these agreements, the ownership limit for all other stockholders is approximately 7.5%. If a stockholder’s stock ownership exceeds the limit, then such shares over the limit become Excess Stock within the meaning in the Company’s charter and lose rights to vote and receive dividends in certain situations. Our charter gives our Board of Directors broad powers to prohibit and rescind any attempted transfer in violation of the ownership limits. In addition, W. Andrew Adams’ Excess Holder Agreement also provides that he will not own shares of stock in any tenant of the Company if such ownership would cause the Company to constructively own more than a 9.9% interest in such tenant. The purpose of these provisions is to protect the Company’s status as a REIT for tax purposes.

In order to qualify for the beneficial tax treatment accorded to a REIT, we must make distributions to holders of our common stock equal on an annual basis to at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (excluding net capital gains), as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. Cash available for distribution to our stockholders is primarily derived from rental payments received under our leases and from interest payments received on our notes. All distributions will be made by us at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on our cash flow and earnings, our financial condition, covenants contained in our financing documents and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant. Our REIT taxable income is calculated without reference to our cash flow. Therefore, under certain circumstances, our required distributions may exceed the cash available for distribution.

Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “NHI”. As of February 15, 2021, there were approximately 746 holders of record of shares and 70,448 beneficial owners of shares.

The Company’s outstanding stock incentive awards have been granted under two incentive compensation plans - the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”) and the 2019 Stock Incentive Plan (“the 2019 Plan”). These plans, as amended, have been approved by our stockholders. The following table provides information as of December 31, 2020 about our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options under our existing equity compensation plans.

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders — $— —

The following graph demonstrates the performance of the cumulative total return to the stockholders of our common stock during the previous five years in comparison to the cumulative total return on the MSCI US REIT Index and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index. The MSCI US REIT Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization weighted index that is comprised of Equity REIT securities. The MSCI US REIT Index includes securities with exposure to core real estate (e.g. residential and retail properties) as well as securities with exposure to other types of real estate (e.g. casinos, theaters).

28

Table of Contents

29

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

The following table represents our financial information for the five years ended December 31, 2020. This financial information has been derived from our historical financial statements including those for the most recent three years included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and should be read in conjunction with those consolidated financial statements, accompanying footnotes and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7.

($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

Years Ended December 31,

Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests (185) 7 — — (1,176)

PER SHARE DATA:

Basic earnings per common share:

Diluted earnings per common share:

OTHER DATA:

Weighted average common shares:

Regular dividends declared per common share $ 4.41 $ 4.20 $ 4.00 $ 3.80 $ 3.60

BALANCE SHEET DATA: (at year end)

Investments in preferred stock and marketable securities — — — — 11,745

Assets held for sale, net — 18,420 — — —

30

Table of Contents

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion and analysis is based primarily on the consolidated financial statements of National Health Investors, Inc. for the periods presented and should be read together with the notes thereto contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other important factors are identified in “Item 1. Business” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors” above. This section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K generally discusses 2020 and 2019 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2020 and 2019. Discussions of 2018 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2019 and 2018 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Executive Overview

National Health Investors, Inc., established in 1991 as a Maryland corporation, is a self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) specializing in sale-leaseback, joint-venture, mortgage and mezzanine financing of need-driven and discretionary senior housing and medical facility investments. Our portfolio consists of real estate investments in independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, entrance-fee communities, senior living campuses, skilled nursing facilities, hospitals and medical office buildings. We fund our real estate investments primarily through: (1) operating cash flow, (2) debt offerings, including bank lines of credit and term debt, both unsecured and secured, and (3) the sale of equity securities.

Portfolio

At December 31, 2020, we had investments in real estate and mortgage and other notes receivable involving 242 facilities located in 34 states. These investments involve 162 senior housing properties, 75 skilled nursing facilities, 3 hospitals, 2 medical office buildings and other notes receivable. These investments (excluding our corporate office of $2,689,000) consisted of properties with an original cost of approximately $3,262,381,000 rented under primarily triple-net leases to 34 lessees, and $297,373,000 aggregate carrying value of mortgage and other notes receivable, excluding an allowance for expected credit losses of $4,946,000, due from 9 borrowers.

We classify all of the properties in our portfolio as either senior housing or medical properties. Because our leases represent different underlying revenue sources and result in differing risk profiles, we further classify our senior housing communities as either need-driven (assisted living and memory care communities and senior living campuses) or discretionary (independent living and entrance-fee communities.)

Senior Housing – Need-Driven includes assisted living and memory care facilities (“ALF”) and senior living campuses (“SLC”) which primarily attract private payment for services from residents who require assistance with activities of daily living. Need-driven properties are subject to regulatory oversight.

Senior Housing – Discretionary includes independent living facilities (“ILF”) and entrance-fee communities (“EFC”) which primarily attract private payment for services from residents who are making the lifestyle choice of living in an age-restricted multi-family community that offers social programs, meals, housekeeping and in some cases access to healthcare services. Discretionary properties are subject to limited regulatory oversight. There is a correlation between demand for this type of community and the strength of the housing market.

Medical Facilities within our portfolio receive payment primarily from Medicare, Medicaid and health insurance. These properties include skilled nursing facilities (“SNF”), medical office buildings (“MOB”) and hospitals that attract patients who have a need for acute or complex medical attention, preventative medicine, or rehabilitation services. Medical properties are subject to state and federal regulatory oversight and, in the case of hospitals, Joint Commission accreditation.

31

Table of Contents

The following tables summarize our investments in real estate and mortgage and other notes receivable as of December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

Real Estate Properties Properties Beds/Sq. Ft.* Revenue % Investment

Senior Housing - Need-Driven

Senior Housing - Discretionary

Medical Facilities

Current Year Disposals and Held for Sale 272

Escrow Funds Received From Tenants

for Property Operating Expenses 9,653

Mortgage and Other Notes Receivable

Current Year Note Payoffs 2,947

Other Income 582

Portfolio Summary Properties Revenue % Investment

Portfolio by Operator Type

For the year ended December 31, 2020, operators of facilities who provided 3% or more and collectively 79% of our total revenues were (parent company, in alphabetical order): Bickford Senior Living; Chancellor Health Care; Discovery Senior Living; Health Services Management; Holiday Retirement; Life Care Services; National HealthCare Corporation; Senior Living Communities; Senior Living Management; and The Ensign Group.

As of December 31, 2020, our average effective annualized rental income was $8,724 per bed for SNFs, $11,704 per unit for SLCs, $14,355 per unit for ALFs, $12,701 per unit for ILFs, $22,747 per unit for EFCs, $39,330 per bed for hospitals, and $8 per square foot for MOBs.

32

Table of Contents

COVID-19 Pandemic

The World Health Organization declared coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) a pandemic on March 11, 2020. The continually evolving pandemic has resulted in a widespread health crisis adversely affecting governments, businesses, and financial markets. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many state, local and federal agencies instituted various health and safety measures including temporary closures of many businesses, “shelter in place” orders, and social distancing guidelines that remain in place to some degree. The COVID-19 pandemic and related health and safety measures have created a significant strain on the operations of many of the Company’s tenants, operators and borrowers.

The federal government passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act into law in March 2020 that provides economic assistance and other forms of relief from the financial hardships caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Funds have been distributed by various government agencies including the US Department of Treasury and the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) which oversees the distributions to healthcare providers who participate in various government reimbursement programs (e.g., Medicare). This federal government assistance has mitigated to some extent the negative financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic for certain of our tenants and operators who are eligible.

Revenues for the operators of our properties are significantly impacted by occupancy. Building occupancy rates have been and may continue to be adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic if it continues to cause sustained negative trends such as early resident move-outs, delays in admitting new residents, or other collateral events such as a weakening in the housing market, a typical funding source for our senior housing operators’ customers. In addition, actions our operators take to address outbreaks could materially increase their operating costs, including costs related to enhanced health and safety precautions among other measures. A decrease in occupancy or increase in costs could have a material adverse effect on the ability of our operators to meet their financial and other contractual obligations to us, including the payment of rent, as well as on our results of operations.

For the year ended December 31, 2020, contractual cash collected and deferred or abated was as follows:

1Contractual cash collected for January 2021 is approximately 95.1%.

We agreed to defer rent due from Bickford Senior Living totaling $5,850,000 for 2020 and $750,000 for January 2021 as a result of the impact from the COVID-19 pandemic. Of the 2020 deferral, $2,100,000 related to the third quarter with half of the deferral placed in escrow. We continue our negotiations with Bickford for the sale of nine properties which are currently leased to Bickford and have a gross book value of approximately $76,658,000 as of December 31, 2020. The $2,100,000 of deferred rent will be forgiven contingent upon Bickford’s ability to close on the acquisition of these properties. Rental income from this portfolio was $7,878,000 (net of $182,000 of the deferral mentioned above) for the year ended December 31, 2020 and $9,383,000 and $8,859,000 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, including straight-line rental income of $283,000, $680,000 and $331,000, respectively.

