Item 1A. Risk Factors
An investment in our Common Stock involves a substantial risk of loss. Set forth below is a summary of the risks and uncertainties affecting our business that we currently believe to be material. We caution you to read the following risk factors, which have affected, and/or in the future could affect, our business, prospects, operating results, and financial condition. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also affect our business, prospects, operating results, and financial condition. Additional risks and uncertainties are described under other captions in this report and should also be considered by our stockholders. If any of these risks materialize, our business, financial condition or operating results could suffer. In this case, the trading price of our Common Stock could decline, and you may lose part or all of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
If we do not successfully execute our priorities, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Our priorities in our Wound & Surgical business are to address large, underpenetrated market opportunities, domestically and internationally, including by launching new organic or inorganic products. We intend to implement and maintain rigorous quality standards throughout our entire supply chain and continue to advance the scientific body of evidence substantiating clinical efficacy, economic viability and the underlying mechanism of action for our PURION processed placental tissue platform through additional peer-reviewed publications, rigorous scientific research and clinical studies.
We have sought and may continue to seek capital to implement our priorities. In developing our priorities, we evaluated many factors including, without limitation, those related to developments in our industry, customer demand, competition, regulatory developments, and general economic conditions. Actual conditions may be different from our assumptions, and we may not be able to successfully execute our priorities. If we do not successfully execute our priorities, or if actual results vary significantly from our assumptions, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely impacted.
We are in a highly competitive and evolving field and face competition from well-established tissue processors and medical device manufacturers, as well as new market entrants.
Our business is in a very competitive and evolving field. Competition from other tissue processors, medical device companies, and biotherapeutic companies, and from research and academic institutions, is intense, expected to increase and subject to rapid change and could be significantly affected by new product introductions as well as changes in reimbursement that could favor certain products and competitors over others. Established competitors and newer market entrants are investing in additional clinical research that may allow them to gain further clinician usage, adoption and payer coverage of their products. In addition, consolidation and cost containment measures in the healthcare industry may cause hospitals to consolidate their purchases with suppliers that have a broad portfolio of products. This would continue to give rise to demands for price concessions, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Further, competitors may introduce placental-based membrane products in the future at lower prices, adding new features or gaining additional reimbursement coverage, or utilize sales and marketing practices that negatively impact the industry. Further, they may copy our products outside the United States. The presence of this competition may lead to pricing pressure, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Rapid technological change could cause our products to become obsolete and, if we do not enhance our product offerings through our research and development efforts or business development and inorganic activities, we may be unable to compete effectively.
The technologies underlying our products are subject to rapid technological change. Competition intensifies as technical advances in each field are made and become more widely known. Others may develop services, products or processes with significant advantages over the products, services and processes that we offer or are seeking to develop. Any such occurrence could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We plan to enhance and broaden our product offerings as part of a strategy that involves responding to changing customer demands and competitive pressure and technologies, among other factors. The success of any new product offering or enhancement to an existing product will depend on numerous factors, including our ability to:
•properly identify and anticipate physician and patient needs;
•acquire, through licensing, co-development or outright purchase, new technology developed outside of MIMEDX;
•develop and introduce new products or product enhancements in a timely manner;
•adequately protect our intellectual property and avoid infringing upon the intellectual property rights of third parties;
•demonstrate the safety and efficacy of new products; and
•obtain the necessary regulatory clearances or approvals for new products or product enhancements.
21
If we do not develop and, when necessary, obtain regulatory clearance or approval for new products or product enhancements in time to meet market demand, or if there is insufficient demand for these products or enhancements, our results of operations and financial condition will suffer. Our research and development efforts may require a substantial investment of time and resources, including additional capital, before we are adequately able to determine the commercial viability of a new product, technology, material or other innovation. In addition, even if we are able to successfully develop enhancements or new generations of our products, these enhancements or new generations of products may not produce sales in excess of the costs of development, or they may never receive required regulatory approval and they may be quickly rendered obsolete by changing customer preferences or the introduction by our competitors of products embodying new technologies or features.
Many of our products depend on the availability of tissue from human donors, and any disruption in supply could adversely affect our business.
The success of our human tissue products depends upon, among other factors, the availability of tissue from human donors. Any failure to obtain tissue from our sources will interfere with our ability to effectively meet demand for our products incorporating human tissue. The availability of donated tissue could also be adversely impacted by regulatory changes, public opinion of the donor process and our own reputation in the industry. We may not be successful in our ability to scale tissue recovery efforts to meet the potential future demand of our pipeline. Obtaining adequate supplies of human tissue involves several risks, including limited control over availability (due to for example, access to hospital accounts and the number of consenting mothers), quality, delivery schedules, and eligibility requirements. In addition, any interruption in the supply of any human tissue component could harm our ability to manufacture our products until a new source of supply, if any, could be found. We also utilize third-party providers of placental donations on an as-needed basis to mitigate risks but there can be no assurance that these third parties will be able to provide donated tissues at all times. We may be unable to find a sufficient alternative supply channel in a reasonable time period or on commercially reasonable terms, if at all, which would have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We depend on our senior leadership team and may not be able to retain or replace these employees or recruit additional qualified personnel, which would harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our business and success are materially dependent on attracting and retaining members of our senior leadership team to formulate and execute the Company’s business plans. Since June 2018, we have made significant changes to our senior leadership team, and hired several new senior leaders, including our CEO and CFO in 2023.
Leadership changes can be inherently difficult to manage and may cause material disruption to our business or management team. Changes in senior management could also lead to an environment that presents additional challenges in recruiting and retaining employees, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our future success will also depend, in part, upon our ability to attract and retain skilled personnel, including sales, managerial and technical personnel. There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to find and attract additional qualified employees to support our expected growth or retain any such personnel.
Our revenues depend on adequate reimbursement from public and private insurers and health systems and changes to the ways in which our products are reimbursed in various sites of service could adversely impact our financial results.
Our success depends on the extent to which our customers receive adequate reimbursement for the costs of our products and related treatments from third-party payers, including government healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, as well as private insurers and health systems. Government and other third-party payers attempt to contain healthcare costs by limiting both coverage and the level of reimbursement of medical products, particularly new products. Therefore, significant uncertainty may exist as to the reimbursement status of new healthcare products by third-party payers. Although EPIFIX and EPICORD have coverage with the majority of large payers, a significant number of public and private insurers currently do not cover or reimburse our other products.
The reimbursement landscape for our products varies depending upon the site in which the products are administered. If we are not successful in obtaining adequate coverage and reimbursement for our products from these third-party payers in one or more of the sites of service where our products are used, it could have an adverse effect on market acceptance of our products. Inadequate reimbursement levels would likely also create downward price pressure on our products. Even if we do succeed in obtaining widespread coverage and reimbursement rates or policies for our products, future changes in coverage or reimbursement rates or policies could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Further, we have experienced some reluctance by payers to cover our products under certain circumstances, including for applications other than those for which we have published clinical efficacy data. Since 2022, several wide-ranging proposals have been published for public comment, including relating to payment methodology within the physician office, with potential to change how CMS reimburses for skin substitute products at a national level. At a regional level, three Medicare
22
Administrative Contractors (MACs) signaled their intent to change coverage guidance by moving Local Coverage Determinations (LCDs) through the process. While these were ultimately withdrawn, the same MACs signaled their intent to revisit the issue. If the national reimbursement proposals were to be adopted, it would significantly change Medicare policies governing the reimbursement of skin substitute products principally when used for wound treatment in the private physician office setting. If MACs proceed to change coverage policies, this could significantly change guidance within the affected regions.
Changes in the coverage and reimbursement environment as described above could result in declines in our revenue that would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operation.
Our revenue, results of operations and cash flows may suffer upon the loss of a Group Purchasing Organization or Integrated Delivery Network.
As with many manufacturers in the healthcare space, the Company contracts with Group Purchasing Organizations (“GPOs”) and Integrated Delivery Networks (“IDNs”) to establish contracted pricing and terms and conditions for the members of GPOs and IDNs. Approximately 79% of our sales in the year ended December 31, 2023 came from customers that are members of our primary GPOs or IDNs.
Our agreements with GPOs and IDNs allow us to sell our products efficiently to large groups of customers. Our agreements with GPOs and IDNs typically provide their members with favorable ordering terms and conditions and access to favorable product pricing. These customers purchase our product through GPO and IDN arrangements in part because of the favorable pricing and terms and conditions. If our agreement with any GPO or IDN is terminated or expires without being extended, renewed or renegotiated, this could adversely affect our revenue, results of operations and cash flows.
We contract with and are dependent upon independent sales agents and distributors.
In 2023, approximately 24% of our sales were through our relationships with independent agents, and we also use a small number of distributors, primarily outside the United States, and may use more in the future.Sales agents act directly on behalf of MIMEDX to arrange sales, while distributors take title to product and may set their own prices.
If our relationships with our independent sales agents were terminated for any reason, it could materially and adversely affect our revenues and profits. Because the independent agent often controls the customer relationships within its territory, there is a risk that if our relationship with the agent ends, our relationship with the customer will be lost.
Because our agents and distributors are not employees, there is a risk we will be unable to ensure that our sales processes, compliance safeguards, and related policies will be adhered to despite our communication and training of agents and distributors regarding these requirements. Furthermore, if we fail to maintain relationships with our key independent agents, or fail to ensure that our independent agents adhere to our sales processes, compliance safeguards and related policies, there could be an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
We may obtain the assistance of additional distributors and independent sales representatives to sell products in certain sales channels, particularly in territories and fields where agents are commonly used. Our success is partially dependent upon our ability to train, retain and motivate our independent sales agencies, distributors, and their representatives to appropriately and compliantly sell our products in certain territories or fields. They may not be successful in implementing our marketing plans or compliance safeguards. Some of our independent sales agencies and distributors do not sell our products exclusively and may offer similar products from other companies. Our independent sales agencies and distributors may terminate their contracts with us, may devote insufficient sales efforts to our products or may focus their sales efforts on other products that produce greater commissions for them, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We also may not be able to find additional independent sales agencies and distributors who will agree to appropriately and compliantly market or distribute our products on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. If we are unable to establish new independent sales representative and distribution relationships or renew current sales agency and distribution agreements on commercially acceptable terms, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Disruption of our processing facilities could adversely affect our business, financialcondition and results of operations.
Our business depends upon the continued operation of our processing facilities in Marietta, Georgia and Kennesaw, Georgia. Risks that could impact our ability to use these facilities include the occurrence of natural and other disasters, the outbreak of pandemics, and the need to comply with the requirements of directives from government agencies, including the FDA. Either of our two processing facilities can serve as a redundant processing facility for most of our products in the event the other facility experiences a disaster event. However, if our processing facilities were to become unavailable, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations during the period of such unavailability.
23
To be commercially successful, we must educate physicians, where appropriate, how and when our products areproper alternatives to existing treatments and that ourproducts should be used in their procedures.
We believe physicians will only use our products if they determine, based on their independent medical judgment and experience, clinical data, and published peer reviewed journal articles, that the use of our products in a particular procedure is a favorable alternative to other treatments. Physicians may be hesitant to change their existing medical treatment practices for the following reasons, among others:
•their lack of experience with advanced therapeutics, such as our placenta-based allografts;
•lack of evidence supporting additional patient benefits of advanced therapeutics, such as our placenta-based allografts, over conventional methods in certain therapeutic applications;
•perceived liability risks generally associated with the use of new products and procedures;
•limited availability of reimbursement from third-party payers;
•more favorable reimbursement for other market-available products; and
•the time that must be dedicated to physician training in the use of our products.
If we cannot successfully address quality issues that may arise with our products, our brand reputation could suffer, and our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely impacted.
In the course of conducting our business, we must adequately address quality issues that may arise with our products, as well as defects in third-party components included in our products, as any quality issues or defects may negatively impact physician use of our products. Although we have established internal procedures to minimize risks that may arise from quality issues, we may not be able to eliminate or mitigate occurrences of these issues and associated liabilities. If the quality of our products does not meet the expectations of physicians or patients, then our brand reputation could suffer and our business could be adversely impacted. We must also ensure any promotional claims made for our products comport with government regulations.