The deferred rent for Bickford of $3,750,000 pertaining to the fourth quarter and the $750,000 pertaining to January 2021 bears interest at 8% per annum with repayments, including accrued interest, over twelve months beginning in June 2021.

We agreed to rent concessions with another tenant totaling $1,072,000 in deferrals for 2020, $50,000 in abatements for 2020, and $447,000 in deferrals related to the first quarter of 2021. Of the 2020 totals, approximately $534,000 in deferrals and $20,000 in abatements are related to the third quarter and $538,000 in deferrals and $30,000 in abatements relate to the fourth quarter. The deferred amounts accrue interest from the date of the deferral until paid in full with payments due starting in July 2021 and due no later than December 2022. The initial interest is 8% on the deferrals through December 31, 2021, after which time the rate increases to 9%.

33

Table of Contents

In the fourth quarter of 2020, we also modified a transition property’s lease in response to the COVID-19 pandemic that extended the lease term by one year and deferred rent of $160,000. See “Other Portfolio Activity” Transitioning Tenants for information regarding our transition properties.

When applicable, we have elected not to apply the modification guidance under ASC 842 and have decided to account for the related concessions as variable lease payments, recorded as rental income when received. We will evaluate any rent deferral requests as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic on a tenant-by-tenant basis. The extent of future concessions we make as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which could have a material impact on our future operating results, cannot be reasonably or reliably projected by us at this time.

We believe our liquidity positions us to manage through the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. As of January 31, 2021, we had approximately $37,205,000 in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents on hand and $520,000,000 in availability under our unsecured revolving credit facility. In addition, we have access to additional debt sources and maintain availability under our at-the-market (“ATM”) equity issuance program and shelf registration statement to fund our future obligations, although no assurances can be made. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for further discussion.

See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding the risks presented by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Critical Accounting Policies

Estimates

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These accounting principles require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. If actual experience differs from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements, the resulting changes could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, liquidity and/or financial condition.

We consider an accounting estimate or assumption critical if:

1.the nature of the estimates or assumptions is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change; and

2.the impact of the estimates and assumptions on financial condition or operating performance is material.

Valuations and Impairments

We evaluate the recoverability of the carrying values of our properties on a property-by-property basis. We review our properties for recoverability when events or circumstances, including significant physical changes in the property, significant adverse changes in general economic conditions and significant deterioration of the underlying cash flows of the property, indicate that the carrying amount of the property may not be recoverable. The need to recognize an impairment charge is based on estimated undiscounted future cash flows from a property compared to the carrying value of that property. If recognition of an impairment charge is necessary, it is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the property exceeds the fair value of the property.

Lease accounting standards require that, for purposes of lease classification, we assess whether the lease, by its terms, transfers substantially all of the fair value of the asset under lease. This consideration will drive accounting for the alternative classifications among either operating, sales-type, or direct financing types of leases. For classification purposes, we distinguish cash flows that follow under terms of the lease from those that will derive, subsequent to the lease, from the ultimate disposition or re-deployment of the asset. From this segregation of the sources of cash flow, we are able to establish whether the lease is, in essence, a sale or financing in its having transferred substantially all of the fair value of the leased asset. Accordingly, management’s projected residual values represent significant assumptions in our accounting for leases.

While we do not incorporate residual value guarantees in our lease provisions, the contractual structure of other provisions provides a basis for expectations of realizable value from our properties, upon expiration of their lease terms. Additionally, we consider historical, demographic and market trends in developing our estimates. For each new lease, we discount our estimate of unguaranteed residual value and include this amount along with the stream of lease payments (also discounted) called for in

34

Table of Contents

the lease. We assess the stream of lease payments and the value deriving from eventual return of our property to establish whether the lease payments themselves comprise a return of substantially all of the fair value of the property under lease. We do not use a “bright line” in considering what constitutes “substantially all of the fair value,” but we undertake heightened vigilance in our assessment when the lease payments approach 90% of the composition of all future cash flows expected from the asset.

For our mortgage and other notes receivable, we evaluate the estimated collectibility of contractual loan payments amid general economic conditions on the basis of a like-kind pooling of our loans. We estimate credit losses over the entire contractual term of the instrument from the date of initial recognition of that instrument. In developing our expectation of losses, we will consider financial assets that share similar risk characteristics such as rate, age, type, location and adequacy of collateral on a collective basis. Other note investments which do not share common features will continue to be evaluated on an instrument-by-instrument basis.

The determination of fair value and whether a shortfall in operating revenues or the existence of operating losses is indicative of a loss in value involves significant judgment. Our estimates consider all available evidence including, as appropriate, the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at market rates, general economic conditions and trends, the duration of the fair value deficiency, and any other relevant factors. When an economic downturn whose duration is expected to span a year or more is encountered, such as the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, we consider projections about an expected economic recovery before we conclude that evidence of impairment exists. While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on our financial results.

While we believe that the carrying amounts of our properties are recoverable and our notes receivable and other investments are realizable, it is possible that future events could require us to make significant adjustments or revisions to these estimates.

Revenue Recognition

We collect rent and interest from our tenants and borrowers. Generally, our policy is to recognize income on an accrual basis as earned. However, when we determine, based on current collections and the lack of expected future collections, that rent or interest is not probable of collection until received, our policy is to recognize rental or interest income when assured, which we consider to be the period in which cash is received or accrued on the basis of tenant security deposits available to us for the recognition of lease revenue in the period in which it was earned. We identify investments as nonperforming if a required payment is not received within 30 days of the date it is due. This policy could cause our revenues to vary significantly from period to period. Rental income from minimum lease payments under our leases is recognized on a straight-line basis to the extent that future lease payments are considered collectible. Lease payments that depend on a factor directly related to future use of the property, such as an increase in annual revenues over base year revenues, are considered to be contingent rentals and are included in rental income when they are determinable and earned.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include our accounts, the accounts of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and the accounts of joint ventures in which we own a majority voting interest with the ability to control operations and where no substantive participating rights or substantive kick-out rights have been granted to the noncontrolling interests. In addition, we consolidate a legal entity deemed to be a variable interest entity (“VIE”) when we determine that we are the VIE’s primary beneficiary. All material inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

We apply Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance for our arrangements with VIEs which requires us to identify entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights and to determine which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. A VIE is broadly defined as an entity with one or more of the following characteristics: (a) the total equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group, the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about the entity’s activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; or (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. We may change our assessment of a VIE due to events such as modifications of contractual arrangements that affect the characteristics or adequacy of the entity’s equity investments at risk and the disposal of all or a portion of an interest held by the primary beneficiary.

Real Estate Properties

35

Table of Contents

Real property we develop is recorded at cost, including the capitalization of interest during construction. The cost of real property investments we acquire is allocated to net tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities based on their relative fair values. We make estimates as part of our allocation of the purchase price of acquisitions to the various components of the acquisition based upon the fair value of each component. For properties acquired in transactions accounted for as asset purchases, the purchase price, which includes transaction costs, is allocated based on the relative fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired. Cost includes the amount of contingent consideration, if any, deemed to be probable at the acquisition date. Contingent consideration is deemed to be probable to the extent that a significant reversal in amounts recognized is not likely to occur when the uncertainty associated with the contingent consideration is subsequently resolved. The most significant components of our allocations are typically the allocation of fair value to land, equipment, buildings and other improvements, and intangible assets and liabilities, if any. Our estimates of the values of these components will affect the amount of depreciation and amortization we record over the estimated useful life of the property acquired or the remaining lease term.

Investment Highlights

Since January 1, 2020, we have completed or announced the following real estate and note investments ($ in thousands):

Date Properties Asset Class Amount

Real Estate Investments

Note Investments

Bickford Senior Living February 2020 1 SHO 4,000

Bickford

On January 27, 2020, we acquired a 60-unit assisted living/memory care facility located in Shelby, Michigan, from Bickford. The acquisition price was $15,100,000, including $100,000 in closing costs, and the cancellation of an outstanding construction note receivable of $14,091,000, including interest. We added the facility to an existing master lease for a term of twelve years at an initial lease rate of 8%, with CPI escalators subject to a floor and ceiling.

On February 21, 2020, we sold to Bickford two assisted living properties previously classified as held-for-sale in exchange for a term note of $4,000,000.

On June 30, 2020, we entered into a $14,200,000 construction loan agreement with Bickford to construct a 64-unit assisted living facility in Virginia, of which $1,918,000 was funded as of December 31, 2020.

Life Care Services

On January 31, 2020 we acquired an 80% equity interest in a property company, NHI-LCS JV I, LLC (“Timber Ridge PropCo”), which owns a 401-unit CCRC located in Issaquah, Washington comprising 330 independent living units, 26 assisted living/memory care units and 45 skilled nursing beds. The same transaction conveyed to NHI a 25% equity interest in the newly formed operating company, Timber Ridge OpCo, LLC (“Timber Ridge OpCo”).