The formation of physician-owned distributorships (“PODs”) could result in increased pricing pressure on our products or harm our ability to sell our products to physicians who own or are affiliated with those distributorships.
PODs are medical product distributors that are owned, directly or indirectly, by physicians. These physicians derive a proportion of their revenue from selling or arranging for the sale of medical products for use in procedures they perform on their own patients at hospitals that agree to purchase from or through the POD, or that otherwise furnish ordering physicians with income that is based directly or indirectly on those orders of medical products. The Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) of the Department of Health & Human Services has issued a Special Fraud Alert on PODs, indicating that they are inherently suspect under the federal Anti-Kickback Statute.
Our commercial strategy emphasizes selling directly to healthcare providers and, to a limited extent, through distributors. To our knowledge, we do not directly sell to or distribute any of our products through PODs. The number and strength of PODs in the industry may continue to grow as economic pressures increase throughout the industry and hospitals, insurers and physicians search for ways to reduce costs, and, in the case of the physicians, identify additional sources to increase their incomes. These companies and the physicians who own, or partially own, PODs may have significant market knowledge, access to and influence on the physicians who use our products and the hospitals that purchase our products, and we may not be able to compete effectively for business from physicians who own PODs.
We face the risk of product liability claims and may not be able toobtain or maintain adequate product liability insurance.
While we have had a low product complaint and adverse event rate historically, our business exposes us to the risk of product liability claims that are inherent in the manufacturing, processing and marketing of human tissue products. We may be subject to such claims if our products cause, or appear to have caused, an injury. Claims may be made by patients, healthcare providers or others selling our products. Product liability claims can be expensive to defend (regardless of merit), divert our management’s attention, result in substantial damage awards against us, harm our reputation, and generate adverse publicity, which could result in the withdrawal of, or reduced acceptance of, our products in the market.
Although we have product liability insurance that we believe is adequate, this insurance is subject to deductibles and coverage limitations, and we may not be able to maintain this insurance at an acceptable cost or on acceptable terms or be able to secure increased coverage (if needed), nor can we be sure that existing or future claims against us will be covered by our product liability insurance. Moreover, the existing coverage of our insurance or any rights of indemnification and contribution that we
24
may have may not be sufficient to offset existing or future claims. If we are unable to maintain product liability insurance at an acceptable cost or on acceptable terms with adequate coverage or otherwise protect ourselves against potential product liability claims or we underestimate the amount of insurance we need, we could be exposed to significant liabilities, which may harm our business. A product liability claim or other claim with respect to uninsured liabilities or for amounts in excess of insured liabilities could result in significant costs and significant harm to our business. Even if a claim is not successful, defending such claim would be time-consuming and expensive, may damage our reputation in the marketplace, and would likely divert our management’s attention.
The products we process are derived from human tissue and therefore have the potential for disease transmission.
The utilization of human tissue creates the potential for transmission of communicable disease, including, without limitation, human immunodeficiency virus, viral hepatitis, syphilis and other viral, fungal or bacterial pathogens. We are required to comply with federal and state regulations intended to prevent communicable disease transmission.
We maintain strict quality controls designed in accordance with CGTP to ensure the safe procurement and processing of our tissue, including terminal sterilization of our products. These controls are intended to prevent the transmission of communicable disease. However, risks exist with any human tissue implantation. Also, negative publicity concerning disease transmission from other companies’ improperly processed donated tissue could have a negative impact on the demand for our products and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may implement a product recall or voluntary market withdrawal, which could significantly increase our costs, damage our reputation, disrupt our business and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The processing and marketing of our tissue products involves an inherent risk that our tissue products or processes may not meet applicable quality standards and requirements. In the event that one or more of our products experiences a failure to meet such standards and requirements, we may voluntarily implement a recall or market withdrawal or may be required to do so by a regulatory authority.
A recall or market withdrawal of one of our products could be costly and may divert management resources. A recall or withdrawal of one of our products, or a similar product processed by another entity, also could impair sales of our products as a result of confusion concerning the scope of the recall or withdrawal, or as a result of the damage to our reputation for quality and safety.
A cyberattack or significant disruptions of our information technology systems could adversely affect our business, results of operation and financial condition.
A cyberattack, a disruption in availability, or the unauthorized alteration of systems or data could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. We rely on technology for day-to-day operations as well as positioning to enhance our stance in the market. We generate intellectual property that is central to the future success of the business and transmit large amounts of confidential information. Additionally, we collect, store and transmit confidential information of customers, patients, employees and third parties. We also have outsourced significant elements of our operations to third parties, including significant elements of our information technology infrastructure, and, as a result, we are managing many independent vendor relationships with third parties who may or could have access to our confidential information. The continually changing threat landscape of cybersecurity today makes our systems potentially vulnerable to service interruptions or to security breaches from inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees, partners, and vendors, and from attacks by malicious third parties, including supply chain attacks originating at our third-party partners. Such attacks are of ever-increasing levels of sophistication. Attacks are made by individuals or groups that have varying levels of expertise, some of which are technologically advanced and well-funded including, without limitation, nation states, organized criminal groups and hacktivists organizations.
To ensure protection of our information, we have invested in cybersecurity and have implemented processes and procedural controls to maintain the confidentiality and integrity of such information. We measure these controls and their success through a cybersecurity framework that is based on industry standards. While we have invested in the protection of our data and technology, there can be no guarantees that our efforts will prevent all service interruptions or security breaches. Any such interruption or breach of our systems could adversely affect our business operations and result in the loss of critical or sensitive confidential information or intellectual property, and could result in financial, legal and reputational harm to our business, including legal claims and proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information, government enforcement actions and regulatory penalties, as well as remediation costs. We also maintain cyber liability insurance. However, this insurance may not be sufficient to cover the financial, legal or reputational losses that may result from an interruption or breach of our systems.
25
We may expand or contract our business through acquisitions, divestitures, licenses, investments, and other commercial arrangements with other companies or technologies, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We periodically evaluate opportunities to acquire companies or divest divisions, technologies, products, and rights through licenses, distribution agreements, investments, and outright acquisitions to grow our business. In connection with one or more of those transactions, we may, subject to the requirements and limitations set forth in our Citizens Credit Agreement (as defined below in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”), Liquidity and Capital Resources):
•divest or license existing products or technology;
•use cash that we may need in the future to operate our business;
•incur debt that could have terms unfavorable to us or that we might be unable to repay;
•structure the transaction in a manner that has unfavorable tax consequences, such as a stock purchase that does not permit a step-up in the tax basis for the assets acquired;
•be unable to realize the anticipated benefits, such as increased revenues, cost savings, or synergies from additional sales; and
•be unable to secure the services of key employees related to the transaction(s).
Any of these items could adversely affect our revenues, results of operations and financial condition. Business acquisitions also involve the risk of unknown liabilities associated with the acquired business, which could be material. Incurring unknown liabilities or the failure to realize the anticipated benefits of any transaction could adversely affect our business if we are unable to recover our initial investment. Inability to recover our investment, or any write off of such investment, associated goodwill or assets could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
A portion of our revenues and accounts receivable come from government accounts.
Some of our revenues are derived from sales, both direct and through a distributor, to the government. Any disruption of our products on the FSS or any change in the way the government purchases products like ours or the price it is willing to pay for our products could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
New lines of business or new products and services may subject us to additional risks.
From time to time, we may implement or may acquire new lines of business or offer new products and services within existing lines of business. There are risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, particularly in instances where the markets are not fully developed or are evolving. In developing and marketing new lines of business and new products and services, we may invest significant time and resources. External factors, such as regulatory compliance obligations, competitive alternatives, and shifting market preferences, may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of business or a new product or service. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or new products or services could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our international expansion and operations outside the U.S. expose us to risks associated with international sales and operations.
We are pursuing further expansion outside the U.S., including in Japan. Managing a global organization is difficult, time consuming and expensive. Our ability to conduct international operations is affected by many of the same risks we face in our U.S. operations, as well as unique costs and difficulties of managing international operations, including the relationships and operations of distributors we elect to work with in these markets. Adoption of our products in new geographic regions could take longer and cost more than we anticipate. Risks inherent in international operations also include, among others, potential adverse tax consequences, greater difficulty in enforcing intellectual property rights, risks associated with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and local anti-bribery law compliance, and other international regulations. These regulations may limit our ability to market, sell, distribute or otherwise transfer our products to prohibited countries or persons. International regulations may also limit what promotional claims we may make for our products.
Compliance with these regulations and laws is costly, and failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory obligations could adversely affect us in a variety of ways that include, without limitation, significant criminal, civil and administrative penalties, including imprisonment of individuals, fines and penalties, denial of export privileges, seizure of shipments and restrictions on certain business activities. Also, the failure to comply with applicable legal and regulatory obligations could result in the disruption of our distribution and sales activities.
26
These risks may limit or disrupt our expansion, restrict the movement of funds or result in the deprivation of contractual rights or the taking of property by nationalization or expropriation without fair compensation. Operating outside of the U.S. also requires significant management attention and financial resources.
Risks Related to Regulatory Approval of Our Products and Other GovernmentRegulations
The FDA has in the past determined, and may in the future determine, that certain of our products that are, or are derived from, human cells or tissues, do not qualify for regulation solely under Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (“Section 361”), and may require that we revise our labeling and marketing claims for these products or that we suspend sales of such products until FDA pre-market clearance or approval is obtained, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
The products we manufacture and process are derived from human tissue. Amniotic and other birth tissue have in the past generally been regulated as HCT/P and were therefore eligible to be subject to regulation solely under Section 361 (“Section 361 HCT/P”) depending on whether the specific product at issue and the claims made for it were consistent with the applicable criteria. HCT/Ps that do not meet these criteria are subject to more extensive regulation as drugs, medical devices, biological products, or combination products. These HCT/Ps must comply with both the FDA’s requirements for HCT/Ps and the requirements applicable to biologics, devices or drugs, including pre-market clearance or approval from the FDA. Obtaining FDA pre-market clearance or approval involves significant time and investment by the Company.
In accordance with the FDA Guidance, as discussed above in “Business – Government Regulation,” after May 31, 2021, the Company no longer markets or sells its products that were impacted by enforcement discretion in the United States, has requested the return of unused consignment inventory as of that date, and does not intend to sell such products in the United States until the FDA grants pre-market approval. Our sales of such products for all uses was $0.5 million, $2.4 million, and $17.6 million, respectively, in 2023, 2022, and 2021. Prior to May 31, 2021, these sales were primarily in the United States. The loss of our ability to market and sell our micronized products previously had an adverse impact on our revenues, business, financial condition and results of operations.
Also, we are engaged with the FDA regarding the classification of AXIOFILL and certain of our other products. If the FDA makes a final determination that any of these products do not meet the requirements for regulation solely under Section 361, in order to continue to market the products, we would be required to obtain the appropriate FDA approval or clearance. The loss of our ability to market and sell these products would have an adverse impact on our revenues, business, financial condition and results of operations.
Any future regulatory changes could also have adverse consequences for us and make it more difficult or expensive for us to conduct our business by requiring pre-market clearance or approval and compliance with additional post-market regulatory requirements with respect to those products. For example, the FDA may in the future impose conditions, such as labeling restrictions, and the requirement that a product be manufactured in compliance with CGMP, which would require significant additional time and cost investments by the Company. Moreover, increased regulatory scrutiny within the industry in which we operate could lead to increased regulation of HCT/Ps, including Section 361 HCT/Ps, which could ultimately increase our costs and adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Obtaining and maintaining the necessary regulatory approvals, including conducting clinical trials, for certain of our products or potential products could be expensive and time consuming.
The process of obtaining regulatory clearances or approvals to market a biological product or medical device from the FDA or similar regulatory authorities outside of the U.S. may be costly and time consuming, and such clearances or approvals may not be granted on a timely basis, or at all. The FDA may take the position that some of the products that we currently market require a BLA. Some of the future products and enhancements to our current products that we expect to develop or may acquire and market may require marketing clearance or approval from the FDA. However, clearance or approval may not be granted with respect to any of our products or enhancements and further FDA review may add delays that could adversely affect our ability to market such products or enhancements.