Total consideration for NHI’s interests in the combined venture was $124,989,000, comprised of the $59,350,000 remaining balance of a mortgage note initially funded in 2015, an additional loan of $21,650,000, and cash of $43,114,000 to Timber Ridge PropCo and $875,000 to Timber Ridge OpCo. Total debt due from Timber Ridge PropCo of $81,000,000, which is eliminated upon consolidation, bears interest to NHI at 5.75%. LCS Timber Ridge LLC (“LCS”) paid $10,778,000 for its 20% equity stake in Timber Ridge PropCo and provided $2,625,000 for a 75% equity participation in Timber Ridge OpCo. To

36

Table of Contents

provide working capital in support of the CCRC’s entry-fee model, NHI agreed to supply a revolving line of credit permitting draws up to a maximum of $5,000,000.

The lease between Timber Ridge PropCo and Timber Ridge OpCo carries a rate of 6.75% for an initial term of seven years plus renewal options and has a CPI-based lease escalator, subject to floor and ceiling. Including interest payments on debt to NHI and our lease participation in the Timber Ridge PropCo, as detailed above, we received approximately $7,532,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020. NHI’s contribution was allocated to our interest in the tangible assets of Timber Ridge PropCo with no material fair value allocated to Timber Ridge OpCo beyond our initial investment. The lease between Timber Ridge PropCo and Timber Ridge OpCo includes an “earn out” provision whereby Timber Ridge OpCo could become eligible for a payment of $10,000,000 based on the attainment of certain operating metrics.

Our investment in Timber Ridge OpCo was structured to be compliant with the provisions of the REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act of 2007 ("RIDEA") which permits us to receive rent payments through a triple-net lease between Timber Ridge PropCo and Timber Ridge OpCo and is designed to give us the opportunity to capture additional value on the improving performance of the operating company through distributions from the TRS. Accordingly, the TRS holds our 25% equity interest in Timber Ridge OpCo in order to provide an organizational structure that will allow the TRS to engage in a broad range of activities and share in cash flows that would otherwise be non-qualifying income under the REIT gross income tests.

Timber Ridge OpCo’s activities are managed through an "eligible independent contractor" subject to the oversight of Timber Ridge OpCo’s executive board. This organizational structure meets the requirements of Internal Revenue Code regulations for TRS entities. LCS is the managing member of Timber Ridge OpCo, although we have retained specific non-controlling rights. As a result of LCS’s retention of operations oversight and control over all day-to-day business matters, our participating influence at Timber Ridge OpCo does not amount to control of the entity.

Timber Ridge OpCo meets the criteria to be considered a variable interest entity based on ASC Topic 810, Consolidation. However, we are not the primary beneficiary of Timber Ridge OpCo as our participating rights do not give us the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact Timber Ridge OpCo’s economic performance. As a result, we report our investment in Timber Ridge OpCo under the equity method of accounting as prescribed by ASC Topic 970, Real Estate - General, Subtopic 323-30 Equity Method and Joint Ventures. Our equity share in the losses of Timber Ridge OpCo during the year ended December 31, 2020 was $3,126,000 and was recorded as a reduction in our carrying value of Timber Ridge OpCo. As of December 31, 2020, we have recognized our share of Timber Ridge OpCo’s operating losses in excess of our initial investment as a result of the Company’s outstanding commitment to fund an additional $5,000,000 under a revolving credit facility. These cumulative losses in excess of our basis of $2,250,000 are included in the line item “Accounts payable and accrued expenses” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Autumn Trace

On May 1, 2020, we acquired two senior housing facilities each with 44 assisted living units for a total purchase price of $14,250,000, including $150,000 in closing costs. The facilities are located in Indiana and are leased to Autumn Trace Senior Communities, which is a new operator relationship for NHI. The 15-year master lease has an initial lease rate of 7.25% with fixed annual escalators of 2.25% and offers two optional extensions of five years each. NHI was also granted a purchase option on a newly opened Indiana facility.

Watermark Retirement

On June 12, 2020, we provided a $5,000,000 loan commitment to Watermark Retirement to provide working capital liquidity in connection with the renewal of an existing lease on two continuing care retirement communities.

41 Management

On September 30, 2020, we acquired a 43-unit assisted living and memory care facility located in Bellevue, Wisconsin, from 41 Management. The acquisition price was $12,300,000 and included the full payment of an outstanding mortgage loan of $3,870,000, plus accrued interest. The property is leased to an affiliate of 41 Management pursuant to a 15-year master lease that has an initial lease rate of 7.5% with fixed annual escalators of 2.5% and offers two optional extensions of five years each.

On November 24, 2020, we committed to providing first mortgage financing to 41 Management, LLC for up to $22,200,000 to construct, a 110-unit independent living, assisted living and memory care community in Sussex, Wisconsin. The approximate four year loan has an annual interest rate of 8.5% and two one year extensions. The agreement includes a purchase option,

37

Table of Contents

effective upon stabilization of the facility. Additional security on the loan includes personal and corporate guarantees and the funding of a $4,900,000 working capital escrow. The total amount funded on the note was $4,040,000 as of December 31, 2020.

Notes Receivable Repayments

On July 31, 2020, Senior Living Communities repaid two fully drawn mezzanine loans of $12,000,000 and $2,000,000, respectively. The purpose of the mezzanine loans were to partially fund construction of a 186-unit senior living campus on Daniel Island in South Carolina, which opened in April 2018. The loans bore interest, payable monthly, at a 10% annual rate.

On September 30, 2020, Evolve repaid a fully drawn mortgage loan of $10,000,000, including accrued interest. The loan bore interest, payable monthly, at an 8% annual rate.

Asset Dispositions

As of December 31, 2019, we classified a portfolio of eight assisted living properties located in Arizona (4), Tennessee (3) and South Carolina (1) as held for sale, after the current tenant, Brookdale Senior Living, expressed an intention to exercise its purchase option on the properties. The purchase option called for the parties to split any appreciation on a 50/50 basis above $37,520,000. During the first quarter of 2020, NHI and the tenant agreed to a fair valuation of $41,000,000 for the properties, and, accordingly, on January 22, 2020, we disposed of the properties at the agreed price of $39,260,000. We recognized rental income from this portfolio of $229,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020 and $4,250,000 for both of the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

On February 21, 2020, we disposed of two assisted living properties previously classified as held-for-sale in exchange for a term note of $4,000,000 from the buyer, Bickford. The note, which is due February 2025 and bears interest at 7%, began amortizing on a 25-year basis in January 2021. In January 2019, we classified these properties as held-for-sale, recorded an adjustment to lease revenues to write off the associated $124,000 in straight-line receivables and recognized an impairment loss of $2,500,000 to write down the properties to their estimated net realizable value.

Tenant Purchase Options

Certain of our leases contain purchase options allowing tenants to acquire the leased properties. For options open or coming open in the near future, we are engaged in preliminary negotiations to continue as lessor or in some other capacity.

A summary of these tenant options, excluding properties classified as held for sale, is presented below ($ in thousands):

Asset Number of Lease 1st Option Option Contractual

Type Properties Expiration Open Year Basis Rent

1 In January 2021, we received notification of tenant’s intention to exercise its purchase option on the property in July 2021 for approximately $26,375,000.

Tenant purchase options generally give the lessee an option to purchase the underlying property for consideration determined by (i) greater of fixed base price or fair market value; (ii) a fixed base price plus a specified share in any appreciation; (iii) fixed base price; or (iv) a fixed capitalization rate on lease revenue.

We cannot reasonably estimate at this time the probability that these purchase options will be exercised in the future. Consideration to be received from the exercise of any tenant purchase option is expected to exceed our net investment in the leased property or properties.

38

Table of Contents

Other

Our leases are typically structured as “triple net leases” on single-tenant properties having an initial leasehold term of 10 to 15 years with one or more 5-year renewal options. As such, there may be reporting periods in which we experience few, if any, lease renewals or expirations. There were no material renewing or expiring leases during 2020 that did not renew.

Most of our existing leases contain annual escalators in rent payments. For financial statement purposes, rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Certain of our operators hold purchase options allowing them to acquire properties they currently lease from NHI. Typically, for options open or coming open in the short term, we are engaged in negotiations to continue as lessor or in some other capacity.

Tenant Concentration

As discussed in more detail in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, we have four lessees (including their affiliated entities, which are the legal tenants) from whom we individually derive at least 10% and collectively 53% of our rental income.

The following table summarizes the average portfolio occupancy for Senior Living Communities, Bickford and Holiday for the periods indicated, excluding development properties in operation less than 24 months, notes receivable, and properties transitioned to new operators or disposed. NHC is a publicly traded company and we do not report specific occupancy information from them.

Tenant Monitoring

Our operators report to us the results of their operations on a periodic basis, which we in turn subject to further analysis as a means of monitoring potential concerns within our portfolio. We have identified EBITDARM (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent and management fees) as a primary performance measure for our tenants, based on results they have reported to us. We believe EBITDARM is useful in our most fundamental analyses, as it is a property-level measure of our operators’ success, by eliminating the effects of the operator’s method of acquiring the use of its assets (interest and rent), its non-cash expenses (depreciation and amortization), expenses that are dependent on its level of success (income taxes), and also excluding the effect of the operator’s payment of its management fees, as typically those fees are contractually subordinate to our lease payment. For operators of our entrance-fee communities, our calculation of EBITDARM includes other cash flow adjustments typical of the industry which may include, but are not limited to, net cash flows from entrance fees; amortization of deferred entrance fees; adjustments for tenant rent obligations, depreciation and amortization; and management fee true-ups. The eliminations and adjustments reflect covenants in our leases and provide a comparable basis for assessing our various relationships.

We believe that EBITDARM is a useful way to analyze the cash potential of a group of assets. From EBITDARM we calculate a coverage ratio (EBITDARM/Cash Rent), measuring the ability of the operator to meet its monthly obligation. In addition to EBITDARM and the coverage ratio, we rely on a careful balance sheet analysis, and other analytical procedures to help us identify potential areas of concern relative to our operators’ ability to generate sufficient liquidity to meet their obligations, including their obligation to continue to pay the amount due to us. Typical among our operators is a varying lag in reporting to us the results of their operations. Across our portfolio, however, our operators report their results, typically within either 30 or 45 days and at the latest, within 90 days of month’s end. For computational purposes, we exclude development and lease-up properties that have been in operation less than 24 months and selected immaterial properties identified in 2019 as available for sale and subsequently sold in the first quarter of 2020. For stabilized acquisitions in the portfolio less than 24 months and renewing leases with changes in scheduled rent, we include pro forma cash rent. Same-store portfolio coverage excludes properties that have transitioned operators in past 24 months.

The results of our coverage ratio analysis are presented in the tables below on a trailing twelve-month basis, as of September 30, 2020 and 2019 (the most recent periods available). The tables exclude mortgages and other notes receivable, transitioned properties leased pursuant to cash flow-based leases, and development and lease up properties in operation less

39

Table of Contents

than 24 months. The tables include pro forma rents for stabilized acquisitions in the portfolio less than 24 months. Same-store portfolio coverage excludes properties that have transitioned operators in past 24 months.

Total Portfolio

SHO SNF HOSP MOB TOTAL

NHC1 SLC Bickford Holiday

Same-Store Portfolio

SHO SNF HOSP MOB Total

NHC 1 SLC Bickford Holiday

1 NHC based on corporate-level Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio and includes 3 independent living facilities.

These results include any amounts received and recognized by the operators from the HHS CARES Act Provider Relief Fund but do not include any funds received under the Paycheck Protection Program. Our operators may not consistently account for any pandemic relief funds received which can impact comparability among operators and across periods.

Fluctuations in portfolio coverage are a result of market and economic trends, local market competition, and regulatory factors as well as the operational success of our tenants. We use the results of individual leases to inform our decision making with respect to specific tenants, but trends described above by property type and operator bear analysis. Our senior housing portfolio shows a decline brought about primarily by a softening in occupancy and lower net entrance-fees within particular

40

Table of Contents

markets, as well as rising wage pressures. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S. has further softened coverage for these operators as well as across our portfolio. For many of the affected operators, as is typical of our portfolio in general, NHI has security deposit escrows in place and/or corporate guarantees should actual cash rental shortfalls eventually materialize. In certain instances, our operators may increase their security deposits with us in an amount equal to the coverage shortfall, and, upon subsequent compliance with the required lease coverage ratio, the operator would then be entitled to a full refund. The sufficiency of credit enhancements (e.g. tenant deposits and guarantees) as a protection against economic downturn will be a focus as the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic continue. The metrics presented in the tables above give no effect to the presence of these security deposit escrows. Each MOB’s coverage is driven by the underlying performance of its on-campus hospital as the tenant or guarantor under the lease. As a result, it is typical for MOB operations to have large fluctuations in coverage resulting from hospital operations.

Other Portfolio Activity

Tenant Transitioning

Nine properties were transitioned during 2019 to five new tenants following a period of non-compliance by the former operators. Two leases with the new tenants for six of these properties specify periods during which rental income is based on operating income, net of management fees. We recognized rental income from these nine properties for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 of $4,593,000 and $3,643,000, respectively. No properties were transitioned during 2020.

The following table summarizes the transition properties during the year ended December 31, 2020:

Occupancy1

1 Monthly Average

Real Estate and Mortgage Write-downs

In addition to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, our borrowers and tenants experience periods of significant financial pressures and difficulties similar to those encountered by other health care providers. Our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 do not reflect any significant impairment of our long-lived assets as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic or other factors. We have no significant intangible assets currently recorded on our balance sheet for the year ended December 31, 2020 that would require assessment for impairment. In 2019, we recognized an impairment loss of $2,500,000 to write down properties to their estimated net realizable value.

In July 2020, Quorum Health Corporation (“Quorum”) completed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy restructuring. As a result, NHI wrote off straight-line rent receivable under the lease of $380,000 in the first quarter of 2020 and began recognizing revenues under the lease as cash is received. Quorum continues to operate the hospital while timely paying its rent under the lease, which totaled $3,523,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Effective January 1, 2020, we adopted ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, which broadened the information we must consider in developing our expected credit loss estimates to include forecasted economic information in addition to our historical experience. We have established a reserve for estimated credit losses of $4,946,000 and a liability of $270,000 for estimated credit losses on unfunded loan commitments as of December 31, 2020. We evaluate the reserves for estimated credit losses each reporting period and make adjustments based on current circumstances as considered necessary.

We believe that the carrying amounts of our real estate properties are recoverable and that mortgage and other notes receivable are realizable and supported by the value of the underlying collateral. However, it is possible that future events could require us to make significant adjustments to these carrying amounts.

41

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The significant items affecting revenues and expenses are described below ($ in thousands):

Years Ended

December 31, Period Change

Revenues:

Rental income

CCRC leased to Timber Ridge OpCo $ 8,346 $ — $ 8,346 NM

SNF leased to Ignite Team Partners 1,492 — 1,492 NM

ALFs leased to Autumn Trace Communities 689 — 689 NM

Interest income from mortgage and other notes

Discovery Senior Living mortgage and other notes 482 154 328 NM

Life Care Services mortgages and construction loans 11,438 12,113 (675) (5.6) %

Expenses:

Depreciation

CCRC leased to Timber Ridge OpCo 3,436 — 3,436 NM

SNF leased to Ignite Team Partners 445 — 445 NM

Loss on early retirement of debt (3,924) (823) (3,101) NM

Loss from equity method investment (3,126) — (3,126) NM

NM - not meaningful

42

Table of Contents

Financial highlights of the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to 2019 were as follows:

•Rental income received from our tenants increased $13,026,000, or 4.4%, primarily as a result of new investments funded since December 2019, net of rent concessions granted in 2020 totaling $6,972,000.

•Funds received for reimbursement of property operating expenses total $9,653,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020, and are reflected as a component of rental income. These property operating expenses are recognized in operating expenses in the line item “Taxes and insurance on lease properties.” The increase in the reimbursement income and corresponding property expenses is the result of additional amounts received from tenants and expenses paid on their behalf.

•Rental income includes a $1,673,000 decrease in straight-line rent adjustments based on the timing and volume of entering into new leases and the overall rate of increase in existing leases.

•Interest income from mortgage and other notes increased $1,323,000, primarily due to interest income received on loans to Bickford Senior Living, 41 Management and Discovery Senior Living net of note payoffs during 2020.

•Depreciation expense increased $6,334,000 primarily due to new real estate investments completed since December 2019.

•Interest expense decreased $3,417,000 primarily as a result of $210,000,000 notional amount of fixed rate swaps that matured in June 2020 that relate to the unsecured credit facility and the payoff of the HUD mortgages discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, as well as the decrease in our LIBOR reference rate on our unswapped variable rate debt.

•Loan and realty losses include $2,500,000 in write-downs recognized in 2019 related to two facilities classified as held for sale and subsequently sold in the first quarter of 2020. Loan and realty losses recorded in 2020 relate to adjustments made to our estimate of expected credit losses.

•Loss on early retirement of debt in 2020 represents the prepayment fee of $1,619,000 and unamortized discount and deferred financing cost of $1,172,000 and $1,133,000, respectively, recognized on the repayment of ten HUD mortgages loans in 2020. The prior year amount represents the loss recognized upon the repayment of $60,000,000 of the convertible notes.

•During 2020, we recorded $3,126,000 as our equity share in the losses of Timber Ridge OpCo as described in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.