The process of obtaining an approved BLA, including clinical trial development and execution as well as manufacturing processes, requires the expenditure of substantial time, effort and financial resources and may take years to complete, including costs incurred on top of those fees incurred as part of conducting various clinical studies. The fee for filing a BLA and program fees payable with respect to any establishment that manufactures biologics are substantial. The FDA may not grant approval on a timely basis, or at all, or we may decide not to pursue a BLA for certain products or indications, or need to conduct additional trials for a given indication. Additionally, the FDA may limit the indications for use or place other conditions on any approvals that could restrict the commercial application of the products. If we do receive approval, some types of changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications or doses, manufacturing changes and additional labeling claims, are subject to further testing requirements and FDA review and approval. Our revenues could be adversely
27
affected if we fail to obtain BLA approvals on a timely basis or at all, or if the FDA limited the indications for use or required other conditions that restrict the commercial application of our products.
Additionally, there are significant costs associated with clinical trials that can be difficult to accurately estimate until a BLA is approved. Clinical trials may not be successful or may return results that do not support approval. Moreover, the results of early clinical trials are not necessarily predictive of future results, and any product we advance into clinical trials may not have favorable results in later clinical trials. Our interpretation of data and results from our clinical trials does not ensure that we will achieve similar results in future clinical trials. In addition, clinical data are often susceptible to various interpretations and analyses, and many companies that have believed their products performed satisfactorily in earlier clinical trials or retrospective studies have nonetheless failed to replicate results in later clinical trials.
Our business is subject to extensive regulation by the FDA and other authorities, which is costly, and our failure to comply could result in negative effects on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
As discussed above, the FDA has specific regulations governing our tissue-based products, or HCT/Ps. The FDA has broad post-market and regulatory and enforcement powers, even for Section 361 HCT/Ps. The FDA’s regulation of HCT/Ps includes requirements for registration and listing of products, donor screening and testing, processing and distribution, labeling, record keeping and adverse-reaction reporting, and inspection and enforcement.
HCT/Ps that are regulated as drugs, biological products or medical devices are subject to even more stringent regulation by the FDA. Even if pre-market clearance or approval is obtained, the approval or clearance may place substantial restrictions on the indications for which the product may be marketed or to whom it may be marketed, may require warnings to accompany the product or impose additional restrictions on the sale or use of the product. In addition, regulatory approval is subject to continuing compliance with regulatory standards, including the FDA’s quality system regulations.
If we fail to comply with the FDA regulations regarding our tissue products, the FDA could take enforcement action, including, without limitation, any of the following sanctions and the manufacture of our products or processing of our tissue could be delayed or terminated:
•untitled letters, warning letters, cease and desist orders, fines, injunctions, and civil penalties;
•recall or seizure of our products;
•operating restrictions, partial suspension or total shutdown of production;
•refusing our requests for clearance or approval of new products;
•withdrawing or suspending current applications for approval or approvals already granted;
•refusal to grant export approval for our products; and
•criminal prosecution.
The FDA’s regulation of HCT/Ps may continue to evolve. Complying with any such new regulatory requirements may entail significant time delays and expense, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The AATB has issued operating standards for tissue banking. Compliance with these standards is a requirement in order to become an accredited tissue bank. In addition, some states have their own tissue banking regulations.
In addition, procurement of certain human organs and tissue for transplantation is subject to the restrictions of the NOTA, which prohibits the transfer of certain human organs, including skin and related tissue for valuable consideration, but permits the reasonable payment associated with the removal, transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control and storage of human tissue and skin. We reimburse tissue banks, hospitals and physicians for their services associated with the recovery and storage of donated human tissue. Although we have independent third-party appraisals that confirm the reasonableness of the service fees we pay, if we were to be found to have violated NOTA’s prohibition on the sale or transfer of human tissue for valuable consideration, we could potentially be subject to criminal enforcement sanctions, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
Finally, we and other manufacturers of skin substitutes are required to provide averageASP information to CMS on a quarterly basis. The Medicare payment rates are updated quarterly based on this ASP information. If a manufacturer is found to have made a misrepresentation in the reporting of ASP, such manufacturer is subject to civil monetary penalties of up to $10,000 for each misrepresentation for each day in which the misrepresentation was applied, and potential False Claims Act liability. See “We and our sales representatives, whether employees or independent contractors, must comply with various federal and state anti-kickback, self-referral, false claims and similar laws, any breach of which could cause an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.”
28
We may be subject to fines, penalties, injunctions and other sanctions if we are deemed to be promoting the use of our products for unapproved, or off-label, uses.
As a general rule, FDA regulations require that the marketing of 361 HCT/Ps only be for appropriate homologous uses, and that the promotion of pre-approved biological products or devices only be for FDA-approved indications. Generally, unless the products are approved by the FDA for alternative uses, the FDA contends that we may not make claims about the safety or effectiveness of our products, or promote them as safe or effective for uses other than those specifically approved by the FDA. Such limitations present a risk that the FDA or other federal or state law enforcement authorities could determine that the nature and scope of our sales, marketing and support activities, though designed to comply with all FDA requirements, constitute the promotion of our products for an unapproved use in violation of the federal FD&C Act. We also face the risk that the FDA or other governmental authorities might pursue enforcement based on past activities that we have discontinued or changed, including sales activities, prior marketing materials, arrangements with institutions and doctors, educational and training programs and other activities.
Investigations concerning the promotion of unapproved product uses and related issues are typically expensive, disruptive and burdensome and generate negative publicity. If our promotional activities are found to be in violation of the law, we may face significant legal action, fines, penalties, and even criminal liability and may be required to substantially change our sales, promotion, grant and educational activities. There is also a possibility that we could be enjoined from selling some or all of our products for any unapproved use. In addition, as a result of an enforcement action against us or any of our executive officers, we could be excluded from participation in government healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid.
However, under the Guidance, as discussed above in “Business – Government Regulation,” after May 31, 2021, the Company no longer markets or sells its products that were impacted by enforcement discretion in the United States, and does not intend to sell such products in the United States until the FDA grants pre-market approval. We will ultimately only be able to market such products for indications that have been cleared or approved by the FDA.
Nevertheless, while we believe we are fully in compliance with the FDA's Guidance on HCT/Ps, there can be no assurance that we have correctly interpreted the FDA Guidance, or that we will not need to discontinue marketing a product and/or may be subject to fines, penalties, injunctions, and other sanctions if we are deemed to be promoting the use of our products for unapproved uses. Such regulatory penalties by the FDA could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We and our sales representatives, whether employees or independent contractors, must comply with various federal and state anti-kickback, self-referral, false claims and similar laws, any breach of which could cause an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our relationships with physicians, hospitals and other healthcare providers are subject to various federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws. Healthcare fraud and abuse laws are complex and, in some instances, even minor or inadvertent violations can give rise to liability. Possible sanctions for violation of the healthcare fraud and abuse laws include, without limitation, monetary fines, civil and criminal penalties, exclusion from participating in the federal and state healthcare programs, including, without limitation, Medicare, Medicaid, the VA health programs and TRICARE (the healthcare program administered by or on behalf of the U.S. Department of Defense for uniformed service members, including both those in active duty and retirees, as well as their dependents), and forfeiture of amounts collected in violation of such prohibitions. Many states have similar fraud and abuse laws, imposing substantial penalties for violations. A finding of a violation of one or more of these laws, or even a government investigation or inquiry into the same, would likely result in a material adverse effect on the market price of our Common Stock, as well as on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
The federal Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”) is a criminal law that prohibits, among other things, any person from knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving remuneration, directly or indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward referrals, purchases or orders or arranging for or recommending the purchase, order or referral of any item or service for which payment may be made in whole or in part by a federal healthcare program, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The term “remuneration” has been broadly interpreted to include anything of value. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the “PPACA”) amended the federal AKS to clarify the intent that is required to prove a violation. Under the federal AKS as amended, a person or entity need not have actual knowledge of this statute or specific intent to violate it. The PPACA also amended the federal AKS to provide that any claims for items or services resulting from a violation of the federal AKS are considered false or fraudulent for purposes of the federal FCA. A conviction for violation of the AKS results in criminal fines and requires mandatory exclusion from participation in federal health care programs. Although there are a number of statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors to the federal AKS that protect certain common industry practices from prosecution, the exceptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly, and arrangements may be subject to scrutiny or penalty if they do not fully satisfy all elements of an available exception or safe harbor. We have entered into consulting agreements, speaker agreements, research agreements and product development agreements with physicians, including some who may order or recommend our products or make decisions to use them. In addition, some of these physicians own our stock, which
29
they purchased in arm’s-length transactions on terms identical to those offered to non-physicians, or received stock awards from us in the past as consideration for services performed by them. While we believe these transactions generally meet the requirements of applicable laws, including the federal AKS and analogous state laws, it is possible that our arrangements with physicians and other providers may be questioned by regulatory or enforcement authorities under such laws, which could lead us to redesign the arrangements and subject us to significant civil or criminal penalties. We have designed our policies and procedures to comply with the federal AKS, FCA, and industry best practices. In addition, we have conducted training sessions on these principles. If, however, regulatory or enforcement authorities were to view these arrangements as non-compliant with applicable laws, there would be risk of government investigations/inquiries or penalties. There is also risk that one or more of our employees or agents will disregard the rules we have established. Because our strategy relies on the involvement of physicians who consult with us on the design of our products, perform clinical research on our behalf or educate other health care professionals about the efficacy and uses of our products, we could be materially impacted if regulatory or enforcement agencies or courts interpret our financial relationships with physicians who refer or order our products to be in violation of applicable laws. This could harm our reputation and the reputations of the physicians we engage to provide services on our behalf. In addition, the cost of noncompliance with these laws could be substantial since we could be subject to monetary fines and civil or criminal penalties, and we could also be excluded from federally-funded healthcare programs, including Medicare, Medicaid, VA and TRICARE.
The FCA imposes civil liability on any person or entity that knowingly submits, or causes the submission of, a false or fraudulent claim to the U.S. government. Damages under the FCA can be significant and consist of the imposition of fines and penalties. The FCA also allows a private individual or entity to sue on behalf of the government to recover civil penalties and treble damages as a whistleblower. FCA liability is potentially significant in the healthcare industry because the statute provides for treble damages and mandatory penalties of between $11,181 and $22,363 per false claim or statement for penalties assessed after January 29, 2018, with respect to violations occurring after November 2, 2015.
Manufacturers can be held liable under the FCA even when they do not submit claims directly to government payers if they are deemed to “cause” the submission of false or fraudulent claims. The PPACA provides that claims tainted by a violation of the federal AKS are false for purposes of the FCA. The DOJ on behalf of the government has previously alleged that the marketing and promotional practices of pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers, including the off-label promotion of products or the payment of prohibited kickbacks to doctors, violated the FCA, resulting in the submission of improper claims to federal and state healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. In certain cases, manufacturers have entered into criminal and civil settlements with the federal government under which they entered into plea agreements, paid substantial monetary amounts and entered into onerous corporate integrity agreements with the government that require, among other things, substantial reporting and remedial actions, as well as oversight and review by an outside entity, an Independent Review Organization (“IRO”), at substantial expense to the Company.
Under the HIPAA criminal federal healthcare fraud statute, it is a crime to knowingly and willfully execute, or attempt to execute, a scheme or artifice to defraud any health care benefit program or to obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises, any of the money or property owned by, or under the custody or control of, any health care benefit program, in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits, items or services.