•During 2020, we recorded $21,316,000 in gains from the disposition of real estate assets as described under the heading “Asset Dispositions” in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.

•The following table summarizes our real estate under lease to transitioning tenants ($ in thousands):

43

Table of Contents

Years Ended

December 31, Period Change

Revenues:

Rental income

SHOs leased to Chancellor Health Care $ 850 $ 1,162 $ (312) (26.9) %

SHO leased to Senior Living Communities 166 — 166 NM

SHO leased to Discovery Senior Living 62 — 62 NM

Expenses:

Depreciation

SHOs leased to Chancellor Health Care 1,623 1,623 — — %

SHO leased to Senior Living Communities 617 527 90 17.1 %

SHO leased to Discovery Senior Living 686 684 2 0.3 %

SLC leased to Vitality Senior Living 631 616 15 2.4 %

ALF leased to BAKA Enterprises 539 581 (42) (7.2) %

Franchise, excise and other taxes — 660 (660) (100.0) %

1 includes $625,000 received during 2019 as a settlement payment

44

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, 2020, we had $252,000,000 available to draw on our revolving credit facility, $43,344,000 in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, and the potential to access capital through the issuance of common stock under the Company’s $500,000,000 ATM equity program. In addition, the Company maintains an effective automatic shelf registration statement through which capital could be raised via the issuance of debt and or equity securities.

In July 2020, we entered into a new one-year $100,000,000 term loan bearing interest at a rate of 30-day LIBOR (with a 50 basis point floor) plus 185 basis points, based on our current leverage ratios. The proceeds from this loan were used to repay amounts outstanding on the unsecured revolving credit facility. The term loan was subsequently repaid in January 2021.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we issued 535,990 common shares through the ATM program with an average price of $66.30, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $34,649,000 initially used to pay down our revolving credit facility. During the year ended December 31, 2019, 1,209,522 common shares were issued for $95,774,000 in net proceeds. We intend to use the proceeds from any further activity under the ATM program for general corporate purposes, which may include future acquisitions and repayment of indebtedness, including borrowings under our credit facility.

On October 30 and November 2, 2020, the Company repaid ten HUD mortgage loans with a combined balance of $42,629,000, plus accrued interest of $157,000 and a prepayment fee of $1,619,000. The HUD mortgage loans were secured by ten properties leased to Bickford with a net book value of $47,436,000. Nine of the mortgage notes required monthly payments of principal and interest from 4.3% to 4.4% (inclusive of mortgage insurance premiums) with maturities in August and October 2049. One additional HUD mortgage loan assumed in 2014 at a discount, required monthly payments of principal and interest of 2.9% (inclusive of mortgage insurance premium) and had an original maturity of October 2047.

On January 26, 2021, we issued $400,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 3.00% senior notes that mature on February 1, 2031 and pay interest semi-annually (the “2031 Senior Notes”). The 2031 Senior Notes were sold at an issue price of 99.196% of face value before the underwriters’ discount. Our net proceeds from the 2031 Senior Notes offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and expenses, were approximately $392,431,000. We used the net proceeds from the 2031 Senior Notes offering to repay our $100,000,000 term loan and reduce borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility.

Sources and Uses of Funds

Our primary sources of cash include rent payments, principal and interest payments on mortgage and other notes receivable, proceeds from the sales of real property, net proceeds from offerings of equity securities and borrowings from our loans and revolving credit facility. Our primary uses of cash include debt service payments (both principal and interest), new investments in real estate and notes receivable, dividend distributions to our stockholders and general corporate overhead.

These sources and uses of cash are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as summarized below ($ in thousands):

Year Ended One Year Change Year Ended One Year Change

Operating Activities – Net cash provided by operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 was favorably impacted by the collection of lease and interest payments on new real estate and note investments completed during 2020 and 2019. Working capital changes contributed an additional $19,271,000 to operating cash flow in 2019 that included approximately $17,125,000 in cash receipts in settlement of a Holiday receivable, charged to deferred revenues and straight line rent receivables related to the Holiday restructure.

Investing Activities – Net cash flows used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 were comprised primarily of $175,080,000 of investments in real estate and notes, and was partially offset by the collection of principal on mortgage and other notes receivable of $46,612,000 and $39,631,000 in net proceeds from the disposition of real estate assets. Net cash flows used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 were comprised primarily of $345,418,000 of investments in real estate and notes, which were partially offset by collection of notes receivable.

45

Table of Contents

Financing Activities – Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019 is primarily the result of a $118,000,000 decrease in net borrowings, inclusive of the $100,000,000 term loan in 2020, a $61,125,000 decrease in proceeds from issuance of common shares and dividend payments which increased $14,845,000 over the same period in 2019.

Debt Obligations

As of December 31, 2020, we had outstanding debt of $1,499,285,000. See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about our outstanding indebtedness. Also, reference “Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” for more details on our indebtedness and the impact of interest rate risk.

Unsecured Bank Credit Facility - Our bank credit facility derives from the Credit Agreement dated as of August 3, 2017 (the “2017 Agreement”), and two Term Loan Agreements dated as of September 17, 2018 (the “2018 Agreement”) and July 9, 2020 (the “2020 Agreement”). Together these agreements establish our unsecured $1,200,000,000 bank credit facility, which consists of three term loans –$100,000,000 maturing in July 2021, $250,000,000 maturing in August 2022 and $300,000,000 maturing in September 2023 - and a $550,000,000 revolving credit facility that matures in August 2021 with a one year extension option available after payment of a 10 basis point extension fee. The $100,000,000 term loan was repaid in January 2021 with the proceeds from the 2031 Senior Notes previously described.

The revolving facility fee is currently 20 basis points per annum, and based on our current leverage ratios, the facility presently provides for floating interest on the revolver and the term loans at 30-day LIBOR plus 120 basis points and a blended 132 basis points, respectively. At December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, 30-day LIBOR was 14 basis points and 176 basis points, respectively. Through June 2020, the Company utilized $610,000,000 in interest rate swaps, designated as cash flow hedges, to fix the variable interest rate on the amounts outstanding on our term loans and revolving credit facility. On June 29 and 30, 2020, $80,000,000 and $130,000,000 of these hedges expired, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, we had $548,000,000 of outstanding variable rate debt exposed to interest rate risk through December 2021, at which time our remaining hedges expire. Our swaps and the financial instruments to which they relate are described in the table below, under the caption “Interest Rate Swap Agreements.” The current interest spreads and facility fee reflect our leverage-ratio compliance based on the applicable margin for LIBOR loans, measuring debt to “Total Asset Value,” at Level 3 in the Interest Rate Schedule provided below in summary format:

Interest Rate Schedule

LIBOR Margin

Beyond the applicable ratios detailed above, increasing levels of leverage (not shown) will subject our debt to defined increases in interest rates and fees.

The 2017 Agreement requires that we calculate specified financial statement metrics and meet or exceed a variety of financial ratios, which are usual and customary in nature. These ratios are calculated quarterly and as of December 31, 2020, were within required limits. The calculation of our leverage ratio involves intermediate determinations of our “total indebtedness” and of our “total asset value,” as defined in the 2017 agreement. As discussed below in connection with our leverage-based LIBOR Margin schedule, under provisions of which we are given credit for collateral based on cash rental revenue (capitalized at standard rates based on asset class), if we experience significant declines in rent collections, we could shift to Level 4 or beyond, resulting in significant additional interest expense.

The 2020 and 2018 Agreements generally include the same covenants and financial statement metrics required for compliance with terms of the 2017 Agreement. Although we are currently eligible under the term loan agreements to transact in our unsecured bank credit facilities at the respective scheduled rates represented by Level 3, the movement of our leverage ratio into Level 4 at current levels of debt would result in additional annual interest charges of $1,074,000, assuming an average revolver balance of approximately $298,000,000. Further movement of our leverage ratio beyond levels currently contemplated

46

Table of Contents

by management would be subject to escalating increases in interest. If, in addition to changes in the leverage ratio, certain qualitative indicators of our risk profile were to materially change, further interest-rate escalations may result.

We remain in compliance with all debt covenants under the unsecured bank credit facility and other debt agreements.

Convertible Senior Notes - As of December 31, 2020, our $60,000,000 of senior unsecured convertible notes were convertible at a rate of 14.95 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount, representing a conversion price of approximately $66.89 per share for a total of 896,994 shares. For the year ended December 31, 2020, there was no dilution resulting from the conversion option within our convertible debt. If NHI’s current share price increases above the adjusted $66.89 conversion price, dilution may become attributable to the conversion feature. At December 31, 2020, the face amount of the convertible debt exceeded its value on conversion, when value on conversion was computed as if the debt were immediately eligible to convert.

Effective October 1, 2020, the conversion feature was generally available to noteholders. The notes are “optional net-share settlement” instruments, allowing NHI the option to settle the principal amount of the indebtedness in cash and common stock for any excess. The amounts and timing of conversions will depend on prevailing market conditions, liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors.

When we take on new debt or when we modify or replace existing debt, we incur debt issuance costs. These costs are subject to amortization over the term of the new debt instrument and may result in the write-off of fees associated with debt which has been replaced or modified. Sustaining long-term dividend growth will require that we consider all sources of capital mentioned above, with the goal of maintaining a low-leverage balance sheet and staggered debt maturities as mitigation against potential adverse changes in the business of our industry, tenants and borrowers.

Debt Maturities - Reference Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for more information on our debt maturities.

Credit Ratings - Moody's announced on November 5, 2020 that it assigned an investment grade issuer credit rating and a senior unsecured debt rating of Baa3 with a “Negative” outlook to the Company. Both Fitch and S&P Global announced in November 2019 a public issuer credit rating of BBB- with an outlook of “Stable”. Fitch confirmed its rating most recently on September 30, 2020 and S&P Global confirmed its rating on November 4, 2020. Our unsecured bank credit facility includes an option to shift from the leverage-based LIBOR margin schedule in the table above to a ratings-based LIBOR margin schedule. Shifting to a ratings-based LIBOR margin schedule potentially reduces volatility of our interest cost during periods of time when our leverage may fluctuate modestly. Our decision to move to a ratings-based LIBOR margin schedule will be based on several factors including the relative cost of the ratings-based versus leverage-based LIBOR margin schedules and our desire to have a more stable interest cost if our leverage modestly changes as compared to the existing leverage-based LIBOR margin schedule. Our unsecured private placement term loan agreements include a rate increase provision that is effective if any rating agency lowers our credit rating below investment grade and our compliance leverage increases to 50% or more.

Reference Rate Reform - LIBOR is scheduled for discontinuation by December 2021. In the United States, the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, a group convened by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York has identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate as its preferred alternative rate for USD LIBOR. The Company continues to monitor the establishment of a new replacement index with the assistance of its banking advisors. We may choose not to hedge any more of our LIBOR positions for the relatively short duration remaining during which LIBOR may be referenced.

If a suitable replacement to LIBOR is not identified, bank facilities provide for rate alternatives which have historically been disadvantageous. Upon the discontinuation of LIBOR, the imposition of a new index rate may materially change interest expense and the credit spread, relative to that determined under the Company’s original pricing structure. Upon the issuance of the 2031 Senior Notes, the company has reduced its LIBOR based financial instruments.

Debt Metrics - We believe that our fixed charge coverage ratio, which is the ratio of Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, including amounts in discontinued operations, excluding real estate asset impairments and gains on dispositions) to fixed charges (interest expense at contractual rates net of capitalized interest and principal payments on debt), and the ratio of consolidated net debt to Adjusted EBITDA are meaningful measures of our ability to service our debt. We use these two measures as a useful basis to compare the strength of our balance sheet with those in our peer group. We also believe our balance sheet gives us a competitive advantage when accessing debt markets.

We calculate our fixed charge coverage ratio as approximately 6.0x for the year ended December 31, 2020 (see our discussion below under the heading Adjusted EBITDA including a reconciliation to our net income). Giving effect to our

47

Table of Contents

acquisitions and financings on an annualized basis, our consolidated net debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio is approximately 4.7x for the year ended December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

Less: cash and cash equivalents (43,344)

Annualized Adjustment 2,066

Consolidated Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA 4.7 x

Interest Rate Swap Agreements

Our existing interest rate swap agreements will collectively continue through December 2021 as a hedge against fluctuations in variable interest rates applicable to $400,000,000 of our bank loans. In June 2020, there were $210,000,000 notional amount of swaps that matured. During the next year, approximately $7,149,000 of losses, which are included in “Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, are projected to be reclassified into earnings.

As of December 31, 2020, we employed the following interest rate swap contracts to mitigate our interest rate risk on our bank term and revolver loans described above ($ in thousands):

For instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative has been reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss), and reclassified into earnings in the same period, or periods, during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness have been recognized in earnings.

Supplemental Guarantor Financial Information

The Company’s $1,200,000,000 bank credit facility, unsecured private placement term loans due January 2023 through January 2027 with an aggregate principal amount of $400,000,000, and 2031 Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of the Company’s subsidiaries, except for certain excluded subsidiaries (“Guarantors”). The Guarantors are either owned, controlled or are affiliates of the Company.

The following tables present summarized financial information for the Company and the Guarantors, on a combined basis after eliminating (i) intercompany transactions and balances among the guarantor entities and (ii) equity in earnings from, and any investments in, any subsidiary that is a non-guarantor ($ in thousands):

48

Table of Contents

As of

Real estate properties, net $ 2,341,406

Note receivable due from non-guarantor subsidiary 81,396

Noncontrolling interest $ 531

Year Ended

Interest revenue on note due from non-guarantor subsidiary 4,275

Loss from equity method investee (3,126)

Gains on sales of real estate 21,316

Loss on early retirement of debt (3,924)

Net income attributable to NHI and the subsidiary guarantors $ 172,954

Equity

At December 31, 2020, we had 45,185,992 shares of common stock outstanding with a market value of $3,125,516,000. Equity on our Consolidated Balance Sheet totaled $1,522,945,000.

Dividends - We manage our business with a goal of increasing the regular annual dividends paid to stockholders. Our Board of Directors approves a regular quarterly dividend which is reflective of expected taxable income on a recurring basis. Our transactions that are infrequent and non-recurring that generate additional taxable income have been distributed to stockholders in the form of special dividends. Taxable income is determined in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code and differs from net income for financial statements purposes determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our goal of increasing annual dividends requires a careful balance between identification of high-quality lease and mortgage assets in which to invest and the cost of our capital with which to fund such investments. We consider the competing interests of short and long-term debt (interest rates, maturities and other terms) versus the higher cost of new equity. We accept some level of risk associated with leveraging our investments. We intend to continue to make new investments that meet our underwriting criteria and where the spreads over our cost of equity and debt capital on a leverage neutral basis will generate sufficient returns to our stockholders.

We intend to comply with REIT dividend requirements that we distribute at least 90% of our annual taxable income for the year ended December 31, 2020 and thereafter. Historically, the Company has distributed at least 100% of annual taxable income. Dividends declared for the fourth quarter of each fiscal year are paid by the end of the following January and are, with some exceptions, treated for tax purposes as having been paid in the fiscal year just ended as provided in IRS Code Sec. 857(b)(8).

Our dividends per share for the last three years are as follows:

49

Table of Contents

ATM Equity Program - We maintain an ATM program which allows us to sell our common stock directly into the market. In March 2020 the Company entered into a new ATM equity offering sales agreement pursuant to which the Company may sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate sales price of $500,000,000 of the Company’s common shares through the ATM equity program. The Company terminated its previously existing ATM equity program, dated February 22, 2017, upon entering into the new agreement. During 2020, we issued 535,990 common shares through the ATM program with an average price of $66.30, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $34,649,000. During 2019, we issued 1,209,522 shares under the February 22, 2017 program, with an average price of $80.58 per share, generating net proceeds of approximately $95,774,000.

The following table summarizes the share issuances under our ATM program as of December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

Year Shares Weighted Average Share Price Net Proceeds

The table above does not include indirect legal and accounting costs associated with updating and maintaining our shelf registration statement.

Our use of ATM proceeds rebalanced our leverage in response to our acquisitions and keeps our options flexible for further expansion. We anticipate continued use of proceeds from the ATM program for general corporate purposes, which may include future acquisitions and repayment of indebtedness, including borrowings under our credit facility. As we continue to acquire real estate, we will continue to explore various other funding sources including term loans, convertible debt, traditional equity placement, unsecured bonds and senior notes, debt private placement, public debt and secured government agency financing to balance the overall degree of leverage on our portfolio. We view our ATM program as an effective way to match-fund our smaller acquisitions by exercising control over the timing and size of transactions and achieving a more favorable cost of capital as compared to larger follow-on offerings. Acquisitions, if any, whose magnitude would entail an equity match unable to be efficiently sourced through the ATM would likely trigger a prospectus supplement and an overnight or marketed offering of NHI common stock, rather than placement through the ATM.

Shelf Registration Statement - In March 2020, the Company renewed its automatic shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission that allows the Company to offer and sell to the public an unspecified amount of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants and or units at prices and on terms to be announced when and if such securities are offered. The details of any future offerings, along with the use of proceeds from any securities offered, will be described in a prospectus supplement or other offering materials, at the time of offering. Our shelf registration statement expires March 2023.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As part of the Timber Ridge transaction in January 2020, we acquired the property subject to trust liens previously granted to residents of Timber Ridge. Beginning in 2008, the initial residents of Timber Ridge executed loans to the then owner/operators which were backed by a Deed of Trust and Indenture of Trust (the “Deed and Indenture”) for the benefit of the trustee (now Wilmington Trust, N.A., “Trustee”) on behalf of all the residents who made loans to the owner/operator in accordance with a resident agreement. The Deed and Indenture granted a security interest in the Timber Ridge property to secure the loans made by the residents of the property. Subsequent to these early transactions, the repayment obligation with respect to “new” loans made to the owner/operator was no longer secured by the Timber Ridge property under the Deed and Indenture.