There are federal and state laws requiring detailed reporting of manufacturer interactions with and payments to healthcare providers, such as the federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (“Sunshine Act”). The Sunshine Act requires, among others, “applicable manufacturers” of drugs, devices, biological products, and medical supplies reimbursed under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program to annually report to CMS information related to payments and other transfers of value provided to “covered recipients.” The term covered recipients includes U.S.-licensed physicians and teaching hospitals, and, for reports submitted on or after January 1, 2022, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified nurse anesthetists, and certified nurse-midwives. There is the risk that CMS or another government agency may take the position that our products are not human cell and tissue products regulated solely under Section 361, and thereby assert that we are currently subject to the Sunshine Act, which could subject us to civil penalties and the administrative burden of having to comply with the law.
There are state law equivalents to the AKS and FCA. There are also so-called state “all-payer” anti-kickback laws which may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payer, including commercial insurers, as well as when no insurer is involved (i.e. cash-pay patients).
The enforcement of all of these laws is uncertain and subject to rapid change. Federal or state regulatory or enforcement authorities may investigate or challenge our current or future activities under these laws. Any investigation or challenge could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Any state or federal regulatory or enforcement review of us, regardless of the outcome, would be costly and time consuming. Additionally, we cannot predict the impact of any changes in these laws, whether these changes are retroactive or will have effect on a going-forward basis only.
30
Our results of operations may be adversely affected by current and potential future healthcare reforms.
In response to perceived increases in healthcare costs in recent years, there have been and continue to be proposals by the U.S. federal government, state governments, regulators and third-party payers to control these costs and, more generally, to reform the U.S. healthcare system. In the U.S., the PPACA was enacted in 2010 with a goal of reducing the cost of healthcare and substantially changing the way healthcare is financed by both government and private insurers.
In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the U.S. since the PPACA was enacted. The Budget Control Act of 2011 created measures for spending reductions by Congress. A Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, tasked with recommending a targeted deficit reduction of at least $1.2 trillion for the years 2013 through 2021, was unable to reach required goals, thereby triggering the legislation’s automatic reduction to several government programs. This included aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year, which went into effect on April 1, 2013. In January 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act was signed into law, which, among other things, further reduced Medicare payments to several provider types, including hospitals.
In addition to the ACA, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (“MACRA”) repealed the Sustainable Growth Rate formula used to calculate Medicare payment updates for physicians providing services to Medicare beneficiaries. In its place, MACRA introduced the Quality Payment Program (“QPP”), which is a value-based program that focuses on quality and outcomes as a metric for physician reimbursement. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services released its final rules for the QPP in October 2016. The QPP, which impacts more than 600,000 physicians and other practice-based clinicians, represents a fundamental change in physician reimbursement, transitioning from a system that solely rewards volume of care to one that also rewards quality and value of care. The rule may have an impact on our revenue in the future. The program’s increased emphasis on quality and cost of care may encourage physicians to merge practices or seek direct employment with hospitals. In addition, the ACA encourages hospitals and physicians to work collaboratively through shared savings programs as well as other bundled payment initiatives. These shifts could lead to a consolidation of hospital providers into larger delivery networks with increased price negotiation strength resulting in downward pressure on our selling prices. Although we believe that we are well positioned to minimize any such impact on our business, our inability to address the consolidation trend could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
There is uncertainty with respect to the impact the U.S. Administration, the executive order, and the attempted legislation may have, if any, and any changes will likely take time to unfold and could have an impact on coverage and reimbursement for healthcare items and services, including our products. We believe that substantial uncertainty remains regarding the net effect of the PPACA, or its repeal and potential replacement, on our business, including uncertainty over how benefit plans purchased on exchanges will cover our products, how the expansion or contraction of the Medicaid program will affect access to our products, the effect of risk-sharing payment models such as Accountable Care Organizations and other value-based purchasing programs on coverage for our product, and the effect of the general increase or decrease in federal oversight of healthcare payers. The taxes imposed and the expansion in government’s role in the U.S. healthcare industry under the PPACA, if unchanged, may result in decreased revenues, lower reimbursements by payers for our products and reduced medical procedure volumes, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We may fail to obtain or maintain foreign regulatory approvals to market our products in other countries.
We currently market our products in a small number of foreign countries, including in Japan. Foreign jurisdictions require separate regulatory approvals and compliance with numerous and varying regulatory requirements. The approval procedures vary among countries and may involve requirements for additional testing. Certain of our products require clearance or approval by the FDA. However, such clearance or approval does not ensure approval or certification by regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions, and approval or certification by one foreign regulatory authority does not ensure approval or certification by regulatory authorities in other foreign countries or by the FDA. The foreign regulatory approval or certification process may include all of the risks associated with obtaining FDA clearance or approval. We may not obtain foreign regulatory approvals on a timely basis, if at all. We may not be able to file for regulatory approvals or certifications and may not receive necessary approvals to commercialize our products in any foreign jurisdiction. Furthermore, many foreign jurisdictions operate under socialized medical care, and obtaining reimbursement for our products under that construct may also prove difficult. If we fail to receive necessary approvals, certifications, or reimbursements necessary to commercialize our products in foreign jurisdictions on a timely basis, or at all, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected. Further, governmental authorities outside the U.S. have become increasingly stringent in their regulation of medical devices, and our products may become subject to more rigorous regulation by non-U.S. governmental authorities in the future. U.S. or non-U.S. government regulations may be imposed in the future that may have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.
31
Federal and state laws that protect the privacy and security of personal information may increase our costs and limit our ability to collect and use that information and subject us to liability if we are unable to fully comply with such laws.
Numerous federal and state laws, rules and regulations govern the collection, dissemination, use, security and confidentiality of personal information, including protected health information and individually identifiable health information. These laws include:
•provisions of HIPAA that limit how covered entities and business associates may use and disclose protected health information, provide certain rights to individuals with respect to that information and impose certain security requirements
•HITECH, which strengthened and expanded the HIPAA Privacy Rule and Security Rules, imposed data breach notification obligations, created new tiers of civil monetary penalties, amended HIPAA to make civil and criminal penalties directly applicable to business associates and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in U.S. federal courts to enforce the federal HIPAA laws and seek attorneys’ fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions;
•other federal and state laws restricting the use and protecting the privacy and security of personal information, including health information, many of which are not preempted by HIPAA;
•federal and state consumer protection laws; and
•federal and state laws regulating the conduct of research with human subjects.
The California Consumer Protection Act (“CCPA”), which became effective on January 1, 2020, is a privacy law that requires certain companies doing business in California to disclose information regarding the collection and use of a consumer’s personal data and to delete a consumer’s data upon request. The Act also permits the imposition of civil penalties and expands existing state security laws by providing a private right of action for consumers in certain circumstances where consumer data is subject to a breach. We are still evaluating whether and how this rule will impact our U.S. operations and/or limit the ways in which we can provide services or use personal data collected while providing services.
As part of our business operations, including our medical record keeping, third-party billing and reimbursement and research and development activities, we collect and maintain protected health information in paper and electronic format. Standards related to collecting and maintaining health information, whether implemented pursuant to HIPAA, HITECH, state laws, federal or state action or otherwise, could have a significant effect on the manner in which we handle personal information, including healthcare-related data, and communicate with payers, providers, patients, donors and others, and compliance with these standards could impose significant costs on us or limit our ability to offer services, thereby negatively impacting the business opportunities available to us.
If we are alleged to have not complied with existing or new laws, rules and regulations related to personal information, we could be subject to litigation and to sanctions that include monetary fines, civil or administrative penalties, civil damage awards or criminal penalties.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property
Our ability to protect our intellectual property and proprietary technologythrough patents and other means is uncertain and may be inadequate, which couldhave an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our success depends significantly on our ability to protect our proprietary rights to the technologies used in our products. We rely on patent protection, as well as a combination of copyright, trade secret and trademark laws and nondisclosure, confidentiality and other contractual restrictions to protect our proprietary technology, including our licensed technology. These legal means afford only limited protection and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep any competitive advantage. In addition, our pending patent applications include claims to material aspects of our products and procedures that may not be protected by issued patents. The patent application process can be time consuming and expensive. Our pending patent applications might not result in issued patents, and issued patents may later be determined to be invalid or unenforceable as a result of district court litigation or related administrative proceedings. Competitors may be able to design around our patents or develop products that provide outcomes that are comparable or even superior to ours. Although we have taken steps to protect our intellectual property and proprietary technology, including entering into confidentiality agreements and intellectual property assignment agreements with some of our officers, employees, consultants and advisors, such agreements may not be enforceable or may not provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets or other proprietary information in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure or other breaches of the agreements.
The failure to obtain and maintain patents or protect our intellectual property rights could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Whether a patent claim is valid is a complex matter of science, facts and law, and therefore we cannot be certain that, if challenged in a court of law, or through an administrative proceeding, our
32
patent claims would be upheld. If any of those patent claims are invalidated or determined to be unenforceable, our competitive advantage may be reduced or eliminated.
In the event a competitor infringes upon our licensed patents, issued patents, pending patent applications or other intellectual property rights, enforcing those rights may be costly, uncertain, difficult and time consuming. Even if successful, litigation to enforce or defend our intellectual property rights could be expensive and time consuming and could divert our management’s attention. Further, bringing litigation to enforce our patents subjects us to the potential for counterclaims. Other companies or entities also have commenced, and may again commence, actions seeking to establish the invalidity of our patents and certain related claims. In the event that any of our patent claims are challenged, a court, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), or the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the USPTO may invalidate one or more challenged patent claims or determine that the patent is unenforceable, which could harm our competitive position. If the USPTO or the PTAB ultimately cancels or narrows the claim scope of any of our patents through these proceedings, it could prevent or hinder us from being able to enforce them against competitors. Such adverse decisions could negatively impact our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Many companies have encountered significant problems in enforcing and defending intellectual property rights in certain foreign jurisdictions. This could make it difficult for us to stop infringement of our foreign patents, if obtained, or the misappropriation of our other intellectual property rights. For example, some foreign countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner must grant licenses to third parties. In addition, some countries limit the enforceability of patents against third parties, including government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, patents may provide limited or no benefit. Patent protection must ultimately be sought on a country-by-country basis, which is an expensive and time-consuming process with uncertain outcomes. Accordingly, we may choose not to seek patent protection in certain countries, and we will not have the benefit of patent protection in such countries. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business. Accordingly, our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights in some countries may be inadequate.
We may become subject to claims of infringement of theintellectual property rights of others, which could prohibit us from developingour products, require us to obtain licenses from third parties or to developnon-infringing alternatives, and subject us to substantial monetary damages.
Third parties could assert that our products infringe one or more claims of their issued patents or other intellectual property rights. Whether a product infringes a patent claim or other intellectual property right involves a complex combination of legal and factual issues, the determination of which is often uncertain. Therefore, we cannot be certain that we have not infringed the intellectual property rights of others. Because patent applications are not immediately published, and may take years to issue, there also may be applications now pending of which we are unaware that may later result in issued patent claims that our products or processes may infringe. There also may be existing patents or pending patent applications of which we are unaware that our products or processes may inadvertently infringe.
Any infringement claim could cause us to incur significant costs, place significant strain on our financial resources, divert management’s attention from our business and harm our reputation. If the relevant patent claims at issue in such a dispute were upheld as valid and enforceable and we were found to infringe, we could be prohibited from selling any product that is found to infringe those claims through an injunction unless we could obtain licenses to use the technology covered by the asserted patent claims or other intellectual property, or are able to design around the patent claim or claims at issue or other intellectual property. We may be unable to obtain such a license on terms acceptable to us, if at all, and we may not be able to redesign our products to avoid infringement. A court could also order us to pay compensatory damages for such infringement, plus prejudgment interest and could, in addition, treble the compensatory damages and award attorney fees. These damages could be substantial and could harm our reputation, business, financial condition and operating results. A court also could enter orders that temporarily, preliminarily or permanently enjoin us and our customers from making, using, or selling products, and could enter an order mandating that we undertake certain remedial measures. Depending on the nature of the relief ordered by the court, we could become liable for additional damages to third parties. Further, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our trade secrets or other confidential information could be compromised by inadvertent or court-ordered disclosure during this type of litigation.
We may be subject to damages resulting from claims that we, our employees, orour independent contractors have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged tradesecrets, proprietary or confidential information of our competitors or are in breach of non-competition or non-solicitation agreements with our competitors.