Our entry into the Timber Ridge transaction involved the separation of the existing owner/operator configuration into property and operating companies. Accomplishing the split required the allocation of assets and liabilities of the previously unified entity. Timber Ridge PropCo acquired the Timber Ridge property, subject to the resident mortgages secured by the Deed and Indenture. Accordingly, the remaining outstanding “old” loans made by the residents are still secured by a security interest in the Timber Ridge property. The trustee for all of the residents who made “old” loans in accordance with the resident agreements, entered into a subordination agreement concurrent with our acquisition, pursuant to which the Trustee acknowledged and confirmed that the security interests created under the Deed and Indenture were subordinate to any security interests granted in connection with the loan made by NHI to Timber Ridge PropCo.

With the periodic settlement of some of the outstanding resident loans in the normal course of entrance-fee operations, the balance secured by the Deed and Indenture at the date of our acquisition on January 31, 2020 had been reduced to $20,063,000

50

Table of Contents

and was further reduced to $17,155,300 at December 31, 2020. By terms of the resident loan assumption agreement, during the term of the lease (seven years with two renewal options), Timber Ridge OpCo is to indemnify Timber Ridge PropCo for any repayment by Timber Ridge PropCo of these liabilities under the guarantee. As a result of the subordination agreement mentioned above and Timber Ridge OpCo’s indemnity guarantee, a liability was not recorded for the resident loan obligation upon acquisition and as of December 31, 2020.

As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, our leases, mortgages and other notes receivable with certain unconsolidated entities represent variable interests in those enterprises. However, because we do not control these entities, nor do we have any role in their day-to-day management, we are not their primary beneficiary and therefore do not consolidate their financial statements. Except as discussed, under Contractual Obligations and Contingent Liabilities, we have no further material obligations arising from our transactions with these entities, and we believe our maximum exposure to loss at December 31, 2020, due to this involvement would be limited to our contractual commitments and contingent liabilities and the amount of our current investments with them, as detailed further in Notes 2, 3, 5 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements.

In March 2014, we issued convertible notes, which have a carrying amount of $60,000,000 as of December 31, 2020 and mature April 1, 2021. For the conversion feature we calculate the dilutive effect using market prices prevailing over the reporting period. Because the dilution calculation is market-driven, and per share guidance we provide is based on diluted amounts, the theoretical effects of the conversion feature result in per share unpredictability.

Effective October 1, 2020, the notes were convertible, however, generally accepted accounting principles require us to periodically report the amount by which the notes’ convertible value exceeds their principal amount, without regard to the current availability of the conversion feature. Further, the mechanics of the calculation require the use of an end-of-period stock price, so that using that amount for the remaining notes outstanding of $60,000,000 at December 31, 2020 delivers an excess of $2,045,000, whereas the use of another price point would give a different result.

The notes are “optional net-share settlement” instruments, meaning that NHI has the option to settle the principal amount of the indebtedness in cash, with possible dilutive share issuances for any excess. Settlement of the notes requires management to allocate the consideration we ultimately pay between the debt component and the equity conversion feature as though they were separate instruments. The allocation is effected by valuing the debt component first, with any remainder allocated to the conversion feature. Amounts expended to settle the notes will be recognized first as a settlement of the notes at par and then will be recognized in income to the extent the portion allocated to the debt instrument differs from par value. The remainder of the allocation, if any, will be treated as settlement of equity and adjusted through our paid in capital account.

Contractual Obligations and Contingent Liabilities

As of December 31, 2020, our contractual payment obligations were as follows ($ in thousands):

Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years More than 5 years

Development commitments 5,156 5,156 — — —

1 Interest is calculated based on the weighted average interest rate of outstanding debt balances as of December 31, 2020. The calculation also includes a facility fee of 0.20%.

Commitments and Contingencies

The following tables summarize information as of December 31, 2020 related to our outstanding commitments and contingencies which are more fully described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements ($ in thousands):

51

Table of Contents

Asset Class Type Total Funded Remaining

Loan Commitments:

LCS Sagewood Note B SHO Construction 61,200 (61,200) —

Senior Living Communities SHO Revolving Credit 12,000 (11,280) 720

Timber Ridge OpCo SHO Working Capital 5,000 — 5,000

Watermark Retirement SHO Working Capital 5,000 — 5,000

Discovery Senior Living SHO Working Capital 750 (750) —

See Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements for full details of our loan commitments. As provided above, loans funded do not include the effects of discounts or commitment fees.

The credit loss liability for unfunded loan commitments is estimated using the same methodology as for our funded mortgage and other notes receivable based on the estimated amount that we expect to fund. The liability for expected credit losses on our unfunded loans was $270,000 as of December 31, 2020.

Asset Class Type Total Funded Remaining

Development Commitments:

Ignite Medical Resorts SNF Construction $ 25,350 $ (25,350) $ —

Senior Living Communities SHO Renovation 9,930 (9,763) 167

Discovery Senior Living SHO Renovation 900 (853) 47

In addition to the commitments listed above, Discovery PropCo has committed to Discovery for funding up to $2,000,000 toward the purchase of condominium units located at one of the facilities, of which $968,000 has been funded as of December 31, 2020.

Asset Class Total Funded Remaining

Contingencies (Lease Inducements):

Comfort Care Senior Living SHO 6,000 — 6,000

Discovery Senior Living SHO 4,000 — 4,000

We adjust rental income for the amortization of lease inducements paid to our tenants. Amortization of these payments against revenues was $987,000, $845,000 and $387,000 for the years ended December 31, 2020 , 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Litigation

Our facilities are subject to claims and suits in the ordinary course of business. Our lessees and borrowers have indemnified, and are obligated to continue to indemnify us, against all liabilities arising from the operation of the facilities, and are further obligated to indemnify us against environmental or title problems affecting the real estate underlying such facilities. While there may be lawsuits pending against certain of the owners and/or lessees of the facilities, management believes that the ultimate resolution of all such pending proceedings will have no material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

52

Table of Contents

In June 2018, East Lake Capital Management LLC and certain related entities, including Regency (for three assisted living facilities in Tennessee, Indiana and North Carolina), filed suit against NHI in Texas seeking injunctive and declaratory relief and unspecified monetary damages. NHI responded with counterclaims and filed motions requesting the immediate appointment of a receiver and for pre-judgment possession. Resulting from these claims and counterclaims, on December 6, 2018, the parties entered into an agreement resulting in Regency vacating the facilities in December 2018. Litigation is ongoing.

FFO, AFFO & FAD

These supplemental operating performance measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other REITs. Consequently, our Funds From Operations (“FFO”), Normalized FFO, Normalized Adjusted Funds From Operations (“AFFO”) and Normalized Funds Available for Distribution (“FAD”) may not provide a meaningful measure of our performance as compared to that of other REITs. Since other REITs may not use our definition of these operating performance measures, caution should be exercised when comparing our FFO, Normalized FFO, Normalized AFFO and Normalized FAD to that of other REITs. These financial performance measures do not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) (these measures do not include changes in operating assets and liabilities) and therefore should not be considered an alternative to net earnings as an indication of operating performance, or to net cash flow from operating activities as determined by GAAP as a measure of liquidity, and are not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs.

Funds From Operations - FFO

Our FFO per diluted common share for the year ended December 31, 2020 increased $0.02 or 0.4% over the same period in 2019 due primarily to the impact of new investments completed since December 2019, partially offset by the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. FFO, as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) and applied by us, is net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of real estate property, impairments of real estate, and real estate depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, if any. The Company’s computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or have a different interpretation of the current NAREIT definition from that of the Company; therefore, caution should be exercised when comparing our Company’s FFO to that of other REITs. Diluted FFO assumes the exercise of stock options and other potentially dilutive securities.

Our Normalized FFO per diluted common share for the year ended December 31, 2020 increased $0.10 or 1.8% over the same period in 2019 due primarily to the impact of new investments completed since December 2019, partially offset by the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Normalized FFO excludes from FFO certain items which, due to their infrequent or unpredictable nature, may create some difficulty in comparing FFO for the current period to similar prior periods, and may include, but are not limited to, impairment of non-real estate assets, gains and losses attributable to the acquisition and disposition of non-real estate assets and liabilities, and recoveries of previous write-downs.

FFO and Normalized FFO are important supplemental measures of operating performance for a REIT. Because the historical cost accounting convention used for real estate assets requires depreciation (except on land), such accounting presentation implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen and fallen with market conditions, presentations of operating results for a REIT that uses historical cost accounting for depreciation could be less informative, and should be supplemented with a measure such as FFO. The term FFO was designed by the REIT industry to address this issue.