Some of our employees were previously employed at other medical device, pharmaceutical or tissue companies. We may also hire additional employees who are currently employed at other medical device, pharmaceutical or tissue companies, including our competitors. Additionally, consultants or other independent agents with which we may contract may be or have been in a
33
contractual arrangement with one or more of our competitors. Although no claims are currently pending, we may be subject to claims that we, our employees, or our independent contractors have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of these former employers or competitors. In addition, we have been and may in the future be subject to claims that we caused an employee to breach the terms of his or her non-competition or non-solicitation agreement. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management. If we fail to defend such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel. Any future litigation or the threat thereof may adversely affect our ability to hire additional direct sales representatives. A loss of key personnel or their work product could hamper or prevent our ability to market existing or new products, which could severely harm our business, financial condition and operating results.
Risks Related to Our Consolidated Financial Statements, Internal Controls and Related Matters
If we fail to maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting in the future, this could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
We have in the past reported material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting which we have since remediated. If material weaknesses or deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting are discovered or occur in the future, our consolidated financial statements might contain material misstatements and we could be required to restate our financial results. Moreover, because of the inherent limitations of any control system, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis, or at all. If we are unable to provide reliable and timely financial reports in the future, our business and reputation may be further harmed. Failures in internal controls may also cause us to fail to meet reporting obligations, negatively affect investor confidence in our management and the accuracy of our financial statements and disclosures, or result in adverse publicity and concerns from investors, any of which could have a negative effect on the price of our Common Stock, subject us to regulatory investigations and penalties or shareholder litigation, and adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Risks Related to the Securities Markets and Ownership of Our Common Stock
Our indebtedness may adversely affect our financial health.
As of January 2024, the Company had aggregate borrowings outstanding of $30.0 million under its Revolving Credit Facility and $20.0 million under its Term Loan Facility, all pursuant to its Citizens Credit Agreement (as defined below in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations). Our outstanding debt may limit our ability to borrow additional funds or may adversely affect the terms on which such additional funds may be available. Additionally, a default under certain other indebtedness constitutes an event of default under the Citizens Credit Agreement. Consequently, the effects of a default under other debt may be amplified by the lenders exercising the remedies available to it in the Citizens Credit Agreement for events of default, including foreclosure on the collateral securing our obligations and the declaration that all amounts outstanding under the Citizens Credit Agreement are immediately due and payable.
The restrictive covenants in the Citizens Credit Agreement, and the Company’s obligation to make payments under the Citizens Credit Agreement, limit our operating and financial flexibility and may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The Citizens Credit Agreement imposes operating and financial restrictions and covenants. The Company must comply with certain financial covenants, including, a maximum total net leverage ratio and a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio. Additionally, the Citizens Credit Agreement includes certain customary restrictive covenants, including, but not limited to, limitations on indebtedness, liens, fundamental changes, dispositions, investments, loans, advances, guarantees, acquisitions, dividends and other restricted payments, transactions with affiliates, swap transactions, sale and leaseback transactions, prepayments on subordinated debt, and amendments to organizational and other material agreements.
The Citizens Credit Agreement also contains certain customary events of default, including, without limitation, (i) failure to pay interest or principal when due, (i) failure to provide notice of certain material events and (iii) failure to perform or observe certain covenants under the Citizens Credit Agreement or any related loan documents (subject to a 30-day grace period in certain circumstances). If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the agent under the agreement may, and at the direction of the lenders, take one or more of the following actions: (i) terminate the commitments, (ii) declare any amounts outstanding immediately due and payable, and (iii) exercise any other right it has under the Citizens Credit Agreement or at law. Compliance with such covenants may restrict our operating flexibility, and in the event that we were unable to comply with such covenants, leading to default and acceleration, this could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
34
EW Healthcare Partners and its interests may conflict with those of our other shareholders.
As of December 31, 2023, EW Healthcare Partners and their affiliates owned approximately 19.3% of our Common Stock (calculated on the basis described in Item 12, “Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners And Management” below). Also, for as long as EW Healthcare Partners and its affiliates collectively hold at least (i) 10% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock, EW Healthcare Partners has the right to select two individuals that the Company must include among its nominees to serve on our Board and (ii) 5% (but less than 10%) of the outstanding shares of our outstanding Common Stock, EW Healthcare Partners has the right to select one individual that the Company must include among its nominees to serve on our Board. EW Healthcare Partners designated Martin P. Sutter and William A. Hawkins, III, who continue to serve on our board as directors. The interests of EW Healthcare Partners may conflict with those of our other shareholders, and EW Healthcare Partners may seek to influence, and may be able to influence, us through its director nomination rights and its share ownership.
The price of our Common Stock has been, and will likely continue to be, volatile.
The market price of our Common Stock, like that of the securities of many other healthcare companies that are engaged in research, development, and commercialization, has fluctuated over a wide range, and it is likely that the price of our Common Stock will fluctuate in the future. The market price of our Common Stock could be impacted by a variety of factors, including:
•Fluctuations in stock market prices and trading volumes of similar companies or of the markets generally;
•Our ability to successfully launch, market and earn significant revenue from our products;
•Our ability to obtain additional financing to support our continuing operations;
•Disclosure of the details and results of our clinical trials and our regulatory applications and proceedings;
•Developments in and disclosure or publicity regarding existing or new litigation or contingent liabilities;
•Changes in government regulations or our failure to comply with any such regulations;
•Additions or departures of key personnel;
•Our investments in research and development or other corporate resources;
•Announcements of technological innovations or new commercial products by us or our competitors;
•Developments in the patents or other proprietary rights owned or licensed by us or our competitors;
•The timing of new product introductions;
•Actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results, including as a result of seasonality in our business, as well as any restatements of previously reported results;
•Our ability to effectively and consistently process or manufacture our products and avoid costs associated with the recall of defective or potentially defective products;
•Our ability and the ability of our distribution partners to market and sell our products;
•Changes in reimbursement for our products or the price for our products to our customers;
•Removal of our products from the FSS, or changes in how government accounts purchase products such as ours or in the price for our products to government accounts;
•Activities of market participants and investors, including analysts and MIMEDX shareholders;
•Material amounts of short-selling of our Common Stock; and
•The other risks detailed in this Item 1A.
Any unanticipated shortfall in our revenue in any fiscal quarter could have an adverse effect on our results of operations in that quarter. The effect on our net income of such a shortfall could be exacerbated by the relatively fixed nature of most of our costs, which primarily include personnel costs as well as facilities costs. These fluctuations could cause the trading price of our stock to be negatively affected. Our quarterly operating results have varied substantially in the past and may vary substantially in the future, including as a result of seasonality in our business. Price volatility or a decrease in the market price of our Common Stock could have an adverse effect on our ability to raise capital, liquidity, business, financial condition and results of operations.
Securities analysts may elect not to report on our common stock or may issue negative reports that adversely affect the stock price.
If we fail to attract the coverage of securities analysts, or if securities analysts discontinue covering our common stock, the lack of research coverage may adversely affect the actual and potential market price of our common stock. The trading market for our common stock may be affected in part by the research and reports that industry participants, industry analysts or financial analysts publish about our business. If one or more analysts elect to cover us and then downgrade the stock, the stock price would likely decline rapidly. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of us, we could lose visibility in the market, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.
Fluctuations in revenue or results of operations could cause additional volatility in our stock price.
35
Any unanticipated shortfall in our revenue in any fiscal quarter could have an adverse effect on our results of operations in that quarter. The effect on our net income of such a shortfall could be exacerbated by the relatively fixed nature of most of our costs, which primarily include personnel costs as well as facilities costs. These fluctuations could cause the trading price of our stock to be negatively affected. Our quarterly operating results have varied substantially in the past and may vary substantially in the future.
We do not intend to pay cash dividends on our Common Stock.
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our Common Stock. We currently expect to use available funds and any future earnings; in the development, operation and expansion of our business; to repay debt; and, to the extent authorized by our Board, repurchasing our Common Stock. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our Common Stock in the foreseeable future. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our Common Stock will be an investor’s only source of potential gain from our Common Stock for the foreseeable future.
Certain provisions of Florida law and anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents may discourage or prevent a change of control, even if an acquisition would be beneficial to shareholders, which could affect our share price adversely and prevent attempts by shareholders to remove current management.
The Florida Business Corporation Act (the “FBCA”) includes several provisions applicable to the Company that may discourage potential acquirors. Such provisions include provisions that:
•allow directors to take other stakeholders into account in discharging their duties;
•a requirement that certain transactions with a shareholder of 10% or more ownership must be approved by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the other shareholders unless approved by a majority of the disinterested directors or certain fair price requirements are met; and
•voting rights acquired by a shareholder at ownership levels at or above one-fifth, one-third and a majority of voting power are denied unless authorized by the Board prior to such acquisition or by a majority of the other shareholders (excluding interested shares (as defined in the FBCA)).
Additionally, our organizational documents contain provisions:
•authorizing the issuance of blank check preferred stock;
•restricting persons who may call shareholder meetings;
•permitting shareholders to remove directors only “for cause” and only by super-majority vote; and
•providing the Board with the exclusive right to fill vacancies and to fix the number of directors.
These provisions of Florida law and our articles of incorporation and bylaws could negatively affect our share price, prevent attempts by shareholders to remove current management, prohibit or delay mergers or other takeovers or changes of control of the Company and discourage attempts by other companies to acquire us, even if such a transaction would be beneficial to our shareholders.
36
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
There are no unresolved SEC Staff comments with respect to our SEC filings.
Item 1C. Cybersecurity
We face significant and persistent cybersecurity risks due primarily to: the substantial level of harm that could occur to us and our customers were we to suffer impacts of a material cybersecurity incident; and our use of third-party products, services and components. We are committed to maintaining robust governance and oversight of these risks and to implementing mechanisms, controls, technologies, and processes designed to help us assess, identify, and manage these risks. While we have not, as of the date of this Annual Report, experienced a cybersecurity threat or incident that resulted in a material adverse impact to our business or operations, there can be no guarantee that we will not experience such an incident in the future. In addition, these threats are constantly evolving, thereby increasing the difficulty of successfully defending against them or implementing adequate preventative measures. We seek to detect and investigate unauthorized attempts and attacks against our network, products, and services, and to prevent their occurrence and recurrence where practicable through changes or updates to our internal processes and tools and changes or updates to our products and services; however, we remain potentially vulnerable to known or unknown threats.
We aim to incorporate industry best practices throughout our cybersecurity program. Our cybersecurity strategy focuses on implementing effective and efficient controls, technologies, and other processes to assess, identify, and manage material cybersecurity risks. Our cybersecurity program is designed to be aligned with applicable industry standards and is assessed periodically by independent third-parties. We have processes in place to assess, identify, manage, and address material cybersecurity threats and incidents. These include, among other things: annual and ongoing security awareness training for employees; mechanisms to detect and monitor unusual network activity; and containment and incident response tools. We monitor issues that are internally discovered or externally reported that may affect our business, and have processes to assess those issues for potential cybersecurity impact or risk. We also have a process in place to manage cybersecurity risks associated with third-party service providers. We impose security requirements upon our suppliers, including: maintaining an effective security management program and abiding by information handling and asset management requirements. Our Board of Directors has ultimate oversight of cybersecurity risk, which it manages as part of our enterprise risk management program. That program is utilized in making decisions with respect to company priorities, resource allocations, and oversight structures. The Board of Directors is assisted by the Audit Committee, which regularly reviews our cybersecurity program with management and reports to the Board of Directors. Cybersecurity reviews by the Audit Committee or the Board of Directors generally occur at least annually, or more frequently as determined to be necessary or advisable. Our cybersecurity program is run by the head of our information security department, who reports to our Chief Financial Officer. Our Chief Financial Officer is informed about and monitors prevention, detection, mitigation, and remediation efforts through regular communication and reporting from professionals in the information security team, who hold cybersecurity certifications such as a Certified Information Systems Security Professional, and through the use of technological tools and software and results from third party audits. We have an escalation process in place to inform senior management and the Board of Directors of material issues.