Adjusted Funds From Operations - AFFO

Our Normalized AFFO per diluted common share for the year ended December 31, 2020 increased $0.19 or 3.7% over the same period in 2019 due primarily to the impact of new investments completed since December 2019, partially offset by the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition to the adjustments included in the calculation of normalized FFO, normalized AFFO excludes the impact of any straight-line rent revenue, amortization of the original issue discount on our convertible senior notes and amortization of debt issuance costs.

Normalized AFFO is an important supplemental measure of operating performance for a REIT. GAAP requires a lessor to recognize contractual lease payments into income on a straight-line basis over the expected term of the lease. This straight-line adjustment has the effect of reporting lease income that is significantly more or less than the contractual cash flows received pursuant to the terms of the lease agreement. GAAP also requires the original issue discount of our convertible senior notes and debt issuance costs to be amortized as non-cash adjustments to earnings. We also adjust Normalized AFFO for the net change

53

Table of Contents

in our allowance for expected credit losses as well as certain non-cash items related to our equity method investment such as straight-line lease expense and amortization of purchase accounting adjustments. Normalized AFFO is useful to our investors as it reflects the growth inherent in the contractual lease payments of our real estate portfolio.

Funds Available for Distribution - FAD

Our Normalized FAD for the year ended December 31, 2020 increased $13,213,000 or 5.8% over the same period in 2019 due primarily to the impact of new investments completed since December 2019, partially offset by the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition to the adjustments included in the calculation of Normalized AFFO, Normalized FAD excludes the impact of non-cash stock based compensation as well as certain non-cash items related to our equity method investment. Normalized FAD is an important supplemental measure of liquidity for a REIT as a useful indicator of the ability to distribute dividends to stockholders.

The following table reconciles net income, the most directly comparable GAAP metric, to FFO, Normalized FFO, Normalized AFFO and Normalized FAD and is presented for both basic and diluted weighted average common shares ($ in thousands, except share and per share amounts):

Years ended December 31,

Elimination of certain non-cash items in net income:

Depreciation related to noncontrolling interests (777) (52) —

Gain on sale of real estate (21,316) — —

Impairment of real estate — 2,500 —

Non-cash write-off of straight-line rent receivable 380 — 3,701

Note receivable impairment — — 363

Recognition of unamortized note receivable commitment fees — — (515)

Straight-line lease revenue, net, related to noncontrolling interests 111 13 —

Amortization of original issue discount 303 761 788

Equity method investment adjustments, net 1,374 — —

Note receivable credit loss expense 991 — —

Equity method investment capital expenditure (420) — —

Equity method investment non-refundable fees received 660 — —

BASIC

NAREIT FFO attributable to common stockholders per share $ 5.51 $ 5.52 $ 5.38

DILUTED

NAREIT FFO attributable to common stockholders per share $ 5.51 $ 5.49 $ 5.36

54

Table of Contents

Adjusted EBITDA

We consider Adjusted EBITDA to be an important supplemental measure because it provides information which we use to evaluate our performance and serves as an indication of our ability to service debt. We define Adjusted EBITDA as consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, excluding real estate asset impairments and gains on dispositions and certain items which, due to their infrequent or unpredictable nature, may create some difficulty in comparing Adjusted EBITDA for the current period to similar prior periods. These items include, but are not limited to, impairment of non-real estate assets, gains and losses attributable to the acquisition and disposition of assets and liabilities, and recoveries of previous write-downs. Adjusted EBITDA also includes our proportionate share of unconsolidated equity method investments presented on a similar basis. Since others may not use our definition of Adjusted EBITDA, caution should be exercised when comparing our Adjusted EBITDA to that of other companies. EBITDA reflects GAAP interest expense, which excludes amounts capitalized during the period.

The following table reconciles net income, the most directly comparable GAAP metric, to Adjusted EBITDA ($ in thousands):

Years ended December 31,

NHI’s share of EBITDA adjustments for unconsolidated entities 1,495 — —

Gain on sale of real estate (21,316) — —

Impairment of real estate — 2,500 —

Non-cash write-off of straight-line rent receivable 380 — 3,701

Note receivable credit loss expense 991 — —

Note receivable impairment — — 363

Recognition of unamortized note receivable commitment fees — — (515)

Fixed Charge Coverage 6.0x 5.4x 6.0x

For all periods presented, EBITDA reflects GAAP interest expense, which excludes amounts capitalized during the period.

55

Table of Contents

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Interest Rate Risk

At December 31, 2020, we were exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on approximately $548,000,000 of variable-rate indebtedness (excludes $400,000,000 of variable-rate debt that has been hedged through interest-rate swap contracts) and on our mortgage and other notes receivable. The unused portion ($252,000,000 at December 31, 2020) of our revolving credit facility, should it be drawn upon, is subject to variable rates.

Interest rate fluctuations will generally not affect our future earnings or cash flows on our fixed rate debt and loans receivable unless such instruments mature or are otherwise terminated. However, interest rate changes will affect the fair value of our fixed rate instruments. Conversely, changes in interest rates on variable rate debt and investments would change our future earnings and cash flows, but not significantly affect the fair value of those instruments. Assuming a 50 basis-point increase or decrease in the interest rate related to variable-rate debt, and assuming no change in the outstanding balance as of December 31, 2020, net interest expense would increase or decrease annually by approximately $2,740,000 or $0.06 per common share on a diluted basis.

We use derivative financial instruments in the normal course of business to mitigate interest rate risk. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. Derivatives are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at their fair value. We may engage in hedging strategies to manage our exposure to market risks in the future, depending on an analysis of the interest rate environment and the costs and risks of such strategies.

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our debt ($ in thousands):

Balance1 % of total Rate3 Balance1 % of total Rate3

Fixed rate:

Variable rate:

1 Differs from carrying amount due to unamortized discounts and loan costs.

3 Total is weighted average rate

The unsecured bank term loans and $60,000,000 of the revolving credit facility in the table above reflect the effect of $400,000,000 notional amount interest rate swaps which mature in December 2021, that effectively convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. These loans bear interest at LIBOR plus a spread, currently a blended 157 basis points, based on our leverage-based LIBOR margin.

56

Table of Contents

To highlight the sensitivity of our convertible senior notes and secured mortgage debt to changes in interest rates, the following summary shows the effects on fair value (“FV”) assuming a parallel shift of 50 basis points (“bps”) in market interest rates for a contract with similar maturities as of December 31, 2020 ($ in thousands):

Balance Fair Value1 FV reflecting change in interest rates

Fixed rate: -50 bps +50 bps

At December 31, 2020, the fair value of our mortgage and other notes receivable, discounted for estimated changes in the risk-free rate, was approximately $321,021,000. A 50 basis-point increase in market rates would decrease the estimated fair value of our mortgage and other loans by approximately $1,480,000, while a 50 basis-point decrease in such rates would increase their estimated fair value by approximately $13,007,000.

Equity Price Risk

The Company is not subject to equity risk since it owns no marketable securities.

Common Stock Price Volatility

Our compensation committee has historically granted stock incentive awards to employees in the form of stock options. Compensation expense is recognized for stock options over the requisite service period using the fair value of these grants as estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model and the market value of our publicly traded common stock on the date of grant. This expense is reflected in the “General and administrative” expense line item in our consolidated statements of income. In addition to the market value of our common stock, one of the inputs into this model that significantly impacts the fair value of the options is the expected volatility of our common stock over the estimated life of the option. We estimate expected volatility by using the most recent historical experience.

Since the COVID-19 pandemic began in March 2020, our common stock has experienced periods of elevated volatility in its trading. Any grants of stock options in 2021 will include an increase in expected volatility in the estimation of fair value of stock options that would result in a higher fair value and related stock-based compensation expense for these awards when compared to prior years.

Source: SEC EDGAR (public domain) · 10-K for the period ended 2020-12-31, filed 2021-02-22 · accession 0000877860-21-000015

Filing HTML rendered to line-structured narrative text by the shipped reducer (datafeeds.edgar_fulltext.visible_text, keep_table_headers=True): scripts and inline-XBRL headers are dropped, and table content is reduced to its short label cells — numeric table data is not rendered and is therefore not counted. The same rendering is used for every year, so a year-over-year comparison is like for like.

The text is our rendering of the filing, not a facsimile: original pagination, typography and tables are not reproduced, and the numbers live in the financial statements (FA).

The outline locates item HEADINGS in this document. Only Items 1A and 7 have certified boundaries elsewhere in the terminal (the redline and the narrative-overlap number); every span here runs from one heading found to the next heading found.

How the outline was chosen. It is the longest chain of item headings that runs forward through both the document and the standard item order: 21 headings are on that chain and 15 further heading-shaped lines are not — the table-of-contents echo of every item, cross-references and exhibit-list mentions. Each entry's length is measured from its heading to the next heading on the chain.