Item 2. Properties
Our corporate headquarters are located in Marietta, Georgia, where we lease office, laboratory, tissue processing and warehouse space. We also lease a facility in Kennesaw, Georgia, which primarily consists of laboratory, tissue processing and warehouse space. Our properties are used for the design, manufacture and marketing of Wound & Surgical product portfolio. We believe that such properties are suitable and adequate to meet the needs of our business.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
The description of the Welker v. MiMedx, et. al. case contained in Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies to our financial statements included in Item 8 is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
PART II
37
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market for Common Stock
Our Common Stock trades on The Nasdaq Stock Market under the trading symbol “MDXG”.
Holders
Based upon information supplied from our transfer agent, there were approximately 810 shareholders of record of our Common Stock as of February 23, 2024.
Dividends
We have not paid any dividends since our inception and do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends on our Common Stock in the foreseeable future. Payment of future dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on many factors, including general economic and business conditions, our strategic plans, our financial results and condition, legal requirements and other factors as our Board deems relevant.
Stock Performance Graph
The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our Common Stock with the cumulative total stockholder return of the Nasdaq Composite Index and the Russell 2000 Index, for the five year period that commenced on December 31, 2018 and ended December 31, 2023, assuming an investment of $100.00 on December 31, 2018.
ASSUMES $100 INVESTED ON DEC. 31, 2018
ASSUMES DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT; NO DIVIDENDS ISSUED BY MIMEDX
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DEC. 31, 2023
38
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
Information about securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans is incorporated herein by reference to Item 12 of Part III of this Annual Report.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
On December 22, 2023, all 95,000 outstanding shares of the Company’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock”), together with accrued dividends, were mandatorily converted into shares of the Company’s Common Stock in accordance with the Preferred Stock terms set forth in the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended. The Preferred Stock conversion, triggered by the Company’s increased Common Stock share price and following the third anniversary of the Preferred Stock financing transaction in July of 2020. As a result of this conversion, 29,761,650 new shares of Common Stock were issued by the Company to an affiliate of EW Healthcare Partners and to certain funds managed by Hayfin Capital Management LLP. The Company received no consideration upon the conversion. The shares of Common Stock issued pursuant to the conversion of the Preferred Stock were issued in reliance upon exemptions pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and pursuant to applicable state securities laws and regulations, in that the shares of Common Stock were issued by the Company to its existing security holders and no commission or other remuneration was paid or given directly or indirectly for soliciting such exchange.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
There were no purchases of our Common Stock made by or on behalf of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2023.
39
Item 6. [Reserved]
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Executive Summary
During 2023, the Company delivered 20.0% growth in net sales, with broad-based contributions by customer type. This growth was driven by a combination of commercial execution, favorable end market demand and contributions from newer products to our portfolio. Operating and financial highlights during the year include:
•Fourth quarter and full year 2023 net sales of $86.8 million and $321.5 million, respectively, reflecting 16.7% and 20.0% growth over the fourth quarter and full year 2022, respectively.
•Net income from continuing operations for the fourth quarter and full year 2023 of $51.3 million and $67.4 million, respectively.
•Announced strategic realignment of the Company, increasing focus on Wound & Surgical business and significantly improving profitability; disbanded the Regenerative Medicine business unit and suspended knee osteoarthritis clinical trial program.
•Launched EPIEFFECT, the latest addition to the Company’s broad portfolio of Advanced Wound Care products.
•Announced conversion of outstanding Series B convertible preferred stock to common stock.
•Appointed new members to the Company’s Executive Leadership Team, including a new CEO, CFO and Chief Operating Officer.
Overview
MIMEDX is a pioneer and leader in placental biologics focused on delivering innovative solutions to patients and the healthcare professionals who treat them. With more than a decade of experience helping clinicians manage acute and chronic wounds, MIMEDX has been dedicated to providing a leading portfolio of products for applications in the wound care, burn, and surgical sectors of healthcare. All of our products sold in the United States are regulated by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (“FDA”). We apply Current Good Tissue Practices (“CGTP”) and other applicable quality standards in addition to terminal sterilization to produce our allografts.
Our Products
Our product portfolio is divided into two categories (1) Wound Care Products and (2) Surgical and Other Products.
Our Wound Care Products include EPIFIX, EPICORD and EPIEFFECT, which are all marketed for external use, such as in Advanced Wound Care applications. Within Surgical and Other, our product offering includes AMNIOFIX, AMNIOCORD and AMNIOEFFECT, which are positioned for use in a variety of applications and surgical settings, including lower extremity repair, plastic surgery, vascular surgery and multiple orthopedic repairs and reconstructions. Our AXIOFILL product has also seen the most uptake by clinicians for surgical applications.
By specific source material, our primary platform technologies include tissue allografts derived from human placental membrane (EPIFIX, AMNIOFIX, EPIEFFECT, and AMNIOEFFECT), tissue allografts derived from human umbilical cord (EPICORD and AMNIOCORD), and a particulate extracellular matrix derived from human placental disc (AXIOFILL).
This discussion, which presents our results for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes. Also, please refer to Part I, Item 1, Business, and Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, which include detailed discussions of various items impacting our business, results of operations and financial condition. We intend for this discussion to provide the reader with information that will assist in understanding our financial statements, the changes in certain key items in those financial statements from period to period and the primary factors that accounted for those changes. We also discuss certain performance metrics that management uses to assess the Company's performance.
Our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2022 (the “2022 Annual Report”) includes a discussion and analysis of our total company financial condition and results of operations for 2022 compared to 2021 in Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Please note that, subsequent to the publication of our 2022 Annual Report, we announced our plan to disband our Regenerative Medicine business unit, the results of which we believe are not material to an understanding of our financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operation, is now classified as discontinued operations. For further details, please see Note 13, Discontinued Operations, to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.
40
Components of and Key Factors Influencing Our Results of Continuing Operations
In assessing the performance of our business, we consider a variety of performance and financial measures. We believe the items discussed below provide insight into the factors that affect these key measures.
Net sales
Our net sales are derived from selling to a wide range of customers, including hospitals, wound care centers and private physician offices that have clinicians using our suite of products to aid in the management of patients with chronic or hard-to-heal wounds. These customers choose products like ours based upon a variety of factors, including clinical efficacy, availability, handling characteristics, and reimbursement coverage and payer sources. Net sales is recognized based on the consideration we expect to receive from the sale at the point in time when control of the goods is transferred to the customer, which generally occurs upon our delivery to a third-party carrier or implantation for consignment arrangements. Net sales consists of the gross selling price of the product, less any discounts, rebates, fees paid to GPOs, and returns.
Cost of goods sold and gross profit
Cost of goods sold includes product testing costs, quality assurance costs, personnel costs, manufacturing costs, raw materials and product costs, depreciation and facility costs associated with our manufacturing and warehouse facilities. Fluctuations in our cost of goods sold correspond with the fluctuations in these costs as well as sales volume.
Gross profit is calculated as net sales less cost of goods sold. Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by net sales. Our gross margin is affected by product and geographic sales mix, realized pricing of our products, the efficiency of our manufacturing operations and the costs of materials used to make our products. Regulatory actions, including with respect to reimbursement for our products, may require costly expenditures or result in pricing pressure, and may decrease our gross profit and gross margin.
Selling, general and administrative expense
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expense includes costs to execute our sales strategy. These include personnel costs pertaining to our sales force and sales support functions, including salaries, commissions and other incentive compensation, commissions to sales agents, customer support, travel expenses, and bad debt expense. SG&A expense also includes costs related to functions which support our business, such as legal, finance, human resources, and other such functions that include costs such as personnel costs, insurance, and certain professional fees. We expect our SG&A expense to fluctuate based on revenue fluctuations, geographic changes, and any changes to the size of our headcount, particularly that of our sales and marketing forces. Certain of these costs scale with sales, but can fluctuate depending on sales mix. For example, we pay sales agents a greater commission than our internal sales force, meaning that we could incur greater commission expenses if a greater proportion of our sales are through sales agents.
Research and development expense
Research and development expense relates to our investments to expand our product pipeline and platforms, including historically through clinical trials, as well as expenditures in improvements to our manufacturing process and the enhancement of existing products. Our research and development costs also include expenses such as salaries and benefits related to our research department, consulting costs and advisory costs, and regulatory costs.
We expense research and development costs as incurred. Fluctuations in research and development expenses can be impacted by the timing and cadence of our clinical trials.
Investigation, restatement and related expense
Investigation, restatement and related expense primarily relates to legal fees advanced to certain former officers and directors of the Company under certain indemnification agreements and our liability from legal proceedings taken against us. The timing and extent of these expenses depend on the stage and status of legal proceedings. Other activity includes amounts received from certain director and officer insurance providers.
Interest expense
We incur interest expense primarily through stated interest on our outstanding term and revolving loans. The interest on our term and revolving loans are currently tied to applicable Secured Overnight Financing Rates (“SOFR”). Increases in SOFR
41
could cause our interest expense to increase. Other activity influencing interest expense relates to the amortization of deferred financing costs and original issue discount associated with credit facilities outstanding.
Income Taxes
We generate tax liability primarily in the United States and have net operating losses, research and development tax credit carryforwards, and other deferred tax assets which defray our liability. Large fluctuations are generally due to changes in our expectations of the realizability of our deferred tax assets. See “Critical Accounting Estimates” for further details.
Results of Continuing Operations for 2023 Compared to 2022
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)
Other expense, net (26) (4) (22) nm
Net income (loss) from continuing operations $ 67,439 $ (19,953) $ 87,392 nm
Net Sales
We recorded net sales for the year ended December 31, 2023 of $321.5 million, an increase of $53.6 million, or 20.0%, over the year ended December 31, 2022 net sales of $267.8 million.
Our sales by care setting were as follows (amounts in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, Change
Net sales in the Hospital setting were $187.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, a $23.8 million, or 14.6% increase, compared to $163.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was primarily driven by sales of our new products introduced since the third quarter of 2022, particularly AMNIOEFFECT.
Net sales in the Private Office setting grew by $18.6 million, or 24.1%, to $95.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $77.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase reflects general increases in sales volume, driven by strong commercial execution, an evolving Medicare reimbursement landscape in this site of service and sales of our new products introduced since the fourth quarter of 2023.
Net sales in Other care settings increased by $11.2 million, or 40.8%, to $38.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to $27.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was primarily driven by the addition of new customers in certain other sites of service and, to a lesser extent, initial contributions related to our commercial efforts in Japan.
42
Gross Margin and Cost of Sales
Gross margin in 2023 was 83.0%, compared to 82.0% in 2022. The increase in margin was driven by a higher proportion of sales with lower manufacturing costs as well as increased throughput efficiencies compared to 2022.
Cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $54.6 million, an increase of $6.3 million, or 13.1%, compared to $48.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in cost of sales was driven by the increase in sales volume and the changes in margins noted above.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
SG&A expense increased $2.5 million, or 1.2%, to $211.1 million for December 31, 2023, compared to $208.7 million for December 31, 2022. The increase was driven by higher levels of sales commissions due to higher sales volumes, as well as increases in stock-based compensation in 2023. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in certain administrative expenses, including severance expenses associated with the departure of our former CEO in 2022.
Research and Development Expense
Our research and development (“R&D”) expense remained essentially flat at $12.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022. Our R&D expenses in 2022 and 2023 were primarily driven by the development and launches of our newest products in the portfolio, AMNIOEFFECT, AXIOFILL and EPIEFFECT, along with additional early-stage Wound & Surgical products in development.
Investigation, Restatement and Related Expense
Investigation, restatement, and related expenses decreased $7.0 million to $5.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $12.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease was related to negotiated reductions in legal fees previously incurred under indemnification agreements with certain former members of management year-over-year. In addition, following the end of a legal proceeding, expenses under our last material indemnification agreement substantially ceased in 2023. Prior to this, the Company had incurred significant expenses in fulfilling its obligations under indemnification agreements by advancing and reimbursing legal fees of certain former officers and directors of the Company.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Amortization expense related to intangible assets increased $0.1 million from $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 to $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense increased $1.4 million to $6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 from $5.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was the result of year-over-year increases in the reference market interest rates on our outstanding debt. We expect interest expense to decrease in future quarters as a result of our debt refinancing transactions completed on January 2024.
Income Tax Provision
The effective tax rate for 2023 and 2022 was (120.2)% and (1.0)%, respectively, on pre-tax book income from continuing operations of $30.6 million for 2023 and pre-tax book loss from continuing operations of $19.7 million for 2022. Our effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2023 was significantly influenced by the reversal of a valuation allowance, reflecting a change in the determination of the likelihood of the realizability of certain of the Company’s deferred tax assets as of that date. This re-evaluation occurred as a result of the conclusion that the disbanding of our Regenerative Medicine segment qualified as a discontinued operation, in concert with the Company’s operating results. Net operating losses incurred during 2022 were offset by a full valuation allowance.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We require capital for our operating activities, including costs associated with the sale of product through direct and indirect sales channels, research and development activities, compliance costs, costs to sell and market our products, regulatory fees, and legal and consulting fees in connection with ongoing litigation and other matters. We generally fund our operating capital requirements through our operating activities and cash reserves. We expect to use capital to invest in the broadening of our
43
product portfolio, including through potential acquisitions, licensing agreements or other arrangements, the international expansion of our business and certain capital projects.
As of December 31, 2023, we had $82.0 million of cash and cash equivalents.
Our net working capital at December 31, 2023 was $118.3 million, an increase of $27.6 million from $90.6 million at December 31, 2022. Our current ratio was 3.6 to 1 as of December 31, 2023 and 3.1 to 1 as of December 31, 2022.
The Company is currently paying its obligations in the ordinary course of business. We believe that our anticipated cash from operating activities, existing cash and cash equivalents, and available credit under the Citizens Credit Agreement, as defined below, will enable us to meet our operational liquidity needs for the twelve months following the filing date of this Annual Report.
Contractual Obligations
Contractual obligations associated with ongoing business activities are expected to result in cash payments in future periods. See Item 8, Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies, in the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding our contractual commitments.
Citizens Loan Facilities
On January 19, 2024, we entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Citizens Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of banks comprised of Citizens Bank, N.A. as administrative agent (the “Agent”), and Bank of America, N.A. The Citizens Credit Agreement was designed to simultaneously improve our capital structure, providing the ability to refinance the $50 million Hayfin Term Loan at lower interest rates and have access to additional borrowing capacity that could be deployed in the future in support of our organic and potential inorganic growth objectives.
The Citizens Credit Agreement provides for senior secured credit facilities in an aggregate principal amount of up to $95.0 million consisting of: (i) a $75.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) with a $10.0 million letter of credit sublimit and a $10.0 million swingline loan sublimit, and (ii) a $20.0 million senior secured term loan facility (the “Term Loan Facility” and, together with the Revolving Credit Facility, the “Credit Facilities”). All obligations are required to be paid in full on January 19, 2029 (the “Maturity Date”), and are guaranteed by certain of the Company’s subsidiaries, and secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and the guarantors pursuant to a customary security agreement.Subject to the terms of the Citizens Credit Agreement, the Company has the option to obtain one or more incremental term loan facilities and/or increase the commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility in an aggregate principal amount equal to the greater of (i) $50.0 million and (ii) 1.00 times the Company’s Consolidated EBITDA as defined therein, each subject to the existing or any new lenders’ election to extend additional term loans or revolving commitments.
At our option, borrowings under the Citizens Credit Agreement (other than any swingline loan) will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to (i) the Alternate Base Rate, as defined therein, or (ii) a Term SOFR as defined therein, in each case plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.25% and 2.50% with respect to Alternate Base Rate borrowings and 2.25% and 3.50% for Term SOFR borrowings. Swingline loans will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to one-month Term SOFR plus the applicable margin. The applicable margin will be determined based on the Company’s consolidated total net leverage ratio.
The Company is required to pay a quarterly commitment fee on any unused portion of the Revolving Credit Facility, letter of credit fees, and other customary fees to the Agent and the Lenders. The Term Loan Facility will amortize on a quarterly basis at 1.25% (for year one and two), 1.875% (for year three and four), and 2.5% (for year five) based on the aggregate principal amount outstanding under the Term Loan Facility, with the remainder due on the Maturity Date. The Company must make mandatory prepayments in connection with certain asset dispositions and casualty events, subject in each case to customary reinvestment rights. The Company may prepay borrowings under the Credit Facilities at any time, without premium or penalty, and may, at its option, reduce the aggregate unused commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility in whole or in part, in each case subject to the terms of the Credit Agreement. The Company must also comply with certain financial covenants, including a maximum total net leverage ratio and a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio, as well as other customary restrictive covenants.
44
In addition, on January 19, 2024, we borrowed $30.0 million under the Revolving Credit Facility and $20.0 million under the Term Loan Facility. Proceeds from the initial drawings under the Credit Facilities, together with cash on hand, were used to repay in full the $50.0 million principal amount and other obligations under that certain Loan Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2020 (as amended from time to time), by and among the Company, the guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Hayfin Services LLP, as administrative and collateral agent (as amended from time to time, the “Hayfin Loan Agreement”) and to pay related fees, premiums, costs and expenses (collectively with the entry into the Citizens Credit Agreement and the initial borrowings thereunder, the “Debt Refinancing Transactions”).
On February 27, 2024, we repaid the initial $30.0 million drawing under the Revolving Credit Facility.
Hayfin Term Loan
In June 2020, we entered into the Hayfin Loan Agreement, under which Hayfin provided us with a senior secured term loan of $50 million (the “Hayfin Term Loan”). The Hayfin Term Loan was to mature on June 30, 2025 (the “Maturity Date”). Interest on any borrowings was based on SOFR, plus a fallback provision of 0.15%, subject to a floor of 1.5%, plus a margin of 6.75%. As of December 31, 2023, the Hayfin Term Loan carried an interest rate of 12.3%.
As noted above, in January 2024, we repaid in full the Hayfin Term Loan as part of the Debt Refinancing Transactions and terminated the Hayfin Loan Agreement.
Separation Agreement
In 2022, the Company entered into a Separation Agreement and General Release with Timothy R. Wright, the former Chief Executive Officer of the Company (the “Separation Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Separation Agreement and Mr. Wright’s general release of all claims against the Company, the Company will pay Mr. Wright a total of $3.1 million in cash in a series of installments through September 2024. Of this amount, $1.2 million is reflected in accrued compensation in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2023.
Discussion of Cash Flows for 2023 Compared to 2022
Operating Activities from Continuing Operations
During the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations increased $42.9 million to $34.9 million compared to cash used of $8.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily as a result of year-over-year increases in net sales, which drove increases in collections from customers, as well as year-over-year decreases in operating expenses during the year ended December 31, 2023.
Investing Activities
During the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash used in investing activities was $2.2 million, a decrease of $0.5 million, compared to $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The primary reason for the decrease was a $0.5 million increase in capital expenditures, year-over-year, offset by $1.0 million of payments made pursuant to a licensing agreement in 2022.
Financing Activities
During the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash used in financing activities was $8.6 million, an increase of $8.0 million compared to cash used in financing activities of $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. During 2023, we repurchased 5,000 shares of our Series B Preferred Stock for $9.5 million. The repurchase was offset by increases in proceeds from option exercises ($0.3 million) and decreases in stock repurchases for tax withholdings ($1.2 million).
Critical Accounting Estimates
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires that we make judgments and estimates which may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We derive these judgments and estimates on historical experience and other relevant factors which we believe to be reasonable. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Share-Based Compensation
45
Description
We measure the fair value of stock options and other stock-based awards granted to employees on the grant date and recognize the assessed fair value as share-based compensation expense, straight-line, over the requisite service period to achieve the award based on the vesting requirements, to the extent that the achievement of performance conditions associated with such awards, as applicable, are determined to be “probable.”
Judgments and Uncertainties
Share-based payment arrangements are measured at fair value on the grant date. The fair value of equity incentive awards, which are usually shares of our common stock, are generally measured at the last trading price on the grant date.
The fair value of stock options is calculated using an appropriate valuation technique. The valuation technique generally requires us to make certain assumptions, including (1) the fair value of the common stock, (2) the expected volatility of our stock price, (3) the expected term of the award, (4) the risk-free interest rate, and (5) expected dividends. Our expectation for volatility is generally based on historical daily share price movements, with certain adjustments for abnormal share price activity associated with events which are not expected to recur during the expected term. The expected term of the award requires us to make assumptions regarding the post-vesting behavior of the recipients, which is based off available evidence. Our assumption for the risk-free rate is derived from prevailing U.S. Treasuries with similar terms to the award on the grant date. Our assumption for dividends is derived from our own dividend history.
To the extent that any such awards are subject to a market condition, the resolution of the market condition is reflected in the fair value of the grant date. Further, the requisite service period associated with an award containing a market condition must derive the service period over which the market condition is expected to be met. Fair value and derived service periods are generally determined using a Monte Carlo simulation.
Subsequent to the determination of fair value, we recognize expense to the extent we evaluate that performance conditions associated with share-based payment arrangements are probable of occurring. In certain cases where the extent of vesting is based on the extent of achievement, we are required to determine the extent to which achievement is probable. We determine probable performance based on actual performance to date, internally-developed budgets and forecasts for periods covered by the relevant performance condition, and other evidence deemed relevant to this determination. We re-evaluate our probability assessments at least quarterly, with any revisions reflected as a cumulative adjustment to expense. Because of the cumulative nature of adjustments, during any period in which we re-evaluate probability, the adjustments could significantly impact our results of operations.
Sensitivity of Estimate to Change
For the year ended December 31, 2023, we granted stock options with a fair value on the grant date of $7.0 million. This estimate was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation using the following inputs:
Assumption
Stock price on grant date $ 3.70
Exercise price $ 3.70
Risk-free interest rate 3.58 %
Expected volatility (annualized) 75.00 %
Dividend yield — %
Weighted average grant date fair value $ 1.93
The granted stock options reflected an expected term based on our expectations for exercise activity. Changes in any of these assumptions could result in a revised estimate of fair value of the granted stock options, which would impact the amount of expense recognized over the requisite service period, and could materially affect the total fair value or the amount of expense recognized in a particular period.
In addition, cumulative expense recognized for unvested performance stock unit awards was $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. This is based on determinations regarding probable resolution or the extent of probable resolution of relevant performance conditions to earn such awards. If it is subsequently determined that the performance conditions associated with these awards are no longer probable of being met, or performance conditions which were determined to be probable of occurring do not actually occur, we could reverse up to this amount of expense in the period such determination is made. Furthermore, if probable levels of achievement are later determined to be greater, or actual achievement exceeds the level
46
of achievement assessed as probable, we could record increases to expense to reflect this level of achievement. The amount of any incremental expense recognition or reversal will depend on the magnitude and timing of such change in estimate.
Net Sales
Description
We record estimates for returns and allowances as a reduction to net sales based on our expectation for such returns.
Judgments and Uncertainties
We sell our products to individual customer and independent distributors (collectively referred to as “customers”). Customers obtain and use products either through ship and bill sales or consignment arrangements. We recognize revenue as performance obligations are fulfilled, which generally occurs upon the shipment of product to customers for ship and bill sales or upon implantation for consignment sales. We recognize revenue based on consideration we expect to receive from the sale. This consists of the gross selling price of the product, less any discounts, rebates, fees paid to GPOs, and an expectation for sales returns.
We maintain a return policy that allows our customers to return product for any reason within 30 days of sale, and to return product that is damaged or non-conforming, ordered in error, or due to recall at any time. We anticipate increases in sales returns in light of potential or actual regulatory actions.
We derive an expectation for product returns based on historical return patterns and other factors, including shifts in our regulatory environment and product recalls. Determinations involving other factors are based on our estimates for product at customer sites that are eligible for return.
Additions or reversals to our return allowance, as determined necessary, are accounted for prospectively and recorded as a decrease or increase to net sales, respectively. Actual returns are recorded against the recorded accrual.
Sensitivity of Estimate to Change
We have accrued $1.1 million for sales returns as of December 31, 2023. Changes in return patterns or unforeseen changes in regulations or identified product recalls could cause returns significantly in excess of this estimate.
Income Taxes
Description
We record a valuation allowance to offset our net deferred tax asset to the extent that realization is not likely.
Judgments and Uncertainties
Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. Transactions which result in lower taxable income in the future give rise to deferred tax assets.
We evaluate our ability to recover deferred tax assets based on projected future taxable income, scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, tax planning strategies, and our recent operating results. Judgment is required to determine whether the totality of this evidence suggests that we can recover our deferred tax assets in the future.
Sensitivity of Estimate to Change
As of December 31, 2023, we had $0.9 million in valuation allowances recorded against our deferred tax assets balance of $41.7 million. The amount and extent of the valuation allowance necessary to reflect the extent of realization of these deferred tax assets being more likely than not may change due to changes in tax law, a revision to our expectation regarding taxable income in the future, taxable income generated in a period in which we had not previously anticipated taxable income, a change in scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, and other changes.
If the weight of available evidence suggests that some or all of this amount is more likely than not to be realized, we will change the valuation allowance with a corresponding adjustment to income tax provision (benefit) expense to the extent that the underlying deferred tax asset is more likely than not to be realized.
47
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
See Item 8, Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies, in the Consolidated Financial Statements for recently adopted accounting pronouncements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates that could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. We do not hedge against interest rate risk.
The interest rate on our new Term Loan Facility is currently determined quarterly based on the 1-month SOFR. As of December 31, 2023, after giving effect to the Debt Refinancing Transactions, the interest rate on our Term Loan Facility was 7.9%. A 100-basis point change in SOFR would change interest expense by $0.5 million on an annualized basis.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, we incurred $1.5 million in incremental interest expense as a result of increases in relevant reference rates during the year under the Hayfin Loan Agreement.
48
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Index to Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets – As of December 31, 2023 and 2022 F- 4
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F- 8
F- 1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of MiMedx Group, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MiMedx Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 28, 2024, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Net Sales - Revenue Recognition — Refer to Note 2 to the Financial Statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company sells its products primarily to individual customers and independent distributors (collectively referred to as “customers”). Customers obtain and use products either through ship and bill sales or consignment arrangements. Under ship and bill arrangements, the Company retains possession of the product until the customer submits an order and the order is shipped to the customer. Under consignment arrangements, the customer takes possession of the product, but the Company retains title until the implantation, or application of the Company’s product to the end user. The Company recognizes revenue as performance obligations are fulfilled, which generally occurs upon the shipment of product to the customers for ship and bill orders or upon implantation for consignment sales.
We identified the timing of revenue recognition for ship and bill and consignment sales at or near year end as a critical audit matter because of the judgments involved in evaluating that the performance obligations are fulfilled. This required a higher degree of audit effort and auditor judgment when performing audit procedures and evaluating the results of these procedures.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the timing of revenue recognition transactions included the following, among others:
•We tested the effectiveness of controls over the recognition of ship and bill and consignment sales at or near year end.
•We created data visualizations using a detail of all revenue transactions and evaluated trends in the transactional revenue data with emphasis on activity at or near year end.
•We evaluated and tested corollary relationships between revenue and related accounts.
•We evaluated the appropriateness and consistency of the methods and assumptions utilized by management to estimate consignment revenue.
•We tested a sample of consignment revenue transactions manually accrued as of year-end and evaluated whether the transactions were recorded in the correct period.
•We selected a sample of ship and bill revenue transactions close to period end by agreeing the amounts recognized to source documents and evaluating whether the transaction was recorded in the correct period.
•We tested a sample of credits issued after year end by agreeing to documents supporting the authorization for the issuance of the credit and to evaluate if the credit was issued in the correct period.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 28, 2024
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2021.
MIMEDX GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
December 31,
ASSETS
Current assets:
Current assets of discontinued operations — 1,331
Deferred tax assets 40,777 —
Noncurrent assets of discontinued operations — 535
LIABILITIES, CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK, AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Current liabilities of discontinued operations 1,352 1,479
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)
Stockholders’ equity (deficit)
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
MIMEDX GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Year Ended December 31,
Operating expenses:
Impairment of intangible assets — — 53
Other expense, net
Other expense, net (26) (4) (23)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax (9,211) (10,244) 2,016
Basic net income (loss) per common share:
Continuing operations $ 0.48 $ (0.24) $ (0.17)
Basic net income (loss) per common share: $ 0.40 $ (0.33) $ (0.15)
Diluted net income (loss) per common share:
Continuing operations $ 0.43 $ (0.24) $ (0.17)
Diluted net income (loss) per common share: $ 0.37 $ (0.33) $ (0.15)
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
MIMEDX GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(in thousands, except share data)
Common Stock AdditionalPaid-in Treasury Stock Accumulated
Shares Amount Capital Shares Amount Deficit Total
Deemed dividends — — (926) — — — (926)
Share-based compensation expense — — 14,757 — — — 14,757
Restricted stock shares canceled/forfeited — — 515 73,056 (515) — —
Share-based compensation expense — — 12,666 — — — 12,666
Restricted stock shares canceled/forfeited — — 30 5,338 (30) — —
Repurchase of Series B Preferred Stock — — (4,935) — — — (4,935)
Share-based compensation expense — — 17,178 — — — 17,178
Restricted stock shares canceled/forfeited — — 378 90,367 (378) — —
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
MIMEDX GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
Cash flows from operating activities:
Deferred income tax provision (37,802) — —
Amortization of deferred financing costs 505 467 1,055
Accretion of asset retirement obligation 93 92 81
Loss (gain) on fixed asset disposal 15 (17) 262
Impairment of intangible assets — — 53
Increase (decrease) in cash resulting from changes in:
Cash flows from investing activities:
Sales of equipment — 24 —
Cash paid for licensing agreement — (1,000) —
Principal payments from note receivable — — 75
Net cash flows used in investing activities (2,155) (2,660) (3,395)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 997 651 1,437
Payments under finance lease obligations (52) (41) (38)
Repurchase of Series B Preferred Shares (9,515) — —
Net cash flows used in financing activities (8,570) (580) (3,352)
See notes to the consolidated financial statements.
MIMEDX GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.Nature of Business
MiMedx Group, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, except where the context otherwise requires, “MIMEDX,” or the “Company”) is a pioneer and leader in placental biologics focused on helping humans heal. With more than a decade of helping clinicians manage chronic and other hard-to-heal wounds, MIMEDX is dedicated to providing a leading portfolio of products for applications in the wound care, burn, and surgical sectors of healthcare. The Company’s vision is to be the leading global provider of healing solutions through relentless innovation to restore quality of life. All of our products sold in the United States are regulated by the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”).
The Company’s product portfolio and product development focuses on Wound and Surgical markets.
The Company’s business is focused primarily on the United States of America but the Company also has a small commercial presence in several international locations, including Japan.
Disbanding of Regenerative Medicine Business Unit
On June 20, 2023, the Company announced the disbanding of its Regenerative Medicine business unit and the suspension of its Knee Osteoarthritis clinical trial program. During the fourth quarter of 2023, the Company completed the regulatory obligations associated with the clinical trial and concluded that the business unit met the criteria for presentation as a discontinued operation at that time. Refer to Note 13, Discontinued Operations, for further discussion.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of MiMedx Group, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.
Reclassifications
Increases in cash resulting from changes in income taxes of $0 and $9.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, were separately presented in previously issued consolidated statements of cash flows. These amounts are reflected as part of changes in other assets in the consolidated statements of cash flows included in these consolidated financial statements.
Use of Estimates
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported consolidated statements of operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include estimated useful lives and potential impairment of property and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets, estimates of loss for contingent liabilities, estimate of allowance for doubtful accounts, estimate of fair value of share-based payments, the extent of probable achievement of performance conditions in share-based payment awards, estimates of returns and allowances, and valuation of deferred tax assets.
Segment Reporting
The application of GAAP requires the use of the “management approach” model for segment reporting. The management approach model is based on the way a company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) organizes segments within the Company for which separate financial information is available regarding resource allocation and assessing performance. The Company has concluded that its Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) is its CODM. The Company reassesses the existence of operating segments when facts and circumstances suggest that there may have been a change in the way that the Company is managed. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2023, the Company assessed that it operated as two operating and reportable segments: Wound & Surgical and Regenerative Medicine. During the fourth quarter of 2023, upon the conclusion that the Regenerative Medicine segment met all the requirements to be classified as a discontinued operation, the Company reassessed its operating segments, concluding that the CODM assesses performance and resources as one reportable segment.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash held at various banks. The Company considers all highly-liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase and money market mutual funds to be cash equivalents.
Market Concentrations and Credit Risk
The Company places its cash and cash equivalents on deposit with U.S.-based financial institutions. The U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) provides insurance coverage for deposits up to $250,000 for substantially all depository accounts. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $81.3 million and $65.2 million, respectively, in excess of the insured amounts in five depository institutions.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable represent amounts due from customers for which revenue has been recognized. Generally, the Company does not require collateral or any other security to support its receivables.
The allowance for doubtful accounts is calculated based on the Company’s current expectations for credit losses, which is generally informed by historical trends. The Company’s policy to reserve for potential bad debts based on the age of the individual receivable as well as customer-specific qualitative factors, such as bankruptcy proceedings. The Company manages credit risk by routinely performing credit checks on customers prior to sales. Individual receivables are written-off after all reasonable efforts to collect the funds have been made. Actual write-offs may differ from the amounts reserved.
Inventory
Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Costs of inventory sold are recognized using the first–in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. Inventory is tracked through raw material, work-in-process, and finished goods stages as the product progresses through various production steps and stocking locations. Labor and overhead costs are absorbed through the various production processes up to when the work order closes. Historical yields and normal capacities are utilized in the calculation of production overhead rates. Write-downs are utilized to account for slow-moving inventory as well as inventory no longer needed due to diminished demand or regulatory action.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated on a straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, principally three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated on a straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives and the remaining lease term.
Asset Retirement Obligations
The Company records obligations associated with the legal requirement to retire long-lived assets when an estimate for the cost of retirement can reasonably be made. The Company reviews legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from contractual obligations or the acquisition, construction, development and/or normal use of the assets. If it is determined that a legal obligation exists, regardless of whether the obligation is conditional on a future event, the fair value of the liability for an asset retirement obligation is recognized in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The fair value is calculated as the estimate of the expected cash outflow to satisfy the legal obligation discounted to present value using the Company’s then-prevailing incremental borrowing rate. At such point in time, an asset and liability are recorded for the amount of the expected liability. The asset amount is depreciated, straight-line, over the life of the underlying asset, while the liability is accreted to the amount of the expected outflow through selling, general and administrative expense using the effective interest method. Subsequent revisions to estimates for future cash flows related to the asset retirement obligations are recorded as equal increases or decreases to the retirement asset and liability.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
The Company evaluates the recoverability of its long-lived assets (property, equipment, right of use, and intangible assets with finite lives) whenever adverse events or changes in business climate indicate that the expected undiscounted future cash flows from the related assets may be less than their carrying amounts. When a situation arises which results in a conclusion that it is more likely than not that an asset is not recoverable, the Company estimates cash flows expected to be derived from the continuing use and eventual disposition of the asset. If the sum of those cash flows, not discounted to present value, does not exceed the net book value of the asset, the Company estimates the fair value of the asset. Impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the net book value exceeds the fair value of the asset.
Impairment reviews are based on an estimated future cash flow approach that requires significant judgment with respect to future revenue and expense growth rates, selection of appropriate discount rate (as applicable), asset groupings, and other assumptions and estimates. The Company uses estimates that are consistent with its business plans and a market participant view of the assets being evaluated. Actual results may differ from these estimates.